Search Results

Search found 40650 results on 1626 pages for 'multiple select'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 171/1626 | < Previous Page | 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178  | Next Page >

  • Summarising grouped records in a dataframe in R

    - by monch1962
    Hello all, I have a data frame in R that looks like this: > TimeOffset, Source, Length > 0 1 1500 > 0.1 1 1000 > 0.2 1 50 > 0.4 2 25 > 0.6 2 3 > 1.1 1 1500 > 1.4 1 18 > 1.6 2 2500 > 1.9 2 18 > 2.1 1 37 > ... and I want to convert it to > TimeOffset, Source, Length > 0.2 1 2550 > 0.6 2 28 > 1.4 1 1518 > 1.9 2 2518 > ... Trying to put this into English, I want to group consecutive records with the same 'Source' together, then printing out a single record per group showing the highest time offset in that group, the source, and the sum of the lengths in that group. The TimeOffset values will always increase. I suspect this is possible in R, but I really don't know where to start. In a pinch I could export the data frame out and do it in e.g. Python, but I'd prefer to stay within R if possible. Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide

    Read the article

  • Multiple task in one page?(php - mysql - jquery)

    - by python
    My goal is to build an application in a page that can be use multiple task(crud) for example in this html code.there are multiple submit,multiple action in the same page after (user submit (CURD) it will load result table below.) In juery how Can I do this.? <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.js"></script> <script> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#button1").click(function(){ $('form#crudform').attr({action: "script_1.php"}); $('form#crudform').submit(); }); $("#button2").click(function(){ $('form#crudform').attr({action: "script_2.php"}); $('form#crudform').submit(); }); $("#button3").click(function(){ $('form#crudform').attr({action: "script_3.php"}); $('form#crudform').submit(); }); }); </script> Form CRUD: <form id="crudform" method="post"> <p>Name: <input type="text" name="name"/></p> <p>Age: <input type="text" name="age"/></p> <input type="button" id="button1" value="Cancel" /> <input type="button" id="button2" value="Save" /> <input type="button" id="button3" value="Update" /> </form> Result: <form id="result" method="post"> <table border="1"> <tr> <tr><td></td><td>Name</td><td>Age</td> </tr> <tr><td><input type="checkbox" name="name1"></td><td>Name1</td><td>10</td><tr> <tr><td><input type="checkbox" name="name1"></td><td>Name2</td><td>15</td></tr> <tr><td><input type="checkbox" name="name3"></td><td>Name3</td><td>16</td></tr> </table> <input type="button" id="button4" value="change" /> <input type="button" id="button5" value="drop" /> </form> Anybody know the tutorials relating ..with my tasks.or tips,guide.....are welconme :)

    Read the article

  • Summarising grouped records in a dataframe in R (...again)

    - by monch1962
    Hello all, (I tried to ask this question earlier today, but later realised I over-simplified the question; the answers I received were correct, but I couldn't use them because of my over-simplification of the problem in the original question. Here's my 2nd attempt...) I have a data frame in R that looks like: "Timestamp", "Source", "Target", "Length", "Content" 0.1 , P1 , P2 , 5 , "ABCDE" 0.2 , P1 , P2 , 3 , "HIJ" 0.4 , P1 , P2 , 4 , "PQRS" 0.5 , P2 , P1 , 2 , "ZY" 0.9 , P2 , P1 , 4 , "SRQP" 1.1 , P1 , P2 , 1 , "B" 1.6 , P1 , P2 , 3 , "DEF" 2.0 , P2 , P1 , 3 , "IJK" ... and I want to convert this to: "StartTime", "EndTime", "Duration", "Source", "Target", "Length", "Content" 0.1 , 0.4 , 0.3 , P1 , P2 , 12 , "ABCDEHIJPQRS" 0.5 , 0.9 , 0.4 , P2 , P1 , 6 , "ZYSRQP" 1.1 , 1.6 , 0.5 , P1 , P2 , 4 , "BDEF" ... Trying to put this into English, I want to group consecutive records with the same 'Source' and 'Target' together, then print out a single record per group showing the StartTime, EndTime & Duration (=EndTime-StartTime) for that group, along with the sum of the Lengths for that group, and a concatenation of the Content (which will all be strings) in that group. The TimeOffset values will always increase throughout the data frame. I had a look at melt/recast and have a feeling that it could be used to solve the problem, but couldn't get my head around the documentation. I suspect it's possible to do this within R, but I really don't know where to start. In a pinch I could export the data frame out and do it in e.g. Python, but I'd prefer to stay within R if possible. Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide

    Read the article

  • Android: How to invalidate multiple parts of screen

    - by user342731
    I need to be able to selectively invalidate multiple (about 20) rectangles on the screen for performance reasons, so tried the following: Vector<Rect> myRects = new Vector<Rect>(); // ... add some Rects to myRects for (Rect r : myRects) { invalidate(r); } However this seems to invalidates a union of all the Rect's, forming one large rectangle which covers all of small ones I'm trying to invalidate. How can one invalidate multiple areas on the screen, and only those areas?

    Read the article

  • .NET | Persist multiple objects in minimum number of queries

    - by VarunGupta
    I have a list of objects which needs to be persisted in a SQL Server database table, where each object gets persisted as single record. i.e. List of objects result in insertion of multiple records. Trivial way of saving the objects is to loop over the list and fire a query/stored procedure/etc. for saving that record. But this results in multiple database interactions. Is there a way to persist the list of objects in lesser number of database interactions?

    Read the article

  • How to remove multiple instances and just have one instance while multiple function calls in php ?

    - by Rachel
    public function getHelperInstance() { $user = new Helper(); $user->set($result['data']); return $user; } I am calling getHelper() class multiple times and if $user is not empty than am calling getHelperInstance(), now in my case getHelperInstance() always creates a new instance of Helper() class and so every time I call getHelperInstance() function am creating a new instance of Helper() so is there any way where can I can just create one instance of Helper() and use it multiple times instead of creating a new instance everytime. Any suggestions !!! public function getHelper() { $user = array(); if (!empty($user)) { $user = $this->getHelperInstance(); } return $user; }

    Read the article

  • Need to get Multiple tables from SqlServer at a time

    - by narmadha
    Hi ,I am working with C#.net,I am using cursor concept in my storedprocedure,While executing it in Sqlserver it is showing Multiple tables,but it is not returning multiple Tables in the code,it is returning only the first table,The following is the code which i have used: DataSet ds = new DataSet("table1"); using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionstring)) { using (SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter("getworkpersondetails_Orderidwise", connection)) { da.SelectCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; SqlParameter param; param = new SqlParameter("@OrderId", SqlDbType.Int); param.Value = OrderId; da.SelectCommand.Parameters.Add(param); param = new SqlParameter("@CompanyId", SqlDbType.Int); param.Value = CompanyId; da.SelectCommand.Parameters.Add(param); connection.Open(); da.Fill(ds); connection.Close(); return ds; } }

    Read the article

  • From comma separated list to individual item result set. *mysql

    - by Raziel
    I'm doing some data migration from a horribly designed database to a less horribly designed database. There is a many to many relationship that has a primary key in one table that corresponds to a comma separated list in another. FK_ID | data ------------- 1,2 | foo 3 | bar 1,3,2 | blarg Is there a way to output the FK_ID field with each comma separated element as a single line in the result set? result set FK_ID | data ------------- 1 | foo 2 | foo 3 | bar 1 | blarg 2 | blarg 3 | blarg I'm thinking this would require some sort of recursive query which I don't think mysql has. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Windows Workflows - While Activity for creating multiple tasks not working

    - by Georgil Mathew
    I am using a while activity for creating multiple tasks for a workflow. The code is executed fine and the task is created when the loop runs only once. But when the loop runs twice or more, only one task is getting created. Also the WF status shows as Error Occured. All I want to do here is create multiple tasks (no of tasks depends on an entered column value) for the same user. Is it posible to use 'while' in this scenario? Or is there any other way to go ahead? NB: I am using state machine workflow.

    Read the article

  • PHP Flatten Array with multiple leaf nodes

    - by tafaju
    What is the best way to flatten an array with multiple leaf nodes so that each full path to leaf is a distinct return? array("Object"=>array("Properties"=>array(1, 2))); to yield Object.Properties.1 Object.Properties.2 I'm able to flatten to Object.Properties.1 but 2 does not get processed with recursive function: function flattenArray($prefix, $array) { $result = array(); foreach ($array as $key => $value) { if (is_array($value)) $result = array_merge($result, flattenArray($prefix . $key . '.', $value)); else $result[$prefix . $key] = $value; } return $result; } I presume top down will not work when anticipating multiple leaf nodes, so either need some type of bottom up processing or a way to copy array for each leaf and process (althought that seems completely inefficient)

    Read the article

  • One big call vs. multiple smaller TSQL calls

    - by BrokeMyLegBiking
    I have a ADO.NET/TSQL performance question. We have two options in our application: 1) One big database call with multiple result sets, then in code step through each result set and populate my objects. This results in one round trip to the database. 2) Multiple small database calls. There is much more code reuse with Option 2 which is an advantage of that option. But I would like to get some input on what the performance cost is. Are two small round trips twice as slow as one big round trip to the database, or is it just a small, say 10% performance loss? We are using C# 3.5 and Sql Server 2008 with stored procedures and ADO.NET.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Asserts in a Unit Test

    - by whatispunk
    I've just finished reading Roy Osherove's "The Art of Unit Testing" and I am trying to adhere to the best practices he lays out in the book. One of those best practices is to not use multiple asserts in a test method. The reason for this rule is fairly clear to me, but it makes me wonder... If I have a method like: public Foo MakeFoo(int x, int y, int z) { Foo f = new Foo(); f.X = x; f.Y = y; f.Z = z; return f; } Must I really write individual unit tests to assert each separate property of Foo is initialized with the supplied value? Is it really all that uncommon to use multiple asserts in a test method? FYI: I am using MSTest.

    Read the article

  • ssrs: one static row matrix, multiple columns will not filter out nulls

    - by pbarton99
    Using a ssrs 2005 matrix client side. I want to list the multiple addresses of one person, hence one row, multiple columns. The Column field is =Fields!StreetName.Value. The data details field is =First(Fields!StreetPrefix.Value) & " " & First(Fields!StreetName.Value). The datasource has a row for each address; however, some rows will have nulls since the datasource is composed of outer joins. The column grouping works, but the first column is always empty, (first 2 rows of datasource are null) addresses appear only after the empty column. I want to filter out nulls on the matrix, but its like the filter is ignored. I have also tried having the dataset return an empty string for a null streetname and setting the filter to =Fields!StreetName.Value != ="" but no difference. What am I missing?

    Read the article

  • a value that shows in select mode disappears in edit mode from a gridview column

    - by Jbob Johan
    i have a gridview(GridView1) with a few Bound Fields first one is Date (ActivityDate) from a table named "tblTime" i have managed to add one extra colum (manually), that is not bound that shows dayInWeek value according to the "ActivityDate" field programtically in CodeBehind but when i enter into Edit Mode , all Bound fields are showing their values correctly but the one column i have added manually will not show the value as it did in "select mode"(first mode b4 trying to edit) while im not a great dibbagger i have manged to view the cell's value (GridView1.Rows[e.NewEditIndex].Cells[1].Text) which does hold on to the day in week value but it does not appear in gridview edit mode only this is some of the code protected void GridView1_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e) { if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.Header) { e.Row.Cells[0].Text = "?????"; //Activity Date (in hebrew) e.Row.Cells[1].Text = "??? ?????"; //DayinWeek e.Row.Cells[2].Text = "??????"; //ActivityType (work seek vacation) named Reason e.Row.Cells[3].Text = "??? ?????"; //time finish (to Work) e.Row.Cells[4].Text = "??? ?????"; //Time out (of work) } if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow) { if (Convert.ToBoolean(ViewState["theSubIsclckd"]) == true) //if submit button clicked { try { string twekday1 = Convert.ToString(DataBinder.Eval(e.Row.DataItem, "ActiveDate")); twekday1 = twekday1.Remove(9, 11); //geting date only without the time- portion string[] arymd = twekday1.Split('/'); // spliting [d m y] in order to make int day = Convert.ToInt32(arymd[1]); // it into [m d y] ...also requierd int month = Convert.ToInt32(arymd[0]); // when i update the table int year = Convert.ToInt32(arymd[2]); DateTime ILDateInit = new DateTime(year, month, day); //finally extracting Day CultureInfo ILci = CultureInfo.CreateSpecificCulture("he-IL"); // in week //from the converted activity date string MyIL_DayInWeek = ILDateInit.ToString("dddd", ILci); ViewState["MyIL_DayInWeek"] = MyIL_DayInWeek; e.Row.Cells[1].Text = MyIL_DayInWeek; string displayReason = DataBinder.Eval(e.Row.DataItem, "Reason").ToString(); e.Row.Cells[2].Text = displayReason; } catch (System.Exception excep) { Js.functions.but bb = new Js.functions.but(); bb.buttonName = "rex"; bb.documentwrite = true; bb.testCsVar = excep.ToString(); bb.f1(bb); // this was supposed to throw exep in javaScript injected from code behid - alert } // just in case.. } } so that works for the non edit period of time then when i hit the edit ... no day in week shows THE aspX - after selcting date... name etc' , click on button to display gridview: <asp:Button ID="TheSubB" runat="server" Text="???" onclick="TheSubB_Click" /> <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" OnRowDataBound="GridView1_RowDataBound" onrowediting="GridView1_RowEditing" onrowcancelingedit="GridView1_RowCancelingEdit" OnRowUpdating="GridView1_RowUpdating" BackColor="LightGoldenrodYellow" BorderColor="Tan" BorderWidth="1px" CellPadding="2" ForeColor="Black" GridLines="None" AutoGenerateColumns="False" DataKeyNames="tId" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1" style="z-index: 1; left: 0%; top: 0%; position: relative; width: 812px; height: 59px; font-family:Arial; text-align: center;" AllowSorting="True" > <AlternatingRowStyle BackColor="PaleGoldenrod" /> <Columns> <asp:BoundField DataField="ActiveDate" HeaderText="ActiveDate" SortExpression="ActiveDate" ControlStyle-Width="70" DataFormatString="{0:dd/MM/yyyy}" > <ControlStyle Width="70px" /> </asp:BoundField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="???.???.??"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:TextBox ID="dayinW_EditTB" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> </EditItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="dayInW_editLabel" runat="server"></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:BoundField DataField="Reason" HeaderText="???? ?????" SortExpression="Reason" ControlStyle-Width="50"> <ControlStyle Width="50px" /> </asp:BoundField> <asp:BoundField DataField="TimeOut" HeaderText="TimeOut" SortExpression="TimeOut" ControlStyle-Width="50" DataFormatString="{0:HH:mm}" > <ControlStyle Width="50px"></ControlStyle> </asp:BoundField> <asp:BoundField DataField="TimeIn" HeaderText="TimeIn" SortExpression="TimeIn" ControlStyle-Width="50" DataFormatString="{0:HH:mm}" > <ControlStyle Width="50px"></ControlStyle> </asp:BoundField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="????" > <EditItemTemplate> <asp:ImageButton width="15" Height="15" ImageUrl="~/images/edit.png" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Update" Text="Update"> </asp:ImageButton> <asp:ImageButton Width="15" Height="15" ImageUrl="images/cancel.png" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel"> </asp:ImageButton> </EditItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:ImageButton width="25" Height="15" ImageUrl="images/edit.png" ID="EditIB" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Edit" AlternateText="????"></asp:ImageButton> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="???"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:ImageButton width="15" Height="15" ImageUrl="images/Delete.png" ID="DeleteIB" runat="server" CommandName="Delete" AlternateText="???" /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> <FooterStyle BackColor="Tan" /> <HeaderStyle BackColor="Tan" Font-Bold="True" /> <PagerStyle BackColor="PaleGoldenrod" ForeColor="DarkSlateBlue" HorizontalAlign="Center" /> <SelectedRowStyle BackColor="DarkSlateBlue" ForeColor="GhostWhite" /> <SortedAscendingCellStyle BackColor="#FAFAE7" /> <SortedAscendingHeaderStyle BackColor="#DAC09E" /> <SortedDescendingCellStyle BackColor="#E1DB9C" /> <SortedDescendingHeaderStyle BackColor="#C2A47B" /> </asp:GridView>

    Read the article

  • Loading the last related record instantly for multiple parent records using Entity framework

    - by Guillaume Schuermans
    Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework for the problem described below? I am trying for our next release to come up with a performant way to show the placed orders for the logged on customer. Of course paging is always a good technique to use when a lot of data is available I would like to see an answer without any paging techniques. Here's the story: a customer places an order which gets an orderstatus = PENDING. Depending on some strategy we move that order up the chain in order to get it APPROVED. Every change of status is logged so we can see a trace for statusses and maybe even an extra line of comment per status which can provide some extra valuable information to whoever sees this order in an interface. So an Order is linked to a Customer. One order can have multiple orderstatusses stored in OrderStatusHistory. In my testscenario I am using a customer which has 100+ Orders each with about 5 records in the OrderStatusHistory-table. I would for now like to see all orders in one page not using paging where for each Order I show the last relevant Status and the extra comment (if there is any for this last status; both fields coming from OrderStatusHistory; the record with the highest Id for the given OrderId). There are multiple scenarios I have tried, but I would like to see any potential other solutions or comments on the things I have already tried. Trying to do Include() when getting Orders but this still results in multiple queries launched on the database. Each order triggers an extra query to the database to get all orderstatusses in the history table. So all statusses are queried here instead of just returning the last relevant one, plus 100 extra queries are launched for 100 orders. You can imagine the problem when there are 100000+ orders in the database. Having 2 computed columns on the database: LastStatus, LastStatusInformation and a regular Linq-Query which gets those columns which are available through the Entity-model. The problem with this approach is the fact that those computed columns are determined using a scalar function which can not be changed without removing the formula from the computed column, etc... In the end I am very familiar with SQL and Stored procedures, but since the rest of the data-layer uses Entity Framework I would like to stick to it as long as possible, even though I have my doubts about performance. Using the SQL approach I would write something like this: WITH cte (RN, OrderId, [Status], Information) AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY OrderId ORDER BY Id DESC), OrderId, [Status], Information FROM OrderStatus ) SELECT o.Id, cte.[Status], cte.Information AS StatusInformation, o.* FROM [Order] o INNER JOIN cte ON o.Id = cte.OrderId AND cte.RN = 1 WHERE CustomerId = @CustomerId ORDER BY 1 DESC; which returns all orders for the customer with the statusinformation provided by the Common Table Expression. Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework?

    Read the article

  • Wireshark Plugin: Dissecting Payloads With Multiple Packets Per UDP Frame

    - by John Dibling
    I am writing a Wireshark plugin to dissect a protocol that places multiple application-level packets in a single UDP frame. There is no enclosing protocol that indicates how many packets there are in the frame. So essentially, the payload coming down the wire will look like this: uint64 sequence1 uint64 data1 uint8 flags1 uint64 sequence2 uint64 data2 uint8 flags2 : : : uint64 sequence_n uint64 data_n uint8 flags_n In my server code that actually processes this information, I simply loop through the frame until I reach the end. In looking through the plugins included with the wireshark source code, I didn't see any protocols that did any looping like this. I know other protocols pack multiple payloads per frame. What is the cannonical or standard way to handle protocols like this in a Wireshark dissector?

    Read the article

  • SQL - Joining multiple records to one record

    - by ho
    I've got a SQL Server database with the the following tables: Client (ClientID, ClientName) SalesAgent (AgentID, AgentName) Item (ItemID, Description) Purchase (PurchaseID, ClientID, Price) PurchaseSalesAgent (PurchaseID, AgentID) Each purchase is only ever one item to one client but there can have been multiple agents involved. I want to return the following list of columns: ClientName, Description, Price, Agents Where Agents is the names of all the agents involved in the purchase. Either as a comma separated list or as multiple columns with one agent in each. I'm looking for a way that's compatible with SQL Server 2000 but I'd also be interested in if there's a better way of doing it in SQL Server 2008.

    Read the article

  • Rails 3 query in multiple date ranges

    - by NeoRiddle
    Suppose we have some date ranges, for example: ranges = [ [(12.months.ago)..(8.months.ago)], [(7.months.ago)..(6.months.ago)], [(5.months.ago)..(4.months.ago)], [(3.months.ago)..(2.months.ago)], [(1.month.ago)..(15.days.ago)] ] and a Post model with :created_at attribute. I want to find posts where created_at value is in this range, so the goal is to create a query like: SELECT * FROM posts WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2011-04-06' AND '2011-08-06' OR BETWEEN '2011-09-06' AND '2011-10-06' OR BETWEEN '2011-11-06' AND '2011-12-06' OR BETWEEN '2012-01-06' AND '2012-02-06' OR BETWEEN '2012-02-06' AND '2012-03-23'; If you have only one range like this: range = (12.months.ago)..(8.months.ago) we can do this query: Post.where(:created_at => range) and query should be: SELECT * FROM posts WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2011-04-06' AND '2011-08-06'; Is there a way to make this query using a notation like this Post.where(:created_at => range)? And what is the correct way to build this query? Thank you

    Read the article

  • Loop through multiple tables to execute same query

    - by pcvnes
    Hi, I have a database wherein per day a table is created to log process instances. The tables are labeled MESSAGE_LOG_YYYYMMDD Currently i want to sequentially execute the same QUERY against all those tables. I wrote the PL/SQL below, but got stuck at line 10. How can i execute the SQL statement against successfully against all tables here ? DECLARE CURSOR all_tables IS SELECT table_name FROM all_tables WHERE TABLE_NAME like 'MESSAGE_LOG_2%' ORDER BY TABLE_NAME ; BEGIN FOR msglog IN all_tables LOOP SELECT count(*) FROM TABLE msglog.TABLE_NAME ; END LOOP; END; / Cheers, Peter

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178  | Next Page >