Search Results

Search found 34715 results on 1389 pages for 'carriage return'.

Page 15/1389 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • finally and return

    - by abson
    In the below example, class ex8 { public void show() { try { int a=10/0; return;} catch(ArithmeticException e) { System.out.println(e); return ;} finally { System.out.println("Finally"); } } public static void main(String[] args) { new ex8().show(); } } the output is: java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero Finally How is it that Finally gets printed in spite of return statement in catch?

    Read the article

  • Rewrite SQL Fulltext Function to return Table only

    - by Alex
    I have a MS SQL Fulltext Function like this: (...) RETURNS TABLE AS RETURN SELECT * FROM fishes INNER JOIN CONTAINSTABLE(fishes, *, @keywords, @limit) AS KEY_TBL ON fishes.id = KEY_TBL.[KEY] When I use this function in LINQ, it generates a special return type which includes all fields of my "fishes" table, plus Key and Rank. How could I rewrite above query, or change something in LINQ, to omit Key and Rank and just return my "fishes" results (and to have the fulltext search result objects be of type Fish, which is what I really care about, so I don't have to cast)?

    Read the article

  • Puzzle: Overload a C++ function according to the return value

    - by Motti
    We all know that you can overload a function according to the parameters: int mul(int i, int j) { return i*j; } std::string mul(char c, int n) { return std::string(n, c); } Can you overload a function according to the return value? Define a function that returns different things according to how the return value is used: int n = mul(6, 3); // n = 18 std::string s = mul(6, 3); // s = "666" // Note that both invocations take the exact same parameters (same types) You can assume the first parameter is between 0-9, no need to verify the input or have any error handling.

    Read the article

  • Return in catch block?

    - by lowlyintern
    Is is wrong to have a return statement in a catch block? What are the alternatives? i.e: public bool SomeFunction() { try { //somecode return true; } catch(Exception ex) { MessageBox.Show(ex.message); return false; } }

    Read the article

  • How to return a string literal from a function

    - by skydoor
    Hi I am always confused about return a string literal or a string from a function. I was told that there might be memory leak because you don't know when the memory will be deleted? For example, in the code below, how to implement foo() so that make the output of the code is "Hello World"? void foo ( ) // you can add parameters here. { } int main () { char *c; foo ( ); printf ("%s",c); return 0; } Also if the return type of foo() is not void, but you can return char*, what should it be.

    Read the article

  • Return value changed after finally

    - by Nestor
    I have the following code: public bool ProcessData(String data) { try { result= CheckData(data); if (TextUtils.isEmpty(result)) { summary="Data is invalid"; return false; } ... finally { Period period = new Period(startTime, new LocalDateTime()); String duration = String.format("Duration: %s:%s", period.getMinutes(), period.getSeconds()); LogCat(duration); } return true; As I learned from this question, the finally block is executed after the return statement. So I modified my code according to that, and in the finally I inserted code that does not modify the output. Strangely, the code OUTSIDE the finally block does. My method always returns true. As suggested, it is not a good idea to have 2 return. What should I do?

    Read the article

  • How to return xml from .net webservice

    - by kaibuki
    Hi Guys!! I am reading data and filling a data set and want to return xml, in a .net web service. so far I am trying to use return mydataset.getxml(); but it is not helping as my method return type is "DataSet" so is there any way I can get a well formatted xml. Thanks

    Read the article

  • C++ Function Template With Flexible Return Type

    - by Ignatius Reza
    Let's say that we have a function like so template <class T, class T2> T getMin(T a, T2 b) { if(a < b) return a; return b; } if we call the function like so int a, b; long c; a = getMin(b, c); if c is < a, then the value of c will be type casted to int. Is it possible to make the return type flexible so that it would return an int, or long, or any other type considered smaller by "<" without being type casted?

    Read the article

  • Struts:JSON:return multiple objects

    - by cp
    Hello Is it possible to return multiple JSON objects in the request header with Struts1? I am presently returning a single JSON objects, however the need now is to return a second data structure. All the client-side processing works perfectly for the single data structure in the single JSON objects, I really do not want to complicate it by putting two hetrogenous data structures in a single return JSON object. tia.

    Read the article

  • Adapting methods which return true/false

    - by James P.
    What's the best practise when adapting C-style functions which return a true/false to Java? Here's a simple method to illustrate where the problem lies. public static boolean fileNameEndsWithExtension( String filename, String fileExtension) { return filename.endsWith( fileExtension ); } Note that there's probably a more elegant way of filtering files (feel free to comment on this). Anyway, if filename is a null value, does one: Return a false if filename is null? If so, how does one go about distinguishing between the case where filename is null and the case where the String or file name doesn't end with a given file extension? Change the return type to the wrapper class Boolean which allows a null value. Throw an Exception and force the programmer to make sure that a null value is never passed to the method? Use another solution?

    Read the article

  • conflicting types for a function return in C

    - by Adi
    Hi all, Here is my question : I am doing a recursive program and I am getting an error saying conflicting types: Code is : void* buddyMalloc(int req_size) { //Do something here// return buddy_findout(original_index,req_size); //This is the recursive fn I call// } void *buddy_findout(int current_index,int req_size) { char *selected = NULL; if(front!=NULL) { if(current_index==original_index) { //Do something here// return selected ; // } else { //Do Something here// return buddy_findout(current_index+1,req_size); } } else { return buddy_findout(current_index-1,req_size); } } In the above code , "I am getting error like : conflicting types of buddy_findout " Thanks for the help in advance aditya

    Read the article

  • Returning new base class when the parent class shared pointer is the return type

    - by Ben Dol
    Can you have a parent class shared pointer return type of a function and then return a new child class without it being a shared pointer? I'm not sure how shared pointers work in these situations, do they act like a regular pointer? Here is my example: BaseEventPtr Actions::getEvent(const std::string& nodeName) { if(asLowerCaseString(nodeName) == "action") return new ActionEvent(&m_interface); return nullptr; } ActionEvent is the subclass of BaseEvent in this situation. Cheers!

    Read the article

  • What to return when making an Ajax request

    - by Russell
    When we return data from an Ajax call, is it better to return a document containing HTML to display on the page or return an Xml/json data which can be processed? I know different circumstances may determine what 'better' means, but I really want to know which will be more appropriate for different circumstances. I am working on the framework for a large ASP .Net application, using jQuery Ajax (forms plugin). My initial thought was to return the data as Xml, then process accordingly. Then this increases processing required in Javascript, to populate the page. I am trying to balance flexible, clear and simple. Thanks in advance for your knowledge and information.

    Read the article

  • return false is not working in my submit click

    - by kumar
    Hello friends. this is the code i am using for my Html.BeginForm.. $('#PbtnSubmit').click(function() { $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]').each(function() { if ($("#PricingEditExceptions input:checkbox:checked").length > 0) { var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[type=checkbox]:checked'); var PMstrIDs = checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); $('#1_exceptiontypes').attr('value', exceptiontypes) $('#1_PMstrIDs').attr('value', PMstrIDs); } else { alert("Please select atleast one exception"); return false; } }); }); in else blcok my return false is not working after alert mesage also its going to my controler? thanks is this right? i tried like this $('#PbtnSubmit').click(function() { $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]').each(function() { if ($("#PricingEditExceptions input:checkbox:checked").length > 0) { var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[type=checkbox]:checked'); var PMstrIDs = checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); $('#1_exceptiontypes').attr('value', exceptiontypes) $('#1_PMstrIDs').attr('value', PMstrIDs); } else { alert("Please select atleast one exception"); } }); return false; }); if i do like this on submit its doing nothing.. thanks

    Read the article

  • IF/ELSE makes stored procedure not return a result set

    - by Brendan Long
    I have a stored procedure that needs to return something from one of two databases: IF @x = 1 SELECT @y FROM Table_A ELSE IF @x = 2 SELECT @y FROM Table_B Either SELECT alone will return what I want, but adding the IF/ELSE makes it stop returning anything. I tried: IF @x = 1 RETURN SELECT @y FROM Table_A ELSE IF @x = 2 RETURN SELECT @y FROM Table_B But that causes a syntax error. The two options I see are both horrible: Do a UNION and make sure that only one side has any results: SELECT @y FROM Table_A WHERE @x = 1 UNION SELECT @y FROM Table_B WHERE @x = 2 Create a temporary table to store one row in, and create and delete it every time I run this procedure (lots). Neither solution is elegant, and I assume they would both be horrible for performance (unless MS SQL is smart enough not to search the tables when the WHERE class is always false). Is there anything else I can do? Is option 1 not as bad as I think?

    Read the article

  • Function return type style

    - by JB
    I'm learning c++0x, at least the parts supported by the Visual C++ Express 2010 Beta. This is a question about style rather than how it works. Perhaps it's too early for style and good practice to have evolved yet for a standard that isn't even released yet... In c++0x you can define the return type of a method using - type at the end of the function instead of putting the type at the start. I believe this change in syntax is required due to lambdas and some use cases of the new decltype keyword, but you can use it anywhere as far as I know. // Old style int add1(int a, int b) { return a + b; } // New style return type auto add2(int a, int b) -> int { return a + b; } My question really then, is given that some functions will need to be defined in the new way is it considered good style to define all functions in this way for consistency? Or should I stick to only using it when necessary?

    Read the article

  • Catching the return of main function before it deallocates resources

    - by EpsilonVector
    I'm trying to implement user threads in Linux kernel 2.4, and I ran into something problematic and unexpected. Background: a thread basically executes a single function and dies, except that when I call thread_create for the first time it must turn main() into a thread as well (by default it is not a thread until the first call, which is also when all the related data structures are allocated). Since a thread executes a function and dies, we don't need to "return" anywhere with it, but we do need to save the return value to be reclaimed later with thread_join, so the hack I came up with was: when I allocate the thread stack I place a return address that points to a thread_return_handler function, which deallocates the thread, makes it a zombie, and saves its return value for later. This works for "just run a function and die" threads, but is very problematic with the main thread. Since it actually is the main function, if it returns before the other threads finish the normal return mechanism kicks in, and deallocates all the shared resources, thus screwing up all the running threads. I need to keep it from doing that. Any ideas on how it can be done?

    Read the article

  • Can't return nil, but zero value of slice

    - by Sergi
    I am having the case in which a function with the following code: func halfMatch(text1, text2 string) []string { ... if (condition) { return nil // That's the final code path) } ... } is returning []string(nil) instead of nil. At first, I thought that perhaps returning nil in a function with a particular return type would just return an instance of a zero-value for that type. But then I tried a simple test and that is not the case. Does anybody know why would nil return an empty string slice?

    Read the article

  • Return http 204 "no content" to client in ASP.NET MVC2

    - by Jeremy Raymond
    In an ASP.net MVC 2 app that I have I want to return a 204 No Content response to a post operation. Current my controller method has a void return type, but this sends back a response to the client as 200 OK with a Content-Length header set to 0. How can I make the response into a 204? [HttpPost] public void DoSomething(string param) { // do some operation with param // now I wish to return a 204 no content response to the user // instead of the 200 OK response }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >