Search Results

Search found 45436 results on 1818 pages for 'singleton class'.

Page 2/1818 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • How to create a fully lazy singleton for generics

    - by Brendan Vogt
    I have the following code implementation of my generic singleton provider: public sealed class Singleton<T> where T : class, new() { Singleton() { } public static T Instance { get { return SingletonCreator.instance; } } class SingletonCreator { static SingletonCreator() { } internal static readonly T instance = new T(); } } This sample was taken from 2 articles and I merged the code to get me what I wanted: http://www.yoda.arachsys.com/csharp/singleton.html and http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/11111/Generic-Singleton-Provider. This is how I tried to use the code above: public class MyClass { public static IMyInterface Initialize() { if (Singleton<IMyInterface>.Instance == null // Error 1 { Singleton<IMyInterface>.Instance = CreateEngineInstance(); // Error 2 Singleton<IMyInterface>.Instance.Initialize(); } return Singleton<IMyInterface>.Instance; } } And the interface: public interface IMyInterface { } The error at Error 1 is: 'MyProject.IMyInterace' must be a non-abstract type with a public parameterless constructor in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method 'MyProject.Singleton<T>' The error at Error 2 is: Property or indexer 'MyProject.Singleton<MyProject.IMyInterface>.Instance' cannot be assigned to -- it is read only How can I fix this so that it is in line with the 2 articles mentioned above? Any other ideas or suggestions are appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Class design, One class in two sources

    - by Pavla
    Is it possible define methods from the same class in different "CPP" files? I have header file "myClass.h" with: class myClass { public: // methods for counting ... // methods for other ... }; I would like to define "methods for counting" in one CPP and "methods for other" in other CPP. For clarity. Both groups of methods sometime use the same attributes. Is it possible? Thanks :).

    Read the article

  • Singleton by Jon Skeet clarification

    - by amutha
    public sealed class Singleton { Singleton() { } public static Singleton Instance { get { return Nested.instance; } } class Nested { // Explicit static constructor to tell C# compiler // not to mark type as beforefieldinit static Nested() { } internal static readonly Singleton instance = new Singleton(); } } I wish to implement Jon Skeet's Singleton pattern in my current application in C#. I have two doubts on the code 1) How is it possible to access the outer class inside nested class? I mean internal static readonly Singleton instance = new Singleton(); Is something called closure? 2) I did not get this comment // Explicit static constructor to tell C# compiler // not to mark type as beforefieldinit what does this comment suggest us?

    Read the article

  • Extending a singleton class

    - by cakyus
    i used to create an instance of a singleton class like this: $Singleton = SingletonClassName::GetInstance(); and for non singleton class: $NonSingleton = new NonSingletonClassName; i think we should not differentiate how we create an instance of a class whether this is a singleton or not. if i look in perception of other class, i don't care whether the class we need a singleton class or not. so, i still not comfortable with how php treat a singleton class. i think and i always want to write: $Singleton = new SingletonClassName; just another non singleton class, is there a solution to this problem ?

    Read the article

  • Using singleton instead of a global static instance

    - by Farstucker
    I ran into a problem today and a friend recommended I use a global static instance or more elegantly a singleton pattern. I spent a few hours reading about singletons but a few things still escape me. Background: What Im trying to accomplish is creating an instance of an API and use this one instance in all my classes (as opposed to making a new connection, etc). There seems to be about 100 ways of creating a singleton but with some help from yoda I found some thread safe examples. ..so given the following code: public sealed class Singleton { public static Singleton Instance { get; private set; } private Singleton() { APIClass api = new APIClass(); //Can this be done? } static Singleton() { Instance = new Singleton(); } } How/Where would you instantiate the this new class and how should it be called from a separate class? EDIT: I realize the Singleton class can be called with something like Singleton obj1 = Singleton.Instance(); but would I be able to access the methods within the APIs Class (ie. obj1.Start)? (not that I need to, just asking) EDIT #2: I might have been a bit premature in checking the answer but I do have one small thing that is still causing me problems. The API is launching just fine, unfortunately Im able to launch two instances? New Code public sealed class SingletonAPI { public static SingletonAPI Instance { get; private set; } private SingletonAPI() {} static SingletonAPI() { Instance = new SingletonAPI(); } // API method: public void Start() { API myAPI = new API();} } but if I try to do something like this... SingletonAPI api = SingletonAPI.Instance; api.Start(); SingletonAPI api2 = SingletonAPI.Instance; // This was just for testing. api2.Start(); I get an error saying that I cannot start more than one instance.

    Read the article

  • Singleton class in DLL used on multiple virtual directories

    - by Drejc
    I have the following situation: multiple virtual directories under same application pool in IIS copy of same DLL in all those directories (same version number) a singleton class in one in this DLL The question is, is this singleton class created only once for all those Virtual Directory instances or is there for each of there one singleton class. The code looks something like this: [ Transaction(TransactionOption.Supported), ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.AutoDispatch), Guid("7DE45C4D-19BE-4AA4-A2DA-F4D86E6502A8") ] public class SomeClass { private static readonly Singleton singleton = new Singleton();

    Read the article

  • DIV is picking max-width value as width value for DIV.

    - by Lokesh
    I am facing a problem after applying max-width hack for IE7. In mozilla, width of the div is flexible and adjustable as per the image width in the div. But in IE7 it is taking the max-width as width of DIV. Below is my HTML code: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all" href="style/food.css" /> <!--[if IE 7]> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" href="style/ie7.css" /> <![endif]--> </head> <body> <div class="main_content_inner_ko"> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/><div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/chicken/PremCrispyChickenRanchBLT.png" height="115" width="115" alt="Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT"/><div class="small_title">Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/chicken/PremCrispyChickenRanchBLT.png" height="115" width="115" alt="Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT"/> <div class="small_title">Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/chicken/PremCrispyChickenRanchBLT.png" height="115" width="115" alt="Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT"/> <div class="small_title">Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="clear"></div> </div> </body> Below is the css code: div.small_title { font-size: 10px; color: #929292; text-align: center; max-width: 115px; line-height: 13px; padding-top: 5px; margin: 0 auto; } .product_item { position: relative; float:left; min-width: 35px; max-width: 189px; width: auto !important; text-align:center; border: 1px solid #CCC; } Please help me! Cheers!! Lokesh Yadav

    Read the article

  • In Ruby are there any related applications of the syntax: class << self ... end

    - by pez_dispenser
    class << self attr_accessor :n, :totalX, :totalY end The syntax above is used for defining class instance variables. But when I think about what syntax implies, it doesn't make any sense to me, so I'm wondering if this type of syntax is used for any other types of definitions. My point of confusion here is this: class << self The append operator normally means "add what's on the right to the object on the left". But in the context of this block, how does that add up to "put the contents of this block into the definition of the class instance rather than the instance"? For the same reason I'm confused as to why in one context class << self can define class instance variables while in another it seems to create class variables such as here: class Point # Instance methods go here class << self # Class methods go here end end

    Read the article

  • what is the exact difference between PHP static class and singleton class

    - by Saif Bechan
    I have always used a Singleton class for a registry object in PHP. As all Singleton classes I think the main method looks like this: class registry { public static function singleton() { if( !isset( self::$instance ) ) { self::$instance = new registry(); } return self::$instance; } public function doSomething() { echo 'something'; } } So whenever I need something of the registry class I use a function like this: registry::singleton()->doSomethine(); Now I do not understand what the difference is between creating just a normal static function. Will it create a new object if I just use a normal static class. class registry { public static function doSomething() { echo 'something'; } } Now I can just use: registry::doSomethine(); Can someone explain to me what the function is of the singleton class. I really do not understand this.

    Read the article

  • UML class diagram - can aggregated object be part of two aggregated classes?

    - by user970696
    Some sources say that aggregation means that the class owns the object and shares reference. Lets assume an example where a company class holds a list of cars but departments of that company has list of cars used by them. class Department { list<Car> listOfCars; } class Company { list<Car> listOfCars; //initialization of the list } So in UML class diagram, I would do it like this. But I assume this is not allowed because it would imply that both company and department own the objects.. [COMPANY]<>------[CAR] [DEPARTMENT]<>---| //imagine this goes up to the car class

    Read the article

  • Base class -> Derived class and vice-versa conversions in C++

    - by Ivan Nikolaev
    Hi! I have the following example code: #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std; class Event { public: string type; string source; }; class KeyEvent : public Event { public: string key; string modifier; }; class MouseEvent : public Event { public: string button; int x; int y; }; void handleEvent(KeyEvent e) { if(e.key == "ENTER") cout << "Hello world! The Enter key was pressed ;)" << endl; } Event generateEvent() { KeyEvent e; e.type = "KEYBOARD_EVENT"; e.source = "Keyboard0"; e.key = "SPACEBAR"; e.modifier = "none"; return e; } int main() { KeyEvent e = generateEvent(); return 0; } I can't compile it, G++ throws an error of kind: main.cpp: In function 'int main()': main.cpp:47:29: error: conversion from 'Event' to non-scalar type 'KeyEvent' requested I know that the error is obvious for C++ guru's, but I can't understand why I can't do the conversion from base class object to derived one. Can someone suggest me the solution of the problem that I have? Thx in advice

    Read the article

  • 'abstract class' versus 'normal class' for a reusable library

    - by Greg
    I'm developing a reusable library and have been creating abstract classes, so the client can then extend from these. QUESTION: Is there any reason in fact I should use an abstract class here as opposed to just a normal class? Note - Have already decided I do not want to use interfaces as I want to include actual default methods in my library so the client using it doesn't have to write the code.

    Read the article

  • Singleton with inheritance, Derived class is not able to get instantiated in parent?

    - by yesraaj
    Below code instantiates a derived singleton object based on environment variable. The compiler errors saying error C2512: 'Dotted' : no appropriate default constructor. I don't understand what the compiler is complaining about. #include <stdlib.h> #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std; class Dotted; class Singleton{ public: static Singleton instant(){ if (!instance_) { char * style = getenv("STYLE"); if (!style){ if (strcmp(style,"dotted")==0) { instance_ = new Dotted(); return *instance_; } } else{ instance_ = new Singleton(); return *instance_; } } return *instance_; } void print(){cout<<"Singleton";} ~Singleton(){}; protected: Singleton(){}; private: static Singleton * instance_; Singleton(const Singleton & ); void operator=(const Singleton & ); }; class Dotted:public Singleton{ public: void print(){cout<<"Dotted";} protected: Dotted(); }; Dotted::Dotted():Singleton(){} int main(){ Singleton::instant().print(); cin.get(); }

    Read the article

  • Thread safety in Singleton

    - by Robert
    I understand that double locking in Java is broken, so what are the best ways to make Singletons Thread Safe in Java? The first thing that springs to my mind is: class Singleton{ private static Singleton instance; private Singleton(){} public static synchronized Singleton getInstance(){ if(instance == null) instance = new Singleton(); return instance; } } Does this work? if so, is it the best way (I guess that depends on circumstances, so stating when a particular technique is best, would be useful)

    Read the article

  • BizTalk host throttling &ndash; Singleton pattern and High database size

    - by S.E.R.
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/SERivas/archive/2013/06/30/biztalk-host-throttling-ndash-singleton-pattern-and-high-database-size.aspxI have worked for some days around the singleton pattern (for those unfamiliar with it, read this post by Victor Fehlberg) and have come across a few very interesting posts, among which one dealt with performance issues (here, also by Victor Fehlberg). Simply put: if you have an orchestration which implements the singleton pattern, then performances will continuously decrease as the orchestration receives and consumes messages, and that behavior is more obvious when the orchestration never ends (ie : it keeps looping and never terminates or completes). As I experienced the same kind of problem (actually I was alerted by SCOM, which told me that the host was being throttled because of High database size), I thought it would be a good idea to dig a little bit a see what happens deep inside BizTalk and thus understand the reasons for this behavior. NOTE: in this article, I will focus on this High database size throttling condition. I will try and work on the other conditions in some not too distant future… Test conditions The singleton orchestration For the purpose of this study, I have created the following orchestration, which is a very basic implementation of a singleton that piles up incoming messages, then does something else when a certain timeout has been reached without receiving another message: Throttling settings I have two distinct hosts : one that hosts the receive port (basic FILE port) : Ports_ReceiveHostone that hosts the orchestration : ProcessingHost In order to emphasize the throttling mechanism, I have modified the throttling settings for each of these hosts are as follows (all other parameters are set to the default value): [Throttling thresholds] Message count in database: 500 (default value : 50000) Evolution of performance counters when submitting messages Since we are investigating the High database size throttling condition, here are the performance counter that we should take a look at (all of them are in the BizTalk:Message Agent performance object): Database sizeHigh database sizeMessage delivery throttling stateMessage publishing throttling stateMessage delivery delay (ms)Message publishing delay (ms)Message delivery throttling state durationMessage publishing throttling state duration (If you are not used to Perfmon, I strongly recommend that you start using it right now: it is a wonderful tool that allows you to open the hood and see what is going on inside BizTalk – and other systems) Database size It is quite obvious that we will start by watching the database size and high database size counters, just to see when the first reaches the configured threshold (500) and when the second rings the alarm. NOTE : During this test I submitted 600 messages, one message at a time every 10ms to see the evolution of the counters we have previously selected. It might not show very well on this screenshot, but here is what happened: From 15:46:50 to 15:47:50, the database size for the Ports_ReceiveHost host (blue line) kept growing until it reached a maximum of 504.At 15:47:50, the high database size alert fires At first I was surprised by this result: why is it the database size of the receiving host that keeps growing since it is the processing host that piles up messages? Actually, it makes total sense. This counter measures the size of the database queue that is being filled by the host, not consumed. Therefore, the high database size alert is raised on the host that fills the queue: Ports_ReceiveHost. More information is available on the Public MPWiki page. Now, looking at the Message publishing throttling state for the receiving host (green line), we can see that a throttling condition has been reached at 15:47:50: We can also see that the Message publishing delay(ms) (blue line) has begun growing slowly from this point. All of this explains why performances keep decreasing when a singleton keeps processing new messages: the database size grows and when it has exceeded the Message count in database threshold, the host is throttled and the publishing delay keeps increasing. Digging further So, what happens to the database queue then? Is it flushed some day or does it keep growing and growing indefinitely? The real question being: will the host be throttled forever because of this singleton? To answer this question, I set the Message count in database threshold to 20 (this value is very low in order not to wait for too long, otherwise I certainly would have fallen asleep in front of my screen) and I submitted 30 messages. The test was started at 18:26. At 18:56 (ie : exactly 30min later) the throttling was stopped and the database size was divided by 2. 30 min later again, the database size had dropped to almost zero: I guess I’ll have to find some documentation and do some more testing before I sort this out! My guess is that some maintenance job is at work here, though I cannot tell which one Digging even further If we take a look at the Message delivery throttling state counter for the processing host, we can see that this host was also throttled during the submission of the 600 documents: The value for the counter was 1, meaning that Message delivery incoming rate for the host instance exceeds the Message delivery outgoing rate * the specified Rate overdrive factor (percent) value. We will see this another day… :) A last word Let’s end this article with a warning: DO NOT CHANGE THE THROTTLING SETTINGS LIGHTLY! The temptation can be great to just bypass throttling by setting very high values for each parameter (or zero in some cases, which simply disables throttling). Nevertheless, always keep in mind that this mechanism is here for a very good reason: prevent your BizTalk infrastructure from exploding!! So whatever you do with those settings, do a lot of testing and benchmarking!

    Read the article

  • Singleton: How should it be used

    - by Loki Astari
    Edit: From another question I provided an answer that has links to a lot of questions/answers about singeltons: More info about singletons here: So I have read the thread Singletons: good design or a crutch? And the argument still rages. I see Singletons as a Design Pattern (good and bad). The problem with Singleton is not the Pattern but rather the users (sorry everybody). Everybody and their father thinks they can implement one correctly (and from the many interviews I have done, most people can't). Also because everybody thinks they can implement a correct Singleton they abuse the Pattern and use it in situations that are not appropriate (replacing global variables with Singletons!). So the main questions that need to be answered are: When should you use a Singleton How do you implement a Singleton correctly My hope for this article is that we can collect together in a single place (rather than having to google and search multiple sites) an authoritative source of when (and then how) to use a Singleton correctly. Also appropriate would be a list of Anti-Usages and common bad implementations explaining why they fail to work and for good implementations their weaknesses. So get the ball rolling: I will hold my hand up and say this is what I use but probably has problems. I like "Scott Myers" handling of the subject in his books "Effective C++" Good Situations to use Singletons (not many): Logging frameworks Thread recycling pools /* * C++ Singleton * Limitation: Single Threaded Design * See: http://www.aristeia.com/Papers/DDJ_Jul_Aug_2004_revised.pdf * For problems associated with locking in multi threaded applications * * Limitation: * If you use this Singleton (A) within a destructor of another Singleton (B) * This Singleton (A) must be fully constructed before the constructor of (B) * is called. */ class MySingleton { private: // Private Constructor MySingleton(); // Stop the compiler generating methods of copy the object MySingleton(MySingleton const& copy); // Not Implemented MySingleton& operator=(MySingleton const& copy); // Not Implemented public: static MySingleton& getInstance() { // The only instance // Guaranteed to be lazy initialized // Guaranteed that it will be destroyed correctly static MySingleton instance; return instance; } }; OK. Lets get some criticism and other implementations together. :-)

    Read the article

  • C# Using singleton instead of a global static instance

    - by Farstucker
    I ran into a problem today and a friend recommended I use a global static instance or more elegantly a singleton pattern. I spent a few hours reading about singletons but a few things still escape me. Background: What Im trying to accomplish is creating an instance of an API and use this one instance in all my classes (as opposed to making a new connection, etc). There seems to be about 100 ways of creating a singleton but with some help from yoda I found some thread safe examples. ..so given the following code: public sealed class Singleton { public static Singleton Instance { get; private set; } static Singleton() { Instance = new Singleton(); } } How/Where would you instantiate the this new class and how should it be called from a separate class? Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • C++ Singleton design pattern

    - by Artem Barger
    Recently I've bumped into a realization/implementation of the Singleton design pattern for C++. It has looked like this (I have adopted it from the real life example): // a lot of methods are omitted here class Singleton { public: static Singleton* getInstance( ); ~Singleton( ); private: Singleton( ); static Singleton* instance; }; From this declaration I can deduce that the instance field is initiated on the heap. That means there is a memory allocation. What is completely unclear for me is when exactly the memory is going to be deallocated? Or is there a bug and memory leak? It seems like there is a problem in the implementation. My main question is, how do I implement it in the right way?

    Read the article

  • Advantages of Singleton Class over Static Class?

    Point 1)Singleton We can get the object of singleton and then pass to other methods.Static Class We can not pass static class to other methods as we pass objectsPoint 2) Singleton In future, it is easy to change the logic of of creating objects to some pooling mechanism. Static Class Very difficult to implement some pooling logic in case of static class. We would need to make that class as non-static and then make all the methods non-static methods, So entire your code needs to be changed.Point3:) Singleton Can Singletone class be inherited to subclass? Singleton class does not say any restriction of Inheritence. So we should be able to do this as long as subclass is also inheritence.There's nothing fundamentally wrong with subclassing a class that is intended to be a singleton. There are many reasons you might want to do it. and there are many ways to accomplish it. It depends on language you use.Static Class We can not inherit Static class to another Static class in C#. Think about it this way: you access static members via type name, like this: MyStaticType.MyStaticMember(); Were you to inherit from that class, you would have to access it via the new type name: MyNewType.MyStaticMember(); Thus, the new item bears no relationships to the original when used in code. There would be no way to take advantage of any inheritance relationship for things like polymorphism. span.fullpost {display:none;}

    Read the article

  • Advantages of Singleton Class over Static Class?

    Point 1) Singleton We can get the object of singleton and then pass to other methods. Static Class We can not pass static class to other methods as we pass objects Point 2) Singleton In future, it is easy to change the logic of of creating objects to some pooling mechanism. Static Class Very difficult to implement some pooling logic in case of static class. We would need to make that class as non-static and then make all the methods non-static methods, So entire your code needs to be changed. Point3:) Singleton Can Singletone class be inherited to subclass? Singleton class does not say any restriction of Inheritence. So we should be able to do this as long as subclass is also inheritence.There's nothing fundamentally wrong with subclassing a class that is intended to be a singleton. There are many reasons you might want to do it. and there are many ways to accomplish it. It depends on language you use. Static Class We can not inherit Static class to another Static class in C#. Think about it this way: you access static members via type name, like this: MyStaticType.MyStaticMember(); Were you to inherit from that class, you would have to access it via the new type name: MyNewType.MyStaticMember(); Thus, the new item bears no relationships to the original when used in code. There would be no way to take advantage of any inheritance relationship for things like polymorphism. span.fullpost {display:none;}

    Read the article

  • Singleton Roles in Moose

    - by mjn12
    I am attempting to write a singleton role using Perl and Moose. I understand a MooseX::Singleton module is available but there is always resistance when requiring another CPAN module for our project. After trying this and having a little trouble I would like to understand WHY my method is not working. The singleton role I have written is as follows: package Singleton; use Moose::Role; my $_singleInstance; around 'new' => sub { my $orig = shift; my $class = shift; if (not defined $_singleInstance ){ $_singleInstance = $class->$orig(@_); } return $_singleInstance; }; sub getInstance { return __PACKAGE__->new(); } 1; This appears to work find when only one class uses the singleton role. However when two classes (ClassA and ClassB for example) both consume the Singleton role it appears as they are both referring to a shared $_singleInstance variable. If I call ClassA-getInstance it returns a reference to a ClassA object. If I call ClassB-getInstance sometime later in the same script it returns a reference to an object of type ClassA (even though I clearly called the getInstance method for ClassB). If I dont use a role and actually copy and paste the code from the Singleton role into ClassA and ClassB it appears to work fine. Whats going on here?

    Read the article

  • Using Dispose on a Singleton to Cleanup Resources

    - by ImperialLion
    The question I have might be more to do with semantics than with the actual use of IDisposable. I am working on implementing a singleton class that is in charge of managing a database instance that is created during the execution of the application. When the application closes this database should be deleted. Right now I have this delete being handled by a Cleanup() method of the singleton that the application calls when it is closing. As I was writing the documentation for Cleanup() it struck me that I was describing what a Dispose() method should be used for i.e. cleaning up resources. I had originally not implemented IDisposable because it seemed out of place in my singleton, because I didn't want anything to dispose the singleton itself. There isn't currently, but in the future might be a reason that this Cleanup() might be called but the singleton should will need to still exist. I think I can include GC.SuppressFinalize(this); in the Dispose method to make this feasible. My question therefore is multi-parted: 1) Is implementing IDisposable on a singleton fundamentally a bad idea? 2) Am I just mixing semantics here by having a Cleanup() instead of a Dispose() and since I'm disposing resources I really should use a dispose? 3) Will implementing 'Dispose()' with GC.SuppressFinalize(this); make it so my singleton is not actually destroyed in the case I want it to live after a call to clean-up the database.

    Read the article

  • Can I use an abstract class instead of a private __construct() when creating a singleton in PHP?

    - by Pheter
    When creating a Singleton in PHP, I ensure that it cannot be instantiated by doing the following: class Singleton { private function __construct() {} private function __clone() {} public static function getInstance() {} } However, I realised that defining a class as 'abstract' means that it cannot be instantiated. So is there anything wrong with doing the following instead: abstract class Singleton { public static function getInstance() {} } The second scenario allows me to write fewer lines of code which would be nice. (Not that it actually makes much of a difference.)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >