Search Results

Search found 26133 results on 1046 pages for 'asp mvc'.

Page 185/1046 | < Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >

  • MVC moq unit test the object before RedirecToAction()

    - by Daoming Yang
    I want to test the data inside the "item" object before it redirect to another action. public ActionResult WebPageEdit(WebPage item, FormCollection form) { if (ModelState.IsValid) { item.Description = Utils.CrossSiteScriptingAttackCheck(item.Description); item.Content = Utils.CrossSiteScriptingAttackCheck(item.Content); item.Title = item.Title.Trim(); item.DateUpdated = DateTime.Now; // Other logic stuff here webPagesRepository.Save(item); return RedirectToAction("WebPageList"); } Here is my Test method: [Test] public void Admin_WebPageEdit_Save() { var controller = new AdminController(); controller.webPagesRepository = DataMock.WebPageDataInit(); controller.categoriesRepository = DataMock.WebPageCategoryDataInit(); FormCollection form = DataMock.CreateWebPageFormCollection(); RedirectToRouteResult actionResult = (RedirectToRouteResult)controller.WebPageEdit(webPagesRepository.Get(1), form); Assert.IsNotNull(actionResult); Assert.AreEqual("WebPageList", actionResult.RouteValues["action"]); var item = ((ViewResult)controller.WebPageEdit(webPagesRepository.Get(1), form)).ViewData.Model as WebPage; Assert.NotNull(item); Assert.AreEqual(2, item.CategoryID); } It failed at this line: var item = ((ViewResult)controller.WebPageEdit(webPagesRepository.Get(1), form)).ViewData.Model as WebPage; I am thinking about is there any ways to test the "item" object before it redirect to other actions?

    Read the article

  • C# asp.net EF MVC postgresql error 23505: Duplicate key violates unique constraint

    - by user2721755
    EDIT: It was issue with database table - dropping and recreating table id column did the work. Problem solved. I'm trying to build web application, that is connected to postgresql database. Results are displaying in view with Kendo UI. When I'm trying to add new row (with Kendo UI 'Add new record' button), I get error 23505: 'Duplicate key violates unique constraint'. My guess is, that EF takes id to insert from the beginning, not the last one, because after 35 (it's number of rows in table) tries - and errors - adding works perfectly. Can someone help me to understand, what's wrong? Model: using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations; using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema; namespace MainConfigTest.Models { [Table("mainconfig", Schema = "public")] public class Mainconfig { [Column("id")] [Key] [Editable(false)] public int Id { get; set; } [Column("descr")] [Editable(true)] public string Descr { get; set; } [Column("hibversion")] [Required] [Editable(true)] public long Hibversion { get; set; } [Column("mckey")] [Required] [Editable(true)] public string Mckey { get; set; } [Column("valuexml")] [Editable(true)] public string Valuexml { get; set; } [Column("mcvalue")] [Editable(true)] public string Mcvalue { get; set; } } } Context: using System.Data.Entity; namespace MainConfigTest.Models { public class MainConfigContext : DbContext { public DbSet<Mainconfig> Mainconfig { get; set; } } } Controller: namespace MainConfigTest.Controllers { public class MainConfigController : Controller { #region Properties private Models.MainConfigContext db = new Models.MainConfigContext(); private string mainTitle = "Mainconfig (Kendo UI)"; #endregion #region Initialization public MainConfigController() { ViewBag.MainTitle = mainTitle; } #endregion #region Ajax [HttpGet] public JsonResult GetMainconfig() { int take = HttpContext.Request["take"] == null ? 5 : Convert.ToInt32(HttpContext.Request["take"]); int skip = HttpContext.Request["skip"] == null ? 0 : Convert.ToInt32(HttpContext.Request["skip"]); Array data = (from Models.Mainconfig c in db.Mainconfig select c).OrderBy(c => c.Id).ToArray().Skip(skip).Take(take).ToArray(); return Json(new Models.MainconfigResponse(data, db.Mainconfig.Count()), JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet); } [HttpPost] public JsonResult Create() { try { Mainconfig itemToAdd = new Mainconfig() { Descr = Convert.ToString(HttpContext.Request["Descr"]), Hibversion = Convert.ToInt64(HttpContext.Request["Hibversion"]), Mckey = Convert.ToString(HttpContext.Request["Mckey"]), Valuexml = Convert.ToString(HttpContext.Request["Valuexml"]), Mcvalue = Convert.ToString(HttpContext.Request["Mcvalue"]) }; db.Mainconfig.Add(itemToAdd); db.SaveChanges(); return Json(new { Success = true }); } catch (InvalidOperationException ex) { return Json(new { Success = false, msg = ex }); } } //other methods } } Kendo UI script in view: <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { $("#config-grid").kendoGrid({ sortable: true, pageable: true, scrollable: false, toolbar: ["create"], editable: { mode: "popup" }, dataSource: { pageSize: 5, serverPaging: true, transport: { read: { url: '@Url.Action("GetMainconfig")', dataType: "json" }, update: { url: '@Url.Action("Update")', type: "Post", dataType: "json", complete: function (e) { $("#config-grid").data("kendoGrid").dataSource.read(); } }, destroy: { url: '@Url.Action("Delete")', type: "Post", dataType: "json" }, create: { url: '@Url.Action("Create")', type: "Post", dataType: "json", complete: function (e) { $("#config-grid").data("kendoGrid").dataSource.read(); } }, }, error: function (e) { if(e.Success == false) { this.cancelChanges(); } }, schema: { data: "Data", total: "Total", model: { id: "Id", fields: { Id: { editable: false, nullable: true }, Descr: { type: "string"}, Hibversion: { type: "number", validation: {required: true,}, }, Mckey: { type: "string", validation: { required: true, }, }, Valuexml:{ type: "string"}, Mcvalue: { type: "string" } } } } }, //end DataSource // generate columns etc. Mainconfig table structure: id serial NOT NULL, descr character varying(200), hibversion bigint NOT NULL, mckey character varying(100) NOT NULL, valuexml character varying(8000), mcvalue character varying(200), CONSTRAINT mainconfig_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT mainconfig_mckey_key UNIQUE (mckey) Any help will be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 1.0: OutputCache, RenderPartial and WriteSubstitution

    - by David
    Hi folks, after digging into this topic and having the requirement, that a single page should be totally cached, except for a Html.RenderPartial("LogOnUserControl"); i couldn't find any working solution on this... the only "it getting warmer" thing i foudn was this solution , which unfortunately is not working with a "partial view", which requires the Request.IsAuthenticated attribute ( the fakeContext is losing this info ) Have you heard of any other solution to do this?!

    Read the article

  • Some questions about slugs in ASP.NET MVC content system

    - by mare
    In my application I'm currently using forms which allow to enter Title and Slug fields. Now I've been struggling with the slugs thing for a while because I can never decide once and for all how to handle them. 1) Make Title and Slug indenpendent Should I allow users to enter both Title and Slug separetely? This is what I had first. I also had an option that if user did not enter the Slug it was derived from the Title. If both were enter, the Slug field took precedence. 2) Derive Slug from Title, when content is inserted that's it for the Slug, no more changes Then, I switched to only Title field and derive Slug from title. While doing it I found out that now I have to change all the forms that allowed user to enter a slug. This way of doing it also prevents users to change Slugs - they can change the Title but it has no effect on the Slug. You can think of it like Slug is uniqued ID. 3) Now I'm thinking again of allowing users to change slug Though I don't think it is all that useful. How many times does the content that someone already added, spent time on writing it, even require a change of either Title or slug? I don't think it is that many times. The biggest problem with the 3rd option is that If I use Slugs as IDs, I need to update the reference all over the place when Slug changes. Or maintain a table that would contain somekind of Slug history. What are you thoughts on these, I hope, valid questions?

    Read the article

  • How to return model state from child action handler in ASP.NET MVC

    - by Joe Future
    In my blog engine, I have one controller action that displays blog content, and in that view, I call Html.RenderAction(...) to render the "CreateComment" form. When a user posts a comment, the post is handled by the comment controller (not the blog controller). If the comment data is valid, I simply return a Redirect back to the blog page's URL. If the comment data is invalid (e.g. comment body is empty), I want to return the ViewData with the error information back to the blog controller and through the blog view to the CreateComment action/view so I can display which fields are bad. I have this working fine via AJAX when Javascript is enabled, but now I'm working on the case where Javascript might be disabled. If I return a RedirecToAction or Redirect from the comment controller, the model state information is lost. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Handling 2 buttons submit Actions in a single View/Form - ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM

    - by Leniel Macaferi
    I have a View in which the user is able to upload a file to the server. In this view I also have 2 buttons: one to Upload a file and other to Download the last file imported. In my Controller I created 2 action methods: Import and Export. How could I manage to redirect each button click to the proper action method in my Controller? I have tried Html.ActionLink: <%= Html.ActionLink("Upload", "Import", "OracleFile")%> <%= Html.ActionLink("Download", "Export", "OracleFile")%> Html.ActionLink didn't do the trick. The action links were taking me to the right Action methods but they were generating a GET request. This way Request.Files.Count = 0. I need a POST request. Note: the most intriguing part is that the upload was working and all of sudden it stopped working. I've seen that some people are having the same problem with FileUpload tasks in which the Request.Files is always Empty. I think it's empty because you need a post to the server. Isn't it?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Routing Via Method Attributes

    - by TorgoGuy
    In the StackOverflow Podcast #54, Jeff mentions they register their URL routes in the StackOverflow codebase via an attribute above the method that handles the route. Sounds like a good concept (with the caveat that Phil Haack brought up regarding route priorities). Could someone provide some sample to to make this happen? Also, any "best practices" for using this style of routing?

    Read the article

  • Asp.net mvc 2 .net 4.0 error when View model type is Tuple with more than 4 items

    - by Bojan
    When I create strongly typed View in Asp.net mvc 2, .net 4.0 with model type Tuple I get error when Tuple have more than 4 items example 1: type of view is Tuple<string, string, string, string> (4-tuple) and everything works fine view: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/WebUI.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<Tuple<string, string, string, string>>" %> controller: var tuple = Tuple.Create("a", "b", "c", "d"); return View(tuple); example 2: type of view is Tuple<string, string, string, string, string> (5-tuple) and I have this error: Compiler Error Message: CS1003: Syntax error, '>' expected view: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/WebUI.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<Tuple<string, string, string, string, string>>" %> controller: var tuple = Tuple.Create("a", "b", "c", "d", "e"); return View(tuple); example 3 if my view model is of type dynamic I can use both 4-tuple and 5-tuple and there is no error on page view: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/WebUI.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<dynamic>" %> controller: dynamic model = new ExpandoObject(); model.tuple = Tuple.Create("a", "b", "c", "d"); return View(model); or view: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/WebUI.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<dynamic>" %> controller: dynamic model = new ExpandoObject(); model.tuple = Tuple.Create("a", "b", "c", "d", "e"); return View(model); Even if I have something like Tuple<string, Tuple<string, string, string>, string> 3-tuple and one of the items is also a tuple and sum of items in all tuples is more than 4 I get the same error, Tuple<string, Tuple<string, string>, string> works fine

    Read the article

  • Is MVC a Design Pattern or Architectural pattern

    - by JCasso
    According to Sun and Msdn it is a design pattern. According to Wikipedia it is an architectural pattern In comparison to design patterns, architectural patterns are larger in scale. (Wikipedia - Architectural pattern) Or it is an architectural pattern that also has a design pattern ? Which one is true ?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC ajax - data transfer

    - by Grienders
    How can I get result from action? I need to show the commentID on the page (aspx) after successes comment insert. controller [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post )] public ActionResult ShowArticleByAjax(Guid id, string commentBody) { Guid commentID = Comment.InsertComment(id, commentBody); //How can I tranfer commentID to the aspx page ??? return PartialView("CommentDetails",Article.GetArticleByID(id)); } ascx <%using (Ajax.BeginForm("ShowArticleByAjax", new { id = Model.ID }, new AjaxOptions { HttpMethod = "Post", UpdateTargetId = "divCommentDetails", OnSuccess = "successAddComment", OnFailure = "failureAddComment", OnBegin = "beginAddComment" })) { %> <p> <%=Html.TextArea("commentBody", new { cols = "100%", rows = "10" })%> </p> <p> <input name="submit" type="image" src="../../Content/Images/Design/button_s.gif" id="submit" /> </p> <%} %> aspx doesn't matter

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC POST Parameter into RouteData

    - by David Thomas Garcia
    I'm using jQuery to POST an Id to my route, for example: http://localhost:1234/Load/Delete with a POST Parameter Id = 1 I'm only using the default route in Global.asax.cs right now: routes.MapRoute( "Default", "{controller}/{action}/{id}", new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" } ); When I perform the POST, in my ActionFilter filterContext.RouteData.Values["Id"] is set to the default value of "". Ideally, I'd like it to use the POST Parameter value automatically if the URL comes up with "". I know it is posting properly because I can see the value of "1" in filterContext.HttpContext.Request.Params["Id"]. Is there a way to get RouteData to use a POST parameter as a fall back value?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Consume JSONResult in Bing Maps API

    - by rockinthesixstring
    I know there are a few topics on this, but I seem to be fumbling my way through with no results. I'm trying to use a controller to return JSON results to my Bin Maps functions. Here's what I have for my controller (yes it is properly returning JSON data. Function Regions() As JsonResult Dim rj As New List(Of RtnJson)() rj.Add(New RtnJson("135 Bow Meadows Drive, Cochrane, Alberta", "desc", "title")) rj.Add(New RtnJson("12 Bowridge Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada", "desc2", "title2")) Return Json(rj, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet) End Function Then in my script I have this, but it's not working. <script type="text/javascript"> var map = null; var centerLat = 51.045 ; var centerLon = -114.05722; var json_object = $.getJSON("<%: Url.Action("Regions", "Events")%>"); function LoadMap() { map = new VEMap('bingMap'); map.LoadMap(new VELatLong(centerLat, centerLon), 10); $.each(json_object, function () { alert(this.address); //this alert is returning "address is undefined" StartGeocoding(this.address, this.title, this.desc); }); } function StartGeocoding(address, title, desc) { map.Find(null, // what address, // where null, // VEFindType (always VEFindType.Businesses) null, // VEShapeLayer (base by default) null, // start index for results (0 by default) null, // max number of results (default is 10) null, // show results? (default is true) null, // create pushpin for what results? (ignored since what is null) true, // use default disambiguation? (default is true) false, // set best map view? (default is true) GeocodeCallback); // call back function } function GeocodeCallback(shapeLayer, findResults, places, moreResults, errorMsg) { var bestPlace = places[0]; // Add pushpin to the *best* place var location = bestPlace.LatLong; var newShape = new VEShape(VEShapeType.Pushpin, location); var desc = "Latitude: " + location.Latitude + "<br>Longitude:" + location.Longitude; newShape.SetDescription(desc); newShape.SetTitle(bestPlace.Name); map.AddShape(newShape); } $(document).ready(function () { LoadMap(); }); </script>

    Read the article

  • MVC Html.textbox/dropdown/whatever won't refresh on postback

    - by Cynthia
    OK, let's start with the Html.Textbox. It is supposed to contain text read from a file. The file read is based on what the user picks from a dropdown list. The first time it is fine. The user picks a value from the dropdown list. The controller uses that value to read some text from a file, and returns that text to the view via the view model. Everything is fine. THen the user picks another value from the dropdown list. The controller reads a new value from a file and returns it via the view model. Debugging to the LINE BEFORE THE HTML.TEXTBOX is set in the view shows that the model contains the correct value. However, the textbox itself still shows the PREVIOUS value when the page displays! If I switch from Html.Textbox to a plain input, type="text" html control, everything works fine. That's not so hard, but the same thing happens with my dropdown list -- I can't set the selected value in code. It always reverts to whatever was chosen last. Rendering a "select" tag with a dynamically-generated option list is a pain. I would love to be able to use Html.Dropdown. What am I missing here?? This is such a simple thing in webforms!

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net Mvc JQuery ajax input parameters are null

    - by Dofs
    Hi, I am trying to post some data with jQuery Ajax, but the parameters in my Ajax method are null. This is simple test to send data: var dataPost = { titel: 'titel', message: 'msg', tagIds: 'hello' }; jQuery.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "Create", contentType: 'application/json; charset=utf-8', data: $.toJSON(dataPost), dataType: "json", success: function(result) { alert("Data Returned: "); } }); And my Ajax method looks like this: [HttpPost] public ActionResult Create(string title, string message, string tagIds) {... } There is something basic wrong with the data I send, but I can't figure out what. All the time the title, message and tagIds are null, so there is something wrong with the encoding, I just don't know what. Note: The jQuery.toJSON is this plugin

    Read the article

  • Any one like me who still believes in AspNet Web forms? Or has evryone switched to MVC

    - by The_AlienCoder
    After years mastering Aspnet webforms I recently decided to try out ASpnet MVC. Naturally my first action was to google 'Aspnet webforms vs Aspnet MVC'. I hoped to get an honest comparison of the two development techniques and guidelines on when to use which one. ..But I was completely turned off by the MVC proponents. In almost every post on the net comparing the two 'platforms' the MVC camp is simply bashing webform developers like me. They go on and on about how wrong and stupid using webforms is. As if what we have been doing the past decade has been pointless - all those websites built(& still running), all those clever controls, the mighty gridview..ALL POINTLESS ! Karl Seguin especially with his stupid webforms rant really turned me off. If his intention was to convert people like me he did the oposite and made me defensive. If anything I am now convinced that the webforms approach is better. consider the following All the critical shortcomings of aspnet webforms have now been Addressed in visual studio 2010 with Aspnet 4.0.- Cleaner html, cleaner control IDs, friendly urls, leaner viewstate etc Why would any one want to implement the mighty gridview and other wonderful controls from scratch ? In MVC you have to do this yourself because ABSTRACTION IS PLAIN STUPID- Instead of writing loops why not just code using 1s and 0s then? A stateless web is a WEAKNESS so why would anyone want to get rid of viewstate? Everyone would like a better implementation but getting rid of it is a step backwards not forward. Unit testing is great but not a critical requirement for most web projects. I thought inline codes were dead with asp. But now they are back and fashionable - Thanks to MVC. I dont know about you people but codebehind was REVOLUTIONARY. Ive had the Ajax Update panel do so many wonderful things without writing a line of code so why demonise it? Ive succesfully implemented a chat client, IM client and Status bar using nothing but the update panel and script manager.Ofcourse you cant use it for everything but most of the time its appropriate. And finally the last word from JQUERY - 'Write less do more !' - That's what webforms is all about ! So Am I the only who still believes in webforms(and it getting better as Aspnet 4.0 has shown) or will it be dead and gone a few years from now like asp? I mean if inline coding is 'the future' why not just switch to PHP !

    Read the article

  • Posting a form and redirecting to action ASP.NET MVC

    - by dean nolan
    I have a navigation bar that uses JQuery to move between 4 stages of signup process. However I need to make sure everything is working with JS disabled. So I have these 4 link images at the bottom of the page and I need so that if one is clicked it posts to the current action so I can save all the form data and then redirect to the next stage. The redirect is easy enough as I will just pass a parameter in the route or form but I don't know how to post the method using just action links. I could put 4 different submit buttons with different classes for the image backgrounds etc but this feels wrong. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Spring MVC defaultValue for Double

    - by mlathe
    Hi All, I'm trying to build a controller like this: @RequestMapping(method = {RequestMethod.GET}, value = "/users/detail/activities.do") public View foo(@RequestParam(value = "userCash", defaultValue="0.0") Double userCash) { System.out.println("foo userCash=" + userCash); } This works fine: http://localhost/app/users/detail/activities.do?userCash=123& but in this one userCash==null despite the default value http://localhost/app/users/detail/activities.do?userCash=& From some digging it seems like the first one works b/c of a Editor binding like this: binder.registerCustomEditor(Double.class, new CustomNumberEditor(Double.class, false)); The trouble is that the second param (ie false) defines whether blank values are allowed. If i set that to true, than the system considers the blank input as valid so i get a null Double class. If i set it to false then the system chokes on the blank input string with: org.springframework.beans.TypeMismatchException: Failed to convert value of type 'java.lang.String' to required type 'double'; nested exception is java.lang.NumberFormatException: empty String Does anyone know how to get the defaultValue to work for Doubles? Thanks --Matthias

    Read the article

  • how to relaod jqgrid in asp.net mvc when i change dropdownlist

    - by sandeep
    what is wrong in this code? when i change drop down list,the grid takes old value of ddl only, not taken newely selected values why? <%-- $(function() { $("#StateId").change(function() { $('#TheForm').submit(); }); }); $(function() { $("#CityId").change(function() { $('#TheForm').submit(); }); }); $(function() { $("#HospitalName").change(function() { $('#TheForm').submit(); }); }); --% var gridimgpath = '/scripts/themes/coffee/images'; var gridDataUrl = '/Claim/DynamicGridData/'; jQuery(document).ready(function() { // $("#btnSearch").click(function() { var StateId = document.getElementById('StateId').value; var CityId = document.getElementById('CityId').value; var HName = document.getElementById('HospitalName').value; // alert(CityId); // alert(StateId); // alert(HName); if (StateId 0 && CityId == '' && HName == '') { CityId = 0; HName = 'Default'.toString(); // alert("elseif0" + HName.toString()); } else if (CityId 0 && StateId == '') { // alert("elseif1"); alert("Please Select State..") } else if (CityId 0 && StateId 0 && HName == '') { // alert("elseif2"); alert(CityId); alert(StateId); HName = "Default"; } else { // alert("else"); StateId = 0; CityId = 0; HName = "Default"; } jQuery("#list").jqGrid({ url: gridDataUrl + '?StateId=' + StateId + '&CityId=' + CityId + '&hospname=' + HName, datatype: 'json', mtype: 'GET', colNames: ['Id', 'HospitalName', 'Address', 'City', 'District', 'FaxNumber', 'PhoneNumber'], colModel: [{ name: 'HospitalId', index: 'HospitalId', width: 40, align: 'left' }, { name: 'HospitalName', index: 'HospitalName', width: 40, align: 'left' }, { name: 'Address1', Address: 'Address1', width: 300 }, { name: 'CityName', index: 'CityName', width: 100 }, { name: 'DistName', index: 'DistName', width: 100 }, { name: 'FaxNo', index: 'FaxNo', width: 100 }, { name: 'ContactNo1', index: 'PhoneNumber', width: 100 } ], pager: jQuery('#pager'), rowNum: 10, rowList: [5, 10, 20, 50], // sortname: 'Id,', sortname: '1', sortorder: "asc", viewrecords: true, //multiselect: true, //multikey: "ctrlKey", // imgpath: '/scripts/themes/coffee/images', imgpath: gridimgpath, caption: 'Hospital Search', width: 700, height: 250 }); $(function() { // $("#btnSearch").click(function() { $('#CityId').change(function() { alert("kjasd"); // Set the vars whenever the date range changes and then filter the results StateId = document.getElementById('StateId').value; CityId = document.getElementById('CityId').value; HName = 'default'; setGridUrl(); }); // Set the date range textbox values $('#StateId').val(StateId.toString()); $('#CityId').val(CityId.toString()); // Set the grid json url to get the data to display setGridUrl(); }); function setGridUrl() { alert(StateId); alert(CityId); alert("hi"); var newGridDataUrl = gridDataUrl + '?StateId=' + StateId + '&CityId=' + CityId + '&hospname=' + HName; jQuery('#list').jqGrid('setGridParam', { url: newGridDataUrl }).trigger("reloadGrid"); } // }); }); <%--<%using (Html.BeginForm("HospitalSearch", "Claim", FormMethod.Post, new { id = "TheForm" })) --% Hospital Search   State :   City :   Hospital Name :       <div id="jqGridContainer"> <table id="list" class="scroll" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"></table> </div>

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net MVC 2: How to keep values in the model between posts

    - by Andreas
    I have an edit view that is displaying some model properties as plain text and other model properties as input fields. My problem is that the model properties displayed as plain text are null when the model is returned to the view after a validation error. How do I retain the model values when I don't have input fields for all properties? What is best practice? My first thought is to keep the values of these properties in hidden input elements. <%= Html.HiddenFor(model => model.CustomerName) %> Is this considered a correct solution? Thanks Andreas

    Read the article

  • Factory pattern vs ease-of-use?

    - by Curtis White
    Background, I am extending the ASP.NET Membership with custom classes and extra tables. The ASP.NET MembershipUser has a protected constructor and a public method to read the data from the database. I have extended the database structure with custom tables and associated classes. Instead of using a static method to create a new member, as in the original API: I allow the code to instantiate a simple object and fill the data because there are several entities. Original Pattern #1 Protected constructor > static CreateUser(string mydata, string, mydata, ...) > User.Data = mydata; > User.Update() My Preferred Pattern #2 Public constructor > newUser = new MembershipUser(); > newUser.data = ... > newUser.ComplextObject.Data = ... > newUser.Insert() > newUser.Load(string key) I find pattern #2 to be easier and more natural to use. But method #1 is more atomic and ensured to contain proper data. I'd like to hear any opinions on pros/cons. The problem in my mind is that I prefer a simple CRUD/object but I am, also, trying to utilize the underlying API. These methods do not match completely. For example, the API has methods, like UnlockUser() and a readonly property for the IsLockedOut

    Read the article

  • How to show validation messages in MVC?

    - by Ian Boyd
    When a user tries to click:        Save and they have entered in some invalid data, i want to notify them. This can be with methods such as: directing their attention to the thing that needs their attention with a balloon hint automatically dropping down a combo-box triggering an animation showing a modal dialog box etc What is the mechanism where a controller tells the view to show a validation message for some controls, given that different views have different notification methods? p.s. the controller doesn't know the order that controls are physically arranged in the view (e.g. LTR locale wants to notify the user in a top-down-left-to-right visual order, while RTL locale wants to notify the user in a bottom-up-right-to-left order)

    Read the article

  • Spring MVC Web PetClinic Tutorial?

    - by wuntee
    Is there a tutorial that goes along with the PetClinic application? I have been trying to find one, but google is not helping me today. Specifically, I dont understand things like: @Autowired - what does that even mean? @RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET) public String setupForm(@RequestParam("petId") int petId, ModelMap model) { Pet pet = this.clinic.loadPet(petId); model.addAttribute("pet", pet); return "petForm"; } How can a request return just a string? Shouldnt it need to return some sort of ModelAndView? Or does the application somehow redirect to whatever is returned? A lot of confusing concepts - if there is a tutorial, or video (like spring-security has) that would be very helpful. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC - Localization route

    - by ropstah
    Hi, i'd like to create localized URL's for my site. They should obviously point to the same controller actions, but I want the first routevalues to -always- be the location/language specification. Is this possible? http://www.website.com/en/us/controller/action http://www.website.com/en/gb/controller/action I understand it can be done by defining {language} and {location} in every route, but i'm looking for a slick, non-hacky solution.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >