Search Results

Search found 37012 results on 1481 pages for 'sql query'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 151/1481 | < Previous Page | 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158  | Next Page >

  • SQL Server 2005: When copy table structure to other database "CONSTRAINT" keywords lost

    - by StreamT
    Snippet of original table: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Batch]( [CustomerDepositMade] [money] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_Batch_CustomerDepositMade] DEFAULT (0) Snippet of copied table: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Batch]( [CustomerDepositMade] [money] NOT NULL, Code for copy database: Server server = new Server(SourceSQLServer); Database database = server.Databases[SourceDatabase]; Transfer transfer = new Transfer(database); transfer.CopyAllObjects = true; transfer.CopySchema = true; transfer.CopyData = false; transfer.DropDestinationObjectsFirst = true; transfer.DestinationServer = DestinationSQLServer; transfer.CreateTargetDatabase = true; Database ddatabase = new Database(server, DestinationDatabase); ddatabase.Create(); transfer.DestinationDatabase = DestinationDatabase; transfer.Options.IncludeIfNotExists = true; transfer.TransferData();

    Read the article

  • UNIQUE Constraints in SQL (SQL Server)

    - by rockbala
    Why are UNIQUE Constraints needed in database ? Can you provide any examples ? Primary Key is UNIQUE by default... Understandable as they are referred in other tables as Foreign keys... relation is needed to connect them for rdbms platform... but why would one refer to other columns as UNIQUE, what is benefit of doing so ?)

    Read the article

  • Remove and Replace multiple chars ( spaces, hyphen, brackets, period) from string in sql

    - by Muhammad Kashif Nadeem
    +39 235 6595750 19874624611 +44 (0)181 446 5697 +431 6078115-2730 +1 617 358 5128 +48.40.23755432 +44 1691 872 410 07825 893217 0138 988 1649 (415) 706 2001 00 44 (0) 20 7660 4650 (765) 959-1504 07731 508 486 please reply by email dont have one +447769146971 Please see the above given phone numbers. I need to replace all spaces, hyphen, period, brackets and leading 0 etc from these numbers. I need this format +447469186974 If number has leading plus sign then don't replace it otherwise I have to concatenate + sign with it. E.G +39 235 6595750 in this number I just need to remove spaces. +44 (0)181 446 5697 in this i need to removes spaces and brackets and 0 in between brackets i.e (0) 07825 893217 in this I need to replace leading 0 with + sign and remove spaces (415) 706 2001 in this replace '(' with + sign and remove ')' and spaces. 'please reply by email' This is the entry in phone number field and I just need to ignore this. +48.40.23755432 Remove period in phone number (765) 959-1504 Remove brackets and spaces and hyphen and add + sign in front of number. 7798724250 just need to add + sign in front of number 00 44 (0) 20 7660-4650 Need to remove leading 0 I.E '00' remove spaces and brackets and 0 in between brackets and hyphen and add + sign in front of number Only leading '0' will be replaced not anyother occourence of '0' The desired result is +447769146971 Should I use nested REPLACE, CHARINDES, PATINDES for each char I want to replace? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server - Error when trying to reference a .mdf file

    - by Amokrane
    Hi, For a NUnit test I need to reference a .mdf file from a .config file. Unfortunately, I get the following error message: The FOR ATTACH option requires that at least the primary file be specified. An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file C:\....\*.mdf A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share. I looked for this error on google but didn't find anything that helped me solve my problem. Any idea? Thank you

    Read the article

  • error come to execute the stored procedure using with open xml in sql server

    - by Muthumari
    Hi, i execute the below stored procedure.but it shows the error. The error is 'Incorrect syntax near '.'.i.e error shows in 'xmlFields.Country' please look this stored procedure also and help me thanks, in advance create procedure sp_SuUpdateSUADUsersStatus ( @FinalEMPCode nvarchar(50), @xmlFields NTEXT ) AS DECLARE @CityIDReturn INT SET NOCOUNT ON BEGIN DECLARE @hdoc INT EXEC sp_xml_preparedocument @hdoc OUTPUT, @xmlFields BEGIN EXEC @CityIDReturn=sp_SuSaveADUsersLocation @Country=xmlFields.Country, xmlFields.State,xmlFields.City FROM OPENXML(@hDoc, 'EmpCode/User', 2) WITH (Country nvarchar(500),State nvarchar(500),City nvarchar(500)) as xmlFields where xmlFields.Country <>'' and xmlFields.State <>'' and xmlFields.City <>'') END EXEC sp_xml_removedocument @hdoc End

    Read the article

  • Convert row to column using sql server 2008?

    - by jaykanth
    Table name is Looupvalue id Ptypefield Value 1 1 D 2 1 E 3 1 F 4 1 G 5 1 H 6 2 FL 7 2 IF 8 2 VVS1 9 2 VVS2 10 2 VS1 11 2 VS2 12 3 0.50 13 3 1.00 14 3 1.50 15 3 2.00 16 4 Marquise 17 4 Round 18 4 Pear 19 4 Radiant 20 4 Princess Lookupvalue table value convert roow to column depends on ptypefield Like id 1 id 2 id 3 id 4 1 D 6 fl 12 0.50 16 Marquise 2 E 7 If 13 1 17 Round.... 3 F 8 vvs2 14 1.5 4 G 9 vvs2 15 2 5 H 10 vs1 11 vs2 Thanks

    Read the article

  • Select column value that matches a combination of other columns values on the same table

    - by Ala
    I have a table called Ads and another Table called AdDetails to store the details of each Ad in a Property / Value style, Here is a simplified example with dummy code: [AdDetailID], [AdID], [PropertyName], [PropertyValue] 2 28 Color Red 3 28 Speed 100 4 27 Color Red 5 28 Fuel Petrol 6 27 Speed 70 How to select Ads that matches many combinations of PropertyName and PropertyValue, for example : where PropertyName='Color' and PropertyValue='Red' And where PropertyName='Speed' and CAST(PropertyValue AS INT) > 60

    Read the article

  • Picking Random Names

    - by Jasl
    I saw an interesting post sometime back but with no solution. Trying luck here: There is a table which contain 10 names (U1, U2, U3..and so on). I have to choose 5 names everyday, and display one as the Editor and 4 as Contributors While selecting the random names, I have to also consider that if one user is selected as Editor, he cannot become editor again till everyone got their chance. The output should look similar to the following: Editor Cont1 Cont2 Cont3 Cont4 20-Jun U1 U8 U9 U3 U4 21-Jun U7 U2 U5 U6 U10 22-Jun U3 U4 U9 U2 U8 23-Jun U4 U8 U3 U5 U2 and so on..

    Read the article

  • Specifying schema for temporary tables

    - by Tom Hunter
    I'm used to seeing temporary tables created with just the hash/number symbol, like this: CREATE TABLE #Test ( [Id] INT ) However, I've recently come across stored procedure code that specifies the schema name when creating temporary tables, for example: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[#Test] ( [Id] INT ) Is there any reason why you would want to do this? If you're only specifying the user's default schema, does it make any difference? Does this refer to the [dbo] schema in the local database or the tempdb database?

    Read the article

  • Best way to stop SQL Injection in PHP

    - by Andrew G. Johnson
    So specifically in a mysql database. Take the following code and tell me what to do. // connect to the mysql database $unsafe_variable = $_POST["user-input"]; mysql_query("INSERT INTO table (column) VALUES ('" . $unsafe_variable . "')"); // disconnect from the mysql database

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Concatenate string column value to 5 char long

    - by mrp
    Scenario: I have a table1(col1 char(5)); A value in table1 may '001' or '01' or '1'. Requirement: Whatever value in col1, I need to retrive it in 5 char length concatenate with leading '0' to make it 5 char long. Technique I applied: select right(('00000' + col1),5) from table1; I didn't see any reason, why it doesn't work? but it didn't. Can anyone help me, how I can achieve the desired result?

    Read the article

  • How to model a mutually exclusive relationship in sql server

    - by littlechris
    Hi, I have to add functionality to an existing application and I've run into a data situation that I'm not sure how to model. I am being restricted to the creation of new tables and code. If I need to alter the existing structure I think my client may reject the proposal..although if its the only way to get it right this is what I will have to do. I have an Item table that can me link to any number of tables, and these tables may increase over time. The Item can only me linked to one other table, but the record in the other table may have many items linked to it. Examples of the tables/entities being linked to are "Person", "Vehicle", "Building", "Office". These are all separate tables. Example of Items are "Pen", "Stapler", "Cushion", "Tyre", "A4 Paper", "Plastic Bag", "Poster", "Decoration" For instance a "Poster" may be allocated to a "Person" or "Office" or "Building". In the future if they add a "Conference Room" table it may also be added to that. My intital thoughts are: Item { ID, Name } LinkedItem { ItemID, LinkedToTableName, LinkedToID } The LinkedToTableName field will then allow me to identify the correct table to link to in my code. I'm not overly happy with this solution, but I can't quite think of anything else. Please help! :) Thanks!

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Concatinate string column value to 5 char long

    - by mrp
    Scenario: I have a table1(col1 char(5)); A value in table1 may '001' or '01' or '1'. Requirement: Whatever value in col1, I need to retrive it in 5 char length concatenate with leading '0' to make it 5 char long. Technique I applied: select right(('00000' + col1),5) from table1; I didn't see any reason, why it doesn't work? but it didn't. Can anyone help me, how I can achieve the desired result?

    Read the article

  • Optimal way to convert to date

    - by IMHO
    I have legacy system where all date fields are maintained in YMD format. Example: 20101123 this is date: 11/23/2010 I'm looking for most optimal way to convert from number to date field. Here is what I came up with: declare @ymd int set @ymd = 20101122 select @ymd, convert(datetime, cast(@ymd as varchar(100)), 112) This is pretty good solution but I'm wandering if someone has better way doing it

    Read the article

  • How to index a table with a Type 2 slowly changing dimension for optimal performance

    - by The Lazy DBA
    Suppose you have a table with a Type 2 slowly-changing dimension. Let's express this table as follows, with the following columns: * [Key] * [Value1] * ... * [ValueN] * [StartDate] * [ExpiryDate] In this example, let's suppose that [StartDate] is effectively the date in which the values for a given [Key] become known to the system. So our primary key would be composed of both [StartDate] and [Key]. When a new set of values arrives for a given [Key], we assign [ExpiryDate] to some pre-defined high surrogate value such as '12/31/9999'. We then set the existing "most recent" records for that [Key] to have an [ExpiryDate] that is equal to the [StartDate] of the new value. A simple update based on a join. So if we always wanted to get the most recent records for a given [Key], we know we could create a clustered index that is: * [ExpiryDate] ASC * [Key] ASC Although the keyspace may be very wide (say, a million keys), we can minimize the number of pages between reads by initially ordering them by [ExpiryDate]. And since we know the most recent record for a given key will always have an [ExpiryDate] of '12/31/9999', we can use that to our advantage. However... what if we want to get a point-in-time snapshot of all [Key]s at a given time? Theoretically, the entirety of the keyspace isn't all being updated at the same time. Therefore for a given point-in-time, the window between [StartDate] and [ExpiryDate] is variable, so ordering by either [StartDate] or [ExpiryDate] would never yield a result in which all the records you're looking for are contiguous. Granted, you can immediately throw out all records in which the [StartDate] is greater than your defined point-in-time. In essence, in a typical RDBMS, what indexing strategy affords the best way to minimize the number of reads to retrieve the values for all keys for a given point-in-time? I realize I can at least maximize IO by partitioning the table by [Key], however this certainly isn't ideal. Alternatively, is there a different type of slowly-changing-dimension that solves this problem in a more performant manner?

    Read the article

  • T-SQL MERGE - finding out which action it took

    - by IanC
    I need to know if a MERGE statement performed an INSERT. In my scenario, the insert is either 0 or 1 rows. Test code: DECLARE @t table (C1 int, C2 int) DECLARE @C1 INT, @C2 INT set @c1 = 1 set @c2 = 1 MERGE @t as tgt USING (SELECT @C1, @C2) AS src (C1, C2) ON (tgt.C1 = src.C1) WHEN MATCHED AND tgt.C2 != src.C2 THEN UPDATE SET tgt.C2 = src.C2 WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN INSERT VALUES (src.C1, src. C2) OUTPUT deleted.*, $action, inserted.*; SELECT inserted.* The last line doesn't compile (no scope, unlike a trigger). I can't get access to @action, or the output. Actually, I don't want any output meta data. How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • MS SQL Server 2008 Stored Procedure Result as Column Default Value

    - by user337501
    First of all, thank you guys. You always know how to direct me when I cant even find the words to explain what the heck im trying to do. The default values of the columns on a couple of my tables need to equal the result of some complicated calculations on other columns in other tables. My first thought is to simply have the column default value equal the result of a stored procedure. I would also have one or more of the parameters pulled from the columns in the calling table. I don't know the syntax of how to do it though, and any time the word "stored" and "procedure" land next to each other in google I'm flooded with info on Parameter default values and nothing relating to what I actually want. Half of that was more of a vent than a question...any ideas though? And plz plz dont say "Well, you could use an On-Insert Trigger to..."

    Read the article

  • SQL Server - In clause with a declared variable

    - by Melursus
    Let say I got the following : DECLARE @ExcludedList VARCHAR(MAX) SET @ExcludedList = 3 + ', ' + 4 + ' ,' + '22' SELECT * FROM A WHERE Id NOT IN (@ExcludedList) Error : Conversion failed when converting the varchar value ', ' to data type int. I understand why the error is there but I don't know how to solve it...

    Read the article

  • Retrieving multiple rows in SQL Server but distinct filtering only on one

    - by Nicklas
    I have this: SELECT Product.ProductID, Product.Name, Product.GroupID, Product.GradeID, AVG(tblReview.Grade) AS Grade FROM Product left Join tblReview ON Product.GroupID = tblReview.GroupID WHERE (Product.CategoryID = @CategoryID) GROUP BY Product.ProductID, Product.Name, Product.GroupID, Product.GradeID I would like to return only the rows where Product.Name is unique. If I make a SELECT DISTINCT the ProductID is different on every row so all the rows are unique.

    Read the article

  • help with t-sql self join

    - by stackoverflowuser
    Based on the following table ID Date State ----------------------------- 1 06/10/2010 Complete 1 06/04/2010 Pending 2 06/06/2010 Active 2 06/05/2010 Pending I want the following ouptut ID Date State --------------------------- 1 06/04/2010 Complete 2 06/05/2010 Active So date is the earliest one and State is the latest one. I am failing to apply self join on the table to get the output. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Insert a Join Statement - (Insert Data to Multiple Tables) - C#/SQL/T-SQL/.NET

    - by peace
    I have a Winform that has fields need to be filled by a user. All the fields doesn't belong to one table, the data will go to Customer table and CustomerPhone table, so i decided to do multiple inserts. I will insert appropriate data to CustomerPhone first then Insert the rest data to Customer table. Is it possible to Join an Insert OR Insert a Join? If show me a rough sample, i will be grateful. Many Thanks

    Read the article

  • SQL Server compare table entries for update

    - by Dave
    I have a trade table with several million rows. Each row represents the version of a trade. If I'm given a possibly new trade I compare it to the latest version in the trade table. If it has changed I add a new version, otherwise I do nothing. In order to compare the 2 trades I read the version from the trade table into my application. This doesn't work well when I'm given 10s of thousands of possibly new trades. Even batching reads to read in a 1000 trades at once and compare them the whole process can take several minutes. All the time is spent in the DB. I'm trying to find a way to compare the possibly new trades to the ones in the trade table without so much I/O. What I've come up with so far is adding a hash column to each row in the trade table. The hash is of all the trade fields. Then when I'm given possibly new trades I compute their hash, put the values into a temporary table, then find ones that are different. This feels very hacky. Is there a better way of doing it? Thanks

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158  | Next Page >