Search Results

Search found 24043 results on 962 pages for 'private methods'.

Page 191/962 | < Previous Page | 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198  | Next Page >

  • .NET MVC - Storing database result during single page result?

    - by ropstah
    Fairly simple issue which is solved in PHP by using a static variable. private static $pages; public function Pages() { if($pages == null) { $pages = new PageCollection(); $pages->findAll(); } } Everywhere in my code I use Pages()::someFindFunction() to make sure the results are fetched only once, and I use that same collection. I want the same in my .NET MVC application: use something like: <%=MySite.Pages.findById(1).Title%> In the code below, if I use a private variable, or if I use a public class with shared variables (doesn't matter) they are both persisted during the entire application. I want them to load the same way PHP does, once per request. Now where do I store the .NET equivalent of private static $pages, so that the code below works? //what to do with $pages?? Public Module MySite Public Function Pages() As PageCollection If $pages Is Nothing Then $pages.loadAll() End If Return $pages End Function End Module

    Read the article

  • Equivalent of public static final fields in Scala

    - by JT
    I'm learning Scala, and I can't figure out how to best express this simple Java class in Scala: public class Color { public static final Color BLACK = new Color(0, 0, 0); public static final Color WHITE = new Color(255, 255, 255); public static final Color GREEN = new Color(0, 0, 255); private static final int red; private static final int blue; private static final int green; public Color(int red, int blue, int green) { this.red = red; this.blue = blue; this.green = green; } // getters, et cetera } The best I have is the following: class Color(val red: Int, val blue: Int, val green: Int) object BLACK extends Color(0, 0, 0) object WHITE extends Color(255, 255, 255) object GREEN extends Color(0, 0, 255) But I lose the advantages of having BLACK, WHITE, and GREEN being tied to the Color namespace.

    Read the article

  • Is this code thread-safe?

    - by mafutrct
    I've got a class with several properties. On every value update, a Store method is called with stores all fields (in a file). private int _Prop1; public int Prop1 { get { return _Prop1; } set { _Prop1 = value; Store(); } } // more similar properties here... private XmlSerializer _Ser = new ...; private void Store() { lock (_Ser) { using (FileStream fs = new ...) { _Ser.Serialize (fs, this); } } } Is this design thread-safe? (Btw, if you can think of a more appropriate caption, feel free to edit.)

    Read the article

  • Singleton class issue in Qt

    - by sijith
    i created a singleton class and trying to access that class in other class but getting error "cannot access private member" Setupconfig is my singleton class and i am trying to access this class in other class which have QMainWindow Error 'Setupconfig::Setupconfig' : cannot access private member declared in class 'Setupconfig' ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Setupconfig.h static Setupconfig *buiderObj() { static Setupconfig *_setupObj= new Setupconfig(); return _setupObj; } private: Setupconfig(); ////////////////////////////////////// EasyBudget.h class EasyBudget : public QMainWindow, public Ui::EasyBudgetClass, public Setupconfig { Q_OBJECT public: Setupconfig *setupObj; } ////////////////////////////////////// EasyBudget.cpp EasyBudget::EasyBudget(QWidget *parent, Qt::WFlags flags) : QMainWindow(parent,Qt::FramelessWindowHint) { setupObj=Setupconfig::buiderObj(); }

    Read the article

  • Is this a correct Interlocked synchronization design?

    - by Dan Bryant
    I have a system that takes Samples. I have multiple client threads in the application that are interested in these Samples, but the actual process of taking a Sample can only occur in one context. It's fast enough that it's okay for it to block the calling process until Sampling is done, but slow enough that I don't want multiple threads piling up requests. I came up with this design (stripped down to minimal details): public class Sample { private static Sample _lastSample; private static int _isSampling; public static Sample TakeSample(AutomationManager automation) { //Only start sampling if not already sampling in some other context if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref _isSampling, 0, 1) == 0) { try { Sample sample = new Sample(); sample.PerformSampling(automation); _lastSample = sample; } finally { //We're done sampling _isSampling = 0; } } return _lastSample; } private void PerformSampling(AutomationManager automation) { //Lots of stuff going on that shouldn't be run in more than one context at the same time } } Is this safe for use in the scenario I described?

    Read the article

  • dynamic behavior of factory class

    - by manu1001
    I have a factory class that serves out a bunch of properties. Now, the properties might come either from a database or from a properties file. This is what I've come up with. public class Factory { private static final INSTANCE = new Factory(source); private Factory(DbSource source) { // read from db, save properties } private Factory(FileSource source) { // read from file, save properties } // getInstance() and getProperties() here } What's a clean way of switching between these behaviors based on the environment. I want to avoid having to recompile the class each time.

    Read the article

  • C# myths about best practices?

    - by TheMachineCharmer
    My colleague keeps telling me of the things listed in comments. I am confused. Can somebody please demystify these things for me? class Bar { private int _a; public int A { get { return _a; } set { _a = value; } } private Foo _objfoo; public Foo OFoo { get { return _objfoo; } set { _objfoo = value; } } public Bar(int a, Foo foo) { // this is a bad idea A = a; OFoo = foo; } // MYTHS private void Method() { this.A //1 - this._a //2 - use this when inside the class e.g. if(this._a == 2) A //3 - use this outside the class e.g. barObj.A _a //4 - // Not using this.xxx creates threading issues. } } class Foo { // implementation }

    Read the article

  • Generating short license keys with OpenSSL

    - by Marc Charbonneau
    I'm working on a new licensing scheme for my software, based on OpenSSL public / private key encryption. My past approach, based on this article, was to use a large private key size and encrypt an SHA1 hashed string, which I sent to the customer as a license file (the base64 encoded hash is about a paragraph in length). I know someone could still easily crack my application, but it prevented someone from making a key generator, which I think would hurt more in the long run. For various reasons I want to move away from license files and simply email a 16 character base32 string the customer can type into the application. Even using small private keys (which I understand are trivial to crack), it's hard to get the encrypted hash this small. Would there be any benefit to using the same strategy to generated an encrypted hash, but simply using the first 16 characters as a license key? If not, is there a better alternative that will create keys in the format I want?

    Read the article

  • Generic WithEvents

    - by serhio
    Error: 'WithEvents' variables can only be typed as classes, interfaces or type parameters with class constraints Background: Public Class Tadpole(Of T As IVisibleChanged, P As IVisibleChanged) Private WithEvents _Tad As T ' ERROR ' Private WithEvents _Pole As P ' ERROR ' Public Property Tad() As T ... Public Property Pole() As P ... End Class ''' IVisibleChanged ''' Public Interface IVisibleChanged Property Visible() As Boolean Event VisibleChanged As EventHandler End Interface Workaround: a. Use AddHandler to handle events defined in a structure. EDIT b. use Private WithEvents _Tad AsIVisibleChanged (M.A. Hanin) c. ?

    Read the article

  • When defining a class as internal, do you define what would usually be public fields as internal?

    - by devoured elysium
    When defining a class as internal, do you define what would usually be public fields as internal? Or do you leave them as public? I have a set of classes with public/private methods that I have decided to set as internal. Now, should I change the class' modifier to internal and let the rest of the methods/properties as they are (public/private) or switch them to (internal/private)? I don't see a big point in changing it to internal, and if by some reason later I want to set them back to public it's going to give a lot of work to have to put them back to public again. Any other thoughts on this?

    Read the article

  • Sending the files (At least 11 files) from folder through web service to android app.

    - by Shashank_Itmaster
    Hello All, I stuck in middle of this situation,Please help me out. My question is that I want to send files (Total 11 PDF Files) to android app using web service. I tried it with below code.Main Class from which web service is created public class MultipleFilesImpl implements MultipleFiles { public FileData[] sendPDFs() { FileData fileData = null; // List<FileData> filesDetails = new ArrayList<FileData>(); File fileFolder = new File( "C:/eclipse/workspace/AIPWebService/src/pdfs/"); // File fileTwo = new File( // "C:/eclipse/workspace/AIPWebService/src/simple.pdf"); File sendFiles[] = fileFolder.listFiles(); // sendFiles[0] = fileOne; // sendFiles[1] = fileTwo; DataHandler handler = null; char[] readLine = null; byte[] data = null; int offset = 0; int numRead = 0; InputStream stream = null; FileOutputStream outputStream = null; FileData[] filesData = null; try { System.out.println("Web Service Called Successfully"); for (int i = 0; i < sendFiles.length; i++) { handler = new DataHandler(new FileDataSource(sendFiles[i])); fileData = new FileData(); data = new byte[(int) sendFiles[i].length()]; stream = handler.getInputStream(); while (offset < data.length && (numRead = stream.read(data, offset, data.length - offset)) >= 0) { offset += numRead; } readLine = Base64Coder.encode(data); offset = 0; numRead = 0; System.out.println("'Reading File............................"); System.out.println("\n"); System.out.println(readLine); System.out.println("Data Reading Successful"); fileData.setFileName(sendFiles[i].getName()); fileData.setFileData(String.valueOf(readLine)); readLine = null; System.out.println("Data from bean " + fileData.getFileData()); outputStream = new FileOutputStream("D:/" + sendFiles[i].getName()); outputStream.write(Base64Coder.decode(fileData.getFileData())); outputStream.flush(); outputStream.close(); stream.close(); // FileData fileDetails = new FileData(); // fileDetails = fileData; // filesDetails.add(fileData); filesData = new FileData[(int) sendFiles[i].length()]; } // return fileData; } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } return filesData; } } Also The Interface MultipleFiles:- public interface MultipleFiles extends Remote { public FileData[] sendPDFs() throws FileNotFoundException, IOException, Exception; } Here I am sending an array of bean "File Data",having properties viz. FileData & FileName. FileData- contains file data in encoded. FileName- encoded file name. The Bean:- (FileData) public class FileData { private String fileName; private String fileData; public String getFileName() { return fileName; } public void setFileName(String fileName) { this.fileName = fileName; } public String getFileData() { return fileData; } public void setFileData(String string) { this.fileData = string; } } The android DDMS gives out of memory exception when tried below code & when i tried to send two files then only first file is created. public class PDFActivity extends Activity { private final String METHOD_NAME = "sendPDFs"; private final String NAMESPACE = "http://webservice.uks.com/"; private final String SOAP_ACTION = NAMESPACE + METHOD_NAME; private final String URL = "http://192.168.1.123:8080/AIPWebService/services/MultipleFilesImpl"; /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); TextView textViewOne = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.textViewOne); try { SoapObject soapObject = new SoapObject(NAMESPACE, METHOD_NAME); SoapSerializationEnvelope envelope = new SoapSerializationEnvelope( SoapEnvelope.VER11); envelope.setOutputSoapObject(soapObject); textViewOne.setText("Web Service Started"); AndroidHttpTransport httpTransport = new AndroidHttpTransport(URL); httpTransport.call(SOAP_ACTION, envelope); // SoapObject result = (SoapObject) envelope.getResponse(); Object result = envelope.getResponse(); Log.i("Result", result.toString()); // String fileName = result.getProperty("fileName").toString(); // String fileData = result.getProperty("fileData").toString(); // Log.i("File Name", fileName); // Log.i("File Data", fileData); // File pdfFile = new File(fileName); // FileOutputStream outputStream = // openFileOutput(pdfFile.toString(), // MODE_PRIVATE); // outputStream.write(Base64Coder.decode(fileData)); Log.i("File", "File Created"); // textViewTwo.setText(result); // Object result = envelope.getResponse(); // FileOutputStream outputStream = openFileOutput(name, mode) } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } Please help with some explanation or changes in my code. Thanks in Advance.

    Read the article

  • Failing to send key presses to a running process in C#

    - by Waffles
    I'm using the following code to put the focus on a window (in this case, a notepad window), and sending some key presses to it everytime button 2 is clicked. However, when I press button 2, nothing happens. Can anyone tell my why my sendkeys command is failing? public partial class Form1 : Form { [DllImport("user32.dll")] static extern bool ShowWindow(IntPtr hWnd, int nCmdShow); private Process s; public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { this.s = new Process(); s.StartInfo.FileName = "notepad"; s.Start(); s.WaitForInputIdle(); } private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { ShowWindow(s.MainWindowHandle, 1); SendKeys.SendWait("Hello"); } }

    Read the article

  • Eager fetching of children with JDO (Datanucleus)

    - by Jan
    Hi, can JDO fetch all children of a database model at once? Like: class Parent { @Persistent(mappedBy="parent") private Set<Children> children; } class Children { @Persistent private Parent parent; @Persistent private String name; } In my case, I have a large number of Parents which I fetch at once. Accessing their children then takes a lot of time because they are fetched lazily. Does JDO (Datanucleus) support their fetching at once, togehter with the Parents? I also tried to fetch all Children independantly with another quey and put them into the Level2 cache afterwards, but still they are fetched (maybe jdo doesn't know about their relationship? Because the ForeignKey (parent-id) hasn't been fetched at first?) Any ideas how to read the data structure faster? Cheers, Jan

    Read the article

  • Can JNI handle any dll files (Windows)?

    - by henry
    I am new to JNI. And have a few questions : Can JNI handle every type dll exists in windows? I wanted to link a library but it gives me error. Is it possible JNI and the dll are not compatible? Excerpt from VB .NET (It works) Private Declare Function ConnectReader Lib "rfidhid.dll" () As Integer Private Declare Function DisconnectReader Lib "rfidhid.dll" () As Integer Private Declare Function SetAntenna Lib "rfidhid.dll" (ByVal mode As Integer) As Integer Full Code From Java public class MainForm { /** * @param args */ public native int ConnectReader(); public static void main(String[] args) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub MainForm mf = new MainForm(); System.out.println(mf.ConnectReader()); } static { System.loadLibrary("rfidhid"); } } Error code shown Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: MainForm.ConnectReader()I at MainForm.ConnectReader(Native Method) at MainForm.main(MainForm.java:13) Can anyone point to me where I might do wrong

    Read the article

  • net c# lock statement in data access layer

    - by Pedro Rivera
    I saw a code where they have the data access layer like this: public class CustomerDA{ private static readonly object _sync = new object(); private static readonly CustomerDA _mutex = new CustomerDA(); private CustomerDA(){ } public CustomerDA GetInstance(){ lock(_sync){ return _mutex; } } public DataSet GetCustomers(){ //database SELECT //return a DataSet } public int UpdateCustomer(some parameters){ //update some user } } public class CustomerBO{ public DataSet GetCustomers(){ //some bussiness logic return CustomerDA.GetInstance().GetCustomers(); } } I was using it, but start thinking... "and what if had to build a facebook like application where there are hundreds of thousands of concurrent users? would I be blocking each user from doing his things until the previous user ends his database stuff? and for the Update method, is it useful to LOCK THREADS in the app when database engines already manage concurrency at database server level?" Then I started to think about moving the lock to the GetCustomers and UpdateCustomer methods, but think again: "is it useful at all?"

    Read the article

  • Returning a collection of objects from a webmethod

    - by Narmatha Balasundaram
    How do I return a collection of objects from a webmethod? And can this collection of objects be of different types - say of these 3 classes, private class ClassA { int A1; int A2; } private class ClassB { int B1; } private class ClassC { int C1; } ClassA objA = new ClassA(...); ClassB objB = new ClassB(...); ClassC objC = new ClassC(...); How can I return the objects, objA, objB and objC from a method?

    Read the article

  • How to implement cancellable worker thread

    - by Arnold Zokas
    Hi, I'm trying to implement a cancellable worker thread using the new threading constructs in System.Threading.Tasks namespace. So far I have have come up with this implementation: public sealed class Scheduler { private CancellationTokenSource _cancellationTokenSource; public System.Threading.Tasks.Task Worker { get; private set; } public void Start() { _cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource(); Worker = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Factory.StartNew( () => RunTasks(_cancellationTokenSource.Token), _cancellationTokenSource.Token ); } private static void RunTasks(CancellationToken cancellationToken) { while (!cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested) { Thread.Sleep(1000); // simulate work } } public void Stop() { try { _cancellationTokenSource.Cancel(); Worker.Wait(_cancellationTokenSource.Token); } catch (OperationCanceledException) { // OperationCanceledException is expected when a Task is cancelled. } } } When Stop() returns I expect Worker.Status to be TaskStatus.Canceled. My unit tests have shown that under certain conditions Worker.Status remains set to TaskStatus.Running. Is this a correct way to implement a cancellable worker thread?

    Read the article

  • Conversion of Linq expressions

    - by Arnis L.
    I'm not sure how exactly argument what I'm trying to achieve, therefore - wrote some code: public class Foo{ public Bar Bar{get;set;} } public class Bar{ public string Fizz{get;set;} } public class Facts{ [Fact] public void fact(){ Assert.Equal(expectedExp(),barToFoo(barExp())); } private Expression<Func<Foo,bool>> expectedExp(){ return f=>f.Bar.Fizz=="fizz"; } private Expression<Func<Bar,bool>> barExp(){ return b=>b.Fizz=="fizz"; } private Expression<Func<Foo,bool>> barToFoo (Expression<Func<Bar,bool>> barExp){ return Voodoo(barExp); //<-------------------------------------------??? } } Is this even possible?

    Read the article

  • How to instert child entities in JDO (Google App Engine) ?

    - by Kerem Pekçabuk
    How do i add a record to a child entity in the example below ? For example i have a Employee Record which is name is "Sam". how do i add 2 street adress for sam ? Guess i have a The Parent entity is Employee import java.util.List; // ... @Persistent(mappedBy = "employee") private List contactInfoSets; The Child key is Adress import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Key; // ... imports ... @PersistenceCapable public class ContactInfo { @PrimaryKey @Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY) private Key key; @Persistent private String streetAddress; // ... }

    Read the article

  • How to programatically read native DLL imports in C#?

    - by Eric
    The large hunk of C# code below is intended to print the imports of a native DLL. I copied it from from this link and modified it very slightly, just to use LoadLibraryEx as Mike Woodring does here. I find that when I call the Foo.Test method with the original example's target, MSCOREE.DLL, it prints all the imports fine. But when I use other dlls like GDI32.DLL or WSOCK32.DLL the imports do not get printed. What's missing from this code that would let it print all the imports as, for example, DUMPBIN.EXE does? (Is there a hint I'm not grokking in the original comment that says, "using mscoree.dll as an example as it doesnt export any thing"?) Here's the extract that just shows how it's being invoked: public static void Test() { // WORKS: var path = @"c:\windows\system32\mscoree.dll"; // NO ERRORS, BUT NO IMPORTS PRINTED EITHER: //var path = @"c:\windows\system32\gdi32.dll"; //var path = @"c:\windows\system32\wsock32.dll"; var hLib = LoadLibraryEx(path, 0, DONT_RESOLVE_DLL_REFERENCES | LOAD_IGNORE_CODE_AUTHZ_LEVEL); TestImports(hLib, true); } And here is the whole code example: namespace PETest2 { [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)] public unsafe struct IMAGE_IMPORT_BY_NAME { [FieldOffset(0)] public ushort Hint; [FieldOffset(2)] public fixed char Name[1]; } [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)] public struct IMAGE_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR { #region union /// <summary> /// CSharp doesnt really support unions, but they can be emulated by a field offset 0 /// </summary> [FieldOffset(0)] public uint Characteristics; // 0 for terminating null import descriptor [FieldOffset(0)] public uint OriginalFirstThunk; // RVA to original unbound IAT (PIMAGE_THUNK_DATA) #endregion [FieldOffset(4)] public uint TimeDateStamp; [FieldOffset(8)] public uint ForwarderChain; [FieldOffset(12)] public uint Name; [FieldOffset(16)] public uint FirstThunk; } [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)] public struct THUNK_DATA { [FieldOffset(0)] public uint ForwarderString; // PBYTE [FieldOffset(4)] public uint Function; // PDWORD [FieldOffset(8)] public uint Ordinal; [FieldOffset(12)] public uint AddressOfData; // PIMAGE_IMPORT_BY_NAME } public unsafe class Interop { #region Public Constants public static readonly ushort IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT = 1; #endregion #region Private Constants #region CallingConvention CALLING_CONVENTION /// <summary> /// Specifies the calling convention. /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// Specifies <see cref="CallingConvention.Winapi" /> for Windows to /// indicate that the default should be used. /// </remarks> private const CallingConvention CALLING_CONVENTION = CallingConvention.Winapi; #endregion CallingConvention CALLING_CONVENTION #region IMPORT DLL FUNCTIONS private const string KERNEL_DLL = "kernel32"; private const string DBGHELP_DLL = "Dbghelp"; #endregion #endregion Private Constants [DllImport(KERNEL_DLL, CallingConvention = CALLING_CONVENTION, EntryPoint = "GetModuleHandleA"), SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity] public static extern void* GetModuleHandleA(/*IN*/ char* lpModuleName); [DllImport(KERNEL_DLL, CallingConvention = CALLING_CONVENTION, EntryPoint = "GetModuleHandleW"), SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity] public static extern void* GetModuleHandleW(/*IN*/ char* lpModuleName); [DllImport(KERNEL_DLL, CallingConvention = CALLING_CONVENTION, EntryPoint = "IsBadReadPtr"), SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity] public static extern bool IsBadReadPtr(void* lpBase, uint ucb); [DllImport(DBGHELP_DLL, CallingConvention = CALLING_CONVENTION, EntryPoint = "ImageDirectoryEntryToData"), SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity] public static extern void* ImageDirectoryEntryToData(void* Base, bool MappedAsImage, ushort DirectoryEntry, out uint Size); } static class Foo { // From winbase.h in the Win32 platform SDK. // const uint DONT_RESOLVE_DLL_REFERENCES = 0x00000001; const uint LOAD_IGNORE_CODE_AUTHZ_LEVEL = 0x00000010; [DllImport("kernel32.dll"), SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity] static extern uint LoadLibraryEx(string fileName, uint notUsedMustBeZero, uint flags); public static void Test() { //var path = @"c:\windows\system32\mscoree.dll"; //var path = @"c:\windows\system32\gdi32.dll"; var path = @"c:\windows\system32\wsock32.dll"; var hLib = LoadLibraryEx(path, 0, DONT_RESOLVE_DLL_REFERENCES | LOAD_IGNORE_CODE_AUTHZ_LEVEL); TestImports(hLib, true); } // using mscoree.dll as an example as it doesnt export any thing // so nothing shows up if you use your own module. // and the only none delayload in mscoree.dll is the Kernel32.dll private static void TestImports( uint hLib, bool mappedAsImage ) { unsafe { //fixed (char* pszModule = "mscoree.dll") { //void* hMod = Interop.GetModuleHandleW(pszModule); void* hMod = (void*)hLib; uint size = 0; uint BaseAddress = (uint)hMod; if (hMod != null) { Console.WriteLine("Got handle"); IMAGE_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR* pIID = (IMAGE_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR*)Interop.ImageDirectoryEntryToData((void*)hMod, mappedAsImage, Interop.IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT, out size); if (pIID != null) { Console.WriteLine("Got Image Import Descriptor"); while (!Interop.IsBadReadPtr((void*)pIID->OriginalFirstThunk, (uint)size)) { try { char* szName = (char*)(BaseAddress + pIID->Name); string name = Marshal.PtrToStringAnsi((IntPtr)szName); Console.WriteLine("pIID->Name = {0} BaseAddress - {1}", name, (uint)BaseAddress); THUNK_DATA* pThunkOrg = (THUNK_DATA*)(BaseAddress + pIID->OriginalFirstThunk); while (!Interop.IsBadReadPtr((void*)pThunkOrg->AddressOfData, 4U)) { char* szImportName; uint Ord; if ((pThunkOrg->Ordinal & 0x80000000) > 0) { Ord = pThunkOrg->Ordinal & 0xffff; Console.WriteLine("imports ({0}).Ordinal{1} - Address: {2}", name, Ord, pThunkOrg->Function); } else { IMAGE_IMPORT_BY_NAME* pIBN = (IMAGE_IMPORT_BY_NAME*)(BaseAddress + pThunkOrg->AddressOfData); if (!Interop.IsBadReadPtr((void*)pIBN, (uint)sizeof(IMAGE_IMPORT_BY_NAME))) { Ord = pIBN->Hint; szImportName = (char*)pIBN->Name; string sImportName = Marshal.PtrToStringAnsi((IntPtr)szImportName); // yes i know i am a lazy ass Console.WriteLine("imports ({0}).{1}@{2} - Address: {3}", name, sImportName, Ord, pThunkOrg->Function); } else { Console.WriteLine("Bad ReadPtr Detected or EOF on Imports"); break; } } pThunkOrg++; } } catch (AccessViolationException e) { Console.WriteLine("An Access violation occured\n" + "this seems to suggest the end of the imports section\n"); Console.WriteLine(e); } pIID++; } } } } } Console.WriteLine("Press Any Key To Continue......"); Console.ReadKey(); } }

    Read the article

  • Unable to create unmanaged object using new keyword in managed C++

    - by chair79
    Hi all, I've created a class with a boost::unordered_map as a member, Linkage.h #ifndef LINKAGE_H #define LINKAGE_H #include <boost/unordered_map.hpp> class Linkage { private: boost::unordered_map<int, int> m_IOMap; public: .... }; Linkage.cpp #include "stdafx.h" ... // methods and in the managed side of C++, I try to create the pointer of the obj: private: System::Void Form1_Load(System::Object^ sender, System::EventArgs^ e) { Linkage* m_pLink = new Linkage(); ..... } However this produces errors: Error 4 error LNK2005: "private: static unsigned int const boost::detail::type_with_alignment_imp<4>::found" (?found@?$type_with_alignment_imp@$03@detail@boost@@$$Q0IB) already defined in Proj_Test.obj Linkage.obj ..... Error 7 fatal error LNK1169: one or more multiply defined symbols found Could anyone explain to me pls? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • how can i use switch statement on type-safe enum pattern

    - by Fer
    I found a goodlooking example about implementation enums in a different way. That is called type-safe enum pattern i think. I started using it but i realized that i can not use it in a switch statement. My implementation looks like the following: public sealed class MyState { private readonly string m_Name; private readonly int m_Value; public static readonly MyState PASSED= new MyState(1, "OK"); public static readonly MyState FAILED= new MyState(2, "ERROR"); private MyState(int value, string name) { m_Name = name; m_Value = value; } public override string ToString() { return m_Name; } public int GetIntValue() { return m_Value; } } What can i add to my class in order to be able to use this pattern in switch statements in C#? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • d2: strange lowering of protection and possible misbehavior in static imports

    - by modchan
    Consider there is moda.d: module moda; private struct modb {}; And modb.d: module modb; private import moda; And modmain.d: module modmain; static import moda; static import modb; void main() { modb v; // should NOT compile, should it? } I don't know why, but moda.modb is visible in both modmain and modb, while, as far as I understand, it should not - both due to moda being imported as static and moda.modb being private. Or should? Have I run into dmd bug or it's planned behaviour I hadn't understood?

    Read the article

  • using Label control to create looping marquee text in c# winform

    - by hanmyint
    I have been create Marquee text using Label control her is sample code public partial class FrmMarqueeText : Form { private int xPos = 0, YPos = 0; public FrmMarqueeText() { InitializeComponent(); } private void FrmMarqueeText_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { lblText.Text = "Hello this is marquee text"; xPos = lblText.Location.X; YPos = lblText.Location.Y; timer1.Start(); } private void timer1_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (xPos == 0) { this.lblText.Location = new System.Drawing.Point(this.Width, YPos); xPos = this.Width; } else { this.lblText.Location = new System.Drawing.Point(xPos, YPos); xPos -= 2; } } but when the first time was finished, it didn't continues work .Please help me!

    Read the article

  • how to write silverlight threading function in another file or project

    - by Piyush
    I am using three tier architecture.I have SilverlightUI and UIController two projects.SilverlightUI contains only UI pages and controls while UIController contains all proxies of WCF services. Now I have created threads to update my controls dynamically and to do processing parallel.AS the requirement I want to define all functionality of threads in UIController projects.What should I do? Currenty what I am doing - private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { StartThreads(); } private void StartThreads() { private Thread _thread1; _thread1 = new Thread(DoThread1); _thread1.Start(); } public static void DoThread1() { _data1.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(delegate() { _data1.Text = _count1.ToString(); }); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); } I Want to write DoThread1() method in UIController project and call that function from here button_click()

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198  | Next Page >