Search Results

Search found 16682 results on 668 pages for 'search engines'.

Page 172/668 | < Previous Page | 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  | Next Page >

  • How to preserve object identity across different VMs

    - by wheleph
    To be specific let me illustrate the question with Spring http-remoting example. Suppose we have such implementation of a simple interface: public SearchServiceImpl implements SearchService { public SearchJdo processSearch(SearchJdo search) { search.name = "a funky name"; return search; } } SearchJdo is itself a simple POJO. Now when we call the method from a client through http-remoting we'll get: public class HTTPClient { public static void main(final String[] arguments) { final ApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext( "spring-http-client-config.xml"); final SearchService searchService = (SearchService) context.getBean("searchService"); SearchJdo search = new SearchJdo(); search.name = "myName"; // this method actually returns the same object it gets as an argument SearchJdo search2 = searchService.processSearch(search); System.out.println(search == search2); // prints "false" } } The problem is that the search objects are different because of serializaton although from logical prospective they are the same. The question is whether there are some technique that allows to support or emulate object identity across VMs.

    Read the article

  • A question mark within a @PathVariable in Spring MVC?

    - by sp00m
    Within the @Controller of a search engine: @RequestMapping(value = "/search/{query}", method = RequestMethod.GET) public String search(@PathVariable String query) {} If a user wants to search /search/w?rld (wich should match world, warld, whrld, etc.), the variable query equals w, because of the question mark which indicated a GET var. I tried "/search/{query:.+}", but still doesn't work. Any idea how to solve that problem?

    Read the article

  • Have there been attempts to make object containers that search for valid programs by auto wiring compatible components?

    - by Aaron Anodide
    I hope this post isn't too "Fringe" - I'm sure someone will just kill it if it is :) Three things made me want to reach out about this now: Decoupling is so in the forefront of design. TDD inspires the idea that it doesn't matter how a program comes to exist as long as it works. Seeing how often the adapter pattern is applied to achieve (1). I'm almost sure this has been tried from a memory of reading about it around the year 2000 or so. If I had to guess, it was maybe about and earlier version of the Java Spring framework. At this time we were not so far from days when the belief was that computer programs could exhibit useful emergent behavior. I think the article said it didn't work, but it didn't say it was impossible. I wonder if since then it has been deemed impossible or simply an illusion due to a false assumption of similarity between a brain and a CPU. I know this illusion existed because I had an internship in 1996 where I programmed neural nets that were supposedly going to exhibit "brain damage". STILL, after all that, I'm sitting around this morning and not able to shake the idea that it should be possible to have a method of programming to allow autonomous components to find each other, attempt to collaborate and their outputs evaluated against a set desired results.

    Read the article

  • Solr : how do i index and search several fields?

    - by sbrattla
    Hi, I've set up my first 'installation' of Solr, where each index (document) represents a musical work (with properties like number (int), title (string), version (string), composers (string) and keywords (string)). I've set the field 'title' as the default search field. However, what do I do when I would like to do a query on all fields? I'd like to give users the opportunity to search in all fields, and as far as I've understood there is at least two options for this: (1) Specify which fields the query should be made against. (2) Set up the Solr configuration with copyfields, so that values added to each of the fields will be copied to a 'catch-all'-like field which can be used for searching. However, in this case, i am uncertain how things would turn out when i take into consideration that the data types are not all the same for the various fields (the various fields will to a lesser og greater degree go through filters, but as copyfield values are taken from their original fields before the values have been run through their original fields' filters, i would have to apply one single filter to all values on the copyfield. This, again, would result in integers being 'filtered' just as strings would). Is this a case where i should use copyfields? At first glance, it seems a bit more 'flexible' to rather just search on all fields. However, maybe there's a cost? All feedback appreciated! Thanks!

    Read the article

  • SharePoint Search Problem: The crawler could not communicate with the server.

    - by Clara Oscura
    This one was not easy to solve ... Error: The crawler could not communicate with the server. Check that the server is available and that the firewall access is configured. Context: Some pages were not crawled (giving the above error) and, what is worse, all the sub content of that site was not crawled either! (the pages were the homepages of the site) Solution:The pages that could not be crawled due to this error contained a custom web part. This web part used default credentials for a given action. During crawling, the SP_Search account tried to perform this action but did not have the appropriate rights. This gave an error that stopped the crawling for the whole site. This blog helped me: http://patricklamber.blogspot.com/2010/04/why-might-moss-crawler-not-working.html

    Read the article

  • Lucene.Net: How can I add a date filter to my search results?

    - by rockinthesixstring
    I've got my searcher working really well, however it does tend to return results that are obsolete. My site is much like NerdDinner whereby events in the past become irrelevant. I'm currently indexing like this Public Function AddIndex(ByVal searchableEvent As [Event]) As Boolean Implements ILuceneService.AddIndex Dim writer As New IndexWriter(luceneDirectory, New StandardAnalyzer(), False) Dim doc As Document = New Document doc.Add(New Field("id", searchableEvent.ID, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED)) doc.Add(New Field("fullText", FullTextBuilder(searchableEvent), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)) doc.Add(New Field("user", If(searchableEvent.User.UserName = Nothing, "User" & searchableEvent.User.ID, searchableEvent.User.UserName), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)) doc.Add(New Field("title", searchableEvent.Title, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)) doc.Add(New Field("location", searchableEvent.Location.Name, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)) doc.Add(New Field("date", searchableEvent.EventDate, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED)) writer.AddDocument(doc) writer.Optimize() writer.Close() Return True End Function Notice how I have a "date" index that stores the event date. My search then looks like this ''# code omitted Dim reader As IndexReader = IndexReader.Open(luceneDirectory) Dim searcher As IndexSearcher = New IndexSearcher(reader) Dim parser As QueryParser = New QueryParser("fullText", New StandardAnalyzer()) Dim query As Query = parser.Parse(q.ToLower) ''# We're using 10,000 as the maximum number of results to return ''# because I have a feeling that we'll never reach that full amount ''# anyways. And if we do, who in their right mind is going to page ''# through all of the results? Dim topDocs As TopDocs = searcher.Search(query, Nothing, 10000) Dim doc As Document = Nothing ''# loop through the topDocs and grab the appropriate 10 results based ''# on the submitted page number While i <= last AndAlso i < topDocs.totalHits doc = searcher.Doc(topDocs.scoreDocs(i).doc) IDList.Add(doc.[Get]("id")) i += 1 End While ''# code omitted I did try the following, but it was to no avail (threw a NullReferenceException). While i <= last AndAlso i < topDocs.totalHits If Date.Parse(doc.[Get]("date")) >= Date.Today Then doc = searcher.Doc(topDocs.scoreDocs(i).doc) IDList.Add(doc.[Get]("id")) i += 1 End If End While I also found the following documentation, but I can't make heads or tails of it http://lucene.apache.org/java/1_4_3/api/org/apache/lucene/search/DateFilter.html

    Read the article

  • Tips For Choosing Best Search Engine Optimization Services For Your Company!

    With the profusion of companies offering SEO optimization services out there, it is therefore important that you know what to look out for in making a choice as to which company to choose. In making a choice you have to know the salient elements that make an ideal company that offers SEO optimization services, armed with this information you will be better equipped in making the right choice for your organization.

    Read the article

  • Wow, The Best Google Keyword Search Tools to Make More Sales and Money!

    Below, I will reveal the most effective software to target and identify the most profitable and frequently searched keywords in your Google AdWords campaign. Imagine You had 400 keywords that you were bidding on in your Google AdWords campaign. How do you identify which keyword delivers a sale and which keyword is just wasted capital on browsers?

    Read the article

  • SEO: Is promoting your backlinks a good strategy for improving search results for my site's name?

    - by user4394
    I run a website that's been around for about three years in the sports space. I am successfully ranking well for targeted keywords, but searching for the name of my site itself returns very poor results - it shows my site, its FB/Twitter, and then 15 pages of unrelated spam that happen to contain two words that, when combined, form my website's name. After that, my backlinks begin to show up spordically. As far as I can tell, I simply don't have enough backlinks and the backlinks I do have are ranked worse than the spam. (Site Explorer lists 200 external links to any page on our domain and 20 external links directly to the front page). To counter this, my strategy is to promote my backlinks so they get a better page rank than the spam. Does that make sense? Am I going in the right direction or should I just focus on getting more backlinks pointing directly to my site? Thanks in advance and I'd be happy to answer any questions I can (without giving away my site of course).

    Read the article

  • paging php error - undefined index

    - by fusion
    i've a search form with paging. when the user enters the keyword initially, it works fine and displays the required output; however, it also shows this error: Notice: Undefined index: page in C:\Users\user\Documents\Projects\Pro\search.php on line 21 Call Stack: 0.0011 372344 1. {main}() C:\Users\user\Documents\Projects\Pro\search.php:0 . .and if the user clicks on the 'next' page, it shows no output with this error thrown: Notice: Undefined index: q in C:\Users\user\Documents\Projects\Pro\search.php on line 19 Call Stack: 0.0016 372048 1. {main}() C:\Users\user\Documents\Projects\Pro\search.php:0 this is my code: <?php ini_set('display_errors',1); error_reporting(E_ALL|E_STRICT); include 'config.php'; $search_result = ""; $search_result = trim($_GET["q"]); $page= $_GET["page"]; //Get the page number to show if($page == "") $page=1; $search_result = mysql_real_escape_string($search_result); //Check if the string is empty if ($search_result == "") { echo "<p class='error'>Search Error. Please Enter Your Search Query.</p>" ; exit(); } if ($search_result == "%" || $search_result == "_" || $search_result == "+" ) { echo "<p class='error1'>Search Error. Please Enter a Valid Search Query.</p>" ; exit(); } if(!empty($search_result)) { // the table to search $table = "thquotes"; // explode search words into an array $arraySearch = explode(" ", $search_result); // table fields to search $arrayFields = array(0 => "cQuotes"); $countSearch = count($arraySearch); $a = 0; $b = 0; $query = "SELECT cQuotes, vAuthor, cArabic, vReference FROM ".$table." WHERE ("; $countFields = count($arrayFields); while ($a < $countFields) { while ($b < $countSearch) { $query = $query."$arrayFields[$a] LIKE '%$arraySearch[$b]%'"; $b++; if ($b < $countSearch) { $query = $query." AND "; } } $b = 0; $a++; if ($a < $countFields) { $query = $query.") OR ("; } } $query = $query.")"; $result = mysql_query($query, $conn) or die ('Error: '.mysql_error()); $totalrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if($totalrows < 1) { echo '<span class="error2">No matches found for "'.$search_result.'"</span>'; } else { $limit = 3; //Number of results per page $numpages=ceil($totalrows/$limit); $query = $query." ORDER BY idQuotes LIMIT " . ($page-1)*$limit . ",$limit"; $result = mysql_query($query, $conn) or die('Error:' .mysql_error()); ?> <div class="caption">Search Results</div> <div class="center_div"> <table> <?php while ($row= mysql_fetch_array($result, MYSQL_ASSOC)) { $cQuote = highlightWords(htmlspecialchars($row['cQuotes']), $search_result); ?> <tr> <td style="text-align:right; font-size:15px;"><?php h($row['cArabic']); ?></td> <td style="font-size:16px;"><?php echo $cQuote; ?></td> <td style="font-size:12px;"><?php h($row['vAuthor']); ?></td> <td style="font-size:12px; font-style:italic; text-align:right;"><?php h($row['vReference']); ?></td> </tr> <?php } ?> </table> </div> <?php //Create and print the Navigation bar $nav=""; if($page > 1) { $nav .= "<a href=\"search.php?page=" . ($page-1) . "&string=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\"><< Prev</a>"; } for($i = 1 ; $i <= $numpages ; $i++) { if($i == $page) { $nav .= "<B>$i</B>"; }else{ $nav .= "<a href=\"search.php?page=" . $i . "&string=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\">$i</a>"; } } if($page < $numpages) { $nav .= "<a href=\"search.php?page=" . ($page+1) . "&searchstring=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\">Next >></a>"; } echo "<br /><br />" . $nav; } } else { exit(); } ?>

    Read the article

  • Should we use <label> for every <input>?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Should we use <label> for every input? , even for submit button and keep hidden thorough css if we don't want to show label. or no need of label for submit button? .hide {display:none} <fieldset> <legend>Search</legend> <label for="Search">Search...</label> <input value="" id="Search" name="Search"> <label for="Submit" class="hide">Submit</label> <input type="submit" value="Go!" name="submit" id="submit"> </fieldset> or we should use like this (no label for submit) <fieldset> <legend>Search</legend> <label for="Search">Search...</label> <input value="" id="Search" name="Search"> <input type="submit" value="Go!" name="submit" > </fieldset>

    Read the article

  • In an AVL tree, at what condition the balancing is to be done? proper code in c languge

    - by bachchan
    Binary search follows Divide and Conquer method where as linear Search doesn't follw.The time complexity of Binary Search in O(log n) but incase of linear search the time complexity is O(n). Thats way Binary search is having bettr prior than linear search. But it is true when the list of items is large incase of smaller list linear is best(i.e.- it is only when the Best Case concern)

    Read the article

  • Form submission and hyperlinks using GET and POST

    - by Jon
    I have a search resource, the user can perform searches by filling out a form and submitting it, the create action is called, the Search is saved, the show action is called, and the results are displayed. This all happens with the default POST, and all works fine. The user may want to save his search in the saved_search table (i don't use the Search table for this purpose as this table stores all searches for the purpose of compiling statistics, and gets cleared on a regular basis). Once the Search is saved, it can be re-run by clicking a hyperlink, this is where i start to get problems. I see no way of getting my hyperlink to run the create action of Search, with a POST request, and the necessary data. I then decided to try to get both form submission and the hyperlink to perform a search using a GET request, i was unable to get form_for to run my Search create action using a GET request, it always seems to get routed to my index action. Can someone suggest a good restful solution to this problem please. Many thanks

    Read the article

  • Effective Website Search Engine Optimization - What Does That Mean?

    The Internet has become a very busy place. It's also become a sort of global marketplace where people all over the world come to buy and sell goods. Not much new to anyone in that statement, but it does beg the question, what's the best way for you to find customers both locally to Saskatoon and globally... and let them know you're online?

    Read the article

  • Search Marketing Agency - Cost Efficient Way to Promote Your Business!

    These days, it's the demand for the Internet that is exactly going too high. Over the years, the Internet has managed to establish itself as the most effective marketing platform for many businesses. On the other hand people across the globe now prefer to opt for the Internet in order to grab their necessary details or information easily.

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Optimization PR - Is it Buzz Worthy Or Over Hyped?

    Public Relations (PR) is a business practice that plays a pivotal role in defining a business' relationship with its employees, customers, and shareholders. Good PR strengthens brands and builds the public's trust in it - the primary reason most businesses have PR professionals to take care of public communications such as conferences, press releases, social media engagement, crisis communication, and media and employee communications.

    Read the article

  • Small Business SEO For Regular People - What Makes a Good Target Search Key Phrase to Rank For

    If you run a small business and have a web site you may think that all this stuff about rankings and SEO does not apply to you. The reality is that everyone who has a web site and would like traffic to that site needs to know the basics or else it's a bit like opening a fast food joint in the middle of a desert. You may well have the best-looking site, but if no one manages to find you, unless specifically directed to the location, then it's a complete waste.

    Read the article

  • What Makes an Effective Search Engine Optimization Marketing Campaign?

    In the recent years, the Internet has increasingly become popular as a marketing tool. More so, it even gives traditional marketing and advertising channels a run for their money because of its ability to attract millions of customers. This fact can be attributed to the growing number of Internet users around the world who look for information online.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  | Next Page >