Search Results

Search found 8144 results on 326 pages for 'thread'.

Page 185/326 | < Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >

  • Rss feed for game programmer?

    - by simpleblob
    I was browsing this thread, which has good recommendation but a bit too general for me. So, if anyone has a collection of nice game programming feeds,please share them. :) (both general and specific topics are welcome)

    Read the article

  • implement multithreading

    - by Neo
    how to to implement multithreading where one thread updating UI and other one is reading the database record in windows application Any guidelines really appreciated...

    Read the article

  • Debugging asp.net suddenly stops

    - by Lieven Cardoen
    I have a strange error. I'm debugging an asp.net site and suddenly it stops. Visual Studio stays in debug mode and my web application stays on running just fine. I found this post on, but I don't think a background thread is causing the problem. There's even a try catch around the code where it usually stops debugging, but the catch is not triggered... Everytime I try it, it stops at a different place in the code.

    Read the article

  • background worker window controls not rendered

    - by senthil
    Is there any way to load window inside the background worker thread without using showdialog()? the background worker only terminate only after getting some input from the window. Here the issue is window shown but the button and other controls are not rendered even we don't have control over any of the window.

    Read the article

  • Missing $ on loop variable

    - by k0re
    Hi, 1 #!/usr/bin/perl 2 use strict; 3 use warnings; 4 5 my @array = qw[a b c]; 6 foreach my($a,$b,$c) (@array) { 7 print "$a , $b , $c\n"; 8 } I receive following error: Missing $ on loop variable What is wrong? I am using: perl v5.10.1 (*) built for x86_64-linux-thread-multi

    Read the article

  • Prompting for user confirmation before upgrading previous version

    - by bizmark
    Using WiX, we would like to be able to uninstall a previous version if it is already installed. I am able to do this automatically based on the thread here. But how does one go about prompting the user if they actually want to uninstall the old version first, before running the RemoveExistingProducts action? ie. through a custom menu item that only launches if FindRelatedProducts returns 1, for example?

    Read the article

  • Locking individual elements in a static collection?

    - by user638474
    I have a static collection of objects that will be frequently updated from multiple threads. Is it possible to lock individual objects in a collection instead of locking the entire collection so that only threads trying to access the same object in the collection would get blocked instead of every thread? If there is a better way to update objects in a collection from multiple threads, I'm all ears.

    Read the article

  • A question about making a C# class persistant during a file load

    - by Adam
    Apologies for the indescriptive title, however it's the best I could think of for the moment. Basically, I've written a singleton class that loads files into a database. These files are typically large, and take hours to process. What I am looking for is to make a method where I can have this class running, and be able to call methods from within it, even if it's calling class is shut down. The singleton class is simple. It starts a thread that loads the file into the database, while having methods to report on the current status. In a nutshell it's al little like this: public sealed class BulkFileLoader { static BulkFileLoader instance = null; int currentCount = 0; BulkFileLoader() public static BulkFileLoader Instance { // Instanciate the instance class if necessary, and return it } public void Go() { // kick of 'ProcessFile' thread } public void GetCurrentCount() { return currentCount; } private void ProcessFile() { while (more rows in the import file) { // insert the row into the database currentCount++; } } } The idea is that you can get an instance of BulkFileLoader to execute, which will process a file to load, while at any time you can get realtime updates on the number of rows its done so far using the GetCurrentCount() method. This works fine, except the calling class needs to stay open the whole time for the processing to continue. As soon as I stop the calling class, the BulkFileLoader instance is removed, and it stops processing the file. What I am after is a solution where it will continue to run independently, regardless of what happens to the calling class. I then tried another approach. I created a simple console application that kicks off the BulkFileLoader, and then wrapped it around as a process. This fixes one problem, since now when I kick off the process, the file will continue to load even if I close the class that called the process. However, now the problem I have is that cannot get updates on the current count, since if I try and get the instance of BulkFileLoader (which, as mentioned before is a singleton), it creates a new instance, rather than returning the instance that is currently in the executing process. It would appear that singletons don't extend into the scope of other processes running on the machine. In the end, I want to be able to kick off the BulkFileLoader, and at any time be able to find out how many rows it's processed. However, that is even if I close the application I used to start it. Can anyone see a solution to my problem?

    Read the article

  • How to implement a timer callback that executes in the same execution context

    - by Waldorf
    Some programming environments like C++ builder have timer components with a callback function which executes in the same execution contexts as where the timer object is created. I was wondering how to do something similar in plain c++ with threading. Or are there any other ways to have a callback which is periodically called to perform some task and runs in the same execution context as the calling thread?

    Read the article

  • Threading in C#

    - by j-t-s
    Hi All Just looking for something ultra simple. I need to spawn a method off to a new thread. I don't care when or how it ends. Can somebody please help me with this? Thank you

    Read the article

  • When to Multithread and when not to Multithread c++ applications?

    - by Ashwin
    I have been in an assumption that multithreading gives a lot of flexibility and power to make efficient programs. But I am wrong. Multithreading is sometimes not desirable as it will create serious impact on the way the actual program behaves. My question? I am not sure of when to use and when not to use multithreads in applications. Please update this thread and give your opinions on multithreading and suggestions on its usage scenarios.

    Read the article

  • Grails - how to save a domain object inside a Service ?

    - by w-
    I have a service and inside one of the functions i'm creating a domain object and trying to save it. when it gets to the save part, i get the error No Hibernate Session bound to thread, and configuration does not allow creation of non-transactional one here What do i need to do in order to save a domain object inside of a service. everything on the internet makes it look like this should just work....

    Read the article

  • How do I find the list of functions executed to build a page?

    - by ashy_32bit
    I want the list of all functions executed to a certain point in code, somehow like debug_backtrace() but including functions not in the exact thread that leads to where debug_backtrace() is called. e.g : a(); function a() { b(); c(); d(); } function b() { } function c() { } function d() { print all_trace(); } would produce : a(), b(), c(), d() and not a(), d() like debug_backtrace() would

    Read the article

  • how to cancel an awaiting task c#

    - by user1748906
    I am trying to cancel a task awaiting for network IO using CancellationTokenSource, but I have to wait until TcpClient connects: try { while (true) { token.Token.ThrowIfCancellationRequested(); Thread.Sleep(int.MaxValue); //simulating a TcpListener waiting for request } } any ideas ? Secondly, is it OK to start each client in a separate task ?

    Read the article

  • iPhone dev: Get keys (public / private)

    - by Jonny
    I'm using another computer than normal to do iPhone dev. Now I'm trying to get my apps onto my iPhone, but fail with the certificates, keys and stuff. Refer to this thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/613719/iphone-provisioning-problem-public-private-key Actually I'm able to download my cert no problem from Apple's site, but how would I get at the keys needed? (private, public), I see no way of getting them...

    Read the article

  • Multithreaded ActiveRecord requests in rspec

    - by jeem
    I'm trying to recreate a race condition in a test, so I can try out some solutions. I find that in the threads I create in my test, ActiveRecord always returns 0 for counts and nil for finds. For example, with 3 rows in the table "foos": it "whatever" do puts Foo.count 5.times do Thread.new do puts Foo.count end end end will print 3 0 0 0 0 0 test.log shows the expected query, the expected 6 times: SELECT count(*) AS count_all FROM `active_agents` Any idea what's going on here?

    Read the article

  • reading txt storing in different

    - by dev2
    ASp.NET application. In button click i am accessing one text file and reading content and storing in other destination. while both users clicking this button at a time deadlock(thread is being used by other process) will occurs so how to handle this i want to read each user one by one can any one suggest method to handle. i am looking to handle with waithandle events so can any one give a code sample for above scenario.

    Read the article

  • Multi-Dimensional Array and ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

    - by notset
    Hello, I have a strange problem which I can't fix: A field: private boolean[][][] gaps; Constructor (1st line): gaps = new boolean[NOBARRICADES][WIDTH][HEIGHT]; Constructor (2nd line): for (int i = 0; i < NOBARRICADES; i++) { JAVA throws an error for the 2nd line, saying: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException Does it have anything to do with JAVA syntax (the mistake is in these lines of code) or I should look for the problem somewhere else?

    Read the article

  • Updating table from async task android

    - by CantChooseUsernames
    I'm following this tutorial: http://huuah.com/android-progress-bar-and-thread-updating/ to learn how to make progress bars. I'm trying to show the progress bar on top of my activity and have it update the activity's table view in the background. So I created an async task for the dialog that takes a callback: package com.lib.bookworm; import android.app.ProgressDialog; import android.content.Context; import android.os.AsyncTask; public class UIThreadProgress extends AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> { private UIThreadCallback callback = null; private ProgressDialog dialog = null; private int maxValue = 100, incAmount = 1; private Context context = null; public UIThreadProgress(Context context, UIThreadCallback callback) { this.context = context; this.callback = callback; } @Override protected Void doInBackground(Void... args) { while(this.callback.condition()) { this.callback.run(); this.publishProgress(); } return null; } @Override protected void onProgressUpdate(Void... values) { super.onProgressUpdate(values); dialog.incrementProgressBy(incAmount); }; @Override protected void onPreExecute() { super.onPreExecute(); dialog = new ProgressDialog(context); dialog.setCancelable(true); dialog.setMessage("Loading..."); dialog.setProgress(0); dialog.setProgressStyle(ProgressDialog.STYLE_HORIZONTAL); dialog.setMax(maxValue); dialog.show(); } @Override protected void onPostExecute(Void result) { super.onPostExecute(result); if (this.dialog.isShowing()) { this.dialog.dismiss(); } this.callback.onThreadFinish(); } } And in my activity, I do: final String page = htmlPage.substring(start, end).trim(); //Create new instance of the AsyncTask.. new UIThreadProgress(this, new UIThreadCallback() { @Override public void run() { row_id = makeTableRow(row_id, layout, params, matcher); //ADD a row to the table layout. } @Override public void onThreadFinish() { System.out.println("FINISHED!!"); } @Override public boolean condition() { return matcher.find(); } }).execute(); So the above creates an async task to run to update a table layout activity while showing the progress bar that displays how much work has been done.. However, I get an error saying that only the thread that started the activity can update its views. I tried doing: MainActivity.this.runOnUiThread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { row_id = makeTableRow(row_id, layout, params, matcher); //ADD a row to the table layout. } } But this gives me synchronization errors.. Any ideas how I can display progress and at the same time update my table in the background? Currently my UI looks like:

    Read the article

  • Android segmented downloading

    - by xRev
    I'm still new to Android, so, I'm still not so familiar with its libraries and APIs. My first major project is a download manager which supports segmented downloading. I could already download files, but, I still have no idea on how or where to start for segmented downloading. I have already browsed a lot of threads, but I really couldn't find any article or thread about segmented downloading in Android. Can anyone please help me?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >