Search Results

Search found 62705 results on 2509 pages for 'sql calc found rows'.

Page 187/2509 | < Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >

• What does "foo" mean in this SQL Server Query ?

  - by John

  for eg... SELECT * FROM ( SELECT RANK() OVER (ORDER BY stud_mark DESC) AS ranking, stud_id, stud_name, stud_mark FROM tbl_student ) AS foo WHERE ranking = 10 Here foo is present...actually what it does ?..

  Read the article

• Unable to drop constraint in sql server 2005 "Could not drop constraint. See previous errors"

  - by DannykPowell

  I'm trying to drop a constraint on a db table, something like: ALTER TABLE MyTable drop CONSTRAINT FK_MyTable_AnotherTable But the execution just runs and runs. If I stop it I see: Msg 3727, Level 16, State 0, Line 2 Could not drop constraint. See previous errors. Web search throws up various pages but note that the constraint is properly named and I am trying to remove it using the correct name

  Read the article

• With SQL can you use a sub-query in a WHERE LIKE clause?

  - by Jason

  I'm not even sure how to even phrase this as it sounds weird conceptually, but I'll give it a try. Basically I'm looking for a way to create a query that is essentially a WHERE IN LIKE SELECT statement. As an example, if I wanted to find all user records with a hotmail.com email address, I could do something like: SELECT UserEmail FROM Users WHERE (UserEmail LIKE '%hotmail.com') But what if I wanted to use a subquery as the matching criteria? Something like this: SELECT UserEmail FROM Users WHERE (UserEmail LIKE (SELECT '%'+ Domain FROM Domains)) Is that even possible? If so, what's the right syntax?

  Read the article

• Dynamically add rows to listbox

  - by Ivan S

  I have a list box that displays information off of a column of a dataset. I would like the number of rows displayed to be all the rows that are in the dataset (the number of datasets in the rows vary). I'm figuring it has something to do with ListBox.Rows = Dataset.Tables[0].Rows.Count; But it seems to just always default to 4 even when it is only 2. This is what I have in my aspx.cs file. pirateBox.DataTextField = Pirateship.Tables[0].Columns["displayName"].ToString(); pirateBox.DataValueField = pirateship.Tables[0].Columns["PKID"].ToString(); pirateBox.DataSource = pirateship.Tables[0]; pirateBox.DataBind(); pirateBox.Rows = pirateship.Tables[0].Rows.Count; I've been trying a few things and this is what I have so far in .aspx <asp:ListBox ID="pirateBox" runat="server" Rows="1"></asp:ListBox>

  Read the article

• How do I iterate through hierarchical data in a Sql Server 2005 stored proc?

  - by AlexChilcott

  Hi, I have a SqlServer2005 table "Group" similar to the following: Id (PK, int) Name (varchar(50)) ParentId (int) where ParentId refers to another Id in the Group table. This is used to model hierarchical groups such as: Group 1 (id = 1, parentid = null) +--Group 2 (id = 2, parentid = 1) +--Group 3 (id = 3, parentid = 1) +--Group 4 (id = 4, parentid = 3) Group 5 (id = 5, parentid = null) +--Group 6 (id = 6, parentid = 5) You get the picture I have another table, let's call it "Data" for the sake of simplification, which looks something like: Id (PK, int) Key (varchar) Value (varchar) GroupId (FK, int) Now, I am trying to write a stored proc which can get me the "Data" for a given group. For example, if I query for group 1, it returns me the Key-Value-Pairs from Data where groupId = 1. If I query for group 2, it returns the KVPs for groupId = 1, then unioned with those which have groupId = 2 (and duplicated keys are replaced). Ideally, the sproc would also fail gracefully if there is a cycle (ie if group 1's parent is group 2 and group 2's parent is group 1) Has anyone had experience in writing such a sproc, or know how this might be accomplished? Thanks guys, much appreciated, Alex

  Read the article

• Why are there performance differences when a SQL function is called from .Net app vs when the same c

  - by Dan Snell

  We are having a problem in our test and dev environments with a function that runs quite slowly at times when called from an .Net Application. When we call this function directly from management studio it works fine. Here are the differences when they are profiled: From the Application: CPU: 906 Reads: 61853 Writes: 0 Duration: 926 From SSMS: CPU: 15 Reads: 11243 Writes: 0 Duration: 31 Now we have determined that when we recompile the function the performance returns to what we are expecting and the performance profile when run from the application matches that of what we get when we run it from SSMS. It will start slowing down again at what appear to random intervals. We have not seen this in prod but they may be in part because everything is recompiled there on a weekly basis. So what might cause this sort of behavior?

  Read the article

• Evaluate column value into rows

  - by Hugo Palma

  I have a column whose value is a json array. For example: [{"att1": "1", "att2": "2"}, {"att1": "3", "att2": "4"}, {"att1": "5", "att2": "6"}] What i would like is to provide a view where each element of the json array is transformed into a row and the attributes of each json object into columns. Keep in mind that the json array doesn't have a fixed size. Any ideas on how i can achieve this ?

  Read the article

• Forcing LINQ to SQL to make one single call for all child rows

  - by zaph0d

  Let say I have a method (example taken from another post): public IQueryable<CityBlock> GetCityBlocks(){ var results = from o in db.city_blocks let buildings = GetBuildingsOnBlock(o.block_id) //returns Iqueryable select new CityBlock { BuildingsOnBlock = buildings, BlockOwner = o.block_owner }; return results; } In the calling method I add Skip() and Take() methods plus some filtering and then do a ToList(). The trouble is that I am getting dozens of database calls - one for all the city blocks and then a separate one for each building. Is there a way that I can refactor this code to just make two calls: one for the city blocks and one for all the buildings

  Read the article

• Left outer joins that don't return all the rows from T1

  - by Summer

  Left outer joins should return at least one row from the T1 table if it matches the conditions. But what if the left outer join performs a join successfully, then finds that another criterion is not satisfied? Is there a way to get the query to return a row with T1 values and T2 values set to NULL? Here's the specific query, in which I'm trying to return a list of candidates, and the user's support for those candidates IF such support exists. SELECT c.id, c.name, s.support FROM candidates c LEFT JOIN support s on s.candidate_id = c.id WHERE c.office_id = 5059 AND c.election_id = 92 AND (s.user_id = 2 OR s.user_id IS NULL) --This line seems like the problem ORDER BY c.last_name, c.name The query joins the candidates and support table, but finds that it's a different user who supported this candidate (user_id=3, say). Then the candidate disappears entirely from the result set.

  Read the article

• How to synchronize two (or n) replication processes for MS SQL databases?

  - by Yauheni Sivukha

  There are two master databases and two read-only copies updated by standard transactional replication. It is needed to map some entity from both read-only databases, lets say that A databases contains orders and B databases contains lines. The problem is that replication to one database can lag behind replication of second database, and at the moment of mapping R-databases will have inconsistent data. For example. We stored 2 orders with lines at 19:00 and 19:03. Mapping process started at 19:05, but to the moment of mapping A database replication processed all changes up to 19:03, but B database replication processed only changes up to 19:00. After mapping we will have order entity with order as of 19:03 and lines as of 19:00. The troubles are guaranteed:) In my particular case both databases have temporal model, so it is possible to fetch data for every time slice, but the problem is to identify time of latest replication. Question: How to synchronize replication processes for several databases to avoid situation described above?

  Read the article

• How to add data to sql but for one id and more than one data ?

  - by Phsika

  i have one id and more filepaths.forexample: StudyInstanceUid:123456 FilePath: C:/a.jpg C:/b.jpg C:/c.jpg C:/d.jpg C:/e.jpg Result added table: 123456|C:/a.jpg 123456|C:/b.jpg 123456|C:/c.jpg 123456|C:/d.jpg 123456|C:/e.jpg How can i add more than one path for one id public bool AddDCMPath2(string StudyInstanceUid, string[] FilePath) { SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection("Data Source=(localhost);Initial Catalog=ImageServer; User ID=sa; Password=GENOTIP;"); SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("INSERT INTO StudyDCM (StudyInstanceUid,FilePath) VALUES (@StudyInstanceUid,@FilePath)", con); try { con.Open(); cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text; foreach (string filepath in FilePath) { cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@StudyInstanceUid", StudyInstanceUid); cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@FilePath", filepath); cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); } } finally { if((con!=null)) con.Dispose(); if((cmd!=null)) cmd.Dispose(); } return true; }

  Read the article

• T-SQL Getting duplicate rows returned

  - by cBlaine

  The following code section is returning multiple columns for a few records. SELECT a.ClientID,ltrim(rtrim(c.FirstName)) + ' ' + case when c.MiddleName <> '' then ltrim(rtrim(c.MiddleName)) + '. ' else '' end + ltrim(rtrim(c.LastName)) as ClientName, a.MISCode, b.Address, b.City, dbo.ClientGetEnrolledPrograms(CONVERT(int,a.ClientID)) as Abbreviation FROM ClientDetail a JOIN Address b on(a.PersonID = b.PersonID) JOIN Person c on(a.PersonID = c.PersonID) LEFT JOIN ProgramEnrollments d on(d.ClientID = a.ClientID and d.Status = 'Enrolled' and d.HistoricalPKID is null) LEFT JOIN Program e on(d.ProgramID = e.ProgramID and e.HistoricalPKID is null) WHERE a.MichiganWorksData=1 I've isolated the issue to the ProgramEnrollments table. This table holds one-to-many relationships where each ClientID can be enrolled in many programs. So for each program a client is enrolled in, there is a record in the table. The final result set is therefore returning a row for each row in the ProgramEnrollments table based on these joins. I presume my join is the issue but I don't see the problem. Thoughts/Suggestions? Thanks, Chuck

  Read the article

• How can I exclude LEFT JOINed tables from TOP in SQL Server?

  - by Kalessin

  Let's say I have two tables of books and two tables of their corresponding editions. I have a query as follows: SELECT TOP 10 * FROM (SELECT hbID, hbTitle, hbPublisherID, hbPublishDate, hbedID, hbedDate FROM hardback LEFT JOIN hardbackEdition on hbID = hbedID UNION SELECT pbID, pbTitle, pbPublisher, pbPublishDate, pbedID, pbedDate FROM paperback Left JOIN paperbackEdition on pbID = pbedID ) books WHERE hbPublisherID = 7 ORDER BY hbPublishDate DESC If there are 5 editions of the first two hardback and/or paperback books, this query only returns two books. However, I want the TOP 10 to apply only to the number of actual book records returned. Is there a way I can select 10 actual books, and still get all of their associated edition records? In case it's relevant, I do not have database permissions to CREATE and DROP temporary tables. Thanks for reading! Update To clarify: The paperback table has an associated table of paperback editions. The hardback table has an associated table of hardback editions. The hardback and paperback tables are not related to each other except to the user who will (hopefully!) see them displayed together.

  Read the article

• In SQL How do I copy values from one table to another based on another field's value?

  - by Joshua1729

  Okay I have two tables VOUCHERT with the following fields ACTIVATIONCODE SERIALNUMBER VOUCHERDATADBID UNAVAILABLEAT UNAVAILABLEOPERATORDBID AVAILABLEAT AVAILABLEOPERATORDBID ACTIVATIONCODENEW EXT1 EXT2 EXT3 DENOMINATION -- I added this column into the table. and the second table is VOUCHERDATAT with the following fields VOUCHERDATADBID BATCHID VALUE CURRENCY VOUCHERGROUP EXPIRYDATE AGENT EXT1 EXT2 EXT3 What I want to do is copy the corresponding VALUE from VOUCHERDATAT and put it into DENOMINATION of VOUCHERT. The linking between the two is VOUCHERDATADBID. How do I go about it? It is not a 1:1 mapping. What I mean is there may be 1000 SERIALNUMBERS with a same VOUCHERDATADBID. And that VOUCHERDATADBID has only entry in VOUCHERDATAT, hence one value. Therefore, all serial numbers belonging to a certain VOUCHERDATADBID will have the same value. Will JOINS work? What type of JOIN should I use? Or is UPDATE table the way to go? Thanks for the help !!

  Read the article

• How do you kill all current connections to a SQL Server 2005 database?

  - by Adam

  I want to rename a database, but keep getting the error that 'couldnt get exclusive lock' on the database, which implies there is some connection(s) still active. How can I kill all the connections to the database so that I can rename it?

  Read the article

• How to count two fields by using Select statement in SQL Server 2005?

  - by user144842

  Total records in table are 10. Select count(ID) from table1 where col1 = 1 (Result is 8) Select count(ID) from table1 where col2 = 1 (Result is 2) So its a same table but count is based on different condition. How am i gonna get two results (counts) using one select statement? Also Performance is a big concern here. PS: I am using Stored procedure...

  Read the article

• Selecting rows distinctively

  - by noway

  Lets assume my database table structure is something like | items | weight | |============|==========| | item_1 | 50 | | item_2 | 90 | | item_2 | 45 | | item_2 | 60 | | item_3 | 40 | In the select statement, I want to show an item only for once with the highest weight also ordered by height. So the result should be : | items | weight | |============|==========| | item_2 | 90 | | item_1 | 50 | | item_3 | 40 | I tried something like SELECT DISTINCT items, weight FROM mytable ORDER BY weight DESC but it didn't work because the results are actually distinct. How can I make that selection?

  Read the article

• MSSQL / T-SQL : How to update equal percentages of a resultset?

  - by Kent Comeaux

  I need a way to take a resultset of KeyIDs and divide it up as equally as possible and update records differently for each division based on the KeyIDs. In other words, there is SELECT KeyID FROM TableA WHERE (some criteria exists) I want to update TableA 3 different ways by 3 equal portions of KeyIDs. UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value1 WHERE KeyID IN (the first 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value2 WHERE KeyID IN (the second 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value3 WHERE KeyID IN (the third 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) or something to that effect. Thanks for any and all of your responses.

  Read the article

• SQL query joining rows with same value

  - by user1285737

  I need to write a query that creates a view that calculates the total cost of each sale, by considering quantity and price of each bought item. The view should return the debit and total cost. In the answer each debit-number should only occur once. Thanks in advance Table ITEM: ID NAME PRICE 118 Jeans 100 120 Towel 20 127 Shirt 55 Table DEBIT: DEBIT ITEM Quantity 100581 118 5 100581 120 1 100586 127 5

  Read the article

• How to synchronize two (or n) replication processes for SQL Server databases?

  - by Yauheni Sivukha

  There are two master databases and two read-only copies updated by standard transactional replication. It is needed to map some entity from both read-only databases, lets say that A databases contains orders and B databases contains lines. The problem is that replication to one database can lag behind replication of second database, and at the moment of mapping R-databases will have inconsistent data. For example. We stored 2 orders with lines at 19:00 and 19:03. Mapping process started at 19:05, but to the moment of mapping A database replication processed all changes up to 19:03, but B database replication processed only changes up to 19:00. After mapping we will have order entity with order as of 19:03 and lines as of 19:00. The troubles are guaranteed:) In my particular case both databases have temporal model, so it is possible to fetch data for every time slice, but the problem is to identify time of latest replication. Question: How to synchronize replication processes for several databases to avoid situation described above? Or, in other words, how to compare last time of replication in each database? UPD: The only way I see to synchronize is to continuously write timestamps into service tables in each database and to check these timestamps on replicated servers. Is that acceptable solution?

  Read the article

• SQL Server create a row in Table B for every row in Table A and put the ID in Table A

  - by ScottyDoesKnow

  I know how to create a row in Table B for every row in Table A: INSERT INTO [dbo].[TableB] SELECT 0, 5, 3, [TableAColumn] FROM [dbo].[TableA] But I need to also put the ID of each new TableB row into a column in TableA, and I can't figure out how to do that.

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2005 Merge Replication: Under what circumstances would the base snapshot expire?

  - by Gareth

  Obviously changing schema, adding / removing published articles etc expires the snapshot, but is there anything else that would cause the publication to expire? We're seeing a snapshot expiring without any changes to schema or data on the server. If a snapshot is older than the subscription expiration, would that cause it to be expired?

  Read the article

• How do I get SQL Server 2005 data stored as windows-1252 as UTF-8?

  - by Diodeus

  I have a client database with English and French data in windows-1252 encoding. I need to fetch this data as part of an AJAX call and send it in UTF-8 format. Is there a way I can pass the data through a stored proc to perform this conversion? My web app cannot be altered to perform this conversion itself.

  Read the article

• How to count each record in each table in a SQL Server 2005 Database?

  - by Heather

  I need to know how many records are in each table in a particular database. I don't care what is in the record, they will all need to be counted. I already know how to do this for a single table as SELECT Count(1) FROM [my_table_name], but this gets a little redundant for 200+ tables.

  Read the article

• Selecting rows with references across tables in SQLite 3

  - by ChristianK

  Hey there, I have a problem with a SQLite photo/album database. The database contains 3 tables: Albums id name hide -------------------------- 1 Holiday 2010 1 2 Day Trip 0 Photos id file ----------------- 1 photo1.jpg 2 photo2.jpg 3 photo3.jpg 4 photo4.jpg Relation (connects photos with albums) album photo ----------------- 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 A photo can be assigned to zero, one or several albums. Each album has a column 'hide' that indicates, whether the photos of this album should be ignored. I'm trying to find a SELECT query that returns all photos that are not assigned to an album + all the photos that are in albums which are not hidden (i.e. that have their 'hide' value set to 0). I came up with a query that selects photos in visible albums, but I don't know how to include the photos that are not assigned to an album. SELECT file FROM photos, albums, relation WHERE photos.id = relation.photo AND albums.id = relation.album AND albums.hide = 0 This query returns photo3.jpg and the required result would be photo3.jpg photo4.jpg because photo4.jpg is not assigned to album in the Relation table. Do you know how to solve this? Thank you very much for your help!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >