Search Results

Search found 16552 results on 663 pages for 'incremental search'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 155/663 | < Previous Page | 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162  | Next Page >

  • Is multiple domain names and links from same IP causing poor search engine rankings?

    - by John
    I have an ecommerce website which is not doing so well in Google. I am trying to improve this of course, and am looking at some possibilities for why it isn't doing well. The website has four domain names, all of which have been indexed by Google. A few months ago I applied 301 redirects to any requests for two of the domain names so now it is down to two domain names (one is a .net, the other is a .com.au, the others were .net.au and .com). I prefer to use my main domain name (the .com.au), but one of the names has been around for a long time and has more inbound links. According to a PageRank tool, both are PR2. It is a Classic ASP site and up until recently had a lot of querystring parameters. In the last week or so I added URL rewriting so there is now no parameters for most pages. I don't do 301 redirects from the old URLs but instead I add the META canonical tag indicating the preferred new URL. At the same time I redesigned the site and improved title tags, META descriptions, and H tags but it hasn't been long enough yet for Google to index many of these yet. I also looked at what pages Google has indexed and strangely it has some strange pages in the index, there are a lot of pages which are actual keyword searches (more a bunch of random letters than an actual word). What I mean is that it is as if they had typed in something to search for in my search box - there are no links to pages like this and the only way of getting this is to type something in to the search box). So I added a META robots tag with noindex,nofollow anytime that I render pages like this. Years ago I set up a fake price comparison site which lists all my products and links back to my site. It has a different keyword rich domain name but is on the same server and same IP address. It's a completely different layout but does have the same product categories and product descriptions (although I have stripped formatting out of them so they are not identical except in text). I also have a few blog sites which again are on the same server/IP and all have advertising for the website. My questions are: What should I do with the multiple domains, just use one, or continue with two or more? Should I add 301 redirects, not just the META canonical tag? Any idea about Google indexing my search results page, and did I do the right thing with the META robots tag? Is the fake price comparison site likely to be causing problems? Are all the links to the site from other domain names but the same IP address likely to be causing problems? Thanks for any help. Sorry for so many questions in one.

    Read the article

  • Why Does On-Page Search Engine Optimization Work So Well?

    On-page search engine optimization has been around since an inordinately long time - probably it is the first kind of SEO that marketers began to use - but it is only lately that people have begun to understand its great efficacy in bolstering the prospects of any website. The term is used to describe all methods you use on the page of the website in order to enhance its prospects with the search engines.

    Read the article

  • What Are the Top 4 Search Engine Optimization Techniques of Today?

    Today, with the over-whelming competitions among the web masters in competing for customers to increase their sales and profit, finding ways to increase to optimize their websites is not really very difficult. There are whole lots of SEO (Search engine optimization) techniques which can be found over the internet today, which majority of them are really very user friendly which even a novice web-master with limited HTML knowledge find it not that difficult to get the most out of it as long as they have the will to learn and improve in their search ranking.

    Read the article

  • How Does a Landing Page Affect Search Engine Optimization?

    Search engine optimization or SEO for short is one of the many those new to online commercial have to deal with when setting up their web presence. One SEO related question that seems to come up frequently is "How does a landing page affect search engine optimization, and if so to what degree"? The short answer is, yes it does.

    Read the article

  • Natural Search Engine Optimization - Don't "Game the System" Or You Will Get Banned!

    When focusing on natural search engine optimization, it is important that you keep the process "white hat." You see, when it comes to SEO, there are basically three schools of thought: White hat, Gray hat, and Black hat. As you can probably infer, white hat is following the rules, gray hat is a little in between, and black hat is going against parameters that Google and other major search engines have set for ethical SEO practices.

    Read the article

  • Wordpress nav not visible in pages like articles, blog & search

    - by kwek-kwek
    My wordpress*(a custom template)* nav is all working on all of the pages but now I found out that the Main nav doesn't show on this pages All pages e.g. search.php, single.php, index.php, page.php all has <?php get_header(); ?> I really don't know whats wrong. Here is the code for my header.php <?php /** * @package WordPress * @subpackage Default_Theme */ ?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" <?php language_attributes() ?>> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="<?php bloginfo('html_type'); ?>; charset=<?php bloginfo('charset'); ?>" /> <title><?php bloginfo('name'); ?> <?php wp_title(); ?></title> <link rel="stylesheet" href="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_url'); ?>" type="text/css" media="screen,projection" /> <link rel="stylesheet" href="<?php bloginfo('template_url'); ?>/css/sifr.css" type="text/css" /> <script src="<?php bloginfo('template_url'); ?>/js/sifr.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<?php bloginfo('template_url'); ?>/js/sifr-config.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="http://cdn.jquerytools.org/1.1.2/jquery.tools.min.js"></script> <?php wp_head(); ?> </head> <?php $current_page = $post->ID; $parent = 1; while($parent) { $page_query = $wpdb->get_row("SELECT post_name, post_parent FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE ID = '$current_page'"); $parent = $current_page = $page_query->post_parent; if(!$parent) $parent_name = $page_query->post_name; } ?> <body id="<?php echo (is_page()) ? "$parent_name" : ((is_home()) ? "blog" : ((is_search()) ? "other" : ((is_single()) ? "blog" : "blog"))); ?>"> <div id="BGtie"> <!--HEAD WRAPPER--> <div id="headwrapper"> <!--HEADER--> <div id="headContainer"> <div id="nameTag"> <a href="<?php echo get_option('home'); ?>/"><?php bloginfo('name'); ?></a> </div> <!--TOP NAV--> <div id="topNav"> <ul> <li><a href="<?php bloginfo('url'); ?>home">Home</a></li> <li><a href="#">Request info</a></li> <li><a href="#">Contact us</a></li> <?php do_action('icl_language_selector'); ?> </ul> </div> <!--END TOP NAV--> <!--MAIN NAV--> <?php if ( is_page() AND (strtolower(ICL_LANGUAGE_CODE) == 'fr') ) {include("main-nav-fr.php");} ?> <?php if (is_page() AND (strtolower(ICL_LANGUAGE_CODE) == 'en')) include("main-nav-en.php") ?> <!--END MAIN NAV--> </div> <!--END HEADER--> </div> <!--END HEAD WRAPPER--> </div>

    Read the article

  • Using django-haystack, how do I perform a search with only partial terms?

    - by Sri Raghavan
    I've got a Haystack/xapian search index for django.contrib.auth.models.User. The template is simply {{object.get_full_name}} as I intend for a user to type in a name and be able to search for it. My issue is this: if I search, say, Sri (my full first name) I come up with a result for the user object pertaining to my name. However, if I search Sri Ragh - that is, my full name, and part of my last name, I get no results. How can I set Haystack up so that I can get the appropriate results for partial queries? (I essentially want it to search *Sri Ragh*, but I don't know if wildcards would actually do the trick, or how to implement them). This is my search query: results = SearchQuerySet().filter(content='Sri Ragh')

    Read the article

  • The SharePoint Search Dropdown shows only This site as the scope.

    - by Mac
    Hi All, I have a team site in which the Search scope dropdown only shows This site and it doesn't show All Sites and People in the dropdown.Any one knows why? I have not enabled Custom scopes in Search settings for this site because I don't have Search Center created. If I create search center and specify as a custom scope in this site I can see all 3 scopes in the dropdown. I am just trying to understand whether I need to have Search Center created to have all these shared scopes getting displayed in the Search Scopes drop down?

    Read the article

  • depth first search graph by using linked list

    - by programmerwannabe
    im using mac book and i cannot read the text file using this code. moreover, can you guys please add function(graph is connected?, and is this graph tree?) inputA.txt consist 1 2 1 6 1 5 2 3 2 6 3 4 3 6 4 5 4 6 5 6 #include <stdio.h> #include <memory.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define MAX 10 #define TRUE 1 #define FALSE 0 typedef struct Graph{ int vertex; struct Graph* link; } g_node; typedef struct graphType{ int x; int visited[MAX]; g_node* adjList_H[MAX]; } graphType; typedef struct stack{ int data; struct stack* link; } s_node; s_node* top; void push(int item){ s_node* n=(s_node*)malloc(sizeof(s_node)); n->data = item; n->link = top; top = n; } int pop(){ int item; s_node* n=top; if(top == NULL){ puts("\nstack is empty!\n"); return 0; } else { item = n-> data; top = n->link; free(n); return item; } } void createGraph(graphType* g){ int v; g->x = 1; for(v=1 ; v < MAX ; v++){ g -> visited[v] = FALSE; g -> adjList_H[v] = NULL; } } void insertVertex(graphType* g, int v){ if(((g->x)) > MAX){ puts("\n it has been overed the number of vertex\n"); return ; } g -> x++; } void insertEdge(graphType* g, int u, int v){ g_node* node; if(u >= g -> x || v >= g -> x){ puts("\n no vertex in the graph\n"); return ; } node = (g_node*)malloc(sizeof(g_node)); node -> vertex = v; node -> link = g -> adjList_H[u]; g-> adjList_H[u] = node; } void print_adjList(graphType* g){ int i; g_node *p; for(i=1 ; i<g -> x ; i++){ printf("\n\t\t vertex %d adjacency list ", i); p = g -> adjList_H[i]; while(p){ printf("-> %d", p-> vertex); p = p-> link; } } } void DFS_adjList(graphType* g, int v) { g_node* w; top = NULL; push(v); g->visited[v] = TRUE; printf(" %d", v); while(top != NULL){ w=g->adjList_H[v]; while(w){ if (!g->visited[w->vertex]){ push(w->vertex); g->visited[w->vertex] = TRUE; printf(" %d", w->vertex); v = w->vertex; w=g->adjList_H[v]; } else w= w->link; } v = pop(); } } int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) { FILE *fp; char mychar; char arr[][2]={0, }; int j, k; int i; graphType *G9; G9 = (graphType*)malloc(sizeof(graphType)); createGraph(G9); for(i=1; i<7 ; i++) insertVertex(G9, i); fp = fopen("inputD.txt", "r"); for(j = 0 ; j< 10 ; j++){ for(k = 0 ; k < 2 ; k++){ mychar = fgetc(fp); if(mychar = EOF){ j=10; break; } else if(mychar == ' ') continue; else if(mychar <= '9' || mychar >= '1'){ arr[j][k] = mychar; printf("%d%d", arr[i][k]); } } } insertEdge(G9, 1, 2); insertEdge(G9, 1, 6); insertEdge(G9, 1, 5); insertEdge(G9, 2, 3); insertEdge(G9, 2, 6); insertEdge(G9, 3, 4); insertEdge(G9, 3, 6); insertEdge(G9, 4, 5); insertEdge(G9, 4, 6); insertEdge(G9, 5, 6); insertEdge(G9, 6, 5); insertEdge(G9, 6, 4); insertEdge(G9, 5, 4); insertEdge(G9, 6, 3); insertEdge(G9, 4, 3); insertEdge(G9, 6, 2); insertEdge(G9, 3, 2); insertEdge(G9, 5, 1); insertEdge(G9, 6, 1); insertEdge(G9, 2, 1); printf("\n graph adjacency list "); print_adjList(G9); printf("\n \n//////////////////////////////////////////////\n\n depth fist search >> "); DFS_adjList(G9, 1); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • SEO for a list of products with filters

    - by dana
    I am a wondering if there is a recommended "best practice" for a product search SEO. I know to create a dynamic sitemap file that lists links to all products in the site. However, I want to implement a a bookmark-able "advanced search". Should I let search engines index any of the results? Take the following parameters for a search on a make believe used car website: minprice (minimum price in dollars) maxprice (maximum price in dollars) make (honda, audi, volvo) model (accord, A4, S40) minyear (minimum model year) maxyear (maximum model year) minmileage (minimum mileage) maxmileage (maximum mileage) Given these parameters, there could be an infinite number of search combinations: Price Between $10,000 and $20,000 /search?minprice=10000&maxprice&20000 Audis with less than 50k miles /search?model=audi&maxmileage=50000 More than 100,000 miles and less than $5,000 /search?minmileage=100000&maxprice=5000 etc. Over time, there may be inbound links to a variety of these types of searches, yet they are all slices of the same data. Should I allow for all of these searches to be indexed?

    Read the article

  • Page appears indexed in Google but not findable for any search terms?

    - by Jeff Atwood
    (Note that I am going to use screenshots here because I suspect writing about this will change the behavior over time.) If you do a Google search for uiviewcontroller best practices either with or without the quotes, you end up with results like this: Note that none of these pages resolve to the actual Stack Overflow question containing those words in the title. They resolve to either a) sites that are mirroring our creative commons data and correctly pointing back to the source question without nofollow, as properly specified by our attribution requirements or b) our own internal links to the question, but not the actual question itself. The actual page with the title ... Custom UIView and UIViewController best practices? ... does exist at this URL ... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3300183/custom-uiview-and-uiviewcontroller-best-practices ... and apparently it is present in Google's index! But why does it not appear when we search for uiviewcontroller best practices ? We know that Google contains this page in its index Our search terms match the title of the question Stack Overflow has much higher pagerank than the other sites that are mirroring this question under Creative Commons I don't get it. What are we doing wrong here?

    Read the article

  • Why are there unknown URLs in router log?

    - by Martin
    I recently looked at my router log. Why are a lot of requests that I don't send originated from a computer in my home network? They do not look like 3rd-party advertisements / images embedded in a page. The request have patterns, such as: top-visitor.com/look.php www.dottip.com/search/result.php?aff=8755&req=nickelodeon+games www.placeca.com/search/result.php?aff=3778&req=wireless+cell+phone www.bb5a.com/search.php?username=3348&keywords=flights www.blazerbox.com/search.php?username=2341&keywords=colorado+springs+real+estate www.freeautosource.com/search.php?username=sun100&keywords=vehicle www.1sp2.com/search.php?username=20190&keywords=las+the+hotel+vegas www.loadgeo.com/search/result.php?aff=10357&req=winamp www.exalt123.com/portal.php?ref=seo2007 www.7catalogs.com/search.php?username=la24&keywords=shutter www.theloaninstitute.com/search.php?username=kevin&keywords=webcam www.grammt.com/search.php?username=2530&keywords=bob And there are hundreds of these requests send within a second. So what's happening?

    Read the article

  • Will search engines reindex a page that has been set to redirect on to a newer site page?

    - by Luke Duddridge
    We were asked by a client to change a website so that any pages/Urls we were hosting on an older site would now redirect to a newer site hosted somewhere else and a different domain name to boot. We did this by changing each page in the IIS site management, to redirect to a url on their new domain instead of rendering a page locally. According to the redirect tool here: http://www.webconfs.com/redirect-check.php . What we have done is search engine friendly. Problem now is... the client has been on a course learning all about meta tags and so thinks they have a better understanding of the "matrix" (remember there is no spoon). As Google still has the older site appearing in a search, this isnt helping matters. I have tried to explain, we have to wait for Google to reindex. I'm not blowing smoke am I? I'm now starting to wonder... will the older site always appear in a search, even though the pages don't exist? Is there a better way I should be redirecting their site to ensure google will stop keeping an index of pages that no longer exist and would instead replace them with the content in the newer site? a suggestion on the site mentioned above is to use the code: Response.Status="301 Moved Permanently" Response.AddHeader "Location","http://www.new-url.com/" Does using the option in the IIS management tool to redirect the url not do the same?

    Read the article

  • OpenSearchDescriptions good or bad signal in Google's eyes?

    - by JeremyB
    I noticed a site using this tag: <link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" title="XXXXXXXXX" href="http://www.XXXXXXXXXX.com/api/opensearch" /> As I understand it (based on http://www.opensearch.org/Home), this tag is a way of describing search results (so you use it on pages which contain search results) to make it easier for other search engines to understand and use your results. Given that Matt Cutts has said Google generally frowns on "search results within search results" is using this tag a bad idea on a page that you hope to achieve a good ranking in Google?

    Read the article

  • Asterix in URL?

    - by KajMagnus
    Are there any reasons I shouldn't use an asterix (*) in a URL? Background: With asterixes, I could provide these nice and user friendly (or what do you think??) URLs: example.com/some/folder/search-phrase* means search for pages with names starting with "search-phrase", located in /some/folder/. example.com/some/**/*search-phrase* means search for any page with "search-phrase" anywhere in its name. example.com/some/folder/* means list all pages in /some/folder/ (rather than showing the /some/folder/index page).

    Read the article

  • Can I use asterisks in URLs?

    - by KajMagnus
    Are there any reasons I shouldn't use an asterisk (*) in a URL? Background: With asterisks, I could provide these nice and user friendly (or what do you think??) URLs: example.com/some/folder/search-phrase* means search for pages with names starting with "search-phrase", located in /some/folder/. example.com/some/**/*search-phrase* means search for any page with "search-phrase" anywhere in its name. example.com/some/folder/* means list all pages in /some/folder/ (rather than showing the /some/folder/index page).

    Read the article

  • Is hidden content (display: none;) -indexed- by search engines? [closed]

    - by user568458
    Possible Duplicate: How bad is it to use display: none in CSS? We've established on this site before (in this question) that, since there are so many legitimate uses for hiding content with display: none; when creating interactive features, that sites aren't automatically penalised for content that is hidden this way (so long as it doesn't look algorithmically spammy). Google's Webmaster guidelines also make clear that a good practice when using content that is initially legitimately hidden for interactivity purposes is to also include the same content in a <noscript> tag, and Google recommend that if you design and code for users including users with screen readers or javascript disabled, then 9 times out of 10 good relevant search rankings will follow (though their specific advice seems more written for cases where javascript writes new content to the page). JavaScript: Place the same content from the JavaScript in a tag. If you use this method, ensure the contents are exactly the same as what’s contained in the JavaScript, and that this content is shown to visitors who do not have JavaScript enabled in their browser. So, best practice seems pretty clear. What I can't find out is, however, the simple factual matter of whether hidden content is indexed by search engines (but with potential penalties if it looks 'spammy'), or, whether it is ignored, or, whether it is indexed but with a lower weighting (like <noscript> content is, apparently). (for bonus points it would be great to know if this varies or is consistent between display: none;, visibility: hidden;, etc, but that isn't crucial). This is different to the other questions on display:none; and SEO - those are about good and bad practice and the answers are discussions of good and bad practice, I'm interested simply in the factual 'Yes or no' question of whether search engines index, or ignore, content that is in display: none; - something those other questions' answers aren't totally clear on. One other question has an answer, "Yes", supported by a link to an article that doesn't really clear things up: it establishes that search engines can spot that text is hidden, it discusses (again) whether hidden text causes sites to be marked as spam, and ultimately concludes that in mid 2011, Google's policy on hidden text was evolving, and that they hadn't at that time started automatically penalising display:none; or marking it as spam. It's clear that display: none; isn't always spam and isn't always treated as spam (many Google sites use it...): but this doesn't clear up how, or if, it is indexed. What I will do will be to follow the guidelines and make sure that all the content that is initially hidden which regular users can explore using javascript-driven interactivity is also structured in way that noscript/screenreader users can use. So I'm not interested in best practice, opinions etc because best practice seems to be really clear: accessibility best practices boosts SEO. But I'd like to know what exactly will happen: whether any display: none; content I have alongside <noscript> or otherwise accessibility-optimised content will be be ignored, or indexed again, or picked up to compare against the <noscript> content but not indexed... etc.

    Read the article

  • Search in a List<DataRow>?

    - by grady
    Hello, I have a List which I create from a DataTabe which only has one column in it. Lets say the column is called MyColumn. Each element in the list is an object array containing my columns, in this case, only one (MyColumn). Whats the most elegant way to check if that object array contains a certain value? Thanks

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162  | Next Page >