Search Results

Search found 5123 results on 205 pages for 'functional dependencies'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 18/205 | < Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >

  • what is the purpose of arrows?

    - by Simon
    I am learning functionnal programming with Haskell, and I try to grab concepts by first understanding why do I need them. I would like to know the goal of arrows in functional programming languages. What problem do they solve? I checked http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Understanding_arrows and http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~rjmh/afp-arrows.pdf. All I understand is that they are used to describe graphs for computations, and that they allow easier point free style coding. The article assume that point free style is generally easier to understand and to write. This seems quite subjective to me. In another article (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/StephensArrowTutorial#Hangman:_Main_program), a hangman game is implemented, but I cannot see how arrows makes this implementation natural. I could find a lot of papers describing the concept, but nothing about the motivation. What I am missing?

    Read the article

  • linux nooB: Installing ffmpeg + dependencies on aws linux ami (repo issues)

    - by HdN8
    Im installing ffmpeg to run on an amazon linux ami, and have added the rpmforge repo and the dag repo. Here are some guidelines I'm using for reference: TWoZaO and Razuna The rpmforge repo has ffmpeg, but if you try to install it then it will complain that is missing dependencies (for me libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit)). Regardless I will install ffmpeg from svn so I can be sure to enable the options I want (namely libx264). It seems strange to me though that SDL is not in rpmforge or dag, and in according to both of my references above, it should be there. I tried to grab it manually from here, but it needs these dependencies, so no-go: error: Failed dependencies: SDL = 1.2.10-8.el5 is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 alsa-lib-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libGL-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libGLU-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libX11-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libXext-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libXrandr-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libXrender-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 libXt-devel is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 Any advice for a linux nooB lost in a mess of repos and dependency errors?

    Read the article

  • Installing ffmpeg + dependencies on AWS Linux AMI (repo issues)

    - by HdN8
    I'm installing ffmpeg to run on an Amazon linux AMI, and have added the rpmforge repo and the dag repo. Here are some guidelines I'm using for reference: TWoZaO and Razuna The rpmforge repo has ffmpeg, but if you try to install it then it will complain that is missing dependencies (for me libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit)). Regardless I will install ffmpeg from svn so I can be sure to enable the options I want (namelylibx264). It seems strange to me though that SDL is not inrpmforgeordag`, and in according to both of my references above, it should be there. I tried to grab it manually from here, but it needs these dependencies, so no-go: > error: Failed dependencies: SDL = > 1.2.10-8.el5 is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > alsa-lib-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libGL-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libGLU-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libX11-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXext-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXrandr-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXrender-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXt-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64

    Read the article

  • Dependencies problems installing openjdk on Ubuntu

    - by Rodnower
    I try to install openjdk-7-jre: sudo apt-get install openjdk-7-jre But I have dependencies problems: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: openjdk-7-jre : Depends: openjdk-7-jre-headless (= 7u7-2.3.2a-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgif4 (>= 4.1.4) but it is not installable Depends: libatk-wrapper-java-jni (>= 0.30.4-0ubuntu2) but it is not installable Recommends: libgnome2-0 but it is not installable Recommends: libgnomevfs2-0 but it is not going to be installed Recommends: ttf-dejavu-extra but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. This is version of Ubuntu: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS I completely don't know how resolve dependencies... Some one can help me? Thank you for ahead.

    Read the article

  • Installing ffmpeg + dependencies on AWS Linux AMI (repo issues)

    - by HdN8
    I'm installing ffmpeg to run on an Amazon linux AMI, and have added the rpmforge repo and the dag repo. Here are some guidelines I'm using for reference: TWoZaO and Razuna The rpmforge repo has ffmpeg, but if you try to install it then it will complain that is missing dependencies (for me libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit)). Regardless I will install ffmpeg from svn so I can be sure to enable the options I want (namelylibx264). It seems strange to me though that SDL is not inrpmforgeordag`, and in according to both of my references above, it should be there. I tried to grab it manually from here, but it needs these dependencies, so no-go: > error: Failed dependencies: SDL = > 1.2.10-8.el5 is needed by SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > alsa-lib-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libGL-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libGLU-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libX11-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXext-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXrandr-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXrender-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64 > libXt-devel is needed by > SDL-devel-1.2.10-8.el5.x86_64

    Read the article

  • Time/resource allocation on a Stylish vs. Functional user interface

    - by jasonk
    When developing applications how much focus/time do you place on an application’s style vs. functionality. Battleship gray apps drive me insane. On the other hand maximizing a business application’s "style" can tax time and financial resources. Applications need to be appealing to resell or meet basic customer expectations, but defining a healthy medium can be difficult. What would you say are reasonable "standards" for allocating develop time/resources should be dedicated to stylizing a business application?

    Read the article

  • Can someone clarify what this Joel On Software quote means?

    - by Bob
    I was reading Joel On Software today and ran across this quote: Without understanding functional programming, you can't invent MapReduce, the algorithm that makes Google so massively scalable. The terms Map and Reduce come from Lisp and functional programming. MapReduce is, in retrospect, obvious to anyone who remembers from their 6.001-equivalent programming class that purely functional programs have no side effects and are thus trivially parallelizable. What does he mean when he says functional programs have no side effects? And how does this make parallelizing trivial?

    Read the article

  • What is the advantage of currying?

    - by Mad Scientist
    I just learned about currying, and while I think I understand the concept, I'm not seeing any big advantage in using it. As a trivial example I use a function that adds two values (written in ML). The version without currying would be fun add(x, y) = x + y and would be called as add(3, 5) while the curried version is fun add x y = x + y (* short for val add = fn x => fn y=> x + y *) and would be called as add 3 5 It seems to me to be just syntactic sugar that removes one set of parentheses from defining and calling the function. I've seen currying listed as one of the important features of a functional languages, and I'm a bit underwhelmed by it at the moment. The concept of creating a chain of functions that consume each a single parameter, instead of a function that takes a tuple seems rather complicated to use for a simple change of syntax. Is the slightly simpler syntax the only motivation for currying, or am I missing some other advantages that are not obvious in my very simple example? Is currying just syntactic sugar?

    Read the article

  • Design for XML mapping scenarios between two different systems [on hold]

    - by deepak_prn
    Mapping XML fields between two systems is a mundane routine in integration scenarios. I am trying to make the design documents look better and provide clear understanding to the developers especially when we do not use XSLT or any other IDE such as jDeveloper or eclipse plugins. I want it to be a high level design but at the same time talk in developer's language. So that there is no requirements that slip under the crack. For example, one of the scenarios goes: the store cashier sells an item, the transaction data is sent to Data management system. Now, I am writing a functional design for the scenario which deals with mapping XML fields between our system and the data management system. Question : I was wondering if some one had to deal with mapping XML fields between two systems? (without XSLT being involved) and if you used a table to represent the fields mapping (example is below) or any other visualization tool which does not break the bank ? I am trying to find out if there is a better way to represent XML mapping in your design documents. The widely accepted and used method seems to be using a simple table such as in the picture to illustrate the mapping. I am wondering if there are alternate ways/ tools to represent such as in Altova:

    Read the article

  • Test Data in a Distributed System

    - by Davin Tryon
    A question that has been vexing me lately has been about how to effectively test (end-to-end) features in a distributed system. Particuarly, how to effectively manage (through time) test data for feature testing. The system in question is a typical SOA setup. The composition is done in JavaScript when call to several REST APIs. Each service is built as an independent block. Each service has some kind of persistent storage (SQL Server in most cases). The main issue at the moment is how to approach test data when testing end-to-end features. Functional end-to-end testing occurs through the UI, and it is therefore necessary for test data to be set up before the test run (this could be manual or automated testing). As is typical in a distributed system, identifiers from one service are used as a link in another service. So, some level of synchronization needs to be present in the data to effectively test. What is the best way to manage and set up this data after a successful deployment to a test environment? For example, is it better to manage this test data inside each service? Or package it together with the testing suite? Does that testing suite exist as a separate project? I'm interested in design guidance about how to store and manage this test data as the application features evolve.

    Read the article

  • Performance of concurrent software on multicore processors

    - by Giorgio
    Recently I have often read that, since the trend is to build processors with multiple cores, it will be increasingly important to have programming languages that support concurrent programming in order to better exploit the parallelism offered by these processors. In this respect, certain programming paradigms or models are considered well-suited for writing robust concurrent software: Functional programming languages, e.g. Haskell, Scala, etc. The actor model: Erlang, but also available for Scala / Java (Akka), C++ (Theron, Casablanca, ...), and other programming languages. My questions: What is the state of the art regarding the development of concurrent applications (e.g. using multi-threading) using the above languages / models? Is this area still being explored or are there well-established practices already? Will it be more complex to program applications with a higher level of concurrency, or is it just a matter of learning new paradigms and practices? How does the performance of highly concurrent software compare to the performance of more traditional software when executed on multiple core processors? For example, has anyone implemented a desktop application using C++ / Theron, or Java / Akka? Was there a boost in performance on a multiple core processor due to higher parallelism?

    Read the article

  • Does immutability entirely eliminate the need for locks in multi-processor programming?

    - by GlenPeterson
    Part 1 Clearly Immutability minimizes the need for locks in multi-processor programming, but does it eliminate that need, or are there instances where immutability alone is not enough? It seems to me that you can only defer processing and encapsulate state so long before most programs have to actually DO something. If a program performs actions on multiple processors, something needs to collect and aggregate the results. All this involves multi-process communication before, after, and possibly during some transformations. The start and end state of the machines are different. Can this always be done with no locks just by throwing out each object and creating a new one instead of changing the original (a crude view of immutability)? What cases still require locking? I'm interested in both the theoretical/academic answer and the practical/real-world answer. I know a lot of functional programmers like to talk about "no side effect" but in the "real world" everything has a side effect. Every processor click takes time and electricity and machine resources away from other processes. So I understand that there may be more than one perspective to answer this question from. If immutability is safe, given certain bounds or assumptions, I want to know what the borders of the "safety zone" are exactly. Some examples of possible boundaries: I/O Exceptions/errors Interfaces with programs written in other languages Interfaces with other machines (physical, virtual, or theoretical) Special thanks to @JimmaHoffa for his comment which started this question! Part 2 Multi-processor programming is often used as an optimization technique - to make some code run faster. When is it faster to use locks vs. immutable objects? Given the limits set out in Amdahl's Law, when can you achieve better over-all performance (with or without the garbage collector taken into account) with immutable objects vs. locking mutable ones? Summary I'm combining these two questions into one to try to get at where the bounding box is for Immutability as a solution to threading problems.

    Read the article

  • Breaking up classes and methods into smaller units

    - by micahhoover
    During code reviews a couple devs have recommended I break up my methods into smaller methods. Their justification was (1) increased readability and (2) the back trace that comes back from production showing the method name is more specific to the line of code that failed. There may have also been some colorful words about functional programming. Additionally I think I may have failed an interview a while back because I didn't give an acceptable answer about when to break things up. My inclination is that when I see a bunch of methods in a class or across a bunch of files, it isn't clear to me how they flow together, and how many times each one gets called. I don't really have a good feel for the linearity of it as quickly just by eye-balling it. The other thing is a lot of people seem to place a premium of organization over content (e.g. 'Look at how organized my sock drawer is!' Me: 'Overall, I think I can get to my socks faster if you count the time it took to organize them'). Our business requirements are not very stable. I'm afraid that if the classes/methods are very granular it will take longer to refactor to requirement changes. I'm not sure how much of a factor this should be. Anyway, computer science is part art / part science, but I'm not sure how much this applies to this issue.

    Read the article

  • Is the Entity Component System architecture object oriented by definition?

    - by tieTYT
    Is the Entity Component System architecture object oriented, by definition? It seems more procedural or functional to me. My opinion is that it doesn't prevent you from implementing it in an OO language, but it would not be idiomatic to do so in a staunchly OO way. It seems like ECS separates data (E & C) from behavior (S). As evidence: The idea is to have no game methods embedded in the entity. And: The component consists of a minimal set of data needed for a specific purpose Systems are single purpose functions that take a set of entities which have a specific component I think this is not object oriented because a big part of being object oriented is combining your data and behavior together. As evidence: In contrast, the object-oriented approach encourages the programmer to place data where it is not directly accessible by the rest of the program. Instead, the data is accessed by calling specially written functions, commonly called methods, which are bundled in with the data. ECS, on the other hand, seems to be all about separating your data from your behavior.

    Read the article

  • Using foldr to append two lists together (Haskell)

    - by Luke Murphy
    I have been given the following question as part of a college assignment. Due to the module being very short, we are using only a subset of Haskell, without any of the syntactic sugar or idiomatic shortcuts....I must write: append xs ys : The list formed by joining the lists xs and ys, in that order append (5:8:3:[]) (4:7:[]) => 5:8:3:4:7:[] I understand the concept of how foldr works, but I am only starting off in Functional programming. I managed to write the following working solution (hidden for the benefit of others in my class...) : However, I just can't for the life of me, explain what the hell is going on!? I wrote it by just fiddling around in the interpreter, for example, the following line : foldr (\x -> \y -> x:y) [] (2:3:4:[]) which returned [2:3:4] , which led me to try, foldr (\x -> \y -> x:y) (2:3:4:[]) (5:6:7:[]) which returned [5,6,7,2,3,4] so I worked it out from there. I came to the correct solution through guess work and a bit of luck... I am working from the following definition of foldr: foldr = \f -> \s -> \xs -> if null xs then s else f (head xs) (foldr f s (tail xs) ) Can someone baby step me through my correct solution? I can't seem to get it....I already have scoured the web, and also read a bunch of SE threads, such as How foldr works

    Read the article

  • apt-get install fails due to dependency issues but apt-get -f install won't fix it

    - by user71941
    I've just installed Ubuntu 12.04 and was about to manually install Rawstudio with the packages from SourceForge repo, but I've been stuck with dependency issues and I am short on apt command lines to sort this out. Here's the report I'v got : installArchives() failed: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2: libgphoto2-2 depends on libjpeg62; however: Package libjpeg62 is not installed. libgphoto2-l10n (2.4.13-1ubuntu1) breaks libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-4) and is installed. Version of libgphoto2-2 to be configured is 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2-dev: libgphoto2-2-dev depends on libgphoto2-2 (= 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick); however: Package libgphoto2-2 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-2-dev Error in function: SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2: libgphoto2-2 depends on libjpeg62; however: Package libjpeg62 is not installed. libgphoto2-l10n (2.4.13-1ubuntu1) breaks libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-4) and is installed. Version of libgphoto2-2 to be configured is 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2-dev: libgphoto2-2-dev depends on libgphoto2-2 (= 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick); however: Package libgphoto2-2 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured I've tried "apt-get -f install" but without success. What is the mahick command line that will unblock the situation ? Thanks Seb

    Read the article

  • How to fix "apt-get upgrade" errors?

    - by mohamad farid bin abdullah
    I get these errors when I try to upgrade the packages installed on my Ubuntu system: m@m-desktop ~ $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Setting up drbd8-source (2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.3) ... Removing old drbd8-8.3.7 DKMS files... ------------------------------ Deleting module version: 8.3.7 completely from the DKMS tree. ------------------------------ Done. Loading new drbd8-8.3.7 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... Building only for 2.6.35-22-generic Building for architecture i386 Building initial module for 2.6.35-22-generic Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic (i386) Consult the make.log in the build directory /var/lib/dkms/drbd8/8.3.7/build/ for more information. dpkg: error processing drbd8-source (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of drbd8-utils: drbd8-utils depends on drbd8-source; however: Package drbd8-source is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing drbd8-utils (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. Errors were encountered while processing: drbd8-source drbd8-utils E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) m@m-desktop ~ $

    Read the article

  • Stuck removing ffmpeg from system due to package problems

    - by Michiel
    I'd be very grateful to get a bit of support on the following situation: Using Ubuntu 12.04, and I used the PPA of Jon Severinson for ffmpeg. I had a problem playing movies with mplayer, so I decided to remove the PPA and try to use libav only after I read this article about libav vs ffmpeg. I first removed the PPA from the list, then apt-get update, etc. But I couldn't remove ffmpeg due to dependency-errors and got stuck in what seemed some kind of loop. Then I found a suggestion here. I followed the steps, and ended up force-removing libavcodec-extra-53. Because, apparently that was "what got stuff moving again". At the moment I can't. Now Ubuntu is reporting a broken package (BrokenCount 0). Errors: De afhankelijkheden van de volgende pakketten konden niet geïnstalleerd worden: audacious-plugins: Depends: audacious-plugins-data (= 3.2.1-4ubuntu1) maar 3.2.1-4ubuntu1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libcurl3-gnutls (= 7.16.2-1) maar 7.22.0-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) maar 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpulse0 (= 1:0.99.1) maar 1:1.1-0ubuntu15.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.6) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libwavpack1 (= 4.40.0) maar 4.60.1-2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libxcomposite1 (= 1:0.3-1) maar 1:0.4.3-2build1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4) maar 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd libavfilter-extra-2: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libswresample-extra-0 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd libavformat-extra-53: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd libk3b6-extracodecs: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libkdecore5 (= 4:4.4.4) maar 4:4.8.4a-0ubuntu0.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libkio5 (= 4:4.4.4) maar 4:4.8.4a-0ubuntu0.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.7.0~beta1) maar 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.1.1) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd libquicktime2: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd libxine1-ffmpeg: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.4) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libxine1-bin (= 1.1.20-2build1) maar 1.1.20-2build1 is geïnstalleerd mencoder: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd mplayer: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd vlc: Depends: vlc-nox (= 2.0.3-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) maar 2.0.3-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.15) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libfreetype6 (= 2.2.1) maar 2.4.8-1ubuntu2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) maar 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.0) maar 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libqtgui4 (= 4:4.7.0~beta1) maar 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.6) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg) maar 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd vlc-nox: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libc6 (= 2.15) maar 2.15-0ubuntu10 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libfontconfig1 (= 2.8.0) maar 2.8.0-3ubuntu9.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libfreetype6 (= 2.2.1) maar 2.4.8-1ubuntu2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) maar 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libgnutls26 (= 2.12.6.1-0) maar 2.12.14-5ubuntu3.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libmpcdec6 (= 1:0.1~r435) maar 2:0.1~r459-1ubuntu1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libncursesw5 (= 5.6+20070908) maar 5.9-4 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libsmbclient (= 3.0.24) maar 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libstdc++6 (= 4.6) maar 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libudev0 (= 147) maar 175-0ubuntu9.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libxml2 (= 2.7.4) maar 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4.1 is geïnstalleerd Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.2.0.2) maar 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 is geïnstalleerd xbmc-bin: Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libavfilter-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavformat-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libavutil-extra-51 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd Depends: libpostproc-extra-52 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Depends: libswscale-extra-2 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2 is geïnstalleerd And apt-get is reporting: root@LAPTOP:~# apt-get -f install Pakketlijsten worden ingelezen... Klaar Boom van vereisten wordt opgebouwd De status informatie wordt gelezen... Klaar Vereisten worden gecorrigeerd... mislukt. De volgende pakketten hebben niet-voldane vereisten: audacious-plugins : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libavfilter-extra-2 : Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libavformat-extra-53 : Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd Vereisten: libavcodec-extra-53 (< 6:0.10.4.0ubuntu0jon2.2-99) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libk3b6-extracodecs : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libquicktime2 : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8~beta2-2) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd libxine1-ffmpeg : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.7.3-1) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd mencoder : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd mplayer : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd vlc : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd vlc-nox : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd xbmc-bin : Vereisten: libavcodec53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd of libavcodec-extra-53 (= 4:0.8-1~) maar het is niet geïnstalleerd E: Fout, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve maakte scheidingen aan, dit kan veroorzaakt worden door vastgehouden pakketten. E: Kan vereisten niet corrigeren How to proceed?? Thanks in advance, Michiel

    Read the article

  • Should my WCF webservice return a 500 or 200 http code (soap fault / functional return message)

    - by Tim Mahy
    Hi all, after reading the SOAP specs, it states that a SOAP Fault should return a http 500 errorcode, so when a SoapException is thrown, WCF returns a 500 error code. Now, I'm looking for some best practices to when return a functional soap error message and when to return a SOAP Fault. What would you guys return when a functional error occurred while processing the message because of the input message contains some functional errors, a 500 SOAP Fault or a 200 Soap response containing some error message ?

    Read the article

  • How do I create a .deb file?

    - by JamesTheAwesomeDude
    Yes, I know that this question has been asked many times before, but none of the answers really helped. I'd like to package the Minecraft launcher (which has no proprietary code, AFAIK,) into a .deb file so that I can put it on a flash drive and share it with my friends. I have managed to install Minecraft it manually (put some files into /opt/minecraft, download an icon, and create a .desktop file in /usr/share/applications,) and I have made a shell script that completely automates the process, but it relies on wget to retrieve a few files, including the .desktop file. (It isn't a self-extracting archive, after all.) I'd like to be able to do this offline, as a lot of my friends have slow or no internet. (One of their internet lines was buried so shallowly that it actually got knocked out by the lawnmower.) I won't be loading it into a PPA or anything like that; I just want it to be a "formal" package that can be easily installed and uninstalled. (One thing that I would like is for sudo apt-get purge minecraft to also remove the .minecraft folder. It would also be nice to define the dependedcies as being able to accept OpenJDK or Sun's JVM.) Oh, just so you know, the Minecraft launcher is a .jar file, but I can very, very easily launch it via shell scripts. The exact command is right on the download page.

    Read the article

  • Wine / PlayOnLinux dependency issues when trying to install

    - by Glutanimate
    I am curious as to why installing PlayOnLinux entails removing seemingly unrelated packages like google-earth-stable. Is this the expected behaviour? This is the output I get when trying to install playonlinux through apt-get: The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: python-scour pax ncurses-term Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: binfmt-support fonts-horai-umefont fonts-unfonts-core libcapi20-3 libgif4:i386 libmpg123-0 libodbc1 libpam-winbind ttf-umefont ttf-unfonts-core unixodbc winbind wine wine-gecko1.4 wine-gecko1.4:i386 wine1.4 wine1.4-amd64 wine1.4-common wine1.4-i386:i386 winetricks Suggested packages: libmyodbc odbc-postgresql tdsodbc unixodbc-bin dosbox Recommended packages: gettext:i386 unixodbc:i386 The following packages will be REMOVED: alien cdbs debhelper dh-make dh-translations gettext google-earth-stable intltool intltool-debian lsb-core po-debconf The following NEW packages will be installed: binfmt-support fonts-horai-umefont fonts-unfonts-core libcapi20-3 libgif4:i386 libmpg123-0 libodbc1 libpam-winbind playonlinux ttf-umefont ttf-unfonts-core unixodbc winbind wine wine-gecko1.4 wine-gecko1.4:i386 wine1.4 wine1.4-amd64 wine1.4-common wine1.4-i386:i386 winetricks 0 upgraded, 21 newly installed, 11 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 145 MB of archives. After this operation, 275 MB of additional disk space will be used. This is the first time I am trying to install Wine / POL. I am using the default repositories, no Wine PPA or POL source added. These are all the PPAs I am using: How do I install POL / Wine without having to remove all these packages?

    Read the article

  • How do I fix my installation of ATI Catalyst Video Drivers in 12.04 LTS?

    - by Boris
    My graphic card is a Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series. I tried these 2 answers from What is the correct way to install ATI Catalyst Video Drivers in 12.04 LTS? But unfortunately, it does not work for me: When running the amd script, I get this error message: $ sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-12-4-x86.x86_64.run ... DKMS part of installation failed. Please refer to /usr/share/ati/fglrx-install.log for details When checking this log file, I get: Uninstalling any previously installed drivers. Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.961/source -> /usr/src/fglrx-8.961 DKMS: add completed. Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping... Building module: cleaning build area.... cd /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.961/build; sh make.sh --nohints --uname_r=3.2.0-24-generic-pae --norootcheck......(bad exit status: 1) [Error] Kernel Module : Failed to build fglrx-8.961 with DKMS [Error] Kernel Module : Removing fglrx-8.961 from DKMS Deleting module version: 8.961 completely from the DKMS tree. Done. [Reboot] Kernel Module : update-initramfs When checking with fglrxinfo, I get: $ fglrxinfo X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation) Major opcode of failed request: 138 (ATIFGLEXTENSION) Minor opcode of failed request: 66 () Serial number of failed request: 13 Current serial number in output stream: 13

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >