Search Results

Search found 2880 results on 116 pages for 'deep linking'.

Page 20/116 | < Previous Page | 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27  | Next Page >

  • Getting error when compiling debug mode: C++/CLI - error LNK2022

    - by Yochai Timmer
    I've got a CLI code wrapping a C++ DLL. When i try to compile it in debug mode, i get the following error: Error 22 error LNK2022: metadata operation failed (8013118D) : Inconsistent layout information induplicated types .... MSVCMRTD.lib (locale0_implib.obj) The weird thing is that on Release mode it compiles OK and works OK. The only difference i can see that causes the problem is when i change: Configuration Properties - C/C++ - Code Generation - Runtime Library When it's set to: Multi-threaded Debug DLL (/MDd) it throws the error. When it's set to: Multi-threaded DLL (/MD) it compiles fine. The same settings work for all the other DLLs in the project (CLI and C++) and they inherit the same properties. I'm using VS2010. So, how can i solve this ? And can I get some explanation to WHY this is happening ? Update: I've basically tried changing every option in the project's properties with no luck. I've read somewhere that this might be caused from duplicate declarations of a type of the same name. But in the CLI file i'm calling std::string etc. explicitly from std. Any other ideas ?

    Read the article

  • Including the functionality of a tool within another program?

    - by darren
    Hi there I would like to write an application, for my own interest, that graphically visualizes some network concepts. Basically I would like to show the output from tools like ping, traceroute and nmap. The most obvious approach seems to be to use pipes to call out to these tools from my C program, and process the information they return. However, I would like to avoid this heavy-handed approach if possible. My question is, is it possible to somehow link against these tools, or are there APIs that can be used to gain programatic access instead? If so, is this behavior available on a tool-by-tool basis only? One reason for wanting to do this is to keep everything in a single process / address space and to avoid dependance on these external tools. For example, if I wrote an iphone application, I would not be able to spawn processes to call out to the external tools themselves. Thanks for any advice or suggestions.

    Read the article

  • crt0 and crt1 -- What's the difference?

    - by Earlz
    Hello, recently I've been trying to debug some low level work and I could not find the crt0.S for the compiler(avr-gcc) but I did find a crt1.S What is the difference between these two files? Is crt1 something completely different or what?

    Read the article

  • How to compile a C project with more than one main function?

    - by Daziplqa
    Hi folks, I am new to C, and now read some textbook and going to apply its examples. The problem is, whenever I creates a new project and try to put more than one file that contains a main function, the linker (as I thougt0 explains saying: /home/mohammed/tmp/abcd/main.c:4: multiple definition of `main' (BTW, I used many IDEs, MonoDevelop, QT creator, VS2010, Codebloks, ...) I am currently uses QT Creator, It seems to be a very nice IDE. So, there's not a workaround to solve such problem??

    Read the article

  • Making Visual C++ DLL from C++ class

    - by prosseek
    I have the following C++ code to make dll (Visual Studio 2010). class Shape { public: Shape() { nshapes++; } virtual ~Shape() { nshapes--; }; double x, y; void move(double dx, double dy); virtual double area(void) = 0; virtual double perimeter(void) = 0; static int nshapes; }; class __declspec(dllexport) Circle : public Shape { private: double radius; public: Circle(double r) : radius(r) { }; virtual double area(void); virtual double perimeter(void); }; class __declspec(dllexport) Square : public Shape { private: double width; public: Square(double w) : width(w) { }; virtual double area(void); virtual double perimeter(void); }; I have the __declspec, class __declspec(dllexport) Circle I could build a dll with the following command CL.exe /c example.cxx link.exe /OUT:"example.dll" /DLL example.obj When I tried to use the library, Square* square; square->area() I got the error messages. What's wrong or missing? example_unittest.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual double __thiscall ... Square::area(void)" (?area@Square@@UAENXZ) ADDED Following wengseng's answer, I modified the header file, and for DLL C++ code, I added #define XYZLIBRARY_EXPORT However, I still got errors. example_unittest.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: __th iscall Circle::Circle(double)" (__imp_??0Circle@@QAE@N@Z) referenced in function "protected: virtual void __thiscall TestOne::SetUp(void)" (?SetUp@TestOne@@MAEXXZ) example_unittest.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: __th iscall Square::Square(double)" (__imp_??0Square@@QAE@N@Z) referenced in function "protected: virtual void __thiscall TestOne::SetUp(void)" (?SetUp@TestOne@@MAEXXZ) example_unittest.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual double __thiscall Square::area(void)" (?area@Square@@UAENXZ) example_unittest.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual double __thiscall Square::perimeter(void)" (?perimeter@Square@@UAENXZ) example_unittest.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual double __thiscall Circle::area(void)" (?area@Circle@@UAENXZ) example_unittest.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual double __thiscall Circle::perimeter(void)" (?perimeter@Circle@@UAENXZ)

    Read the article

  • Clone List Elements in Java

    - by Amir Rachum
    Hi all, I have a variable of type List<RelationHeader>. Now I want to copy all the elements in this list to a new list, but I want to actually copy all the members by value (clone them). Is there a quick command to do this, or do I need to iterate over the list and copy them one at a time?

    Read the article

  • Different ways to specify libraries to gcc/g++

    - by abigagli
    I'd be curious to understand if there's any substantial difference in specifying libraries (both shared and static) to gcc/g++ in the two following ways (CC can be g++ or gcc) CC -o output_executable /path/to/my/libstatic.a /path/to/my/libshared.so source1.cpp source2.cpp ... sourceN.cpp vs CC -o output_executable -L/path/to/my/libs -lstatic -lshared source1.cpp source2.cpp ... sourceN.cpp I can only see a major difference being that passing directly the fully-specified library name would make for a greater control in choosing static or dynamic versions, but I suspect there's something else going on that can have side effects on how the executable is built or will behave at runtime, am I right? Andrea.

    Read the article

  • OpenCL C/C++ dynamic binding library (win32 and more)

    - by rotoglup
    I'm giving a try at OpenCL, and in order to put this in production I'd like to be able to bind dynamically to OpenCL.DLL (when under Windows), in order to handle 'gracefully' the case where no OpenCL is installed on the host computer. Is there any available library (or code snippet) that takes care of this dynamic binding in C or C++, much like GLEW does for OpenGL ? I'd like to avoid the hassle to do it myself. Thanks,

    Read the article

  • How can I compile an autotools project with statically linked dependancies?

    - by flyx
    There's an open source library I want to use. As I want to spread my software as binary package, I do not want the library to have dependancies on other libraries, so I need to link the dependancies statically. Now as the library is open source and there are no binaries provided, I compile it myself. The library uses autotools, and I didn't find any useful documentation on how to link dependancies statically. What I did try is to call the configure script with --enable-static, but this apparently only tells configure to compile a static version of the library - but what I need is a dynamic library that includes all the libraries it depends on. So, I need a way to either tell configure to link against dependancies statically, or a way to post-process the built library to include all dependancies. Can anyone tell me how to do this? Oh, and if it matters: I'm on 64bit Snow Leopard.

    Read the article

  • How do I include 3rd party libraries in my code...

    - by Krakkos
    I understand the process of using a 3rd party library to access functions outside of my code base, but how do i actually set up Visual Studio 2005 to include them in the project. I have a 3rd party library with some headers, some cpp's, and some .lib files. In the projects properties I add the top level external library directory as an include directory, I add the additional library directory at the same level put this is project properties too. In the .cpp file where I use the functions, do I put the #include in its header file? In the top level projects header file? in the cpp? I've tried all that, but I get "unresolved external symbol"... grrrrrrrrrrrrr

    Read the article

  • Versioning code in two separate projects concurently with subverison

    - by Matt1776
    I have a need to create a library of Object Oriented PHP code that will see much reuse and aspires to be highly flexible and modular. Because of its independent nature I would like it to exist as its own SVN project. I would like to be able to create a new web project, save it in SVN as its own separate project, and include within it the library project code as well. During this process, while coding the web application code and making commits, I may need to add a class to the library. I would like to be able to do so and commit those changes back to the libraries project code. In light of all this I could manage the code in two ways Commit the changes to the library back to a branch of its original base project code and make the branch name relevant to the web project I was using it with Commit the changes to the library back to the original code, growing it in size regardless of any specific references that might exist. I have two questions How can I include this library project code into a new project yet not break the subversion functionality, i.e. allowing me to make changes to each project individually? How I can keep the code synchronized? If I choose the first method of managing the library code I may want to grab changes from another branch and pull it in for use in another.

    Read the article

  • Make LLVM inline a function from a library

    - by capitrane
    I am trying to make LLVM inline a function from a library. I have LLVM bitcode files (manually generated) that I linked together with llvm-link, I also have a library (written in C) compiled into bitcode by clang and archived with llvm-ar. I manage to link everything together and to execute but i can't manage to get LLVM to inline a function from the library. Any clue about how this should be done?

    Read the article

  • Makefile can not find boost libraries installed by macports

    - by user327502
    I just installed boost 1.42.0 from macports using sudo port install boost. Everything worked fine. Now I have a project that I'm trying to build using a makefile. Everything builds fine until it comes to the file that needs the boost library. It says: src/graph.h:20:42: error: boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp: No such file or directory That file is actually located in two places: /opt/local/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp and /opt/local/var/macports/software/boost/1.42.0_0/opt/local/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp In the file src/graph.h where it's looking for boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp, the include statement is here: #include<boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp> How do I make this work?

    Read the article

  • How can I set where a Qt app finds a Qt module?

    - by yan bellavance
    I would like to include libQtGui.so.4 libQtNetwork.so.4 and libQtCore.so.4 in the same directory as where my app resides. How would I make Qt understand this? y purpose is to have a standalone app that uses shared libraries update: im gonna try to first remove them with QT-=gui etc and seeif I can add mine back after

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio Solution: static or shared projects?

    - by goodrone
    When a whole project (solution) consists of multiple subprojects (.vcproj), what is a preferable way to tie them: as static libraries or as shared libraries? Assuming that those subprojects are not used elsewhere, the shared libraries approach shouldn't decrease memory usage or load time.

    Read the article

  • How to link Delphi with C++?

    - by CyberShadow
    cpp.cpp extern "C" char* GetText() { return "Hello, world!"; } delphi.dpr {$APPTYPE CONSOLE} {$LINK 'cpp.obj'} function _GetText: PChar; cdecl; external; begin WriteLn(_GetText); end. I can't get this to work, no matter what I try. I tried various calling conventions, playing with underscores. even creating a .c wrapper for the .cpp code (but then the .c wrapper doesn't "see" any .cpp symbols). I'm about to give up and use DLLs. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Boost Test dynamically or statically linked?

    - by Halt
    We use Boost statically linked with our app but now I wan't to use Boost Test with an external test runner and that requires the tests themselves to link dynamically with Boost.Test through the use of the required BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK define. Is this going to be a problem or is the way Boost Test links completely unrelated to the way the other Boost libraries are linked? Thx.

    Read the article

  • Make DLL dependent to other DLLs (Visual Studio IDE)

    - by Artefacto
    I'm having an inconsistency when compiling a DLL (let's call it x.dll) by calling cl.exe obj1.obj obj2.obj ... lib1.lib lib2.lib ... /link /out:x.dll /dll /debug and When using the IDE (which calls link directly, I believe). Let's say lib1.lib is an import library for lib1.dll. Opening the DLL generated by calling cl.exe in the depency walker shows it depends on lib1.dll. However, when using the IDE, the generated program is smaller and does not depend on lib1.dll. This IDE-generated image makes the program that uses x.dll crash sometimes. The question is: how do I get the correct behaviour from the IDE?

    Read the article

  • Can I update window.location.hash without having the web page scroll?

    - by Jonathon Watney
    Using JavaScript, is there a way to update window.location.hash without scrolling the web page? I have clickable title elements that toggle the visibility of a div directly beneath them. I want the /foo#bar in the history when clicking titles but don't want the page scrolling about. So when navigating away from /foo#bar I'll be able to use the back button and have the div whose ID is in window.location.hash be visible upon return. Is this behavior possible?

    Read the article

  • Adding links to this PHP statement

    - by poindexter
    Here is a PHP statement that basically sets off a javascript image slider. Only problem is I can't figure out how to get each individual image to a link to a different page. Any tips or suggestions? I appreciate it! <?php jsbrotate('height=316&width=924&imgdisp=4&imgfade=2&images=/wp-content/uploads/image_1_linked.png|/wp-content/uploads/image_2.png|/wp-content/uploads/image_3.png|/wp-content/uploads/image_4.png|/wp-content/uploads/image_5.png'); ?>

    Read the article

  • How to Embed/Link binary data into a C++ DLL

    - by CrimsonX
    So I have a Visual Studio 2008 project which has a large amount of binary data that it is currently referencing. I would like to package the binary data much like you can do with C# by adding it as a "resource" and compiling it as a DLL. Lets say all my data has an extension of ".data" and is currently being read from the visual studio project. Is there a way that you can compile or link the data into the .dll which it is calling? I've looked at some of the google link for this and so far I haven't come up with anything - the only possible solution I've come up with is to use something like ResGen to create a .resources file and then link it using AssemblyLinker with /Embed or /Link flags. I dont think it'd work properly though because I dont have text files to create the .resources files, but rather binary files themselves. Any advice?

    Read the article

  • VS2008 Link Error Using SafeInt3.hpp in 64bit mode.

    - by photo_tom
    I have the below code that links and runs fine in 32bit mode - #include "safeint3.hpp" typedef SafeInt<SIZE_T> SAFE_SIZE_T; SAFE_SIZE_T sizeOfCache; SAFE_SIZE_T _allocateAmt; Where safeint3.hpp is current version that can be found on Codeplex SafeInt. For those who are unaware of it, safeint is a template class that makes working with different integer types and sizes "safe". To quote channel 9 video on software - "it writes the code that you should". Which is my case. I have a class that is managing a large in-memory cache of objects (6gb) and I am very concerned about making sure that I don't have overflow/underflow issues on my pointers/sizes/other integer variables. In this use, it solves many problems. My problem is coming when moving from 32bit dev mode to 64bit production mode. When I build the app in this mode, I'm getting the following linker warnings - 1>cachecontrol.obj : warning LNK4006: "bool __cdecl IntrinsicMultiplyUint64(unsigned __int64 const &,unsigned __int64 const &,unsigned __int64 *)" (?IntrinsicMultiplyUint64@@YA_NAEB_K0PEA_K@Z) already defined in ImageInRamCache.obj; second definition ignored 1>cachecontrol.obj : warning LNK4006: "bool __cdecl IntrinsicMultiplyInt64(__int64 const &,__int64 const &,__int64 *)" (?IntrinsicMultiplyInt64@@YA_NAEB_J0PEA_J@Z) already defined in ImageInRamCache.obj; second definition ignored While I understand I can ignore the error, I would like either (a) prevent the warning from occurring or (b) make it disappear so that my QA department doesn't flag it as a problem. And after spending some time researching it, I cannot find a way to do either.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27  | Next Page >