Search Results

Search found 1214 results on 49 pages for 'protection'.

Page 19/49 | < Previous Page | 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  | Next Page >

  • Kaspersky crée son propre système d'exploitation sécurisé, pour protéger les systèmes critiques des attaques sophistiquées

    Kaspersky crée son propre système d'exploitation sécurisé Pour protéger les systèmes critiques des attaques sophistiquées Devant la complexité sans précédent des dernières cyberattaques massives, Kaspersky Labs décide de prendre les choses en main et propose son propre OS sécurisé. La compagnie engage son expertise et son expérience en matière de sécurité pour concevoir et déployer un système d'exploitation sécurisé pour des systèmes jugés d'une « importance capitale ». Ceci étant dans le but de fournir une couche supplémentaire de protection contre malwares et autres attaques intelligentes. [IMG]http://idelways.developpez.com/news/images/kaspersky-lab.jpg[/IMG]

    Read the article

  • Domain registered with Fake info! [closed]

    - by John
    Possible Duplicate: Providing fake info during domain registration - does it matter? I have registered a Domain with fake info 24 hours ago (I didn't know its illegal! :() its still pending (not available yet) I'm not like, criminal or spammer but I don't want to show my real id, what do you suggest so I don't lose my Domain. Can I transfer it to a service like name.com because I heard they provide ID protection!

    Read the article

  • Security Seminar in Colchester Vermont Wed March 31st

    Kapersky Lab, a computer security company, will be presenting a  1/2 day seminar next week in colchester SECURING BEYOND COMPLIANCE WITH ENCRYPTION & MALWARE PROTECTION March 31 8am to 12:00pm at the Hampton Inn - Colchester VT More information and to register: http://www.npi.net/seminars/...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Comment se débarrasser du nouveau botnet "pratiquement indestructible" ? Les conseils de Microsoft et de Symantec

    Comment se débarrasser du nouveau botnet "pratiquement indestructible" ? Les conseils de Microsoft et de Symantec Microsoft met en garde contre Popureb, un nouveau Rootkit sophistiqué, capable d'écraser le MBR (Master Boot Record) et particulièrement difficile, voire impossible à détecter. Le centre de protection de Microsoft (Microsoft Malware Portection Center) affirme dans un billet de blog que si le système d'exploitation d'un utilisateur est infecté par le Trojan Win32/Popureb.E, il devra rétablir le MBR, et utiliser ensuite le CD de restauration pour restaurer son système à un état antérieur à l'infection.

    Read the article

  • Do I need to have antivirus software installed on a Linux distro?

    - by Vinaychalluru
    I thought that there was no need to scan for viruses in Ubuntu or any Linux distros until I found a virus scanner package named 'clamtk' and 'klamav' in Ubuntu software center yesterday. This leads to the following questions: How do viruses differ between Linux and Windows? How do the strategies for protection differ between Linux and Windows? Should a virus scanner package be installed on my system? If so, which would be a better option?

    Read the article

  • Internet Explorer : Microsoft rejoint la Phishing Initiative, un projet commun avec Paypal et le CERT-LEXSI contre l'hameçonnage

    Internet Explorer : Microsoft rejoint la Phishing Initiative Un projet commun avec Paypal, et le CERT-LEXSI contre l'hameçonnage En partenariat avec le CERT-LEXSI, Microsoft participe à la « phishing initiative » afin de fournir aux utilisateurs français d'Internet Explorer une meilleure protection contre le hameçonnage. Après l'annonce de l'introduction d'une fonctionnalité contre le traçage sur le web dans IE9 Microsoft ne s'arrête pas là malgré les études présentant

    Read the article

  • Popularizing SEO Through Link Building

    The most important thing for a starting SEO site is by creating an authoritative facade that will boost confidence for the site. By this one will be committing the site into an easily accessible link with secure policies for the user such as a posting requesting the user to check out the private data protection criteria once they log on to the site.

    Read the article

  • How hard is to be the anonymous owner of a website?

    - by silla
    I'd like to create a website with a very radical political message. It won't be unethical (encouraging violence, etc) but I feel the points I plan to list in it will definitely make me a lot of enemies. How hard would it be to protect my identity from anyone finding out who I am? I know domains always have a $10/year option for privatizing your registration information but is there any other protection I should think about having? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Un expert en sécurité sort Aviator, un navigateur basé sur Chromium qui vide son cache par défaut et bloque l'installation des cookies tiers

    Protection de la vie privée : Aviator le nouveau navigateur voit le jour il vide part défaut son cache de navigation et bloque l'installation des cookies tiersSelon des experts en sécurité web, deux types de menaces principales guettent les internautes. Ces menaces ont en commun d'installer sur l'ordinateur des utilisateurs des logiciels. Alors que le premier type installe des malwares, la seconde catégorie est moins dangereuse. Les logiciels qu'elle installe sont plutôt du type espion.Si pour...

    Read the article

  • How To Harden PHP5 With Suhosin On CentOS 5.4

    <b>Howtoforge:</b> "This tutorial shows how to harden PHP5 with Suhosin on a CentOS 5.4 server. From the Suhosin project page: "Suhosin is an advanced protection system for PHP installations that was designed to protect servers and users from known and unknown flaws in PHP applications and the PHP core."

    Read the article

  • Google présente une version alpha d'End-to-End, un plugin Chrome pour le chiffrement des courriels de bout en bout

    Google présente une version alpha d'End-to-End, un plugin Chrome pour le chiffrement des courriels de bout en bout Dans son Transparency Report, Google a revêtu son uniforme d'éducateur pour sensibiliser le public sur la protection de leurs courriels pendant qu'ils parcourent le web. Pour pouvoir mieux expliquer cette notion, Moutain View a établi une analogie avec un système qu'il est mieux susceptible de comprendre : la poste. « Quand vous écrivez une lettre à votre amie, vous espérez qu'elle...

    Read the article

  • System Center 2012 : la plateforme de gestion des infrastructures de Cloud privé de Microsoft est disponible en version finale

    System Center 2012 : la plateforme de gestion des infrastructures de Cloud privé de Microsoft est disponible en version finale Mise à jour du 04/04/2012 System Center 2012, la plate-forme complète pour l'administration des postes de travail, des serveurs, des applications et des périphériques, en environnement physique ou virtuel est disponible en version finale. La plateforme regroupe au sein d'une seule solution unifiée, huit produits distincts permettant de déployer des services sur le Cloud, d'assurer la protection des données, de gérer les autres dispositifs non-Microsoft à l'instar de l'iPad, etc. (lire ci-avant). ...

    Read the article

  • A review of the latest version of Crypto Obfuscator for .NET and its features.

    Crypto Obfuscator For .Net is a powerful and easy-to-use product for code protection, deployment and optimization of your your .Net software. A review of the latest version of Crypto Obfuscator for .NET and its features.  read moreBy Peter BrombergDid you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Facebook : les adresses et numéros de téléphone à la portée des applications, Sophos recommande la validation préalable

    Facebook : les adresses et numéros de téléphone à la portée des applications Sophos recommande la validation préalable des applications Facebook vient de mettre à jour (discrètement) ses API et son système de gestion des droits d'accès pour permettre aux applications tierces (et leurs développeurs donc) d'accéder aux contacts des utilisateurs, y compris l'adresse postale et les numéros de téléphone. Bien que l'accès à ces informations soit soumis à une validation manuelle par l'utilisateur via le système des notifications, cette démarche risque de raviver les inquiétudes sur la sécurité et la protection de la vie privée des utilisateurs. En effet, avec la qu...

    Read the article

  • Database Activity Monitoring Part 1 - An Introduction

    We are inundated with new technologies and products designed to help make our organisations safe from hackers and other malcontents. One technology that has gained ground over the past few years is database activity monitoring. It makes sense to protect valuable databases, and by adding an intelligent monitor capable of sniffing out threats an additional level of protection can be gained. But what is database activity monitoring and why should you care?

    Read the article

  • High CPU usage by 'svchost.exe' and 'coreServiceShell.exe'

    - by kush.impetus
    I am having a laptop running on Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit. Since past few days, my laptop is facing a serious problem. Whenever I connect to Internet, either svchost.exe or coreServiceShell.exe or both hog the CPU. The coreServiceShell.exe consumes a lot of RAM also. Going into the details, I found that high CPU usage of svchost.exe is caused by Network Location Awareness service. And the high CPU usage of coreServiceShell.exe is caused by Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012. That kind'a makes me think that Trend Micro may be the root of the problem. After further testing, I found that if I use IE or Firefox to browse the Internet, immediately after connecting to Internet, things are normal. See and But if I use Google Chrome, the coreServiceShell.exe hogs both CPU and RAM. At this point, if I disconnect the Internet, the CPU and RAM usage by coreServiceShell.exe continues to be high till I close the Chrome. Also, when I close the Chrome, while Internet is connected, svchost.exe continues to hog CPU but coreServiceShell.exe leaves the race. That makes think that Chrome is the root of the problem, but again, tracing coreServiceShell.exe takes me back to Trend Micro Internet Security. Stopping the Protection by the Trend Micro Internet Security doesn't help either (I am not able to stop its services though). I have updated the Chrome, but no help. I just can't figure out who is the culprit. I can't do without the Google Chrome (of course, by not using it) because of its immensely useful and indispensable features both during browsing and development. Secondly, I can't uninstall the Trend Micro Internet security Suite since it still has few months before it expires and is proving me reliable protection. What could be the cause of the problem and what can I do to resolve this? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • RouterOS on Hyper-V (v3/2012) - any way to get it working?

    - by TomTom
    Trying to set up a small VPN point to connect into a remote Hyper-V cluster using ROuterOS. Anyone got it working ON Hyper-V with the latest builds of RouterOS? It seems the legacy network adapter is not supported anymore either (or just broken). The platform is a Windows Server 2012 RC. This is not a high performance setup - the RouterOS wont do the routing for more than the backend administrative access, and the only real traffic we will see there is when ISO images for new operating systems are uploaded. Otherwise we will have possibly RDP traffic as well as web / http traffioc, but this is internal only (dashboards, some control panel). The server has no public business. So the price for non virtualized network cards is ok for me. After hooking up - ping just does not work. After some time I see in windows (arp -a on the command line), so I know that the Hyper-V side is set up properly. Just no packets arrived. I have turned off all protection on Hyper-V (or : not turned them on), so no MAC spoofing protection etc. in the Advanced page for the legacy adapters. Unless I can get it work I will have to resort to using a windows install as router / VPN endpoint, which introduces another OS into the fabric (we run all routers etc. so far on mikrotik in hardware, which is why I want this one to be RouterOS, too). And no, putting hardware there is NOT an option - the cost would be significant.

    Read the article

  • Appcrash and possible malware

    - by Chris Lively
    First off, I'm running MS Intune Endpoint Protection. It is completely up to date. On 10/25 @ 11:53PM I came across a site that caused Intune to freak out: Microsoft Antimalware has detected malware or other potentially unwanted software. For more information please see the following: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=37020&name=Trojan:Win64/Sirefef.B&threatid=2147646729 Name: Trojan:Win64/Sirefef.B ID: 2147646729 Severity: Severe Category: Trojan Path: file:_C:\Windows\System32\consrv.dll Detection Origin: Local machine Detection Type: Concrete Detection Source: Real-Time Protection User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM Process Name: C:\Windows\explorer.exe Signature Version: AV: 1.115.526.0, AS: 1.115.526.0, NIS: 10.7.0.0 Engine Version: AM: 1.1.7801.0, NIS: 2.0.7707.0 I, of course, elected to simply delete the file. Since then my machine has been randomly giving an error about "Host Process for Windows Services" stopped working. There are generally two different pieces of info: Description Faulting Application Path: C:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe Problem signature Problem Event Name: BEX64 Application Name: svchost.exe Application Version: 6.1.7600.16385 Application Timestamp: 4a5bc3c1 Fault Module Name: StackHash_52d4 Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000 Exception Offset: 000062bdabe00000 Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Data: 0000000000000008 OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.27 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: 52d4 Additional Information 2: 52d47b8b925663f9d6437d7892cdf21b Additional Information 3: ed24 Additional Information 4: ed24528f3b69e8539b5c5c2158896d3e and Description Faulting Application Path: C:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe Problem signature Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: svchost.exe Application Version: 6.1.7600.16385 Application Timestamp: 4a5bc3c1 Fault Module Name: mshtml.dll Fault Module Version: 9.0.8112.16437 Fault Module Timestamp: 4e5f1784 Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Offset: 00000000002ed3c2 OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.27 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: 3e9e Additional Information 2: 3e9e8b83f6a5f2a25451516023078a83 Additional Information 3: 432a Additional Information 4: 432a0284c502cce3bbb92a3bd555fe65 Intune claims the machine is clean. I've also tried some of the online scanners like trendmicro, all of which claimed the system is clean. Finally, I tried the "sfc /scannow" and it said all was good. I left my machine on after I left last night and there were about 50 of those messages. Ideas on how to proceed?

    Read the article

  • PORT FORWARDING TO PUT MY WEB SERVER ON THE INTERNET

    - by Chadworthington
    I went to http://canyouseeme.org/ to check to see what my external IP address. Regardless of what port I enter, it tells me that the port is blocked. I have a LinkSys router that basically has the default settings with the exception that I have WEP encrptin setup and I have forwarded a few ports, including 80 and 69. I forwarded them to the 192.x.x.103 IP address of the PC which is running IIS. That PC runs Symantec Endpoint Protection, which I right mouse clicked in the tray to Disable. These steps used to make my PC visible so I could host my own web site in IIS on port 80, or some other port, like 69. Yet, the Open Port tool cannot see my IP when it checks eiether port and when I navigate to http://my external ip/ I get "page cant be displayed" At first I was thinking that maybe Comcast is blocking port 80, but 69 doesnt work eiether. I do not see any other blockking set up in my router and, as I mentioned, I went with teh defaults except where discussed. This is a corporate PC and Symantec End Point Protecion is new to it (this previously worked on teh same PC with Symantec Protection Agent), but I thought that disabling Sym End Pt from the tray, that that would effectively neutralize it. I do not have the rights to kill the program itself. Any suggestions on what else to try to make my PC externally visible?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  | Next Page >