Search Results

Search found 32 results on 2 pages for 'docstring'.

Page 2/2 | < Previous Page | 1 2 

  • Good way to edit the previous defined class in ipython

    - by leo
    Hi, I am wondering a good way to follow if i would like to redefine the members of a previous defined class in ipython. say : I have defined a class intro like below, and later i want to redefine part of the function definition _print_api. Any way to do that without retyping it . class intro(object): def _print_api(self,obj): def _print(key): if key.startswith('_'): return '' value = getattr(obj,key) if not hasattr(value,im_func): doc = type(valuee).__name__ else: if value.__doc__ is None: doc = 'no docstring' else: doc = value.__doc__ return ' %s :%s' %(key,doc) res = [_print(element) for element in dir(obj)] return '\n'.join([element for element in res if element != '']) def __get__(self,instance,klass): if instance is not None: return self._print(instance) else: return self._print_api(klass)

    Read the article

  • Dajano admin site foreign key fields

    - by user292652
    hi i have the following models setup class Player(models.Model): #slug = models.slugField(max_length=200) Player_Name = models.CharField(max_length=100) Nick = models.CharField(max_length=100, blank=True) Jersy_Number = models.IntegerField() Team_id = models.ForeignKey('Team') Postion_Choices = ( ('M', 'Manager'), ('P', 'Player'), ) Poistion = models.CharField(max_length=1, blank=True, choices =Postion_Choices) Red_card = models.IntegerField( blank=True, null=True) Yellow_card = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True) Points = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True) #Pic = models.ImageField(upload_to=path/for/upload, height_field=height, width_field=width, max_length=100) class PlayerAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): list_display = ('Player_Name',) search_fields = ['Player_Name',] admin.site.register(Player, PlayerAdmin) class Team(models.Model): """Model docstring""" #slug = models.slugField(max_length=200) Team_Name = models.CharField(max_length=100,) College = models.CharField(max_length=100,) Win = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True) Loss = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True) Draw = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True) #logo = models.ImageField(upload_to=path/for/upload, height_field=height, width_field=width, max_length=100) class Meta: pass #def __unicode__(self): # return Team_Name #def save(self, force_insert=False, force_update=False): # pass @models.permalink def get_absolute_url(self): return ('view_or_url_name') class TeamAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): list_display = ('Team_Name',) search_fields = ['Team_Name',] admin.site.register(Team, TeamAdmin) my question is how do i get to the admin site to show Team_name in the add player form Team_ID field currently it is only showing up as Team object in the combo box

    Read the article

  • How do I use timezones with a datetime object in python?

    - by jidar
    How do I properly represent a different timezone in my timezone? The below example only works because I know that EDT is one hour ahead of me, so I can uncomment the subtraction of myTimeZone() import datetime, re from datetime import tzinfo class myTimeZone(tzinfo): """docstring for myTimeZone""" def utfoffset(self, dt): return timedelta(hours=1) def myDateHandler(aDateString): """u'Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:16:33 EDT'""" _my_date_pattern = re.compile(r'\w+\,\s+(\d+)\s+(\w+)\s+(\d+)\s+(\d+)\:(\d+)\:(\d+)') day, month, year, hour, minute, second = _my_date_pattern.search(aDateString).groups() month = [ 'JAN', 'FEB', 'MAR', 'APR', 'MAY', 'JUN', 'JUL', 'AUG', 'SEP', 'OCT', 'NOV', 'DEC' ].index(month.upper()) + 1 dt = datetime.datetime( int(year), int(month), int(day), int(hour), int(minute), int(second) ) # dt = dt - datetime.timedelta(hours=1) # dt = dt - dt.tzinfo.utfoffset(myTimeZone()) return (dt.year, dt.month, dt.day, dt.hour, dt.minute, dt.second, 0, 0, 0) def main(): print myDateHandler("Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:16:33 EDT") if __name__ == '__main__': main()

    Read the article

  • Python doctest error

    - by user74283
    Hi I recently started experimenting with python currently reading "Think like a computer scientist: Learning python v2nd edition" I have been having some trouble with doctest. I use a windows 7 machine and Eclipse IDE with pydev. My question is when i run the script below i get the error below. Said script is below the the error message Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\shaytac\PythonProjects\test.py", line 21, in doctest.testmod() File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 1829, in testmod for test in finder.find(m, name, globs=globs, extraglobs=extraglobs): File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 852, in find self._find(tests, obj, name, module, source_lines, globs, {}) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 906, in _find globs, seen) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 894, in _find test = self._get_test(obj, name, module, globs, source_lines) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 978, in _get_test filename, lineno) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 597, in get_doctest return DocTest(self.get_examples(string, name), globs, File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 611, in get_examples return [x for x in self.parse(string, name) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 573, in parse self._parse_example(m, name, lineno) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 631, in _parse_example self._check_prompt_blank(source_lines, indent, name, lineno) File "C:\Python26\lib\doctest.py", line 718, in _check_prompt_blank line[indent:indent+3], line)) ValueError: line 2 of the docstring for main.compare lacks blank after : 'compare(5, 4) ' def compare(a, b): """ >>>compare(5, 4) 1 >>>compare(7, 7) 0 >>>compare(2, 3) -1 >>>compare(42, 1) 1 """ if a > b : return 1 if a == b : return 0 if a < b : return -1 if __name__ == '__main__': import doctest doctest.testmod()

    Read the article

  • Finding What You Need in R: function arguments/parameters from outside the function's package

    - by doug
    Often in R, there are a dozen functions scattered across as many packages--all of which have the same purpose but of course differ in accuracy, performance, theoretical rigor, and so on. How do you gather all of these in one place before you start your task? So for instance: the generic plot function. Setting secondary ticks is much easier (IMHO) using a function outside of the base package, minor.tick(nx=n, ny=n, tick.ratio=n), found in Hmisc. Of course, that doesn't show up in plot's docstring. Likewise, the data-input arguments to 'plot' can be supplied by an object returned from the function 'hexbin', again, from a library outside of the base installation (where 'plot' resides). What would be great obviously is a programmatic way to gather these function arguments from the various libraries and put them in a single namespace. edit: (trying to re-state my example just above more clearly:) the arguments to plot supplied in the base package for, e.g., setting the axis tick frequency are xaxp/yaxp; however, one can also set a/t/f via a function outside of the base package, again, as in the minor.tick function from the Hmisc package--but you wouldn't know that just from looking at the plot method signature. Is there a meta function in R for this? So far, as i come across them, i've been manually gathering them in a TextMate 'snippet' (along with the attendant library imports). This isn't that difficult or time consuming, but i can only update my snippet as i find out about these additional arguments/parameters. Is there a canonical R way to do this, or at least an easier way? Just in case that wasn't clear, i am not talking about the case where multiple packages provide functions directed to the same statistic or view (e.g., 'boxplot' in the base package; 'boxplot.matrix' in gplots; and 'bplots' in Rlab). What i am talking is the case in which the function name is the same across two or more packages.

    Read the article

  • Easy ways to investigate unknown Python APIs

    - by jedi_coder
    When studying a snippet of unknown Python code, I occasionally bump into the varName.methodName() pattern. To figure out what's this, I shall study the code more, find where varName was instantiated, find its type. So if varName proves to be an instance of ClassName class, I would knew that methodName() is a method of ClassName. Sometimes varName == self and methodName() is a method of this class, or a method inherited from some other class, if the current class is subclassing some other classes. Are there quick ways / tools that could take 'methodName' as input, scan over all installed Python modules and show which classes have methodName()? The closest thing related to this I know of is ipython. If I type a class name, then dot ('.') then TAB, it can show the class members. Instead of a class I could use a name of an object (which is an instance of a certain class) and it would work too. As soon as I choose a method name from the provided options, I can type '?' or '??' and get some help if there's a docstring. I wonder if ipython can do some intelligent scanning based only on 'methodName' string. If you know alternatives to ipython that could possibly help with this, please do suggest them.

    Read the article

  • Utility that helps in file locking - expert tips wanted

    - by maix
    I've written a subclass of file that a) provides methods to conveniently lock it (using fcntl, so it only supports unix, which is however OK for me atm) and b) when reading or writing asserts that the file is appropriately locked. Now I'm not an expert at such stuff (I've just read one paper [de] about it) and would appreciate some feedback: Is it secure, are there race conditions, are there other things that could be done better … Here is the code: from fcntl import flock, LOCK_EX, LOCK_SH, LOCK_UN, LOCK_NB class LockedFile(file): """ A wrapper around `file` providing locking. Requires a shared lock to read and a exclusive lock to write. Main differences: * Additional methods: lock_ex, lock_sh, unlock * Refuse to read when not locked, refuse to write when not locked exclusivly. * mode cannot be `w` since then the file would be truncated before it could be locked. You have to lock the file yourself, it won't be done for you implicitly. Only you know what lock you need. Example usage:: def get_config(): f = LockedFile(CONFIG_FILENAME, 'r') f.lock_sh() config = parse_ini(f.read()) f.close() def set_config(key, value): f = LockedFile(CONFIG_FILENAME, 'r+') f.lock_ex() config = parse_ini(f.read()) config[key] = value f.truncate() f.write(make_ini(config)) f.close() """ def __init__(self, name, mode='r', *args, **kwargs): if 'w' in mode: raise ValueError('Cannot open file in `w` mode') super(LockedFile, self).__init__(name, mode, *args, **kwargs) self.locked = None def lock_sh(self, **kwargs): """ Acquire a shared lock on the file. If the file is already locked exclusively, do nothing. :returns: Lock status from before the call (one of 'sh', 'ex', None). :param nonblocking: Don't wait for the lock to be available. """ if self.locked == 'ex': return # would implicitly remove the exclusive lock return self._lock(LOCK_SH, **kwargs) def lock_ex(self, **kwargs): """ Acquire an exclusive lock on the file. :returns: Lock status from before the call (one of 'sh', 'ex', None). :param nonblocking: Don't wait for the lock to be available. """ return self._lock(LOCK_EX, **kwargs) def unlock(self): """ Release all locks on the file. Flushes if there was an exclusive lock. :returns: Lock status from before the call (one of 'sh', 'ex', None). """ if self.locked == 'ex': self.flush() return self._lock(LOCK_UN) def _lock(self, mode, nonblocking=False): flock(self, mode | bool(nonblocking) * LOCK_NB) before = self.locked self.locked = {LOCK_SH: 'sh', LOCK_EX: 'ex', LOCK_UN: None}[mode] return before def _assert_read_lock(self): assert self.locked, "File is not locked" def _assert_write_lock(self): assert self.locked == 'ex', "File is not locked exclusively" def read(self, *args): self._assert_read_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).read(*args) def readline(self, *args): self._assert_read_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).readline(*args) def readlines(self, *args): self._assert_read_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).readlines(*args) def xreadlines(self, *args): self._assert_read_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).xreadlines(*args) def __iter__(self): self._assert_read_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).__iter__() def next(self): self._assert_read_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).next() def write(self, *args): self._assert_write_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).write(*args) def writelines(self, *args): self._assert_write_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).writelines(*args) def flush(self): self._assert_write_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).flush() def truncate(self, *args): self._assert_write_lock() return super(LockedFile, self).truncate(*args) def close(self): self.unlock() return super(LockedFile, self).close() (the example in the docstring is also my current use case for this) Thanks for having read until down here, and possibly even answering :)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2