Search Results

Search found 22756 results on 911 pages for 'power query'.

Page 202/911 | < Previous Page | 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209  | Next Page >

  • mysql database normalization question

    - by Chocho
    here is my 3 tables: table 1 -- stores user information and it has unique data table 2 -- stores place category such as, toronto, ny, london, etc hence this is is also unique table 3 -- has duplicate information. it stores all the places a user have been. the 3 tables are linked or joined by these ids: table 1 has an "table1_id" table 2 has an "table2_id" and "place_name" table 3 has an "table3_id", "table1_id", "place_name" i have an interface where an admin sees all users. beside a user is "edit" button. clicking on that edit button allows you to edit a specific user in a form fields which has a multiple drop down box for "places". if an admin edits a user and add 1 "places" for the user, i insert that information using php. if the admin decides to deselect that 1 "places" do i delete it or mark it as on and off? how about if the admin decides to select 2 "places" for the user; change the first "places" and add an additional "places". will my table just keep growing and will i have just redundant information? thanks.

    Read the article

  • Query optimization (OR based)

    - by john194
    I have googled but I can't find answers for these questions. Your advice is appreciated. centOS on vps with 512MB RAM, nginx, php5 (fastcgi), mysql5 (myisam, not innodb). I need to optimize this app created by some ex-employee. This app is working, but it's slow. Table: t1(id[bigint(20)],c1[mediumtext],c2[mediumtext],c3[mediumtext],c4[mediumtext]) id is some random big number, and is PK Those mediumtext rows look like this: c1="|box-002877|" c2="|ct-2348|rd-11124854|hw-3949|wd-8872|hw-119037736|...etc.. " c3="|fg-2448|wd-11172|hw-1656|...etc.. " c4="|hg-2448|qd-16667|...etc." (some columns contain a lot of data, around 900 KiB, database around 300 MiB) Yes, mediumtext "is bad", and (20) is too big... but I didn't create this. Those codes can be found on any of those 4 mediumtext's... //he needs all the columns of the row containing $code, so he wrote this: function f1($code) { SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c1 LIKE '%$code%' OR c2 LIKE '%$code%' OR c3 LIKE '%$code%' OR c4 LIKE '%$code%'; Questions: Q1. If $code is found on c1... mysql automatically stops checking and returns row=id+c1+c2+c3+c4? or it will continue (wasting time) checking c2, c3 and c4?... Q2. Mysql is working with this table on disk (not RAM) because of the mediumtext, right? is this the primary cause of slowness? Q3. That query can be cached by mysql (if using a big query_cache_size=128M value on the my.cnf)? or that's not cacheable due to the mediumtexts, or due to the "OR LIKE"...? Q4. Do you recommend rewriting this with mysql's INSTR() / LOCATE() / MATCH..AGAINST [FULLTEXT]?

    Read the article

  • How can I update multiple columns with a Replace in SQL server?

    - by Kettenbach
    How do I update different columns and rows across a table? I want to do something similiar to replace a string in SQL server I want to do this but the value exists in multiple columns of the same type. The values are foreign keys varchars to an employee table. Each column represents a task, so the same employee may be assigned to several tasks in a record and those tasks will vary between records. How can I do this effectively? Basically something of a replace all accross varying columns throughout a table. Thanks for any help or advice. Cheers, ~ck in San Diego

    Read the article

  • The "first past the post election" query problem

    - by MPelletier
    This problem may seem like school work, but it isn't. At best it is self-imposed school work. I encourage any teachers to take is as an example if they wish. "First past the post" elections are single-round, meaning that whoever gets the most votes win, no second rounds. Suppose a table for an election. CREATE TABLE ElectionResults ( DistrictHnd INTEGER NOT NULL, PartyHnd INTEGER NOT NULL, CandidateName VARCHAR2(100) NOT NULL, TotalVotes INTEGER NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY DistrictHnd, PartyHnd); The table has two foreign keys: DistrictHnd points to a District table (lists all the different electoral districts) and PartyHnd points to a Party table (lists all the different political parties). I won't bother with other tables here, joining them is trivial. This is just a wee bit of context. The question: What SQL query will return a table listing the DistrictHnd, PartyHnd, CandidateName and TotalVotes of the winners (max votes) in each District? This does not suppose any particular database system. If you wish to stick to a particular implementation of SQL, go the way of SQLite and MySQL. If you can devise a better schema (or an easier one), that is acceptable too. Criteria: simplicity, portability to other databases.

    Read the article

  • Indexing only one MySQL column value

    - by BrainCore
    I have a MySQL InnoDB table with a status column. The status can be 'done' or 'processing'. As the table grows, at most .1% of the status values will be 'processing,' whereas the other 99.9% of the values will be 'done.' This seems like a great candidate for an index due to the high selectivity for 'processing' (though not for 'done'). Is it possible to create an index for the status column that only indexes the value 'processing'? I do not want the index to waste an enormous amount of space indexing 'done.'

    Read the article

  • how to select the min value using having key word

    - by LOVE_KING
    I have created the table stu_dep_det CREATE TABLE `stu_dept_cs` ( `s_d_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `stu_name` varchar(15) , `gender` varchar(15) , `address` varchar(15),`reg_no` int(10) , `ex_no` varchar(10) , `mark1` varchar(10) , `mark2` varchar(15) , `mark3` varchar(15) , `total` varchar(15) , `avg` double(2,0), PRIMARY KEY (`s_d_id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC AUTO_INCREMENT=8 ; then Inserted the values INSERT INTO `stu_dept_cs` (`s_d_id`, `stu_name`, `gender`, `address`, `reg_no`, `ex_no`, `mark1`, `mark2`, `mark3`, `total`, `avg`) VALUES (1, 'alex', 'm', 'chennai', 5001, 's1', '70', '90', '95', '255', 85), (2, 'peter', 'm', 'chennai', 5002, 's1', '80', '70', '90', '240', 80), (6, 'parv', 'f', 'mumbai', 5003, 's1', '88', '60', '80', '228', 76), (7, 'basu', 'm', 'kolkatta', 5004, 's1', '85', '95', '56', '236', 79); I want to select the min(avg) using having keyword and I have used the following sql statement SELECT * FROM stu_dept_cs s having min(avg) Is it correct or not plz write the correct ans....

    Read the article

  • SQL Query - group by more than one column, but distinct

    - by Ranhiru
    I have a bidding table, as follows: SellID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES SellItem(SellID), CusID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Customer(CusID), Amount FLOAT NOT NULL, BidTime DATETIME DEFAULT getdate() Now in my website I need to show the user the current bids; only the highest bid but without repeating the same user. SELECT CusID, Max(Amount) FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC This is the best I have achieved so far. This gives the CusID of each user with the maximum bid and it is ordered ascending. But I need to get the BidTime for each result as well. When I try to put the BidTime in to the query: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC I am told that "Column 'Bid.BidTime' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause." Thus I tried: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID, BidTime ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC But this returns all the rows. No distinction. Any suggestions on solving this issue?

    Read the article

  • Searching 2 fields at the same time

    - by donpal
    I have a table of first and last names firstname lastname --------- --------- Joe Robertson Sally Robert Jim Green Sandra Jordan I'm trying to search this table based on an input that consists of the full name. For example: input: Joe Robert I thought about using SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE firstname LIKE BUT the table stores the first and last name separately, so I'm not sure how to do the search in this case

    Read the article

  • LINQ - How to query a range of effective dates that only has start dates

    - by itchi
    I'm using C# 3.5 and EntityFramework. I have a list of items in the database that contain interest rates. Unfortunately this list only contains the Effective Start Date. I need to query this list for all items within a range. However, I can't see a way to do this without querying the database twice. (Although I'm wondering if delayed execution with EntityFramework is making only one call.) Regardless, I'm wondering if I can do this without using my context twice. internal IQueryable<Interest> GetInterests(DateTime startDate, DateTime endDate) { var FirstDate = Context.All().Where(x => x.START_DATE < startDate).Max(x => x.START_DATE); IQueryable<Interest> listOfItems = Context.All().Where(x => x.START_DATE >= FirstDate && x.START_DATE <= endDate); return listOfItems; }

    Read the article

  • Semantic Grid System, Media Query issue

    - by Andy
    I'm using the Semantic Grid System to build a responsive site. However, something isn't quite right with the media queries that should obviously kick in once it hits a particular screen size. I'll reference what i mean with their example on the website : if I view this on my iPhone for example, given that it is supposed to adjust to a single column structure on a mobile device, it still throws out the web version of the page. That is true for both Safari and Chrome on my iPhone. However, if I use the RWD bookmarklet to check it's appearance at different resolutions it appears as expected for the mobile resolution. Also, ironically, if I resize the page in Safari on my desktop it also adjusts accordingly once I get down to the approriate screen size, but not in Firefox. The media query that it uses once it hits 720px is @media screen and (max-width: 720px) { #maincolumn, #sidebar { .column(12); margin-bottom: 1em; } } and I might be wide of the mark here but I think that must be the issue. But given that this is directly from the semantic.gs website I'm not inclined to question their own code. Any idea what the problem might be?

    Read the article

  • What can cause legit MySql INSERT INTO command to fail?

    - by Makis
    I can't figure out what's causing my INSERT INTO's to fail to certain table in MySql. I can manage them to other tables. The table looks like: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `Match` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `match_no` int(11) NOT NULL, `season` int(11) NOT NULL, `hometeam` int(11) NOT NULL, `awayteam` int(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `match_no` (`match_no`), KEY `season` (`season`), KEY `hometeam` (`hometeam`), KEY `awayteam` (`awayteam`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ; And the command is INSERT INTO Match (`match_no`, `season`, `hometeam`, `awaytem`) VALUES (1, 1, 2, 3) All I get is: 1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'Match (match_no, season, hometeam, awaytem) VALUES (1, 1, 2, 3)' at line 1 I have checked the manual and half-a-dozen examples from the web and whatnought and tried all sorts of changes to the syntax in case there is some MySql specific oddity, but nothing seems to work.

    Read the article

  • Problem with SQL, ResultSet in java

    - by aphex
    How can I iterate ResultSet ? I've tried with the following code, but i get the error java.sql.SQLException: Illegal operation on empty result set. while ( !rs.isLast()) { rs.next(); int id = rs.getInt("person_id"); SQL.getInstance().getSt().execute("INSERT ref_person_pub(person_id) VALUES(" + id + ")"); }

    Read the article

  • JPA - FindByExample

    - by HDave
    Does anyone have a good example for how to do a findByExample in JPA? I know I can do it via my provider (Hibernate), but I don't want to break with neutrality... Seems like the criteria API might be the way to go....but I am not sure.

    Read the article

  • SQL Joining Two or More from Table B with Common Data in Table A

    - by Matthew Frederick
    The real-world situation is a series of events that each have two or more participants (like sports teams, though there can be more than two in an event), only one of which is the host of the event. There is an Event db table for each unique event and a Participant db table with unique participants. They are joined together using a Matchup table. They look like this: Event EventID (PK) (other event data like the date, etc.) Participant ParticipantID (PK) Name Matchup EventID (FK to Event table) ParicipantID (FK to Participant) Host (1 or 0, only 1 host = 1 per EventID) What I'd like to get as a result is something like this: EventID ParticipantID where host = 1 Participant.Name where host = 1 ParticipantID where host = 0 Participant.Name where host = 0 ParticipantID where host = 0 Participant.Name where host = 0 ... Where one event has 2 participants and another has 3 participants, for example, the third participant column data would be null or otherwise noticeable, something like (PID = ParticipantID): EventID PID-1(host) Name-1 (host) PID-2 Name-2 PID-3 Name-3 ------- ----------- ------------- ----- ------ ----- ------ 1 7 Lions 8 Tigers 12 Bears 2 11 Dogs 9 Cats NULL NULL I suspect the answer is reasonably straightforward but for some reason I'm not wrapping my head around it. Alternately it's very difficult. :) I'm using MYSQL 5 if that affects the available SQL.

    Read the article

  • nested sql statment using and

    - by klay
    hi guys, how to make this work in mysql? select ID,COMPANY_NAME,contact1, SUBURB, CATEGORY, PHONE from Victoria where (city in ( select suburb from allsuburbs)) and CATEGORY='Banks' this below statement is working: select ID,COMPANY_NAME,contact1, SUBURB, CATEGORY, PHONE from Victoria where city in ( select suburb from allsuburbs) if I add "and" , it gives me an empty resultset, thanks

    Read the article

  • Apply a recursive CTE on grouped table rows (SQL server 2005).

    - by Evan V.
    Hi all, I have a table (ROOMUSAGE) containing the times people check in and out of rooms grouped by PERSONKEY and ROOMKEY. It looks like this: PERSONKEY | ROOMKEY | CHECKIN | CHECKOUT | ROW ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 10:00 | 13-4-2010 11:00 | 1 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 08:00 | 13-4-2010 09:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 13:00 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 3 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 2 I want to select just the consecutive rows for each PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY grouping. So the desired resulting table is: PERSONKEY | ROOMKEY | CHECKIN | CHECKOUT | ROW ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 10:00 | 13-4-2010 11:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 13:00 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 3 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 I want to avoid using cursors so I thought I would use a recursive CTE. Here is what I came up with: ;with CTE (PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY, CHECKIN, CHECKOUT, ROW) as (select RU.PERSONKEY, RU.ROOMKEY, RU.CHECKIN, RU.CHECKOUT, RU.ROW from ROOMUSAGE RU where RU.ROW = 1 union all select RU.PERSONKEY, RU.ROOMKEY, RU.CHECKIN, RU.CHECKOUT, RU.ROW from ROOMUSAGE RU inner join CTE on RU.ROWNUM = CTE.ROWNUM + 1 where CTE.CHECKIN = RU.CHECKOUT and CTE.PERSONKEY = RU.PERSONKEY and CTE.ROOMKEY = RU.ROOMKEY) This worked OK for very small datasets (under 100 records) but it's unusable on large datasets. I'm thinking that I should somehow apply the cte recursevely on each PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY grouping on my ROOMUSAGE table but I am not sure how to do that. Any help would be much appreciated, Cheers!

    Read the article

  • create new db in mysql with php syntax

    - by Jacksta
    I am trying to create a new db called testDB2, below is my code. Once running the script all I am getting an error on line 7 Fatal error: Call to undefined function mysqlquery() in /home/admin/domains/domain.com.au/public_html/db_createdb.php on line 7 This is my code <? $sql = "CREATE database testDB2"; $connection = mysql_connect("localhost", "admin_user", "pass") or die(mysql_error()); $result = mysqlquery($sql, $connection) or die(mysql_error()); if ($result) { $msg = "<p>Databse has been created!</p>"; } ?> <HTML> <head> <title>Create MySQL database</title> </head> <body> <? echo "$msg"; ?> </body> </HTML>

    Read the article

  • php warning mysql_fetch_assoc

    - by death the kid
    I am trying to access some information from mysql, but am getting the warning: mysql_fetch_assoc(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource for the second line of code below, any help would be much appreciated. $musicfiles=getmusicfiles($records['m_id']); $mus=mysql_fetch_assoc($musicfiles); for($j=0;$j<2;$j++) { if(file_exists($mus['musicpath'])) { echo '<a href="'.$mus['musicpath'].'">'.$mus['musicname'].'</a>'; } else { echo 'Hello world'; } } function getmusicfiles($m_id) { $music="select * from music WHERE itemid=".$s_id; $result=getQuery($music,$l); return $result; }

    Read the article

  • ALTER TABLE on dependant column

    - by Sharmi
    I am trying to alter column datatype of a primary key to tinyint from int.This column is a foreign key in other tables.So,I get the following error: Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'PK_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'FK_Details_tbl_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'FK_Log_tbl_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 4922, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN appId failed because one or more objects access this column. Howw should i rectify this?

    Read the article

  • How to merge two tables based on common column and sort the results by date

    - by techiepark
    Hello friends, I have two mysql tables and i want to merge the results of these two tables based on the common column rev_id. The merged results should be sorted by the date of two tables. Please help me. CREATE TABLE `reply` ( `id` int(3) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(25) NOT NULL default '', `member_id` varchar(45) NOT NULL, `rev_id` int(3) NOT NULL default '0', `description` text, `post_date` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, `flag` char(2) NOT NULL default 'N', PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `member_id` (`member_id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM; CREATE TABLE `comment` ( `com_id` int(8) NOT NULL auto_increment, `rev_id` int(5) NOT NULL default '0', `member_id` varchar(50) NOT NULL, `comm_desc` text NOT NULL, `date_created` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, PRIMARY KEY (`com_id`), KEY `member_id` (`member_id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM;

    Read the article

  • Mysql Groupby and Orderby problem

    - by luvboy
    Here is my data structure when i try this sql select rec_id, customer_id, dc_number, balance from payments where customer_id='IHS050018' group by dc_number order by rec_id desc; something is wrong somewhere, idk I need rec_id customer_id dc_number balance 2 IHS050018 DC3 -1 3 IHS050018 52 600 Thanx

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to "merge" the values of multiple records into a single field without using a stored

    - by j0rd4n
    A co-worker posed this question to me, and I told them, "No, you'll need to write a sproc for that". But I thought I'd give them a chance and put this out to the community. Essentially, they have a table with keys mapping to multiple values. For a report, they want to aggregate on the key and "mash" all of the values into a single field. Here's a visual: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A 1 B 1 C 2 X 2 Y The result would be as follows: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A,B,C 2 X,Y They need this in SQLServer 2005. Again, I think they need to write a stored procedure, but if anyone knows a magic out-of-the-box function that does this, I'd be impressed.

    Read the article

  • MySQL INSERT with table alias

    - by Max Kielland
    Hello, I happen to have two columns having the same name as two SQL reserved words, Key and Value. When using the SELECT statement I can create a table alias and solve it that way. Now I'm trying to INSERT data and it seems like you can't create table alias in the INSERT statement. INSERT INTO attributeStrings ats (ats.ItemID,ats.Key,ats.Value) VALUES (3,'Categories','TechGUI') I get error at 'ats (ats.ItemID,ats.Key,ats.Value) VALUES (3,'Categories','TechGUI')' indicating that alias can't be created. Are there any ways to solve this without renaming the columns Key and Value?

    Read the article

  • [MYSQL] Select users who own both a dog and a cat

    - by matte
    Hi, I have this sample table: CREATE TABLE `dummy` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `userId` int(11) NOT NULL, `pet` varchar(50) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=7 ; INSERT INTO `dummy` (`id`, `userId`, `pet`) VALUES(1, 1, 'dog'); INSERT INTO `dummy` (`id`, `userId`, `pet`) VALUES(2, 1, 'cat'); INSERT INTO `dummy` (`id`, `userId`, `pet`) VALUES(3, 2, 'dog'); INSERT INTO `dummy` (`id`, `userId`, `pet`) VALUES(4, 2, 'cat'); INSERT INTO `dummy` (`id`, `userId`, `pet`) VALUES(5, 3, 'cat'); INSERT INTO `dummy` (`id`, `userId`, `pet`) VALUES(6, 4, 'dog'); How can I write the statements below in mysql: Retrieve all users who own both a dog and a cat Retrieve all users who own a dog or a cat Retrieve all users who own only a cat Retrieve all users who doesn't own a cat Thanks!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209  | Next Page >