Search Results

Search found 34465 results on 1379 pages for 'database permissions'.

Page 148/1379 | < Previous Page | 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155  | Next Page >

• Pysdm has disabled my ability to write to my storage partition

  - by Atlas

  I have a dual boot setup with Windows 7 and Mint 13 Cinnamon. As well as their respective partitions I also have a large one (NTFS) for storing all my music, videos, documents etc. I downloaded pysdm as I was told it would enable me to configure Linux to auto-mount my storage partition. It has indeed been helpful in auto-mounting my storage. However, since installing it I can no longer write to the partition which makes 500GB of my hard drive utterly useless! I've tried to unselect the "Mount file system in read only mode" option, but the program keeps re-checking it after I close that window (and even when I click apply). Why is it doing this and how can I get it to recognise that I need to read AND write on that partition?

  Read the article

• Unable to copy files previously extracted from archives created on a Mac, even after claiming ownership

  - by Maxim Zaslavsky

  I reinstalled Windows on my computer today, and backed up my music to a USB drive. Now, I'm trying to copy the files onto my fresh Windows partition, but I'm unable to copy files that I obtained within my previous Windows installation from zip archives created on Macs. When I try to copy those previously-extracted files, I get an error saying that I need permission from S-1-5-21-...-1000 (a bizarre long ID). The first thing I tried was to take ownership of the files by setting my new user account as the owner, but that resulted in errors saying that I need permission from myself! Some Googling suggested adding antivirus suggestions, so I excluded the relevant folders from Microsoft Security Essentials, but the issue persists. For what it's worth, it seems that some program (so far I've only installed Chrome, Microsoft Security Essentials, and the latest Windows updates) created an empty folder named 601c8c7f0e0c03f725 at the root of my external USB hard drive. What gives?

  Read the article

• Limit which processes a user can restart with supervisor?

  - by dvcolgan

  I have used supervisor to manage a Gunicorn process running a Django site, though this question could pertain to anything being managed by supervisor. Previously I was the only person managing and using our server, and supervisor just ran as root and I would use sudo to run supervisorctl restart myapp when needed. Now our server has to support multiple users working on different sites, and each project needs to be able to restart their own gunicorn processes without being able to restart other users' processes. I followed this blog post: http://drumcoder.co.uk/blog/2010/nov/24/running-supervisorctl-non-root/ and was able to allow non-root users to use supervisorctl, but now anyone can restart anyone else's processes. From the looks of it, supervisor doesn't have a way of doing per-user access control. Anyone have any ideas on how to allow users to restart only their own processes without root?

  Read the article

• apache permission errors

  - by Wilduck

  I'm trying to set up Apache on a arch-linux box as a testing environment (I'm only using the localhost, not trying to serve anything to the greater web). When setting up Django with mod_wsgi, it recommended that I set up a WSGIScriptAlias from / to /usr/local/django/mysite/apache/django.wsgi . I've done this, as well as added the /usr/.../apache directory to my httpd.conf. When I try to access http://localhost I get a 403 forbidden error. I have no idea why this is happening. Things I've tried so far: 1) chown -R http .../apache 2) chmod -R 777 .../apache 3) using a simple Alias directive to host a static file from that directory. None of these have worked. I'm at a loss for what I'm doing wrong. Below is a relevant excerpt from my httpd.conf: Alias / /usr/local/django/mysite/apache <Directory "/usr/local/django/mysite/apache"> Order deny,allow Allow from all </Directory> So my question is: what am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• Why is setuid ignored on directories?

  - by Blacklight Shining

  On Linux systems, you can successfully chmod u+s $some_directory, but instead of forcing the ownership of new subdirectories and files to be the owner of the containing directory (and setting subdirectories u+s as well) as you might expect, the system just ignores the setuid bit. Subdirectories and files continue to inherit the UIDs of their creating processes, and subdirectories are not setuid by default. Why is setuid ignored on directories, and how can I get the system to recognize it?

  Read the article

• How can you make a Windows USB HDD Modify All for All Users

  - by David Allan Finch

  Hi, I use a USB HDD a lot between lots of different Windows Boxes. What I find after a while is that there get to be lots of different Permission on the files in some cases stopping me looking at files or removing them. They want Admin rights or even sometimes you need to put the disk back into the original machine with the original user. This is a right pain. Is there away of making the disk have Modify All for All Users and making this the default for all files on the disk. Thanks

  Read the article

• security issue of Linux sudo command?

  - by George2

  Hello everyone, 1. I am using Red Hat Enterprise 5 Linux box. I find if a user is in /etc/sudoers file, then if the user run command with sudo, the user will run this command with root privilege (without knowing root password, the user runs sudo only need to input the user's own password in order to run a command with sudo). Is that correct understanding? 2. If yes, then is it a security hole? Since users other than root could run with root privilege? thanks in advance, George

  Read the article

• Everyone can access my Windows 7 Homegroup file shares - Even Windows XP computers

  - by Adrian Grigore

  I have 3 computers in my network, two running Windows 7 and one running Windows XP. I've set up a homegroup on both Windows 7 computers. Also, all computers are in the same Workgroup. The problem is that one of the Windows 7 computers makes all shares accessible to the entire Workgroup instead of just sharing to the Homegroup as it should be. I created the file share in Windows 7 via right-click in the explorer, then click on "Share For" - "Homegroup (Read/Write)" (translated from German, so the actual wording may be different). Also, when I look at the file sharing properties of that folder, Windows Explorer informs me that Users must have a valid account and password for this Computer to access drive shares. Unfortunately this is not true. Being in the same Workgroup is enough to get access. Homegroup restrictions work as expected on my other Windows 7 computer. When trying to browse those shares from the XP computer, I get a dialog asking for a login and password. What might cause homegroup restrictions to fail and how can I fix this?

  Read the article

• Add multiple @groups to valid users

  - by skids89

  In smb.conf I have the line valid users = @Staff @Directors Is this a valid syntax to add two groups to the valid users line? It does not seem to work right on our xp pro clients. If not which of the following is the proper way (if any) to make two groups valid users of this network drive? Which is proper for windows clients? valid users = +Staff +Directors Or do I need to use the & valid users = &Staff &Directors Or some combo of the two? valid users = &+Staff &+Directors valid users = +&Staff +&Directors

  Read the article

• Changing User/Group to allow PHP to chmod/rename and move_upload_file()

  - by moe

  It seems like I cannot do anything with my PHP script on my VPS. It returns 'Permission denied' when I try to upload something to a directory. Yes, I have changed the permission to 777, and it works, but I do not like the insecurity When running the command: ps axu|grep apache|grep -v grep It returns nobody 7689 0.1 3.8 50604 20036 ? S 21:38 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL root 13600 0.0 3.8 50304 20348 ? Ss Jun06 0:46 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 15733 0.1 3.8 50700 20156 ? S 21:39 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 15818 0.1 3.8 51492 20180 ? S 21:39 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 23843 0.1 3.7 51336 19592 ? S 21:40 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30335 0.0 3.5 50436 18496 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30406 0.0 3.5 50444 18544 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30407 0.0 3.5 50556 18696 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30472 0.0 3.6 50828 19348 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30474 0.0 3.5 50668 18868 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30476 0.0 3.6 50532 19064 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30501 0.0 3.8 50556 20080 ? S 21:36 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32341 0.0 3.5 50444 18492 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32370 0.0 3.5 50444 18476 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32414 0.1 3.7 51336 19524 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32416 0.1 3.5 50668 18816 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32457 0.1 3.6 50828 19320 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32458 0.1 3.6 50772 19276 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32459 0.0 3.5 50444 18504 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32460 0.2 3.6 50828 19320 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32463 0.0 3.5 50444 18472 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32466 0.0 3.4 50436 17960 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL The owner of the directory is 'user [505]' and the group is 'user[508]' (as seen in WinSCP) What can I do to change the Apache Handler to the right owner and group to allow my PHP scripts to work? P.S My PHP is not set to safe mode, and the open_basedir is set to no value EDIT: This is what my httpd.conf looks like (for the associative domain) <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName domain.com ServerAlias www.domain.com DocumentRoot /home/domain/public_html ServerAdmin info@domain ## User <theUsername> # Needed for Cpanel::ApacheConf <IfModule mod_userdir.c> Userdir disabled Userdir enabled <userName> </IfModule> <IfModule mod_suphp.c> suPHP_UserGroup <userName> <userName> </IfModule> <IfModule !mod_disable_suexec.c> SuexecUserGroup <userName> <userName> </IfModule> CustomLog /usr/local/apache/domlogs/domain.com-bytes_log "%{%s}t %I .\n%{%s}t %O ." CustomLog /usr/local/apache/domlogs/domain.com combined ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/domain/public_html/cgi-bin/ #Options -ExecCGI -Includes #RemoveHandler cgi-script .cgi .pl .plx .ppl .perl

  Read the article

• Find permission problem on Windows 2003

  - by Tomas

  Hello, I am trying to run process(console executable) on remote PC from asp.net application using WMI and get "Access is denied" problem. I have checked all event viewer logs on remote PC, no information related this. Where do I start searching for problem? Does Windows has some kind of permission monitor tool? Also I have tried to use Procmon.exe but hard to understand what to search, my process even do not listed in Procmon. Regards, Tomas

  Read the article

• Tomcat deploy error

  - by David

  When deploying an application with the Tomcat manager I get the following error: FAIL - Failed to deploy application at context path /prademo Tomcat log shows: INFO: HTMLManager: install: Installing context configuration at '/home//webapps/PRA/META-INF/context.xml' from '/home//webapps/PRA' java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/dstefan/webapps/PRA/META-INF/context.xml (Permission denied) Permission to what? Both PRA and contex.xml have -rwxrwxrwx. Thanks!

  Read the article

• rsync command deletion error "IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion"

  - by Jam88

  I use rsync command to take backup of files from one of my ubuntu server to another ubuntu machine. Backup server trigger a script that use rysnc command. Here is the command I use rsync -rltvh --partial --stats --exclude=.beagle/ --exclude=.* --delete-after root@live_server:/home/ /home/live_server_backup/home /tmp/logfile.log 2&1 live_server is ssh-able without password. So it works. Now problem is with --delete-after option After all file synced .At the end I can see deletion procedure skipped.logfile error is like IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion When i tried to find log there were some error while file sync rsync: send_files failed to open "/home/xyz/Desktop/PPT_session_1_context.pdf": Permission denied (13) So my understanding is as rsync could not read all the files from target for safety reason it is skipping the file deletion. Is there any way to make --delete-after work even if there is some permission error? I do not want to use force deletion as it will be dangerous in some situation.

  Read the article

• Windows 7 loses access to network drives

  - by dubRun

  Ok this is an odd one, but is happening often enough its getting quite annoying. I recently installed Windows 7 on my work computer (about 2 months ago) and every so often I lose access to network shares on our work network. Its one server in particular - other shares are still working fine. I have a number of folders mapped as a drive, and all of the ones on a particular file server have lost access. If I try to access the machine directly (\fileserver\d$) it doesn't work either with this message: Windows cannot access \fileserver\d$. You do not have permission to access \fileserver\d$. Contact your network administrator to request access Once I reboot the computer, access is restored like it should be. The computers are all on a domain and my user has administrator level access to the server in question.

  Read the article

• Proper procedure - sftp access to www folder - To be able to upload files

  - by Jay

  My www folder is root:root. What should it be? My site works perfectly but maybe I am doing something wrong. My nginx.conf says user is 'nginx'. Should I be changing the www onwership and group to that or something else? Mainly I want to be able to sftp into the www folder using FileZilla. Preferably only allow access to the www folder. I want to be able to upload the website files but I just don't know the proper procedure. I have tried changing owners and groups but I get worried some part of the stack will not like it. For example does nginx play along, and php? I thought about having a sftp group or even an sftp user. But I don't want to go down a path that should be avoided. What should I be doing with my setup?

  Read the article

• Grant a user access to directories shared by root (mod: 770)

  - by Paul Dinham

  I want to grant a user (username: paul) access to all directories shared by root with mod 770. I do it this way: groups root (here comes a list of groups in which root user is) usermod -a -G group1 paul usermod -a -G group2 paul usermod -a -G group3 paul ... All the 'group1', 'group2', 'group3' are seen in the group list of root user. However, after adding 'paul' to all groups above, he still can not write to directories shared by root user with mod 770. Did I do it wrongly?

  Read the article

• How Do I Secure WordPress Blogs Against Elemento_pcx Exploit?

  - by Volomike

  I have a client who has several WordPress 2.9.2 blogs that he hosts. They are getting a deface kind of hack with the Elemento_pcx exploit somehow. It drops these files in the root folder of the blog: -rw-r--r-- 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 default.htm -rw-r--r-- 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 default.php -rw-r--r-- 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 index.asp -rw-r--r-- 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 index.aspx -rw-r--r-- 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 index.htm -rw-r--r-- 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 index.html -rwxr-xr-x 1 userx userx 1459 Apr 16 04:25 index.php* It overwrites index.php. A keyword inside each file is "Elemento_pcx". It shows a white fist with a black background and the phrase "HACKED" in bold letters above it. We cannot determine how it gets in to do what it does. The wp-admin password isn't hard, but it's also not very easy either. I'll change it up a little to show you what the password sort of looks like: wviking10. Do you think it's using an engine to crack the password? If so, how come our server logs aren't flooded with wp-admin requests as it runs down a random password list? The wp-content folder has no changes inside it, but is run as chmod 777 because wp-cache required it. Also, the wp-content/cache folder is run as chmod 777 too.

  Read the article

• Is there a serious issue with setting the SUID bit on tcpdump?

  - by Dean

  I'm running tcpdump on a remote machine, and piping the output to Wireshark on my local machine over SSH. In order to do this, I had to set the SUID bit on tcpdump. For background, the remote machine is an Amazon EC2 running "Amazon Linux AMI 2012.09". On this image, there is no root password, and it is not possible to log in as root. You can't use sudo without a TTY, and therefore you have to set the SUID. What are the practical risks of setting this bit on tcpdump? Is there any need to be paranoid? Should I unset it whenever I'm not capturing?

  Read the article

• locked files on HFS+ home partition shared between OSX/Linux

  - by HazyBlueDot

  I dual boot into Arch Linux and OS X 10.6 on my MacBook pro. I synced my UID between both OSes and created an HFS partition (with no journaling) to use as a shared home/Users partition. For the most part it works just as I'd expect, but sometimes when I'm booted into OS X certain files are "locked" (when I get info on a particular file the "Locked" box is checked under the "General" pane. I can resolve the issue by manually unchecking the box) and/or I get "Operation not permitted" when I try deleting or chmod'ing a file. In both cases I don't see anything out of the ordinary on the permission bits displayed with ls -l, except for a trailing '@' character in the position where the sticky bit would normally occur: -rw-r--r--@ 1 myuser mygroup 296 Mar 29 11:44 myfile This '@' character shows up on ALL normal files, so doesn't seem to be linked to the locked/operation not permission situation. On the Linux side of things I never have permission problems. To the best of my limited knowledge and experience with ACLs I've not found any ACLs on any of the files in question. For what it's worth, I do most of my file editing using emacs (Aquamacs in OSX), is it possible it is setting weird permission bits? What is the "locked" setting that OS X uses and does it have a permission bit equivalent (so at the very least I could recursively unlock all files in my home directory from the terminal) why might some, but not other files get "locked" when booting into OS X what is the meaning of the '@' character?

  Read the article

• Why is my firewall preventing me from accessing some websites

  - by nosx

  I have an old Belkin router and when I enable the firewall I cannot access certain websites. For example: http://www.avisynth.org With Firewall Enabled: Main page loads and begins to do a meta refresh which never finishes. With Firewall Disabled: Main page loads and the meta refresh completes as normal and I am taken to the wiki page. I have not setup any rules in my firewall that would prevent this site from loading, yet it refuses to load unless I have the firewall disabled completely. My router has a hidden page with advanced settings on it for the firewall which I was able to acccess and take a screenshot of, but I did not want to mess with these values unless I absolutely have to do so: What might be causing this problem and how would I go about fixing it?

  Read the article

• .htaccess authorization requiring username/password for every resource

  - by webworm

  I am using Apache2 on Ubuntu and I have having some "weird" user authorization issues. I am using .htaccess to control access to my directories. I have many users and have grouped them into user groups which are defined in a "group" file. I then use .htaccess within each directory to define which users have access to the directory and which do not. Here is an example .htaccess file. AuthUserFile /var/local/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /var/local/groups AuthName "Username and Password Required" AuthType Basic require group design admin Everything is working with one exception. I added a new user to one of my groups and though they can gain access to the directory they are prompted for a username and password for every resource (i.e. image, CSS). After a while I can just keep selecting "cancel" and I will get a page with just html with no images or CSS. I would think the browser would just cache the username/password. It seems to be working well for other users. Any thoughts?

  Read the article

• Changing User/Group to allow PHP to chmod/rename and move_upload_file()

  - by moe

  Hi There, It seems like I cannot do anything with my PHP script on my VPS. It returns 'Permission denied' when I try to upload something to a directory. Yes, I have changed the permission to 777, and it works, but I do not like the insecurity When running the command: ps axu|grep apache|grep -v grep It returns nobody 7689 0.1 3.8 50604 20036 ? S 21:38 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL root 13600 0.0 3.8 50304 20348 ? Ss Jun06 0:46 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 15733 0.1 3.8 50700 20156 ? S 21:39 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 15818 0.1 3.8 51492 20180 ? S 21:39 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 23843 0.1 3.7 51336 19592 ? S 21:40 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30335 0.0 3.5 50436 18496 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30406 0.0 3.5 50444 18544 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30407 0.0 3.5 50556 18696 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30472 0.0 3.6 50828 19348 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30474 0.0 3.5 50668 18868 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30476 0.0 3.6 50532 19064 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 30501 0.0 3.8 50556 20080 ? S 21:36 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32341 0.0 3.5 50444 18492 ? S 21:41 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32370 0.0 3.5 50444 18476 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32414 0.1 3.7 51336 19524 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32416 0.1 3.5 50668 18816 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32457 0.1 3.6 50828 19320 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32458 0.1 3.6 50772 19276 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32459 0.0 3.5 50444 18504 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32460 0.2 3.6 50828 19320 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32463 0.0 3.5 50444 18472 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 32466 0.0 3.4 50436 17960 ? S 21:42 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL The owner of the directory is 'user [505]' and the group is 'user[508]' (as seen in WinSCP) What can I do to change the Apache Handler to the right owner and group to allow my PHP scripts to work? P.S My PHP is not set to safe mode, and the open_basedir is set to no value

  Read the article

• Cannot delete audit logs with sudo

  - by DazSlayer

  I am using auditctl to log all commands run on my Ubuntu system and I working on a script that parses the log into a more readable format. Since these logs tend to become very large, I want to periodically delete the logs. I found that by running sudo rm /var/log/audit/* I would get rm: cannot remove `/var/log/audit/*': No such file or directory however by running sudo su rm /var/log/audit/* The logs would be deleted without any problem. What could be the cause of this?

  Read the article

• scp No such file or directory

  - by Joe

  I've a confusing question for which superuser doesn't seem to have a good answer, and neither google. I'm trying to scp a file from a remote server to my local machine. The command is this scp user@server:/path/to/source/file.gz /path/to/destination The error I get is: scp: /path/to/source/file.gz: No such file or directory user is my username on the server. The command syntax appears fine to me. ssh works fine and I can cd to the file and it doesn't seem to be an access control issue? Thanks; Edit: Thank you John. I spotted the issue. ls returned this: -r--r--r-- 1 nobody users 168967171 Mar 10 2009 /path/to/source/file.gz So, the file was on a read-only file system and user is able to read it but not scp. I just copied the file to a different directory and chown it and worked fine. It would be good if someone can explain why this is the case though.

  Read the article

• Why did windows change the elevation requirements of my AutoHotKey script, and how can I prevent such in the future?

  - by monsto

  I was working on an AutoHotKey (AHK) script to create prefab mouse movements for a very simple model viewer. I worked on it for a good hour. I zipped the script, posted it to a forum, and thought "oh hey, I should add bla bla bla to the script". When I returned to the program, the AHK script would not work. I could see the mouse movements working in other programs (notepad, chrome, etc), but not where I had been working the previous hour. After several hours of throwing darts at the troubleshooting wall, I discovered that the fix was to set the AHK.exe to Run as Administrator. The question here are multiple Why did Windows 7, in all it's wisdom, suddenly decide that elevation was necessary in the middle of usage? Can these permission requirements somehow be reverted by, say, removing a key from the registry or something? How can this kind of Windows behaviour be avoided in the future?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155  | Next Page >