Search Results

Search found 49727 results on 1990 pages for 'multiple select query'.

Page 194/1990 | < Previous Page | 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201  | Next Page >

• Maven best practice for generating artifacts for multiple environments [prod, test, dev] with CI/Hud

  - by jaguard

  I have a project that need to be deployed into multiple environments (prod, test, dev). The main differences mainly consist in configuration properties/files. My idea was to use profiles and overlays to copy/configure the specialized output. But I'm stuck into if I have to generate multiple artifacts with specialized classifiers (ex: "my-app-1.0-prod.zip/jar", "my-app-1.0-dev.zip/jar") or should I create multiple projects, one project for every environment ?! Should I use maven-assembly-plugin to generate multiple artifacts for every environment ? Anyway, I'll need to generate all them at once so it seams that the profiles does not fit ... still puzzled :( Any hints/examples/links will be more than welcomed. As a side issue, I'm also wondering how to achieve this in a CI Hudson/Bamboo to generate and deploy these generated artifacts for all the environments, to their proper servers (ex: using SCP Hudson plugin) ?

  Read the article

• Walking through an SQLite Table

  - by galford13x

  I would like to implement or use functionality that allows stepping through a Table in SQLite. If I have a Table Products that has 100k rows, I would like to retrive perhaps 10k rows at a time. Somthing similar to how a webpage would list data and have a < Previous .. Next > link to walk through the data. Are there select statements that can make this simple? I see and have tried using the ROWID in conjunction with LIMIT which seems ok if not ordering the data. // This seems works if not ordering. SELECT * FROM Products WHERE ROWID BETWEEN x AND y;

  Read the article

• advanced select in Stored Procedure

  - by Auro

  Hey i got this Table: CREATE TABLE Test_Table ( old_val VARCHAR2(3), new_val VARCHAR2(3), Updflag NUMBER, WorkNo NUMBER ); and this is in my Table: INSERT INTO Test_Table (old_val, new_val, Updflag , WorkNo) VALUES('1',' 20',0,0); INSERT INTO Test_Table (old_val, new_val, Updflag , WorkNo) VALUES('2',' 20',0,0); INSERT INTO Test_Table (old_val, new_val, Updflag , WorkNo) VALUES('2',' 30',0,0); INSERT INTO Test_Table (old_val, new_val, Updflag , WorkNo) VALUES('3',' 30',0,0); INSERT INTO Test_Table (old_val, new_val, Updflag , WorkNo) VALUES('4',' 40',0,0); INSERT INTO Test_Table (old_val, new_val, Updflag , WorkNo) VALUES('4',' 40',0,0); now my Table Looks like this: Row Old_val New_val Updflag WorkNo 1 '1' ' 20' 0 0 2 '2' ' 20' 0 0 3 '2' ' 30' 0 0 4 '3' ' 30' 0 0 5 '4' ' 40' 0 0 6 '5' ' 40' 0 0 (if the value in the new_val column are same then they are together and the same goes to old_val) so in the example above row 1-4 are together and row 5-6 at the moment i have in my Stored Procedure a cursor: SELECT t1.Old_val, t1.New_val, t1.updflag, t1.WorkNo FROM Test_Table t1 WHERE t1.New_val = ( SELECT t2.New_val FROM Test_Table t2 WHERE t2.Updflag = 0 AND t2.Worknr = 0 AND ROWNUM = 1 ) the output is this: Row Old_val New_val Updflag WorkNo 1 1 20 0 0 2 2 20 0 0 my Problem is, i dont know how to get row 1 to 4 with one select. (i had an idea with 4 sub-querys but this wont work if its more data that matches together) does anyone of you have an idea?

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2008 - Query takes forever to finish even though work is actually done

  - by Brian

  Running the following simple query in SSMS: UPDATE tblEntityAddress SET strPostCode= REPLACE(strPostCode,' ','') The update to the data (at least in memory) is complete in under a minute. I verified this by performing another query with transaction isolation level read uncommitted. The update query, however, continues to run for another 30 minutes. What is the issue here? Is this caused by a delay to write to disk? TIA

  Read the article

• Multiple values in a column

  - by Adnan

  Hi I need some advice regarding multiple records. I have a table with fields username,*message* and message_to. the scenario could be of sending same message to multiple users in a go. What do you suggest? will it be efficient to save all recipients in a single column with comma separated values or I add multiple entries ? Thanks /A

  Read the article

• getting complete sql query in jython

  - by kdev

  result=sqlstring.executeQuery("select distinct table_name,owner from all_tables ") rs.append(str(i)+' , '+result.getString("table_name")+' , '+result.getString("owner")) If i want to display the query select * from all_tables or ' select count(*) from all_tables' how can i get the output to display . Please suggest thanks

  Read the article

• Strange LINQ to SQL Behavior

  - by mcass20

  What is wrong with the last query? Is it a bug or am I missing something? This query returns 2 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>David</value>%")); This query returns 2 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>%David%</value>%")); This query returns 0 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>av</value>%")); This query returns 2 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>%av%</value>%")); This query returns 0 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>v</value>%")); This query returns 15 records (incorrect, should return 2): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>%v%</value>%"));

  Read the article

• Query a recordset

  - by Dion

  I'm trying to work out how to move the $sql_pay_det query outside of the $sql_pay loop (so in effect query on $rs_pay_det rather than creating a new $rs_pay_det for each iteration of the loop) At the moment my code looks like: //Get payroll transactions $sql_pay = 'SELECT Field1, DescriptionandURLlink, Field5, Amount, Field4, PeriodName FROM tblgltransactionspayroll WHERE CostCentreCode = "'.$cc.'" AND SubjectiveCode = "'.$subj.'" AND PeriodNo = "'.$month.'"'; $rs_pay = mysql_query($sql_pay); $row_pay = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs_pay); while($row_pay = mysql_fetch_array($rs_pay)) { $employee_name = $row_pay['Field1']; $assign_no = $row_pay['DescriptionandURLlink']; $pay_period = $row_pay['Field5']; $mth_name = $row_pay['PeriodName']; $amount = $row_pay['Amount']; $total_amount = $total_amount + $amount; $amount = my_number_format($amount, 2, ".", ","); $sql_pay_det = 'SELECT ElementDesc, Amount, WTEWorked, WTEPaid, WTEContract, Payscale FROM tblpayrolldetail WHERE CostCentreCode = "'.$cc.'" AND SubjectiveCode = "'.$subj.'" AND AccountingPeriod = "'.$mth_name.'" AND EmployeeRef = "'.$assign_no.'"'; $rs_pay_det = mysql_query($sql_pay_det); $row_pay_det = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs_pay_det); while($row_pay_det = mysql_fetch_array($rs_pay_det)) { $element_det = $row_pay_det['ElementDesc']; $amount_det = $row_pay_det['Amount']; $wte_worked = $row_pay_det['WTEWorked']; $wte_paid = $row_pay_det['WTEPaid']; $wte_cont = $row_pay_det['WTEContract']; $payscale = $row_pay_det['Payscale']; //Get band/point and annual salary where element is basic pay if ($element_det =="3959#Basic Pay"){ $sql_payscale = 'SELECT txtPayscaleName, Salary FROM tblpayscalemapping WHERE txtPayscale = "'.$payscale.'"'; $rs_payscale = mysql_query($sql_payscale); $row_payscale = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs_payscale); $grade = $row_payscale['txtPayscaleName']; $salary = "£" . my_number_format($row_payscale['Salary'], 0, ".", ","); } } } I've tried doing this: //Get payroll transactions $sql_pay = 'SELECT Field1, DescriptionandURLlink, Field5, Amount, Field4, PeriodName FROM tblgltransactionspayroll WHERE CostCentreCode = "'.$cc.'" AND SubjectiveCode = "'.$subj.'" AND PeriodNo = "'.$month.'"'; $rs_pay = mysql_query($sql_pay); $row_pay = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs_pay); //Get payroll detail recordset $sql_pay_det = 'SELECT ElementDesc, Amount, WTEWorked, WTEPaid, WTEContract, Payscale, EmployeeRef FROM tblpayrolldetail WHERE CostCentreCode = "'.$cc.'" AND SubjectiveCode = "'.$subj.'" AND AccountingPeriod = "'.$mth_name.'"'; $rs_pay_det = mysql_query($sql_pay_det); while($row_pay = mysql_fetch_array($rs_pay)) { $employee_name = $row_pay['Field1']; $assign_no = $row_pay['DescriptionandURLlink']; $pay_period = $row_pay['Field5']; $mth_name = $row_pay['PeriodName']; $amount = $row_pay['Amount']; $total_amount = $total_amount + $amount; $amount = my_number_format($amount, 2, ".", ","); //Query $rs_pay_det $sql_pay_det2 = 'SELECT ElementDesc, Amount, WTEWorked, WTEPaid, WTEContract, Payscale FROM "'.$rs_pay_det.'" WHERE EmployeeRef = "'.$assign_no.'"'; $rs_pay_det2 = mysql_query($sql_pay_det2); $row_pay_det2 = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs_pay_det2); while($row_pay_det = mysql_fetch_array($rs_pay_det)) { $element_det = $row_pay_det['ElementDesc']; $amount_det = $row_pay_det['Amount']; $wte_worked = $row_pay_det['WTEWorked']; $wte_paid = $row_pay_det['WTEPaid']; $wte_cont = $row_pay_det['WTEContract']; $payscale = $row_pay_det['Payscale']; //Get band/point and annual salary where element is basic pay if ($element_det =="3959#Basic Pay"){ $sql_payscale = 'SELECT txtPayscaleName, Salary FROM tblpayscalemapping WHERE txtPayscale = "'.$payscale.'"'; $rs_payscale = mysql_query($sql_payscale); $row_payscale = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs_payscale); $grade = $row_payscale['txtPayscaleName']; $salary = "£" . my_number_format($row_payscale['Salary'], 0, ".", ","); } } } But I get an error on $row_pay_det2 saying that "mysql_fetch_assoc(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource"

  Read the article

• Increasing FD_SETSIZE

  - by user1633717

  I need to increase the FD_SETSIZE value from 1024 to 4096. I know it'd be better to use poll()/epoll() but I want to understand what are pros/cons. The main question is: have I to recompile glibc? I read several thread where the change of .h after changing FD_SETSIZE works recompiling only the user application. Reading the glibc code (and the kernel too), actually it seems to me that if I want to use select(), FD_* macro and so on, I have to recompile all because the size of fd_set is changed. At this point I have to recompile all not only my application because if in the system there is an another "common" application that uses select and friends, I could have problem. Am I right?

  Read the article

• Getting counts of 0 from a query with a double group by

  - by Maltiriel

  I'm trying to write a query that gets the counts for a table (call it item) categorized by two different things, call them type and code. What I'm hoping for as output is the following: Type Code Count 1 A 3 1 B 0 1 C 10 2 A 0 2 B 13 2 C 2 And so forth. Both type and code are found in lookup tables, and each item can have just one type but more than one code, so there's also a pivot (aka junction or join) table for the codes. I have a query that can get this result: Type Code Count 1 A 3 1 C 10 2 B 13 2 C 2 and it looks like (with join conditions omitted): SELECT typelookup.name, codelookup.name, COUNT(item.id) FROM typelookup LEFT OUTER JOIN item JOIN itemcodepivot RIGHT OUTER JOIN codelookup GROUP BY typelookup.name, codelookup.name Is there any way to alter this query to get the results I'm looking for? This is in MySQL, if that matters. I'm not actually sure this is possible all in one query, but if it is I'd really like to know how. Thanks for any ideas.

  Read the article

• Group by query design help

  - by Midhat

  Consider this data PK field1 field2 1 a b 2 a (null) 3 x y 4 x z 5 q w I need to get this data select all columns from all rows where field1 has count 1 i tried and finally settled for select * from mytable where field1 in (select field1 from mytable group by field1 having count(field1)>1 ) order by field1 but there has to be a better way than this

  Read the article

• Codeigniter view file looping query

  - by user2505513

  Right, I'm unsure about how to code my view file to generate following query results WITHOUT compromising the principles of mvc. Query in model: SELECT * FROM events GROUP BY country, area ORDER BY country, area View: <?php if (isset($query)):?> <?php foreach ($query as $row):?> <h2><?=$row->country?></h2> <h3><?=$row->area?></h3> <?php endforeach;?> <?php endif;?> I want the results to display: England North South West - utilising the GROUP BY parameter As opposed to: England North England South England West Has anybody any advice as to how to achieve this?

  Read the article

• Get the first and last posts in a thread

  - by Grampa

  I am trying to code a forum website and I want to display a list of threads. Each thread should be accompanied by info about the first post (the "head" of the thread) as well as the last. My current database structure is the following: threads table: id - int, PK, not NULL, auto-increment name - varchar(255) posts table: id - int, PK, not NULL, auto-increment thread_id - FK for threads The tables have other fields as well, but they are not relevant for the query. I am interested in querying threads and somehow JOINing with posts so that I obtain both the first and last post for each thread in a single query (with no subqueries). So far I am able to do it using multiple queries, and I have defined the first post as being: SELECT * FROM threads t LEFT JOIN posts p ON t.id = p.thread_id ORDER BY p.id LIMIT 0, 1 The last post is pretty much the same except for ORDER BY id DESC. Now, I could select multiple threads with their first or last posts, by doing: SELECT * FROM threads t LEFT JOIN posts p ON t.id = p.thread_id ORDER BY p.id GROUP BY t.id But of course I can't get both at once, since I would need to sort both ASC and DESC at the same time. What is the solution here? Is it even possible to use a single query? Is there any way I could change the structure of my tables to facilitate this? If this is not doable, then what tips could you give me to improve the query performance in this particular situation?

  Read the article

• mysql query that has array

  - by Xainee Khan

  //get all id's of ur friend that has installed your application $friend_pics=$facebook->api( array( 'method' => 'fql.query', 'query' => "SELECT uid FROM user WHERE uid IN(SELECT uid2 from friend WHERE uid1='$user') AND is_app_user = 1" ) ); // this query work fine //your top10 friends in app $result="SELECT * FROM fb_user WHERE user_id IN($friend_pics) ORDER BY oldscore DESC LIMIT 0,10"; db_execute($result); i want to retrive ten top scorer from my database stored in oldscore but in my second query the array name $friend_pics is not working i guess,plz help me thanks

  Read the article

• Multiple Inheritance Debates II: according to Stroutroup

  - by asksuperuser

  I know very well about the traditional arguments about why Interface Inheritance is prefered to multiple inheritance, there has been already a post here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/191691/should-c-include-multiple-inheritance But according to Stroutroup the real reason why Microsoft and Sun decided to get rid off multiple inheritance is that they have vested interest to do so: instead of putting features in the languages, they put in frameworks so that people then become tied to their platform instead of people having the same capability at a language standard level. What do you think ?

  Read the article

• jquery select this parent from inside image.

  - by michael

  I have the following code, i'm trying to make a loader appear then the image fade in once it is loaded. I want to make the function reusable so i can just add an image to a div with the loader id and it will work. I cant figure out how to select the parent loader div from inside the image. the commented line works fine but, i think that will select all divs. i just want to select the parent loader div. can anyone help, thanks. <div id="loader" class="loading"> <img src="http://www.inhousedesign.co.nz/images10/caravan_01.jpg" style="display: none;"/> </div> $("#loader").each(function(){ var source = $(this).find("img").attr('src'); var img = new Image(); $(img).load(function(){ $(this).hide(); //$("#loader").removeClass('loading').append(this); $(this).parents("div:first").removeClass('loading').append(this); $(this).fadeIn(800); }).attr('src', source); });

  Read the article

• MYSQL: How to limit inner join?

  - by Sergii Rechmp

  I need some help with my query. I have 2 tables: all: art|serie sootv: name|art|foo I need to get result like name|serie. My query is: SELECT t2.NAME, t1.serie FROM ( SELECT * FROM `all` WHERE `serie` LIKE '$serie' ) t1 INNER JOIN sootv t2 ON t1.art = t2.art; it works, but sootv table contains data like name|art|foo abc | 1 | 5 abc | 1 | 6 i get 2 same results. Its not what i need. Help me please - how i can get only one result: abc|1 Thanks.

  Read the article

• GQL Query with __key__ in List of KEYs

  - by bossylobster

  In the GQL reference [1], it is encouraged to use the IN keyword with a list of values, and to construct a Key from hand the GQL query SELECT * FROM MyModel WHERE __key__ = KEY('MyModel', 'my_model_key') will succeed. However, using the code you would expect to work: SELECT * FROM MyModel WHERE __key__ IN (KEY('MyModel', 'my_model_key1'), KEY('MyModel', 'my_model_key2')) in the Datastore Viewer, there is a complaint of "Invalid GQL query string." What is the correct way to format such a query? [1] http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/gqlreference.html PS I know there are more efficient ways to do this in Python (without constructing a GQL query) and using the remote_api, but each call to the remote_api counts against quota. In an environment where quota is not (necessarily) free, quick and dirty queries are very helpful.

  Read the article

• get data from gridview without querying database

  - by frank2009

  Hi there I am new at this so please bear with me... I have managed to get the following code to work...so when I click on the "select" link in each row of the gridview, the data is transfered to other label/textbox on the webpage. So far so good, the thing is that everytime I click on select...it goes and checks on the database for the data and there is a delay of a few seconds... I was hoping that the data, since it is already visible on the gridrows, is simply "picked up" and used on other labels/textboxes...without requerying the database. Is this possible ? Thanks in advance Protected Sub GridView1_SelectedIndexChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Label1.Text = GridView2.SelectedRow.Cells(8).Text Label2.Text = GridView2.SelectedRow.Cells(9).Text TextBox1.Text = GridView2.SelectedRow.Cells(7).Text End Sub

  Read the article

• need help to construct query

  - by Learner

  i have the following result and i would like to construct the select query from the following result in java, Please help me how to go about , tablename columnname size order employee name 25 1 employee sex 25 2 employee contactNumber 50 3 employee salary 25 4 address street 25 5 address country 25 6 from this i would like to construct query like select T1.name, T1.sex,T1.contactNumber, T1.salaryT2.street, T2.contry from tablename1[employee] T1, tablename2[address] T2 how to construt the above query in java, here table name can be N also the columname can be also N. Please help me to achieve the above. Thanks and Regards

  Read the article

• Nhibernate generate plain sql query instead of execution statement

  - by Wei Ma

  Using SQL profiler, I was able to find the query generated from Nhibernate was executed in the EXEC sp_executesql N'select ...' fashion. I am wondering if there is any way to force Nhibernate to generate the plain Select ... statement instead. The reason I want this is because apparently SQL Server generated different execution plans for them, and in my scenario, the plain "select ..." runs MUCH faster.

  Read the article

• MySQL: Limit rows linked to each joined row

  - by SolidSnakeGTI

  Hello, Specifications: MySQL 4.1+ I've certain situation that requires certain result set from MySQL query, let's see the current query first & then ask my question: SELECT thread.dateline AS tdateline, post.dateline AS pdateline, MIN(post.dateline) FROM thread AS thread LEFT JOIN post AS post ON(thread.threadid = post.threadid) LEFT JOIN forum AS forum ON(thread.forumid = forum.forumid) WHERE post.postid != thread.firstpostid AND thread.open = 1 AND thread.visible = 1 AND thread.replycount >= 1 AND post.visible = 1 AND (forum.options & 1) AND (forum.options & 2) AND (forum.options & 4) AND forum.forumid IN(1,2,3) GROUP BY post.threadid ORDER BY tdateline DESC, pdateline ASC As you can see, mainly I need to select dateline of threads from 'thread' table, in addition to dateline of the second post of each thread, that's all under the conditions you see in the WHERE CLAUSE. Since each thread has many posts, and I need only one result per thread, I've used GROUP BY CLAUSE for that purpose. This query will return only one post's dateline with it's related unique thread. My questions are: How to limit returned threads per each forum!? Suppose I need only 5 threads -as a maximum- to be returned for each forum declared in the WHERE CLAUSE 'forum.forumid IN(1,2,3)', how can this be achieved. Is there any recommendations for optimizing this query (of course after solving the first point)? Notes: I prefer not to use sub-queries, but if it's the only solution available I'll accept it. Double queries not recommended. I'm sure there's a smart solution for this situation. Appreciated advice in advance :)

  Read the article

• Why does this php/ajax query fail?

  - by Ashley Brown

  I'm ajaxing over to this php file. $a = 'old'; $b = 'new'; if ($_POST['info-type'] == $a || $b) { $info = $_POST['info-type']; $query = "SELECT * FROM `tld` WHERE type = '".$var."'"; } $query = "SELECT * FROM `tld` "; $result = mysqli_query($link,$query); while($row = mysqli_fetch_assoc($result)) { echo '<div>'.$row['something'].'</div>'; } The data posted is either 'all' 'new' or 'old'. If i send the data as either new or old, the script works and outputs as expected. If the posted data is neither new or old but all instead, it fails and don't show any errors or respond anything back. (I've monitored via dev tools aswell) So, I tried this if ($_POST['info-type'] == $a || $b) { $info = $_POST['info-type']; $var = "SELECT * FROM `tld` WHERE type = '".$var."'"; } elseif ($_POST['info-type'] == 'all'){ $query = "SELECT * FROM `tld` "; } But the script still fails. If i fully remove the IF statements and use the query without the WHERE clause like it is after the elseif, it works?

  Read the article

• CAML query soap SharePoint

  - by robScott

  I'm trying to access a SharePoint list and return the calendar dates for a custom webpart I made. It was working fine, then I decided to only retrieve the date selected rather than the whole calendar, so I wanted to add a where clause. I've tried 'yyyy-MM-dd', 'yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ssZ', and 'yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ssZ' as string formats I've also tried MM/dd/yyyy as a date format. I'm using jQuery, and I do have list items in the calendar. I'm assuming my date is not in the correct format. var date = $(this).attr('date'); var sharepointDate = Date.parse(date).toString('yyyy-mm-ddT00:00:01Z'); var soapEnv = "<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/'> \ <soapenv:Body> \ <GetListItems xmlns='http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/'> \ <listName>CorporateCalendar</listName> \ <viewFields> \ <ViewFields> \ <FieldRef Name='Title' /> \ </ViewFields> \ </viewFields> \ <query><Query><Where><Geq><FieldRef Name='EventDate' /><Value Type='DateTime'>" + sharepointDate + "</Value></Geq></Where></Query></query> \ <rowLimit>500</rowLimit> \ </GetListItems> \ </soapenv:Body> \ </soapenv:Envelope>"; If I take the where clause out I receive all the items in the calendar. If the query is in there, I receive no results. Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• Adding more OR searches with CONTAINS Brings Query to Crawl

  - by scolja

  I have a simple query that relies on two full-text indexed tables, but it runs extremely slow when I have the CONTAINS combined with any additional OR search. As seen in the execution plan, the two full text searches crush the performance. If I query with just 1 of the CONTAINS, or neither, the query is sub-second, but the moment you add OR into the mix the query becomes ill-fated. The two tables are nothing special, they're not overly wide (42 cols in one, 21 in the other; maybe 10 cols are FT indexed in each) or even contain very many records (36k recs in the biggest of the two). I was able to solve the performance by splitting the two CONTAINS searches into their own SELECT queries and then UNION the three together. Is this UNION workaround my only hope? Thanks. SELECT a.CollectionID FROM collections a INNER JOIN determinations b ON a.CollectionID = b.CollectionID WHERE a.CollrTeam_Text LIKE '%fa%' OR CONTAINS(a.*, '"*fa*"') OR CONTAINS(b.*, '"*fa*"') Execution Plan (guess I need more reputation before I can post the image):

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201  | Next Page >