Search Results

Search found 29809 results on 1193 pages for 'object notation'.

Page 149/1193 | < Previous Page | 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156  | Next Page >

• Exporting ActiveRecord objects into POROs

  - by Lucas d. Prim

  Hello, I'm developing a "script generator" to automatize some processes at work. It has a Rails application running on a server that stores all data needed to make the script and generates the script itself at the end of the process. The problem I am having is how to export the data from the ActiveRecord format to Plain Old Ruby Objects (POROs) so I can deal with them in my script with no database support and a pure-ruby implementation. I tought about YAML, CSV or something like this to export the data but it would be a painful process to update these structures if the process changes. Is there a simpler way? Ty!

  Read the article

• Is call to function object inlined?

  - by dehmann

  In the following code, Foo::add calls a function via a function object: struct Plus { inline int operator()(int x, int y) const { return x + y; } }; template<class Fct> struct Foo { Fct fct; Foo(Fct f) : fct(f) {} inline int add(int x, int y) { return fct(x,y); // same efficiency adding directly? } }; Is this the same efficiency as calling x+y directly in Foo::add? In other words, does the compiler typically directly replace fct(x,y) with the actual call, inlining the code, when compiling with optimizations enabled?

  Read the article

• How to call object's method from constructor?

  - by Kirzilla

  Hello, var Dog = function(name) { this.name = name; this.sayName(); } Dog.prototype.sayName = function() { alert(this.name); } I'm creating new instance of Dog object, but method sayName() is undefined. Why? Or maybe I should do something like (but I can't see difference)... var Dog = function(name) { this.name = name; this.prototype.sayName = function() { alert(this.name); } } Thank you.

  Read the article

• rais belong_to which class to choose

  - by Small Wolf

  There is a model relation like this. class A belongs_to :ref_config,:class_name => 'User' end My question is : the A has a attribute named flag, now i want to create a function like this: if flag == 1, I want the class A like this belongs_to :ref_config,:class_name => 'Department and if flag == 2, i want the class A like this belongs_to :ref_config,:class_name => 'User' How can I implement the function Thank you!

  Read the article

• Access sub-class object

  - by Amit

  There is a main class containing 2 sub-class(with some prop). If I create an obj of main class, will have access to sub-Class as well b/c we have property defined in main class. Is thr any way where I pass Main class.SubClass name then it will return that object only ? can we use indexer ? MainClass obj = new MainClass(); obj.SubClass1 or obj.SubClass2 ??? Thanks in adv... class MainClass { SubClass1 objSubclass1 = null; SubClass2 objSubclass2 = null; public MainClass() { objSubclass1 = new SubClass1(); objSubclass2 = new SubClass2(); } public SubClass1 SubClass1 {get {return objSubclass1;} } public SubClass2 SubClass2 {get {return objSubclass2;} } } Class SubClass1 { Some properties here... } Class SubClass2 { Some properties here... }

  Read the article

• How can I add multiple email addresses in Outlook field "To" via C#?

  - by misho

  Hi all, Anybody know how can I add multiple email addresses in Outlook field "To" via C#? foreach (var to in mailTo) newMail.To += to + "; "; When I try do it how I described this above I receive next kind of string: [email protected]@[email protected]

  Read the article

• Selecting one object from a one-to-many relationship in Hibernate

  - by Nick Thomson

  I have two tables: Job job_id, <other data> Job_Link job_link_id, job_id, start_timestamp, end_timestamp, <other data> There may be multiple records in Job_Link specifying the same job_id with the start_timestamp and end_timestamps to indicate when those records are considered "current", it is guaranteed that start_timestamp and end_timestamp will not overlap. We have entities for both the Job and Job_Link tables and defining a one-to-many relationship to load all the job_links wouldn't be a problem. However we'd like to avoid that and have a single job_link item in the Job entity that will contain only the "current" Job_Link object. Is there any way to achive that?

  Read the article

• CALayer not obeying object ownership rules?

  - by eaigner

  I have a custom CALayer - UIProgressLayer - for simulating a progress bar. There is a dispatched GC timer involved to animate its intermediate state. So thats the layer I'm talking about here, although i don't think the problem is restricted to this particular subclass because a CALayer with only the -release and -dealloc overridden produces the same outcome. The problem is when i send this layer, for instance, a theLayer.opacity = 0.5f a -release message is sent to the layer, thus deallocating my layer. Why is this happening? Has it something to do with how the whole CA system works? But it still has to obey the object ownership rules right? I was thinking maybe it creates a copy of that layer for the fading, but that's not the case.

  Read the article

• .NET Runtime Object Browser.

  - by user290907

  Is there a framework which can be used in your application, to make it expose internal objects on some port for inspection. for.e.g. after i start my application in this case a GUI Application, and then say launch http://localhost:9100 then it should show me the statistics of the app. I played a bit with HttpListener accepting connections and then outputting raw HTML, it works fine for simple tasks, but there is too much worked involved if i have make a proper object browser. Thanks in Advance.

  Read the article

• Shallow copy versus Deep Copy of user defined types.

  - by Codenotguru

  what is the difference between a shallow copy and deep copy with respect to user defined types and why do we need to perform a deep copy during copy construction for user defined types??

  Read the article

• What is the Rule of Thumb on Exposing Encapsulated Class Methods

  - by javamonkey79

  Consider the following analogy: If we have a class: "Car" we might expect it to have an instance of "Engine" in it. As in: "The car HAS-A engine". Similarly, in the "Engine" class we would expect an instance of "Starting System" or "Cooling System" which each have their appropriate sub-components. By the nature of encapsulation, is it not true that the car "HAS-A" "radiator hose" in it as well as the engine? Therefore, is it appropriate OO to do something like this: public class Car { private Engine _engine; public Engine getEngine() { return _engine; } // is it ok to use 'convenience' methods of inner classes? // are the following 2 methods "wrong" from an OO point of view? public RadiatorHose getRadiatorHose() { return getCoolingSystem().getRadiatorHose(); } public CoolingSystem getCoolingSystem() { return _engine.getCoolingSystem(); } } public class Engine { private CoolingSystem _coolingSystem; public CoolingSystem getCoolingSystem() { return _coolingSystem; } } public class CoolingSystem { private RadiatorHose _radiatorHose; public RadiatorHose getRadiatorHose() { return _radiatorHose; } } public class RadiatorHose {//... }

  Read the article

• how does an object knows about its parent in javascript

  - by alter

  Lets suppose I made a class called Person. var Person = function(fname){this.fname = fname;}; pObj is the object I made from this class. var pObj = new Person('top'); now I add one property to Person class, say lname. Person.prototype.lname = "Thomsom"; now pObj.lname gets me "Thomson". My question is that, when pObj didn't find the property lname in it, how does it know where to look for.

  Read the article

• Can't declare an abstract method private....

  - by Zombies

  I want to do this, yet I can't. Here is my scenario and rational. I have an abstract class for test cases that has an abstract method called test(). The test() method is to be defined by the subclass; it is to be implemented with logic for a certain application, such as CRMAppTestCase extends CompanyTestCase. I don't want the test() method to be invoked directly, I want the super class to call the test() method while the sub class can call a method which calls this (and does other work too, such as setting a current date-time right before the test is executed for example). Example code: public abstract class CompanyTestCase { //I wish this would compile, but it cannot be declared private private abstract void test(); public TestCaseResult performTest() { //do some work which must be done and should be invoked whenever //this method is called (it would be improper to expect the caller // to perform initialization) TestCaseResult result = new TestCaseResult(); result.setBeginTime(new Date()); long time = System.currentTimeMillis(); test(); //invoke test logic result.setDuration(System.currentTimeMillis() - time); return result; } } Then to extend this.... public class CRMAppTestCase extends CompanyTestCase { public void test() { //test logic here } } Then to call it.... TestCaseResult result = new CRMAppTestCase().performTest();

  Read the article

• benefit os having a factory for object creation?

  - by ajsie

  im trying to understand the factory design pattern. i dont understand why it's good to have a middleman between the client and the product (object that the client wants). example with no factory: $mac = new Mac(); example with a factory: $appleStore = new AppleStore(); $mac = $appleStore->getProduct('mac'); how does the factory pattern decouple the client from the product? could someone give an example of a future code change that will impact on example 1 negative, but positive in example 2 so i understand the importance of decoupling? thanks

  Read the article

• Return value of a JQuery autocomplete using an array of objects as its source

  - by user2920430

  In a JQuery autocomplete which uses an array of objects as its source, can I display the label in the INPUT and later access the value? The default behavior is that the value is displayed in the INPUT after selection. In this case the values represent indexes to unique keys in rows in a table. <!doctype html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>autocomplete demo</title> <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css"> <script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.9.1.js"></script> <script src="http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/jquery-ui.js"></script> </head> <body> <label for="autocomplete">Select a programming language: </label> <input id="autocomplete"> <script> $( "#autocomplete" ).autocomplete({ source: [ { label:"c++", value:1 }, { label: "java", value:2 }, { label: "javascript", value:3 } ] }); </script> </body> </html>

  Read the article

• Creating objects and referencing before saving object to db

  - by Flexo

  Sorry about the vague title, but i didnt know how to ask the question in one line :) I have an order with nested itemgroups that again have nested items. the user specify the amount of item that he would like to have in each itemgroup. I would like to create these items in the create method of the orders controller when the order itself is being created. I kinda have 2 problems here. First, how do i set the reference of the items, or better yet, put the items into the @order object so they are saved when the @order is saved? the items are being stored in the db as the code is now, but the reference is not set because the order is not stored in the db yet so it doesnt have an id yet. Second, im not sure im using the correct way to get the id from my itemgroup. @order = Order.new(params[:order]) @order.itemgroups.each do |f| f.amount.times do @item = Item.new() @item.itemgroup_id = f.id @item.save end end

  Read the article

• Simple OOP-related question.

  - by M4design

  This question came to my mind quite a few times. Let my explain my question through an example. Say I've got two classes: 1- Grid. 2- Cell. Now the location of the cell 'should' be stored in the grid class, not in the cell class itself. Say that the cell wanted to get its location through a method in the grid. How can it do that? Keep in mind that the cell was created/initialised by the Grid class. What good OO approach to solve this problem? Thank you

  Read the article

• c# - best way to initialize an array of reference type object

  - by lidong

  I wonder if there is better way to initialize an array of reference type object, like this. Queue<int>[] queues = new Queue<int>[10]; for (int i = 0; i < queues.Length; i++) { queues[i] = new Queue<int>(); } I tried Enumerable.Repeat, but all elements in the array refer to same instance, Queue<int>[] queues = Enumerable.Repeat(new Queue<int>(), 10).ToArray(); I also tried Array.ForEach, but it doesn't work without ref keyword: Queue<int>[] queues = Array.ForEach(queues, queue => queue = new Queue<int>()); any other idea?

  Read the article

• Store date object in sqlite database

  - by bnabilos

  Hello, I'm using a database in my Java project and I want to store date in it, the 5th and the 6th parameter are Date Object. I used the solution below but I have errors in these 2 lines : creerFilm.setDate(5, new Date (getDateDebut().getDate())); creerFilm.setDate(6, new Date (getDateFin().getDate())); PreparedStatement creerFilm = connecteur.getConnexion().prepareStatement("INSERT INTO FILM (ID, REF, NOM, DISTRIBUTEUR, DATEDEBUT, DATEFIN) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)"); creerFilm.setInt(1, getId()); creerFilm.setString(2, getReference()); creerFilm.setString(3, getNomFilm()); creerFilm.setString(4, getDistributeur()); creerFilm.setDate(5, new Date (getDateDebut().getDate())); creerFilm.setDate(6, new Date (getDateFin().getDate())); creerFilm.executeUpdate(); creerFilm.close(); Can you help me to fix that please ? Thank you

  Read the article

• Create an object with javascript reflection?

  - by acidzombie24

  I am doing something wrong. At the end of this o is empty. I want to pass in a string such as a=3&zz=5 and do o.a and o.zz to retrieve 3 and 5. How do i generate this object? function MakeIntoFields_sz(sz) { var kvLs = sz.split('&'); var o = new Array(); for (var kv in kvLs) { var kvA = kvLs[kv].split('='); var k = ''; var v = ''; if (kvA.length > 0) { k = kvA[0]; if (kvA.length > 1) v = kvA[1]; o[k] = v; } } return o; };

  Read the article

• Making a many-to-many relationship using DataRelations object

  - by dotnetdev

  Hi, I have about 200 tables which need to relate to another table in a many-to-many fashion. I have the tables (including the intersection table) ready IN SQL Server. How can I write code using the data relation object to make the relationship? The tables are: PartStatPartName PartsMaterialsIntersection << Materials The materials table needs to have a foreign key from the PartStatPartName table. I tried various approaches using the DataRelation class but the change did not sync to SQL Server, despite being connected and adding the relation, and then calling AcceptChanges() on the dataset. Any guidance much appreciated. I have seen some threads covering the same problem but need an example in code so I can follow the right method. Thanks

  Read the article

• C#, get all collection properties from an object

  - by Eatdoku

  Hi, I have a class with 3 List collections like the following. I am trying to have a logic which will iterate through the object's "collection" properties and do some operation using the data stored in those collections. I am just wondering if there is an easy way of doing it using foreach. thanks public class SampleChartData { public List<Point> Series1 { get; set; } public List<Point> Series2 { get; set; } public List<Point> Series3 { get; set; } public SampleChartData() { Series1 = new List<Point>(); Series2 = new List<Point>(); Series3 = new List<Point>(); } }

  Read the article

• What are the differences between struct and class in C++

  - by palm3D

  This question was already asked in the context of C#/.Net. Now I'd like to learn the differences between a struct and a class in (unmanaged) C++. Please discuss the technical differences as well as reasons for choosing one or the other in OO design. I'll start with an obvious difference: If you don't specify public: or private:, members of a struct are public by default; members of a class are private by default. I'm sure there are other differences to be found in the obscure corners of the C++ specification.

  Read the article

• Sending a Java object from my Android phone to my Computer

  - by TehGoose

  Hi, I was wondering what the simplest program for sending an object from my Andriod phone to my computer wirelessly (via LAN) would be. I have created Java RMI programs with a server and multiple clients, so I have a grasp of the concept. However with android I'm just not sure where to start. What I am aiming to do is send some sort of information (could simply be text) to my computer and my computer will do an action. I have the GUI interface's and the actions to be carried out all worked out, just the sending of some sort of information is getting me. Could anyone help me out?

  Read the article

• Help needed to assign the value of an object of array to a variable

  - by user594861

  Hi All, This is my code: int random=0; int counter=0; while(counter<25) { random=arc4random() % 40; BOOL flag=[array containsObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:random] ]; if(flag) { counter--; } else { [array addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:random]]; int p=[array objectAtIndex:counter]; //**line4 counter++; } } getting a warning on line 4, not able to assign the value of an object of an array to a variable, please help me Thanks

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156  | Next Page >