Search Results

Search found 34765 results on 1391 pages for 'alias method chain'.

Page 21/1391 | < Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >

  • Static and Non Static Method Intercall in Java

    - by Vishal
    I am clearing my concepts on Java. My knowledge about Java is on far begineer side, so kindly bear with me. I am trying to understand static method and non static method intercalls. I know -- Static method can call another static method simply by its name within same class. Static method can call another non staic method of same class only after creating instance of the class. Non static method can call another static method of same class simply by way of classname.methodname - No sure if this correct ? My Question is about non static method call to another non staic method of same class. In class declaration, when we declare all methods, can we call another non static method of same class from a non static class ? Please explain with example. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • PowerShell - Set Alias for Loaded Assembly

    - by Uros Calakovic
    I use this code to load a .Net assembly to PowerShell: [System.Reflection.Assembly]::Load("System.Windows.Forms, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089") | out-null [System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox]::Show("Hello world") Can I set an alias for an assembly (for example 'System.Windows.Forms' = 'Forms') so that I don't have to type the assembly full name when calling static methods like MessageBox.Show()?

    Read the article

  • Alias for EditorAttribute

    - by Johan
    Is there a way to create a shorter alias for an EditorAttribute? Instead of: [EditorAttribute(typeof<ColorPickerDialogPropertyValueEditor>, typeof<DialogPropertyValueEditor>)] public Color4 Color { get; set; } I would like to write: using ColorPicker = EditorAttribute(typeof<ColorPickerDialogPropertyValueEditor>, typeof<DialogPropertyValueEditor>) [ColorPicker] public Color4 Color { get; set; } Unfortunately the EditorAttribute class is sealed so I cannot inherit it.

    Read the article

  • SQL Alias as Table.column

    - by bakerjr
    hi, is it possible to alias an aggregate function in a select clause as AliasTable.AliasColumn? The reason is because I want minimum modifications in my arrays (I'm using PHP). Thanks! P.S. I'm using SQl Server 2008

    Read the article

  • Error in creating alias in formula tag

    - by Senthilnathan
    Hi all I have a sql query in formula tag inside property tag. In that query i am creating alias name but the hibernate appends table name and throwing me error. select sum(e.salary) as sal from employee e but hibernate changes to select sum(e.salary) as employee.sal from employee e how to avoid this .... it should recognise as sal inside of employee.sal !!!

    Read the article

  • How to call implemented method of generic enum in Java?

    - by Justin Wiseman
    I am trying pass an enum into a method, iterate over that enums values, and call the method that that enum implements on all of those values. I am getting compiler errors on the part "value.getAlias()". It says "The method getAlias() is undefined for the type E" I have attempted to indicate that E implements the HasAlias interface, but it does not seem to work. Is this possible, and if so, how do I fix the code below to do what I want? The code below is only meant to show my process, it is not my intention to just print the names of the values in an enum, but to demonstate my problem. public interface HasAlias{ String getAlias(); }; public enum Letters implements HasAlias { A("The letter A"), B("The letter B"); private final String alias; public String getAlias(){return alias;} public Letters(String alias) { this.alias = alias; } } public enum Numbers implements HasAlias { ONE("The number one"), TWO("The number two"); private final String alias; public String getAlias(){return alias;} public Letters(String alias) { this.alias = alias; } } public class Identifier { public <E extends Enum<? extends HasAlias>> void identify(Class<E> enumClass) { for(E value : enumClass.getEnumConstants()) { System.out.println(value.getAlias()); } } }

    Read the article

  • jQuery jqXHR - cancel chained calls, trigger error chain

    - by m0sa
    I am creating a ajax utility for interfacing with my server methods. I would like to leverage jQuery 1.5+ deferred methods from the object returned from the jQuery.ajax() call. The situation is following. The serverside method always returns a JSON object: { success: true|false, data: ... } The client-side utility initiates the ajax call like this var jqxhr = $.ajax({ ... }); And the problem area: jqxhr.success(function(data, textStatus, xhr) { if(!data || !data.success) { ???? // abort processing, trigger error } }); return jqxhr; // return to caller so he can attach his own handlers So the question is how to cancel invocation of all the callers appended success callbacks an trigger his error handler in the place mentioned with ???? ? The documentation says the deferred function invocation lists are FIFO, so my success handler is definitely the first one.

    Read the article

  • Alias for a C++ template?

    - by porgarmingduod
    typedef boost::interprocess::managed_shared_memory::segment_manager segment_manager_t; // Works fine, segment_manager is a class typedef boost::interprocess::adaptive_pool allocator_t; // Can't do this, adaptive_pool is a template The idea is that if I want to switch between boost interprocess' several different options for shared memory and allocators, I just modify the typedefs. Unfortunately the allocators are templates, so I can't typedef the allocator I want to use. Is there a way to achieve an alias to a template in C++? (Except for the obvious #define ALLOCATOR_T boost::interprocess::adaptive_pool)

    Read the article

  • PHP alias @ function

    - by SyaZ
    I'm new to PHP and I'm confused seeing some examples calling a function with a @ prefix like @mysql_ping(). What is it for? Googling / searching is not much of a help since @ gets discarded and 'alias' is not good enough keyword.

    Read the article

  • Combining template method with strategy

    - by Mekswoll
    An assignment in my software engineering class is to design an application which can play different forms a particular game. The game in question is Mancala, some of these games are called Wari or Kalah. These games differ in some aspects but for my question it's only important to know that the games could differ in the following: The way in which the result of a move is handled The way in which the end of the game is determined The way in which the winner is determined The first thing that came to my mind to design this was to use the strategy pattern, I have a variation in algorithms (the actual rules of the game). The design could look like this: I then thought to myself that in the game of Mancala and Wari the way the winner is determined is exactly the same and the code would be duplicated. I don't think this is by definition a violation of the 'one rule, one place' or DRY principle seeing as a change in rules for Mancala wouldn't automatically mean that rule should be changed in Wari as well. Nevertheless from the feedback I got from my professor I got the impression to find a different design. I then came up with this: Each game (Mancala, Wari, Kalah, ...) would just have attribute of the type of each rule's interface, i.e. WinnerDeterminer and if there's a Mancala 2.0 version which is the same as Mancala 1.0 except for how the winner is determined it can just use the Mancala versions. I think the implementation of these rules as a strategy pattern is certainly valid. But the real problem comes when I want to design it further. In reading about the template method pattern I immediately thought it could be applied to this problem. The actions that are done when a user makes a move are always the same, and in the same order, namely: deposit stones in holes (this is the same for all games, so would be implemented in the template method itself) determine the result of the move determine if the game has finished because of the previous move if the game has finished, determine who has won Those three last steps are all in my strategy pattern described above. I'm having a lot of trouble combining these two. One possible solution I found would be to abandon the strategy pattern and do the following: I don't really see the design difference between the strategy pattern and this? But I am certain I need to use a template method (although I was just as sure about having to use a strategy pattern). I also can't determine who would be responsible for creating the TurnTemplate object, whereas with the strategy pattern I feel I have families of objects (the three rules) which I could easily create using an abstract factory pattern. I would then have a MancalaRuleFactory, WariRuleFactory, etc. and they would create the correct instances of the rules and hand me back a RuleSet object. Let's say that I use the strategy + abstract factory pattern and I have a RuleSet object which has algorithms for the three rules in it. The only way I feel I can still use the template method pattern with this is to pass this RuleSet object to my TurnTemplate. The 'problem' that then surfaces is that I would never need my concrete implementations of the TurnTemplate, these classes would become obsolete. In my protected methods in the TurnTemplate I could just call ruleSet.determineWinner(). As a consequence, the TurnTemplate class would no longer be abstract but would have to become concrete, is it then still a template method pattern? To summarize, am I thinking in the right way or am I missing something easy? If I'm on the right track, how do I combine a strategy pattern and a template method pattern? This is part of a homework assignment but I'm not looking to be gifted the answer, I have deliberately been very verbose in my question to show that I have thought about it before coming here to ask a question

    Read the article

  • Passing Parameters to an ADF Page through the URL - Part 2.

    - by shay.shmeltzer
    I showed before how to pass a parameter on the URL when invoking a taskflow (where the taskflow starts with a method call and then a page). However in some simpler scenarios you don't actually need a full blown taskflow. Instead you can use page level parameters defined for your page in the adfc-config.xml file. So below is a demo of this technique. I'm also taking advantage of this video to show the concept of a view object level service method and how to invoke it from your page. P.S. You might wonder - why not just reference #{param.amount} as the value set for the method parameter? Why do I need to copy it into a viewScope parameter? The advantage of placing the value in the viewScope is that it is available even when the page went through several sumbits. For example if you switch the "partialSumbit" property of the "Next" button to false in the above example - the minute that you press the button to go to the next department - the param.amount value is gone. However the ViewScope is still there as long as you stay on this page.

    Read the article

  • Is it OK to introduce methods that are used only during unit tests?

    - by Mchl
    Recently I was TDDing a factory method. The method was to create either a plain object, or an object wrapped in a decorator. The decorated object could be of one of several types all extending StrategyClass. In my test I wanted to check, if the class of returned object is as expected. That's easy when plain object os returned, but what to do when it's wrapped within a decorator? I code in PHP so I could use ext/Reflection to find out a class of wrapped object, but it seemed to me to be overcomplicating things, and somewhat agains rules of TDD. Instead I decided to introduce getClassName() that would return object's class name when called from StrategyClass. When called from the decorator however, it would return the value returned by the same method in decorated object. Some code to make it more clear: interface StrategyInterface { public function getClassName(); } abstract class StrategyClass implements StrategyInterface { public function getClassName() { return \get_class($this); } } abstract class StrategyDecorator implements StrategyInterface { private $decorated; public function __construct(StrategyClass $decorated) { $this->decorated = $decorated; } public function getClassName() { return $this->decorated->getClassName(); } } And a PHPUnit test /** * @dataProvider providerForTestGetStrategy * @param array $arguments * @param string $expected */ public function testGetStrategy($arguments, $expected) { $this->assertEquals( __NAMESPACE__.'\\'.$expected, $this->object->getStrategy($arguments)->getClassName() ) } //below there's another test to check if proper decorator is being used My point here is: is it OK to introduce such methods, that have no other use than to make unit tests easier? Somehow it doesn't feel right to me.

    Read the article

  • Global Import Aliasing in .NET

    - by Josh Stodola
    Using import aliasing in a single class, we can reference class library namespaces by assigning our own custom alias like this: Imports Db = Company.Lib.Data.Objects And then we are able to reference the classes inside of Company.Lib.Data.Objects by using the Db alias that we assigned. Is it possible to do this at the global level so that the alias is applied to the entire solution instead of the given file? Currently, we are working with web applications, so I was hoping we could add something to web.config, but I am also interested in whether or not this is possible with windows forms, console apps, and/or class libraries.

    Read the article

  • Global Import/using Aliasing in .NET

    - by Josh Stodola
    Using import aliasing in a single class, we can reference class library namespaces by assigning our own custom alias like this: ' VB Imports Db = Company.Lib.Data.Objects // C# using Db = Company.Lib.Data.Objects; And then we are able to reference the classes inside of Company.Lib.Data.Objects by using the Db alias that we assigned. Is it possible to do this at the global level so that the alias is applied to the entire solution instead of the given file? Currently, we are working with web applications, so I was hoping we could add something to web.config, but I am also interested in whether or not this is possible with windows forms, console apps, and/or class libraries.

    Read the article

  • Creating a dynamic proxy generator with c# – Part 2 – Interceptor Design

    - by SeanMcAlinden
    Creating a dynamic proxy generator – Part 1 – Creating the Assembly builder, Module builder and caching mechanism For the latest code go to http://rapidioc.codeplex.com/ Before getting too involved in generating the proxy, I thought it would be worth while going through the intended design, this is important as the next step is to start creating the constructors for the proxy. Each proxy derives from a specified type The proxy has a corresponding constructor for each of the base type constructors The proxy has overrides for all methods and properties marked as Virtual on the base type For each overridden method, there is also a private method whose sole job is to call the base method. For each overridden method, a delegate is created whose sole job is to call the private method that calls the base method. The following class diagram shows the main classes and interfaces involved in the interception process. I’ll go through each of them to explain their place in the overall proxy.   IProxy Interface The proxy implements the IProxy interface for the sole purpose of adding custom interceptors. This allows the created proxy interface to be cast as an IProxy and then simply add Interceptors by calling it’s AddInterceptor method. This is done internally within the proxy building process so the consumer of the API doesn’t need knowledge of this. IInterceptor Interface The IInterceptor interface has one method: Handle. The handle method accepts a IMethodInvocation parameter which contains methods and data for handling method interception. Multiple classes that implement this interface can be added to the proxy. Each method override in the proxy calls the handle method rather than simply calling the base method. How the proxy fully works will be explained in the next section MethodInvocation. IMethodInvocation Interface & MethodInvocation class The MethodInvocation will contain one main method and multiple helper properties. Continue Method The method Continue() has two functions hidden away from the consumer. When Continue is called, if there are multiple Interceptors, the next Interceptors Handle method is called. If all Interceptors Handle methods have been called, the Continue method then calls the base class method. Properties The MethodInvocation will contain multiple helper properties including at least the following: Method Name (Read Only) Method Arguments (Read and Write) Method Argument Types (Read Only) Method Result (Read and Write) – this property remains null if the method return type is void Target Object (Read Only) Return Type (Read Only) DefaultInterceptor class The DefaultInterceptor class is a simple class that implements the IInterceptor interface. Here is the code: DefaultInterceptor namespace Rapid.DynamicProxy.Interception {     /// <summary>     /// Default interceptor for the proxy.     /// </summary>     /// <typeparam name="TBase">The base type.</typeparam>     public class DefaultInterceptor<TBase> : IInterceptor<TBase> where TBase : class     {         /// <summary>         /// Handles the specified method invocation.         /// </summary>         /// <param name="methodInvocation">The method invocation.</param>         public void Handle(IMethodInvocation<TBase> methodInvocation)         {             methodInvocation.Continue();         }     } } This is automatically created in the proxy and is the first interceptor that each method override calls. It’s sole function is to ensure that if no interceptors have been added, the base method is still called. Custom Interceptor Example A consumer of the Rapid.DynamicProxy API could create an interceptor for logging when the FirstName property of the User class is set. Just for illustration, I have also wrapped a transaction around the methodInvocation.Coninue() method. This means that any overriden methods within the user class will run within a transaction scope. MyInterceptor public class MyInterceptor : IInterceptor<User<int, IRepository>> {     public void Handle(IMethodInvocation<User<int, IRepository>> methodInvocation)     {         if (methodInvocation.Name == "set_FirstName")         {             Logger.Log("First name seting to: " + methodInvocation.Arguments[0]);         }         using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope())         {             methodInvocation.Continue();         }         if (methodInvocation.Name == "set_FirstName")         {             Logger.Log("First name has been set to: " + methodInvocation.Arguments[0]);         }     } } Overridden Method Example To show a taster of what the overridden methods on the proxy would look like, the setter method for the property FirstName used in the above example would look something similar to the following (this is not real code but will look similar): set_FirstName public override void set_FirstName(string value) {     set_FirstNameBaseMethodDelegate callBase =         new set_FirstNameBaseMethodDelegate(this.set_FirstNameProxyGetBaseMethod);     object[] arguments = new object[] { value };     IMethodInvocation<User<IRepository>> methodInvocation =         new MethodInvocation<User<IRepository>>(this, callBase, "set_FirstName", arguments, interceptors);          this.Interceptors[0].Handle(methodInvocation); } As you can see, a delegate instance is created which calls to a private method on the class, the private method calls the base method and would look like the following: calls base setter private void set_FirstNameProxyGetBaseMethod(string value) {     base.set_FirstName(value); } The delegate is invoked when methodInvocation.Continue() is called within an interceptor. The set_FirstName parameters are loaded into an object array. The current instance, delegate, method name and method arguments are passed into the methodInvocation constructor (there will be more data not illustrated here passed in when created including method info, return types, argument types etc.) The DefaultInterceptor’s Handle method is called with the methodInvocation instance as it’s parameter. Obviously methods can have return values, ref and out parameters etc. in these cases the generated method override body will be slightly different from above. I’ll go into more detail on these aspects as we build them. Conclusion I hope this has been useful, I can’t guarantee that the proxy will look exactly like the above, but at the moment, this is pretty much what I intend to do. Always worth downloading the code at http://rapidioc.codeplex.com/ to see the latest. There will also be some tests that you can debug through to help see what’s going on. Cheers, Sean.

    Read the article

  • Find Search Replace from landmark to landmark - including everything in between

    - by Erick Tronboll
    Appreciate some Jedi help... I have the following string: gi|374638939|gb|AEZ55452.1| myosin light chain 2, partial [Batrachoseps major] AAMGR repeating sporadically throughout my document and want to remove everything from: gi|37463 to the AAMGR sequence but, I want to keep the blocks where JQ250 appears: gi|374638936|gb|*JQ250*332.1| Batrachoseps major isolate b voucher DBW5974 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCNGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCATGCAATGGGGGCGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACCTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT TCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTCC CAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC and remove only the lines that have AEZ554 gi|374638939|gb|*AEZ554*52.1| myosin light chain 2, partial [Batrachoseps major] AAMGR ..................................... So, ideally the following block: gi|374638934|gb|JQ250331.1| Batrachoseps major isolate a voucher DBW5974 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCNGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCATGCAATGGGGGCGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACCTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT TCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTCC CAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC gi|374638935|gb|AEZ55450.1| myosin light chain 2, partial [Batrachoseps major] AAMGR gi|374638936|gb|JQ250332.1| Batrachoseps major isolate b voucher DBW5974 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCNGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCATGCAATGGGGGCGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACCTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT TCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTCC CAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC gi|374638937|gb|AEZ55451.1| myosin light chain 2, partial [Batrachoseps major] AAMGR gi|374638938|gb|JQ250333.1| Batrachoseps major isolate a voucher MVZ:Herp:249023 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCCGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCCTGCAATGGGGGTGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACTTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT CCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTC CCAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC gi|374638939|gb|AEZ55452.1| myosin light chain 2, partial [Batrachoseps major] AAMGR Would be left as just: gi|374638934|gb|JQ250331.1| Batrachoseps major isolate a voucher DBW5974 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCNGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCATGCAATGGGGGCGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACCTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT TCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTCC CAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC gi|374638936|gb|JQ250332.1| Batrachoseps major isolate b voucher DBW5974 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCNGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCATGCAATGGGGGCGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACCTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT TCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTCC CAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC gi|374638938|gb|JQ250333.1| Batrachoseps major isolate a voucher MVZ:Herp:249023 myosin light chain 2 gene, partial cds GCCGCCATGGGTAAGTGAACGCGCCGGACCAGACCATTCACTGCCTGCAATGGGGGTGTTTGTGGGTTGG AAGGTGTGCCAAAGATCTAGGGAACCCCAACTCCTCAGGATACGGGTGGGAGCCCTAAAATATGTCCAGC TATAAGGAGATGACCAATGGAAAAGGGGGTATCAGCAGTACTTTACTTGCTACTATAAGAGAATTGCATC CTGGGAATAGCCTCTGAAAGGTCCCATTTTAGCGACACTGGTAGATGGACACTGGCCTTTGGACAGCACC AGTAAGTAGAGCATTGCATCTTGGGATTCCTTTGCTGTTCACATGCCACTGAAAGCTCTCACCATAGCAG ATTCAAAATGCCTACCCGGCAGGTTGCCAGAAAAGCACTGCATCATGGGAGAACCACTTTTAGTGACAAT CCTAAGAGATGGGTGTCTCTCTGCCAGGCGCTATTATCCAAGAGACCCCAGTATGACGTCGTCATTGCTC CCAGGTAACCATGTTCTCACCCCCTCTCCCACAGGCCGC ................................many thanks as I help a struggling Grad Student

    Read the article

  • New Procurement Report for Transportation Sourcing

    - by John Murphy
    Welcome to our fourth annual transportation procurement benchmark report. American Shipper, in partnership with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA), surveyed roughly 275 transportation buyers and sellers on procurement practices, processes, technologies and results. Some key findings: • Manual, spreadsheet-based procurement processes remain the most prevalent among transportation buyers, with 42 percent of the total • Another 25 percent of respondents use a hybrid platform, which presumably means these buyers are using spreadsheets for at least one mode and/or geography • Only 23 percent of buyers are using a completely systems-based approach of some kind • Shippers were in a holding pattern with regards to investment in procurement systems the past year • Roughly three-quarters of survey respondents report that transportation spend has increased in 2012, although the pace has declined slightly from last year’s increases • Nearly every survey respondent purchases multiple modes of transportation • The number of respondents with plans to address technology to support the procurement process has increased in 2012. About one quarter of respondents who do not have a system report they have a budget for this investment in the next two years.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >