Search Results

Search found 23323 results on 933 pages for 'worst is better'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 18/933 | < Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >

  • Which is better: JNP or Corba?

    - by Juvinao
    Hello. I've try with EJB 3.0 and swing client and i've tried with glassfish and jboss as application server when i did use glassfish, the comunication is via corba. when i did use jboss, the comunication is via JNP. in my tests the JNP was faster than corba who has some like this?, and who could tell me which is better: JNP or Corba? and why? thanks

    Read the article

  • References for better performance of newer JSF specifications

    - by Pentius
    Dear fellows, I'm looking for a reference to cite, which states that JSF 1.2 performs better than JSF 1.1. Or JSF 2.0 over JSF 1.2 respectively. I'm quite sure that I've read something like this before but can't find it anymore. Maybe you can help. Or is this mischief and there are no official statements regarding the performance?

    Read the article

  • SQLAlchemy: a better way for update with declarative?

    - by hadrien
    I am a SQLAlchemy noob. Let's say I have an user table in declarative mode: class User(Base): __tablename__ = 'user' id = Column(u'id', Integer(), primary_key=True) name = Column(u'name', String(50)) When I know user's id without object loaded into session, I update such user like this: ex = update(User.__table__).where(User.id==123).values(name=u"Bob Marley") Session.execute(ex) I dislike using User.__table__, should I stop worrying with that? Is there a better way to do this? Thanx!

    Read the article

  • Why is git better than Subversion?

    - by Ben Mills
    I've been using Subversion for a few years and after using SourceSafe, I just love Subversion. Combined with TortoiseSVN, I can't really imagine how it could be any better. Yet there's a growing number of developers claiming that Subversion has problems and that we should be moving to the new breed of distributed version control systems, such as Git. Can anyone explain how Git improves upon Subversion?

    Read the article

  • Paginating data, has to be a better way

    - by John Tyler
    I've read like 10 or so "tutorials", and they all involve the same thing: Pull a count of the data set Pull the relevant data set (LIMIT, OFFSET) IE: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE something = ? SELECT * FROM table WHERE something =? LIMIT ? offset ?` Two very similar queries, no? There has to be a better way to do this, my dataset is 600,000+ rows and already sluggish (results are determined by over 30 where clauses, and vary from user to user, but are properly indexed of course).

    Read the article

  • javascript object's - private methods: which way is better.

    - by Praveen Prasad
    (function () { function User() { //some properties } //private fn 1 User.prototype._aPrivateFn = function () { //private function defined just like a public function, //for convetion underscore character is added } //private function type 2 //a closure function _anotherPrivateFunction() { // do something } //public function User.prototype.APublicFunction = function () { //call private fn1 this._aPrivateFn(); //call private fn2 _anotherPrivateFunction(); } window.UserX = User; })(); //which of the two ways of defining private methods of a javascript object is better way, specially in sense of memory management and performance.

    Read the article

  • Better alternative to autonumber primary keys

    - by Comrad_Durandal
    I am looking for a better primary key than the autonumber data type, namely for the reason that it's limited to a long integer, when I really just need the field to reflect a number or text string that will never ever repeat, no matter HOW many records are added or deleted from the table. The problem is I am not sure how to implement something like turning the current date and time into a hexadecimal string and using that as a unique field I can use as a primary key. Am I just being too paranoid about running out of space?

    Read the article

  • What will be better view with JSF technology

    - by Paul
    I am using Struts Tiles with JSF to have one header, menu and footer across application. Is there any other like struts to have one header, menu and footer. Is this feature available in faceslets and what viewing technology would be better for easy development.

    Read the article

  • Help me to find a better approach-Design Pattern

    - by DJay
    I am working on an ASP.Net web application in which several WCF services are being used. At client level, I am creating channel factory mechanism to invoke service operations. Right now, I have created an assembly having classes used for channel factory creation code for every service. As per my assumption this is some sort of facade pattern. Please help me to find a better approach or any design pattern, which I can use here.

    Read the article

  • What would be a better way of doing the following

    - by thecoshman
    if(get_magic_quotes_gpc()) { $location_name = trim(mysql_real_escape_string(trim(stripslashes($_GET['location_name'])))); } else { $location_name = trim(mysql_real_escape_string(trim($_GET['location_name']))); } That's the code I have so far. seems to me this code is fundamentally ... OK. Do you think I can safely remove the inner trim(). Please try not a spam me with endless version of this, I want to try to learn how to do this better.

    Read the article

  • SQLAlchemy: an efficient/better select by primary keys?

    - by hadrien
    Yet another newbie question.. Let's say I have an user table in declarative mode: class User(Base): __tablename__ = 'user' id = Column(u'id', Integer(), primary_key=True) name = Column(u'name', String(50)) When I have a list of users identifiers, I fetch them from db with: user_ids = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] users = Session.query(User).filter(User.id.in_(user_ids)).all() I dislike using in_ because I think I learned it has bad performance on indexed fields (is that true/false?). Anyway, is there a better way doing that query? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is there a better way to format this date string

    - by Mark Breen
    Hello is there are better way to structure this line of code, as you can see, I am changing the format of a string that contains a date. lblCourseStartDate.Text = String.Format("{0:D}", DateTime.Parse(CourseStartDate)); I just found it untidy that I am converting twice or three times to get the format I want. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Better mode for do a select with group by

    - by Luca Romagnoli
    Hi i've wrote a query that works: SELECT `comments`.* FROM `comments` RIGHT JOIN (SELECT MAX( id ) AS id, core_id, topic_id FROM comments GROUP BY core_id, topic_id order by id desc) comm ON comm.id = comments.id LIMIT 10 I want know if is possible and how rewrite it for get better performance. thanks

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >