Search Results

Search found 374 results on 15 pages for 'fossil scm'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 2/15 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • My Dog, Cross-Channel Shopping, and Fusion SCM

    - by Kathryn Perry
    A guest post by Mark Carson, Director, Oracle Fusion Supply Chain Management I was walking my dog Max in an open space behind my house. As we tromped through the tall weeds I remembered it is tick season and that I should get Max some protection. While he sniffed merrily in the tick infested brush, I started shopping in the middle of an open field on my phone. I thought it would be convenient to pick up the tick medicine from a pet store on the way home. Searching the pet store website I saw that they had the medicine, but there was no information on whether the store had any in stock and there were no options for shipping it to the store for pickup. I could return it, but not pick it up which seamed kind of odd. I really didn't feel like making calls to the local stores to find out if they had it. Since the product is popular, I tried one of the large 'everything' stores. Browsing its website I could see that it could be shipped to me, shipped to the store for free, and that the store nearest to me had it in stock. Needless to say, this store became a better option. This experience is a small example of why retailers, distributors, and manufactures have placed a high priority on enabling 'cross-channel commerce.' Shoppers like you and me expect to be able to search, compare, buy and return products on-line and over the phone using a variety of devices including PDAs, tablets and in-store kiosks. The pet store lost my business because its web channel had limited information about its stores. I have spoken with many customers and prospects about cross-channel commerce. They all realize the business implications and urgency behind cross-channel commerce but recognize there are challenges to enable it. New and existing applications must be integrated together globally through a consistent cross-channel business process. Integration is required between applications that provide the initial shopping experience and delivery applications associated with warehouses, stores, and partners. The enablement must be accomplished in a flexible way to react to fast-changing product portfolios and new acquisitions, while at the same time minimizing costs through reuse of existing systems. Meanwhile, the business must continue to grow and decision makers need to balance new capability with peak seasons. The challenges above are not unique to retail. Any customer in any industry who has multiple points for capturing orders and multiple points for fulfilling orders will face these challenges. With this in mind, we had a unique opportunity in Fusion SCM to re-think how to build a set of modular and flexible applications in the order management space that would make these challenges easier to conquer. The results are Fusion Distributed Order Orchestration and Global Order Promising. These applications can help companies, such as the pet store, enable true cross-channel commerce. The apps provide highly adaptable and flexible business processes to automate order orchestration across multiple cross-channel systems. They also show a global view of supply across warehouses, stores, and partners for real-time availability and more accurate order promising. Additional capability includes a standards-based integration framework for seamless execution and the ability to reuse existing systems for faster and lower cost implementations. OK, that was a mouthful of features and benefits. As Max waited to cross the street (he can do basic math too), I wondered if he could relate. He does not care about leash laws, pick-up courtesy, where he can/can't walk, what time of day it is, or even ticks. He does not care about how all these things could make walking complicated. He just wants to walk. Similarly, customers just want to shop and companies just want to make it easier to sell and deliver. You can learn more about Distributed Order Orchestration and Global Order Promising in cross-channel here.

    Read the article

  • How to integrate an open source C program instead of calling its executable through a system call?

    - by ihamer
    I have an executable (fossil scm) that is being invoked by my program externally through ::CreateProcess windows call. The stdout and stderr are then captured. Since the source code for fossil is available, I would prefer to create a static library out of it and issue calls directly. Currently, communication to fossil is done through the command line parameters, and the communication back is through the process return code, stdout and stderr. Fossil writes to stdout/err through printf and fprintf calls. What is the best way to solve this with minimum alteration of fossil source? Is there a reliable and cross-platform way to intercept stdout/err and send it into a memory buffer?

    Read the article

  • What's the proper way to merge two projects in source control software

    - by Mallow
    I'm using Fossil-SCM to maintain my projects. Since I don't work in a team I usually have just a very linear branch of development: 1.0 - 1.1 - 1.2 I'm wondering what the procedure is when you have one project who's task is about to be given to a related project. And thereby rendering the first project obsolete. Although I tend to rewrite most of my code if I don't remember having already written it, I still would like to keep the code archived. And I'ld rather not have a fossil repo that just is dead. Can I merge it? Is that the proper way of handling this? For example the code was extracting data from an excel file in order to format an HTML page. Now, I've convinced my employer to move their excel spreadsheet into a database to decrease redundancy, increase efficiency and yaddy yadda. Since I can now make logical queries that don't have to jump hoops to preform using the database I won't need the extra vbs files that originally manipulated the excel file. Technically I would be porting part of the existing code into the current new project. Since it already has it's own trunk, would it be advisable to combine the trunk of a different project to this one, and how would I do that exactly?? SO I guess my tree would look like this, and I haven't seen examples of software branching that resemble this inverted tree before so I'm wondering what the norm for a situation like this?

    Read the article

  • Oracle SCM at APICS Denver Oct 14-16

    - by Stephen Slade
    Join us in Denver, October 14–16, 2012, for the 2012 APICS International Conference & Expo. One of the world's largest gatherings of supply chain and operations management professionals, APICS provides an annual interactive learning environment for operations and supply chain professionals to lead and apply best practices. For those of you considering attending APICS  next month, be sure to keep Oracle Supply Chain applications on your radar. Oracle will again have a prominent position at the annual global conference. Our product booth with have supply chain demonstrations for manufacturing, value chain planning, value chain execution and Agile product lifecycle management offerings. Stop by our booth to register for one of numerous prizes and awards and chat with one of our supply chain product experts. Oracle customers will be presenting at various sessions throughout the event.  One of the great stories to be shared is the SUN supply chain transformation. For those interested in moving costs down to the bottom line, this is the session you should attend. http://www.apics.org/sites/conference/2012/home

    Read the article

  • Is there an SCM tool made for solo programmers with key logging built in?

    - by pokstad
    Are there any Source Code Management (SCM) tools made specifically for solo programmers or small groups of programmers that tracks every small change made to source code in real time? This would require all key strokes to be tracked, and any other small changes like GUI UI editing. This seems like it would be a very useful tool for a programmer trying to remember a fix he did an hour ago that they didn't manually commit.

    Read the article

  • Plastic SCM vs. SVN

    - by jon37
    I'm currently researching new source control options for a team of 10 developers. We do .net development in Visual Studio 2008. We currently use VSS for source control. We are looking for a centralized source control solution(non-distributed), with a nice Visual Studio plugin. My manager has recommended Plastic SCM and I've always heard good things about Subversion. I'm trying to decide if we should adopt Subversion or Plastic SCM. There isn't much information out there about Plastic SCM (except what they've written) and I was wondering if it would be a good solution. They make it sound as if branching is much simpler. Subversion on the other hand has a robust, mature community, and it has been thoroughly field tested. What are the pros and cons to these tools? Also are there any other tools that you could suggest? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Maven freezes while perfoming scm:update on VSS

    - by Alex
    Im trying to get source files from VSS using Maven. But when I execute command mvn -DvssDirectory="C:\Program Files\VisualSourceSafe\win32" scm:update the log goes to [INFO] [scm:update {execution: default-cli}] [INFO] Executing: cmd.exe /X /C ""C:\Program Files\VisualSourceSafe\win32\ss" Get $/TEST -R -I- -GWS" [INFO] Working directory: C:\temp\test and then nothing happens. No error, no success. Can someone advice how to proceed with downloading sources from VSS?

    Read the article

  • Which SCM/VCS cope well with moving text between files?

    - by pfctdayelise
    We are having havoc with our project at work, because our VCS is doing some awful merging when we move information across files. The scenario is thus: You have lots of files that, say, contain information about terms from a dictionary, so you have a file for each letter of the alphabet. Users entering terms blindly follow the dictionary order, so they will put an entry like "kick the bucket" under B if that is where the dictionary happened to list it (or it might have been listed under both B, bucket and K, kick). Later, other users move the terms to their correct files. Lots of work is being done on the dictionary terms all the time. e.g. User A may have taken the B file and elaborated on the "kick the bucket" entry. User B took the B and K files, and moved the "kick the bucket" entry to the K file. Whichever order they end up getting committed in, the VCS will probably lose entries and not "figure out" that an entry has been moved. (These entries are later automatically converted to an SQL database. But they are kept in a "human friendly" form for working on them, with lots of comments, examples etc. So it is not acceptable to say "make your users enter SQL directly".) It is so bad that we have taken to almost manually merging these kinds of files now, because we can't trust our VCS. :( So what is the solution? I would love to hear that there is a VCS that could cope with this. Or a better merge algorithm? Or otherwise, maybe someone can suggest a better workflow or file arrangement to try and avoid this problem?

    Read the article

  • Custom capistrano task for working with scm repository

    - by Trevor
    Is there any way to create a custom capistrano task for performing other actions on a scm repository? For instance, I would like to create a task that will checkout a particular folder from my repository and then symlink it into the shared/ directory of the main project on my server. I know this can be done by creating a task and explicity defining the "svn co ..." command along with the scm username, password, and repository location. But this would display the password in plain text. Are there any built-in capistrano variables/methods that would help in this process?

    Read the article

  • Maven mercurial extension constantly fails

    - by TheLQ
    After 2+ hours I was able to get the maven-scm-provider-hg extension (for pushing to mercurial repos from Maven) semi working, meaning that it was executing commands instead of just giving errors. However I think I've run into a wall with this error [INFO] [deploy:deploy {execution: default-deploy}] [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from pircbotx.googlecode.com [INFO] Removing C:\DOCUME~1\Owner\LOCALS~1\Temp\wagon-scm1210107000.checkout\pir cbotx\pircbotx\1.3-SNAPSHOT [INFO] EXECUTING: cmd.exe /X /C "hg clone -r tip https://*SNIP*@site.pircbotx.googlecode.com/hg/maven2/snapshots/pircbotx/pircbotx/1.3-SNAPSHOT C:\DOCUME~1\Owner\LOCALS~1\Temp\wagon-scm1210107000.checkout\pircbotx\pircbotx\1.3-SNAPSHOT" [INFO] EXECUTING: cmd.exe /X /C "hg locate" [INFO] repository metadata for: 'snapshot pircbotx:pircbotx:1.3-SNAPSHOT' could not be found on repository: pircbotx.googlecode.com, so will be created Uploading: scm:hg:https://site.pircbotx.googlecode.com/hg/maven2/snapshots/pircbotx/pircbotx/1.3-SNAPSHOT/pircbotx-1.3-SNAPSHOT.jar [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Error deploying artifact: Error listing repository: No such command 'list'. What on earth would cause that error? I'm on a Windows box, so any commands that aren't commands give "'list' is not recognized as an internal or external command...", not "No such command 'list'." POM <build> <extensions> <extension> <groupId>org.apache.maven.scm</groupId> <artifactId>maven-scm-provider-hg</artifactId> <version>1.4</version> </extension> <extension> <groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId> <artifactId>wagon-scm</artifactId> <version>1.0-beta-7</version> </extension> </extensions> ... <distributionManagement> <snapshotRepository> <id>pircbotx.googlecode.com</id> <name>PircBotX Site</name> <url>scm:hg:https://site.pircbotx.googlecode.com/hg/maven2/snapshots</url> <uniqueVersion>false</uniqueVersion> </snapshotRepository> </distributionManagement> Mercurial version W:\programming\pircbot-hg>hg version Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.7.2) Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • SVN Externals in a different SCM

    - by Sean Chambers
    At a previous workplace we used svn externals to update dependent projects when a shared component was updated. This made it easy to see anything that those changes broke, as well as update dependent projects to the latest version of a shared component automatically without any intervention. At a new workplace we are using cc.net with surround scm and I'm trying to find something similar in surround. I haven't found anything like externals, only "shared files", but unlike externals, the shared files doesn't allow you to point at a specific revision of a file for the external. I'm interested in what other people are doing in these scenarios to lean on their continuous integration and treat it more for integration than a "continuous build" server. Does anyone know of a tool or something to do "externals" behavior without using svn? I suppose having an xml registry file of which projects depend on which assemblies and if they should be using the latest version but this seems like overkill.

    Read the article

  • How to generate build no with SVN revision no & Maven buildNumber plugin.

    - by Binit jha
    Hi, I am using mvn buildNumber plugin to generate build no with latest svn revision no. But, our version is not resolve to ${buildNumber} in the duration of installing in .m2 local reposotry. here is the our pom details: <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>com.hp.cloudprint</groupId> <artifactId>testutils</artifactId> <name>testutils</name> <version>6.3.rel.${buildNumber}</version> <description>This jar contains some helper classes which can simplify the writing of JUnit test cases.</description> <dependencies> <plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>buildnumber-maven-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <id>useLastCommittedRevision</id> <phase>validate</phase> <goals> <goal>create</goal> </goals> </execution> </executions> <configuration> <doCheck>false</doCheck> <doUpdate>true</doUpdate> <getRevisionOnlyOnce>true</getRevisionOnlyOnce> </configuration> </plugin> <scm> <connection>scm:svn:https://acn-platform</connection> <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://abc-platform/trunk</developerConnection> </scm>. </project> Building jar: C:\Documents and Settings\hpadmin\workspace\testutils\target\testutils-6.3.rel.2930.jar [INFO] [install:install] [INFO] Installing C:\Documents and Settings\hpadmin\workspace\testutils\target\testutils-6.3.rel.2930.jar to C:\Documents and Settings\jhab.m2*\repository\com\hp\cloudprint\testutils\6.3.rel.${buildNumber}\testutils-6.3.rel.${buildNumber}.jar** [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL Target generated correct jar. testutil-6.3.rel.2297.jar* Thanks in advance Binit

    Read the article

  • How to generate build no with SVN revision no & Maven buildNumber plugin

    - by Binit jha
    I am using mvn buildNumber plugin to generate build no with latest svn revision no. But, our version is not resolve to ${buildNumber} in the duration of installing in .m2 local reposotry. here is the our pom details: <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>com.hp.cloudprint</groupId> <artifactId>testutils</artifactId> <name>testutils</name> <version>6.3.rel.${buildNumber}</version> <description>This jar contains some helper classes which can simplify the writing of JUnit test cases.</description> <dependencies> <plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>buildnumber-maven-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <id>useLastCommittedRevision</id> <phase>validate</phase> <goals> <goal>create</goal> </goals> </execution> </executions> <configuration> <doCheck>false</doCheck> <doUpdate>true</doUpdate> <getRevisionOnlyOnce>true</getRevisionOnlyOnce> </configuration> </plugin> <scm> <connection>scm:svn:https://acn-platform</connection> <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://abc-platform/trunk</developerConnection> </scm>. </project> Building jar: C:\Documents and Settings\hpadmin\workspace\testutils\target\testutils-6.3.rel.2930.jar [INFO] [install:install] [INFO] Installing C:\Documents and Settings\hpadmin\workspace\testutils\target\testutils-6.3.rel.2930.jar to C:\Documents and Settings\jhab.m2*\repository\com\hp\cloudprint\testutils\6.3.rel.${buildNumber}\testutils-6.3.rel.${buildNumber}.jar** [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL Target generated correct jar. testutil-6.3.rel.2297.jar* Thanks in advance Binit

    Read the article

  • BES Express - configure MDS to push messages from 3rd party web application

    - by Max Gontar
    Hi! I have developed IIS web service to send PAP messages using Blackberry Push API over MDS. And there is an application installed on device, configured to receive push messages on appropriate port. Everything works well on MDS simulator. But it's not working well in real environment: I have installed BES Express and register several devices. I can browse MDS url with appropriate port, so url is correct. Also port enabled for reliable pushes is used in push message and in device application. Here is MDS simulator log: <2011-01-12 14:00:03.456 EET>:[272]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = PapServlet: request from 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 564 bytes...> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.476 EET>:[273]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Mapping PAP request to push request for pushID:pushID:asdas> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.479 EET>:[274]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = PushServlet: POST request from [UNKNOWN @ 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] to [PAPDEST=WAPPUSH%3D2100000A%253A100%2FTYPE%3DUSER%40rim.net&PORT=100&REQUESTURI=/] : -1 bytes...> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.480 EET>:[275]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = submitting push message with id:pushID:asdas> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.482 EET>:[276]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Executing push submit command for pushID:pushID:asdas> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.483 EET>:[278]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Pushing message to: 2100000a> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.484 EET>:[279]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Number of active push connections:1> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.489 EET>:[280]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = added server-initiated connection = -872546301, push id = pushID:asdas> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.491 EET>:[281]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Available threads in DefaultJobPool = 9 running JobRunner: DefaultJobRunner-7> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.494 EET>:[282]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = ReceivedFromServer, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION => <2011-01-12 14:00:03.494 EET>:[282]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = ReceivedFromServer, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = [Transmission Line Section]:> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.494 EET>:[282]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = ReceivedFromServer, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = POST / HTTP/1.1> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.494 EET>:[282]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = ReceivedFromServer, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = [Headers Section]: 8 headers> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.494 EET>:[282]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = ReceivedFromServer, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = [Parameters Section]: 3 parameters> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.499 EET>:[283]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = SentToDevice, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION => <2011-01-12 14:00:03.499 EET>:[283]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = SentToDevice, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = [Transmission Line Section]:> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.499 EET>:[283]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = SentToDevice, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = POST / HTTP/1.1> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.499 EET>:[283]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = SentToDevice, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = [Headers Section]: 9 headers> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.499 EET>:[283]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, HANDLER = HTTP, EVENT = SentToDevice, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, HTTPTRANSMISSION = [Parameters Section]: 3 parameters> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.501 EET>:[284]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Finished JobRunner: DefaultJobRunner-7, available threads in DefaultJobPool = 10, time spent = 8ms> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.521 EET>:[287]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = CreatedSendingQueue, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.526 EET>:[290]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = Sending, TAG = 1288699908, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a, VERSION = 16, CONNECTIONID = -872546301, SEQUENCE = 0, TYPE = NOTIFY-REQUEST, CONNECTIONHANDLER = http, PROTOCOL = TCP, PARAMETERS = [MGONTAR/10.10.0.35:100], SIZE = 339> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.531 EET>:[291]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Number of active push connections:0> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.591 EET>:[292]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = Notification, TAG = 1288699908, STATE = DELIVERED> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.600 EET>:[296]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, EVENT = Device connections: AVG latency (msecs)79> <2011-01-12 14:00:03.600 EET>:[297]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, Removed push connection:-872546301> <2011-01-12 14:00:07.015 EET>:[298]:<MDS-CS_MDS>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = RemovedSendingQueue, DEVICEPIN = 2100000a> And here is real MDS log: <2011-01-12 11:35:02.763 GMT>:[3932]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, PapServlet: request from 192.168.1.241 583 bytes...> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.897 GMT>:[3933]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Mapping PAP request to push request for pushID:pushID:sdfsdfwerwer> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.909 GMT>:[3934]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, PushServlet: POST request from [UNKNOWN @ 192.168.1.241] to [PAPDEST=WAPPUSH%3D22D7F6BD%253A7874%2FTYPE%3DUSER%40rim.net&PORT=7874&REQUESTURI=/]> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.909 GMT>:[3934]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<push id: pushID:sdfsdfwerwer> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.910 GMT>:[3935]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, submitting push message with id:pushID:sdfsdfwerwer> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.910 GMT>:[3936]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Executing push submit command for pushID:pushID:sdfsdfwerwer> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.911 GMT>:[3937]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Pushing message to: 22d7f6bd> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.912 GMT>:[3938]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Number of active push connections:1> <2011-01-12 11:35:02.931 GMT>:[3939]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, added server-initiated connection = -1848311806, push id = pushID:sdfsdfwerwer> <2011-01-12 11:35:03.240 GMT>:[3940]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = CreatedSendingQueue, DEVICEPIN = 22d7f6bd, USERID = u3> <2011-01-12 11:35:03.241 GMT>:[3941]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = Sending, TAG = 536543251, DEVICEPIN = 22d7f6bd, USERID = u3, VERSION = 16, CONNECTIONID = -1848311806, SEQUENCE = 0, TYPE = NOTIFY-REQUEST, CONNECTIONHANDLER = http, PROTOCOL = TCP, PARAMETERS = [LDN-Server1/192.168.1.240:7874], SIZE = 383> <2011-01-12 11:35:03.241 GMT>:[3942]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Number of active push connections:0> <2011-01-12 11:35:03.253 GMT>:[3943]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SRP, SRPID = S27700165[LDN-SERVER1:3200], EVENT = Sending, VERSION = 1, COMMAND = SEND, TAG = 536543251, SIZE = 570> <2011-01-12 11:35:03.838 GMT>:[3944]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SRP, SRPID = S27700165[LDN-SERVER1:3200], EVENT = Receiving, VERSION = 1, COMMAND = STATUS, TAG = 536543251, SIZE = 10, STATE = DELIVERED> <2011-01-12 11:35:04.104 GMT>:[3945]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = Notification, TAG = 536543251, STATE = DELIVERED> <2011-01-12 11:35:04.121 GMT>:[3946]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Device connections: AVG latency (msecs)893> <2011-01-12 11:35:04.135 GMT>:[3947]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<INFO >:<LAYER = IPPP, DEVICEPIN = 22d7f6bd, DOMAINNAME = LDN-Server1/192.168.1.240, CONNECTION_TYPE = PUSH_CONN, ConnectionId = -1848311806, DURATION(ms) = 1151, MFH_KBytes = 0, MTH_KBytes = 0.374, MFH_PACKET_COUNT = 0, MTH_PACKET_COUNT = 1> <2011-01-12 11:35:04.144 GMT>:[3948]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, Removed push connection:-1848311806> <2011-01-12 11:35:09.264 GMT>:[3949]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = IPPP, EVENT = RemovedSendingQueue, DEVICEPIN = 22d7f6bd, USERID = u3> <2011-01-12 11:35:58.187 GMT>:[3950]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SRP, SRPID = S27700165[LDN-SERVER1:3200], EVENT = Sending, VERSION = 1, COMMAND = INFO, SIZE = 46> <2011-01-12 11:35:58.187 GMT>:[3951]:<MDS-CS_LDN-SERVER1_MDS-CS_1>:<DEBUG>:<LAYER = SCM, Sent health to S27700165[LDN-SERVER1:3200] Health=[0x 0000 0007 0000 0000],Mask=[0x 0000 0007 0000 0000],Load=[60]> As you can see, logs not really differs, message is marked as delivered. But my app on device not really gets this message (as it works in mds simulator) Please advice me, what may be wrong? Is there some certificate to install or security settings I should configure to make this push message came to device application? Thank you! same question on bbforums

    Read the article

  • Accurev SCM

    - by FlySwat
    Does anyone use Accurev for Source Control Management? We are switching (eventually) from StarTeam to Accurev. My initial impression is that the GUI tool is severely lacking, however the underlying engine, and the branches as streams concept is incredible. The biggest difficulty we are facing is assessing our own DIY tools that interfaced with starteam, and either replacing them with DIY new tools, or finding and purchasing appropriate replacements. Additionally, is anyone using the AccuWork component for Issue management? Starteam had a very nice change request system, and AccuWork does not come close to matching it. We are evaluating either using Accuwork, or buying a 3rd party package such as JIRA. Opinions?

    Read the article

  • Gestire la relazione con il fornitore: strategie, processi, strumenti

    - by antonella.buonagurio(at)oracle.com
    Si é svolto il 3 Marzo un interessante incontro sul tema delle relazioni fra fornitori ed ufficio acquisti. Cesare Businelli , Direttore Generale Italia dell' European Institute of Purchasing Management ha illustrato, in un tempo purtoppo inferiore al necessario, come gestire le relazioni e la collaborazione con i fornitori strategici per creare valore, portando numerosi esempi di successo e stimolando l'uditorio, composto dai responsabili acquisti di piu di 20 aziende. A seguire Lino Campofiorito - Procurement Solutions Sales Consultant di Oracle ha illustrato alcune delle soluzioni informatiche a supporto. Qui potrete trovare le slides. Al termine dell'incontro molte domande per i relatori a conferma dell'interesse del tema.  Oracle Procurement Channel View more presentations from antobng82.

    Read the article

  • My Doors - Why Standards Matter to Business

    - by Brian Dayton
    "Standards save money." "Standards accelerate projects." "Standards make better solutions."   What do these statements mean to you? You buy technology solutions like Oracle Applications but you're a business person--trying to close the quarter, get performance reviews processed, negotiate a new sourcing contract, etc.   When "standards" come up in presentations and discussions do you: -          Nod your head politely -          Tune out and check your smart phone -          Turn to your IT counterpart and say "Bob's all over this standards thing, right Bob?"   Here's why standards matter. My wife wants new external doors downstairs, ones that would get more light into the rooms. Am I OK with that? "Uhh, sure...it's a little dark in the kitchen."   -          24 hours ago - wife calls to tell me that she's going to the hardware store and may look at doors -          20 hours ago - wife pulls into driveway, informs me that two doors are in the back of her station wagon, ready for me to carry -          19 hours ago - I re-discovered the fact that it's not fun to carry a solid wood door by myself -          5 hours ago - Local handyman, who was at our house anyway, tells me that the doors we bought will likely cost 2-3x the material cost in installation time and labor...the doors are standard but our doorways aren't   We could have done more research. I could be more handy. Sure. But the fact is, my 1951 house wasn't built with me in mind. They built what worked and called it a day.   The same holds true with a lot of business applications. They were designed and architected for one-time use with one use-case in mind. Today's business climate is different. If you're going to use your processes and technology to differentiate your business you should have at least a working knowledge of: -          How standards can benefit your business -          Your IT organization's philosophy around standards -          Your vendor's track-record around standards...and watch for those who pay lip-service to standards but don't follow through   The rallying cry in most IT organizations today is "learn more about the business, drop the acronyms." I'm not advocating that you go out and learn how to code in Java. But I do believe it will help your business and your decision-making process if you meet IT ½...even ¼ of the way there.   Epilogue: The door project has been put on hold and yours truly has to return the doors to the hardware store tomorrow.

    Read the article

  • Fabbrica Futuro Nord-Est

    - by Paolo Leveghi
     Il 27 giugno a Verona si è tenuta la seconda edizione di Fabbrica Futuro dedicata all’area Nord Est d’Italia rivolta a tutti gli attori del mercato manifatturiero che ha voluto mettere a confronto idee, raccontare casi di eccellenza e proporre soluzioni concrete per, come recita il sottotitolo del progetto, l’azienda manifatturiera del domani, e in particolare per le aziende produttrici del Triveneto.All’evento sono intervenute un centinaio di persone, in prevalenza Imprenditori e Manager di linea di aziende appartenenti al settore manifatturiero italiano, con una redemption tra iscritti e presenti di poco inferiore al 50% (48,7%). La dimensione aziendale maggiormente rappresentata dai visitatori presenti è la media azienda produttrice del tessuto manifatturiero italiano.I giudizi espressi dai partecipanti che hanno compilato il questionario di feedback, raccontano di un’esperienza positiva sia in termini organizzativi che di contenuto delle relazioni proposte e del livello dei relatori. La giornata ha visto infatti l’esposizione di 17 interventi, tutti in un’unica sessione plenaria, per un totale di 19 relatori tra accademici, utenti e rappresentanti di aziende del mercato dell’offerta.Altro segnale di forte interesse all’evento è stato il numero di richieste per l’attivazione alla newsletter al sito www.fabbricafuturo.it grazie alla quale si può essere costantemente aggiornati sui nuovi contenuti pubblicati e su tutti i prossimi appuntamenti in calendario. A breve inoltre verranno resi disponibili anche i contenuti video filmati durante tutta la sessione plenaria.Il pubblico coinvolto fino ad ora, oltre ad esprimere grande soddisfazione per i contenuti di carattere generale espressi da Fabbrica Futuro, ha chiesto di affiancare a temi più generali approfondimenti più mirati e casi pratici relativi a settori specifici. Da questa esigenza nascono gli “incontri verticali” di Fabbrica Futuro, cinque incontri di approfondimento su specifici temi di interesse per le aziende manifatturiere e che focalizzano le esigenze di specifici mercati di questo settore. Oracle ha partecipato con Sergio Gimelli, che ha parlato dei vantaggi che le aziende possono ottenere adottando un'architettura Cloud per i loro sistemi, portando degli interessanti esempi. .htmtableborders, .htmtableborders td, .htmtableborders th {border : 1px dashed lightgrey ! important;} html, body { border: 0px; } body { background-color: #ffffff; } img, hr { cursor: default }

    Read the article

  • Beyond S&OP: Integrated Business Planning

    - by Paul Homchick
    In most corporations, planning is done at the department level — leaving disconnects and gaps across different departments. Finance sets revenue and profit goals with minimum validation from Manufacturing that the company has the resources, material, capacity, or demand to reach these goals. On the operations side, Manufacturing is developing plans to balance demand and supply but seldom knows if the resulting "plan" will meet the budgets on which the company's revenue and profit goals are based. The Sales department agrees to quotas that meet Finance's revenue goals without a complete understanding of what manufacturing can deliver. Integrated Business Planning (IBP) bridges these gaps in corporate planning systems. Integrated Business Planning integrates the financial planning provided by EPM systems with operations planning provided by Sales and Operations Planning solutions. This means that revenue goals and budgets are validated against a bottom-up operating plan, and that the operating plan is reconciled against financial goals. When detailed changes are made to the operations plan, planners can immediately see the big picture impact of the changes. IBP also addresses one the CFO's big concerns—the reliability of the revenue forecast. Operating plans are updated daily or weekly from a precise forecast based on current market conditions. These updated plans are then made available so that financial analysts are working with data that best represents what is going to happen - not what they projected would happen based on last quarter's data. For a discussion in more depth, see my article: Improve Reliability of Financial Forecasts with Integrated Business Planning in Supply & Demand Chain-Executive Magazine.

    Read the article

  • I manager della logistica a confronto

    - by Paolo Leveghi
    Il 4 di Aprile scorso una quindicina di manager della logistica appartenenti a diversi settori industriali (Retail, Consumer Goods, Natural Resources, etc) si sono ritrovati per un workshop di lavoro oganizzato da Oracle con la collaborazione di Assologistica. Il tema era libero: di cosa avreste bisogno per migliorare la logistica delle vostre aziende?  La discussione è stata viva e durata per più di tre ore. Gli spunti della serata, assieme a quelli che verranno fuori dall'analogo incontro che si svolgerà il 18 Aprile prossimo, saranno parte di una presentazione che verrà preparata da Assologistica e distribuita al suo network.

    Read the article

  • To branch or not to branch?

    - by Idsa
    Till recently my development workflow was the following: Get the feature from product owner Make a branch (if feature is more than 1 day) Implement it in a branch Merge changes from main branch to my branch (to reduce conflicts during backward merging) Merge my branch back to main branch Sometimes there were problems with merging, but in general I liked it. But recently I see more and more followers of idea to not make branches as it makes more difficult to practice continuous integration, continuous delivery, etc. And it sounds especially funny from people with distributed VCS background who were talking so much about great merging implementations of Git, Mercurial, etc. So the question is should we use branches nowadays?

    Read the article

  • Github Workflow: Pushing small fix branches to remote, or keep them local?

    - by Isaac Hodes
    In Scott Chacon's workflow (explained eg in this SO answer), with essentially two silos (development, and master), if, say I have a small bug to fix (e.g. can be fixed with a few characters) is the optimal way of doing that: a) branch off of development a branch called e.g. fix_123. Push this branch to origin as I work on it. When it's done, code-reviewed, whatever, merge into development and push development to origin. b) Same as above, but without pushing fix_123 to origin.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >