Search Results

Search found 29816 results on 1193 pages for 'select tag'.

Page 209/1193 | < Previous Page | 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216  | Next Page >

  • Join map and refer to its key/value in HQL

    - by alamar
    Suppose I have a map: <map name="externalIds" table="album_external_ids"> <key column="album_id" not-null="true"/> <map-key-many-to-many class="Major" column="major_id"/> <element column="external_id" type="string" not-null="true"/> </map> How do I make a HQL meaning "select entities where map key's id == :foo and map value == :bar"? I can join it using select album from Album album join album.externalIds ids But how would I then refer to ids' key and value? ids.key.id = :foo and ids.value = :bar doesn't work, and hibernate doc is silent on this topic. Naive approaches that didn't work: select album from Album album join album.externalIds externalId where index(externalId).id = :foo and externalId = :bar and select album from Album album join album.externalIds externalId join index(externalId) major where major.id = :foo and externalId = :bar

    Read the article

  • Add comma-separated value of grouped rows to existing query

    - by Peter Lang
    I've got a view for reports, that looks something like this: SELECT a.id, a.value1, a.value2, b.value1, /* (+50 more such columns)*/ FROM a JOIN b ON (b.id = a.b_id) JOIN c ON (c.id = b.c_id) LEFT JOIN d ON (d.id = b.d_id) LEFT JOIN e ON (e.id = d.e_id) /* (+10 more inner/left joins) */ It joins quite a few tables and returns lots of columns, but indexes are in place and performance is fine. Now I want to add another column to the result, showing comma-separated values ordered by value from table y outer joined via intersection table x if a.value3 IS NULL, else take a.value3 To comma-separate the grouped values I use Tom Kyte's stragg, could use COLLECT later. Pseudo-code for the SELECT would look like that: SELECT xx.id, COALESCE( a.value3, stragg( xx.val ) ) value3 FROM ( SELECT x.id, y.val FROM x WHERE x.a_id = a.id JOIN y ON ( y.id = x.y_id ) ORDER BY y.val ASC ) xx GROUP BY xx.id What is the best way to do it? Any tips?

    Read the article

  • Grails multiple databases

    - by srinath
    Hi, how can we write queries on 2 databases . I installed datasources plugin and domain classes are : class Organization { long id long company_id String name static mapping = { version false table 'organization_' id column : 'organizationId' company_id column : 'companyId' name column : 'name' } } class Assoc { Integer id Integer association_id Integer organization_id static mapping = { version false table 'assoc' id column : 'ASSOC_ID' association_id column : 'ASSOCIATION_ID' organization_id column : 'ORGANIZATION_ID' } } this is working : def org = Organization.list() def assoc = Assoc.list() and this is not working : def query = Organization.executeQuery("SELECT o.name as name, o.id FROM Organization o WHERE o.id IN (SELECT a.organization_id FROM Assoc a )") error : org.hibernate.hql.ast.QuerySyntaxException: Assoc is not mapped [SELECT o.name as name, o.id FROM org.com.domain.Organization o WHERE o.id IN (SELECT a.organization_id FROM AssocOrg a )] How can we connect with 2 databases using single query ? thanks in advance .

    Read the article

  • How to eager load sibling data using LINQ to SQL?

    - by Scott
    The goal is to issue the fewest queries to SQL Server using LINQ to SQL without using anonymous types. The return type for the method will need to be IList<Child1>. The relationships are as follows: Parent Child1 Child2 Grandchild1 Parent Child1 is a one-to-many relationship Child1 Grandchild1 is a one-to-n relationship (where n is zero to infinity) Parent Child2 is a one-to-n relationship (where n is zero to infinity) I am able to eager load the Parent, Child1 and Grandchild1 data resulting in one query to SQL Server. This query with load options eager loads all of the data, except the sibling data (Child2): DataLoadOptions loadOptions = new DataLoadOptions(); loadOptions.LoadWith<Child1>(o => o.GrandChild1List); loadOptions.LoadWith<Child1>(o => o.Parent); dataContext.LoadOptions = loadOptions; IQueryable<Child1> children = from child in dataContext.Child1 select child; I need to load the sibling data as well. One approach I have tried is splitting the query into two LINQ to SQL queries and merging the result sets together (not pretty), however upon accessing the sibling data it is lazy loaded anyway. Adding the sibling load option will issue a query to SQL Server for each Grandchild1 and Child2 record (which is exactly what I am trying to avoid): DataLoadOptions loadOptions = new DataLoadOptions(); loadOptions.LoadWith<Child1>(o => o.GrandChild1List); loadOptions.LoadWith<Child1>(o => o.Parent); loadOptions.LoadWith<Parent>(o => o.Child2List); dataContext.LoadOptions = loadOptions; IQueryable<Child1> children = from child in dataContext.Child1 select child; exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Child2] AS [t0] WHERE [t0].[ForeignKeyToParent] = @p0',N'@p0 int',@p0=1 exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Child2] AS [t0] WHERE [t0].[ForeignKeyToParent] = @p0',N'@p0 int',@p0=2 exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Child2] AS [t0] WHERE [t0].[ForeignKeyToParent] = @p0',N'@p0 int',@p0=3 exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Child2] AS [t0] WHERE [t0].[ForeignKeyToParent] = @p0',N'@p0 int',@p0=4 I've also written LINQ to SQL queries to join in all of the data in hopes that it would eager load the data, however when the LINQ to SQL EntitySet of Child2 or Grandchild1 are accessed it lazy loads the data. The reason for returning the IList<Child1> is to hydrate business objects. My thoughts are I am either: Approaching this problem the wrong way. Have the option of calling a stored procedure? My organization should not be using LINQ to SQL as an ORM? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you, -Scott

    Read the article

  • Error when calling Mysql Stored procedure

    - by devuser
    This is my stored procedure to search throgh all databases,tables and columns. This procedure got created with out any error. DELIMITER $$ DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS mydb.get_table$$ CREATE DEFINER=root@% PROCEDURE get_table(in_search varchar(50)) READS SQL DATA BEGIN DECLARE trunc_cmd VARCHAR(50); DECLARE search_string VARCHAR(250); DECLARE db,tbl,clmn CHAR(50); DECLARE done INT DEFAULT 0; DECLARE COUNTER INT; DECLARE table_cur CURSOR FOR SELECT concat('SELECT COUNT(*) INTO @CNT_VALUE FROM ', table_schema,'.', table_name, ' WHERE ', column_name,' REGEXP ''',in_search,'''' ) ,table_schema,table_name,column_name FROM information_schema.COLUMNS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA NOT IN ('mydb','information_schema'); DECLARE CONTINUE HANDLER FOR NOT FOUND SET done=1; #Truncating table for refill the data for new search. PREPARE trunc_cmd FROM 'TRUNCATE TABLE temp_details'; EXECUTE trunc_cmd ; OPEN table_cur; table_loop:LOOP FETCH table_cur INTO search_string,db,tbl,clmn; #Executing the search SET @search_string = search_string; SELECT search_string; PREPARE search_string FROM @search_string; EXECUTE search_string; SET COUNTER = @CNT_VALUE; SELECT COUNTER; IF COUNTER0 THEN # Inserting required results from search to table INSERT INTO temp_details VALUES(db,tbl,clmn); END IF; IF done=1 THEN LEAVE table_loop; END IF; END LOOP; CLOSE table_cur; #Finally Show Results SELECT * FROM temp_details; END$$ DELIMITER ; But when calling this procedure following error occurs. call get_table('aaa') Error Code : 1064 You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'delete REGEXP 'aaa'' at line 1 (0 ms taken)

    Read the article

  • Linq to SQL and SQL Server Compact Error: "There was an error parsing the query."

    - by Jeremy
    I created a SQL server compact database (MyDatabase.sdf), and populated it with some data. I then ran SQLMetal.exe and generated a linq to sql class (MyDatabase.mdf) Now I'm trying to select all records from a table with a relatively straightforward select, and I get the error: "There was an error parsing the query. [ Token line number = 3,Token line offset = 67,Token in error = MAX]" Here is my select code: public IEnumerable ListItems() { MyDatabase db_m = new MyDatabase("c:\mydatabase.sdf"); return this.db_m.TestTable.Select(test = new Item() { .... } } I've read that Linq to SQL works with Sql Compact, is there some other configuration I need to do?

    Read the article

  • Inner Join with more than a field

    - by Leandro
    Precise to do a select with inner join that has relationship in more than a field among the tables Exemple: DataSet dt = new Select().From(SubConta.Schema) .InnerJoin(PlanoContabilSubConta.EmpSubContaColumn, SubConta.CodEmpColumn) .InnerJoin(PlanoContabilSubConta.FilSubContaColumn, SubConta.CodFilColumn) .InnerJoin(PlanoContabilSubConta.SubContaColumn, SubConta.TradutorColumn) .Where(PlanoContabilSubConta.Columns.EmpContabil).IsEqualTo(cEmp) .And(PlanoContabilSubConta.Columns.FilContabil).IsEqualTo(cFil) .And(PlanoContabilSubConta.Columns.Conta).IsEqualTo(cTrad) .ExecuteDataSet(); But the generated sql is wrong: exec sp_executesql N'/* GetDataSet() */ SELECT [dbo].[SubContas].[CodEmp], [dbo].[SubContas].[CodFil], [dbo].[SubContas].[Tradutor], [dbo].[SubContas].[Descricao], [dbo].[SubContas].[Inativa], [dbo].[SubContas].[DataImplantacao] FROM [dbo].[SubContas] INNER JOIN [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas] ON [dbo].[SubContas].[CodEmp] = [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas].[EmpSubConta] INNER JOIN [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas] ON [dbo].[SubContas].[CodFil] = [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas].[FilSubConta] INNER JOIN [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas] ON [dbo].[SubContas].[Tradutor] = [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas].[SubConta] WHERE EmpContabil = @EmpContabil0 AND FilContabil = @FilContabil1 AND Conta = @Conta2 ',N'@EmpContabil0 varchar(1),@FilContabil1 varchar(1),@Conta2 varchar(1)',@EmpContabil0='1',@FilContabil1='1',@Conta2='1' What should be made to generate this sql? exec sp_executesql N'/* GetDataSet() */ SELECT [dbo].[SubContas].[CodEmp], [dbo].[SubContas].[CodFil], [dbo].[SubContas].[Tradutor], [dbo].[SubContas].[Descricao], [dbo].[SubContas].[Inativa], [dbo].[SubContas].[DataImplantacao] FROM [dbo].[SubContas] INNER JOIN [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas] ON [dbo].[SubContas].[CodEmp] = [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas].[EmpSubConta] AND [dbo].[SubContas].[CodFil] = [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas].[FilSubConta] AND [dbo].[SubContas].[Tradutor] = [dbo].[PlanoContabilSubContas].[SubConta] WHERE EmpContabil = @EmpContabil0 AND FilContabil = @FilContabil1 AND Conta = @Conta2 ',N'@EmpContabil0 varchar(1),@FilContabil1 varchar(1),@Conta2 varchar(1)',@EmpContabil0='1',@FilContabil1='1',@Conta2='1'

    Read the article

  • How to fill DataGridView from nested table oracle

    - by arkadiusz85
    I want to create my type: CREATE TYPE t_read AS OBJECT ( id_worker NUMBER(20), how_much NUMBER(5,2), adddate_r DATE, date_from DATE, date_to DATE ); I create a table of my type: CREATE TYPE t_tab_read AS TABLE OF t_read; Next step is create a table with my type: enter code hereCREATE TABLE Reading ( id_watermeter NUMBER(20) constraint Watermeter_fk1 references Watermeters(id_watermeter), read t_tab_read ) NESTED TABLE read STORE AS store_read ; Microsoft Visual Studio can not display this type in DataGridView. I use Oracle.Command: C# using Oracle.DataAccess; using Oracle.DataAccess.Client; private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { //my working class to connect to database ConnectionClass.BeginConnection(); OracleDataAdapter tmp = new OracleDataAdapter(); tmp = ConnectionClass.ReadCommand(ReadClass.test()); DataSet dataset4 = new DataSet(); tmp.Fill(dataset4, "Read1"); dataGridView4.DataSource = dataset4.Tables["Read1"]; } catch (Exception o) { MessageBox.Show(o.Message); } public class ReadClass { public static OracleCommand test() { string sql = "select c.id_watermeter, a. from reading c , table (c.read) a where id_watermeter=1"; ConnectionClass.Command1= new OracleCommand(sql, ConnectionClass.Connection); ConnectionClass.Command1.CommandType = CommandType.Text; return ConnectionClass.Command1; } } I tray: string sql = "select r.id_watermeter, o.id_worker, o.how_much, o.adddate_r, o.date_from, o.date_to from reading r, table (r.read) o where r.id_watermeter=1" string sql = "select a.from reading c , Table (c.read) a where id_watermeter=1" string sql = "select a.id_worker, a.how_much, a.adddate_r, a.date_from, a.date_to from reading c , table (c.read) a where id_watermeter=1" string sql = "select c.id_watermeter, a. from reading c , table (c.read) a where id_watermeter=1" Error : Unsuported Oracle data type USERDEFINED encountered Sombady can help me how to fill DataGridView using data from nested table. I am using Oracle 10g XE

    Read the article

  • C# LINQ to SQL Except Operator

    - by kb
    Hi i have a list of event Ids that i want to be excluded from my select statement, but no sure how to implement this: this is what stores my list of event Ids List<int> ExcludedEvents; and this is my select statement (from an XML feed) var allEvents = from eventsList in xmlDoc.Elements("shows").Elements("Show") select new EventFeed() { EventName = eventsList.Attribute("Name").Value, EventSummary = eventsList.Attribute("ShortDesc").Value, EventDetails = eventsList.Attribute("LongDesc").Value, EventShowCode = eventsList.Attribute("Code").Value }; i want to select all events except for the events that have their eventId matching the EventShowCode value i have looked at the except operator, but not sure how to implement it thanks

    Read the article

  • How to copy the shipping address to billing address

    - by Jerry
    Hi all I like to know if I can copy the shipping address to billing address. I got most of the parts done but I am not sure how to copy select menu (states) value to billing address. I really appreciate any helps. My code $(document).ready(function(){ Jquery $('#same').click(function(){ if($('#same').attr('checked')){ $('#bfName').val($('#fName').val()); $('#blName').val($('#lName').val()); $('#baddress1').val($('#address1').val()); $('#baddress2').val($('#address2').val()); $('#bcity').val($('#city').val()); alert(($('#state option:selected').val())); //not sure what to do here $('#bzip').val($('#zip').val()); }; }); Html <td><select name="state"> //shipping states......only partial codes. <option value="">None <option value="AL">Alabama <option value="AK">Alaska <option value="AZ">Arizona <option value="AR">Arkansas <option value="CA">California <option value="CO">Colorado <option value="CT">Connecticut </select></td> <td><select name="bstate"> //billing state................only partial codes. <option value="">None <option value="AL">Alabama <option value="AK">Alaska <option value="AZ">Arizona <option value="AR">Arkansas <option value="CA">California <option value="CO">Colorado <option value="CT">Connecticut </select></td> Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • Nested queries in Arel

    - by Schrockwell
    I am attempting to nest SELECT queries in Arel and/or Active Record in Rails 3 to generate the following SQL statement. SELECT sorted.* FROM (SELECT * FROM points ORDER BY points.timestamp DESC) AS sorted GROUP BY sorted.client_id An alias for the subquery can be created by doing points = Table(:points) sorted = points.order('timestamp DESC').alias but then I'm stuck as how to pass it into the parent query (short of calling #to_sql, which sounds pretty ugly). How do you use a SELECT statement as a sub-query in Arel (or Active Record) to accomplish the above? Maybe there's an altogether different way to accomplish this query that doesn't use nested queries?

    Read the article

  • iBatis get executed sql

    - by qaxi
    Hi all. Is there any way where I can get the executed query of iBatis? I want to reuse the query for an UNION query. For example: <sqlMap namespace="userSQLMap"> <select id="getUser" resultClass="UserPackage.User"> SELECT username, password FROM table WHERE id=#value# </select> </sqlMap> And when I execute the query through int id = 1 List<User> userList = queryDAO.executeForObjectList("userSQLMap.getUser",id) I want to get SELECT username, password FROM table WHERE id=1 Is there any way I could get the query? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • To call SelectMany dynamically in the way of System.Linq.Dynamic

    - by user341127
    In System.Linq.Dynamic, there are a few methods to form Select, Where and other Linq statements dynamically. But there is no for SelectMany. The method for Select is as the following: public static IQueryable Select(this IQueryable source, string selector, params object[] values) { if (source == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("source"); if (selector == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("selector"); LambdaExpression lambda = DynamicExpression.ParseLambda(source.ElementType, null, selector, values); IQueryable result = source.Provider.CreateQuery( Expression.Call( typeof(Queryable), "Select", new Type[] { source.ElementType, lambda.Body.Type }, source.Expression, Expression.Quote(lambda))); return result; } I tried to modify the above code, after hours working, I couldn't find a way out. Any suggestions are welcome. Ying

    Read the article

  • Selenium onChange not working

    - by tohop
    Hi, I have tried a number of things to try and get Selenium to pick up an 'onchange' event from a drop down menu, none of which has worked. The offending HTML is: <select onchange="doOpperation(this.options[this.selectedIndex]); this.selectedIndex = 0;" name="opps_ondemand" id="opps_ondemand"> <option value="none" id="ondemand">Mark as...</option> <option cmd="blah1" value="add">Something</option> <option cmd="blah2" value="remove">None</option> </select> I have read that Selenium IDE doesn't record some on* events, and so it would be wise to use fireEvent(): $this->click("opps_ondemand"); $this->select("opps_ondemand", "label=Mark as..."); $this->click("//option[@value='add']"); sleep(3); $this->fireEvent("//select[@id='opps_ondemand']", "change"); However, this does not work (with or without the fireEvent). I have also tried using $this->fireEvent("locator", "click"); instead of $this->click("locator"); but this did nothing. Selenium does not complain about these locators not existing so I am assuming it can see the select/option elements fine. The problem seems to be the onChange event. Does anyone know how to resolve this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Looking for an HQL builder (Hibernate Query Language)

    - by Sébastien RoccaSerra
    I'm looking for a builder for HQL in Java. I want to get rid of things like: StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder() .append("select stock from ") .append( Stock.class.getName() ) .append( " as stock where stock.id = ") .append( id ); I'd rather have something like: HqlBuilder builder = new HqlBuilder() .select( "stock" ) .from( Stock.class.getName() ).as( "stock" ) .where( "stock.id" ).equals( id ); I googled a bit, and I couldn't find one. I wrote a quick & dumb HqlBuilder that suits my needs for now, but I'd love to find one that has more users and tests than me alone. Note: I'd like to be able to do things like this and more, which I failed to do with the Criteria API: select stock from com.something.Stock as stock, com.something.Bonus as bonus where stock.someValue = bonus.id ie. select all stocks whose property someValue points to any bonus from the Bonus table. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • upgrading to worpdress 3.5 erased all posts and pages, wiped database

    - by James
    So I have upgraded to wordpress 3.5 and that seemed to have erased all posts and custom post types, media images, sliders etc' I have made a backup using both pressbackup and backupbuddy but when I try to restore the database (or everything). when it is done, if I look at the front end, everything is back and looks great but then when I go to the back end it says the database needs to be upgraded and doesn't let me bypass that. if i click ok it prompts the following message and after that everything is wiped again: WordPress database error: [Table 'db446353270.wp_categories' doesn't exist] SELECT * FROM wp_categories ORDER BY cat_ID WordPress database error: [Table 'db446353270.wp_post2cat' doesn't exist] SELECT post_id, category_id FROM wp_post2cat GROUP BY post_id, category_id WordPress database error: [Table 'db446353270.wp_linkcategories' doesn't exist] SELECT cat_id, cat_name FROM wp_linkcategories WordPress database error: [Unknown column 'link_category' in 'field list'] SELECT link_id, link_category FROM wp_links please advise. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Selecting element by data attribute

    - by zizo
    Is there an easy and straight-forward method to select elements based on their data attribute? For example, select all anchors that has data attribute named customerID which has value of 22. I am kind of hesitant to use rel or other attributes to store such information, but I find it much harder to select an element based on what data is stored in it. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Can a WPF ComboBox display alternative text when its selection is null?

    - by Garth T Kidd
    G'day! I want my WPF ComboBox to display some alternative text when its data-bound selection is null. The view model has the expected properties: public ThingoSelectionViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged { public ThingoSelectionViewModel(IProvideThingos) { this.Thingos = IProvideThingos.GetThingos(); } public ObservableCollection<Thingo> Thingos { get; set; } public Thingo SelectedThingo { get { return this.selectedThingo; } set { // set this.selectedThingo and raise the property change notification } // ... } The view has XAML binding to the view model in the expected way: <ComboBox x:Name="ComboboxDrive" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=SelectedThingo}" IsEditable="false" HorizontalAlignment="Left" MinWidth="100" IsReadOnly="false" Style="{StaticResource ComboboxStyle}" Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="1" Margin="5" SelectedIndex="0"> <ComboBox.ItemsSource> <CompositeCollection> <ComboBoxItem IsEnabled="False">Select a thingo</ComboBoxItem> <CollectionContainer Collection="{Binding Source={StaticResource Thingos}}" /> </CompositeCollection> </ComboBox.ItemsSource> </ComboBox> The ComboBoxItem wedged into the top is a way to get an extra item at the top. It's pure chrome: the view model stays pure and simple. There's just one problem: the users want "Select a thingo" displayed whenever the ComboBox' selection is null. The users do not want a thingo selected by default. They want to see a message telling them to select a thingo. I'd like to avoid having to pollute the viewmodel with a ThingoWrapper class with a ToString method returning "Select a thingo" if its .ActualThingo property is null, wrapping each Thingo as I populate Thingos, and figuring out some way to prevent the user from selecting the nulled Thingo. Is there a way to display "Select a thingo" within the ComboBox' boundaries using pure XAML, or pure XAML and a few lines of code in the view's code-behind class?

    Read the article

  • mysql true row merge... not just a union

    - by panofish
    What is the mysql I need to achieve the result below given these 2 tables: table1: +----+-------+ | id | name | +----+-------+ | 1 | alan | | 2 | bob | | 3 | dave | +----+-------+ table2: +----+---------+ | id | state | +----+---------+ | 2 | MI | | 3 | WV | | 4 | FL | +----+---------+ I want to create a temporary view that looks like this desired result: +----+---------+---------+ | id | name | state | +----+---------+---------+ | 1 | alan | | | 2 | bob | MI | | 3 | dave | WV | | 4 | | FL | +----+---------+---------+ I tried a mysql union but the following result is not what I want. create view table3 as (select id,name,"" as state from table1) union (select id,"" as name,state from table2) table3 union result: +----+---------+---------+ | id | name | state | +----+---------+---------+ | 1 | alan | | | 2 | bob | | | 3 | dave | | | 2 | | MI | | 3 | | WV | | 4 | | FL | +----+---------+---------+ First suggestion results: SELECT * FROM table1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 USING (id) UNION SELECT * FROM table1 RIGHT OUTER JOIN table2 USING (id) +----+---------+---------+ | id | name | state | +----+---------+---------+ | 1 | alan | | | 2 | bob | MI | | 3 | dave | WV | | 2 | MI | bob | | 3 | WV | dave | | 4 | FL | | +----+---------+---------+

    Read the article

  • Views performance in MySQL for denormalization

    - by Gianluca Bargelli
    I am currently writing my truly first PHP Application and i would like to know how to project/design/implement MySQL Views properly; In my particular case User data is spread across several tables (as a consequence of Database Normalization) and i was thinking to use a View to group data into one large table: CREATE VIEW `Users_Merged` ( name, surname, email, phone, role ) AS ( SELECT name, surname, email, phone, 'Customer' FROM `Customer` ) UNION ( SELECT name, surname, email, tel, 'Admin' FROM `Administrator` ) UNION ( SELECT name, surname, email, tel, 'Manager' FROM `manager` ); This way i can use the View's data from the PHP app easily but i don't really know how much this can affect performance. For example: SELECT * from `Users_Merged` WHERE role = 'Admin'; Is the right way to filter view's data or should i filter BEFORE creating the view itself? (I need this to have a list of users and the functionality to filter them by role). EDIT Specifically what i'm trying to obtain is Denormalization of three tables into one. Is my solution correct? See Denormalization on wikipedia

    Read the article

  • Set query FROM table using report parameter in BIRT

    - by Adam
    Hi, I am using the BIRT report writer, and I have multiple tables with the same data structure. In my report design, I want to select the table my query uses as a report parameter (as part of a mysql query in the data set) -- but I can't figure it out. When I create the data set, it's great that I can use parameters in the form of SELECT * FROM WHERE ?, and set these to report parameters, but I get an error if I set the ? to the table, such as: SELECT * FROM ? WHERE 1 Is there another way I can do this? As it's java, I assume the syntax follows that of a PreparedStatement. In BIRT 2.5 there is a property binding option under the data set dialog... and I've tried setting my query as: "SELECT * FROM "+params["DataTable"].value+" WHERE 1", but that was also results in an error.

    Read the article

  • TSQL -- Make it better

    - by user319353
    Hi: -- Very Narrow (all IDs are passed in) IF(@EmpID IS NOT NULL AND @DeptID IS NOT NULL AND @CityID IS NOT NULL) BEGIN SELECT e.EmpName ,d.DeptName ,c.CityName FROM Employee e WITH (NOLOCK) JOIN Department d WITH (NOLOCK) ON e.deptid = d.deptid JOIN City c WITH (NOLOCK) ON e.CityID = c.CityID WHERE e.EmpID = @EmpID END -- Just 2 IDs passed in ELSE IF(@DeptID IS NOT NULL AND @CityID IS NOT NULL) BEGIN SELECT e.EmpName ,d.DeptName ,NULL AS [CityName] FROM Employee e WITH (NOLOCK) JOIN Department d WITH (NOLOCK) ON e.deptid = d.deptid JOIN City c WITH (NOLOCK) ON e.CityID = c.CityID WHERE d.deptID = @DeptID END -- Very Broad (just 1 ID passed in) ELSE IF(@CityID IS NOT NULL) BEGIN SELECT e.EmpName ,NULL AS [DeptName] ,NULL AS [CityName] FROM Employee e WITH (NOLOCK) JOIN Department d WITH (NOLOCK) ON e.deptid = d.deptid JOIN City c WITH (NOLOCK) ON e.CityID = c.CityID WHERE c.CityID = @CityID END -- None (Nothing passed in) ELSE BEGIN SELECT NULL AS [EmpName] ,NULL AS [DeptName] ,NULL AS [CityName] END Question: Is there any better way (OR specifically can I do anything without IF...ELSE condition?

    Read the article

  • T-SQL - Left Outer Joins - Filters in the where clause versus the on clause.

    - by Greg Potter
    I am trying to compare two tables to find rows in each table that is not in the other. Table 1 has a groupby column to create 2 sets of data within table one. groupby number ----------- ----------- 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 4 Table 2 has only one column. number ----------- 1 3 4 So Table 1 has the values 1,2,4 in group 2 and Table 2 has the values 1,3,4. I expect the following result when joining for Group 2: `Table 1 LEFT OUTER Join Table 2` T1_Groupby T1_Number T2_Number ----------- ----------- ----------- 2 2 NULL `Table 2 LEFT OUTER Join Table 1` T1_Groupby T1_Number T2_Number ----------- ----------- ----------- NULL NULL 3 The only way I can get this to work is if I put a where clause for the first join: PRINT 'Table 1 LEFT OUTER Join Table 2, with WHERE clause' select table1.groupby as [T1_Groupby], table1.number as [T1_Number], table2.number as [T2_Number] from table1 LEFT OUTER join table2 --****************************** on table1.number = table2.number --****************************** WHERE table1.groupby = 2 AND table2.number IS NULL and a filter in the ON for the second: PRINT 'Table 2 LEFT OUTER Join Table 1, with ON clause' select table1.groupby as [T1_Groupby], table1.number as [T1_Number], table2.number as [T2_Number] from table2 LEFT OUTER join table1 --****************************** on table2.number = table1.number AND table1.groupby = 2 --****************************** WHERE table1.number IS NULL Can anyone come up with a way of not using the filter in the on clause but in the where clause? The context of this is I have a staging area in a database and I want to identify new records and records that have been deleted. The groupby field is the equivalent of a batchid for an extract and I am comparing the latest extract in a temp table to a the batch from yesterday stored in a partioneds table, which also has all the previously extracted batches as well. Code to create table 1 and 2: create table table1 (number int, groupby int) create table table2 (number int) insert into table1 (number, groupby) values (1, 1) insert into table1 (number, groupby) values (2, 1) insert into table1 (number, groupby) values (1, 2) insert into table2 (number) values (1) insert into table1 (number, groupby) values (2, 2) insert into table2 (number) values (3) insert into table1 (number, groupby) values (4, 2) insert into table2 (number) values (4) EDIT: A bit more context - depending on where I put the filter I different results. As stated above the where clause gives me the correct result in one state and the ON in the other. I am looking for a consistent way of doing this. Where - select table1.groupby as [T1_Groupby], table1.number as [T1_Number], table2.number as [T2_Number] from table1 LEFT OUTER join table2 --****************************** on table1.number = table2.number --****************************** WHERE table1.groupby = 2 AND table2.number IS NULL Result: T1_Groupby T1_Number T2_Number ----------- ----------- ----------- 2 2 NULL On - select table1.groupby as [T1_Groupby], table1.number as [T1_Number], table2.number as [T2_Number] from table1 LEFT OUTER join table2 --****************************** on table1.number = table2.number AND table1.groupby = 2 --****************************** WHERE table2.number IS NULL Result: T1_Groupby T1_Number T2_Number ----------- ----------- ----------- 1 1 NULL 2 2 NULL 1 2 NULL Where (table 2 this time) - select table1.groupby as [T1_Groupby], table1.number as [T1_Number], table2.number as [T2_Number] from table2 LEFT OUTER join table1 --****************************** on table2.number = table1.number AND table1.groupby = 2 --****************************** WHERE table1.number IS NULL Result: T1_Groupby T1_Number T2_Number ----------- ----------- ----------- NULL NULL 3 On - select table1.groupby as [T1_Groupby], table1.number as [T1_Number], table2.number as [T2_Number] from table2 LEFT OUTER join table1 --****************************** on table2.number = table1.number --****************************** WHERE table1.number IS NULL AND table1.groupby = 2 Result: T1_Groupby T1_Number T2_Number ----------- ----------- ----------- (0) rows returned

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216  | Next Page >