Search Results

Search found 9658 results on 387 pages for 'authentication provider'.

Page 187/387 | < Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >

  • samba 3.5 "force user" doesn't seem to be sticking

    - by myCubeIsMyCell
    After installing a new OS with newer version of samba, I'm having trouble accessing my shares. I can browse to the specific share, but only to the top level. As best I can tell from the logs, it seems the "force user" in the samba config isn't sticking beyond the initial connection. Details below. I installed a new version of CentOS on my storage server. My old CentOS (4?)install had samba version 3.0.33, new CentOS is using 3.5.10. No domain/AD involved ... just home workgroup. no real security... just some shares hidden & some defined as read-only. here's my config: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = Samba Server Version %v netbios name = luna security = share # logs split per machine log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 2 # max 50KB per log file, then rotate max log size = 50 winbind use default domain = Yes [strge] comment = please path = /storage browseable = yes read only = no force user = windowsguest force group = users guest ok = yes So... the problem I'm running into is that the 'force user' only seems to hold for the initial connection & I see all the top level folders fine. When I drill into a folder I get access denied - which appears to be due to my windows user info being sent (trys to authenticate xuser - a non-existant user to samba, so maps to nobody & fails). Here's the smb error msg: [2012/11/29 14:30:27.326195, 2] auth/auth.c:314(check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [xuser] -> [xuser] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2012/11/29 14:30:27.326251, 2] auth/auth.c:314(check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [nobody] -> [nobody] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER Most of the top level directories are 755, some 777. Either way, can not access them. If I do a chown -R windowsguest.users ... no change... but if I do a chmod -R to 777 or 755 they become browsable... but still can't create files (even for 777 ones). Not sure what role it plays if any... but had to recreate the user windowsguest under the new os install, uid & gid match old user. Seems the main issue as far as I can tell is that samba isn't maintaining the 'force user' - but I could be wildly off base. Client OS is win7 pro x64. Thanks for any suggestions or advice!

    Read the article

  • linux centos 5.6 someone installed irc

    - by Peter
    I need some help, my server provider contacted me to tell me my server was using 200mbit/s bandwidth. Upon investigation I found processes for a user that should not be there.. I found processes as follows: 26269 511 Nov27 ./stealth 58.22.68.253 53 775 511 Oct12 ./eggdrop -m botnick.conf I know eggdrop is IRC, my question is, where can I find out where the software has been installed for these processes?

    Read the article

  • JDBCRealm can't find sqlite file

    - by Tom A
    My authentication fails with java.sql.SQLException: no such table: credentials where credentials is the name of the user/password table. I have checked the db file and the table is there. I think you also get this error when sqlite jdbc can't even find the file. I am specifying my realm in a META-INF/context.xml file. Is there any trick to getting the path right? I have tried just about everything I can think of.

    Read the article

  • Add google.ie to IE9

    - by user104752
    After recently reinstalling windows I now find that iegallery does not offer the create your own search provider any more - get a 404 if you use the old link. So how can I add google.ie to IE9, only options searching iegallery are .com, .co.uk but no .ie TIA edit had a brainwave to search the registry and found the entry for it. HKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwareMicrosoftInternet ExplorerSearch Scopes and find the entry for the google search url

    Read the article

  • Set Default 404 error pages across entire instance of IIS

    - by user125264
    we are currently using IIS 8 on our new windows VPS. We have a content management system we install for all our apps we build, but we are finding it incredibly painful as our hosting provider requires that we change the default 404 error page from the default settings everytime we create a site. Is there an easy way within IIS to automatically apply this same default directory within each website so we dont need to edit it on every website we build ? thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • What are the differences between google app mail, and plain ol' [email protected] forwarding to gmail ac

    - by Chris Adams
    I currently have an email address, [email protected], that I currently use to forward to a gmail account that I've used for years. I currently have it set, so I can send email from my [email protected] instead of [email protected]. This is done through the web ui on my current domain name, provider, gandi.net. What are the main differences between this arrangement, and setting up a Google Apps for your domain setup, where I'm explicitly listing in the dns records to point records to point to Google's app mail server?

    Read the article

  • What are the differences between google app mail, and plain ol' [email protected] forwarding to gmail ac

    - by Chris Adams
    I currently have an email address, [email protected], that I currently use to forward to a gmail account that I've used for years. I currently have it set, so I can send email from my [email protected] instead of [email protected]. This is done through the web ui on my current domain name, provider, gandi.net. What are the main differences between this arrangement, and setting up a Google Apps for your domain setup, where I'm explicitly listing in the dns records to point records to point to Google's app mail server?

    Read the article

  • Where is the plugins directory for Turnkey Trac?

    - by Tomek
    Hello, I setup a Turnkey Trac virtual machine and am trying to set up the LdapPlugin to use use authentication through a local Active Directory. I tried using easy_install http://trac-hacks.org/svn/ldapplugin/ to install it and it claimed to have completed, however when I go to the Admin page and go to plugins, it is not listed. I have never setup a Turnkey server like this before and was wondering in which directory the Trac plugins are located on the Turnkey-linux machine? Thanks, Tomek

    Read the article

  • OpenSSH does not accept public key?

    - by Bob
    I've been trying to solve this for a while, but I'm admittedly quite stumped. I just started up a new server and was setting up OpenSSH to use key-based SSH logins, but I've run into quite a dilemma. All the guides are relatively similar, and I was following them closely (despite having done this once before). I triple checked my work to see if I would notice some obvious screw up - but nothing is apparent. As far as I can tell, I haven't done anything wrong (and I've checked very closely). If it's any help, on my end I'm using Cygwin and the server is running Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS. Anyways, here is the output (I've removed/censored some parts for privacy (primarily anything with my name, website, or its IP address), but I can assure you that nothing is wrong there): $ ssh user@host -v OpenSSH_5.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011 debug1: Connecting to host [ipaddress] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.9 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY debug1: Server host key: ECDSA 24:68:c3:d8:13:f8:61:94:f2:95:34:d1:e2:6d:e7:d7 debug1: Host 'host' is known and matches the ECDSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/user/.ssh/known_hosts:2 debug1: ssh_ecdsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: Roaming not allowed by server debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey). What can I do to resolve my problem?

    Read the article

  • STARTTLS issues with sendmail

    - by Jim
    I just switch hosts and now have to configure sendmail with certificates in order to send mail. Is there anyone here that can point me to some solid documentation that is known to work? I'm on CentOS, using sendmail 8.13. I am currently trying to figure out why I am getting "Relaying denied. Proper authentication required". I'd be happy to post my mc file if someone thinks thay can help..

    Read the article

  • Valid certificate issued by certificate authority

    - by Null
    Using the below configuration: internal Domain: company.corp Server 2008 DC and CA I've setup Radius/NPS for WPA2-Enterprise authentication, but the mobile clients are getting certificate warnings because the PEAP certificate is self signed by the CA. How can I fix the warning? Do I need to get a signed certificate for the company.corp domain?

    Read the article

  • How to get permission to create full-text index?

    - by Bill Paetzke
    I tried to create a full-text index and got this error: Msg 9967, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 A default full-text catalog does not exist in database 'foo' or user does not have permission to perform this action. FYI--I connected to the target sql server with Windows Authentication. What do I need to do in Sql Server 2005 and/or in Windows Server 2003 to get permissions? Please be thorough (assume I am a n00b). Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Networked filesystem with user level security for linux

    - by Konrads
    Hi, I want to enable file sharing between servers and clients, both linux. I don't want to rely on machine trust like in NFSv4 because client users will have root privileges. What are my options besides SMB (SAMBA)? Does OpenAFS support user level authentication & access? Using mounted WebDAV/ftp/sshfs seems silly for LAN.

    Read the article

  • Email been marked as spam

    - by Rodrigo Ferrari
    Hello friends! Friends, I tried a lot of changes, but no success to send the email correctly formated, I'm using the same domain to send mail and the email pass trough spf and authentication, but has been marked as spam for some accounts using gmail ou google app's. The header's are: Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.231.208.5 with SMTP id ga5cs194453ibb; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.213.18 with SMTP id l18mr4141524wfg.192.1295291312735; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from hm1315-29.locaweb.com.br (hm1315-29.locaweb.com.br [201.76.49.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a70si8528144yhd.33.2011.01.17.11.08.32; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 201.76.49.185 as permitted sender) client-ip=201.76.49.185; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 201.76.49.185 as permitted sender) [email protected] Received: from hm1974.locaweb.com.br (189.126.112.86) by hm1315-38.locaweb.com.br (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r15) id h6i9r00nvfo8 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 (envelope-from <[email protected]>) X-Spam-Status: No Received: from bart0020.locaweb.com.br (bart0020.email.locaweb.com.br [200.234.210.22]) by hm1974.locaweb.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C03511E00B5; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 (BRST) X-LocaWeb-COR: locaweb_2009_x-mail Received: from admin.domain.com.br (hm686.locaweb.com.br [200.234.200.116]) (Authenticated sender: [email protected]) by bart0020.locaweb.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B2F08CAFD6B; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 (BRST) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 Subject: Domain - Assunto From: Sistema <[email protected]> Reply-To: rodrigo <[email protected]> To: balucia <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at hm1974 X-Virus-Status: Clean This header has been marked as spam, I had no more ideas how to fix it and there are people borrowing me about this. Thanks and best regard's.

    Read the article

  • proxy software to relay email

    - by Registered User
    My some software applications need to relay emails to my email account. The only way they can do it via connecting to localhost which relays mail on behalf of application. I have forgotten the name of such a software it is a Debian/Ubuntu environment. Can any one let me know the name of such an proxy software which relays mail to your local SMTP server on behalf of application I will need to enter username password also in this setting because the mail server needs authentication.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Moved Active Directory Domain

    - by Ollie
    I have changed the AD domain on a SQL Server 2008 box which was setup only for Windows Authentication. Now the domain has changed, I can't log into the SQL Server instance even as the domain's Administrator account. Is there a way of updating the server security settings without logging into the SQL instance first through a command switch / registry setting / etc..

    Read the article

  • Issues while installing no machine setup (NX )

    - by TopCoder
    I am trying to connect to NX server from windows client but it reports following exception NX 203 NXSSH running with pid: 5404 NX 285 Enabling check on switch command NX 285 Enabling skip of SSH config files NX 285 Setting the preferred NX options NX 200 Connected to address: 10.43.51.77 on port: 22 NX 202 Authenticating user: nx NX 208 Using auth method: publickey NX 204 Authentication failed. I have regenearted the default_dsa.key on server and imported the same for client but still not working. Any solutions?

    Read the article

  • LDAP NTLM interop [closed]

    - by pihentagy
    Hi! Our company uses NTLM to authenticate users. But there are a bunch of softwares with LDAP authentication support. So, is there a way to setup an LDAP server (preferably under WinNT), which can authenticate users via NTLM?

    Read the article

  • Debian: Disable software Raid?

    - by DebFo
    Hey, I own a server with 2 hdds and I used a debian raid installation template. Know I want to reinstall my server and don't want raid anymore to have more space. My provider wants money to change the template to a non-raid debian one. Is there a way to disable software raid on linux after a fresh installation? Thanks

    Read the article

  • User given a login prompt when closing Word documents after viewing them in IE7

    - by Martin Owen
    When using IE7 to view Word documents on our CRM system (an ASP.NET 2.0 application running on Windows Server 2003 and IIS 6 and using Windows authenticaton) I'm finding that a prompt appears when the user closes the document. The Word document is originally opened by clicking a link in the CRM system. Are there permissions that I can set on the folder containing the Word documents to prevent this prompt? I've already tried only allowing the Read permission for the Users group (I've left Administrators with Full Control.) If there's another solution to this without using permissions please let me know. UPDATE: I ran Fiddler as suggested by JD and here is the output from the two responses after the request for the document. The first seems to be a DAV response and the second is the authentication request. How do I prevent the DAV response and just return the .doc on the server? OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1 Translate: f User-Agent: Microsoft Data Access Internet Publishing Provider Protocol Discovery Host: <REMOVED> Content-Length: 0 Connection: Keep-Alive Pragma: no-cache X-NovINet: v1.2 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:37:36 GMT Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET MS-Author-Via: DAV Content-Length: 0 Accept-Ranges: none DASL: <DAV:sql> DAV: 1, 2 Public: OPTIONS, TRACE, GET, HEAD, DELETE, PUT, POST, COPY, MOVE, MKCOL, PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, LOCK, UNLOCK, SEARCH Allow: OPTIONS, TRACE, GET, HEAD, COPY, PROPFIND, SEARCH, LOCK, UNLOCK Cache-Control: private ------------------------------------------------------------------ OPTIONS /docs/ZONE%20100-105.doc HTTP/1.1 Translate: f User-Agent: Microsoft Data Access Internet Publishing Provider Protocol Discovery Host: <REMOVED> Content-Length: 0 Connection: Keep-Alive Pragma: no-cache X-NovINet: v1.2 HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Content-Length: 83 Content-Type: text/html Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="<REMOVED>" X-Powered-By: ASP.NET Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:37:36 GMT ------------------------------------------------------------------ UPDATE 2: I found a potential workaround for the problem via this post: http://forums.iis.net/p/1149091/1868317.aspx. I moved all of the documents that are being requested into a folder outside of the web root, and created a virtual directory for it (also outside of the web root). When I followed a link to one of the documents in IE and then closed the document I wasn't presented with a login prompt. I should point out that I'm not using FPSE, unlike the person in the forum post. Ideally I don't want to have to put the documents in a separate virtual directory, but this is the simplest solution I've found so far.

    Read the article

  • Why am i getting these errors from GitHub?

    - by acidzombie24
    I followed these instruction and could not connect to github for the life of me. >plink -ssh github.com FATAL ERROR: Disconnected: No supported authentication methods available plink -ssh [email protected] You've successfully authenticated, but GitHub does not with tortoisegit git.exe push "origin" master ERROR: Permission to name/MyEmptyRepoOnGitHubHere denied to name. fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Whats going on? NOTE: I followed the instructions carefully. It was a lot worse before i followed them.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >