Search Results

Search found 499 results on 20 pages for 'hotspot shield'.

Page 2/20 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • cset shield --kthread on: should I use this?

    - by lori
    I'm reading up on cpu shielding using Alex Tsariounov's cset utility here: https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cpuset_Management_Utility/tutorial In the tutorial I'm finding the wording around migrating kernel threads from having access to all cpus to running only in a certain cpuset a bit ambiguous The tutorial says the following: Some kernel threads can be moved into the unshielded system cpuset as well. These are the threads that are not bound to specific CPUs. If a kernel thread is bound to a specific CPU, then it is generally not a good idea to move that thread to the system set because at worst it may hang the system and at best it will slow the system down significantly. These threads are usually the IRQ threads on a real time Linux kernel, for example, and you may want to not move these kernel threads into system. If you leave them in the root cpuset, then they will have access to all CPUs. The tutorial then goes on to say: However, if your application demands an even "quieter" shield, then you can move all movable kernel threads into the unshielded system set with the following command. [zuul:cpuset-trunk]# cset shield -k on cset: --> activating kthread shielding cset: kthread shield activated, moving 70 tasks into system cpuset... [==================================================]% cset: done I am confused by this final sentence. By using the word however, it seems to suggest that you typically should not move the movable kernel threads into the unshielded system set. Is this the case, or is it safe to move kernel threads which can be moved into a cpuset, thereby preventing them from running on some cpus?

    Read the article

  • Wifi hotspot disconnected after some time

    - by Rohit Bansal
    I am trying to use my Ubuntu system as Wifi Hotspot, but for some reason Hotspot get disconnected on its own. Searching for the solution, I found this help : Why is my ethernet connection connecting and disconnecting repeatedly? Reading through the above article I used the following command sudo killall dnsmasq as a result I manage to establish hotspot for around 5-10 sec before getting disconnected as against immediately.... Here's the system log (in case needed) tail -f /var/log/syslog : Apr 1 23:31:42 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Starting dnsmasq... Apr 1 23:31:42 NetworkManager[901]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: ip-config -> activated (reason 'none') [70 100 0] Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq[4159]: started, version 2.57 cachesize 150 Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq[4159]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus I18N DHCP TFTP IDN Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq-dhcp[4159]: DHCP, IP range 10.42.43.10 -- 10.42.43.100, lease time 1h Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq[4159]: reading /etc/resolv.conf Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq[4159]: using nameserver 220.226.6.104#53 Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq[4159]: using nameserver 220.226.100.40#53 Apr 1 23:31:42 dnsmasq[4159]: cleared cache Apr 1 23:31:42 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) successful, device activated. Apr 1 23:31:42 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) complete. Apr 1 23:31:42 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP4 Configure Get) complete. Apr 1 23:31:42 dbus[885]: [system] Activating service name='org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' (using servicehelper) Apr 1 23:31:42 dbus[885]: [system] Successfully activated service 'org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' Connection established at this point....now disconnecting after 10 sec... Apr 1 23:31:52 ntpdate[4194]: adjust time server 91.189.94.4 offset -0.011589 sec Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> (wlan0): IP6 addrconf timed out or failed. Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP6 Configure Timeout) scheduled... Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP6 Configure Timeout) started... Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) started... Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol tcp --destination-port 53 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol udp --destination-port 53 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol tcp --destination-port 67 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol udp --destination-port 67 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --in-interface wlan0 --jump REJECT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --out-interface wlan0 --jump REJECT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --in-interface wlan0 --out-interface wlan0 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --source 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --in-interface wlan0 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --destination 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --out-interface wlan0 --match state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table nat --insert POSTROUTING --source 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 ! --destination 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --jump MASQUERADE Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol tcp --destination-port 53 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol udp --destination-port 53 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol tcp --destination-port 67 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert INPUT --in-interface wlan0 --protocol udp --destination-port 67 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --in-interface wlan0 --jump REJECT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --out-interface wlan0 --jump REJECT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --in-interface wlan0 --out-interface wlan0 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --source 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --in-interface wlan0 --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table filter --insert FORWARD --destination 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --out-interface wlan0 --match state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED --jump ACCEPT Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Executing: /sbin/iptables --table nat --insert POSTROUTING --source 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 ! --destination 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --jump MASQUERADE Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Starting dnsmasq... Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) complete. Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP6 Configure Timeout) complete. Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <warn> dnsmasq died with signal 9 Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: activated -> failed (reason 'sharing-start-failed') [100 120 18] Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq[4235]: started, version 2.57 cachesize 150 Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq[4235]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus I18N DHCP TFTP IDN Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq-dhcp[4235]: DHCP, IP range 10.42.43.10 -- 10.42.43.100, lease time 1h Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <warn> Activation (wlan0) failed for access point (Reppify Ubuntu) Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq[4235]: reading /etc/resolv.conf Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq[4235]: using nameserver 220.226.6.104#53 Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq[4235]: using nameserver 220.226.100.40#53 Apr 1 23:32:01 dnsmasq[4235]: cleared cache Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <warn> Activation (wlan0) failed. Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: failed -> disconnected (reason 'none') [120 30 0] Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <info> (wlan0): deactivating device (reason 'none') [0] Apr 1 23:32:01 dbus[885]: [system] Activating service name='org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' (using servicehelper) Apr 1 23:32:01 dbus[885]: [system] Successfully activated service 'org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' Apr 1 23:32:01 NetworkManager[901]: <error> [1333303321.565351] [nm-device-wifi.c:1815] nm_device_wifi_set_mode(): (wlan0): error setting mode 2

    Read the article

  • hotspot in ubuntu 12.10 using hostapd unable to connect other devices

    - by MuffinStateWide
    I've created a hotspot using hostapd ad I cant connect any other device to it.all i get are a mixture of 3 errors unable to connect to kernel driver unable to set beacon parameters (which are set in my config file) or I get stuck at the authentication stage and it times out I'm using a TP-Link wireless N PCI card WN-951N (which does not support master mode) and the version provided by ubuntu in the repos. ps. this setup worked flawlessly in 12.04 LTS Any extra information, just let me know and i'll get it to you ASAP

    Read the article

  • 5 Open Source Wi-Fi Hotspot Solutions

    <b>LinuxPlanet: </b>"Whether you're wanting to give away or charge your visitors for the wireless Internet, you should find something that will work. The best part is that most of these solutions are free -- you don't have to spends hundreds on a off-the-shelf hotspot gateway."

    Read the article

  • Updating Mcafee Group Shield on Exchange Server

    - by AllanPedersen
    So I don't actually have a problem yet, but I might. You see my fathers company have 10 computers and an exchange server with Mcafee Group Shield. lately they've had issues with mails from customers being blocked. I found both the problem and the solution: Mcafee update so basicly update their Mcafee group shield to the newest service pack and we are all back in buisness.. while I have some limited exchange experience and AD too. I don't have any Mcafee experience. I don't wanna crash their server for a week and have them need to get someone to recover it. So my question in here.. is it supposedly as easy as to click an 'update' button and to reboot your server.. or are there several issues I need to be aware about..? Maybe there is some common issue that goes with updating antivirus on an exchange server that I don't know about..

    Read the article

  • Remove "Security Shield" (win XP)? [closed]

    - by ALTT
    Possible Duplicate: Computer is infected by a virus or a malware, what do I do now? I have a problem with "Security Shield". They pop up every 5 min and tell me that there are many viruses in my computer, that I should buy their license.. I have installed Sophos and don't want "Security Shield". But I didn't find any way to get rid up it. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Sorry if I repeat the question from someone. If so, please show me the link.

    Read the article

  • Wifi hotspot to connect to Android using non-AP supported cards

    - by 3l4ng
    I'm running Ubuntu 13.10 64b on a Dell Inspiron N5010. My wireless device (found using lspci) is Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01). I bought a new android phone and want to connect to Internet by using the laptop as a Wireless Access Point (ad-hoc doesn't work with Android). I tried following tutorials like the one at How to setup a wi-fi hotspot (access point mode)?. The relevant output from iw list was Supported interface modes: * IBSS * managed Running sudo hostapd /path/to/conf/file gave me (eth1 is the wireless, verified by iwconfig) Failed to create interface mon.eth1: -95 (Operation not supported) Could not set channel for kernel driver eth1: Unable to setup interface. Could not connect to kernel driver. I am able to use Connectify and Virtualrouter on Windows, and the phone works great. How do I get an access point running on Ubuntu? I'm open to other alternatives as well.

    Read the article

  • Cannot connect to Open WiFi hotspot created by Android

    - by Bibhas
    I'm trying to share my 3G data connection via WiFi hotspot. I have an open Hotspot running on my phone(Xperia Neo V - MT11i - Android 2.3.4). But I cannot connect to it from my Ubuntu system. Here is the syslog while I try to connect to it - NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) starting connection 'TheNeo' NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: disconnected -> prepare (reason 'none') [30 40 0] NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started... NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete. NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) starting... NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: prepare -> config (reason 'none') [40 50 0] NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0/wireless): connection 'TheNeo' requires no security. No secrets needed. NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Config: added 'ssid' value 'TheNeo' NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Config: added 'scan_ssid' value '1' NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Config: added 'key_mgmt' value 'NONE' NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. NetworkManager[1077]: <info> Config: set interface ap_scan to 1 NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): supplicant interface state: inactive -> scanning wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): supplicant interface state: scanning -> authenticating kernel: [17498.113553] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17498.310138] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17498.510069] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17498.710083] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17504.779927] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17504.976420] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17505.176379] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17505.376314] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17511.478385] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17511.674738] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17511.874655] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17512.074659] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17518.152643] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17518.349064] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17518.549051] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17518.748999] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17524.858896] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17525.055404] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17525.255387] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17525.455254] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17531.589176] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17531.785747] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17531.985724] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17532.185610] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17538.329257] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17538.528003] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17538.728024] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17538.927922] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17545.022036] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17545.218339] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17545.418319] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17545.618206] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out wpa_supplicant[29352]: Trying to authenticate with 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (SSID='TheNeo' freq=2462 MHz) kernel: [17551.724177] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 1/3) kernel: [17551.920685] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 2/3) kernel: [17552.120597] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f (try 3/3) kernel: [17552.320526] wlan0: direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out NetworkManager[1077]: <warn> Activation (wlan0/wireless): association took too long, failing activation. NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: config -> failed (reason 'supplicant-timeout') [50 120 11] NetworkManager[1077]: <warn> Activation (wlan0) failed for access point (TheNeo) NetworkManager[1077]: <warn> Activation (wlan0) failed. NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: failed -> disconnected (reason 'none') [120 30 0] NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): deactivating device (reason 'none') [0] NetworkManager[1077]: <info> (wlan0): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> disconnected NetworkManager[1077]: <warn> Couldn't disconnect supplicant interface: This interface is not connected. Why is direct probe to 5c:b5:24:2f:d1:2f timed out? Any idea?

    Read the article

  • Create a HotSpot which requires a username and password

    - by Trumbun
    I wish to set up a wireless access point which requires a username and password in order for clients to use the internet. The network setup will be internet modem connected to an Ubuntu Server (2 networks cards). The first network cards to get the internet to the server and the second network card to connect the the wifi hotspot. The server will host the software such as (Example software for windows) which will control the user connected by forcing them to login with the credentials given at the reception. Can some suggest some software that I can use? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Wifi Hotspot not created in ubuntu 12.04

    - by user2406568
    I am using Hp Pavillion g4 with braodcom wireledd adpater. I have the following hardware configuration, for lan and wifi eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 10:1f:74:b2:61:cc inet addr:10.3.10.45 Bcast:10.3.11.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: fe80::121f:74ff:feb2:61cc/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:190855 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:133209 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:77642990 (77.6 MB) TX bytes:25290447 (25.2 MB) Interrupt:44 Base address:0x6000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 38:59:f9:7d:d6:b2 inet addr:10.3.9.180 Bcast:10.3.11.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: fe80::3a59:f9ff:fe7d:d6b2/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:245562 errors:82 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:408011 TX packets:90383 errors:260 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:140772881 (140.7 MB) TX bytes:13041542 (13.0 MB) Interrupt:16 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:3230 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3230 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:435198 (435.1 KB) TX bytes:435198 (435.1 KB) whenever I click on create hotspot nothing happens. Any solution???

    Read the article

  • Is visiting HTTPS websites on a public hotspot secure?

    - by Calmarius
    It's often said that HTTPS SSL/TLS connections are encrypted and said to be secure because the communication between the server and me is encrypted (also provides server authentication) so if someone sniffs my packets, they will need zillions of years to decrypt if using brute force in theory. Let's assume I'm on a public wifi and there is a malicious user on the same wifi who sniffs every packet. Now let's assume I'm trying to access my gmail account using this wifi. My browser does a SSL/TLS handshake with the server and gets the keys to use for encryption and decryption. If that malicious user sniffed all my incoming and outgoing packets. Can he calculate the same keys and read my encrypted traffic too or even send encrypted messages to the server in my name?

    Read the article

  • How to setup a wifi ap hotspot with ipv6 support?

    - by keyman
    How to setup a wifi ap (access point mode) hotspot, with IPv6 support? I've set up a hotspot according to the guide to wifi ap hotspot setup and it works fine. But via the hotspot I failed to visit IPv6 websites. How can I setup a hotspot able to share Ipv6 Internet access? Thanks! Further: Actually I've tried to setup IPv6 forwarding and masquerading. First enabling IPv6 forwarding: echo 1 | sudo tee net/ipv6/conf/default/forwarding Then I tried to execute: sudo ip6tables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 2001:db8:0:1::/64 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE But it gave me an error: ip6tables v1.4.12: Couldn't load target `MASQUERADE':No such file or directory I searched through the Internet but I get confused. So I'm here for help. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • If Nvidia Shield can stream a game via wifi, why can I not do the same via ethernet to any other PC?

    - by Enigma
    I think it absurd that a wireless game streaming solution is the *first to hit the market when a 1000mbps+ Ethernet connection would accomplish the same feat with roughly 6x the available bandwidth. I can only assume that there must be some reason behind this or a limitation preventing this, but what? 150mbps wifi is in no way superior to a 1000mbps LAN connection aside from well wireless mobility. Not only that but I have a secondary laptop and desktop which should by hardware comparison completely outperform anything the Tegra in the Nvidia Shield can do. Is this all just a marketing scheme to force people to buy the shield for the streaming benefit? Chief among these is that NVIDIA’s Shield handheld game console will be getting a microconsole-like mode, dubbed “Shield Console Mode”, that will allow the handheld to be converted into a more traditional TV-connected console. In console mode Shield can be controlled with a Bluetooth controller, and in accordance with the higher resolution of TVs will accept 1080p game streaming from a suitably equipped PC, versus 720p in handheld mode. With that said 1080p streaming will require additional bandwidth, and while 720p can be done over WiFi NVIDIA will be requiring a hardline GigE connection for 1080p streaming (note that Shield doesn’t have Ethernet, so this is presumably being done over USB). Streaming aside, in console mode Shield will also support its traditional local gaming/application functionality. - http://www.anandtech.com/show/7435/nvidia-consolidates-game-streaming-tech-under-gamestream-brand-announces-shield-console-mode ^ This is not acceptable for me for a number of reasons not to mention the ridiculousness of having a little screen+controller unit sitting there while using a secondary controller and screen instead. That kind of redundant absurdity exemplifies how wrong of a solution that is. They need a second product for this solution without the screen or controller for it to make sense... at which point your just buying a little computer that does what most other larger computers do better. All that is required, by my understanding, is the ability to decode H.264 video compression and transmit control/feedback so by any logical comparison, one (Nvidia especially) should have no difficulty in creating an application for PC's (win32/64 environment) that does the exact same thing their android app does. I have 2 video cards capable of streaming (encoding) H.264 so by right they must be capable of decoding it I would think. I haven't found anything stating plans to allow non-shield owners to do this. Can a third party create this software or does it hinge on some limitation that only Nvidia can overcome? (*) - perhaps this isn't the first but afaik it is the first complete package.

    Read the article

  • Missing UAC shield overlay on desktop shortcut icon when created by msi created from VS 2008

    - by Alain Hogue
    I created a setup program to deploy my VBNet program using Visual Studio 2008. Inside this setup program I created a shortcut to the "primary output" to be installed on the user desktop. Now, everything is working correctly. The program is installed under "C:\Program Files" and the shortcut is created on the desktop. Also, when I use this shortcut I am prompted by UAC to autorize running this program as administrator. So far, so good... But! My desktop icon does not have the UAC shield overlay even if the program is compiled with the manifest stating that it must run as administrator. Also, if I manually create a new shortcut on the desktop to the same executable after the installation, this new shortcut WILL have the shield overlay! I have tried to reboot and delete the iconCache.db file but it did not work. So my question is: How can I have my desktop shortcut appear WITH the UAC shield overlay when installed initially. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to host an AP or a hotspot?

    - by user1048138
    I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 as a virtual machine on my Mac. Since I am unable to get the virtual machine to have full access to my WiFi card, I bought another USB WiFi card to use. This is my WiFi card. If you are unfamiliar with Virtual machine, as far as I know, since the Ubuntu has its own card now, it shouldn't matter. I have followed these guides with no luck: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/WirelessAccessPoint http://www.danbishop.org/2011/12/11/using-hostapd-to-add-wireless-access-point-capabilities-to-an-ubuntu-server/ The problem is that the WiFi connection appears on all of the machines that I have in my house: 2 iPhones, Dell machine running Ubuntu and two Macbooks. However the connection times out on all of these machines. Questions: Could this be a driver issue if that same WiFi card can connect to other WiFi points and use its internet Could this be DHCP related? I would think not. It should at least get a 169.X.X.X address? No? Any solutions for me?

    Read the article

  • Create a wifi hotspot in a place where an authentication is required

    - by SoftTimur
    I live in a residence where Internet is provided via cable. Once the computer is connected to the cable, launching a browser will trigger an authentication, I have a username and password to enter, then the internet will be connected. With a gateway (e.g. Wireless Cable Voice Gateway Model CBVG834G) and 2 cables, two PCs can connect to the Internet with my account at the same time. Now the question is, I don't like the cable, and would like to create a wifi hotspot. It seems realizable with the same gateway. According to the instruction on page 2-4 of the manual: Enter http://192.168.0.1 in the address field of your Internet browser. Log in to the gateway with either of the default user names, MSO or admin... However, while connecting to the Internet successfully via cable and the gateway (e.g. google works), opening 192.168.0.1 oddly gives me an error on the browser: Does anyone know what happened? Is it due to the authentication required by my residence? Is there any other way to build a hotspot of wifi? PS: My system is MAC OS

    Read the article

  • Create a wifi hotspot in a place where an authentication is required [closed]

    - by SoftTimur
    I live in a residence where Internet is provided via cable. Once the computer is connected to the cable, launching a browser will trigger an authentication, I have a username and password to enter, then the internet will be connected. With a gateway (e.g. Wireless Cable Voice Gateway Model CBVG834G) and 2 cables, two PCs can connect to the Internet with my account at the same time. Now the question is, I don't like the cable, and would like to create a wifi hotspot. It seems realizable with the same gateway. According to the instruction on page 2-4 of the manual: Enter http://192.168.0.1 in the address field of your Internet browser. Log in to the gateway with either of the default user names, MSO or admin... However, trying to open 192.168.0.1 gives me an error on the browser. Does anyone know what happened? Is it due to the authentication required by my residence? Is there any other way to build a hotspot of wifi? PS: My system is MAC OS

    Read the article

  • If Nvidia Shield can stream a game via WiFi (~150-300Mbps), where is the 1-10Gbps wired streaming?

    - by Enigma
    Facts: It is surprising and uncharacteristic that a wireless game streaming solution is the *first to hit the market when a 1000mbps+ Ethernet connection would accomplish the same feat with roughly 6x the available bandwidth. 150-300mbps WiFi is in no way superior to a 1000mbps+ LAN connection aside from well wireless mobility. Throughout time, (since the internet was created) wired services have **always come first yet in this particular case, the opposite seems to be true. We had wired internet first, wired audio streaming, and wired video streaming all before their wireless counterparts. Why? Largely because the wireless bandwidth was and is inferior. Even today despite being significantly better and capable of a lot more, it is still inferior to a wired connection. Situation: Chief among these is that NVIDIA’s Shield handheld game console will be getting a microconsole-like mode, dubbed “Shield Console Mode”, that will allow the handheld to be converted into a more traditional TV-connected console. In console mode Shield can be controlled with a Bluetooth controller, and in accordance with the higher resolution of TVs will accept 1080p game streaming from a suitably equipped PC, versus 720p in handheld mode. With that said 1080p streaming will require additional bandwidth, and while 720p can be done over WiFi NVIDIA will be requiring a hardline GigE connection for 1080p streaming (note that Shield doesn’t have Ethernet, so this is presumably being done over USB). Streaming aside, in console mode Shield will also support its traditional local gaming/application functionality. - http://www.anandtech.com/show/7435/nvidia-consolidates-game-streaming-tech-under-gamestream-brand-announces-shield-console-mode ^ This is not acceptable to me for a number of reasons not to mention the ridiculousness of having a little screen+controller unit sitting there while using a secondary controller and screen instead. That kind of redundant absurdity exemplifies how wrong of a solution that is. They need a second product for this solution without the screen or controller for it to make sense... at which point your just buying a little computer that does what most other larger computers do better. While this secondary project will provide a wired connection, it still shouldn't be necessary to purchase a Shield to have this benefit. Not only this but Intel's WiDi claims game streaming support as well - wirelessly. Where is the wired streaming? All that is required, by my understanding, is the ability to decode H.264 video compression and transmit control/feedback so by any logical comparison, one (Nvidia especially) should have no difficulty in creating an application for PC's (win32/64 environment) that does the exact same thing their android app does. I have 2 video cards capable of streaming (encoding) H.264 so by right they must be capable of decoding it I would think. I should be able to stream to my second desktop or my laptop both of which by hardware comparison are superior to the Shield. I haven't found anything stating plans to allow non-shield owners to do this. Can a third party create this software or does it hinge on some limitation that only Nvidia can overcome? Reiteration of questions: Is there a technical reason (non marketing) for why Nvidia opted to bottleneck the streaming service with a wireless connection limiting the resolution to 720p and introducing intermittent video choppiness when on a wired connection one could achieve, presumably, 1080p with significantly less or zero choppiness? Is there anything limiting developers from creating a PC/Desktop application emulating the same H.264 decoding functionality that circumvents the need to get an Nvidia Shield altogether? (It is not a matter of being too cheap to support Nvidia - I have many Nvidia cards that aren't being used. One should not have to purchase specialty hardware when = hardware already exists) Same questions go for Intel Widi also. I am just utterly perplexed that there are wireless live streaming solution and yet no wired. How on earth can wireless be the goto transmission medium? Is there another solution that takes advantage of H.264 video compression allowing live streaming over a wired connection? (*) - Perhaps this isn't the first but afaik it is the first complete package. (**) - I cant back that up with hard evidence/links but someone probably could. Edit: Maybe this will be the solution I am looking for but I still find it hard to believe that they would be the first and after wireless solutions already exist. In-home Streaming You can play all your Windows and Mac games on your SteamOS machine, too. Just turn on your existing computer and run Steam as you always have - then your SteamOS machine can stream those games over your home network straight to your TV! - http://store.steampowered.com/livingroom/SteamOS/

    Read the article

  • Internet Connectivity Issue

    - by MastaChief11
    Lately, I have been having issues connecting to the internet on one of my computers. The computer I am using now, however, is on the same network as the computer I am posting from. The issues seemed to randomly start about 2 days ago, and the only thing that seemed to fix the issue was to connect to Hotspot Shield VPN. I do not get any yellow warning signs by the Wi-Fi icon in the taskbar. I am sometimes able to use Google search, but I can never go to a website. I am also not able to re-install Hotspot Shield or update Flash because they have to connect to their company's servers. I have tried other VPN services just to see if it would fix anything, but as I expected, nothing changed. I am unsure of how I can fix the issue, and I appreciate all help given. I am running Windows 7 64 Bit Pro on a custom-built computer. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I create a WiFi hotspot sharing wireless internet connection (single adapter)?

    - by Ruppesh Nalwaya
    I know how to create a hotspot when connected to a wired network, but when I am using internet from a WiFi connection, this disconnects the wireless connection the moment I activate the hotspot. In Windows I can use Connectify Hotspot, which enables me to share the internet connection from the same wireless adapter as I am creating an access point on. As you can read on the technology overview page: Access Point mode allows you to create a hotspot using the same Wi-Fi card that you are using to access the Internet. How do I do this on Ubuntu?

    Read the article

  • Arduino Ethernet Shield Not Connecting to WebServer

    - by new user
    I have a problem making my Arduino Ethernet shield to communicate with the server, the result on the serial monitor is always: my arduino code is #include <Ethernet.h> //library for ethernet functions #include <SPI.h> #include <Dns.h> #include <Client.h> //library for client functions #include <DallasTemperature.h> //library for temperature sensors // Ethernet settings byte mac[] = {0x09,0xA2,0xDA,0x00,0x01,0x26}; //Replace with your Ethernet shield MAC byte ip[] = { 192,168,0,54}; //The Arduino device IP address byte subnet[] = { 255,255,255,0}; byte gateway[] = { 192,168,0,1}; IPAddress server(192,168,0,53); // IP-adress of server arduino sends data to EthernetClient client; bool connected = false; void setup(void) { Serial.begin(9600); Serial.println("Initializing Ethernet."); delay(1000); Ethernet.begin(mac, ip , gateway , subnet); } void loop(void) { if(!connected) { Serial.println("Not connected"); if (client.connect(server, 80)) { connected = true; int temp =analogRead(A1); Serial.print("Temp is "); Serial.println(temp); Serial.println(); Serial.println("Sending to Server: "); client.print("GET /formSubmit.php?t0="); Serial.print("GET /formSubmit.php?t0="); client.print(temp); Serial.print(temp); client.println(" HTTP/1.1"); Serial.println(" HTTP/1.1"); client.println("Host: http://localhost/PhpProject1/"); Serial.println("Host: http://localhost/PhpProject1/"); client.println("User-Agent: Arduino"); Serial.println("User-Agent: Arduino"); client.println("Accept: text/html"); Serial.println("Accept: text/html"); //client.println("Connection: close"); //Serial.println("Connection: close"); client.println(); Serial.println(); delay(10000); } else{ Serial.println("Cannot connect to Server"); } } else { delay(1000); while (client.connected() && client.available()) { char c = client.read(); Serial.print(c); } Serial.println(); client.stop(); connected = false; } } the server is an Apache server running on a pc, the server ip address in the code is the pc ip address. For testing purposes I work at my homes network, there's no proxy or firewall, and I also turned of the antivirus and firewall on my pc. the result in the serial monitor is always: Not connected Cannot connect to Server Any thoughts??

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >