Search Results

Search found 18361 results on 735 pages for 'hibernate search'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 173/735 | < Previous Page | 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180  | Next Page >

  • Table per subclass inheritance relationship: How to query against the Parent class without loading a

    - by Arthur Ronald F D Garcia
    Suppose a Table per subclass inheritance relationship which can be described bellow (From wikibooks.org - see here) Notice Parent class is not abstract @Entity @Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.JOINED) public class Project { @Id private long id; // Other properties } @Entity @Table(name="LARGEPROJECT") public class LargeProject extends Project { private BigDecimal budget; } @Entity @Table(name="SMALLPROJECT") public class SmallProject extends Project { } I have a scenario where i just need to retrieve the Parent class. Because of performance issues, What should i do to run a HQL query in order to retrieve the Parent class and just the Parent class without loading any subclass ???

    Read the article

  • How to generate entities with Objects?

    - by 01
    I want to generate @Enities with seam-gen from existing database. However its generates very simple version only. For Example @Entity @Table(name = "badges") public class Badges implements java.io.Serializable { private Integer id; private **Integer userId**; private String name; private String date; I want him to generate @Entity @Table(name = "badges") public class Badges implements java.io.Serializable { private Integer id; private **User user**; private String name; private String date; I even have constrain on userId and it points to column User.id P.S. Im using MySQL5 and seam gen is using hbm2java to generate entities.

    Read the article

  • Converting SQL with subselect in select to HQL

    - by UltraVi01
    I have the following SQL that I am having problems converting to HQL. A NPE is getting thrown -- which I think has something to do with the SUM function. Also, I'd like to sort on the subselect alias -- is this possible? SQL (subselect): SELECT q.title, q.author_id, (SELECT IFNULL(SUM(IF(vote_up=true,1,-1)), 0) FROM vote WHERE question_id = q.id) AS votecount FROM question q ORDER BY votecount DESC HQL (not working) SELECT q, (SELECT COALESCE(SUM(IF(v.voteUp=true,1,-1)), 0) FROM Vote v WHERE v.question = q) AS votecount FROM Question AS q LEFT JOIN q.author u LEFT JOIN u.blockedUsers ub WHERE q.dateCreated BETWEEN :week AND :now AND u.id NOT IN ( SELECT ub.blocked FROM UserBlock AS ub WHERE ub.blocker =:loggedInUser ) AND (u.blockedUsers IS EMPTY OR ub.blocked !=:loggedInUser) ORDER BY votecount DESC

    Read the article

  • one-to-many with criteria question

    - by brnzn
    enter code hereI want to apply restrictions on the list of items, so only items from a given dates will be retrieved. Here are my mappings: <class name="MyClass" table="MyTable" mutable="false" > <cache usage="read-only"/> <id name="myId" column="myId" type="integer"/> <property name="myProp" type="string" column="prop"/> <list name="items" inverse="true" cascade="none"> <key column="myId"/> <list-index column="itemVersion"/> <one-to-many class="Item"/> </list> </class> <class name="Item" table="Items" mutable="false" > <cache usage="read-only"/> <id name="myId" column="myId" type="integer"/> <property name="itemVersion" type="string" column="version"/> <property name="startDate" type="date" column="startDate"/> </class> I tried this code: Criteria crit = session.createCriteria(MyClass.class); crit.add( Restrictions.eq("myId", new Integer(1))); crit = crit.createCriteria("items").add( Restrictions.le("startDate", new Date()) ); which result the following quires: select ... from MyTable this_ inner join Items items1_ on this_.myId=items1_.myId where this_.myId=? and items1_.startDate<=? followed by select ... from Items items0_ where items0_.myId=? But what I need is something like: select ... from MyTable this_ where this_.myId=? followed by select ... from Items items0_ where items0_.myId=? and items0_.startDate<=? Any idea how I can apply a criteria on the list of items?

    Read the article

  • Issue with a JPA query

    - by boyd4715
    I am trying to execute the following JPA query: public static final String UPDATE_INVENTORY_CUSTOMER_FOR_AMS_MAPPING = "UPDATE Inventory inventory SET" + " inventory.customer.id = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_CUSTOMER_ID + " ,inventory.lastUpdateUserId = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_USER_ID + " where inventory.amsConsignorName = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_AMS_CONSIGNOR_NAME + " and inventory.amsConsignorOrgCd = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_AMS_CONSIGNOR_ORG_CD + " and inventory.amsConsignorTypeName = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_AMS_CONSIGNOR_TYPE + " and inventory.status.code in (:" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_STATUS + ")"; but it is seeing the following: update ATL_INVENTORY, set CONSIGNOR_ID=?, LAST_UPDATE_USER_ID=? where AMS_CONSIGNOR_NAME=? and AMS_CONSIGNOR_ORG_CD=? and AMS_CONSIGNOR_TYPE_NAME=? and (CODE in (? , ? , ? , ?)) Any ideal as to why there is a comma after the table name?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible for a Grails Domain to have no 'id'?

    - by firnnauriel
    Is it possible to create a table that has no 'id'? For example, this is my domain: class SnbrActVector { int nid String term double weight static mapping = { version false id generator: 'identity' } static constraints = { } } When I run this SQL statement, it fails: insert into snbr_act_vector values (5, 'term', 0.5) I checked the table and 'id' is already set to autoincrement. I'm thinking that another option is to remove the 'id' itself. Or is there another workaround for this? Please assume that it is not an option to change the givent SQL statement.

    Read the article

  • What's the reason behind the jumping GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.TABLE) when not specifyi

    - by joeduardo
    Why do I need to add allocationSize=1 when using the @TableGenerator to ensure that the id wouldn't jump from 1, 2,... to 32,xxx, 65,xxx,... after a jvm restart? Is there a design reason for the need to specify the allocationSize? This snippet would produce the jumping ids @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE) private Long id; Here's the modified snippet that produces the properly sequenced ids @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE, generator = "account_generator") @TableGenerator(name = "account_generator", initialValue = 1, allocationSize = 1) private Long id;

    Read the article

  • How do I specify the foreign key on a many-to-one relationship when is not a property on the object

    - by jjujuma
    I'm trying to map a many-to-one relationship from MarketMenuBranch to Market. My classes look like: public class Market implements Serializable { private int id; private String name; private List<MarketMenuBranch> marketMenuBranches; // accessors / mutators etc... public class MarketMenuBranch implements Serializable { private MarketMenuBranchId id; private String name; // accessors / mutators etc... public class MarketMenuBranchId implements Serializable { private int marketId; private int sequence; // accessors / mutators etc... But I don't know what I can put for the property name (where I have ???? below). I really want to put id.marketId but that seems to be wrong. <class name="MarketMenuBranch" table="MARKET_MENU_BRANCH"> <composite-id name="id" class="MarketMenuBranchId"> <key-property name="marketId"/> <key-property name="sequence"/> </composite-id> <property name="name"/> <many-to-one name="????????"/> </class> How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • How can you remove a Criterion from a criteria?

    - by ChuckM
    Hello, For instance if I do something like: Criteria c = session.createCriteria(Book.class) .add(Expression.ge("release",reDate); .add(Expression.ge("price",price); .addOrder( Order.asc("date") ) .setFirstResult(0) .setMaxResults(10); c.list(); How can I use the same criteria instance, but remove (for example) the second criterion? I'm trying to build a dynamic query in which I'd like to let the user remove a filter, without the backend having to reconstruct the criteria from scratch. Thank you

    Read the article

  • How to implement a search page which shows results on the same page?

    - by Andrew
    I'm using ASP.NET MVC 2 for the first time on a project at work and am feeling like a bit of a noob. I have a page with a customer search control/partial view. The control is a textbox and a button. You enter a customer id into the textbox and hit search. The page then "refreshes" and shows the customer details on the same page. In other words, the customer details appear below the customer search control. This is so that if the customer isn't the right one, the user can search again without hitting back in the browser. Or, perhaps they mistyped the customer id and need to try again. I want the URL to look like this: /Customer/Search/1 Obviously, this follows the default route in the project. Now, if I type the URL above directly into my browser, it works fine. However, when I then use the search control on that page to search for say customer 2, the page refreshes with the correct customer details but the URL does not change! It stays as /Customer/Search/1 When I want it to be /Customer/Search/2 How can I get it to change to the correct URL? I am only using the default route in Global.asax. My Search method looks like this: <AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Get)> _ Function Search(ByVal id As String) As ActionResult Dim customer As Customer = New CustomerRepository().GetById(id) Return View("SearchResult", customer) End Function

    Read the article

  • iPad search bar bad memory access?

    - by Geoff Baum
    Hello all, So I am trying to implement a search bar in my app and am very close but can't seem to figure out where this memory error is occurring. This is what part of my search method looks like: filters = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; NSString *searchText = detailSearch.text; NSMutableArray *searchArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; // Normally holds the object (ex: 70 locations) searchArray = self.copyOfFilters ; //This is the line that is breaking after ~2-3 letters are entered in the search for (NSString *sTemp in searchArray) { NSRange titleResultsRange = [sTemp rangeOfString:searchText options:NSCaseInsensitiveSearch]; if (titleResultsRange.length > 0) [filters addObject:sTemp]; } displayedFilters = filters; copyOfFilters is a deep copy of the displayed filters that appear when the view first loads via: self.copyOfFilters = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithArray:displayedFilters copyItems:YES]; I have traced through the entry of letters and it is accurate after 2 letters, but once you try and enter a letter after a space in the search bar, it crashes. The value of copyOfFilters = {(int)[$VAR count]} objects. Does anyone know what may be causing this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • problem in deleting record

    - by akshay
    I have a entity manager em1 .em1 starts a transcation tx on db1 table1.Now inside tx i call a API getdata().This API creastes a new entitymanger em2 and return 1 record.Now if entity manger em1 tries to delete the record returned by em1 , it hangs.Code times out.Is the record locked by em1.How can ii solve this problem? create em1 //em1 start transcation tx1 tx1.start Object r = getData(); em1 tried to delete r //code hangs here tx1.commit Object getData(){ create em2 return data found using em2 }

    Read the article

  • grails: quering in a composite structure

    - by Asaf David
    hey i have the following domain model: class Location { String name static hasMany = [locations:Location, persons:Person] } class Person { String name } so basically each location can hold a bunch of people + "sub-locations". what is the best way to recursively query for all persons under a location (including it's sub locations, and their sub locations, etc')?

    Read the article

  • Why is it possible to save entity but not delete if transactional annotation is set to readonly=true

    - by jakob
    Hello experts! My class is annotated with org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional like this: @Transactional(readOnly = true) public class MyClass { I then have a dao class: @Override public void delete(final E entity) { getSession().delete(entity); } @Override public void save(final E entity) { getSession().saveOrUpdate(entity); } Then I have two methods in MyClass @Transactional(readOnly = false) public void doDelete(Entity entity){ daoImpl.delete(entity) } //@Transactional(readOnly = false) public void doSave(){ daoImpl.save(entity) } Saving and deleting works like a charm. But if I remove the @Transactional(readOnly = false) on doDelete method deletion stops working, Saving works with and without the method annotation. So my question is: WHY?

    Read the article

  • Grails automatic constraint update

    - by Prakash
    Does grails have an automatic constraint update. If we change the field in domain class to be nullable by adding constraint, it is not getting reflected in database without schema export. Is it possible to do get grails do this update automatically.

    Read the article

  • Sequence Number in testing Spring application with JUnit (Hibernating, Spring MVC)

    - by MBK
    I am testing DAO in Spring Application. @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) @ContextConfiguration(locations = "classpath:/applicationContext.xml") @TransactionConfiguration(transactionManager = "transactionManager", defaultRollback = true) @Transactional public class CommentDAOImplTest { @Autowired //testing mehods here} The tests are running good. Iam able to add an comment and I also have a defaultRollback property set. So, the added comment will be deleted automatically. happy!..Now the problem is with the sequence number for mcomment. Can I, in any way rollback the seq number? any suggestins on that. I dont want to mess up the sequrnce number. Business requires comment Id to be showed. (I still dont know why). I know in memory db is an option....but I am guessing defaultRollback purpose is to eliminate in memory db testing and mocking. (Just my opinion.)

    Read the article

  • Strange lazy load problem

    - by JooLio
    public class QuickQuoteTemplate { ... public virtual IList<QuickQuoteTemplateItem> InnerItems { get; set; } ... } public class QuickQuoteTemplateItem { ... public virtual IList<QuickQuoteTemplateItem> InnerItems { get; set; } ... } <class name="QuickQuoteTemplate" table="SA_QUICK_QUOTE_TEMPLATE"> ... <bag name="InnerItems" lazy="false" inverse="true" cascade="delete" > <key column="PARENT_QQ_TEMPLATE_ID" ></key> <one-to-many class="QuickQuoteTemplateItem" /> </bag> ... </class> <class name="QuickQuoteTemplateItem" table="SA_QUICK_QUOTE_TEMPLATE_ITEMS"> ... <bag name="InnerItems" lazy="false" inverse="false" cascade="delete"> <key column="PARENT_ITEM_ID" /> <one-to-many class="QuickQuoteTemplateItem" /> </bag> ... </class> InnerItems collections is set as no lazy, but after disposing the ISession instance, quickQuote.InnerItems is crying "failed to lazily initialize a collection, no session or session was closed". I've even tried to call InnerItems before the session is closed by myself. It successfully retrieves, but after disposing of the session it becomes not initialized.

    Read the article

  • Automatically Persisting a Complex Java Object

    - by VeeArr
    For a project I am working on, I need to persist a number of POJOs to a database. The POJOs class definitions are sometimes highly nested, but they should flatten okay, as the nesting is tree-like and contains no cycles (and the base elements are eventually primitives/Strings). It is preferred that the solution used create one table per data type and that the tables will have one field per primitive member in the POJO. Subclassing and similar problems are not issues for this particular project. Does anybody know of any existing solutions that can: Automatically generate a CREATE TABLE definition from the class definition Automatically generate a query to persist an object to the database, given an instance of the object Automatically generate a query to retrieve an object from the database and return it as a POJO, given a key. Solutions that can do this with minimum modifications/annotions to the class files and minimum external configuration are preferred. Example: Java classes //Class to be persisted class TypeA { String guid; long timestamp; TypeB data1; TypeC data2; } class TypeB { int id; int someData; } class TypeC { int id; int otherData; } Could map to CREATE TABLE TypeA ( guid CHAR(255), timestamp BIGINT, data1_id INT, data1_someData INT, data2_id INt, data2_otherData INT ); Or something similar.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180  | Next Page >