Search Results

Search found 18243 results on 730 pages for 'tcp connection'.

Page 21/730 | < Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >

• Is it possible to add tcp autotuning to windows xp?

  - by Caspin

  I have a network application that needs to send messages at 60 times a second. The messages are usually 300-400 bytes, but can be as large as 1500. The default setting for SO_SNDBUF is too small and limits the number of message that can be sent if the network latency is anything greater then 100ms. The naive solution is to just bump the SO_SNDBUF size to to something large. However, depending on the latency and the packet size that could be anywhere from 64K to 8MB. One of Vista's new features is TCP autotuning. Autotuning monitors the tcp connection and dynamically adjust the buffer sizes to allow for optimal communication. I would like to use auto tuning on our windows xp machine so I don't need to guess what my buffers sizes should be. Is there a way to install either a microsoft or 3rd party tcp autotuner on windows xp?

  Read the article

• Is it possible to add tcp autotuning to windows xp?

  - by Caspin

  I have a network application that needs to send messages at 60 times a second. The messages are usually 300-400 bytes, but can be as large as 1500. The default setting for SO_SNDBUF is too small and limits the number of message that can be sent if the network latency is anything greater then 100ms. The naive solution is to just bump the SO_SNDBUF size to to something large. However, depending on the latency and the packet size that could be anywhere from 64K to 8MB. One of Vista's new features is TCP autotuning. Autotuning monitors the tcp connection and dynamically adjust the buffer sizes to allow for optimal communication. I would like to use auto tuning on our windows xp machine so I don't need to guess what my buffers sizes should be. Is there a way to install either a microsoft or 3rd party tcp autotuner on windows xp?

  Read the article

• "ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host lost connection" when running cron job

  - by grautur

  I have a Ruby script that connects to a remote machine via ssh and executes a command. The script runs fine when I just run it in my terminal. In my crontab, I have 1 * * * * /bin/bash -l -c 'ruby myfile.rb' and if I go ahead and run /bin/bash -l -c 'ruby myfile.rb', everything executes fine. But when cron itself executes the job, I get a ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host error. What's the cause of this? How do I fix it?

  Read the article

• TCP 3 way handshake

  - by Tom

  Hi, i'm just observing what NMAP is doing for the 3 ports it reports are open. I understand what a half-scan attack is, but what's happening doesnt make sense. NMAP is reporting ports 139 are 445 are open..... all fine. But when i look at the control bits, NMAP never sends RST once it has found out the port is open, It does this for port 135- but not 139 and 445. This is what happens: (I HAVE OMITTED THE victim's replies) Sends a 2 (SYN) Sends a 16 (ACK) Sends a 24 (ACK + PST) Sends a 16 (ACK) Sends a 17 (ACK + FIN) I dont get why NMAP doesnt 'RST' ports 139 and 445??

  Read the article

• Mysql refusing connection: a very special connection issue

  - by k to the z

  I have my programers remoting into a web server with windows rdp. This web server is the only machine that can access another mysql server in a secure zone. When I remote into the web server from my machine I am able to connect to the mysql server through the mysql workbench on the web server. However, when I try this same procedure from another person's computer I can get into the server via rdp. I just can't connect to mysql using the workbench. I have checked and re checked the credentials and connection information. They match. I've had other people check and re check the credentials. As far as mysql permissions are concerned this user is allowed to connect from any machine. Plus I'm remoting into the same web server. The only difference seems to be which computer is remoting into the webserver. wtf?

  Read the article

• connection to apache server switches sockets connection

  - by Newben

  I have just post a question but I post an other one because the problem is not the one I had in thought when asking the latter. So, I am running some rails app on osx, when I run rails s, everything works fine. If I shut down the apache server (mamp) and if I run rails s again, I have this message Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/Applications/MAMP/tmp/mysql/mysql.sock', which for sure is normal. For info, my mamp server is running, and the connection must pass through /Applications/MAMP/Library/bin/mysql, so I aliased it by setting in my bash profile : alias mysql="/Applications/MAMP/Library/bin/mysql" Now, when I launch a rails generate command type, I get this message : /$root/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/mysql2-0.3.11/lib/mysql2/client.rb:44:in `connect': Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock' (2) (Mysql2::Error) So how it can be ?

  Read the article

• What is the Significance of Pseudo Header used in UDP/TCP

  - by mahesh

  I just wanted to know why Pseudo header is preceded to UDP. Why Pseudo header is used. whats the logic behind it.

  Read the article

• How do I make a TCP connection between 2 servers if both can start the connection ?

  - by DeeD

  I have a defined number of servers that can locally process data in their own way. But after some time I want to synchronize some states that are common on each server. My idea was that establish a TCP connection from each server to the other servers like a mesh network. My problem is that in what order do I make the connections since there is no "master" server here, so that each server is responsible for creating there own connections to each server. My idea was that make each server connect and if the server that is getting connected already has a connection to the connecting server, then just drop the connection. But how do I handle the fact that 2 servers is trying to connect at the same time? Because then I get 2 TCP connections instead of 1. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Unable to access certain websites from a computer

  - by matt74tm

  One of the desktop computers in my office is unable to access some particular websites. We've tried from Chrome, IE, Firefox, but no luck. eg: http://spsims.wto.org/ -> click on "Regular notifications" On the affected computer, every browser times out after the click. Whereas it should redirect the user to http://spsims.wto.org/web/pages/search/notification/regular/Search.aspx How can I diagnose this further? This is a Windows XP machine.

  Read the article

• java.net.SocketException: Connection reset

  - by Darryl

  I am getting the following error trying to read from a socket. I'm doing a readInt() on that InputStream, and I am getting this error. Perusing the documentation this suggests that the client part of the connection closed the connection. In this scenario, I am the server. I have access to the client log files and it is not closing the connection, and in fact its log files suggest I am closing the connection. So does anybody have an idea why this is happening? What else to check for? Does this arise when there are local resources that are perhaps reaching thresholds? Many thanks, Darryl

  Read the article

• TransactionScope and Connection Pooling

  - by Graham

  Hi, I'm trying to get a handle on whether we have a problem in our application with database connections using incorrect IsolationLevels. Our application is a .Net 3.5 database app using SQL Server 2005. I've discovered that the IsolationLevel of connections are not reset when they are returned to the connection pool (see here) and was also really surprised to read in this blog post that each new TransactionScope created gets its own connection pool assigned to it. Our database updates (via our business objects) take place within a TransactionScope (a new one is created for each business object graph update). But our fetches do not use an explicit transaction. So what I'm wondering is could we ever get into the situation where our fetch operations (which should be using the default IsolationLevel - Read Committed) would reuse a connection from the pool which has been used for an update, and inherit the update IsolationLevel (RepeatableRead)? Or would our updates be guaranteed to use a different connection pool seeing as they are wrapped in a TransactionScope? Thanks in advance, Graham

  Read the article

• Setting the database connection when using a TransactionScope

  - by eych

  Does the database connection have to be set inside a TransactionScope? Or can I set it in the ctor and then have instance methods create up a TransactionScope? EDIT: e.g. Public Sub New() Dim conn = new SqlConnection(...connection string) Public Sub SomeClassMethod() using ts as new TransactionScope //conn has already been initialized //so, here you can set commands, ExecuteDataSet, etc. vs Public Sub New() //nothing here Public Sub SomeClassMethod() using ts as new TransactionScope conn = new SqlConnection(...connection string) set commands, ExecuteDataSet, etc. the question is do you need to create the connection to the database after you've created a TransactionScope or can it be done before?

  Read the article

• Open/Close database connection in django

  - by mp0int

  I am using Django and Postgresql as my DBMS. I wish to set a setting that enables to enable/disable database connection. When the connection is set to closed (in settings.py) the site will display a message such as "meintanence mode" or something like that. Django will not show any db connection error message (or mail them to admins). It is appreciated if django do not try to connect to the database at all.

  Read the article

• Dynamic Connection Strings for Strongly Typed DataSet in a Class Library using App.Config

  - by Luc

  This is my first question on StackOverflow.com and I'm not sure if this is the correct way to do this. I found a similar question titled: Modifying the Data Source for the Strongly Typed Dataset Connection String. However, the answer provided is not working for me. I'm not able to comment on it because I don't have enough "reputation points" (again, I just signed up), and I didn't want to provide an "answer", because I don't know the correct answer. My problem is that I need to be able to modify the connection string inside the generated myproject.dll.config file, but doing so has no effect for me at all. My library still uses the default connection string that was setup at design time. I've tried everything I know to try, but still no luck. I've tried working around the issue using multiple different approaches, but still the problem persists. I can't find any help on the internet with my specific problem either. It would be great if somebody could shed some light as to why my modified config file isn't being read. Useful information: I'm using a Strongly Typed DataSet I don't know the actual connection string at design time. The app.config doesn't allow me to specify a 'User' scoped connection string. I'm tied to a class library (no Windows Forms) Thank you for any help! Luc

  Read the article

• Auto Encryption of web.config connection string

  - by Klaas Jan

  I want to encrypt the connection string in web.config, the problem is each time a developer changes the connection string in web.config and publishes, it needs to be encrypted every time in the web server. Is there any way that the connection string can encrypted automatically every time someone publishes it? Note :- All of us work on our local machines other than the server. So encryption using local machine key is not an option.

  Read the article

• How do I create a Solution Wide Connection String

  - by Renier

  Hi. Does anyone know if it is possible to create a single connection string that will be accessible to all the projects in a solution (we have about 6). I can create a text file with this information, but we need design time support as well, and it is not practical to have a connection string in every App.Config and Web.config file in the solution. We basically want a Single connection string that is easy to change should the location of the db change, that will also be used by the IDE for design time support Regards, Renier

  Read the article

• ODBC Connection Pooling

  - by beansy

  I have inherited a suite of .Net c# applications from a developer which talk to an Informix database on a unix server. Instead of using the usual practices for managing the database connections (disposable pattern / "open late / close early"), the code seems to open one ODBC connection when each app loads and doesn't close it. Connection pooling is turned via the ODBC administrator. Is there any way of seeing how many ODBC connections are open? What is the effect of turning off connection pooling? Am I right in thinking the .NET framework will use connection pooling anyway?

  Read the article

• Connection Multiplexing

  - by whoi

  Hi; Supposing we have opened a connection of type either TCP or UDP to another remote machine. Having this connection, can we allow multiple connections virtually over this connection like VPN(but not VPN)? I mean multiple applications run on remote machine and you try to access to these applications, is there any multiplexing mechanism or concept supporting such feature?

  Read the article

• ASP.NET user database without web.config connection strings

  - by vikp

  Hi, I'm wondering whether it's possible to use built in ASP.NET application services (aspnet_user, aspnet_role etc table) without specifying a connection string in a web.config. At the moment I store connection strings externally, but I keep finding hard-coded connection strings all over the web.config xml, various providers etc. It's driving me crazy. Thank you

  Read the article

• How to configure database connection securely

  - by chiccodoro

  Similar but not the same: How to securely store database connection details Securely connecting to database within a application Hi all, I have a C# WinForms application connecting to a database server. The database connection string, including a generic user/pass, is placed in a NHibernate configuration file, which lies in the same directory as the exe file. Now I have this issue: The user that runs the application should not get to know the username/password of the general database user because I don't want him to rummage around in the database directly. Alternatively I could hardcode the connection string, which is bad because the administrator must be able to change it if the database is moved or if he wants to switch between dev/test/prod environments. So long I've found three possibilities: The first referenced question was generally answered by making the file only readable for the user that runs the application. But that's not not enough in my case (the user running the application is a person. The database user/pass are general and shouldn't even be accessible by the person.) The first answer additionally proposed to encrypt the connection data before writing it to the file. With this approach, the administrator is not able anymore to configure the connection string because he cannot encrypt it by hand. The second referenced question provides an approach for this very scenario but it seems very complicated. My questions to you: This is a very general issue, so isn't there any general "how-to-do-it" way, somehow a "design pattern"? Is there some support in .NET's config infrastructure? (optional, maybe out of scope) Can I combine that easily with the NHibernate configuration mechanism?

  Read the article

• ASP.NET (VB) - Close an opened SQL connection inside Function

  - by B1GB0Y

  Can anyone tell me how I close an opened SQL connection inside a Function? I call a Select Function like this: Function Selec(ByVal SQLStr As String) As SqlDataReader Dim SQLConn As New SqlConnection() Dim SQLCmd As New SqlCommand() SQLConn.ConnectionString = Session("bd") SQLConn.Open() SQLCmd.Connection = SQLConn SQLCmd.CommandText = SQLStr Selec = SQLCmd.ExecuteReader End Function And in another page I do a While method to retrieve me the data like this: (Note: BDcon.BD is the name of the Class that have Functions) Dim write as New BDcon.BD Dim menu As SqlDataReader = writeBD.Selec("SELECT something from Table") While menu.Read 'Do something End While menu.Close 'This close just the DataReader and not the SqlConnection Finally I want to Close my SQL Connection by Function like this: Function Close() As SqlConnection Dim SQLConn As New SqlConnection() SQLConn.ConnectionString = Session("bd") SQLConn.Close() End Function I think that the problem is on the Close() Function, I want to close the connection but I don't know how to call my Opened Conneciton. Please anyone can help me? Thanks in advance :)

  Read the article

• How can I check my svn connection?

  - by Vepr

  How can I check my svn connection?

  Read the article

• trusted SQL Server connection

  - by dan_vitch

  When I attempt to make a connection from my console app to my sqlExpress. I get the following error: The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection. I have: Switched users Switched passwords Switched Servers Switched Databases I always get the same error. I am using VS 2010 and Sql Server 2005 Here is my current connection string SqlDatabase sqlDatabase = new SqlDatabase(@"Server=localmachineName\SQLEXPRESS;database=database1;user id=username password=mypassword;");

  Read the article

• Application not releasing database connection Spring.net + NHibernate

  - by anupam3m

  Even after successful transaction.Application connection with the database persist.in Nhibernate log it shows Nhibernate Log 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.SessionImpl [(null)] <(null) - executing flush 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.ConnectionManager [(null)] <(null) - registering flush begin 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.ConnectionManager [(null)] <(null) - registering flush end 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.SessionImpl [(null)] <(null) - post flush 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.SessionImpl [(null)] <(null) - before transaction completion 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.ConnectionManager [(null)] <(null) - aggressively releasing database connection 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Connection.ConnectionProvider [(null)] <(null) - Closing connection 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.SessionImpl [(null)] <(null) - transaction completion 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Transaction.AdoTransaction [(null)] <(null) - running AdoTransaction.Dispose() 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.SessionImpl [(null)] <(null) - closing session 2010-05-21 14:45:08,428 [Worker] [0] DEBUG NHibernate.Impl.BatcherImpl [(null)] <(null) - running BatcherImpl.Dispose(true) Underneath given is my dataconfiguration file -- Risco.Rsp.Ac.RMAC.Mapping Risco.Rsp.Ac.Logging.Appenders -- Please help me out with this issue.Thanks

  Read the article

• Java URL Connection Time Out

  - by webren

  Hello, I am attempting to connect to a website where I'd like to extract its HTML contents. My application will never connect to the site - only time out. Here is my code: URL url = new URL("www.website.com"); URLConnection connection = url.openConnection(); connection.setConnectTimeout(2000); connection.setReadTimeOut(2000); BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(connection.getInputStream()); String line; while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) { // do stuff with line } reader.close(); Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >