Search Results

Search found 2699 results on 108 pages for 'caching nameserver'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 19/108 | < Previous Page | 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  | Next Page >

  • Name Servers changed over 48 hrs ago and site is still down

    - by Solomon Closson
    Ok, I just recently changed Name Servers for my site (Oct. 29th): http://dream-portal.net but there is an issue, the name servers were changed from godaddy, however, the DNS is being hosted elsewhere. Godaddy states that the DNS is resolving the site to www.dream-portal.net and that is making it inaccessible from the DNS on the other host and that they can't do anything because I'm not hosting DNS with godaddy. I've contacted the other host and they say that everything is fine, however, people are not able to access the site and I can't access it from my work computer. I can only access it from my home computer. From my work computer it says that the page can not be found. What should I do? What can I do? Other people reported problems with the site here: http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=487592.msg3629960#msg3629960

    Read the article

  • removing the .local in local network name serving

    - by Paul Nathan
    I have several local machines; I use a OSX 10.6 machine to do most of the serving. Annoyingly, it postfixes its network name with .local. How would I set up a system so that I could access it by its hostname? server: httpd apache2 default install I am accessing it with a web browser(surprisingly). also when I ping my osx machine as name, it doesn't work; ping name.local does work.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to set a SRV record with xname.org

    - by Emilien
    According to XName's (not up-to-date) ChangeLog Thu Oct 19 2006 Yann Hirou ([email protected]) Adding SRV records - including modification of dns_records it appears to be possible to set a SRV record for one of your zones. However, I just can't find a way to do this in the UI. I've contacted Yann Hirou, but didn't receive any answer (he is either submerged by emails, or only responds to "paying supporters") It might be that the feature is available in the source code, but that the instance running on XName has not been updated (since 2006?) Has anyone using XName been able to set up such records? Otherwise I might be forced to switch to another free DNS service...

    Read the article

  • DNS Propagation Investigation Techniques?

    - by darkAsPitch
    So I changed the nameservers to veeter.com about 5 days ago now - and the domain is still not resolving over the net. It does intermittently, but then cuts out again every few hours. I run 10+ other domains through the same dedicated server (running CentOS/WHM) and they are all up - so it has nothing to do with that. I have asked my dedicated server support staff what the problem might be, they told me to "log into WHM and click on 'Add a DNS Zone' under the 'DNS Functions' section on the left hand side of the screen. Once you have done this and dns fully propagates it should resolve any intermittent dns issues you may be experiencing." BUT there is already a DNS zone in place for the domain on my server - so what should I do

    Read the article

  • Changing frontend cache

    - by Utsav
    Our architecture consists of a front-end cache that most read only users obtain their data from directly. The front-end cache sits in front of a farm of webservers that serve pages written in PHP. We need to be able to detect certain conditions at the front-end cache level and pass those values through to the back-end via HTTP headers. For example we would like to manually tag the carrier network based on the IP address. So, for incoming traffic if the user is say coming from an IP address in the range of "41.202.192.0"/19 we would tag them as being a Orange Cameroon user by setting the appropriate HTTP request header, e.g., X-Carrier = "Orange Cameroon". Based on the setting of this header we would like to vary the cache and serve a different banner to the end user. How would you go about doing this? Keep in mind that we don't want to pollute the cache and we also don't want to create too many small cache segments. Assumptions: You can assume that the X-Carrier has already been detected in our cache. So, for the purposes of your test you can just set this value manually in your example script.

    Read the article

  • Website cannot be accessed with google DNS because of unsigned DNS

    - by Sinan Samet
    I get this error: Inconsistent security for stakeholdergame.com - DS found at parent, but no DNSKEY found at child. On http://dnscheck.pingdom.com/?domain=stakeholdergame.com People can't access my site with google public DNS because of this. How do I solve this problem? dig @ns1.haveabyte.nl stakeholdergame.com DS shows me this ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> @ns1.haveabyte.nl stakeholdergame.com DS ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42223 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;stakeholdergame.com. IN DS ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: stakeholdergame.com. 14400 IN SOA ns1.haveabyte.nl. hostmaster.stakeholdergame.com. 2014030300 14400 3600 1209600 86400 ;; Query time: 21 msec ;; SERVER: 79.170.93.174#53(79.170.93.174) ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 10 11:20:41 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 100

    Read the article

  • is there any Open Source solution for Failover of incoming Traffic?

    - by sahil
    Hi, We have two ISP... and both ISP's Ip Nat with same Webserver IP, i want failover for incoming traffic , is there any open source solution? can i do it by making two name server , one for each ISP? ... I am not sure but as per my knowledge primary and secondary name server will reply in round robin method till they are live , once any name server will be unreachable then only another will be reply...so if i am right then i think i can do incoming failover by making two name server in my office... Waiting for your valuable response... Thanking you, Sahil

    Read the article

  • Writing low latency Java

    - by user997112
    Are there any Java-specific techniques (things which wouldnt apply to C++) for writing low latency code, in Java? I often see Java low latency roles and they ask for experience writing low latency Java- which sometimes seems a little bit of an oxymoron. The only think I could think of is experience with JNI, outsourcing I/O calls to native code. Also possibly using the disruptor pattern, but thats not an actual technology. Are there any Java specific tips for writing low latency code? I am aware there is a Real Time Java Spec, but I have been warned real-time is not the same as low latency....

    Read the article

  • Can I autoregister my clients/servers in local DNS?

    - by Christian Wattengård
    Right now I have a W2k12 server at home that I run as a domain controller. This has the extra benefit of registering every "subordinate" computers name in it's DNS so that I don't have to go around remembering IP's all the time. (And it let's me easily run dhcp also on my servers). I need to rework my home network for several odd reasons, and in this new scenario there is no place for a big honking W2k12 server box. I have a RasPI, and I have other smallish linux boxen I can use. (In a worst case scenario I'll use my NUC, but then I'll be forced to use my home cinema's UPnP-client for media... The HORROR!!) Is it possible to set up a DNS-server-"appliance" that somehow autoregisters it's own hostname.. Scenario: Router (N66u) on 172.20.20.1. Runs DHCP on 172.20.20.100-200 range. Server [verdant] of a *nix flavor on 172.20.20.2 Laptop [speedy] of W8 flavor on DHCP assigned Laptop [canary] of W8 flavor on DHCP assigned Desktop [lianyu] of Ubunto flavor on DHCP assigned What I would like is that all of the above servers (except possibly the router) would be available on verdant.starling.lan and canary.starling.lan and so on. This is how it works right now (except the Ubuntu box... I haven't cracked that one yet) because Windows just does this for you.. I would also be able to do this without any manual labor on the server. When I tell my box it's name is smoak it should "immediately" be available as smoak.starling.lan without any extra configuration on my part. How can I do this in a Linux (Ubuntu) environment? (Bonus comment upvote for naming the naming scheme :P )

    Read the article

  • Interesting links week #9

    - by erwin21
    Below a list of interesting links that I found this week: Frontend: Subway Map Visualization jQuery Plugin Internet Explorer 9 Guide for Developers Development: Html Agility Pack Cache Integration - Building and Using Custom OutputCache Providers in ASP.NET Marketing: A/B testing applications Other: Top 10 Reasons Web Developers Should Avoid Flash Interested in more interesting links follow me at twitter http://twitter.com/erwingriekspoor

    Read the article

  • Which DNS settings are used when setting up your server

    - by Saif Bechan
    I have a server and want to run my own name server service. Now I have set it up already and it works not, but I do not know where the exact settings are stored. On my server I use Plesk. When I edit DNS settings there I think it is stored in named.conf. Named is installed on the server, and BIND. Now I also have a panel from my registrar. This is separate from my server. Both places I can add the normal MX,A,CNAME, etc records. Now where is the best way to place this settings. Currently I have the same records on both places, on the server and at the registrar panel. I am correct to just add all the records at the registrar panel, and remove everything from within PLESK, and just don't run DNS on my server, because it is already done in the registrar panel. Or should I add the records in both places.

    Read the article

  • is there any Open Soruce solution for Failover of incoming Traffic?

    - by sahil
    Hi, We have two ISP... and both ISP's Ip Nat with same Webserver IP, i want failover for incoming traffic , is there any open source solution? can i do it by making two name server , one for each ISP? ... I am not sure but as per my knowledge primary and secondary name server will reply in round robin method till they are live , once any name server will be unreachable then only another will be reply...so if i am right then i think i can do incoming failover by making two name server in my office... Waiting for your valuable response... Thanking you, Sahil

    Read the article

  • Difference between multiple NS and NS having multiple A

    - by Jake
    I found this Can an NS Record Point To Multiple A Records?, but wonders what is the difference, if any. For example: mydomain.com. IN NS ns1.myhost.com. mydomain.com. IN NS ns2.myhost.com. ns1.myhost.com. IN A 111.222.333.1 ns2.myhost.com. IN A 111.222.333.2 versus mydomain.com. IN NS ns.myhost.com. ns.myhost.com. IN A 111.222.333.1 ns.myhost.com. IN A 111.222.333.2 EDIT: actually, come to think of it, it could be said the same for MX records. Any breaking differences? EDIT 2: then again, MX allow use of priority values so its a different case, in that one-ip-per-domain is more useful sometimes.

    Read the article

  • Intel programming "performance" books? [closed]

    - by user997112
    I vaguely remember seeing that Intel have produced a few good books, especially with regards to low latency programming, but I cannot remember the titles. Could people suggest the titles of Intel books (or ones relating to Intel products)? Examples include books on: -Intel Compiler -Intel Assembler -Any low level programming on Intel assembler -The Intel CPU architecture -Intel threading blocks library

    Read the article

  • prevent search engines indexing depending on domain

    - by Javier
    We have a dedicated server with a hosting company with a couple of dozens of webs in it. It happens that the nameservers (EG: ns1.domain.com, ns2.domain.com) ip's are coincident with some client webs, let's say webclient1.com and webclient2.com Problem is that for a certain searches in google, some results are showing up like ns1.domain.com/result instead of webclient1.com/result which is pretty wrong and annoying for our clients. Actually if you type in the browser ns1.domain.com or ns2.domain.com it will load some pageclients instead. Is there any way to prevent google to track those results only in case the robots are coming to check ns domains? It may be not correct to ask this as well, but why is it happening? is it a result of a bad server configuration? I'm pretty new on these matters, so thank you in advance for any help!

    Read the article

  • How to configure bind9 to route to host's IP

    - by Greg
    I'm running apache and bind9 on the same server. I would like to set a master zone to route back to this very machine's IP address without explicitly specifying it. Is this possible? If I use 127.0.0.1 for the A record, then when another computer on the network does an nslookup for mydomain.local, bind of course just returns the loopback ip (127.0.0.1) -- not the IP of the server. Is there to way to tell it to just return the network IP address for the server itself, as defined in /etc/network/interfaces?

    Read the article

  • Problem with Domain delegation...

    - by Lockhead
    Okey I have the subdomain news.247dist.com, if i dig any this domain i get: ; <<>> DiG 9.4.3-P3 <<>> news.247dist.com any ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36179 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;news.247dist.com. IN ANY ;; ANSWER SECTION: news.247dist.com. 259018 IN NS b.ns.broadmail.de. news.247dist.com. 259018 IN NS a.ns.broadmail.de. news.247dist.com. 2382 IN SOA a.ns.broadmail.de. hostmaster.news.247dist.com. 1274182332 16384 2048 1048576 2560 ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: a.ns.broadmail.de. 718 IN A 193.169.180.254 b.ns.broadmail.de. 718 IN A 193.169.181.254 ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 80.67.16.6#53(80.67.16.6) ;; WHEN: Wed May 19 17:21:16 2010 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 160 The Problem is, if I dig any this subdomain and ask one of these NS Servers in the above dig i get: ; <<>> DiG 9.4.3-P3 <<>> any @a.ns.broadmail.de news.247dist.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3887 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 3 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;news.247dist.com. IN ANY ;; ANSWER SECTION: news.247dist.com. 2560 IN SOA a.ns.broadmail.de. hostmaster.news.247dist.com. 1274182332 16384 2048 1048576 2560 news.247dist.com. 900 IN NS a.ns.broadmail.de. news.247dist.com. 900 IN NS b.ns.broadmail.de. news.247dist.com. 900 IN MX 0 mail.srv2.de. news.247dist.com. 900 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:213.61.69.122/32 ip4:193.169.180.0/23 -all" news.247dist.com. 900 IN A 193.169.180.252 ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: a.ns.broadmail.de. 900 IN A 193.169.180.254 b.ns.broadmail.de. 900 IN A 193.169.181.254 mail.srv2.de. 900 IN A 193.169.180.201 ;; Query time: 23 msec ;; SERVER: 193.169.180.254#53(193.169.180.254) ;; WHEN: Wed May 19 17:26:33 2010 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 284 So why I don't get the second result if i simple dig any news.247dist.com?

    Read the article

  • Setting up WHM nameservers

    - by Miskone
    I am new to server administration and I've just got a dedicated root server from Hetzner. First I set up in Hetzner's robot DNS entries Registered nameservers: ns1.raybear.com 88.198.32.57 ns2.raybear.com 88.198.32.57 Under DNS entires I have buzz-buzz.me pointing to 88.198.32.57 // My server IP address and on my WHM I have DNS zone for buzz-buzz.me ; cPanel first:11.42.1.17 (update_time):1402062640 Cpanel::ZoneFile::VERSION:1.3 hostname:hosting.raybear.com latest:11.42.1.17 ; Zone file for buzz-buzz.me $TTL 14400 buzz-buzz.me. 86400 IN SOA ns1.raybear.com. miskone.gmail.com. ( 2014060605 ;Serial Number 86400 ;refresh 7200 ;retry 3600000 ;expire 86400 ) buzz-buzz.me. 86400 IN NS ns1.raybear.com. buzz-buzz.me. 86400 IN NS ns2.raybear.com. buzz-buzz.me. 14400 IN A 88.198.32.57 localhost 14400 IN A 127.0.0.1 buzz-buzz.me. 14400 IN MX 0 buzz-buzz.me. mail 14400 IN CNAME buzz-buzz.me. www 14400 IN CNAME buzz-buzz.me. ftp 14400 IN CNAME buzz-buzz.me. agent 14400 IN A 88.198.32.57 src 14400 IN A 88.198.32.57 platform 14400 IN A 88.198.32.57 But still I have some problems accesing buzz-buzz.me, agent.buzz-buzz.me and platform.buzz-buzz.me Also I have problem getting mails on Google account, I can send but not receive emails. How to solve this. As I said I am completly new here and I need urgent help.:(

    Read the article

  • What are the main differences between SRV records and TXT records?

    - by Chris Adams
    Hi there, I'm trying to consolidate domain names for the servers I look after to just use one panel instead of 3 or 4, and one thing stopping me is that the provider I originally wanted to move them to only lets me the following kinds of records: A MX NS CNAME TXT The first four I understand, but I'm not sure about the relationship (if any) between SRV records and TXT records. Can I use TXT records in the place of SRV records? They both seem to be general text records to just point at a particular server without needing to specify a particular protocol, so it doesn't sound like a totally unreasonable assumption, but I'd rather check here before I break something. If I can only set the above records, does that mean I'm essentially unable to so any SRC record redirecting? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Not all of your nameservers are in different subnets. Single point of failure

    - by user2118559
    Using VPS hosting and dynadot (domain registrar) DNS. Checked domain name with http://www.intodns.com and get some warnings Different subnets WARNING: Not all of your nameservers are in different subnets and Different autonomous systems WARNING: Single point of failure As understand to avoid the warning must have second Ip4 address and both the addresses must point to different servers? If both Ip addresses point to the same server, it does not help? I mean each server has own Ip address. If one server down, then visitors can access website (files) on another server? Is this the reason why need more than one Ip? Tried to point website to 2 ip addresses and after some time get warning from uptimerobot Connection Timeout

    Read the article

  • UAE and the mysteries of unreachable websites

    - by 0plus1
    I write here because I'm really lost, please stay with me because it's not easy to explain. A company asked me to set-up a private server, now I'm a programmer so I got a solution with technical support and cpanel which helped me to setup everything and it's working smoothless. I'm by no means a professional sysadmin, but I have a fair knowledge of server configurations, but this problem is way over my knowledge, and apparently way over the knowledge of most sysadmins, I really hope that here I'll find someone with enough experience to help me or at least give me more insight. Now this company for which I'm consulting operates in the UAE (United Arab Emirates) and from there the server is almost unreachable. It started with ns not registering in the UAE, after a week that sorted itself out and now the site is indeed reachable, but it takes almost 2 minutes to load a webpage with one line of text. Emails go in timeout. The domain currently parked there has been bought appositely for tests, the main one that was supposed to go there, after a catastrophic week has been transferred to a shared hosting solution in the UK, and from there it works like a charme. Now after doing some research I discovered that I'm not alone in this, there are several reports of webmasters discovering that their website is not reachable inside the UAE, and mind this has nothing to do with the state-wide block of questionable sites, because in that case an error message appears, this seems to be related to the infrastructure of the UAE, which apparently reroutes everything through their own "fake" internet. Apparently new servers with their own IP are not recognized (yet?) by the UAE infrastructure, while shared hosting solutions seeing that they operates tons of other websites are more likely to be part of the UAE network. Now my questions are: 1) Has someone a real explanation for this? The only thing I can think of is that the server is on a new IP that is not yet recognized by the UAE, but that doesn't explain why it loads (even if after 2 minutes). I don't have any help from within the UAE as the only people that are "experts" are questionable companies that simply try to sell their own services. 2) If there is really some kind of block of new servers, is it possible to know before if a server is reachable from within the UAE, currently this is not a ns problem as even accessing the server with its IP result in a 2 minute wait. 3) Can it be that the problem lies somewhere else? There are some tests that I can perform? I'm not physically in the UAE, but I can ask the people there, or use teamviewer. Could it be some misconfiguration on the server (mind that the site works EVERYWHERE else in the world). Thank you for ANY kind of help

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  | Next Page >