Search Results

Search found 40226 results on 1610 pages for 'object relational model'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 178/1610 | < Previous Page | 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185  | Next Page >

  • accepts_nested_attributes with Model.update for multiple models

    - by Ohad
    Hi, I'm trying to follow http://railscasts.com/episodes/198-edit-multiple-individually but I would like to save objects which are nested (accepts_nested_attributes_for). I've added the following in my controller: def edit_multiple @people = Person.find(params[:person_ids], :include => [:parameters]) end def update_multiple keys = params[:people].keys if keys.empty? flash[:error] = "Please select at least one person" redirect_to :back and return end values = keys.map {|k| params[:people][k]} @people = Person.update(keys,values).reject { |h| h.errors.empty? } if @people.empty? flash[:notice] = 'Updated people!' redirect_to person_path else redirect_to edit_multiple_path end end and in the view: <% form_tag update_multiple_people_path, :method => :post do %> <% for person in @people %> <% fields_for "people[]", host do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages :object_name => "person" %> <h3><%= h person.name %></h3> <% for parameter in person.parameters %> <% f.fields_for "person_parameters[]", parameter do |builder| -%> <%= render "common/parameters", :f => builder %> <% end -%> <% end -%> <p><%= link_to_add_fields "Add a parameter", f, :person_parameters, "common/parameters" %></p> <% end %> <% end %> <p><%= submit_tag "Edit these Parameter(s)" %></p> <% end %> but I'm always getting a mistmatch - e.g. ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch and Parameter(#70341811965140) expected, got Array(#70341874300460) Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Using attr_accessible in a join model with has_many :through relationship

    - by Paulo Oliveira
    I have a USER that creates a COMPANY and become an EMPLOYEE in the process. The employees table has an :user_id and a :company_id. class User has_many :employees has_many :companies, :through => :employees class Employee belongs_to :user belongs_to :company attr_accessible :active class Company has_many :employees has_many :users, :through => employees Pretty basic. But here's the thing, the resource EMPLOYEE has other attributes than its foreign keys, like the boolean :active. I would like to use attr_accessible, but this causes some problems. The attribute :user_id is set right, but :company_id is nil. @user.companies << Company.new(...) Employee id:1 user_id:1 company_id:nil So my question is: if :user_id is set right, despite it is not an attr_accessible, why :company_id isn't set right just the same? It shouldn't be an attr_accessible. I'm using Rails 3.0.8, and have also tested with 3.0.7.

    Read the article

  • rails semi-complex STI with ancestry data model planning the routes and controllers

    - by ere
    I'm trying to figure out the best way to manage my controller(s) and models for a particular use case. I'm building a review system where a User may build a review of several distinct types with a Polymorphic Reviewable. Country (has_many reviews & cities) Subdivision/State (optional, sometimes it doesnt exist, also reviewable, has_many cities) City (has places & review) Burrow (optional, also reviewable ex: Brooklyn) Neighborhood (optional & reviewable, ex: williamsburg) Place (belongs to city) I'm also wondering about adding more complexity. I also want to include subdivisions occasionally... ie for the US, I might add Texas or for Germany, Baveria and have it be reviewable as well but not every country has regions and even those that do might never be reviewed. So it's not at all strict. I would like it to as simple and flexible as possible. It'd kinda be nice if the user could just land on one form and select either a city or a country, and then drill down using data from say Foursquare to find a particular place in a city and make a review. I'm really not sure which route I should take? For example, what happens if I have a Country, and a City... and then I decide to add a Burrow? Could I give places tags (ie Williamsburg, Brooklyn) belong_to NY City and the tags belong to NY? Tags are more flexible and optionally explain what areas they might be in, the tags belong to a city, but also have places and be reviewable? So I'm looking for suggestions for anyone who's done something related. Using Rails 3.2, and mongoid.

    Read the article

  • In an extension method how do a create an object based on the implementation class

    - by Greg
    Hi, In an extension method how do a create an object based on the implementation class. So in the code below I wanted to add an "AddRelationship" extension method, however I'm not sure how within the extension method I can create an Relationship object? i.e. don't want to tie the extension method to this particular implementation of relationship public static class TopologyExtns { public static void AddNode<T>(this ITopology<T> topIf, INode<T> node) { topIf.Nodes.Add(node.Key, node); } public static INode<T> FindNode<T>(this ITopology<T> topIf, T searchKey) { return topIf.Nodes[searchKey]; } public static bool AddRelationship<T>(this ITopology<T> topIf, INode<T> parentNode, INode<T> childNode) { var rel = new RelationshipImp(); // ** How do I create an object from teh implementation // Add nodes to Relationship // Add relationships to Nodes } } public interface ITopology<T> { //List<INode> Nodes { get; set; } Dictionary<T, INode<T> > Nodes { get; set; } } public interface INode<T> { // Properties List<IRelationship<T>> Relationships { get; set; } T Key { get; } } public interface IRelationship<T> { // Parameters INode<T> Parent { get; set; } INode<T> Child { get; set; } } namespace TopologyLibrary_Client { class RelationshipsImp : IRelationship<string> { public INode<string> Parent { get; set; } public INode<string> Child { get; set; } } } public class TopologyImp<T> : ITopology<T> { public Dictionary<T, INode<T>> Nodes { get; set; } public TopologyImp() { Nodes = new Dictionary<T, INode<T>>(); } } thanks

    Read the article

  • which iphone data model to choose?

    - by Tronic
    i need to get some data somewhere to put in a timeline. the data strcture is like this: - Item - Name - Year - ShortInfo (mainly keywords and short texts) - LongInfo (much text with videos/audios (urls) a friend of mine told me i should you a plist and get all that stuff in there, but what about a sqlite database? any advice? regards

    Read the article

  • Ruby is already using the class name of my model

    - by Octopus Inc
    I'm making a forum application with various levels of authorization, one of which is a Monitor. I am doing this by extending my User class, and I plan on fine tuning this with "-ship" classes (e.g. administratorship, authorship, moderatorship, etc.). Apparently the Monitor class is part of ruby mixin. How do I keep my resource name without the collisions?

    Read the article

  • Reverting CoreData data

    - by ndg
    I have an NSTableView which is populated via a CoreData-backed NSArrayController. Users are able to edit any field they choose within the NSTableView. When they select the rows that they have modified and press a button, the data is sent to a third-party webservice. Provided the webservice accepts the updated values, I want to commit those values to my persistent store. If, however, the webservice returns an error (or simply fails to return), I want the edited fields to revert to their original values. To complicate matters, I have a number of other editable controls, backed by CoreData, which do not need to resort to this behaviour. I believe the solution to this problem revolves around the creation of a secondary Managed Object context, which I would use only for values edited within that particularly NSTableView. But I'm confused as to how the two MOC would interact with each other. What's the best solution to this problem?

    Read the article

  • My object becomes NSCFArray when running on iPhone

    - by cagreen
    I'm really scratching my head on this one: I have an object (MyObject) which I instantiate, and this object has an NSArray member variable. The following simple code working in the sim: MyObject *myObj = [[MyObject alloc] init]; NSArray *arr = [myObj myMemberArray]; When I hover over myObj in XCode the tooltip reads "MyObject". Good! But when I debug it on the device (OS 3.1.3) I get: "[NSCFArray myMemberArray]: unrecognized selector sent to instance ... " When I hover over myObj, sure enough it reads "NSCFArray". Can anyone give me some pointers on where to go next with this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Using multiple SWF Object - Flash doesn't focus on rollover

    - by WiseDonkey
    I've got a page with multiple embeds of Flash objects, including dynamically created graphs. I'm including them all with SWF Object JS declared in the header. It works fine in the fact that all are loaded. But, for some reason when you move down on the page (so they're out of view) and back, or click on another object it no longer has focus when you're rolling over. I.e. I have a flash menu that moves on rollover. When you go down the page, click on something, then go back up it no longer response to rollover. I've seen bits on here and elsewhere about losing focus in Firefox (which is the browser Im using - i havent managed to find this bug in IE) but it's talking about literally not being able to type or whatever, when you click on it. This is on rollover. Has anyone got any advice or thoughts on this subject?

    Read the article

  • retrieving object information with Doctrine

    - by ajsie
    i want to fetch information from the database using objects. i really like this approach cause this is more OOP: $user = Doctrine_Core::getTable('User')->find(1); echo $user->Email['address']; echo $user->Phonenumbers[0]->phonenumber; rather than: $q = Doctrine_Query::create() ->from('User u') ->leftJoin('u.Email e') ->leftJoin('u.Phonenumbers p') ->where('u.id = ?', 1); $user = $q->fetchOne(); echo $user->Email['address']; echo $user->Phonenumbers[0]['phonenumber']; the problem is that the first one uses 3 queries (3 different tables), while the second one uses only 1 (and is therefore recommended technique). but i feel that it destroys the object oriented design. cause ORM is meant to give us an OOP approach so that we could focus on objects and not the relational database. but now they want us to go back to use SQL like pattern. there isn't a way to get information form multiple tables not using DQL? the above examples are taken from the documentation: doctrine

    Read the article

  • How to run Jquery constructor from own function?

    - by Invidian
    I need to create a function which will returning jQuery.Color object and i have no idea how to do it. Here is code example function newcolor () { var obj = new $.Color( 'rgb(0,0,0)' ); return obj;} var foo = newcolor(); foo.red(); Edit: My full code: function my (element,a,b,c){ //class my this.target = $(elem); this.new_color = function (a,b,c) { return new $.Color( 'rgb('+a+','+b+','+c+')'); } this.base_color = new_color (a,b,c); this.colorize = function () ( this.target.css({ background-color: new_color }); } var div = new My($('foo'),0,0,0); div.new_color(255,255,255); div.colorize(); My goal is to create class which can hold jquery element and operate on it. Now I'm stuck on returning $.Color().

    Read the article

  • Retreive value from model into view ib MVC 3

    - by prerna
    public class HomeController : Controller { public ActionResult Index() { return View(); } /* public string Browse() { return "Hello from Browse"; public string Details(int id) { string message = "Store.Details, ID = " + id; return message; // return "Hello from Details"; }*/ public ActionResult Details(int id) { var album = new Album { Title = "Album " + id }; return View(album); } } I am new to MVC 3 ,My View is Details.aspx without Razor engine. <html> <head runat="server"> <title>Details</title> </head> <body> <div> </div> </body> </html> Can anyone help

    Read the article

  • What SQL is being sent from a SqlCommand object

    - by Justin808
    I have a SqlCommand object on my c# based asp.net page. The SQL and the passed parameters are working the majority of the time. I have one case that is not working, I get the following error: String or binary data would be truncated. The statement has been terminated. I understand the error and but all the columns in the database should be long enough to hold everything being sent. My questions, Is there a way to see what the actual SQL being sent to the database is from SqlCommand object? I would like to be able to email the SQL when an error occurs. Thanks, Justin

    Read the article

  • Strange behavior: Dynamic expressions with RegExp Object in RegExp.match (Javascript)

    - by NeDark
    I have detect a strange behavior in regexps created with the RegExp object: With this code: var exp1 = /./; var exp2 = new RegExp('.'); ? var test1 = exp1.test('large\n\ntext..etc.'); var test2 = exp2.test('large\n\ntext..etc.'); ? var match1 = 'large\n\ntext..etc.'.match(exp1); var match2 = 'large\n\ntext..etc.'.match(exp2); ...the result is: test1 = true test2 = true ? match1 = 'l' (first match) match2 = null With the regexp maked with the regexp object from a string it finds nothing... Why does this happends? Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • PHP object parent/child recursion

    - by Damien
    I've got a parent-child OO relationship. Parent obejcts has many child objects and every child object knows about it's parent by reference. The parent can be a child too (basically its a tree). When i do a var_dump() on the root object it says ["parent"]=RECURSION many times and the generated description will be really long. I'm wondering if i do something wrong. If yes, i'm interested in the "best practice". Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • How to access a plugin model from a regular controller in PHP Cake 1.1

    - by Duncan
    Hopefully a simple question: I've a plugin which uses a set of tables (kb_items, kb_item_tags, etc). and I'd like to be able to access these models from another controller (say, my Pages controller), thus: class PagesController extends AppController{ function knowledgebase(){ $items = $this->KbItem->findAll(...); } } I am admittedly breaking the rules a little (by not placing this controller inside the knowledge base plugin), but this in this case its a custom page that doesn't need to be part of the knowledge base plugin code base. Please let me know if you need more details. Thanks in advance for any help!

    Read the article

  • Method hiding with interfaces

    - by fearofawhackplanet
    interface IFoo { int MyReadOnlyVar { get; } } class Foo : IFoo { int MyReadOnlyVar { get; set; } } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo { MyReadOnlyVar = 1 }; } Is the above an acceptable way of implementing a readonly/immutable object? The immutability of IFoo can be broken with a temporary cast to Foo. In general (non-critical) cases, is hiding functionality through interfaces a common pattern? Or is it considered lazy coding? Or even an anti-pattern?

    Read the article

  • Delphi> Please explain this: type... procedure of object

    - by Richard Woolf
    I've encountered some code that's new to me... I've never really seen a type declaration of a procedure of object, and I just don't see the point. Why couldn't the developer simply keep a field of type Boolean? interface type TFinishedCaptureEvent = procedure(AFinished: Boolean) of object; TFrameCard = class(TFrame) ... private FOnFinishedCapture: TFinishedCaptureEvent; public property OnFinishedCapture: TFinishedCaptureEvent read FOnFinishedCapture write FOnFinishedCapture; end; implementation ... if Assigned(FOnFinishedCapture) then FOnFinishedCapture(False);

    Read the article

  • UITableView setting standalone delegate object?

    - by fuzzygoat
    Hi have setup a sample application using a UITableView. Initially I did this by conforming my controller to and , added a tableView in IB and connected "datasource" & "delegate" to Files Owner. It all works so thats good. What I have been trying out is creating my own class for the delegate. I created a new class and added and , but quickly found I could not connect the tableViewdataSource / delegate. To solve this I added an "Object" (NSObject) in IB and set it to my new class. I then connected the dataSource and delegate outlets to this object. It sort of works, the app runs and displays the tableView, but when I try and scroll the table the app crashes. Can I ask if I am going about this the right way? gary

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185  | Next Page >