Search Results

Search found 8840 results on 354 pages for 'drupal developers'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 153/354 | < Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >

  • Multitasking the Android Way

    <b>Android Developer:</b> "Android is fairly unique in the ways it allows multiple applications to run at the same time. Developers coming from a different platform may find the way it operates surprising."

    Read the article

  • Website Development at a glance!

    Technology has made Website Development an easy process. The web is meant for both the developers and the users. The better usage of the web and the rising number of websites are a sign of this.

    Read the article

  • The Chrome Web Store

    We believe it should be easier for users to discover web apps and for developers to reach a large audience. That’s why today at Google I/O , we...

    Read the article

  • [JP ???] Google Cast SDK ??

    [JP 日本語] Google Cast SDK 概要 Chromecast 向けアプリケーションを開発される皆さんのために Google Cast SDK が公開されました。このエピソードでは、Google Cast SDK の概要についてお話... From: Google Developers Views: 301 10 ratings Time: 05:17 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Installing CDT on top of JDT: Conflicting Dependency

    - by someguy
    I am trying to install the CDT plugin on top my existing version of Eclipse, which was for Java. The problem is that I got this error message when I tried doing so via "Install New Software...": Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting dependency. Software being installed: Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools 4.0.3.200802251018 (org.eclipse.cdt.feature.group 4.0.3.200802251018) Software currently installed: Eclipse IDE for Java Developers 1.3.1.20100916-1202 (epp.package.java 1.3.1.20100916-1202) Only one of the following can be installed at once: International Components for Unicode for Java (ICU4J) 4.2.1.v20100412 (com.ibm.icu 4.2.1.v20100412) com.ibm.icu 3.6.1.v20070906 Cannot satisfy dependency: From: Eclipse IDE for Java Developers 1.3.1.20100916-1202 (epp.package.java 1.3.1.20100916-1202) To: org.eclipse.epp.package.java.feature.feature.group [1.3.1.20100916-1202] Cannot satisfy dependency: From: Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools 4.0.3.200802251018 (org.eclipse.cdt.feature.group 4.0.3.200802251018) To: com.ibm.icu [3.4.0,4.0.0) Cannot satisfy dependency: From: EPP Java Package 1.3.1.20100916-1202 (org.eclipse.epp.package.java.feature.feature.group 1.3.1.20100916-1202) To: org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group 3.6.0 Cannot satisfy dependency: From: Eclipse RCP 3.6.0.v20100519-9OArFKvFtsd7WLUKh-DcYTS (org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group 3.6.0.v20100519-9OArFKvFtsd7WLUKh-DcYTS) To: com.ibm.icu [4.2.1.v20100412] Cannot satisfy dependency: From: Eclipse RCP 3.6.1.r361_v20100827-9OArFLdFjY-ThSQXmKvKz0_T (org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group 3.6.1.r361_v20100827-9OArFLdFjY-ThSQXmKvKz0_T) To: com.ibm.icu [4.2.1.v20100412] What can I do to solve this?

    Read the article

  • How to avoid Windows Genuine Advantage for an XP update?

    - by hlovdal
    I am about to apply updates to a windows xp installation I have not booted in a couple of years. When going to update.microsoft.com, it forced me first to accept an activex installation and now it wants me to install wga: Windows Update To use this latest version of Windows Update, you will need to upgrade some of its components. This version provides you with the following enhancements to our service: <... useless list of "advantages" ... Details Windows Genuine Advantage Validation Tool (KB892130) 1.1 MB , less than 1 minute The Windows Genuine Advantage Validation Tool enables you to verify that your copy of Microsoft Windows is genuine. The tool validates your Windows installation by checking Windows Product Identification and Product Activation status. Update for Windows XP (KB898461) 477 KB , less than 1 minute This update installs a permanent copy of Package Installer for Windows to enable software updates to have a significantly smaller download size. The Package Installer facilitates the install of software updates for Microsoft Windows operating systems and other Microsoft products. After you install this update, you may have to restart your system. Total: 1.5 MB , less than 1 minute I have heard nothing but bad things about wga, and I absolutely do not want it installed on my system (this answer seems to give some options). Searching for "windows xp" at microsoft's web pages brought up this page which says Windows XP Service Pack 3 Network Installation Package for IT Professionals and Developers Brief Description This installation package is intended for IT professionals and developers downloading and installing on multiple computers on a network. If you're updating just one computer, please visit Windows Update at http://update.microsoft.com . ... File Name: WindowsXP-KB936929-SP3-x86-ENU.exe I am currently downloading this file. Will installing this bring my installation up to date with security updates? What about later updates whenever a new problem is discovered, how can i update without using wga?

    Read the article

  • what web based tool, to allow a non-technical user to manage authorized keys files on a Linux (fedora/centos/ubuntu/debian) server

    - by Tom H
    (Edit: clarification below) We have a number of groups of developers that change frequently, and a security policy to require individual logins to servers using rsa or dsa public keys, which is achieved via the standard method of adding id_dsa.pub to their authorized keys file. I am using chef to sync the user accounts across machines, however our previous method of using webmin to manage the user passwords is not designed for key based auth, and hence is not easy to use for non-technical users. The developers are logging in from the WAN using ssh, they can either provide their own key, or an administrator will send them a private key. The development machines are located in the cloud and we have a single server available to host the master set of accounts. Obviously I could deploy ldap or other centralised authentication system, but that seems a bit over blown when webmin worked well for the simple case. It is easy to achieve synchronised users, groups and passwords across a bunch of low security development boxes using webmin clustered users and groups. However looking at the currently installed webmin it is not so easy to create the authorized keys as it is to create user accounts and passwords. (its possible, but its not easy - some functionality is in the usermin module, or would required some tedious steps) Ideally I'd like a web interface that is pretty much dedicated to creating users and groups, and can generate key pairs on the fly, and can accepted pasted in public keys to add to the users authorized keys file. If the tool sync'ed the users and keys as well, that would be great, but I can use chef to do that part if the accounts are created correctly on the "master" server.

    Read the article

  • Four disks - RAID 10 or two mirrored pairs?

    - by ewwhite
    I have this discussion with developers quite often. The context is an application running in Linux that has a medium amount of disk I/O. The servers are HP ProLiant DL3x0 G6 with four disks of equal size @ 15k rpm, backed with a P410 controller and 512MB of battery or flash-based cache. There are two schools of thought here, and I wanted some feedback... 1). I'm of the mind that it makes sense to create an array containing all four disks set up in a RAID 10 (1+0) and partition as necessary. This gives the greatest headroom for growth, has the benefit of leveraging the higher spindle count and better fault-tolerance without degradation. 2). The developers think that it's better to have multiple RAID 1 pairs. One for the OS and one for the application data, citing that the spindle separation would reduce resource contention. However, this limits throughput by halving the number of drives and in this case, the OS doesn't really do much other than regular system logging. Additionally, the fact that we have the battery RAID cache and substantial RAM seems to negate the impact of disk latency... What are your thoughts?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >