Search Results

Search found 21364 results on 855 pages for 'service bus'.

Page 143/855 | < Previous Page | 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150  | Next Page >

  • svchost.exe crash on wake up

    - by Serge
    Lately whenever I wake up my laptop from sleep I get a series of errors (generated by a host process failing) I haven't been able to figure out why this happens but I know which host process fails and was wondering if someone had some insight on why this keeps occuring 99% of the time when my laptop wakes up. here's the host process error Faulting application svchost.exe_SysMain, version 6.0.6001.18000, time stamp 0x47919291, faulting module ntdll.dll, version 6.0.6002.18005, time stamp 0x49e0421d, exception code 0xc0000006, fault offset 0x000000000005a02d, process id 0x1738, application start time 0x01cae656279b1010. and here are some services that fail because of that host The Windows Audio Endpoint Builder service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 60000 milliseconds: Restart the service. The Wired AutoConfig service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds: Restart the service. The ReadyBoost service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 2 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 60000 milliseconds: Restart the service. The Human Interface Device Access service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 120000 milliseconds: Restart the service. The Network Connections service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 2 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 100 milliseconds: Restart the service. The Program Compatibility Assistant Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 2 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 60000 milliseconds: Restart the service. The Superfetch service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 2 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 60000 milliseconds: Restart the service. Anyways I think you get the point, there are a few more. It got really annoying to wait for those services to restart so I created a batch file that does it automatically whenever the wlan stops I'm using Vista x64 on a Studio XPS 1640

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-2372 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 3.5 Firefox web browser Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 3 Solaris 10 Contact Support CVE-2011-2995 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-2997 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3000 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3001 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3002 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3003 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3004 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3005 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3232 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3648 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3650 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3651 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3652 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3654 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3655 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 9.3 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Register Now, Free Webinar! Driving Self-Service Learning with UPK Knowledge Center

    - by Kathryn Lustenberger
    UPK Proficiency Forum  Driving Self-Service Learning with UPK Knowledge Center July 16, at 11 am Pacific Join Oracle University for the next UPK Proficiency Forum on July 16, at 11 am Pacific. Beth Renstrom and Kathryn Lustenberger from UPK Product Management at Oracle will present an exciting session on "Driving Self-Service Learning with UPK Knowledge Center. Knowledge Center is a powerful, web-based knowledge repository that delivers an out-of-the-box deployment method for UPK content, enables extensive tracking and reporting, and can serve as content repository for UPK and non-UPK content. Hear how your organization can use Knowledge Center to centralize both UPK and non-UPK assets to provide self-service, role-based, curriculum-style learning. Understand how Knowledge Center can be used to deploy a collaborative user and expert environment where users can turn knowledge into productivity, ensure on-going user competency, and measure organizational readiness across your organization. You will walk away from this session with a better understanding of Oracle’s User Productivity Professional; Knowledge Center and all the benefits it has to offer your organization. You won’t want to miss this Free seminar! Attendance is limited. Register Now!

    Read the article

  • Building a Redundant / Distrubuted Application

    - by MattW
    This is more of a "point me in the right direction" question. I (and my team of 3) have built a hosted web app that queues and routes customer chat requests to available customer service agents (It does other things as well, but this is enough background to illustrate the issue). The basic dev architecture today is: a single page ajax web UI (ASP.NET MVC) with floating chat windows (think Gmail) a backend Windows service to queue and route the chat requests this service also logs the chats, calculates service levels, etc a Comet server product that routes data between the web frontend and the backend Windows service this also helps us detect which Agents are still connected (online) And our hardware architecture today is: 2 servers to host the web UI portion of the application a load balancer to route requests to the 2 different web app servers a third server to host the SQL Server DB and the backend Windows service responsible for queuing / delivering chats So as it stands today, one of the web app servers could go down and we would be ok. However, if something would happen to the SQL Server / Windows Service server we would be boned. My question - how can I make this backend Windows service logic be able to be spread across multiple machines (distributed)? The Windows service is written to accept requests from the Comet server, check for available Agents, and route the chat to those agents. How can I make this more distributed? How can I make it so that I can distribute the work of the backend Windows service can be spread across multiple machines for redundancy and uptime purposes? Will I need to re-write it with distributed computing in mind? I should also note that I am hosting all of this on Rackspace Cloud instances - so maybe it is something I should be less concerned about? Thanks in advance for any help!

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized!

    - by mseika
    Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized! Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates. Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2012 Specialization · New Specialist Guided Learning Paths Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist · New Specialist Assessments Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist Assessment · Coming Soon! - New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Recruiting Certified Implementation Specialist Contact UsPlease direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized!

    - by mseika
    Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized! Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates. Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2012 Specialization · New Specialist Guided Learning Paths Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist · New Specialist Assessments Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist Assessment · Coming Soon! - New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Recruiting Certified Implementation Specialist Contact UsPlease direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized!

    - by mseika
    Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized! Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates. Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2012 Specialization · New Specialist Guided Learning Paths Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist · New Specialist Assessments Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist Assessment · Coming Soon! - New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Recruiting Certified Implementation Specialist Contact UsPlease direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized!

    - by mseika
    Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized! Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates. Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2012 Specialization · New Specialist Guided Learning Paths Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist · New Specialist Assessments Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist Assessment · Coming Soon! - New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Recruiting Certified Implementation Specialist Contact UsPlease direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized!

    - by mseika
    Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized! Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates. Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2012 Specialization · New Specialist Guided Learning Paths Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist · New Specialist Assessments Available! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Sales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 PreSales Specialist Assessment · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Support Specialist Assessment · Coming Soon! - New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam! · Oracle Taleo Cloud Service 2012 Recruiting Certified Implementation Specialist Contact UsPlease direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Synchronous Actions

    - by Dan Krasinski-Oracle
    Since the introduction of SMF, svcadm(1M) has had the ability to enable or disable a service instance and wait for that service instance to reach a final state.  With Oracle Solaris 11.2, we’ve expanded the set of administrative actions which can be invoked synchronously. Now all subcommands of svcadm(1M) have synchronous behavior. Let’s take a look at the new usage: Usage: svcadm [-v] [cmd [args ... ]] svcadm enable [-rt] [-s [-T timeout]] <service> ... enable and online service(s) svcadm disable [-t] [-s [-T timeout]] <service> ... disable and offline service(s) svcadm restart [-s [-T timeout]] <service> ... restart specified service(s) svcadm refresh [-s [-T timeout]] <service> ... re-read service configuration svcadm mark [-It] [-s [-T timeout]] <state> <service> ... set maintenance state svcadm clear [-s [-T timeout]] <service> ... clear maintenance state svcadm milestone [-d] [-s [-T timeout]] <milestone> advance to a service milestone svcadm delegate [-s] <restarter> <svc> ... delegate service to a restarter As you can see, each subcommand now has a ‘-s’ flag. That flag tells svcadm(1M) to wait for the subcommand to complete before returning. For enables, that means waiting until the instance is either ‘online’ or in the ‘maintenance’ state. For disable, the instance must reach the ‘disabled’ state. Other subcommands complete when: restart A restart is considered complete once the instance has gone offline after running the ‘stop’ method, and then has either returned to the ‘online’ state or has entered the ‘maintenance’ state. refresh If an instance is in the ‘online’ state, a refresh is considered complete once the ‘refresh’ method for the instance has finished. mark maintenance Marking an instance for maintenance completes when the instance has reached the ‘maintenance’ state. mark degraded Marking an instance as degraded completes when the instance has reached the ‘degraded’ state from the ‘online’ state. milestone A milestone transition can occur in one of two directions. Either the transition moves from a lower milestone to a higher one, or from a higher one to a lower one. When moving to a higher milestone, the transition is considered complete when the instance representing that milestone reaches the ‘online’ state. The transition to a lower milestone, on the other hand, completes only when all instances which are part of higher milestones have reached the ‘disabled’ state. That’s not the whole story. svcadm(1M) will also try to determine if the actions initiated by a particular subcommand cannot complete. Trying to enable an instance which does not have its dependencies satisfied, for example, will cause svcadm(1M) to terminate before that instance reaches the ‘online’ state. You’ll also notice the optional ‘-T’ flag which can be used in conjunction with the ‘-s’ flag. This flag sets a timeout, in seconds, after which svcadm gives up on waiting for the subcommand to complete and terminates. This is useful in many cases, but in particular when the start method for an instance has an infinite timeout but might get stuck waiting for some resource that may never become available. For the C-oriented, each of these administrative actions has a corresponding function in libscf(3SCF), with names like smf_enable_instance_synchronous(3SCF) and smf_restart_instance_synchronous(3SCF).  Take a look at smf_enable_instance_synchronous(3SCF) for details.

    Read the article

  • Push-Based Events in a Services Oriented Architecture

    - by Colin Morelli
    I have come to a point, in building a services oriented architecture (on top of Thrift), that I need to expose events and allow listeners. My initial thought was, "create an EventService" to handle publishing and subscribing to events. That EventService can use whatever implementation it desires to actually distribute the events. My client automatically round-robins service requests to available service hosts which are determined using Zookeeper-based service discovery. So, I'd probably use JMS inside of EventService mainly for the purpose of persisting messages (in the event that a service host for EventService goes down before it can distribute the message to all of the available listeners). When I started considering this, I began looking into the differences between Queues and Topics. Topics unfortunately won't work for me, because (at least for now), all listeners must receive the message (even if they were down at the time the event was pushed, or hadn't made a subscription yet because they haven't completed startup (during deployment, for example) - messages should be queued until the service is available). However, I don't want EventService to be responsible for handling all of the events. I don't think it should have the code to react to events inside of it. Each of the services should do what it needs with a given event. This would indicate that each service would need a JMS connection, which questions the value of having EventService at all (as the services could individually publish and subscribe to JMS directly). However, it also couples all of the services to JMS (when I'd rather that there be a single service that's responsible for determining how to distribute events). What I had thought was to publish an event to EventService, which pulls a configuration of listeners from some configuration source (database, flat file, irrelevant for now). It replicates the message and pushes each one back into a queue with information specific to that listener (so, if there are 3 listeners, 1 event would become 3 events in JMS). Then, another thread in EventService (which is replicated, running on multiple hots) would be pulling from the queue, attempting to make the service call to the "listener", and returning the message to the queue (if the service is down), or discarding the message (if the listener completed successfully). tl;dr If I have an EventService that is responsible for receiving events and delegating service calls to "event listeners," (which are really just endpoints on other services), how should it know how to craft the service call? Should I create a generic "Event" object that is shared among all services? Then, the EventService can just construct this object and pass it to the service call. Or is there a better answer to this problem entirely?

    Read the article

  • Building a Redundant / Distributed Application

    - by MattW
    This is more of a "point me in the right direction" question. My team of three and I have built a hosted web app that queues and routes customer chat requests to available customer service agents (It does other things as well, but this is enough background to illustrate the issue). The basic dev architecture today is: a single page ajax web UI (ASP.NET MVC) with floating chat windows (think Gmail) a backend Windows service to queue and route the chat requests this service also logs the chats, calculates service levels, etc a Comet server product that routes data between the web frontend and the backend Windows service this also helps us detect which Agents are still connected (online) And our hardware architecture today is: 2 servers to host the web UI portion of the application a load balancer to route requests to the 2 different web app servers a third server to host the SQL Server DB and the backend Windows service responsible for queuing / delivering chats So as it stands today, one of the web app servers could go down and we would be ok. However, if something would happen to the SQL Server / Windows Service server we would be boned. My question - how can I make this backend Windows service logic be able to be spread across multiple machines (distributed)? The Windows service is written to accept requests from the Comet server, check for available Agents, and route the chat to those agents. How can I make this more distributed? How can I make it so that I can distribute the work of the backend Windows service can be spread across multiple machines for redundancy and uptime purposes? Will I need to re-write it with distributed computing in mind? I should also note that I am hosting all of this on Rackspace Cloud instances - so maybe it is something I should be less concerned about? Thanks in advance for any help!

    Read the article

  • Should You Delete Windows 7 Service Pack Backup Files to Save Space?

    - by The Geek
    After you install the Windows 7 Service Pack 1 that we mentioned yesterday, you might be wondering how to reclaim some of the lost drive space—which we’ll show you how today—but should you actually do it? Note: If you haven’t installed the new SP1 release yet, be sure to read our post explaining what it entails before you do. Spoiler: it’s mostly bugfixes. Latest Features How-To Geek ETC Should You Delete Windows 7 Service Pack Backup Files to Save Space? What Can Super Mario Teach Us About Graphics Technology? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is Released: But Should You Install It? How To Make Hundreds of Complex Photo Edits in Seconds With Photoshop Actions How to Enable User-Specific Wireless Networks in Windows 7 How to Use Google Chrome as Your Default PDF Reader (the Easy Way) Read On Phone Pushes Data from Your Desktop to the Appropriate Android App MetroTwit is a Sleek Native Twitter Client for Your Windows System Make Efficient Use of Tab Bar Space by Customizing Tab Width in Firefox See the Geeky Work Done Behind the Scenes to Add Sounds to Movies [Video] Use a Crayon to Enhance Engraved Lettering on Electronics Adult Swim Brings Their Programming Lineup to iOS Devices

    Read the article

  • Cloud Computing Forces Better Design Practices

    - by Herve Roggero
    Is cloud computing simply different than on premise development, or is cloud computing actually forcing you to create better applications than you normally would? In other words, is cloud computing merely imposing different design principles, or forcing better design principles?  A little while back I got into a discussion with a developer in which I was arguing that cloud computing, and specifically Windows Azure in his case, was forcing developers to adopt better design principles. His opinion was that cloud computing was not yielding better systems; just different systems. In this blog, I will argue that cloud computing does force developers to use better design practices, and hence better applications. So the first thing to define, of course, is the word “better”, in the context of application development. Looking at a few definitions online, better means “superior quality”. As it relates to this discussion then, I stipulate that cloud computing can yield higher quality applications in terms of scalability, everything else being equal. Before going further I need to also outline the difference between performance and scalability. Performance and scalability are two related concepts, but they don’t mean the same thing. Scalability is the measure of system performance given various loads. So when developers design for performance, they usually give higher priority to a given load and tend to optimize for the given load. When developers design for scalability, the actual performance at a given load is not as important; the ability to ensure reasonable performance regardless of the load becomes the objective. This can lead to very different design choices. For example, if your objective is to obtains the fastest response time possible for a service you are building, you may choose the implement a TCP connection that never closes until the client chooses to close the connection (in other words, a tightly coupled service from a connectivity standpoint), and on which a connection session is established for faster processing on the next request (like SQL Server or other database systems for example). If you objective is to scale, you may implement a service that answers to requests without keeping session state, so that server resources are released as quickly as possible, like a REST service for example. This alternate design would likely have a slower response time than the TCP service for any given load, but would continue to function at very large loads because of its inherently loosely coupled design. An example of a REST service is the NO-SQL implementation in the Microsoft cloud called Azure Tables. Now, back to cloud computing… Cloud computing is designed to help you scale your applications, specifically when you use Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings. However it’s not automatic. You can design a tightly-coupled TCP service as discussed above, and as you can imagine, it probably won’t scale even if you place the service in the cloud because it isn’t using a connection pattern that will allow it to scale [note: I am not implying that all TCP systems do not scale; I am just illustrating the scalability concepts with an imaginary TCP service that isn’t designed to scale for the purpose of this discussion]. The other service, using REST, will have a better chance to scale because, by design, it minimizes resource consumption for individual requests and doesn’t tie a client connection to a specific endpoint (which means you can easily deploy this service to hundreds of machines without much trouble, as long as your pockets are deep enough). The TCP and REST services discussed above are both valid designs; the TCP service is faster and the REST service scales better. So is it fair to say that one service is fundamentally better than the other? No; not unless you need to scale. And if you don’t need to scale, then you don’t need the cloud in the first place. However, it is interesting to note that if you do need to scale, then a loosely coupled system becomes a better design because it can almost always scale better than a tightly-coupled system. And because most applications grow overtime, with an increasing user base, new functional requirements, increased data and so forth, most applications eventually do need to scale. So in my humble opinion, I conclude that a loosely coupled system is not just different than a tightly coupled system; it is a better design, because it will stand the test of time. And in my book, if a system stands the test of time better than another, it is of superior quality. Because cloud computing demands loosely coupled systems so that its underlying service architecture can be leveraged, developers ultimately have no choice but to design loosely coupled systems for the cloud. And because loosely coupled systems are better… … the cloud forces better design practices. My 2 cents.

    Read the article

  • Should business services cross bounded contexts?

    - by Paul T Davies
    Firstly, I am following the convention that a bounded context is synonymous to a department, or possibly one department has 1 to many bounded contexts. We have a client consultancy department that has a Documentation Service. Documents are stored in the Document Store Service (which is where all documents in the company are stored - it is a utility service), and the Documentation Service stores information about that document (a business service). As it was designed for the client consultancy, it is information relevant to them. Now health and safety need somewhere to store information about a document. This is different information to client consultancy, but I have been instructed to extend the existing service to account for this extra information. I feel this service is now crossing a bounded context. My worry is that all departments will eventually store there information in here and the service will become bloated, trying to be all things to all departments. Each document record will only store a subset of the information because it will only belong to one department. It will get worse when different departments want to store the same information but refer to it in a diferent ways, or when two departments want to store different information that they refer to in the same way. In my understanding, this is exactly the reason for bounded contexts. I feel each department should have it's own business service for information about a document, but use the same utility service to actually store the document. What would be the correct approach?

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

    - by mseika
    Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service. Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013. Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

    - by mseika
    Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.  New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013.   Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

    - by mseika
    Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service. Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013. Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

    Read the article

  • Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

    - by mseika
    Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service. Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013. Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

    Read the article

  • What service or software should I use to serve advertising on a site with about 120k monthly page views?

    - by JasonBirch
    I have a site that is generating about 120k monthly page views and is being hosted on a shared FreeBSD server where I have access to PHP and MySQL. I am using some custom PHP server-side scripts that give each of my ad networks (AdSense, Tribal Fusion, etc) an adjustable percentage of impressions in each of the ad positions on my pages. I am looking for a better way of managing and measuring the delivery of these ads, and would also like to be able to take direct placements and provide statistics to the clients. I am looking at options including OpenX self-hosted, OpenX community, and Google DoubleClick for Publishers Small Business (DFP), but am having difficulty determining which one will best meet my needs. They all seem to have pretty steep learning curves compared to my simple scripts. What I have taken away so far as the benefit of self-hosting is that I don't have to pay for the service if I exceed a maximum number of ad impressions, while both OpenX Community and DFP have free impression limits. Of course, if I was doing those kind of numbers I'd need to upgrade my hosting account, but I'm not sure even at that point whether it would be cheaper to serve the ads myself than pay for a premium service. Apart from this, I really need insights into what features differentiate these services, why I might want to choose one over another, and if there are any other competing products or service of the same quality that I should look into. Answers from webmasters who have used both (or all three) services and can talk to usability and ease of ad management would be highly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Java EE 6????????????????! ??????????????????????J2EE??????????J2EE??????JavaOne Tokyo 2012?????

    - by ??? 03
    Java EE???????Java EE???????????????·????????????Core J2EE Patterns(J2EE????)?????????????????????10???????????????? “????????????”?????????????Java EE??????6?????????WebLogic Server?????????????·???????????????J2EE???????????????????????????????2012?4???????JavaOne Tokyo 2012??????????Java EE 6???J2EE???????????????? ???????????????????????????????J2EE????????????????????Java EE 6??????J2EE???????????????(???)? J2EE???????????3???????????J2EE(J2EE 1.4???Java EE)????????????????????????????????????????J2EE???????????J2EE?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????J2EE?????????????·?????????????????????????Core J2EE Patterns??????? ??J2EE?????????10?????????????????????????????Java EE???????????????????????????????????????????????????J2EE?????????????????????/???????????????????????????????J2EE????????????????????3??????????? ?????? ?????????????? ???????????????????1?????????????Java EE 6????????EJB 3.1?JPA(Java Persistence API) 2.0?CDI(Contexts and Dependency Injection) 1.0????????????????????2???????????·????????????????????·?????Java EE????????????????????????3???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????(??)???????????????????????????????(???) Anemic?“??DOM”??????????????????????????????DOM????????????????????Java EE??????????????????????????????·?????????DOM(Domain Object Model)????????????????????? ?????????·???????????????????????????????????????Anemic(??)???DOM?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Anemic?DOM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????·????????????????Java EE 6??????????????????????????DOM????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????DOM??????????????????????????????/????????????????????????????????????????????DOM?????????????DOM?Java EE????????????????????????????(???) ???DOM??????????J2EE???Java EE 6??????????????????????????J2EE??????????????????????Anemic???DOM?????????????????????????DOM???????DAO(Data Access Object)?????????????????????????????????DOM???????????????DOM?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java EE???Java EE 6??????JPA 2.0????????????DOM??????????????????????????????DOM????????????????????? ???JPA???????????????????????Java EE????J2EE?????????????????Java EE???????????????????????Java EE????????????DOM?????????????????????????????????????????????????????DOM?????????????????????Java EE???????????????????????????(???)????????????3???????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ????? ?????????????????10????????????J2EE?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Session Fac,ade?Application Service?Business Object(Composite Entity)???????????????Transfer Object?Value List Handler?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java EE???????????????????????????????????Business Delegate?Service Locator??????????????Java EE??????????????? Session Fac,ade??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Session Fac,ade????????Application Service?Business Object????????????????????????????????Java EE 6???????????????(????)??????????????????Session Fac,ade???????????????????·?????????????????????????????????Application Service?????????????????????·????????????????????????Business Object??????????·?????????POJO??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? J2EE??????????????Java EE 6???????????????????????????????????????Java EE???DAO?Domain Store?????????????Service Activator?Web Service Broker???API??????????????????? ????DAO?????·???????????????????????????????????????????1???????????????·???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????(????)?????????????????????????????????DAO??????????EntityManager???????????????????????????????????DAO?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Criteria Object????????????????????????DAO??????????????????????DAO?????????????????? ???Service Activator????????????????????????????????????????????????JMS(Java Message Service)?MDB(Message Driven Bean)????????????????Java EE 6??????EJB 3.1????Session Bean?????·????????????@Asynchronous?????????????????????????????????Future?????????????????????????????????????????Java EE 6?????????????????????Service Activator????????????????? ????????·?????????????????????????????????????????????MDB?????????????????????????????????@Asynchronous?????????SLA????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????Web???????????????????????????????????????????JSF(Java Server Faces)?????????????????????JSF???????????????????Intercepting Filter??????????????????????????????????JSF???????????? ??????????J2EE???????????????????????????Java EE?????????????????????????????????????Session Fac,ade?Business Object????Application Service??????????????????????????????????????????????Java EE??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Read the article

  • Is AMQP suitable as both an intra and inter-machine software bus?

    - by Bwooce
    I'm trying to get my head around AMQP. It looks great for inter-machine (cluster, LAN, WAN) communication between applications but I'm not sure if it is suitable (in architectural, and current implementation terms) for use as a software bus within one machine. Would it be worth pulling out a current high performance message passing framework to replace it with AMQP, or is this falling into the same trap as RPC by blurring the distinction between local and non-local communication? I'm also wary of the performance impacts of using a WAN technology for intra-machine communications, although this may be more of an implementation concern than architecture. War stories would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Can someone explain an Enterprise Service Bus to me in non-buzzspeak?

    - by Jason Baker
    Some of our partners are telling us that our software needs to interact with an Enterprise Service Bus. After researching this a bit, my instinct is to say that this is just buzz speak for saying that we need to have a platform-indpendent way to pass messages back and forth. I'm just trying to get a feel for what our partners are telling us. Am I correct in dismissing our partners' request as just trying to get our software to be more buzzword-compliant, or are they telling us something we should listen to (even if encoded in buzzspeak)?

    Read the article

  • How to fix an endpoint/configuration error using WCF in VB.NET

    - by Eric
    I'm working with a small web page that is meant to assist the users of my application. This web page takes a file and sends it to a central server, which then does something with the data and returns a result. I created this application some time ago and am coming back to it recently. I am getting some kind of configuration error right now, although this application used to work. When it stopped working, whenever I ran the page and sent the data to the central server, I would get this error: "Could not find default endpoint element that references contract 'CentralService.ICwCentralService' in the ServiceModel client configuration section. This might be because no configuration file was found for your application, or because no endpoint element matching this contract could be found in the client element." Looking at some other issues on the net, I thought I might have had the answer. The service reference to the endpoint was contained in a separate project from the code that called it, but the configuration file in that project had no information about the endpoint. So, I added these entries to the web.config file in the main project: <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <wsHttpBinding> <binding name="wsHttpEndpoint" closeTimeout="00:01:00" openTimeout="00:0:10" receiveTimeout="01:10:00" sendTimeout="01:01:00" bypassProxyOnLocal="false" transactionFlow="false" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard" maxBufferPoolSize="999999999" maxReceivedMessageSize="999999999" messageEncoding="Text" textEncoding="utf-8" useDefaultWebProxy="true" allowCookies="false"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="999999999" maxStringContentLength="999999999" maxArrayLength="999999999" maxBytesPerRead="999999999" maxNameTableCharCount="999999999" /> <reliableSession ordered="true" inactivityTimeout="01:10:00" enabled="false" /> <security mode="Message"> <transport clientCredentialType="Windows" proxyCredentialType="None" realm="" /> <message clientCredentialType="Windows" negotiateServiceCredential="true" algorithmSuite="Default" establishSecurityContext="true" /> </security> </binding> </wsHttpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint address="http://localhost:22269/CwCentralService.svc" binding="wsHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="wsHttpEndpoint" contract="CentralService.ICwCentralService" name="wsHttpEndpoint"> <identity> <servicePrincipalName /> </identity> </endpoint> </client> </system.serviceModel> Now, if I run it, I'm still getting an error: "The remote server returned an unexpected response: (400) Bad Request." The strange thing is, though, I took those entries from another project that contacts the central server. That application has no problems contacting the central server using these settings. It's not a web page application, but I don't see how that would require these settings to change. I cannot tell what started causing these errors or when. I assume its something that changed outside of the application (e.g. the libraries referenced) that requires an update to the configuration in the application. I am currently using .NET 3.0 for all of my applications. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Unable to browse some pdfs and docs.

    - by JamesEggers
    I have a web site that uses Microsoft Indexing Service to index and query a directory that holds various documents of type pdf, rtf, mht, and doc. The indexing and querying works well (for the most part); however, some files will load while others will not. This is a Windows Server 2003 box running the site using IIS 6. The indexed directory is a sub directory off of the site's root directory (i.e. http://my.domain.com/files/). The file paths are accurate in the URL; however, I can only access some of the files of each file type. The files that I cannot access give a 404 File Not Found. I am able to open all files via windows explorer;however, attempting to open them via a browser over http is hit and miss. Has anyone experienced this issue and know how to resolve it? Anyone have any idea why I could access some files but not others? Does anyone have any recommendations on what to look into to try this (i.e. does owner matter or something like that?)? EDIT: Here is the Request and Response Headers for a bad file: GET /files/file1.pdf HTTP/1.1 Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/xaml+xml, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument, application/x-ms-xbap, application/x-ms-application, application/x-silverlight, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, / Accept-Language: en-us User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.590; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive Host: my.domain.com HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found Content-Length: 1635 Content-Type: text/html Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:38:54 GMT [typical 404 page markup excluded] Here is the Request/Response headers for the good file: GET /files/file2.pdf HTTP/1.1 Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/xaml+xml, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument, application/x-ms-xbap, application/x-ms-application, application/x-silverlight, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, / Accept-Language: en-us User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.590; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive Host: my.domain.com HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 352464 Content-Type: application/pdf Last-Modified: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:27:35 GMT Accept-Ranges: bytes ETag: "74ccc5759375c91:2a47" Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:50:33 GMT

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150  | Next Page >