Search Results

Search found 5714 results on 229 pages for 'held packages'.

Page 15/229 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • /usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory

    - by G_T
    Im trying to locally install a program which is written in C++. I have downloaded the program and am attempting to use the "make" command to compile the program as the programs instructions dictate. However when I do I get this error: /usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Looking around on the internet some people seem to address this problem by sudo apt-get install libc6-dev-i386 I checked to see if this package was installed and it was not. When I try to install it I get E: Unable to locate package libc6-dev-i386 I have already run sudo apt get update Im sure this is a rookie question but any help is appreciated, I'm running 13.10 32-bit.

    Read the article

  • Install usblib package - Ubuntu

    - by Tom celic
    I need the package libusb for another package I am installing. I tried the following which seemed to install the package, sudo apt-get install libusb-dev but when I try to install the other package I get, configure: error: Package requirements (libusb-1.0 >= 0.9.1) were not met: No package 'libusb-1.0' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBUSB_CFLAGS and LIBUSB_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. When I run the command dpkg -L libusb-dev, I get: /. /usr /usr/bin /usr/bin/libusb-config /usr/include /usr/include/usb.h /usr/lib /usr/lib/libusb.a /usr/lib/libusb.la /usr/lib/pkgconfig /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libusb.pc /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/preface.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/intro.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/intro-overview.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/intro-support.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/api.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/api-device-interfaces.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/api-timeouts.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/api-types.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/api-synchronous.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/api-return-values.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/functions.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/ref.core.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbinit.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbfindbusses.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbfinddevices.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbgetbusses.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/ref.deviceops.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbopen.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbclose.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbsetconfiguration.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbsetaltinterface.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbresetep.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbclearhalt.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbreset.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbclaiminterface.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbreleaseinterface.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/ref.control.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbcontrolmsg.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbgetstring.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbgetstringsimple.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbgetdescriptor.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbgetdescriptorbyendpoint.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/ref.bulk.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbbulkwrite.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbbulkread.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/ref.interrupt.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbinterruptwrite.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbinterruptread.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/ref.nonportable.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbgetdrivernp.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/function.usbdetachkerneldrivernp.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/examples.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/examples-code.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/examples-tests.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/html/examples-other.html /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/copyright /usr/share/doc-base /usr/share/doc-base/libusb-dev /usr/share/man /usr/share/man/man1 /usr/share/man/man1/libusb-config.1.gz /usr/lib/libusb.so /usr/share/doc/libusb-dev/changelog.Debian.gz Any ideas??

    Read the article

  • 'Make' command compiling errors

    - by G_T
    Im trying to locally install a program which is written in C++. I have downloaded the program and am attempting to use the "make" command to compile the program as the programs instructions dictate. However when I do I get this error: /usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Looking around on the internet some people seem to address this problem by sudo apt-get install libc6-dev-i386 I checked to see if this package was installed and it was not. When I try to install it I get E: Unable to locate package libc6-dev-i386 I have already run sudo apt get update Im sure this is a rookie question but any help is appreciated, I'm running 13.10 32-bit. UPDATE: I've tried other suggestions I've found on similar error. All I have managed is a different but similar error. Here is what I get. Geoffrey@Geoffrey-Latitude-E6400:/usr/local/src/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14$ make Using gnu compiler for Inchworm and Chrysalis cd Inchworm && (test -e configure || autoreconf) \ && ./configure --prefix=`pwd` && make install checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... mawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for g++... g++ checking for C++ compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 checking for library containing cos... none required configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: config.h is unchanged config.status: executing depfiles commands make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Inchworm' Making install in src make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Inchworm/src' if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -pedantic -fopenmp -Wall -Wextra -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated -m64 -g -O2 -MT Fasta_entry.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/Fasta_entry.Tpo" -c -o Fasta_entry.o Fasta_entry.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/Fasta_entry.Tpo" ".deps/Fasta_entry.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/Fasta_entry.Tpo"; exit 1; fi In file included from Fasta_entry.hpp:4:0, from Fasta_entry.cpp:1: /usr/include/c++/4.8/string:38:28: fatal error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory #include <bits/c++config.h> ^ compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [Fasta_entry.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Inchworm/src' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Inchworm' make: *** [inchworm] Error 2

    Read the article

  • How to add a c file to be compiled with a package

    - by Ahmed
    I want to add a file hstest.c which comes with bluez package but not by default added to the makefile to the sources that are compiled with the buid system. I read about makefiles and autotools but now I am hesitant to make changes to the makefiles. Should I modify the makefile.am and then run automake or just change the makefile.in or the makefile itself ? and how ? config script Makefile.am Makefile Makefile.in

    Read the article

  • "Unable to locate package" errors for all software

    - by Mohammad Hosain Safari
    My apt-get doesn't install any programs. I try to install programs with apt-get install but always it shows same error: unable to locate package. For example I try to install the xbmc media center; here's what happens: $ sudo apt-get install xbmc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package xbmc I have updated my package list with sudo apt-get update.

    Read the article

  • Lubuntu Stability Problems

    - by marinara
    I installed Lubuntu 11.10 from scratch a few days ago, now I can't even run aptitude without crashing from the mess it's made of the package system. (yes I added a non-offical repository, because I needed firefox 8) I'm a new user. So I don't know. Did I make a mistake by loading Lubuntu? I really like the LXDE stuff. but so many things seem very buggy. ***edit I think besides the sound problems, all of my other problems are with either LXDE or with openbox. And I think the sound problem is Lubuntu specific also. Problems like windows not popping up, windows not getting painted. Windows flashing in the panel for no reason, Windows losing their title bar occasionally, mousewheel changing desktops when i'm clearly in a window, LXDE panel not responding to clicks, applications not launching from the menu, applications not launching from firefox downloads window, applications crashing when I don't do anything but click on them. Pretty sure all this stuff is openbox or LXDE. This is just too much work to keep Lubuntu running. It's a lemon. (sorry I realize I should be constructive but I'm tired) It's pretty clear that openbox needs some damn bugfixes for compatibility with Oneric. And LXDE isn't that great either. I expect things to launch when I click on them. I think installing the acpid package is what made it clear to me. If 20 seconds after installing the package (from the offical repo), linux has already crashed, then I'm in the wrong damn neighborhood.

    Read the article

  • Problems with updates

    - by legospace9876
    I can not update Weather Indicator with Update Manager. This is the terminal log: installArchives() failed: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "sr_RS.utf_8_latin" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "sr_RS.utf_8_latin" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "sr_RS.utf_8_latin" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "sr_RS.utf_8_latin" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the andard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Setting up indicator-weather (11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1) ... Installing indicator-specific icons... Installing indicator dconf schema... cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/indicator-weather/indicator-weather.gschema.xml': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing indicator-weather (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: indicator-weather Error in function: SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Setting up indicator-weather (11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1) ... Installing indicator-specific icons... Installing indicator dconf schema... cp: cannot stat `**/usr/share/indicator-weather/indicator-weather.gschema.xml**': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing indicator-weather (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 The file that I bold really does not exist. How can I solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Tracking the popularity of a package over time?

    - by DoR
    Is there any software or website that allows the user to view a graph of how popular a particular package is? The popcon.ubuntu.com site has raw information on how many people (who have installed popularity-contest) have installed a particular package, but it would be interesting to see how a package's popularity changes over time. I remember using a website that graphed this, but I don't know if it still exist.

    Read the article

  • Stuck removing ffmpeg from system due to package problems

    - by Michiel
    I'd be very grateful to get a bit of support on the following situation: Using Ubuntu 12.04, and I used the PPA of Jon Severinson for ffmpeg. I had a problem playing movies with mplayer, so I decided to remove the PPA and try to use libav only after I read this article about libav vs ffmpeg. I first removed the PPA from the list, then apt-get update, etc. But I couldn't remove ffmpeg due to dependency-errors and got stuck in what seemed some kind of loop. Then I found a suggestion here. I followed the steps, and ended up force-removing libavcodec-extra-53. Because, apparently that was "what got stuff moving again". At the moment I can't. Now Ubuntu is reporting a broken package (BrokenCount 0). Errors: De afhankelijkheden van de volgende pakketten konden niet geïnstalleerd worden: audacious-plugins: Depends: audacious-plugins-data (= 3.2.1-4ubuntu1) maar 3.2.1-4ubuntu1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libcurl3-gnutls (= 7.16.2-1) maar 7.22.0-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) maar 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpulse0 (= 1:0.99.1) maar 1:1.1-0ubuntu15.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.6) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libwavpack1 (= 4.40.0) maar 4.60.1-2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libxcomposite1 (= 1:0.3-1) maar 1:0.4.3-2build1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4) maar 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd libavfilter-extra-2: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libswresample-extra-0 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd libavformat-extra-53: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd libk3b6-extracodecs: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libkdecore5 (= 4:4.4.4) maar 4:4.8.4a-0ubuntu0.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libkio5 (= 4:4.4.4) maar 4:4.8.4a-0ubuntu0.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.7.0~beta1) maar 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.1.1) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd libquicktime2: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd libxine1-ffmpeg: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.4) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libxine1-bin (= 1.1.20-2build1) maar 1.1.20-2build1 is geïnstalleerd mencoder: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd mplayer: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd vlc: Depends: vlc-nox (= 2.0.3-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) maar 2.0.3-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.15) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libfreetype6 (= 2.2.1) maar 2.4.8-1ubuntu2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) maar 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.0) maar 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libqtgui4 (= 4:4.7.0~beta1) maar 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.6) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg) maar 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd vlc-nox: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.15) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libfontconfig1 (= 2.8.0) maar 2.8.0-3ubuntu9.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libfreetype6 (= 2.2.1) maar 2.4.8-1ubuntu2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) maar 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgnutls26 (= 2.12.6.1-0) maar 2.12.14-5ubuntu3.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libmpcdec6 (= 1:0.1~r435) maar 2:0.1~r459-1ubuntu1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libncursesw5 (= 5.6+20070908) maar 5.9-4 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libsmbclient (= 3.0.24) maar 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.6) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libudev0 (= 147) maar 175-0ubuntu9.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libxml2 (= 2.7.4) maar 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.2.0.2) maar 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd xbmc-bin: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavfilter-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd And apt-get is reporting: root@LAPTOP:~# apt-get -f install Pakketlijsten worden ingelezen... Klaar Boom van vereisten wordt opgebouwd De status informatie wordt gelezen... Klaar Vereisten worden gecorrigeerd... mislukt. De volgende pakketten hebben niet-voldane vereisten: audacious-plugins : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libavfilter-extra-2 : Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libavformat-extra-53 : Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libk3b6-extracodecs : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libquicktime2 : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libxine1-ffmpeg : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd mencoder : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd mplayer : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd vlc : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd vlc-nox : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd xbmc-bin : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd E: Fout, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve maakte scheidingen aan, dit kan veroorzaakt worden door vastgehouden pakketten. E: Kan vereisten niet corrigeren How to proceed?? Thanks in advance, Michiel

    Read the article

  • Terminal Errors/Package Erros

    - by Bryan
    After running some updates a week ago or so, I've noticed that after any installations via the Ubuntu Software Center or any installed in the GUI have given an error message stating that there was a package error. Also any installations done through the terminal have given the E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) message at the end of each install. Oddly, the software is still installed and seems to function properly. Is there any way to get rid of this? I've tried to run apt-get autoclean as recommended on another site, but this doesn't seem to work. I'm fairly new to Linux/Ubuntu, just FYI.

    Read the article

  • ghc6 install trouble: hGetContents: invalid argument (invalid UTF-8 byte sequence)

    - by olimay
    Having trouble installing ghc6. Here's what seems to be the relevant error that comes up when I try to (apt-get|aptitude) install ghc6: A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up ghc6 (6.12.1-13ubuntu1) ... ghc-pkg: /home/opm/.ghc/i386-linux-6.12.1/package.conf.d/unix-compat-0.2-edefa7bced91ebe610d455bab466e200.conf: hGetContents: invalid argument (invalid UTF-8 byte sequence) (Here's the full output, if you're interested: http://paste.ubuntu.com/566475/ ) This still happens after apt-get clean and apt-get update. My searching around has not really helped me understand what's going on, except that it might be caused by a mismatch in locale. So, here's the output of locale too: LANG=en_US.utf8 LANGUAGE=en_US:en LC_CTYPE="en_US.utf8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.utf8" LC_TIME="en_US.utf8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.utf8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.utf8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.utf8" LC_PAPER="en_US.utf8" LC_NAME="en_US.utf8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.utf8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.utf8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.utf8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.utf8" LC_ALL= Any ideas? Additional background: this all seems very strange to me, because I used to have ghc6 installed correctly--I use XMonad as my main window manager most of the time. I tried to install haskell-platform (through apt), which failed and told me that there was something wrong with ghc6, and so I reinstalled ghc6 and began to get the above error message. (Originally posted here to SuperUser, until I remembered today that this SE site existed.)

    Read the article

  • How do I create a .deb file?

    - by JamesTheAwesomeDude
    Yes, I know that this question has been asked many times before, but none of the answers really helped. I'd like to package the Minecraft launcher (which has no proprietary code, AFAIK,) into a .deb file so that I can put it on a flash drive and share it with my friends. I have managed to install Minecraft it manually (put some files into /opt/minecraft, download an icon, and create a .desktop file in /usr/share/applications,) and I have made a shell script that completely automates the process, but it relies on wget to retrieve a few files, including the .desktop file. (It isn't a self-extracting archive, after all.) I'd like to be able to do this offline, as a lot of my friends have slow or no internet. (One of their internet lines was buried so shallowly that it actually got knocked out by the lawnmower.) I won't be loading it into a PPA or anything like that; I just want it to be a "formal" package that can be easily installed and uninstalled. (One thing that I would like is for sudo apt-get purge minecraft to also remove the .minecraft folder. It would also be nice to define the dependedcies as being able to accept OpenJDK or Sun's JVM.) Oh, just so you know, the Minecraft launcher is a .jar file, but I can very, very easily launch it via shell scripts. The exact command is right on the download page.

    Read the article

  • How do I choose a package format for Linux software distribution?

    - by Ian C.
    We have a Java-based application that, to date, we've been distributing as a tarball with instructions for deploying. It's mostly self-contained so deployment is fairly straight-forward: Untar on the disk you'd like it to live on; Make sure Java is in your path and a suitable distro and version; Verify ownership and group on all the files Start up the server processes with our start script If the user wants to get in to start-on-boot stuff with SysV we have some written instructions and a template init file for it in our tarball. We'd like to make this installation process a little more seamless; take care of the permissions and the init script deployment. We're also going to start bundling our own JRE with the application so that we're mostly free of external dependencies. The question we're faced with now is: how do we pick a package format for distribution? Is RPM the standard? Can all package management tools deal with it now? Our clients primarily run RHEL and CentOS, but we do have some using SuSE and even Debian. If we can pick a distro-agnostic format we'd prefer that. What about a self-extracting shell script? Something akin to how Java is distributed. If we're dependency-free would the self-extracting script be sufficient? What features or conveniences would we lose out on going with the script versus a proper package format meant for use by a package manager?

    Read the article

  • Single python file distribution: module or package?

    - by DanielSank
    Suppose I have a useful python function or class (or whatever) called useful_thing which exists in a single file. There are essentialy two ways to organize the source tree. The first way uses a single module: - setup.py - README.rst - ...etc... - foo.py where useful_thing is defined in foo.py. The second strategy is to make a package: - setup.py - README.rst - ...etc... - foo |-module.py |-__init__.py where useful_thing is defined in module.py. In the package case __init__.py would look like this from foo.module import useful_thing so that in both cases you can do from foo import useful_thing. Question: Which way is preferred, and why? EDIT: Since user gnat says this question is poorly formed, I'll add that the official python packaging tutorial does not seem to comment on which of the methods described above is the preferred one. I am explicitly not giving my personal list of pros and cons because I'm interested in whether there is a community preferred method, not generating a discussion of pros/cons :)

    Read the article

  • always purge on remove in package

    - by Jeroen
    Is there a way I can set my package to always automatically include a --purge whenever a user does a regular apt-get remove mypackage ? The reason is that I have some config files in /etc that should really be removed when the binaries are removed, otherwise it can lead to weird behavior. However I still want to treat them as conf files, i.e. make sure apt does not just wipe them on every upgrade of the package. But they should be removed when the package is uninstalled. Currently I am manually deleting the /etc conf files in my postrm script. However I just found out that this has a unfortunate side effect: if the user uninstalls and then later re-installs the package, the conf files won't be reinstalled, because apt thinks that they are still there. So is there a way I can manually trigger a full 'purge' in my postrm, such that apt knows that the conf files are gone?

    Read the article

  • Creating java package on ubuntu?

    - by Gaurav_Java
    I am new to java. Here I am trying to create java package. And try to compile it from another directory . But there is an error like bash: /home/gaurav/Desktop/package2/B.java: Permission denied Here is fy first code and directory is /home/Desktop/package/A.java package package1; public class A { interface A1 { void show(); void display(); } } class B extends A { public void show() { System.out.println("This is show method()"); } public void display() { System.out.println("this is Display metthod()"); } } For compilation I did this command it's works fine. pwd is /home/gaurav javac /home/gaurav/Desktop/package/A.java When I try to compile B.java which is in my Other drive /media/gaurav/iPlay/package/B.java package package2; class B { public static void main(String args[]) { System.out.println("Reached in Main method of B"); package1.A Object = new A(); } } I tired this vommand (grom previous working directory) javac -cp /home/gaurav/Desktop/;/media/gaurav/iPlay/package/B.java Error Comes javac -cp /home/gaurav/Desktop/;/media/gaurav/iPlay/package/B.java javac: no source files Usage: javac <options> <source files> use -help for a list of possible options bash: /media/gaurav/iPlay/package/B.java: Permission denied What i am doing wrong? Please it my assignment I am not able to move further without this. I changed permissions.

    Read the article

  • Script to only execute during first install of a package

    - by Jeroen
    I recently started packaging up some of my software and publishing it on Launchpad. The installation and removal works fine, but upgrading the package form one version to the next version is problematic. The problem is that there are some scripts that only need to run during the first installation of the package. These scripts populate the DB, create a user, etc. They are currently called in the package.postinst configure) section. However this results in them being called during an upgrade as well as shown in the diagram. Is there a way to include a maintainer script in a .deb package that only executes during the first installation of the package and not during an upgrade? Or what would be an elegant way to include some initial setup scripts in a .deb package?

    Read the article

  • Problem installing UniversalIndentGUI

    - by DNikolov
    I need a GUI beautifier for C code. I've found UniversalIndentGUI on sourceforge. Downloaded a .deb file.Opened it with Ubuntu Software Center to install it but the button is grey and unclickable and there is a line saying Dependency is not satisfiable: libqscintilla2-3. I've installed via the Synaptic Package Manager libqscintilla2-5 but that didn't help. Is there any way to install the UniversalIndentGUI, the libqscintilla2-3 package or to some how work around the problem?

    Read the article

  • What are the risks of installing a "bad quality" package?

    - by ændrük
    When I try to install sonic-visualiser_1.9cc-1_amd64.deb via the Software Center the following warning message is displayed: The package is of bad quality The installation of a package which violates the quality standards isn't allowed. This could cause serious problems on your computer. Please contact the person or organisation who provided this package file and include the details beneath. Lintian check results for /home/ak/Downloads/sonic-visualiser_1.9cc-1_amd64.deb: Use of uninitialized value $ENV{"HOME"} in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/lintian line 108. E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/bin/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/bin/sonic-visualiser 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/applications/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/applications/sonic-visualiser.desktop 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/CHANGELOG 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/COPYING 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/README 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/application/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/application/x-sonicvisualiser-layer.desktop 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/application/x-sonicvisualiser.desktop 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/pixmaps/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/pixmaps/sv-icon-light.svg 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/pixmaps/sv-icon.svg 1000/1000 I understand that this means the package doesn't meet Debian policy and I know how to override the warning and install the package anyway. What are the risks of doing so?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu Upgrade breaks firefox

    - by Dennis
    I upgraded ubuntu, but the upgrade broke firefox, adobe flash plugin and corrupted the package database. I ran the suggested catalog repair, no change. I ran apt-get -f install, no change. I ran apt purge packageName, no change. How can I resolve this circular dependency? Here are some details: installArchives() failed: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of adobe-flashplugin: firefox (12.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) breaks adobe-flashplugin (<= 11.1.102.63-0precise1) and is installed. Version of adobe-flashplugin to be configured is 10.0.32.18-1intrepid1. dpkg: error processing adobe-flashplugin (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of adobe-flash-properties-gtk: adobe-flash-properties-gtk depends on adobe-flashplugin (= 11.2.202.235-0precise1); however: Version of adobe-flashplugin on system is 10.0.32.18-1intrepid1. dpkg: error processing adobe-flash-properties-gtk (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: adobe-flashplugin adobe-flash-properties-gtk Error in function: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of adobe-flash-properties-gtk: adobe-flash-properties-gtk depends on adobe-flashplugin (= 11.2.202.235-0precise1); however: Version of adobe-flashplugin on system is 10.0.32.18-1intrepid1. dpkg: error processing adobe-flash-properties-gtk (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

    Read the article

  • Items cannot be installed or removed

    - by Gyanendra Kumar Gyan
    installArchives() failed: (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5% (Reading database ... 10% (Reading database ... 15% (Reading database ... 20% (Reading database ... 25% (Reading database ... 30% (Reading database ... 35% (Reading database ... 40% (Reading database ... 45% (Reading database ... 50% (Reading database ... 55% (Reading database ... 60% (Reading database ... 65% (Reading database ... 70% (Reading database ... 75% (Reading database ... 80% (Reading database ... 85% (Reading database ... 90% (Reading database ... 95% (Reading database ... 100% (Reading database ... 136187 files and directories currently installed.) Removing pidgin-ppa ... gpg: key "67265EB522BDD6B1C69E66ED7FB8BEE0A1F196A8" not found: eof gpg: 67265EB522BDD6B1C69E66ED7FB8BEE0A1F196A8: delete key failed: eof dpkg: error processing pidgin-ppa (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Processing triggers for ureadahead ... ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot Errors were encountered while processing: pidgin-ppa Error in function: SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    Read the article

  • Item cannot be installed or removed until the package catalogue is repaired

    - by Alex Thorne
    After installing Microsoft Windows Compatibility Layer (meta-package) i receive an error Item cannot be installed or removed until the package catalogue is repaired. Do you want to repair it Ok, I thought... I'll just click repair and be done with it. After doing so I receive another error. The full text reads: installArchives() failed: (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5% (Reading database ... 10% (Reading database ... 15% (Reading database ... 20% (Reading database ... 25% (Reading database ... 30% (Reading database ... 35% (Reading database ... 40% (Reading database ... 45% (Reading database ... 50% (Reading database ... 55% (Reading database ... 60% (Reading database ... 65% (Reading database ... 70% (Reading database ... 75% (Reading database ... 80% (Reading database ... 85% (Reading database ... 90% (Reading database ... 95% (Reading database ... 100% (Reading database ... 212945 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libasound2:i386 (from .../libasound2_1.0.25-1ubuntu10_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libasound2_1.0.25-1ubuntu10_i386.deb (--unpack): './usr/share/alsa/cards/ICE1712.conf' is different from the same file on the system dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libasound2_1.0.25-1ubuntu10_i386.deb Error in function: SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wine1.4-i386:i386: wine1.4-i386:i386 depends on libasound2 (>= 1.0.23); however: Package libasound2:i386 is not installed. dpkg: error processing wine1.4-i386:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wine1.4: wine1.4 depends on wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4-0ubuntu4); however: Package wine1.4-i386 is not installed. Package wine1.4-i386:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing wine1.4 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wine: wine depends on wine1.4; however: Package wine1.4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing wine (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wine1.4-common: wine1.4-common depends on wine1.4 (= 1.4-0ubuntu4); however: Package wine1.4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing wine1.4-common (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wine1.4-amd64: wine1.4-amd64 depends on wine1.4-common (= 1.4-0ubuntu4); however: Package wine1.4-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing wine1.4-amd64 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured So I click OK and now I'm back to previous screen ("Item cannot be installed ...") I click on cancel and go to the red circle on the top right on my screen and try to update from there and receive this error After that I just get thrown these errors So now I can't add or remove any programs on my system. Does anyone have any idea how to fix this?

    Read the article

  • how to install gfortran package on ubuntu 12.04 offline pc

    - by veerendar
    I have downloaded gfortran package from there site and now looking for installing it on the offline ubuntu 12.04 pc... please don't close this question stating possible duplicate. I am looking for steps to install the package by extracting and installing it. I don't want to use get-offline neither keryx nor to use some other online ubuntu systems. I am very much clear.. I have the downloaded package and I am looking forward for the steps to install the package with out accessing internet. Thanks!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >