Search Results

Search found 5131 results on 206 pages for 'gung foo'.

Page 156/206 | < Previous Page | 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163  | Next Page >

  • Resolve instance - Autofac

    - by user137348
    I'm trying to figure out how to resolve a instance somewhere in the code. At the application startup I registered a type static void Main() { var builder = new ContainerBuilder(); builder.RegisterType<Foo>().As<IFoo>(); } Now, how can I resolve an instance somewhere in the code ? In structure mam there is a static object ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IFoo>()

    Read the article

  • Is it alright to call len() in a loop's conditional statement?

    - by DormoTheNord
    In C, it is considered bad practice to call strlen like this: for ( i = 0; strlen ( str ) != foo; i++ ) { // stuff } The reason, of course, is that it is inefficient since it "counts" the characters in a string multiple times. However, in Python, I see code like this quite often: for i in range ( 0, len ( list ) ): # stuff Is this bad practice? Should I store the result of len() in a variable and use that?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu Bash Script changing file names chronologicaly

    - by Manifold
    I have this bash script where I am trying to change all *.txt files in a directory to their date of last modification. This is the script: #!/bin/bash # Renames the .txt files to the date modified # FROM: foo.txt Created on: 2012-04-18 18:51:44 # TO: 20120418_185144.txt for i in *.txt do mod_date=$(stat --format %y "$i"|awk '{print $1"_"$2}'|cut -f1 -d'.'|sed 's/[: -]//g') mv "$i" "$mod_date".txt done The error I am getting is: renamer.sh: 6: renamer.sh: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting "do") Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time.

    Read the article

  • How to create an after_save callback on runtime

    - by dorelal
    I am using ruby on rails 2.3.5 . I have user instance. On run time depending on certain conditions I want to add an after_save callback just for this instance. The other issue is that this after_save should take a block or a proc as parameter. What I want is something like this. This is psuedo code. user = User.first proc = Proc.new do puts 'this is foo' end user.after_save proc

    Read the article

  • How to create a unique web page address in ASP.NET

    - by Jim
    Is there a standard way to create unique web page address in ASP.NET? I'm sending surveys to customers and will be including a link to the web page. For example: http://www.mysurveypages.foo/survey/UniqueID I would then customize the survey based on who I sent it to. I know it can be done by passing in a unique parameter to a page but I curious about doing it this way.

    Read the article

  • "Slice" out one element from a python dictionary

    - by BCS
    I have a dictionary: D = { "foo" : "bar", "baz" : "bip" } and I want to create new dictionary that has a copy of one of it's elements k. So if k = "baz": R = { "baz" : "bip" } what I'v got now is: R = { k : D[k] } But in my case k is a complex expression and I've got a whole stack of these. Caching k in a temporary looks about as ugly as the original option. What I'm looking for is a better (cleaner) way to do this.

    Read the article

  • url rewrite for aspx page

    - by user177883
    I have a page, called foo.aspx and i d like to rewrite the url as bar.something How to do this? How does url rewrite happens in asp.net Should i create a generic handler? or should i get some url rewrite modules and add to app?

    Read the article

  • Using type passed as a template in C++

    - by MeDiCS
    Is it possible to actually use the type passed as a template for control flow? I'd like to write a function that uses templates, which in turn calls another function based on the type passed: template <class T> void test_function (T var) { //Do stuff if (T == char) { bar (var); } else { foo (var); } //Do even more stuff } If not, I'll have to fallback to enums...

    Read the article

  • how to call operator () in c++

    - by anish
    in c++ i have following code class Foobar{ public: Foobar * operator()(){ return new Foobar; } My quesion is how to call the (); if i do Foobar foo() the constructor gets called i am confused about behaviour of () can some explain me

    Read the article

  • echo that outputs to stderr

    - by BCS
    Is there a standard bash tool that acts like echo but outputs to stderr rather than stdout? I know I can do echo foo 1>&2 but it's kinda ugly and, I suspect, error prone (e.g. more likely to get edited wrong when things change).

    Read the article

  • How to define an aspectj pointcut that picks out all constructors of a class that has a specific annotation?

    - by PineForest
    Here is the annotation: @Target(value = ElementType.TYPE) @Retention(value = RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Inherited public @interface MyAnnotation { String name(); } Here is one annotated class: @MyAnnotation(name="foo") public class ClassA { public ClassA() { // Do something } } Here is a second annotated class: @MyAnnotation(name="bar") public class ClassB { public ClassB(String aString) { // Do something } } I am looking for an aspectj pointcut that correctly matches the constructors for ClassA and ClassB while not matching any other constructor for any other class NOT annotated by MyAnnotation.

    Read the article

  • Trouble with wstringstream

    - by Rosarch
    I have a wstringstream: wstringstream sstream; AlterSstream(sstream); sstream << "foo"; MessageBoxW( NULL, sstream.str().c_str(), L"subject", MB_OK ); This outputs a long string that looks nothing like what I put in it in AlterSstream(): 00000000002CEC58foo AlterSstream: void AlterSstream(wstringstream& outStream) { outStream << "odp"; } Why is this happening?

    Read the article

  • Difficulty with jQuery and input keydown event

    - by Rosarch
    I am making a simple JavaScript enhanced list. I want it to be a list of inputs, each with an 'Add' and 'Remove' button. If the user clicks 'Add', a new li will be added. If the user clicks 'Remove', that li will be removed. It works fine, except for hitting "enter" in an <input>. Currently, it always causes the Remove.click event handler to fire, unless there's only one item in the list. I'm not sure why. How can I suppress this? Here is the complete jQuery. My attempt to fix the "enter" issue is commented out, and it doesn't work. I suspect that I could be designing this code better; if you see an improvement I'd love to hear it. function make_smart_list(list) { var ADD_CLASS = 'foo-widget-Add'; var REMOVE_CLASS = 'foo-widget-Remove'; var jq_list = $(list); jq_list.parents('form').submit(function() { return false; }); function refresh_handlers() { jq_list.find(sprintf('.%s, .%s', REMOVE_CLASS, ADD_CLASS)).unbind('click'); // jq_list.find('input').unbind('submit'); // // jq_list.find('input').submit(function() { // var jq_this = $(this); // var next_button = jq_this.nextAll('button'); // if (next_button.hasClass(ADD_CLASS)) { // next_button.nextAll('button').click(); // return; // } // // if (next_button.hasClass(REMOVE_CLASS)) { // return false; // } // // }); jq_list.find("." + REMOVE_CLASS).click(function() { var jq_this = $(this); jq_this.parent().remove(); refresh_handlers(); return false; }); jq_list.find("." + ADD_CLASS).click(function() { var jq_this = $(this); if (jq_this.prevAll('input').val() == '') { return; } jq_this.parent().clone().appendTo(jq_this.parent().parent()); jq_this.parent().next().find('input').val('').focus(); jq_this.removeClass(ADD_CLASS).addClass(REMOVE_CLASS); jq_this.text('Remove'); refresh_handlers(); return false; }); } refresh_handlers(); } (sprintf is another script I have.)

    Read the article

  • Deprecate in Java 1.6

    - by iano
    In Java 1.5, to deprecate a method you would: @Deprecated int foo(int bar) { } Compiling this in Java 1.6 results in the following: Syntax error, annotations are only available if source level is 1.5 Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • safe dereferencing and deletion

    - by serejko
    Hi, I'm relatively new to C++ and OOP in general and currently trying to make such a class that allows to dereference and delete a dead or invalid pointer without any care of having undefined behavior or program fault in result, and I want to ask you is it a good idea and is there something similar which is already implemented by someone else? or maybe I'm doing something completely wrong? I've just started making it and here is the code I currently have: template<class T> class SafeDeref { public: T& operator *() { hash_set<T*>::iterator it = theStore.find(reinterpret_cast<T*>(ptr)); if (it != theStore.end()) return *this; return theDefaultObject; } T* operator ->() { hash_set<T*>::iterator it = theStore.find(reinterpret_cast<T*>(ptr)); if (it != theStore.end()) return this; return &theDefaultObject; } void* operator new(size_t size) { void* ptr = malloc(size * sizeof(T)); if (ptr != 0) theStore.insert(reinterpret_cast<T*>(ptr)); return ptr; } void operator delete(void* ptr) { hash_set<T*>::iterator it = theStore.find(reinterpret_cast<T*>(ptr)); if (it != theStore.end()) { theStore.erase(it); free(ptr); } } protected: static bool isInStore(T* ptr) { return theStore.find(ptr) != theStore.end(); } private: static T theDefaultObject; static hash_set<T*> theStore; }; The idea is that each class with the safe dereference should be inherited from it like this: class Foo : public SafeDeref<Foo> { void doSomething(); }; So... Any advices? Thanks in advance. P.S. If you're wondering why I need this... well, I'm creating a set of native functions for some scripting environment, and all of them use pointers to internally allocated objects as handles to them and they're able to delete them as well (input data can be wrong), so this is kinda protection from damaging host application's memory And I really sorry for my bad English

    Read the article

  • Static member class - declare class private and class member package-private?

    - by Helper Method
    Consider you have the following class public class OuterClass { ... private static class InnerClass { int foo; int bar; } } I think I've read somewhere (but not the official Java Tutorial) that if I would declare the static member classes attributes private, the compiler had to generate some sort of accessor methods so that the outer class can actually access the static member class's (which is effectively a package-private top level class) attributes. Any ideas on that?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163  | Next Page >