Search Results

Search found 1064 results on 43 pages for 'eval'.

Page 15/43 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • change value upon select

    - by Link
    what i'm aiming is to show the other div when it selects one of the two options Full time and Part Time and if possible compute a different value for each When the user selects Part time the value of PrcA will change to PrcB this is the code i used <!====================================================================================> <script language="javascript"> <!--// function dm(amount) { string = "" + amount; dec = string.length - string.indexOf('.'); if (string.indexOf('.') == -1) return string + '.00'; if (dec == 1) return string + '00'; if (dec == 2) return string + '0'; if (dec > 3) return string.substring(0,string.length-dec+3); return string; } function calculate() { QtyA = 0; TotA = 0; PrcA = 1280; PrcB = 640; if (document.form1.qtyA.value > "") { QtyA = document.form1.qtyA.value }; document.form1.qtyA.value = eval(QtyA); TotA = QtyA * PrcA; document.form1.totalA.value = dm(eval(TotA)); Totamt = eval(TotA) ; document.form1.GrandTotal.value = dm(eval(Totamt)); } //--> </script> <!====================================================================================> <p> <label for="acct" style="margin-right:90px;"><strong>Account Type<strong><font color=red size=3> * </font></strong></label> <select name="acct" style="background-color:white;" class="validate[custom[serv]] select-input" id="acct" value=""> <option value="Full Time">Full-Time</option> <option value="Part Time">Part-Time</option> <option selected="selected" value=""></option> </select></p> <!====================================================================================> <script> $(document).ready(function() { $("input[name$='acct']").select(function() { var test = $(this).val(); $("div.desc").hide(); $("#acct" + test).show(); }); }); </script> <!====================================================================================> <p> <table><tr><td> <lable style="margin-right:91px;"># of Agent(s)<font color=red size=3> * </font></lable> </td><td> <input style="width:25px; margin-left:5px;" type="text" class="validate[custom[agnt]] text-input" name="qtyA" id="qtyA" onchange="calculate()" /> </td><td> <div id="acctFull Time" class="desc"> x 1280 = </div> <div id="acctPart Time" class="desc" style="display:none"> x 640 = </div> </td><td> $<input style="width:80px; margin-left:5px;" type="text" readonly="readonly" name="totalA" id="totalA" onchange="calculate()" /> </p> </td></tr></table> is there any way for me to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • Would you refactor this and if so, would you charge your client?

    - by Julius
    I am working on a freelance job at home. The client wants me to write some new functionality for his CMS, but it is taking me a lot of time to figure out what the code is doing, because it is written in a very unreadable style. Below is just an example of what I mean. The previous programmer made extensive use of anonymous functions, of eval(), he uses deeply nested ternary operators, he didn't indent code, didn't use comments, and he uses funny constructions like misusing the behaviour of logical operators || and && for creating if/else conditions (the second condition of && only gets tested if the first one is true, opening the possibility to use && as an if/else construction). All in all it's insane code and it's costing me a lot of time to find out how the current code works. return ($this->main->context != "ajax" || in_array($this->type, $this->definition->ajax)) ? eval('return method_exists($this,"Show'.ucfirst($this->type).'") ? $this->Show'.ucfirst($this->type).'('.(count($args) ? join(",",array_map(create_function('$a','return (is_numeric($a) || preg_match("/^array/",$a)) ? $a : "\"".$a."\"";'),$args)) : "").') : null;') : ''; Would you refactor this code and how would you handle this sort of thing with your client, I mean financially?

    Read the article

  • Infragistics UltraWebTab

    - by user354089
    Im using Infragistcs UltraWebTab. The code is shown below ` <div class="tab-content"> <asp:Panel ID="PnlGeneral" runat="server"> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="tab-list"> <tr> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Label ID="LblErrors" runat="server" CssClass="ErrorMessage1"></asp:Label> <asp:Label ID="LblSuccessMsg" runat="server" CssClass="SuccessMessage1"></asp:Label> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" border="0" class="tab-list"> <tr> <th width="205" class="FormLabel1"> Campaign Name <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td width="80%"> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtCampaignName" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox> </td> </tr> <tr> <th width="205" class="FormLabel1"> CRM Name <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td width="80%"> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtCRMName" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox> </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> Campaign Type <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:DropDownList ID="DDLCampaignType" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1" AutoPostBack="true" Width="117px" OnSelectedIndexChanged="DDLCampaignType_SelectedIndexChanged"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> </tr> <tr visible="false" id="trCompanyRow" runat="server"> <th class="FormLabel1"> Company <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"> <tr> <td class="style2" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:DropDownList ID="DDLCompany" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1" Width="117px" OnSelectedIndexChanged="DDLCompany_SelectedIndexChanged"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> <td class="style3" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:LinkButton ID="btnlnknewCompany" runat="server" Style="font-size: 100%;" Text="Add New" OnClick="btnlnknewCompany_Click"></asp:LinkButton> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%" id="tdNewComapny" visible="false" runat="server"> <tr> <td class="style4" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:TextBox ID="txtCompanyName" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Button ID="btnCompanyAdd" runat="server" CssClass="btn1" Height="20px" Text="Add" Width="25%" OnClick="btnCompanyAdd_Click" /> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> <tr id="trBannerImage" runat="server" visible="false"> <th class="FormLabel1"> Banner Image <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:FileUpload ID="FileUploadBannerImage" runat="server" ToolTip="Add images for banner" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> Start Date <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtStartDate" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox><rjs:PopCalendar ID="CalStartDate" runat="server" Control="TxtStartDate" Format="dd mm yyyy" ShowErrorMessage="false" /> &nbsp;dd-mm-yyyy </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> End Date <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtEndDate" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox><rjs:PopCalendar ID="CalEndDate" runat="server" Control="TxtEndDate" Format="dd mm yyyy" ShowErrorMessage="false" /> &nbsp;dd-mm-yyyy </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> Enabled? </th> <td> <asp:CheckBox ID="ChkEnabled" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> <tr style="border-bottom-color: White" id="tblVerificationFields" visible="false" runat="server"> <th style="border-bottom-color: White"> Company's Verification Fields </th> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="tab-form" width="100%"> <tr> <td colspan="3" align="center"> <br /> <p> <label style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; text-align: center;"> Select from existing verification fields below</label></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <asp:Repeater ID="RptrVeriFieldsParamType" runat="server"> <HeaderTemplate> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tab-grid" style="border: 0px"> <tr> <th> </th> <th> Field Name </th> <th> Type </th> <th> </th> </tr> </HeaderTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <tr> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:CheckBox ID="RptrChkVeriFields" runat="server" /> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Label ID="RptrFieldName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("FieldName") %>'> </asp:Label> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Label ID="RptrParamterTypeName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("PARAMETERTYPENAME") %>'> </asp:Label> </td> <td> <asp:Label ID="RptrHdnFieldId" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("FIELDID") %>' Visible="false"></asp:Label> </td> </tr> </ItemTemplate> <FooterTemplate> </table> </FooterTemplate> </asp:Repeater> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" runat="server"> <tr> <td colspan="6" style="border-bottom-color: White" align="center"> <br /> <p> <label style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; width: 100%;"> Or Add New verification field</label> </p> </td> </tr> <tr id="trVerifcationFields" runat="server" visible="false"> <th style="border-bottom-color: White" width="110px"> <strong>Verification Name</strong> </th> <td style="border-bottom-color: White" width="50px"> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtVeriField" runat="server"> </asp:TextBox> </td> <th style="border-bottom-color: White" width="100px"> <strong>Parameter Type</strong> </th> <td style="border-bottom-color: White" width="100px"> <asp:DropDownList ID="DDLParameterType" runat="server"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> <th> </th> <td align="left" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Button ID="BtnAddVeriField" runat="server" CssClass="btn1" Height="20px" Text="Add" OnClick="BtnAddVeriField_Click" Width="75%" /> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" border="0" class="tab-list"> <tr align="right"> <td> </td> <td align="right" class="tab-list"> <asp:Button runat="server" ID="Next" Visible="true" Text="Next >" CssClass="btn" /> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> </div> </ContentTemplate> </igtab:Tab> <igtab:Tab Text="CRM Deals (Step-2)" Key="Tab2"> <ContentTemplate> <div style="clear: both"> </div> <div class="tab-content"> <asp:Panel ID="PnlCRMDeals" runat="server" ScrollBars="Vertical" Height="500px"> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="tab-list"> <tr> <td> <asp:GridView ID="GridDeals" AutoGenerateColumns="False" runat="server" BorderStyle="none" BorderWidth="0" CellPadding="0" CellSpacing="0" GridLines="None" ShowFooter="false" HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="tab-grid" Width="100%"> <HeaderStyle CssClass="header" HorizontalAlign="Center" /> <PagerStyle CssClass="pager" /> <AlternatingRowStyle CssClass="odd" /> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField> <ItemStyle Width="5%" /> <ItemTemplate> <asp:CheckBox ID="ChkDeals" runat="server" Visible="true" /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Deal Name"> <ItemStyle Width="25%" /> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="DealName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("DealName") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Name in CRM"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="CRMDealName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("CRM_NAME") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Deal Code"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="PartNum" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("PARTNUM") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> </asp:GridView> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> </div> </ContentTemplate> </igtab:Tab> ` The problem im facing is after the "BtnAddVeriField" add button is clicked the Panel for the next tab gets displayed below the first tab's Panel. Furthermore, that Add button is not displayed as well.

    Read the article

  • Telerik RadGrid inside of ToolTip inside of RadGrid

    - by lowerkey
    Right now I have a RadToolTip inside of a RadGrid. The RadGrid displays a field from the datasource called "Value". The RadToolTip displays the same thing. I want to add another RadGrid inside of the RadToolTip. The function setting up the datasource of that second RadGrid should take "Value" as a parameter? How do I do that? Here's what I have so far. <h2>Currently Assigned Tags</h2> <telerik:RadGrid runat="server" ID="grdTags" OnNeedDataSource="grdTags_NeedDataSource" AllowMultiRowSelection="true" AutoGenerateColumns="false" OnDeleteCommand="DeleteTag" Skin="CiscoGreen" EnableEmbeddedSkins="false"> <ClientSettings> <Selecting AllowRowSelect="true" /> </ClientSettings> <MasterTableView DataKeyNames="KeywordID"> <Columns> <telerik:GridButtonColumn ButtonType="LinkButton" Text="Delete" CommandName="Delete" /> <telerik:GridBoundColumn Visible="false" DataField="KeywordID" /> <telerik:GridBoundColumn HeaderText="Value" DataField="Value" /> <telerik:GridTemplateColumn UniqueName="ToolTip"> <HeaderTemplate> Related Campaigns </HeaderTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label runat="server" ID="TargetLabel" Text='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Value") %>' /> <telerik:RadToolTip ID="ttRelatedCampaigns" runat="server" Width="300px" Height="300px" TargetControlID="TargetLabel"> <%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Value") %> <telerik:RadGrid ID="grdRelatedCampaigns" runat="server" OnNeedDataSource='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Value") %>' AutoGenerateColumns="false" Skin="CiscoGreen" EnableEmbeddedSkins="false"> <MasterTableView DataKeyNames="InitiativeName"> <Columns> <telerik:GridBoundColumn HeaderText="Campaign Name" DataField="Value" /> </Columns> </MasterTableView> </telerik:RadGrid> </telerik:RadToolTip> </ItemTemplate> </telerik:GridTemplateColumn> </Columns> </MasterTableView> </telerik:RadGrid>

    Read the article

  • Weird exception in linkbutton in a datalist

    - by user308806
    Dear all, I have written this datalist : <div class="story" runat="server"> <asp:DataList ID="DataList2" runat="server" Height="16px" Width="412px"> <SeparatorTemplate> <hr /> </SeparatorTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="LinkButton1" runat ="server" Text='<%# Eval("Name") %>' PostBackUrl='<%#Eval("Url")%>' /> <br /> Description: <asp:Label ID="new" Text='<%#Eval("Description") %>' runat="server" /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:DataList> </div> It raises an exception saying that the linkbutton has to be placed in a tag that contains runat="server" although it exists. Here is the trace [HttpException (0x80004005): Le contrôle 'DataList2_ctl00_LinkButton1' de type 'LinkButton' doit être placé dans une balise form avec runat=server.] System.Web.UI.Page.VerifyRenderingInServerForm(Control control) +8689747 System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.AddAttributesToRender(HtmlTextWriter writer) +39 System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl.RenderBeginTag(HtmlTextWriter writer) +20 System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +20 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl.RenderContents(HtmlTextWriter writer) +10 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataListItem.RenderItemInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, Boolean extractRows, Boolean tableLayout) +51 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataListItem.RenderItem(HtmlTextWriter writer, Boolean extractRows, Boolean tableLayout) +57 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.System.Web.UI.WebControls.IRepeatInfoUser.RenderItem(ListItemType itemType, Int32 repeatIndex, RepeatInfo repeatInfo, HtmlTextWriter writer) +64 System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeatInfo.RenderVerticalRepeater(HtmlTextWriter writer, IRepeatInfoUser user, Style controlStyle, WebControl baseControl) +262 System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeatInfo.RenderRepeater(HtmlTextWriter writer, IRepeatInfoUser user, Style controlStyle, WebControl baseControl) +27 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.RenderContents(HtmlTextWriter writer) +208 System.Web.UI.WebControls.BaseDataList.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +30 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlContainerControl.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +32 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.Page.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +29 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1266

    Read the article

  • What is the safe way to use fork with Apache::DBI under mod_perl2?

    - by codeholic
    I have a problem when I use Apache::DBI in child processes. The problem is that Apache::DBI provides a single handle for all processes which use it, so I get DBD::mysql::db selectall_arrayref failed: Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now at /usr/local/www/apache22/data/test-fork.cgi line 20. Reconnection doesn't help, since Apache::DBI reconnects in all processes, as I understood the following error The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Error message: DBD driver has not implemented the AutoCommit attribute at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Apache/DBI.pm line 283. , Here's the origin code: use Data::Dumper 'Dumper'; use DBI (); my $dbh = DBI->connect($dsn, $username, $password, { RaiseError => 1, PrintError => 0, }); my $file = "/tmp/test-fork.tmp"; my $pid = fork; defined $pid or die "fork: $!"; if ($pid) { my $rows = eval { $dbh->selectall_arrayref('SELECT SLEEP(1)') }; print "Content-Type: text/plain\n\n"; print $rows ? "parent: " . Dumper($rows) : $@; } else { my $rows = eval { $dbh->selectall_arrayref('SELECT SLEEP(1)') }; open FH, '>', $file or die "$file: $!"; print FH $rows ? "child: " . Dumper($rows) : $@; close FH; } The code I used for reconnection: ... else { $dbh->disconnect; $dbh = DBI->connect($dsn, $username, $password, $attrs); my $rows = eval { $dbh->selectall_arrayref('SELECT SLEEP(1)') }; open FH, '>', $file or die "$file: $!"; print FH $rows ? "child: " . Dumper($rows) : $@; close FH; } Is there a safe way to use Apache::DBI with forking? Is there a way to make it create a new connection perhaps?

    Read the article

  • how to display image in repeater after AJAX AsyncFileUpload ?

    - by Gordon Shamway
    Hello i am using the AsyncFileUpload from the ajaxtoolkit, upter the upload is complete , i want to display all the images that were uploaded (and their URL is inserted into the DB) with my repeater and binding method. but its not working! the images are uploaded, the DB insert works file, but i cant see the images after the repeater is dinded. (i have to mention that if i go step by step, i do see that the ITEMBOUND is being binded and executed) <ajax:TabContainer runat="server" ID="testTab"> <ajax:TabPanel runat="server" ID="testTabContainer"> <ContentTemplate> <ajax:AsyncFileUpload ID="uploadAsyncImage" runat="server" OnUploadedComplete="InsertToTemp" ThrobberID="Throbber"/> <asp:Label ID="Throbber" runat="server" Style="display: none"> <img src="Images/indicator.gif" align="absmiddle" alt="loading" /> </asp:Label> <br /> <asp:UpdatePanel runat="server" ID="pnlImages" UpdateMode="Conditional" ChildrenAsTriggers="true"> <ContentTemplate> <asp:Repeater runat="server" ID="rptImages" > <ItemTemplate> <a href="<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "PicURL")%>" rel="lightbox"> <asp:Image ImageUrl='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "PicURL")%>' Width="50" Height="50" runat="server" ID="testPic" /> </a> </ItemTemplate> </asp:Repeater> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel> </ContentTemplate> </ajax:TabPanel> </ajax:TabContainer> </form> also adding my Code Behind, since it might be important or will help you get an idea of what i am trying to do.private void BindRepater() { ProjDataContext db = DbContext.DbContextProvider(); var pic = from p in db.TempProdCats where p.SessionID == Session.SessionID.ToString() select new { PicURL = p.PicURL }; rptImages.DataSource = pic; rptImages.DataBind(); pnlImages.Update(); } protected void rptImages_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e) { if (e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.Item || e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.AlternatingItem) { Image lblCat = (Image)e.Item.FindControl("testPic"); lblCat.ImageUrl = (string)DataBinder.Eval(e.Item.DataItem, "PicURL"); pnlImages.Update(); } } your help will be highly appreciated , if any of you got any idea how to make it work...

    Read the article

  • how to strip namespaces with e4x?

    - by SorcyCat
    I have an arbitrary XML document provided by a URL. I also have an xpath-like expressions. var xml = <doc><node1><node2><node3>some value</node3></node2></node1></doc>; var path = "node1.node2.node3"; I need to verify if the above path into the XML is valid. I tried to do this using eval and E4X. var value = eval("xml."+path); However, my actual xml document has namespaces which are getting in the way. I do not know the namespaces ahead of time or care what they are. Is there a way to strip all the namespaces out ahead of time? Is there a better way to do this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Reference methods defined in one JScript file from another JScript

    - by Thomas Svensen
    I am writing some server-side scripts using jscript and WSH. The scripts are getting quite long, and some common functions and variables would fit better in a general library script which I included in my various script instances. But, I cannot find a way reference one JScript file from another. For a moment, I though reading the file contents and passing it to "eval()" could work. But, as it says on MSDN: "Note that new variables or types defined in the eval statement are not visible to the enclosing program." (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b51a45x6.aspx) Is there any way to include/refence a JScript from another one?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Dynamic Radiobutton - How to add validation

    - by Velnias
    At the moment I have something like this ` <%# Eval("orderBy").ToString()%) <%# Eval("question").ToString()% " type="radio" id="True" value="True" class="styled" / " type="radio" id="False" value="False" class="styled" / ` And in the code behind I caputure the values as Request.Form("question1") for example and this all works fine Now I am wondering how to add validation to this, I think i have to change to asp Radio Button control but i cant see how i could add my dynamic radiobutton names in there with my id from stored procedure. Also I would like to add the validation to the top of the screen as a validation summary Any Ideas ?

    Read the article

  • Cannot use 'javascript' because another language has been specified earlier in this page (or was implied from a CodeFile attribute).

    - by klm9971
    Hello: I have a website in which I am including a javascript file from this link: Code Snippet Page I am getting this error: Microsoft JScript runtime error: Object expected Here is my code: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Site.Master" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="Default.aspx.cs" Inherits="ATP_Assignment.Default" %> <asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="HeadContent" runat="server"> </asp:Content> <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="topArea" runat="server"> <div> <div id="matchUp" class="floatLeft"> <div class="tabTop"> <div class="tabTL"></div> <div class="tabTM"> <font class="title">Player Matchup History</font> </div> <div class="tabTR"></div> </div> <div class="tabMiddle"> <asp:DropDownList ID="ddlPlayer1" runat="server" Height="16px" Width="146px" DataTextField="Name" DataValueField="Id"> </asp:DropDownList> &nbsp;&nbsp;VS&nbsp;&nbsp; <asp:DropDownList ID="ddlPlayer2" runat="server" Height="16px" Width="150px" DataTextField="Name" DataValueField="ID"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Click" onclick="Button1_Click" /> <br /> Player1: <asp:Label ID="lblPlayer1Score" Value="" runat="server"></asp:Label>&nbsp;&nbsp; Player2: <asp:Label ID="lblPlayer2Score" Value="" runat="server"></asp:Label> </div> <div class="tabBottom"> <div class="tabBL"></div> <div class="tabBM"></div> <div class="tabBR"></div> </div> </div> <div id="favList" class="floatLeft"> <div class="tabTop2"> <div class="tabTL"></div> <div class="tabTM2"> <font class="title">Favorite Player List</font> </div> <div class="tabTR"></div> </div> <div class="tabMiddle2"> Enter Fav JQuery Here!!! </div> <div class="tabBottom2"> <div class="tabBL"></div> <div class="tabBM2"></div> <div class="tabBR"></div> </div> </div> <div class="clearFix">&nbsp;</div> </div> </asp:Content> <asp:Content ID="Content3" ContentPlaceHolderID="contentArea" runat="server"> <div class="padding"> <div> <div id="playerList" class="floatLeft"> <font class="title">Player List</font> <br /> <asp:DataList ID="PlayerList" runat="server"> <ItemTemplate> Name: <asp:Label ID="lblFirstName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("FirstName") %>' /> &nbsp; <asp:Label ID="lblLastName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("LastName") %>' /> <br /> Rank: <asp:Label ID="lblRank" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("Rank") %>' /> <br /> Country: <asp:Label ID="lblCountry" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("Country") %>' /> <br /> <br /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:DataList> </div> <div class="smallPadding">&nbsp;</div> <div id="video"> </div> <div class="clearFix">&nbsp;</div> </div> <div id="tweet"> <font class="title">Recent Tweets</font> <br /> <script type="text/javascript"> alert($ && $.fn ? $.fn.jquery : "jQuery not defined") $(function () { $("#favorites").tweet({ avatar_size: 32, count: 3, username: "atpworldtour", favorites: true, loading_text: "loading list..." }); }); </script> </div> </div> </asp:Content> Where should I put this code: <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.9/jquery-ui.min.js"></script>

    Read the article

  • syntax in sqldatasource selectcommand

    - by netNewbi3
    Hi, My SqlDataSource selectcommand is dynamically changed by the String.Format functionality of the Eval one-way databinding syntax. It works ok. However I need to put together two columns values with a space in the middle (ItemType + '" "' + ItemDescription As ItemInfo) but I can't get the syntax correct as I get the message: "The server tag is not well formed" Can you help? Many thanks <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:conn %>" SelectCommand='<%# Eval("TypeID", "SELECT ItemID, ItemType, ItemType + '" "' + ItemDescription As ItemInfo WHERE ItemType = {0}")%>'> </asp:SqlDataSource>

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Binding integer to CheckBox's Checked field

    - by Sung Meister
    I have a following ListView item template, in which I am trying to bind integer value to Checked property of CheckBox. IsUploaded value contains only 0 and 1... <asp:ListView ID="trustListView" runat="server"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:CheckBox ID="isUploadedCheckBox" runat="server" Checked='<%# Bind("IsUploaded") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:ListView> But ASP.NET complains that Exception Details: System.InvalidCastException: Sepcified cast is not valid Even though following code using DataBinder.Eval() works, I need to have a 2-way binding, thus need to use Bind(). <asp:CheckBox ID="isUploadedCheckBox2" runat="server" Checked='<%# Convert.ToBoolean( DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "IsUploaded"))) %>' /> How can I convert 0's and 1's to boolean using Bind()? [ANSWER] I have extended auto-generated type through partial class by adding a new property mentioned in the answer by Justin

    Read the article

  • Two-way databinding of a custom templated asp.net control

    - by Jason
    I hate long code snippets and I'm sorry about this one, but it turns out that this asp.net stuff can't get much shorter and it's so specific that I haven't been able to generalize it without a full code listing. I just want simple two-way, declarative, edit-only databinding to a single instance of an object. Not a list of objects of a type with a bunch of NotImplementedExceptions for Add, Delete, and Select, but just a single view-state persisted object. This is certainly something that can be done but I've struggled with an implementation for years. This newest, closest implementation was inspired by this article from 4-Guys-From-Rolla. Unfortunately, after implementing, I'm getting the following error and I don't know what I'm missing: System.InvalidOperationException: Databinding methods such as Eval(), XPath(), and Bind() can only be used in the context of a databound control. If I don't use Bind(), and only use Eval() functionality, it works. In that way, the error is especially confusing. Update: Actually, using Eval() does NOT work, but using <%# Container.SampleString %> works. However, Eval("SampleString") gives the same error. That leads me back to this article I found earlier but had discarded. Now I believe it might be related, though I haven't cracked it yet ... Here's the simplified codeset that still produces the error: using System.ComponentModel; namespace System.Web.UI.WebControls.Special { public class SampleFormData { public string SampleString = "Sample String Data"; public int SampleInt = -1; } [ToolboxItem(false)] public class SampleSpecificFormDataContainer : DataBoundControl, INamingContainer { SampleSpecificEntryForm entryForm; internal SampleSpecificEntryForm EntryForm { get { return entryForm; } } [Bindable(true), Category("Data")] public string SampleString { get { return entryForm.FormData.SampleString; } set { entryForm.FormData.SampleString = value; } } [Bindable(true), Category("Data")] public int SampleInt { get { return entryForm.FormData.SampleInt; } set { entryForm.FormData.SampleInt = value; } } internal SampleSpecificFormDataContainer(SampleSpecificEntryForm entryForm) { this.entryForm = entryForm; } } public class SampleSpecificEntryForm : WebControl, INamingContainer { #region Template private IBindableTemplate formTemplate = null; [Browsable(false), DefaultValue(null), TemplateContainer(typeof(SampleSpecificFormDataContainer), ComponentModel.BindingDirection.TwoWay), PersistenceMode(PersistenceMode.InnerProperty)] public virtual IBindableTemplate FormTemplate { get { return formTemplate; } set { formTemplate = value; } } #endregion #region Viewstate SampleFormData FormDataVS { get { return (ViewState["FormData"] as SampleFormData) ?? new SampleFormData(); } set { ViewState["FormData"] = value; SaveViewState(); } } #endregion public override ControlCollection Controls { get { EnsureChildControls(); return base.Controls; } } private SampleSpecificFormDataContainer formDataContainer = null; [Browsable(false), DesignerSerializationVisibility(DesignerSerializationVisibility.Hidden)] public SampleSpecificFormDataContainer FormDataContainer { get { EnsureChildControls(); return formDataContainer; } } [Bindable(true), Browsable(false)] public SampleFormData FormData { get { return FormDataVS; } set { FormDataVS = value; } } protected override void CreateChildControls() { if (!this.ChildControlsCreated) { Controls.Clear(); formDataContainer = new SampleSpecificFormDataContainer(this); Controls.Add(formDataContainer); FormTemplate.InstantiateIn(formDataContainer); this.ChildControlsCreated = true; } } public override void DataBind() { CreateChildControls(); base.DataBind(); } } } With an ASP.NET page the following: <%@ Page Title="Home Page" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Site.master" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="Default2.aspx.cs" Inherits="EntryFormTest._Default2" EnableEventValidation="false" %> <%@ Register Assembly="EntryForm" Namespace="System.Web.UI.WebControls.Special" TagPrefix="cc1" %> <asp:Content ID="HeaderContent" runat="server" ContentPlaceHolderID="HeadContent"> </asp:Content> <asp:Content ID="BodyContent" runat="server" ContentPlaceHolderID="MainContent"> <h2> Welcome to ASP.NET! </h2> <cc1:SampleSpecificEntryForm ID="EntryForm1" runat="server"> <FormTemplate> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("SampleString") %>'></asp:TextBox><br /> <h3>(<%# Container.SampleString %>)</h3><br /> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Button" /> </FormTemplate> </cc1:SampleSpecificEntryForm> </asp:Content> Default2.aspx.cs using System; namespace EntryFormTest { public partial class _Default2 : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { EntryForm1.DataBind(); } } } Thanks for any help!

    Read the article

  • Need an end of lexical scope action which can die normally

    - by Schwern
    I need the ability to add actions to the end of a lexical block where the action might die. And I need the exception to be thrown normally and be able to be caught normally. Unfortunately, Perl special cases exceptions during DESTROY both by adding "(in cleanup)" to the message and making them untrappable. For example: { package Guard; use strict; use warnings; sub new { my $class = shift; my $code = shift; return bless $code, $class; } sub DESTROY { my $self = shift; $self->(); } } use Test::More tests => 2; my $guard_triggered = 0; ok !eval { my $guard = Guard->new( #line 24 sub { $guard_triggered++; die "En guarde!" } ); 1; }, "the guard died"; is $@, "En guarde! at $@ line 24\n", "with the right error message"; is $guard_triggered, 1, "the guard worked"; I want that to pass. Currently the exception is totally swallowed by the eval. This is for Test::Builder2, so I cannot use anything but pure Perl. The underlying issue is I have code like this: { $self->setup; $user_code->(); $self->cleanup; } That cleanup must happen even if the $user_code dies, else $self gets into a weird state. So I did this: { $self->setup; my $guard = Guard->new(sub { $self->cleanup }); $user_code->(); } The complexity comes because the cleanup runs arbitrary user code and it is a use case where that code will die. I expect that exception to be trappable and unaltered by the guard. I'm avoiding wrapping everything in eval blocks because of the way that alters the stack.

    Read the article

  • Call function from GridView source html

    - by Steven
    Here's my GridView HTML: <asp:GridView ID="gvPortfolioImages" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False" DataSourceID="ldsPortfolioImages"> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Image" SortExpression="Filename"> <ItemTemplate> <img src='<%# Portfolio.GetImageURL(Eval("Thumbnail").ToString()) %>' alt='<%# Eval("Thumbnail") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> </asp:GridView> I'm get the following error where I'm trying to call Portfolio.GetImageURL(): The name 'Portfolio' does not exist in the current context I've seen functions called like this before, but it doesn't seem to be working for me. Can anyone tell me what the problem is?

    Read the article

  • Emacs: ac-slime for auto complete

    - by Boris
    I am trying to add auto complete for *.lisp files. My slime setting is: (add-to-list 'load-path "~/.emacs.d/plugins/slime/") (setq slime-lisp-implementations '((sbcl ("/opt/sbcl/bin/sbcl" "--core" "/opt/sbcl/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core") :coding-system utf-8-unix :env ("SBCL_HOME=/opt/sbcl/lib/sbcl")) (ccl ("/opt/ccl/lx86cl64") :coding-system utf-8-unix))) (require 'slime-autoloads) (slime-setup '(slime-fancy)) And ac-slime setting is: (require 'ac-slime) (add-hook 'slime-mode-hook 'set-up-slime-ac) (add-hook 'slime-repl-mode-hook 'set-up-slime-ac) (eval-after-load "auto-complete" '(add-to-list 'ac-modes 'slime-repl-mode)) Each time I type a word in *.lisp file, auto complete popups some candidates but after a second minibuffer outputs error in process filter: Reply to canceled synchronous eval request tag=slime-result-6-19579 sexp=(swank:simple-completions "de" (quote "COMMON-LISP-USER")) and the popup stuck for a while. After that I can continue my selection. My question is how to remove this error and stuck? Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • UpdatePanel works great in all browsers except IE8

    - by Phil
    I'm using a timer triggered update panel which works perfectly under the latest versions of Firefox, Opera, and Safari. However, in IE, it sometimes works fine (just the panel updates without flicker elsewhere), but often the whole page starts to flicker after a while. I'm using a control to encapsulate this logic and the control is used on all of the pages on my web site. Here's my code. Any suggestions? and Thank you. <%@ Control Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="QuoteControl.ascx.cs" Inherits="occinc.QuoteControl" %> <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server" EnablePartialRendering="True" AjaxFrameworkMode="Enabled"/> <asp:UpdatePanel UpdateMode="Conditional" runat="server" ID="UpdatePanel1" > <ContentTemplate> <div id="content-side2-three-column"> <%--Data Source Controls--%> <asp:ObjectDataSource ID="ObjectDataSourceQuotes" runat="server" SelectMethod="GetAllQuotes" TypeName="Quotes"></asp:ObjectDataSource> <asp:GridView ID="GridViewQuotes" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False" DataSourceID="ObjectDataSourceQuotes" BorderWidth="0" BorderColor="white" OnRowCreated="GridViewAllQuotes_RowCreated"> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField> <ItemTemplate> <h2 id="<%# Eval("id").ToString() %>"> <%# Eval("Author") %> </h2> <q lang="en-us"><%# Eval("Content")%></q> <br /> <hr /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> </asp:GridView> </div> </ContentTemplate> <Triggers><asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="Timer1" EventName="Tick" /></Triggers> </asp:UpdatePanel> <asp:Timer ID="Timer1" runat="server" Interval="5000" /> <div class="clear"> </div>

    Read the article

  • Call function under object from string

    - by sam
    I have a script which creates a drag-and-drop uploader on the page from a div. My DIV will look something like <div class="well uploader" data-type="image" data-callback="product.addimage" data-multi="1"></div> Then I'll have a function something like var product = new function(){ /* Some random stuff */ this.addimage = function(image){ alert('W00T! I HAZ AN IMAGE!'); } /* More random stuff */ } When the upload is complete, I need to call the function in data-callback (In this example, product.addimage). I know with global functions you can just do window[callback]() but I'm not sure the best way to do this with functions under objects. My first thought was to do something like* var obj = window; var parts = callback.split('.'); for(part in parts){ obj = obj[parts[part]]; } obj(); but that seems a bit dirty, is there a better way without using eval because eval is evil? I haven't tested this so I have no idea if it will work

    Read the article

  • javax script how to call a function in JavaScript from Java

    - by Dan Howard
    Hi All, I'm trying to call a function in JavaScript via Java. This works fine when directly reading a script as a string but I'm using CompiledScripts. When I do this with a compiled script it gives me method not found if I also add bindings. Without bindings it works but of course the function fails because it needs the bindings. Any ideas? CompiledScript script = ... get script.... Bindings bindings = script.getEngine().createBindings(); Logger scriptLogger = LogManager.getLogger("TEST_SCRIPT"); bindings.put("log", scriptLogger); //script.eval(bindings); -- this way fails script.eval(); // -- this way works Invocable invocable = (Invocable) script.getEngine(); invocable.invokeFunction(methodName); TIA

    Read the article

  • Can parser combination be made efficient?

    - by Jon Harrop
    Around 6 years ago, I benchmarked my own parser combinators in OCaml and found that they were ~5× slower than the parser generators on offer at the time. I recently revisited this subject and benchmarked Haskell's Parsec vs a simple hand-rolled precedence climbing parser written in F# and was surprised to find the F# to be 25× faster than the Haskell. Here's the Haskell code I used to read a large mathematical expression from file, parse and evaluate it: import Control.Applicative import Text.Parsec hiding ((<|>)) expr = chainl1 term ((+) <$ char '+' <|> (-) <$ char '-') term = chainl1 fact ((*) <$ char '*' <|> div <$ char '/') fact = read <$> many1 digit <|> char '(' *> expr <* char ')' eval :: String -> Int eval = either (error . show) id . parse expr "" . filter (/= ' ') main :: IO () main = do file <- readFile "expr" putStr $ show $ eval file putStr "\n" and here's my self-contained precedence climbing parser in F#: let rec (|Expr|) (P(f, xs)) = Expr(loop (' ', f, xs)) and shift oop f op (P(g, xs)) = let h, xs = loop (op, g, xs) loop (oop, f h, xs) and loop = function | ' ' as oop, f, ('+' | '-' as op)::P(g, xs) | (' ' | '+' | '-' as oop), f, ('*' | '/' as op)::P(g, xs) | oop, f, ('^' as op)::P(g, xs) -> let h, xs = loop (op, g, xs) let op = match op with | '+' -> (+) | '-' -> (-) | '*' -> (*) | '/' -> (/) | '^' -> pown loop (oop, op f h, xs) | _, f, xs -> f, xs and (|P|) = function | '-'::P(f, xs) -> let f, xs = loop ('~', f, xs) P(-f, xs) | '('::Expr(f, ')'::xs) -> P(f, xs) | c::xs when '0' <= c && c <= '9' -> P(int(string c), xs) My impression is that even state-of-the-art parser combinators waste a lot of time back tracking. Is that correct? If so, is it possible to write parser combinators that generate state machines to obtain competitive performance or is it necessary to use code generation?

    Read the article

  • How do you do dynamic script evaluation in C#?

    - by Deane
    What is the state of dynamic code evaluation in C#? For a very advanced feature of an app I'm working on, I'd like the users to be able to enter a line of C# code that should evaluate to a boolean. Something like: DateTime.Now.Hours > 12 && DateTime.Now.Hours < 14 I want to dynamically eval this string and capture the result as a boolean. I tried Microsoft.JScript.Eval.JScriptEvaluate, and this worked, but it's technically deprecated and it only works with Javascript (not ideal, but workable). Additionally, I'd like to be able to push objects into the script engine so that they can be used in the evaluation. Some resources I find mentioned dynamically compiling assemblies, but this is more overhead than I think I want to deal with. So, what is the state of dynamic script evaluation in C#? Is it possible, or am I out of luck?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic scoping in Clojure?

    - by j-g-faustus
    Hi, I'm looking for an idiomatic way to get dynamically scoped variables in Clojure (or a similar effect) for use in templates and such. Here is an example problem using a lookup table to translate tag attributes from some non-HTML format to HTML, where the table needs access to a set of variables supplied from elsewhere: (def *attr-table* ; Key: [attr-key tag-name] or [boolean-function] ; Value: [attr-key attr-value] (empty array to ignore) ; Context: Variables "tagname", "akey", "aval" '( ; translate :LINK attribute in <a> to :href [:LINK "a"] [:href aval] ; translate :LINK attribute in <img> to :src [:LINK "img"] [:src aval] ; throw exception if :LINK attribute in any other tag [:LINK] (throw (RuntimeException. (str "No match for " tagname))) ; ... more rules ; ignore string keys, used for internal bookkeeping [(string? akey)] [] )) ; ignore I want to be able to evaluate the rules (left hand side) as well as the result (right hand side), and need some way to put the variables in scope at the location where the table is evaluated. I also want to keep the lookup and evaluation logic independent of any particular table or set of variables. I suppose there are similar issues involved in templates (for example for dynamic HTML), where you don't want to rewrite the template processing logic every time someone puts a new variable in a template. Here is one approach using global variables and bindings. I have included some logic for the table lookup: ;; Generic code, works with any table on the same format. (defn rule-match? [rule-val test-val] "true if a single rule matches a single argument value" (cond (not (coll? rule-val)) (= rule-val test-val) ; plain value (list? rule-val) (eval rule-val) ; function call :else false )) (defn rule-lookup [test-val rule-table] "looks up rule match for test-val. Returns result or nil." (loop [rules (partition 2 rule-table)] (when-not (empty? rules) (let [[select result] (first rules)] (if (every? #(boolean %) (map rule-match? select test-val)) (eval result) ; evaluate and return result (recur (rest rules)) ))))) ;; Code specific to *attr-table* (def tagname) ; need these globals for the binding in html-attr (def akey) (def aval) (defn html-attr [tagname h-attr] "converts to html attributes" (apply hash-map (flatten (map (fn [[k v :as kv]] (binding [tagname tagname akey k aval v] (or (rule-lookup [k tagname] *attr-table*) kv))) h-attr )))) (defn test-attr [] "test conversion" (prn "a" (html-attr "a" {:LINK "www.google.com" "internal" 42 :title "A link" })) (prn "img" (html-attr "img" {:LINK "logo.png" }))) user=> (test-attr) "a" {:href "www.google.com", :title "A link"} "img" {:src "logo.png"} This is nice in that the lookup logic is independent of the table, so it can be reused with other tables and different variables. (Plus of course that the general table approach is about a quarter of the size of the code I had when I did the translations "by hand" in a giant cond.) It is not so nice in that I need to declare every variable as a global for the binding to work. Here is another approach using a "semi-macro", a function with a syntax-quoted return value, that doesn't need globals: (defn attr-table [tagname akey aval] `( [:LINK "a"] [:href ~aval] [:LINK "img"] [:src ~aval] [:LINK] (throw (RuntimeException. (str "No match for " tagname))) ; ... more rules [(string? ~akey)] [] ))) Only a couple of changes are needed to the rest of the code: In rule-match?, when syntax-quoted the function call is no longer a list: - (list? rule-val) (eval rule-val) + (seq? rule-val) (eval rule-val) In html-attr: - (binding [tagname tagname akey k aval v] - (or (rule-lookup [k tagname] *attr-table*) kv))) + (or (rule-lookup [k tagname] (attr-table tagname k v)) kv))) And we get the same result without globals. (And without dynamic scoping.) Are there other alternatives to pass along sets of variable bindings declared elsewhere, without the globals required by Clojure's binding? Is there an idiomatic way of doing it, like Ruby's binding or Javascript's function.apply(context)?

    Read the article

  • Best practice. Do I save html tags in DB or store the html entity value?

    - by Matt
    Hi Guys, I was wondering about which way i should do the following. I am using the tiny MCE wysiwyg editor which formats the users data with the right html tags. Now, i need to save this data entered into the editor into a database table. Should I encode the html tags to their corresponding entities when inserting into the DB, then when i get the data back from the table, not have the encode it for XSS purposes but I'd still have to use eval for the html tags to format the text. OR Do i save the html tags into the database, then when i get the data back from the database encode the html tags to their entities, but then as the tags will appear to the user, I'd have to use the eval function to actually format the data as it was entered. My thoughts are with the first option, I just wondered on what you guys thought.

    Read the article

  • Dynamically Casting In ActionScript

    - by Joshua
    Is there a way to cast dynamically in Actionscript? What I want to accomplish is illustrated by the following code: var Val:*; var S:String=SomeTextEdit.text; switch (DesiredTypeTextEdit.text) { case 'int':Val=int(S);break; case 'uint':Val=uint(S);break; case 'String':Val=String(S);break; case 'Number':Val=Number(S);break; ... } SomeDisplayObject[SomePropertyNameTextEdit.text]=Val; I am looking for something LIKE the following PSEUDOCODE: SomeDisplayObject[SomePropertyName]=eval(DesiredType)(SomeTextEdit.text); Yes, I already realize that "eval" is not on the table, nor is that how one would use it. What's the RIGHT way?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >