Search Results

Search found 18385 results on 736 pages for 'flash memory'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 204/736 | < Previous Page | 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211  | Next Page >

  • JVM memory initializazion error after windows update

    - by gianni
    We have three Windows Server 2003 with 2 GB RAM. Server1 tomcat 5.5.25 jvm version SUN 1.6.0_11-b03 Server2 tomcat 5.5.25 jvm version SUN 1.6.0_14-b08 Server3 tomcat 6.0.18 jvm version SUN 1.6.0_14-b08 For the three servers JVM parameters are: -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Dcatalina.base=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25 -Dcatalina.home=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25 -Djava.endorsed.dirs=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25\common\endorsed -Djava.io.tmpdir=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25\temp vfprintf -Xms512m -Xmx1024m For some months everithing worked fine. Last friday we installed some windows updates. After the reboot tomcat doesnt start with error: Error occurred during initialization of VM Could not reserve enough space for object heap We reduced the parameter -Xmx1024m to -Xmx768m and now tomcat starts. But we need greater max heap size What happened to our servers ? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Make flash drive bootable with MULTIPLE Windows Installers

    - by alexander7567
    I have seen many ways to make a USB an installer for about any Windows OS. But how can I (using grub or something like that) make it bootable to all editions on Windows XP and 7? I have tried Googling it and researching, I've even tried to do it, But I dont understand much about GRUB or linux at all. Please keep in mind that I am not very good with linux, so please use as many details as possible.

    Read the article

  • saslauthd using too much memory

    - by Brian Armstrong
    Woke up today to see my site slow/unresponsive. Pulled up top and it looks like a ton of saslauthd processes have spun up using about 64m of RAM each, causing the machine to enter swap space. I've never seen this many used on there. top - 16:54:13 up 85 days, 11:48, 1 user, load average: 0.32, 0.50, 0.38 Tasks: 143 total, 1 running, 142 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.7%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.3%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 1.4%st Mem: 1048796k total, 1025904k used, 22892k free, 14032k buffers Swap: 2097144k total, 332460k used, 1764684k free, 194348k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 848 admin 20 0 263m 115m 4840 S 0 11.3 5:02.91 ruby 906 admin 20 0 265m 113m 4828 S 0 11.1 5:37.24 ruby 30484 admin 20 0 248m 91m 4256 S 6 9.0 219:02.30 delayed_job 4075 root 20 0 160m 65m 952 S 0 6.4 0:24.22 saslauthd 4080 root 20 0 162m 64m 936 S 0 6.3 0:24.48 saslauthd 4079 root 20 0 162m 64m 936 S 0 6.3 0:24.70 saslauthd 4078 root 20 0 164m 63m 936 S 0 6.2 0:24.66 saslauthd 4077 root 20 0 163m 62m 936 S 0 6.1 0:24.66 saslauthd 3718 mysql 20 0 312m 52m 3588 S 1 5.1 3499:40 mysqld 699 root 20 0 72744 7640 2164 S 0 0.7 0:00.50 ruby 15701 postfix 20 0 106m 5712 4164 S 1 0.5 0:00.50 smtpd 15702 postfix 20 0 52444 3252 2452 S 1 0.3 0:00.06 cleanup 4062 postfix 20 0 41884 3104 1788 S 0 0.3 125:26.01 qmgr 15683 root 20 0 51504 2780 2180 S 0 0.3 0:00.04 sshd 14595 postfix 20 0 52308 2548 2304 S 1 0.2 0:24.60 proxymap 15483 postfix 20 0 43380 2544 1992 S 0 0.2 0:00.38 smtp 15486 postfix 20 0 43380 2544 1992 S 0 0.2 0:00.36 smtp 15488 postfix 20 0 43380 2540 1992 S 0 0.2 0:00.38 smtp 15485 postfix 20 0 43380 2532 1984 S 0 0.2 0:00.36 smtp 15489 postfix 20 0 43380 2532 1984 S 0 0.2 0:00.40 smtp Wasn't sure what Saslauthd is, Google says it handles plantext authentication. The machine has been sending a lot of email through postfix, so this could be related. Anyone know why so many may have spun up? Are they safe to kill? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Sharing two SSL wildcard certificates in memory in nginx

    - by hvtilborg
    I have an nginx server running with two IP addresses, say 1.2.3.4 and 4.3.2.1. Besides there are two wildcard SSL certificates for *.example.net (i.e. wc1, pointing to 1.2.3.4) and *.sub.example.net (i.e. wc2, pointing to 4.3.2.1). The nginx docs mention that you can share a wildcard certificate between server instances like this: ssl_certificate wc1.crt; ssl_certificate_key wc1.key; server { listen 1.2.3.4:443; server_name www.example.net; ssl on; ... } server { listen 1.2.3.4:443; server_name test.example.net; ssl on; ... } However, I was wondering whether this same construct is possible to use with the second wildcard certificate too. Both domains have around 500 subdomains. Do they not get mixed up, since the ssl_certificate construct is now global?

    Read the article

  • What is consuming memory?

    - by Milan Babuškov
    Feel free to change the question title. I have a VPS with standard LAMP stack and a busy website. Operating system is CentOS 5.5. Virtualization is done with VMWare. My server gets real slow about every 6 hours. Logging into it I see that 1.6GB of RAM is consumed. However, listing the active processes does not explain the problem. Can anyone make any sense of this? "free" shows this: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 2059456 2049280 10176 0 14780 380968 -/+ buffers/cache: 1653532 405924 Swap: 2096472 96 2096376 While this is output of "ps": [root@vmi29 /]# ps aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 1 0.0 0.0 10348 688 ? Rs Jun05 0:01 init [3] root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [migration/0] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN Jun05 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0] root 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [migration/1] root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN Jun05 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1] root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [migration/2] root 7 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN Jun05 0:00 [ksoftirqd/2] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [migration/3] root 9 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN Jun05 0:00 [ksoftirqd/3] root 10 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:06 [events/0] root 11 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [events/1] root 12 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [events/2] root 13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [events/3] root 14 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [khelper] root 31 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kthread] root 38 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kblockd/0] root 39 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kblockd/1] root 40 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kblockd/2] root 41 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kblockd/3] root 42 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kacpid] root 204 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [cqueue/0] root 205 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [cqueue/1] root 206 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [cqueue/2] root 207 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [cqueue/3] root 210 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [khubd] root 212 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kseriod] root 302 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jun05 0:00 [khungtaskd] root 303 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jun05 0:00 [pdflush] root 304 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jun05 0:01 [pdflush] root 305 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:05 [kswapd0] root 306 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [aio/0] root 307 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [aio/1] root 308 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [aio/2] root 309 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [aio/3] root 515 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kpsmoused] root 582 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [mpt_poll_0] root 583 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [mpt/0] root 584 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [scsi_eh_0] root 590 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [ata/0] root 591 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [ata/1] root 592 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [ata/2] root 593 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [ata/3] root 594 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [ata_aux] root 610 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kstriped] root 631 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:05 [kjournald] root 656 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kauditd] root 689 0.0 0.0 13364 928 ? S<s Jun05 0:00 /sbin/udevd -d root 2123 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kmpathd/0] root 2124 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kmpathd/1] root 2126 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kmpathd/2] root 2127 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kmpathd/3] root 2128 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kmpath_handlerd] root 2203 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jun05 0:00 [kjournald] root 2613 0.0 0.0 5908 648 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 syslogd -m 0 root 2617 0.0 0.0 3804 424 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 klogd -x root 2707 0.0 0.0 10760 372 ? Ss Jun05 0:02 irqbalance apache 2910 0.5 0.6 213964 12912 ? S 00:22 0:07 /usr/sbin/httpd dbus 3011 0.0 0.0 21256 904 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 dbus-daemon --system root 3025 0.0 0.0 3800 576 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 /usr/sbin/acpid 68 3038 0.0 0.2 31152 4336 ? Ss Jun05 0:01 hald root 3039 0.0 0.0 21692 1176 ? S Jun05 0:00 hald-runner 68 3046 0.0 0.0 12324 856 ? S Jun05 0:00 hald-addon-acpi: listening on acpid socket /var/run/acpid.s 68 3052 0.0 0.0 12324 856 ? S Jun05 0:00 hald-addon-keyboard: listening on /dev/input/event0 root 3105 0.0 0.0 62624 1212 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd root 3264 0.0 0.0 74820 1156 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 crond root 3292 0.0 0.0 18416 472 ? S Jun05 0:00 /usr/sbin/smartd -q never root 3300 0.0 0.0 3792 480 tty2 Ss+ Jun05 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty2 root 3301 0.0 0.0 3792 480 tty3 Ss+ Jun05 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty3 root 3302 0.0 0.0 3792 484 tty4 Ss+ Jun05 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty4 root 3304 0.0 0.0 3792 480 tty5 Ss+ Jun05 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty5 root 3306 0.0 0.0 3792 480 tty6 Ss+ Jun05 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty6 apache 5158 0.4 0.5 211896 11848 ? S 00:28 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 5519 0.4 0.5 211896 11992 ? S 00:29 0:03 /usr/sbin/httpd root 5649 0.0 0.0 63848 1184 pts/0 S Jun05 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/mysqld_safe --datadir=/var/lib/mysql --soc mysql 5696 2.1 1.9 411060 40392 pts/0 Rl Jun05 2:01 /usr/libexec/mysqld --basedir=/usr --datadir=/var/lib/mysql apache 5943 0.4 0.5 211896 12000 ? S 00:30 0:03 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 5976 0.6 0.5 211896 11792 ? S 00:30 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6073 0.4 0.5 211896 11208 ? S 00:31 0:03 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6122 0.4 0.5 211896 11848 ? S 00:31 0:03 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6128 0.3 0.5 211896 11940 ? S 00:31 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6159 0.5 0.5 211896 11872 ? S 00:31 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6636 0.4 0.6 213960 13444 ? S 00:32 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6787 0.3 0.5 211884 11308 ? S 00:33 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6796 0.4 0.5 211884 12024 ? S 00:33 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6801 0.3 0.5 211896 11920 ? S 00:33 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6804 0.4 0.5 211884 11848 ? S 00:33 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6825 0.4 0.5 211896 11972 ? S 00:33 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6866 0.3 0.5 210860 11044 ? S 00:33 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6870 0.2 0.5 211896 11108 ? S 00:33 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6872 0.3 0.5 211896 11900 ? S 00:33 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6993 0.3 0.5 211896 11836 ? S 00:33 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 6994 0.3 0.5 211896 11792 ? S 00:33 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7136 0.2 0.5 211896 11432 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7143 0.2 0.5 210860 11052 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7145 0.2 0.5 211896 11136 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7266 0.2 0.6 213952 12748 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7299 0.2 0.5 211884 11276 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7311 0.2 0.5 211884 11300 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7313 0.3 0.5 211884 11876 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7345 0.2 0.5 210872 11100 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7349 0.2 0.5 210860 11008 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7350 0.2 0.5 211896 11832 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7351 0.1 0.5 211884 11072 ? S 00:34 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7352 0.2 0.5 210872 11096 ? S 00:34 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7449 0.1 0.5 210860 11020 ? S 00:35 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd root 7490 0.3 0.0 0 0 ? S Jun05 3:11 [vmmemctl] root 7597 0.0 0.0 72656 1260 ? Ss Jun05 0:06 /usr/lib/vmware-tools/sbin64/vmware-guestd --background /va apache 7720 0.1 0.5 210860 10748 ? S 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7726 0.1 0.4 209836 9304 ? R 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7727 0.1 0.5 210860 10916 ? S 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7731 0.1 0.5 210860 10780 ? S 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7732 0.3 0.5 210860 10916 ? S 00:36 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7733 0.1 0.5 210872 11000 ? S 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7735 0.1 0.5 211884 11048 ? S 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7761 0.1 0.5 210860 10552 ? S 00:36 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7776 0.1 0.4 209836 8648 ? R 00:37 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7790 0.2 0.3 208812 7724 ? R 00:40 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7800 0.2 0.3 208812 8088 ? R 00:40 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd root 7801 0.0 0.0 3792 484 tty1 Ss+ 00:41 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty1 apache 7820 0.2 0.3 208812 7552 ? R 00:41 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7834 0.2 0.3 207788 6756 ? R 00:42 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7864 0.2 0.2 207788 6148 ? R 00:42 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7872 0.3 0.2 207788 5856 ? R 00:43 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7874 2.5 0.3 207788 6336 ? R 00:43 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd root 7875 0.3 0.0 63844 1056 ? S 00:43 0:00 sh -c lsb_release -sd 2>/dev/null root 7879 1.6 0.0 65604 964 pts/0 R+ 00:43 0:00 ps aux root 16316 0.0 0.1 90128 3272 ? Ss Jun05 0:00 sshd: milanb [priv] milanb 16358 0.0 0.0 90128 1752 ? S Jun05 0:00 sshd: milanb@pts/0 milanb 16360 0.0 0.0 66076 1480 pts/0 Ss Jun05 0:00 -bash root 16875 0.0 0.0 101068 1324 pts/0 S Jun05 0:00 su - root 16877 0.0 0.0 66184 1692 pts/0 S Jun05 0:00 -bash root 24373 0.0 0.3 206764 7348 ? Rs Jun05 0:01 /usr/sbin/httpd

    Read the article

  • HIGH CPU USAGE + low memory usage

    - by hadi
    as you can see in below , there are high cpu usage by httpd request. please help me to decrease them. thanks. 28577 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3488 S 21 0.2 1:13.67 httpd 28568 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3496 S 19 0.2 1:14.92 httpd 28608 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3428 R 19 0.2 0:28.28 httpd 28615 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3436 R 19 0.2 0:25.33 httpd 28616 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3440 S 19 0.2 0:25.83 httpd 28619 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3436 R 19 0.2 0:26.12 httpd 28635 apache 15 0 97.9m 54m 3416 S 19 0.2 0:24.86 httpd 28558 apache 15 0 97.9m 54m 3432 R 17 0.2 1:40.75 httpd 28560 apache 15 0 97.9m 54m 3496 R 17 0.2 1:40.02 httpd 28621 apache 15 0 97.9m 54m 3420 S 17 0.2 0:25.61 httpd 28641 apache 16 0 97.9m 54m 3428 R 17 0.2 0:21.52 httpd 28642 apache 15 0 99756 53m 3424 R 15 0.2 0:21.46 httpd 28643 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3424 S 15 0.2 0:21.59 httpd 28594 apache 15 0 99756 53m 3428 R 13 0.2 0:44.41 httpd 28618 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3420 S 13 0.2 0:26.15 httpd 28654 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3472 S 13 0.2 0:04.27 httpd 28575 apache 15 0 99756 53m 3436 R 11 0.2 1:14.02 httpd 28576 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3496 S 11 0.2 1:16.79 httpd 28634 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3436 S 11 0.2 0:25.36 httpd 28653 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3424 S 11 0.2 0:04.35 httpd 28574 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3440 S 10 0.2 1:13.05 httpd 28592 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3492 R 10 0.2 0:45.78 httpd 28595 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3432 R 10 0.2 0:47.02 httpd 28617 apache 16 0 99676 53m 3436 S 10 0.2 0:25.32 httpd 28620 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3432 S 10 0.2 0:25.35 httpd 28597 apache 15 0 99676 53m 3428 S 8 0.2 0:43.56 httpd 11345 mysql 15 0 2927m 198m 4472 R 4 0.6 1624:43 mysqld 1 root 15 0 2036 648 552 S 0 0.0 0:16.97 init 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:48.50 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:26.72 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 5 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:04.98 migration/1 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 R 0 0.0 0:27.51 ksoftirqd/1 7 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1 8 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:15.42 migration/2 9 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:26.50 ksoftirqd/2 10 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/2

    Read the article

  • Making a Ligthing Flash Magento store with Nginx on AWS Elastic Beanstalk with Minimum Resource Utilization

    - by Junaid
    I'm going to install Magento on AWS Elastic Beanstalk t1.micro (free tier), on Windows or Linux + Nginx + Php-fpm + eAccelerator, CDN (cloudfront), MemcacheD. I will ask my developer to make my website as fast as it can be with as much as possible, minimum AWS utilization. My webstore will have <1000 SKUs and I'm not expecting the traffic without going into thorough SEO/PPC. Now I have three questions: Do I really need Nginx microcaching along with eaccelerator? Do I need AWS Elastic Load Balancer with t1.micro tier for the sake of scalability (as I have heard that magento is resource hungry application, may fully utilize t1.micro AMI) or can I replace AWS ELB with Nginx load balancer? In AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

    Read the article

  • Streaming Flash Video - getting my feet wet

    - by Travis
    I'm working on a project that will involve having a couple thousand short videos online. I haven't done anything with online video before and this is all a bit new to me, so I am looking for some general advice... I would like to use Flowplayer, and I would like to encode the videos as H264s. I am enamoured with Flowplayer's slow motion feature, which if I understand correctly, is only available using a Wowza server. I'm wondering: Is it advisable to use a delivery network of some sort? (Flowplayer seems to have a partnership with HDDN, and recommends them. http://www.hddn.com/) Or would I be better off purchasing Wowza and installing it on our own server? (At first glance, it looks as though signing up with a network like HDDN is much simpler, but perhaps there are problems that come along with this...?) Any tips / warnings of imminent peril would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • USB Flash not recognised by Windows and BIOS, but works fine in Linux

    - by bbalegere
    I have a Transcend JetFLash 2GB USB Drive.It was working fine and I had been using it occasionally. All of sudden it stopped working in all versions of Windows . The USB Drive is also not recognised by the BIOS.It does not show in the list of bootable devices.(It used show up in the list earlier) However the USB Drive works fine in my Linux Mint 11 OS. Running dmesg gives this [ 941.812192] usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [ 941.936178] usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 [ 942.164188] usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 [ 942.380189] usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5 [ 942.504138] usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 [ 942.732179] usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 [ 942.948154] usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 6 [ 943.364134] usb 1-2: device not accepting address 6, error -71 [ 943.476172] usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7 [ 943.892140] usb 1-2: device not accepting address 7, error -71 [ 943.892191] hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 2 [ 944.296190] usb 2-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 [ 944.438251] usb 2-2: not running at top speed; connect to a high speed hub [ 944.709928] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas [ 944.729999] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... [ 944.730509] scsi6 : usb-storage 2-2:1.0 [ 944.730908] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage [ 944.730917] USB Mass Storage support registered. [ 945.736320] scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access JetFlash Transcend 2GB 8.07 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 945.744547] sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 [ 945.753316] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] 3944448 512-byte logical blocks: (2.01 GB/1.88 GiB) [ 945.758274] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off [ 945.758288] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00 [ 945.765167] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page present [ 945.765181] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 945.784309] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page present [ 945.784323] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 946.239512] sdb: sdb1 [ 946.257279] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page present [ 946.257292] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 946.257302] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk Looks like there is something wrong the USB Drive.It is not recognised in any computer running Windows. Is there any way to fix this? Any idea why this problem occurred ?

    Read the article

  • How to confirm memcache memory increase?

    - by Peter Johansson
    Alright, I have downloaded /etc/sysconfig/memcache And edited the file that contained "PORT="11211" USER="memcached" MAXCONN="1024" CACHESIZE="64" OPTIONS="" to 1000 cachesize. I uploaded the file back to the server. Now I know there is a way to check if the changes took effect, but I cant remember how. I tried "memcached-tool 127.0.0.1:11211 stats" but it didnt show me the RAM size. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • how to solve out of memory error in java in amazon ec2 server

    - by sathishkumar
    can anyone explain about this error message? we are using IBM jre to run java application Its occupying more space on the server. JVMDUMP006I Processing dump event "systhrow", detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError" - please wait. JVMDUMP006I Processing dump event "systhrow", detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError" - please wait. JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Heap dump using '/home/sathish/jetty6/heapdump.20110417.114115.18926.0001.phd' in response to an event JVMDUMP010I Heap dump written to /home/sathish/jetty6/heapdump.20110417.114115.18926.0001.phd JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Heap dump using '/home/sathish/jetty6/heapdump.20110417.114115.18926.0002.phd' in response to an event JVMDUMP010I Heap dump written to /home/sathish/jetty6/heapdump.20110417.114115.18926.0002.phd JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Heap dump using '/home/sathish/jetty6/heapdump.20110417.114115.18926.0003.phd' in response to an event JVMDUMP010I Heap dump written to /home/sathish/jetty6/heapdump.20110417.114115.18926.0003.phd JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Java dump using '/home/sathish/jetty6/javacore.20110417.114115.18926.0004.txt' in response to an event JVMDUMP010I Java dump written to /home/sathish/jetty6/javacore.20110417.114115.18926.0004.txt

    Read the article

  • JVM memory initializazion error after windows update

    - by gianni
    We have three Windows Server 2003 with 2 GB RAM. Server1 tomcat 5.5.25 jvm version SUN 1.6.0_11-b03 Server2 tomcat 5.5.25 jvm version SUN 1.6.0_14-b08 Server3 tomcat 6.0.18 jvm version SUN 1.6.0_14-b08 For the three servers JVM parameters are: -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Dcatalina.base=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25 -Dcatalina.home=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25 -Djava.endorsed.dirs=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25\common\endorsed -Djava.io.tmpdir=C:\Programmi\Apache Group\apache-tomcat-5.5.25\temp vfprintf -Xms512m -Xmx1024m For some months everithing worked fine. Last friday we installed some windows updates. After the reboot tomcat doesnt start with error: Error occurred during initialization of VM Could not reserve enough space for object heap We reduced the parameter -Xmx1024m to -Xmx768m and now tomcat starts. But we need greater max heap size What happened to our servers ? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Support-Tool (SDK): Capture system information (Registry, Memory, etc.), Make a screenshoot, send an

    - by Robert
    I have the task to find or develop a support tool which has some very common (?) features: Send the following data as a email or to ticket system, after clicking a button like "get system summary" or "create ticket" Screen shoot System Summary Registry Log-Files Question(s): Are their any tools which have a similar functionality already (to buy or for inspiration). I their some kind of commercial or open source framework or tool set, which I can use as starting point or to customize?

    Read the article

  • Bootable SD card still has small memory, even after formating

    - by Inazuma
    I have an SD card which I used to run my RaspberryPi. I wanted to update the copy of raspbian on it, so I formated the card using the software from www.sdcard.com. I followed all the instructions correctly, however the size of my SD card didn't go back to it's default. It is a 4gb SD card, which after it's spell in the RaspberryPi had shrunken to 52mb, which I understand is normal. After formatting, the size rose to 3.69gb. This means that there is not enough space to install a new OS, so how can I make my SD card 4gb again? Any help would be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • e2fsck extremely slow, although enough memory exists

    - by kaefert
    I've got this external USB-Disk: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ lsusb -s 2:3 Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3320 Seagate RSS LLC As can be seen in this dmesg output, there is some problem that prevents that disk from beeing mounted: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ dmesg ... [ 113.084079] usb 2-1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd [ 113.217783] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0bc2, idProduct=3320 [ 113.217787] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3, SerialNumber=1 [ 113.217790] usb 2-1: Product: Expansion Desk [ 113.217792] usb 2-1: Manufacturer: Seagate [ 113.217794] usb 2-1: SerialNumber: NA4J4N6K [ 113.435404] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas [ 113.455315] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... [ 113.468051] scsi5 : usb-storage 2-1:1.0 [ 113.468180] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage [ 113.468182] USB Mass Storage support registered. [ 114.473105] scsi 5:0:0:0: Direct-Access Seagate Expansion Desk 070B PQ: 0 ANSI: 6 [ 114.474342] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.475089] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off [ 114.475092] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00 [ 114.475959] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [ 114.477093] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.501649] sdb: sdb1 [ 114.502717] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.504354] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk [ 116.804408] EXT4-fs (sdb1): ext4_check_descriptors: Checksum for group 3976 failed (47397!=61519) [ 116.804413] EXT4-fs (sdb1): group descriptors corrupted! ... So I went and fired up my favorite partition manager - gparted, and told it to verify and repair the partition sdb1. This made gparted call e2fsck (version 1.42.4 (12-Jun-2012)) e2fsck -f -y -v /dev/sdb1 Although gparted called e2fsck with the "-v" option, sadly it doesn't show me the output of my e2fsck process (bugreport https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467925 ) I started this whole thing on Sunday (2012-11-04_2200) evening, so about 48 hours ago, this is what htop says about it now (2012-11-06-1900): PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command 3704 root 39 19 1560M 1166M 768 R 98.0 19.5 42h56:43 e2fsck -f -y -v /dev/sdb1 Now I found a few posts on the internet that discuss e2fsck running slow, for example: http://gparted-forum.surf4.info/viewtopic.php?id=13613 where they write that its a good idea to see if the disk is just that slow because maybe its damaged, and I think these outputs tell me that this is not the case in my case: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 3562 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1783.29 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 82 MB in 3.01 seconds = 27.26 MB/sec kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo hdparm /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: multcount = 0 (off) readonly = 0 (off) readahead = 256 (on) geometry = 364801/255/63, sectors = 5860533160, start = 0 However, although I can read quickly from that disk, this disk speed doesn't seem to be used by e2fsck, considering tools like gkrellm or iotop or this: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ iostat -x Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (blechmobil) 2012-11-06 _x86_64_ (2 CPU) avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 14,24 47,81 14,63 0,95 0,00 22,37 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sda 0,59 8,29 2,42 5,14 43,17 160,17 53,75 0,30 39,80 8,72 54,42 3,95 2,99 sdb 137,54 5,48 9,23 0,20 587,07 22,73 129,35 0,07 7,70 7,51 16,18 2,17 2,04 Now I researched a little bit on how to find out what e2fsck is doing with all that processor time, and I found the tool strace, which gives me this: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo strace -p3704 lseek(4, 41026998272, SEEK_SET) = 41026998272 write(4, "\212\354K[_\361\3nl\212\245\352\255jR\303\354\312Yv\334p\253r\217\265\3567\325\257\3766"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404766720, SEEK_SET) = 48404766720 read(4, "\7t\260\366\346\337\304\210\33\267j\35\377'\31f\372\252\ffU\317.y\211\360\36\240c\30`\34"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 41027002368, SEEK_SET) = 41027002368 write(4, "\232]7Ws\321\352\t\1@[+5\263\334\276{\343zZx\352\21\316`1\271[\202\350R`"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404770816, SEEK_SET) = 48404770816 read(4, "\17\362r\230\327\25\346//\210H\v\311\3237\323K\304\306\361a\223\311\324\272?\213\tq \370\24"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 41027006464, SEEK_SET) = 41027006464 write(4, "\367yy>x\216?=\324Z\305\351\376&\25\244\210\271\22\306}\276\237\370(\214\205G\262\360\257#"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404774912, SEEK_SET) = 48404774912 read(4, "\365\25\0\21|T\0\21}3t_\272\373\222k\r\177\303\1\201\261\221$\261B\232\3142\21U\316"..., 4096) = 4096 ^CProcess 3704 detached around 16 of these lines every second, so 4 read and 4 write operations every second, which I don't consider to be a lot.. And finally, my question: Will this process ever finish? If those numbers from fseek (48404774912) represent bytes, that would be something like 45 gigabytes, with this beeing a 3 terrabyte disk, which would give me 134 days to go, if the speed stays constant, and e2fsck scans the disk like this completly and only once. Do you have some advice for me? I have most of the data on that disk elsewhere, but I've put a lot of hours into sorting and merging it to this disk, so I would prefer to getting this disk up and running again, without formatting it anew. I don't think that the hardware is damaged since the disk is only a few months and since I can't see any I/O errors in the dmesg output. UPDATE: I just looked at the strace output again (2012-11-06_2300), now it looks like this: lseek(4, 1419860611072, SEEK_SET) = 1419860611072 read(4, "3#\f\2447\335\0\22A\355\374\276j\204'\207|\217V|\23\245[\7VP\251\242\276\207\317:"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018145792, SEEK_SET) = 43018145792 write(4, "]\206\231\342Y\204-2I\362\242\344\6R\205\361\324\177\265\317C\334V\324\260\334\275t=\10F."..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 1419860615168, SEEK_SET) = 1419860615168 read(4, "\262\305\314Y\367\37x\326\245\226\226\320N\333$s\34\204\311\222\7\315\236\336\300TK\337\264\236\211n"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018149888, SEEK_SET) = 43018149888 write(4, "\271\224m\311\224\25!I\376\16;\377\0\223H\25Yd\201Y\342\r\203\271\24eG<\202{\373V"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 1419860619264, SEEK_SET) = 1419860619264 read(4, ";d\360\177\n\346\253\210\222|\250\352T\335M\33\260\320\261\7g\222P\344H?t\240\20\2548\310"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018153984, SEEK_SET) = 43018153984 write(4, "\360\252j\317\310\251G\227\335{\214`\341\267\31Y\202\360\v\374\307oq\3063\217Z\223\313\36D\211"..., 4096) = 4096 So the numbers in the lseek lines before the reads, like 1419860619264 are already a lot bigger, standing for 1.29 terabytes if those numbers are bytes, so it doesn't seem to be a linear progress on a big scale, maybe there are only some areas that need work, that have big gaps in between them. UPDATE2: Okey, big disappointment, the numbers are back to very small again (2012-11-07_0720) lseek(4, 52174548992, SEEK_SET) = 52174548992 read(4, "\374\312\22\\\325\215\213\23\0357U\222\246\370v^f(\312|f\212\362\343\375\373\342\4\204mU6"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 46603526144, SEEK_SET) = 46603526144 write(4, "\370\261\223\227\23?\4\4\217\264\320_Am\246CQ\313^\203U\253\274\204\277\2564n\227\177\267\343"..., 4096) = 4096 so either e2fsck goes over the data multiple times, or it just hops back and forth multiple times. Or my assumption that those numbers are bytes is wrong. UPDATE3: Since it's mentioned here http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=282125&page=2 that you can testisk while e2fsck is running, i tried that, though not with a lot of success. When asking testdisk to display the data of my partition, this is what I get: TestDisk 6.13, Data Recovery Utility, November 2011 Christophe GRENIER <[email protected]> http://www.cgsecurity.org 1 P Linux 0 4 5 45600 40 8 732566272 Can't open filesystem. Filesystem seems damaged. And this is what strace currently gives me (2012-11-07_1030) lseek(4, 212460343296, SEEK_SET) = 212460343296 read(4, "\315Mb\265v\377Gn \24\f\205EHh\2349~\330\273\203\3375\206\10\r3=W\210\372\352"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 47347830784, SEEK_SET) = 47347830784 write(4, "]\204\223\300I\357\4\26\33+\243\312G\230\250\371*m2U\t_\215\265J \252\342Pm\360D"..., 4096) = 4096 (times are in CET)

    Read the article

  • e2fsck extremly slow, although enough memory exists

    - by kaefert
    I've got this external USB-Disk: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ lsusb -s 2:3 Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3320 Seagate RSS LLC As can be seen in this dmesg output, there are some problems that prevents that disk from beeing mounted: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ dmesg | grep sdb [ 114.474342] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.475089] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off [ 114.475092] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00 [ 114.475959] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [ 114.477093] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.501649] sdb: sdb1 [ 114.502717] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.504354] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk [ 116.804408] EXT4-fs (sdb1): ext4_check_descriptors: Checksum for group 3976 failed (47397!=61519) [ 116.804413] EXT4-fs (sdb1): group descriptors corrupted! So I went and fired up my favorite partition manager - gparted, and told it to verify and repair the partition sdb1. This made gparted call e2fsck (version 1.42.4 (12-Jun-2012)) e2fsck -f -y -v /dev/sdb1 Although gparted called e2fsck with the "-v" option, sadly it doesn't show me the output of my e2fsck process (bugreport https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467925 ) I started this whole thing on Sunday (2012-11-04_2200) evening, so about 48 hours ago, this is what htop says about it now (2012-11-06-1900): PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command 3704 root 39 19 1560M 1166M 768 R 98.0 19.5 42h56:43 e2fsck -f -y -v /dev/sdb1 Now I found a few posts on the internet that discuss e2fsck running slow, for example: http://gparted-forum.surf4.info/viewtopic.php?id=13613 where they write that its a good idea to see if the disk is just that slow because maybe its damaged, and I think these outputs tell me that this is not the case in my case: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 3562 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1783.29 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 82 MB in 3.01 seconds = 27.26 MB/sec kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo hdparm /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: multcount = 0 (off) readonly = 0 (off) readahead = 256 (on) geometry = 364801/255/63, sectors = 5860533160, start = 0 However, although I can read quickly from that disk, this disk speed doesn't seem to be used by e2fsck, considering tools like gkrellm or iotop or this: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ iostat -x Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (blechmobil) 2012-11-06 _x86_64_ (2 CPU) avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 14,24 47,81 14,63 0,95 0,00 22,37 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sda 0,59 8,29 2,42 5,14 43,17 160,17 53,75 0,30 39,80 8,72 54,42 3,95 2,99 sdb 137,54 5,48 9,23 0,20 587,07 22,73 129,35 0,07 7,70 7,51 16,18 2,17 2,04 Now I researched a little bit on how to find out what e2fsck is doing with all that processor time, and I found the tool strace, which gives me this: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo strace -p3704 lseek(4, 41026998272, SEEK_SET) = 41026998272 write(4, "\212\354K[_\361\3nl\212\245\352\255jR\303\354\312Yv\334p\253r\217\265\3567\325\257\3766"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404766720, SEEK_SET) = 48404766720 read(4, "\7t\260\366\346\337\304\210\33\267j\35\377'\31f\372\252\ffU\317.y\211\360\36\240c\30`\34"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 41027002368, SEEK_SET) = 41027002368 write(4, "\232]7Ws\321\352\t\1@[+5\263\334\276{\343zZx\352\21\316`1\271[\202\350R`"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404770816, SEEK_SET) = 48404770816 read(4, "\17\362r\230\327\25\346//\210H\v\311\3237\323K\304\306\361a\223\311\324\272?\213\tq \370\24"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 41027006464, SEEK_SET) = 41027006464 write(4, "\367yy>x\216?=\324Z\305\351\376&\25\244\210\271\22\306}\276\237\370(\214\205G\262\360\257#"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404774912, SEEK_SET) = 48404774912 read(4, "\365\25\0\21|T\0\21}3t_\272\373\222k\r\177\303\1\201\261\221$\261B\232\3142\21U\316"..., 4096) = 4096 ^CProcess 3704 detached around 16 of these lines every second, so 4 read and 4 write operations every second, which I don't consider to be a lot.. And finally, my question: Will this process ever finish? If those numbers from fseek (48404774912) represent bytes, that would be something like 45 gigabytes, with this beeing a 3 terrabyte disk, which would give me 134 days to go, if the speed stays constant, and he scans the disk like this completly and only once. Do you have some advice for me? I have most of the data on that disk elsewhere, but I've put a lot of hours into sorting and merging it to this disk, so I would prefer to getting this disk up and running again, without formatting it anew. I don't think that the hardware is damaged since the disk is only a few months and since I can't see any I/O errors in the dmesg output. UPDATE: I just looked at the strace output again (2012-11-06_2300), now it looks like this: lseek(4, 1419860611072, SEEK_SET) = 1419860611072 read(4, "3#\f\2447\335\0\22A\355\374\276j\204'\207|\217V|\23\245[\7VP\251\242\276\207\317:"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018145792, SEEK_SET) = 43018145792 write(4, "]\206\231\342Y\204-2I\362\242\344\6R\205\361\324\177\265\317C\334V\324\260\334\275t=\10F."..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 1419860615168, SEEK_SET) = 1419860615168 read(4, "\262\305\314Y\367\37x\326\245\226\226\320N\333$s\34\204\311\222\7\315\236\336\300TK\337\264\236\211n"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018149888, SEEK_SET) = 43018149888 write(4, "\271\224m\311\224\25!I\376\16;\377\0\223H\25Yd\201Y\342\r\203\271\24eG<\202{\373V"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 1419860619264, SEEK_SET) = 1419860619264 read(4, ";d\360\177\n\346\253\210\222|\250\352T\335M\33\260\320\261\7g\222P\344H?t\240\20\2548\310"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018153984, SEEK_SET) = 43018153984 write(4, "\360\252j\317\310\251G\227\335{\214`\341\267\31Y\202\360\v\374\307oq\3063\217Z\223\313\36D\211"..., 4096) = 4096 So this number of the lseeks before the reads, like 1419860619264 are already a lot bigger, standing for 1.29 terabytes if the numbers are bytes, so it doesn't seem to be a linear progress on a big scale, maybe there are only some areas that need work, that have big gaps in between them. (times are in CET)

    Read the article

  • SQLS Timeouts - High Reads in Profiler

    - by lb01
    I've audited a SQLS2008 server with Profiler for one day.. the overhead didn't seem to trouble this new client my company has. They are using a legacy VB6 application as a front-end. They're experiencing timeouts once SQLS RAM usage is high. The server is currently running x64 sqls2008 on a VM with nearly 9 GB of RAM. SQL Server's 'max server memory option' is currently set to 6GB. I've put the results of the trace in a table and queried them using this query. SELECT TextData, ApplicationName, Reads FROM [TraceWednesday] WHERE textdata is not null and EventClass = 12 GROUP BY TextData, ApplicationName, Reads ORDER BY Reads DESC As I expected, some values are very high. Top Reads, in pages. 2504188 1965910 1445636 1252433 1239108 1210153 1088580 1072725 Am I correct in thinking that the top one (2504188 pages) is 20033504 KB, which then is roughly ~20'000 MB, 20GB? These queries are often executed and can take quite some time to run. Eventually RAM is used up because of the cache fattening, and timeouts occur once SQL cannot 'splash' pages in the buffer pool as much. Costs go up. Am I correct in my understanding? I've read that I should tune the associated T-SQL and create appropriate indices. Obviously cutting down the I/O would make SQL Server use less RAM. OR, maybe it might just slow down the process of chewing up the whole RAM. If a lot less pages are read, maybe it'll all run much better even when usage is high? (less time swapping, etc.) Currently, our only option is to restart SQL once a week when RAM usage is high, suddenly the timeouts disappear. SQL breathes again. I'm sure lots of DBAs have been in this situation.. I'm asking before I start digging out all of the bad T-SQL and put indices here and there, is there is something else I can do? Any advice except from what I know (not much yet..) Much appreciated. Leo.

    Read the article

  • Linux: find out what process is using all the RAM?

    - by Timur
    Before actually asking, just to be clear: yes, I know about disk cache, and no, it is not my case :) Sorry, for this preamble :) I'm using CentOS 5. Every application in the system is swapping heavily, and the system is very slow. When I do free -m, here is what I got: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 3952 3929 22 0 1 18 -/+ buffers/cache: 3909 42 Swap: 16383 46 16337 So, I actually have only 42 Mb to use! As far as I understand, -/+ buffers/cache actually doesn't count the disk cache, so I indeed only have 42 Mb, right? I thought, I might be wrong, so I tried to switch off the disk caching and it had no effect - the picture remained the same. So, I decided to find out who is using all my RAM, and I used top for that. But, apparently, it reports that no process is using my RAM. The only process in my top is MySQL, but it is using 0.1% of RAM and 400Mb of swap. Same picture when I try to run other services or applications - all go in swap, top shows that MEM is not used (0.1% maximum for any process). top - 15:09:00 up 2:09, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.16, 0.11 Tasks: 112 total, 1 running, 111 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 4046868k total, 4001368k used, 45500k free, 748k buffers Swap: 16777208k total, 68840k used, 16708368k free, 16632k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ SWAP COMMAND 3214 ntp 15 0 23412 5044 3916 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 17m ntpd 2319 root 5 -10 12648 4460 3184 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 8188 iscsid 2168 root RT 0 22120 3692 2848 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 17m multipathd 5113 mysql 18 0 474m 2356 856 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.11 472m mysqld 4106 root 34 19 251m 1944 1360 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.11 249m yum-updatesd 4109 root 15 0 90152 1904 1772 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.18 86m sshd 5175 root 15 0 90156 1896 1772 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 86m sshd Restart doesn't help, and, by they way is very slow, which I wouldn't normally expect on this machine (4 cores, 4Gb RAM, RAID1). So, with that - I'm pretty sure that this is not a disk cache, who is using the RAM, because normally it should have been reduced and let other processes to use RAM, rather then go to swap. So, finally, the question is - if someone has any ideas how to find out what process is actually using the memory so heavily?

    Read the article

  • SQLS Timeouts - High Reads in Profiler

    - by lb01
    Hi I've audited a SQLS2008 server with Profiler for one day.. the overhead didn't seem to trouble this new client my company has. They are using a legacy VB6 application as a front-end. They're experiencing timeouts once SQLS RAM usage is high. The server is currently running x64 sqls2008 on a VM with nearly 9 GB of RAM. SQL Server's 'max server memory option' is currently set to 6GB. I've put the results of the trace in a table and queried them using this query. SELECT TextData, ApplicationName, Reads FROM [TraceWednesday] WHERE textdata is not null and EventClass = 12 GROUP BY TextData, ApplicationName, Reads ORDER BY Reads DESC As I expected, some values are very high. Top Reads, in pages. 2504188 1965910 1445636 1252433 1239108 1210153 1088580 1072725 Am I correct in thinking that the top one (2504188 pages) is 20033504 KB, which then is roughly ~20'000 MB, 20GB? These queries are often executed and can take quite some time to run. Eventually RAM is used up because of the cache fattening, and timeouts occur once SQL cannot 'splash' pages in the buffer pool as much. Costs go up. Am I correct in my understanding? I've read that I should tune the associated T-SQL and create appropriate indices. Obviously cutting down the I/O would make SQL Server use less RAM. OR, maybe it might just slow down the process of chewing up the whole RAM. If a lot less pages are read, maybe it'll all run much better even when usage is high? (less time swapping, etc.) Currently, our only option is to restart SQL once a week when RAM usage is high, suddenly the timeouts disappear. SQL breathes again. I'm sure lots of DBAs have been in this situation.. I'm asking before I start digging out all of the bad T-SQL and put indices here and there, is there is something else I can do? Any advice except from what I know (not much yet..) Much appreciated. Leo.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211  | Next Page >