Search Results

Search found 13249 results on 530 pages for 'virtualized performance'.

Page 184/530 | < Previous Page | 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191  | Next Page >

• career change : non-functional to test automation

  - by centennial

  I started my Career as core-Java developer 6 years ago and stayed as developer for 6-7 month and then moved to performance testing (actualy pushed into this for short term and later I started liking it). I have done all sort of non-functional testing like performance, load, stress, soak, compatibility, failover etc on many performance test tools accross many industries. I was doing contracting all these years which means I kept moving to new projects after every 3-6 months. Now personal situation has been changed, married man now so looking for something long term. Performance testing generally comes at the end of the development life cycle hence very short term contracts so I was wondering if I can move into functional/test automation side I can earn myself good length of contract. I had some exposure of QTP but I am sure to learn all other tools very quickly as I am quite good in programming and concept of testing. in short I want to move into functional test automation to get long term contract without leaving my love for programming . any thoughts please ?

  Read the article

• Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

  - by mseika

  Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service. Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013. Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

  Read the article

• Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

  - by mseika

  Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.  New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013.   Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

  Read the article

• Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

  - by mseika

  Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service. Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013. Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

  Read the article

• Enablement 2.0 Get Specialized

  - by mseika

  Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized program is releasing new certifications on our latest products, and partners are invited to be the first candidates.Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization – Now Active!This specialization recognizes partner organizations that are proficient in positioning, selling and implementing Taleo’s Enterprise Talent Management solutions.Taleo's Talent Management Cloud helps organizations attract, develop, motivate and retain human capital to improve performance and drive growth. Oracle’s Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service 2013 Specialization encompasses the following products: Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service. Topics covered in this Specialization include: Selling and positioning Taleo’s Talent Management Cloud; Functional and Technical positioning. Implementation tracks are included for Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service, Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service and Oracle Taleo Performance Management Cloud Service.Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Taleo Enterprise Cloud Service.New Certified Implementation Specialist Exam in Production! Oracle Taleo Recruiting Cloud Service 2013 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z0-474) All Beta exam participants will receive their exam scores as of beginning of July 2013. The successful candidates will receive their certificates starting mid-July 2013. Take the exam now at a near-by Pearson VUE testing center!Contact Us Please direct any inquiries you may have to Oracle Partner Enablement team at [email protected].

  Read the article

• How DBAs Can Tune Distributed IBM DB2 Applications

  Many critical business applications now execute in an environment separate from that of the enterprise database server. The database administrator often finds monitoring and performance tuning of these "distributed" applications to be especially difficult. This article looks at common performance issues of distributed applications and presents advice to assist the IBM DB2 database administrator in mitigating performance problems.

  Read the article

• MySQL December Webinars

  - by Bertrand Matthelié

  We'll be running 3 webinars next week and hope many of you will be able to join us: MySQL Replication: Simplifying Scaling and HA with GTIDs Wednesday, December 12, at 15.00 Central European TimeJoin the MySQL replication developers for a deep dive into the design and implementation of Global Transaction Identifiers (GTIDs) and how they enable users to simplify MySQL scaling and HA. GTIDs are one of the most significant new replication capabilities in MySQL 5.6, making it simple to track and compare replication progress between the master and slave servers. Register Now MySQL 5.6: Building the Next Generation of Web/Cloud/SaaS/Embedded Applications and Services Thursday, December 13, at 9.00 am Pacific Time As the world's most popular web database, MySQL has quickly become the leading cloud database, with most providers offering MySQL-based services. Indeed, built to deliver web-based applications and to scale out, MySQL's architecture and features make the database a great fit to deliver cloud-based applications. In this webinar we will focus on the improvements in MySQL 5.6 performance, scalability, and availability designed to enable DBA and developer agility in building the next generation of web-based applications. Register Now Getting the Best MySQL Performance in Your Products: Part IV, Partitioning Friday, December 14, at 9.00 am Pacific Time We're adding Partitioning to our extremely popular "Getting the Best MySQL Performance in Your Products" webinar series. Partitioning can greatly increase the performance of your queries, especially when doing full table scans over large tables. Partitioning is also an excellent way to manage very large tables. It's one of the best ways to build higher performance into your product's embedded or bundled MySQL, and particularly for hardware-constrained appliances and devices. Register Now We have live Q&A during all webinars so you'll get the opportunity to ask your questions!

  Read the article

• The Ultimate Troubleshooter

  A valuable resource manager that can improve your PC's performance, startup times, and overall stability

  Read the article

• Security - "Encrypting Tablespaces"

  Encrypt tablespaces transparently—without affecting performance.

  Read the article

• Booting a virtual os on a physical environment

  - by Nrew

  Is there an application that allows you to add a virtualized version of your operating system into the mbr? By virtualized, I mean that if you boot this one, any changes made in it will not be committed to the disk. Just like how deepfreeze, returnil, and shadow user works. Is it possible to do that? Because the applications mentioned above requires you to reboot if you want that changes will not be retained.

  Read the article

• Adding more RAM at different speeds? Will it impact performance as much as to make it worse than without adding it?

  - by user1676874

  I got a new laptop with 4GBs of ram, expandable to 8GBs. It has 1 4GB stick DDR3 PC3-12800 at 1600Mhz. I can't seem to find another one exactly the same locally, the closest I've found is 1 4GB stick DDR3 PC3-10600 at 1333Mhz. So my question is, I know they will both run at the slowest speed, so even if I have more available RAM it will become slower. Is the performance loss big enough to make the upgrade not worth the hassle?

  Read the article

• We are moving to two servers from one server due to performance issues. How do we monitor the value of this change?

  - by MikeN

  We are moving to two servers from one server due to performance issues. We are moving our MySQL DB to its own dedicated server and will keep the original machine as the front end machine running nginx/apache (Django backend.) How do we monitor the value of this change? It is possible our whole site could actually get slower since the MySQL queries will be going out over a secure remote connection instead of locally?

  Read the article

• calculate AUC (GAM) in R [migrated]

  - by ahmad

  I used the following script to calculate AUC in R: library(mgcv) library(ROCR) library(AUC) data1=read.table("d:\\2005.txt", header=T) GAM<-gam(tuna ~ s(chla)+s(sst)+s(ssha),family=binomial, data=data1) gampred<- predict(GAM, type="response") rp <- prediction(gampred, data1$tuna) auc <- performance( rp, "auc")@y.values[[1]] auc roc <- performance( rp, "tpr", "fpr") plot( roc ) But when I was running the script, the result is: **rp <- prediction(gampred, data1$tuna) Error in prediction(gampred, data1$tuna) : Format of predictions is invalid. > > auc <- performance( rp, "auc")@y.values[[1]] Error in performance(rp, "auc") : object 'rp' not found > auc function (x, min = 0, max = 1) { if (any(class(x) == "roc")) { if (min != 0 || max != 1) { x$fpr <- x$fpr[x$cutoffs >= min & x$cutoffs <= max] x$tpr <- x$tpr[x$cutoffs >= min & x$cutoffs <= max] } ans <- 0 for (i in 2:length(x$fpr)) { ans <- ans + 0.5 * abs(x$fpr[i] - x$fpr[i - 1]) * (x$tpr[i] + x$tpr[i - 1]) } } else if (any(class(x) %in% c("accuracy", "sensitivity", "specificity"))) { if (min != 0 || max != 1) { x$cutoffs <- x$cutoffs[x$cutoffs >= min & x$cutoffs <= max] x$measure <- x$measure[x$cutoffs >= min & x$cutoffs <= max] } ans <- 0 for (i in 2:(length(x$cutoffs))) { ans <- ans + 0.5 * abs(x$cutoffs[i - 1] - x$cutoffs[i]) * (x$measure[i] + x$measure[i - 1]) } } return(as.numeric(ans)) } <bytecode: 0x03012f10> <environment: namespace:AUC> > > roc <- performance( rp, "tpr", "fpr") Error in performance(rp, "tpr", "fpr") : object 'rp' not found > plot( roc ) Error in levels(labels) : argument "labels" is missing, with no default** Can anybody help me to solve this problem? Thank you in advance.

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2005: Improving performance for thousands or Insert requests. logout-login time= 120ms.

  - by Rad

  Can somebody shed some lights on how SQL Server 2005 deals with may request issued by a client using ADO.NET 2.0. Below is the shortend output of SQL Trace. I can see that connection pooling is working (I believe there is only one connection being pooled). What is not clear to me is why we have so many sp_reset_connection calls i.e a series of: Audit Login, SQL:BatchStarting, RPC:Starting and Audit Logout for each loop in for loop below. I can see that there is constant switching between tempdb and master database which leads me to conclude that we lost the context when next connection is created by fetching it from the pool based on ConectionString argument. I can see that every 15ms I can get 100-200 login/logout per second (reported at the same time by Profiler). The after 15ms I have again a series fo 100-200 login/logout per second. I need clarification on how this might affect much complex insert queries in production environment. I use Enterprise Library 2006, the code is compiled with VS 2005 and it is a console application that parses a flat file with 10 of thousand of rows grouping parent-child rows, runs on an application server and runs 2 stored procedure on a remote SQL Server 2005 inserting a parent record, retrieves Identity value and using it calls the second stored procedure 1, 2 or multiple times (sometimes several thousands) inserting child records. The child table has close to 10 million records with 5-10 indexes some of them being covering non-clustered. There is a pretty complex Insert trigger that copies inserted detail record to an archive table. All in all I only have 7 inserts per second which means it can take 2-4 hours for 50 thousand records. When I run Profiler on the test server (that is almost equivalent with production server) I can see that there is about 120ms between Audit Logout and Audit Login trace entries which almost give me chance to insert about 8 records. So my question is if there is some way to improve inserting of records since the company loads 100 thousands of records and does daily planning and has SLA to fulfill client request coming as flat file orders and some big files 10 thousands have to be processed(imported quickly). 4 hours to import 60 thousands should be reduced to 30 minutes. I was thinking to use BatchSize of DataAdapter to send multiple stored procedure calls, SQL Bulk inserts to batch multiple inserts from DataReader or DataTable, SSIS fast load. But I don't know how to properly analyze re-indexing and stats population and maybe this has to take some time to finish. What is worse is that the company uses the biggest table for reporting and other online processing and indexes cannot be dropped. I manage transaction manually by setting a field to a value and do an transactional update changing that value to a new value that other applications are using to get committed rows. Please advise how to approach this problem. For now I am trying to have a staging tables with minimal logging in a separate database and no indexes and I will try to do batched (massive) parent child inserts. I believe Production DB has simple recovery model, but it could be full recovery. If DB user that is being used by my .NET console application has bulkadmin role does it mean its bulk inserts are minimally logged. I understand that when a table has clustered and many non-clustered indexes that inserts are still logged for each row. Connection pooling is working, but with many login/logouts. Why? for (int i = 1; i <= 10000; i++){ using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("server=(local);database=master;integrated security=sspi;")) {conn.Open(); using (SqlCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand()){ cmd.CommandText = "use tempdb"; cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();}}} SQL Server Profiler trace: Audit Login master 2010-01-13 23:18:45.337 1 - Nonpooled SQL:BatchStarting use tempdb master 2010-01-13 23:18:45.337 RPC:Starting exec sp_reset_conn tempdb 2010-01-13 23:18:45.337 Audit Logout tempdb 2010-01-13 23:18:45.337 2 - Pooled Audit Login -- network protocol master 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 2 - Pooled SQL:BatchStarting use tempdb master 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 RPC:Starting exec sp_reset_conn tempdb 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 Audit Logout tempdb 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 2 - Pooled Audit Login -- network protocol master 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 2 - Pooled SQL:BatchStarting use tempdb master 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 RPC:Starting exec sp_reset_conn tempdb 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 Audit Logout tempdb 2010-01-13 23:18:45.383 2 - Pooled

  Read the article

• How do the performance characteristics of jQuery selectors differ from those of CSS selectors?

  - by Moss

  I came across Google's Page Speed add-on for Firebug yesterday. The page about using efficient CSS selectors said to not use overqualified selectors, i.e. use #foo instead of div#foo. I thought the latter would be faster but Google's saying otherwise, and who am I to go against that? So that got me wondering if the same applied to jQuery selectors. This page I found the link to on SO says I should use $("div#foo"), which is what I was doing all along, since I thought that things would speed up by limiting the selector to match div elements only. But is it really better than writing $("#foo") like Google's saying for CSS selectors, or do CSS versus jQuery element matching work in different ways and I should stick with $("div#foo")?

  Read the article

• VTD-XML Parsing Performance (speed critical factor). Requesting Feedback/Comments

  - by andreas

  Hello, I am about to use VTD-XML (found at http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/) but I am interested in getting real-case usage feedback, by any one that has used the library and has any comments. At the URL (http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/) there are benchmarks but if someone has used VTD-XML and has comments FOR it I would like to hear them. Speed is a critical factor in the application and comments after real-case usage, by developers, is what i am looking for. Regards,

  Read the article

• Why does my performance increase when touching the screen?

  - by Smills

  For some reason my FPS jumps up considerably when I move my mouse around on the screen (on the emulator) while holding the left mouse button. Normally my game is very laggy, but if I touch the screen (and as long as I am moving the mouse around while touching) it goes perfectly smooth. I have tried sleeping for 20ms in the onTouchEvent, but it doesn't appear to make any difference. Here is the code I use in my onTouchEvent: // events when touching the screen public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) { int eventaction = event.getAction(); touchX=event.getX(); touchY=event.getY(); switch (eventaction) { case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN: { touch=true; } break; case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE: { } break; case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP: { touch=false; } break; } /*try { AscentThread.sleep(20); } catch (InterruptedException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); }*/ return true; } In the logcat log, FPS is the current fps (average of the last 20 frames), touch is whether or not the screen is being touched (from onTouchEvent). What on earth is going on? Has anyone else had this odd behaviour before? Logcat log: 12-21 19:43:26.154: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 31.686569159606414 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:27.624: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 19.46310293212206 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:29.104: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.801202175690467 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:30.514: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 21.118295877408478 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:31.985: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 19.117397812958878 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:33.534: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 15.572571858239263 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:34.934: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 20.584119901503506 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:36.404: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.888025905454207 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:37.814: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 22.35722329083629 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:39.353: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 15.73604859775362 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:40.763: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 20.912449882754633 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:42.233: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.785278388997718 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:43.634: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 20.1357397209596 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:45.043: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 21.961138432007957 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:46.453: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 22.167196852834273 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:47.854: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 22.207318228024274 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:49.264: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 22.36980559230175 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:50.604: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 23.587638823252547 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:52.073: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 19.233902040593076 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:53.624: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 15.542190150440987 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:55.034: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 20.82290063974675 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:56.436: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 21.975282007207717 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:57.914: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.786927284103687 Touch: false 12-21 19:43:59.393: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.96879004217992 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:00.625: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 28.367566618064878 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:02.113: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 19.04441528684418 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:03.585: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.807837511809065 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:04.993: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 21.134330284993418 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:06.275: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 27.209688764079907 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:07.753: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 19.055894653261653 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:09.163: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 22.05422794901088 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:10.644: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.6956805300596 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:12.124: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 17.434180581311054 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:13.594: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.71932038510891 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:14.504: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 40.94571503868066 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:14.924: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 57.061200121138576 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:15.364: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 62.54377946377936 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:15.764: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 64.05005071818726 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:16.384: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 50.912951172948155 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:16.874: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 55.31242053078078 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:17.364: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 59.31625410615102 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:18.413: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 36.63504170925923 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:19.885: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.099130467755923 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:21.363: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 18.458978222946566 Touch: false 12-21 19:44:22.683: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 25.582179409330823 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:23.044: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 60.99865521942455 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:23.403: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 74.17873975470984 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:23.763: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 64.25663040460714 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:24.113: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 62.47483457826921 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:24.473: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 65.27969529547072 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:24.825: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 67.84743115273311 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:25.173: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 73.50854551357706 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:25.523: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 70.46432534585368 Touch: true 12-21 19:44:25.873: INFO/myActivity(786): FPS: 69.04076953445896 Touch: true

  Read the article

• Silverlight performance with a large number of Objects Org Chart.

  - by KC

  Hello, I’m working on a org chart project(SL 3) and I’m seeing the UI thread hang when the chart is building around 2,000 nodes and when it renders it takes about a min and then FPS drop to a crawl. Here is the code flow. Page.xaml.cs calls a wcf service that returns a list of AD users. Then we use Linq to build a collection of nodes to bind to the Orgchart.cs OrgChart.cs is a canvas and displays a collection of nodes and connecting lines. Node.cs is a canvas and has user data can contain children nodes. NodeContent.xaml is a user control that has borders so I can set the background, textblocks to display user's data, Events that handle the selected and expaned nodes, and storyboards that resize the nodes when they are selected or expanded.I noticed during hours of debugging , here in the InitializeComponent(); section where it loads the xaml it seems to be where the preformance hit is happening. System.Windows.Application.LoadComponent(this, new System.Uri("/Silverlight.Custom;component/NodeContent.xaml", System.UriKind.Relative)); So I guess I have two questions. Can threading help in any way with the UI thread hanging while drawing the nodes? How can I avoid the hit when calling this user control? Any advice or direction anyone can lend would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, KC

  Read the article

• Linq Query Performance , comparing Compiled query vs Non-Compiled.

  - by AG.

  Hello Guys, I was wondering if i extract the common where clause query into a common expression would it make my query much faster, if i have say something like 10 linq queries on a collection with exact same 1st part of the where clause. I have done a small example to explain a bit more . public class Person { public string First { get; set; } public string Last { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } public String Born { get; set; } public string Living { get; set; } } public sealed class PersonDetails : List<Person> { } PersonDetails d = new PersonDetails(); d.Add(new Person() {Age = 29, Born = "Timbuk Tu", First = "Joe", Last = "Bloggs", Living = "London"}); d.Add(new Person() { Age = 29, Born = "Timbuk Tu", First = "Foo", Last = "Bar", Living = "NewYork" }); Expression<Func<Person, bool>> exp = (a) => a.Age == 29; Func<Person, bool> commonQuery = exp.Compile(); var lx = from y in d where commonQuery.Invoke(y) && y.Living == "London" select y; var bx = from y in d where y.Age == 29 && y.Living == "NewYork" select y; Console.WriteLine("All Details {0}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {4}", lx.Single().Age, lx.Single().First , lx.Single().Last, lx.Single().Living, lx.Single().Born ); Console.WriteLine("All Details {0}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {4}", bx.Single().Age, bx.Single().First, bx.Single().Last, bx.Single().Living, bx.Single().Born); So can some of the guru's here give me some advice if it would be a good practice to write query like var lx = "Linq Expression " or var bx = "Linq Expression" ? Any inputs would be highly appreciated. Thanks, AG

  Read the article

• ASP.NET Web App to compare performance on different hardware?

  - by Guy

  I'm looking for an open source C# ASP.NET Web App that can be loaded onto 2 or more dedicated servers and provide me with metrics on how that server is performing. E.g. Click on a page and the app does a number of in-memory iterations and/or calculations to test processor throughput. Another page would do a bunch of disk access and report on that. I could put one together myself but there might already be something out there with a whole ton of tools in it to do this. I would imagine that I'm not the first one that would want to compare two machines for use as a web server.

  Read the article

• (Oracle Performance) Will a query based on a view limit the view using the where clause?

  - by BestPractices

  In Oracle (10g), when I use a View (not Materialized View), does Oracle take into account the where clause when it executes the view? Let's say I have: MY_VIEW = SELECT * FROM PERSON P, ORDERS O WHERE P.P_ID = O.P_ID And I then execute the following: SELECT * FROM MY_VIEW WHERE MY_VIEW.P_ID = '1234' When this executes, does oracle first execute the query for the view and THEN filter it based on my where clause (where MY_VIEW.P_ID = '1234') or does it do this filtering as part of the execution of the view? If it does not do the latter, and P_ID had an index, would I also lose out on the indexing capability since Oracle would be executing my query against the view which doesn't have the index rather than the base table which has the index?

  Read the article

• Is using iframes to improve page performance an acceptable approach?

  - by Denis Hoctor

  Hi all, I have a complex page that has several user controls like galleries, maps, ads etc. I've tried optimising them by ensuring full separation of html/css/js, placing js at the bottom of the page and trying to ensure I have well written code in all 3 but alas I still have a slow page. It's not really noticeable to a modern browser but can see the stats and IE6/7. So I'm now looking to do what we've done previously for Adtech flash crap - an iframe. Apart from the SEO impact which I'm not worried about in the case of these controls, what do people think of this as an approach? PROS and CONS please. Thanks, Denis

  Read the article

• Is there any performance difference between Debug and Release?

  - by Lazlo

  I'm using MySql Connector .NET to load an account and transfer it to the client. This operation is rather intensive, considering the child elements of the account to load. In Debug mode, it takes, at most, 1 second to load the account. The average would be 500ms. In Release mode, it takes from 1 to 4 seconds to load the account. The average would be 1500ms. Since there is no #if DEBUG directive or the like in my code, I'm wondering where the difference is coming from. Is there a project build option I could change? Or does it have to do with MySql Connector .NET that would have different behaviors depending on the build mode?

  Read the article

• Which number of processes will give me the best performance ?

  - by Maarten

  I am doing some expensive caluations right now. It is one programm, which I run several instances of at the same time. I am running them under linux on a machine with 4 cpus with 6 cores each. The cpus are Intel Xeon X5660, which support hyper thearting. (That's some insane hardware, huh?) Right now I am running 24 processes at once. Would it be better to run more, b/c of HT ?

  Read the article

• How to implement SVN pre-commit hook with best performance?

  - by mliebelt

  We have the following tools in place: Subversion (Version 1.5.9) Polarion (version 3.2.2) Polarion is based on Subversion, so on every action that changes anything (which is often the case), Polarion will use a Subversion commit to change anything. All things are currently stored in one and only one repository, so every commit of every user (some 100-200 on the same repository) will trigger the pre-commit hook. So what is the best strategy to provide pre-commit hooks that will trigger only for some, but not all projects run as fast as possible, because every pre-commit hook will block all other commits. We have tried to implement pre-commit hooks with Java (using SVNKit), but this will start on every commit a Java VM. So any ideas how to implement that nicely?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191  | Next Page >