Search Results

Search found 81 results on 4 pages for 'persistance'.

Page 2/4 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4  | Next Page >

  • WPF: Reloading app parts to handle persistence as well as memory management.

    - by Ingó Vals
    I created a app using Microsoft's WPF. It mostly handles data reading and input as well as associating relations between data within specific parameters. As a total beginner I made some bad design decision ( not so much decisions as using the first thing I got to work ) but now understanding WPF better I'm getting the urge to refactor my code with better design principles. I had several problems but I guess each deserves it's own question for clarity. Here I'm asking for proper ways to handle the data itself. In the original I wrapped each row in a object when fetched from database ( using LINQ to SQL ) somewhat like Active Record just not active or persistence (each app instance had it's own data handling part). The app has subunits handling different aspects. However as it was setup it loaded everything when started. This creates several problems, for example often it wouldn't be neccesary to load a part unless we were specifically going to work with that part so I wan't some form of lazy loading. Also there was problem with inner persistance because you might create a new object/row in one aspect and perhaps set relation between it and different object but the new object wouldn't appear until the program was restarted. Persistance between instances of the app won't be huge problem because of the small amount of people using the program. While I could solve this now using dirty tricks I would rather refactor the program and do it elegantly, Now the question is how. I know there are several ways and a few come to mind: 1) Each aspect of the program is it's own UserControl that get's reloaded/instanced everytime you navigate to it. This ensures you only load up the data you need and you get some persistancy. DB server located on same LAN and tables are small so that shouldn't be a big problem. Minor drawback is that you would have to remember the state of each aspect so you wouldn't always start at beginners square. 2) Having a ViewModel type object at the base level of the app with lazy loading and some kind of timeout. I would then propegate this object down the visual tree to ensure every aspect is getting it's data from the same instance 3) Semi active record data layer with static load methods. 4) Some other idea What in your opinion is the most practical way in WPF, what does MVVM assume?

    Read the article

  • Mozilla annonce deux nouvelles bêta pour Firefox 4 pouvant retarder davantage la sortie du navigateur, Hotmail mis en cause

    Mozilla annonce deux nouvelles bêta pour Firefox 4 Pouvant retarder davantage la sortie du navigateur, Hotmail mis en cause Mise à jour du 04/02/2011 par Idelways La fondation Mozilla vient d'annoncer deux bêta supplémentaires pour Firefox 4, déjà à sa dixième bêta depuis la semaine dernière. Cette extension du programme de texte du navigateur risque donc de retarder d'avantage la sortie de la Release Candidate sensée précéder la version définitive plus tard ce mois. Ce nième report s'explique d'après Christian Legnitto (release-manager de Firefox) par la persistance de certains bogues bloquants. Notamment...

    Read the article

  • Introduction par l'exemple à Entity Framework 5 Code First, un article de Serge Tahé

    Bonjour, J'ai mis en ligne "Introduction par l'exemple à Entity Framework 5 Code First". C'est un tutoriel destiné en priorité aux débutants même s'il peut intéresser d'autres publics. Citation: - Création d'une base SQL Server 2012 à partir d'entités EF5 ; - Ajout, Modification, Suppression d'entités ; - Requêtage du contexte de persistance avec LINQ to Entities ; - Gestion des entités détachées ; - Lazy et Eager loading ;

    Read the article

  • Java EE 7 offrira un support étendu du PaaS, la plateforme confirme son virage vers le Cloud

    Java EE 7 offrira un support étendu du PaaS La plateforme confirme son virage vers le Cloud Mise à jour du 24/06/11, par Hinault Romaric On sait déjà que le prochain Java EE 7 sera très orienté Cloud. La technologie Java pour les applications d'entreprises, dont les spécifications traitent des sujets comme la persistance, le développement et le déploiement d'applications, sera adaptée pour supporter plusieurs modèles de Cloud. Selon les déclarations d'un employé d'Oracle, le prochain JAVA EE aura des capacités permettant une prise en charge du PaaS ((Platform-as-a-service), défini comme la couche intermédiaire en...

    Read the article

  • Where should I start and how to progress when learning Java EE

    - by danizmax
    I know basic stuff like, what are beans, jsp, servlet, jsf and how this stuff should work together. I know how to make basic jsp page with database query for example. Now I need to know what is the best path to learn all this stuff. My plan is to learn in this order: jsp (including persistance and JSTL) servlets + beans jsf The jump to frameworks (hibernate, struts, spring, etc) Also I'm not exactly sure about JSF, is it a must to make great pages or is it just a convenience to know?

    Read the article

  • Java EE 7 : les fonctionnalités Cloud reportées, à cause d'un progrès trop lent de la spécification

    Java EE 7 offrira un support étendu du PaaS La plateforme confirme son virage vers le Cloud Mise à jour du 24/06/11, par Hinault Romaric On sait déjà que le prochain Java EE 7 sera très orienté Cloud. La technologie Java pour les applications d'entreprises, dont les spécifications traitent des sujets comme la persistance, le développement et le déploiement d'applications, sera adaptée pour supporter plusieurs modèles de Cloud. Selon les déclarations d'un employé d'Oracle, le prochain JAVA EE aura des capacités permettant une prise en charge du PaaS ((Platform-as-a-service), défini comme la couche intermédiaire en...

    Read the article

  • WF performance with new 20,000 persisted workflow instances each month

    - by Nikola Stjelja
    Windows Workflow Foundation has a problem that is slow when doing WF instances persistace. I'm planning to do a project whose bussiness layer will be based on WF exposed WCF services. The project will have 20,000 new workflow instances created each month, each instance could take up to 2 months to finish. What I was lead to belive that given WF slownes when doing peristance my given problem would be unattainable given performance reasons. I have the following questions: Is this true? Will my performance be crap with that load(given WF persitance speed limitations) How can I solve the problem? We currently have two possible solutions: 1. Each new buisiness process request(e.g. Give me a new drivers license) will be a new WF instance, and the number of persistance operations will be limited by forwarding all status request operations to saved state values in a separate database. 2. Have only a small amount of Workflow Instances up at any give time, without any persistance ofso ever(only in case of system crashes etc.), by breaking each workflow stap in to a separate worklof and that workflow handling each business process request instance in the system that is at that current step(e.g. I'm submitting my driver license reques form, which is step one... we have 100 cases of that, and my step one workflow will handle every case simultaneusly). I'm very insterested in solution for that problem. If you want to discuss that problem pleas be free to mail me at [email protected]

    Read the article

  • db4o problem with graph of objects

    - by Staszek28
    I am a new to db4o. I have a big problem with persistance of a graph of objects. I am trying to migrate from old persistance component to new, using db4o. Before I peristed all objects its graph looked like below (Take a look at Zrodlo.Metadane.abstrakt string field with focused value) [its view from eclipse debuger] with a code: ObjectContainer db=Db4o.openFile(DB_FILE); try { db.store(encja); db.commit(); } finally{ db.close(); } After that, I tried to read it with a code: ObjectContainer db=Db4o.openFile((DB_FILE)); try{ Query q = db.query(); q.constrain(EncjaDanych.class); ObjectSet<Object> objectSet = q.execute(); logger.debug("objectSet.size" + objectSet.size()); EncjaDanych encja = (EncjaDanych) objectSet.get(0); logger.debug("ENCJA" + encja.toString()); return encja; }finally{ db.close(); } and I got it (picture below) - string field "abstrakt" is null now !!! I take a look at it using ObjectManager (picture below) and abstrakt field has not-null value there!!! The same value, that on the 1st picture. Please help me :) It is my second day with db4o. Thanks in advance! I am attaching some code with structure of persisted class: public class EncjaDanych{ Map mapaIdRepo = new HashMap(); public Map mapaNazwaRepo = new HashMap(); }

    Read the article

  • Error executing IBM DB2 Stored Proceedure in EJB container

    - by n002213f
    I'm getting the error below when i try to execute a stored procedure in a Stateless bean with container managed persistance; com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlException: DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-751, SQLSTATE=38003, SQLERRMC=STORED PROCEDURE;FXTR324;FXTR324;COMMIT, DRIVER=4.7.85 The stored proc executes without errors if i manually create the connection the database, i.e. unmanaged transaction. Is there anything i need to do for it to execute in the EJB bean?

    Read the article

  • Is there a compact or express SQL Server version that I can package with my WinForms app & is free?

    - by Greg
    Hi, Is there a light weight version of SQL Server I could use that has the characteristics of: Free (assuming my winforms app is semi-commercial) Can be seemlessly packaged for deployment as part of the winforms click-once application? (i.e. ease in installation for the user). Light weight for the user (ideally something that just runs when the winforms application that uses it is running - but better than using XML sererialization for persistance). Thanks

    Read the article

  • How does one calculate CPU utilization programmatically ?

    - by Scott Davies
    Hi, I have a benchmarking program that calculates the time (in milliseconds and ticks), for a persistance to Entity Framework 4.0. Is there a way to calculate CPU load ? I am guessing that I would need to query Windows to find out my CPU frequency, how many cores, etc. Does this sound right ? If so, what part of the .NET framework relates to querying the system ? I am guessing System.Diagnostics ? Thanks, Scott

    Read the article

  • Passing Request Object into Service Layer

    - by SpringTrickery
    In a spring mvc + spring core app, we have have a view layers, a facade, a service layer, a dao layer and a stored-proc based persistance layer. The service layer is unaware of the clients that utilitize its methods. Is it fine to propagate raw http requests into the service layer? Or is it bad practice and a violation of the loose coupling principles? If it is, then what's a clean workaround?

    Read the article

  • JSF Data transfer between UI to Business Layers

    - by Ram
    Hi, We are using JSF in UI,Spring in Business Layer,Hibernate in Persistance layer.Now my question is how to pass data from my JSF1.1_01 UI to spring Business Layer.Can I directly used my Business object in my Backed Bean or through DTO should I transfer data between the layer? Can one explain me with clear explanation if possible with piece of code and that related websites?

    Read the article

  • Alternatives to persisting objects than using __destruct() in PHP

    - by Michael
    I usually use a classes destructor method __destruct() to persist objects to session or what have you. It is just very convinient, but I'm curious to if there are any other methods that are equally appealing. Do you know of such? The curiousity arose as I was to merge/utilize two frameworks that both made use of __destruct() for persistance resulting in a race-problem.

    Read the article

  • Common filesystem for servers behind a rackspace load balancer

    - by thanos panousis
    Our PHP application consists of a single web server that will receive files from clients and perform a CPU-intensive analysis on them. Right now, analysis of a single user upload can take 3sec to conclude and take 100% CPU. This makes our system capacity amount to 1/3 requests per second. My team's requirement is to increase capacity without a lot of code reengineering. A possible solution would be to set up a load balancer in front of multiple servers running the same app, connecting to a common DB. The problem is that the analysis outputs files on disk. A load balancer would increase capacity, but then files won't be available between servers so consequent client requests may fail. We are hosted on Rackspace, is there a way to configure some sort of "common" storage for all servers, without having to rewrite our file persistance code? Current code relies on simple fopens etc. What are our options?

    Read the article

  • Loading persisted workflow after workflowdefinition has changed in WF4

    - by Flores
    How to solve this problem (in WF4): I create a workflow in xaml and start several instances of it, I have a persistancestore and all workflows persist on a bookmark half way their workflow. Now I stop the application If I restart te application everything is resumed, en nicely completes. But what if I want to change the workflow definition after the running instances persist? the only way to load the running workflows (that I was able to find) is the following way: WorkflowApplication wfapp = new WorkflowApplication(new WorkflowDefinition()); wfapp.InstanceStore = new SqlWorkflowInstanceStore(connStr); wfapp.Load(wfGuid); So you need the workflow definition, if it has changed during the persistance, things go horribly wrong. What is the best way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • "Could not register destruction callback" warn message leads to memory leaks?

    - by Séb
    Hello all, I'm in the exact same situation as this old question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2077558/warn-could-not-register-destruction-callback In short: I see a warning saying that a destruction callback could not be registered for some beans. My question is: since the beans whose destruction callback cannot be registered are two persistance beans, could this be the source of a memory leak? I am experiencing a leak in my app. Although the session timeout is set (to 30 minutes), my profiler shows me more instances of the hibernate SessionImpl each time I run a thread dump. The number of instances of SessionImpl is exactly the number of times I tried to login between two thread dumps. Thanks for your help...

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Session usage

    - by Ben
    Currently I am using ViewData or TempData for object persistance in my ASP.NET MVC application. However in a few cases where I am storing objects into ViewData through my base controller class, I am hitting the database on every request (when ViewData["whatever"] == null). It would be good to persist these into something with a longer lifespan, namely session. Similarly in an order processing pipeline, I don't want things like Order to be saved to the database on creation. I would rather populate the object in memory and then when the order gets to a certain state, save it. So it would seem that session is the best place for this? Or would you recommend that in the case of order, to retrieve the order from the database on each request, rather than using session? Thoughts, suggestions appreciated. Thanks Ben

    Read the article

  • Adding ivars to NSManagedObject subclass

    - by The Crazy Chimp
    When I create an entity using core data then generate a subclass of NSManagedObject from it I get the following output (in the .h): @class Foo; @interface Foo : NSManagedObject @property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *name; @property (nonatomic, retain) NSSet *otherValues; @end However, in my .m file I want to make use of the name and otherValues values. Normally I would simply create a couple of ivars and then add the properties for them as I required. That way I can access them in my .m file easily. In this situation would it be acceptable to do this? Would adding ivars to the .h (for name and otherValues) cause any unusual behaviour in the persistance & retrieval of objects?

    Read the article

  • How to: Save order of tabs when customizing tabs in UITabBarController

    - by Canada Dev
    I am having problems finding any other information than the docs for how to save the tab order for my UITabBarController, so that the user's customization is saved for next app launch. I have searched online, but have been unable to find any blog posts or articles that goes through the proper code for doing this. I realize I have to use the delegate methods for the UITabBarController (didEndCustomizingViewControllers:) but I am not sure how I best approach persistance in terms of saving the state of the order the user wants the tabs in. Can someone post some code, point me in the right direction or perhaps you have a link for something saved? :) Thanks

    Read the article

  • netbeans + hibernate for java swing application

    - by blow
    Hi all, im developing a java swing app and i would use hibernate for persistance. Im totally new in jpa, hibernate and ORM in general. Im follow this tutorial, its easy but the problem is the java class that descrive a table in db are made from the table with reverse enginering. I want do the opposite process: i want make db table from the java class. The question is, how can i do this with netbeans? There are some tutorial?

    Read the article

  • How should my team decide between 3-tier and 2-tier architectures?

    - by j0rd4n
    My team is discussing the future direction we take our projects. Half the team believes in a pure 3-tier architecture while the other half favors a 2-tier architecture. Project Assumptions: Enterprise business applications Business logic needed between user and database Data validation necessary Service-oriented (prefer RESTful services) Multi-year maintenance plan Support hundreds of users 3-tier Team Favors: Persistant layer <== Domain layer <== UI layer Service boundary between at least persistant layer and domain layer. Domain layer might have service boundary between it. Translations between each layer (clean DTO separation) Hand roll persistance unless we can find creative yet elegant automation 2-tier Team Favors: Entity Framework + WCF Data Service layer <== UI layer Business logic kept in WCF Data Service interceptors Minimal translation between layers - favor faster coding So that's the high-level argument. What considerations should we take into account? What experiences have you had with either approach?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4  | Next Page >