Search Results

Search found 10248 results on 410 pages for 'mobile no validation in'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 144/410 | < Previous Page | 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151  | Next Page >

  • script attributes

    - by Alex Ivasyuv
    Hi, I need to control some script elements, that's why I want to add class attribute to do it. But, w3c says that it's invalid. Some effect, if I add rel or id attribute. Any other ideas how I can access appropriate script tag? Doctype: XHTML 1.0 Strict Thanks,

    Read the article

  • jQuery Validator - Dynamic Text

    - by James
    Adding a validator to my form: jQuery.validator.addMethod('whatever', function(val, el) { // whatever goes here }, 'A maximum of ' + $('#my_id_here').val() + ' categories can be selected.'); This doesn't fly. I always get undefined. Is this a good, simple way to do this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Jquery scroll to first instance of a class (.error) for jquerytools validator

    - by Tommy Arnold
    I am using jquerytools validator on a clients website but the page using this plugin is very long so I would like to add a custom handler using the folowing code. $("#form").bind("onFail", function(e, errors) { // we are only doing stuff when the form is submitted if (e.originalEvent.type == 'submit') { $(".errormsg").html("Please scroll up and fix the highlighted errors."); //alert("Please fix the highlighted errors to continue"); } }); How would I get it to scroll up to the first instance of .error? Can you recommend any plugins for this?

    Read the article

  • PHP displaying error for already used Username and empty field

    - by Pixel Reaper
    I want PHP to make sure the username is not already used and also check to see if the field is empty. Sorry I am a huge noob when it comes to php. Here is my code: // Check for an Username: $dup = mysql_query("SELECT user_username FROM users WHERE user_username='".$_POST['user_username']."'"); if(mysql_num_rows($dup) >0){ $errors[] = 'Username already used.'; } else{ $un = mysqli_real_escape_string($dbc, trim($_POST['user_username'])); echo '<b>Congrats, You are now Registered.</b>'; } else { $errors[] = 'You forgot to enter your Username.'; }

    Read the article

  • PHP reporting error. DB verify how to?

    - by iamfab
    Error reporting Notice: Undefined variable: random_chars in wamp\www\php_sandbox\idgen.php on line 21 Call Stack: # Time Memory Function Location 1 0.0045 678928 {main}( ) ..\idgen.php:0 GPB7446 How do I fix this error? Using this code like an automatic unique id generator. How do I connect to DB to verify code is truly unique before allowing it to be assigned to a user creating a new account? Thanks <?php $characters = array( "A","B","E","F","G","H","J","K","M","N","P","R","S","T","W","X","Y","Z"); $keys = array(); while(count($keys) < 3) { $x = mt_rand(0, count($characters)-1); if(!in_array($x, $keys)) { $keys[] = $x; } } foreach($keys as $key){ $random_chars .= $characters[$key];} $randNum = rand(2327,9987); $randLet = rand(2327,9987); echo $random_chars . $randNum; ?>

    Read the article

  • How does one validate an entire site?

    - by American Yak
    I realize there's the W3C validator, which works great for one page. There's also the perl install they provide, but it seems to not work on a Mac or it's buggy. Given that 1) I have an entire set of local files How do I a) Validate the entire set b) do it behind a firewall c) do it simply without installing anything on my computer? (i.e., is there a web service?) Or is this just futile?

    Read the article

  • Adding validations without knowing the fields

    - by Frexuz
    My example form <% form_for @ad do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages %> <p> <%= f.label :ad_type_id %><br /> <%= f.collection_select(:ad_type_id, AdType.all, :id, :name) %> </p> <p> <% @ad.ad_properties.each do |property| %> <%= property.name %>: <% f.fields_for :ad_values do |value_field| %> <%= value_field.text_field :ad_id, :value => @ad.id %> <%= value_field.text_field :ad_property_id, :value => property.id %> <%= value_field.text_field :value %> <% end %><br /><br /> <% end %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :description %><br /> <%= f.text_area :description %> </p> <p><%= f.submit %></p> <% end %> Explanation: Ad has many properties. I can add new properties at any time (it's a normal model). Lets say the Ad is of the type 'hotel'. Then I would add properties like 'stars' and 'breakfast_included' Then I store each of these properties' values in a separate model. And all this works fine with my form above. My problem: These fields are not validated because I can't know what their names are. I need to add validations dynamically somehow. My thought: #Before the normal validations kick in def add_validations self.properties.each do |property| property.add_validation :whatever #somehow :) end end How could I do this?

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc2 validate type double

    - by ile
    [MetadataType(typeof(Deal_Validation))] public partial class Deal { } public class Deal_Validation { [Required] public string Title { get; set; } public double? EstValue { set; get; } } How to validate EstValue (check if it is of type double?) Thanks

    Read the article

  • RegularExpressionValidator always fails, but ValidationExpression works in testing

    - by Jerph
    I found the answer to this, but it's a bit of a gotcha so I wanted to share it here. I have a regular expression that validates passwords. They should be 7 to 60 characters with at least one numeric and one alpha character. Pretty standard. I used positive lookaheads (the (?= operator) to implement it: (?=^.{7,60}$)(?=.*[0-9].*)(?=.*[a-zA-Z].*) I checked this expression in my unit tests using Regex.IsMatch(), and it worked fine. However, when I use it in a RegularExpressionValidator, it always fails. Why?

    Read the article

  • Why confirmation emails end up in the spam folder all of a sudden?

    - by nick2653
    I run a forum similar to this one where people can sign up and post. I don't use Open ID (oops?) as we have our own sign up and email confirmation system. Everything was going fine up until a week ago when all of a sudden all emails starting either going to spam boxes or not being sent at all. Anyone know why this would happen seeminlgy out of the blue?

    Read the article

  • simple method that checks text is email with regular expression

    - by user223863
    Can't believe how difficult this seems to be all I want to is to validate a user inout using javascript to make sure that it is an email address. But can't get it to work: I am using: //validates a regulaer expression Utilities2.prototype.validateEmail = function(stringToValidateArg) { alert('about to check regexp'); var regExpPattern = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,4}$/; alert(regExpPattern.test(stringToValidateArg)); } But this always returns false, any ideas why is it because of the regular expression?

    Read the article

  • Using user editable image URL in application. Security issues.

    - by sharas
    Hi there. I am writing an application where users are required to show their photo, however as my server resources are very limited I can not let them upload it to the server. So I have three major questions: 1. How to properly validate photo URL? At least I can validate with regexp, however I need to check for file ending: `validates_format_of :photo_url, :with => URI::regexp(%w(http https))` 2. Security issues? XSS? Even I validate the picture at the moment of creation, hacker can replace image with malicious stuff anytime. 3. Maybe there are free asset stores with API?

    Read the article

  • MySQL: How to check if a string is a valid DATE, TIME or DATETIME

    - by Svish
    When I try to put a value into a DATE field which is invalid, MySQL seems to use 0000-00-00 instead. Is there a way I can do this "check" without updating a DATE field? And to do it from for example PHP? Like, is there a way I can query the MySQL server and ask "Hey, is this DATE, TIME or DATETIME valid to you?" Or is there maybe an even better way of doing it?

    Read the article

  • Validate format of email in rails.

    - by piemesons
    validates_format_of :email, :with => /^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}" + @"\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\" + @".)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)/, :message => "is missing or invalid" Please let me know where is the problem? Is regular expression is wrong?

    Read the article

  • I want jQuery validator to add a class to the form element's parent

    - by Eystein
    How do I use jQuery validator to add/remove a classname (e.g. validate) on the form element's parent <li> so I can style everything related to that element by only setting the one classname? The markup is <li class="validate"> <label for="product">Product of interest <abbr title="Required field">*</abbr></label> <input id="product" type="text" name="product" value="" placeholder="e.g. school bench" class="required" minlength="2"> <!-- Hidden by CSS unless parent has 'validate' class --> <label for="product" class="description">Please name a product.</label> </li> and the default jQuery is $("#commentForm").validate();

    Read the article

  • asp.net regular expression not working as expected

    - by Zaps
    Hi, I have a textbox and a regular expression validator applied to it. I want to make sure that the only allowed string inputted into the textbox are "Anything Entered" or "Something Else" or "Another String" otherwise I want an error to be displayed. This is the regular expression I have so far: ValidationExpression="(^Anything Entered)$|(^Something Else)$ |(^Another String)$" However when I enter the supposed valid strings the error is displayed. I cant figure out whats wrong with the expression. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Zaps

    Read the article

  • How can I enter only numbers in TextBox using JavaScript without disable right click ?

    - by Space Cracker
    I want to allow numbers only to be allowed for a textbox and I already do it onkeydown event by allow only numbers and prevent ctrl+V but I have two problems : if I make right click then paste so any char can be entered and I want a solution without disable right click by oncontextmenu="return false;" if I drag and drop any text it will be entered Is there any solution that can work in all browsers without problem ?

    Read the article

  • [Rails] Accessing error_messages on form_tag

    - by aaronrussell
    I have built a custom form for creating a joining model on a has_many :through relationship. The models look roughly like this: class Team has_many :team_members has_many :members, :through => :team_members end class Member has_many :team_members has_many :teams, :through => :team_members end class TeamMember belongs_to :team belongs_to :member # and this model has some validations too end The form I have built is for selecting which members should be in a team. I won't paste the form, but it uses the form_tag method and basically sends an array of hashes which contain a member_id and a squad_number. I then update the database with an action that looks roughly like this (simplified a bit, but you get the jist): @team.transaction do @team.team_members = params[:team_members].collect{|tm| @team.team_members.new(tm)} if @team.save redirect_to ... else render :action => :members end end Everything works great but I am validating the squad_number for uniqueness and numerically. So, when any of those validations fail, how do I get access to them in my view, and how do I ascertain which of the many members it has failed on?

    Read the article

  • What is the best way for converting phone numbers into international format (E.164) using Java?

    - by Vihung
    What is the best way for converting phone numbers into international format (E.164) using Java? Given a 'phone number' and a country id (let's say an ISO country code), I would like to convert it into a standard E.164 international format phone number. I am sure I can do it by hand quite easily - but I would not be sure it would work correctly in all situations. Which Java framework/library/utility would you recommend to accomplish this? P.S. The 'phone number' could be anything identifiable by the general public - such as * (510) 786-0404 * 1-800-GOT-MILK * +44-(0)800-7310658 that last one is my favourite - it is how some people write their number in the UK and means that you should either use the +44 or you should use the 0. The E.164 format number should be all numeric, and use the full international country code (e.g.+44)

    Read the article

  • Why does isNaN(123.) return false?

    - by vivekraman
    Hi, Why does the Javascript function call isNaN(123.) return false? Is this a universally acceptable number or will it cause errors downstream? I'm validating whether a value is a valid decimal using isNaN along with split. Are there cross-browser issues with isNaN? Should I use a bespoke implementation? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Why does false invalidate validates_presence_of?

    - by DJTripleThreat
    Ok steps to reproduce this: prompt> rails test_app prompt> cd test_app prompt> script/generate model event_service published:boolean then go into the migration and add not null and default published to false: class CreateEventServices < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :event_services do |t| t.boolean :published, :null => false, :default => false t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :event_services end end now migrate your changes and run your tests: prompt>rake db:migrate prompt>rake You should get no errors at this time. Now edit the model so that you validate_presence_of published: class EventService < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :published end Now edit the unit test event_service_test.rb: require 'test_helper' class EventServiceTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase test "the truth" do e = EventServer.new e.published = false assert e.valid? end end and run rake: prompt>rake You will get an error in the test. Now set e.published to true and rerun the test. IT WORKS! I think this probably has something to do with the field being boolean but I can't figure it out. Is this a bug in rails? or am I doing something wrong?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151  | Next Page >