Search Results

Search found 43978 results on 1760 pages for 'select case'.

Page 217/1760 | < Previous Page | 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224  | Next Page >

• Which MySql line is faster:

  - by Camran

  I have a classified_id variable which matches one document in a MySql table. I am currently fetching the information about that one record like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE table.classified_id = $classified_id I wonder if there is a faster approach, for example like this: SELECT 1 FROM table WHERE table.classified_id = $classified_id Wont the last one only select 1 record, which is exactly what I need, so that it doesn't have to scan the entire table but instead stops searching for records after 1 is found? Or am I dreaming this? Thanks

  Read the article

• what's wrong in this sql?

  - by user292084

  select id from dm_unit where aa like '%'||?||'%'

  Read the article

• join codition in sqlserver

  - by Pallavi

  after applying join condition on two tables i want records which is maximum among records of left table my query SELECT a1.*, t.*, ( a1.trnratefrom - t.trnratefrom )AS minrate, ( a1.trnrateto - t.trnrateto ) AS maxrate FROM (SELECT a.srno, trndate, b.trnsrno, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnstate))) AS trnstate, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnarea))) AS trnarea, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnquality))) AS trnquality, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnlength))) AS trnlength, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnunit))) AS trnunit, b.trnratefrom, b.trnrateto, a.remark, entdate FROM mstprodrates a INNER JOIN trnprodrates b ON a.srno = b.srno)a1 INNER JOIN (SELECT c.srno, trndate, d.trnsrno, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnstate))) AS trnstate, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnarea))) AS trnarea, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnquality))) AS trnquality, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnlength))) AS trnlength, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnunit))) AS trnunit, d.trnratefrom, d.trnrateto, c.remark, entdate FROM mstprodrates c INNER JOIN trnprodrates d ON c.srno = d.srno) AS t ON a1.trnstate = t.trnstate AND a1.trnquality = t.trnquality AND a1.trnunit = t.trnunit AND a1.trnlength = t.trnlength AND a1.trnarea = t.trnarea AND a1.remark = t.remark WHERE t.srno = (SELECT MAX(srno) FROM a1 WHERE srno < a1.srno)

  Read the article

• print issue in safari

  - by designersvsoft

  I have used below css for select tag. select { vertical-align:middle; float:left; border:1px solid #cccccc; background-color:#F0F0F0; padding:2px; font-size:14px; height:35px ;} Here is the HTML version: <select> <option value="volvo">Volvo</option> <option value="saab">Saab</option> <option value="mercedes">Mercedes</option> <option value="audi">Audi</option> </select> If I see the print preview, it is not good on safari browser. Please help us.

  Read the article

• An Alternative to Views?

  - by Abs

  Hello all, I am just reading this article and I came across this: Filter: Remove any functions in the WHERE clause, don't include views in your Transact-SQL code, may need additional indexes. If I do not use views, what are the alternatives? I mean, in my situation, I want to select some data from a table and then use a few other select queries to work on the subset of data from the first select query? How can I do this efficiently? Thanks all

  Read the article

• Remove duplicates in entries, scala way

  - by andersbohn

  I have a list of entries stating a production value in a given interval. Entries stating the exact same value at a later time adds no information and can safely be left out. case class Entry(minute:Int, production:Double) val entries = List(Entry(0, 100.0), Entry(5, 100.0), Entry(10, 100.0), Entry(20, 120.0), Entry(30, 100.0), Entry(180, 0.0)) Experimenting with the scala 2.8 collection functions, so far I have this working implementation: entries.foldRight(List[Entry]()) { (entry, list) => list match { case head :: tail if (entry.production == head.production) => entry :: tail case head :: tail => entry :: list case List() => entry :: List() } } res0: List[Entry] = List(Entry(0,100.0), Entry(20,120.0), Entry(30,100.0), Entry(180,0.0)) Any comments? Am I missing out on some scala magic?

  Read the article

• Easiest way to choose a percentage of an amount of rows from a MySQL table?

  - by Rob

  I have a script that has a GET variable: $_GET['percentage'] I have a MySQL table of data. Now lets say that there are 100 rows of data in this table. In pseudo-code: SELECT data FROM table Now would it be possible to select $_GET['percentage'] of random data from table? For example (again in pseudo-code): $_GET['percentage'] = 10; SELECT 10% of data from table order by rand() If this IS possible, how could I do it?

  Read the article

• MessageBox.Show not raising HelpRequested event

  - by Trevortni

  I have a form that is showing a MessageBox using MessageBox.Show, and trying to receive events from the Help button on the MessageBox so I can execute my own code. The Microsoft documentation shows how to do this; however, using what is suggested does not work. Here's a shortened version of my code: Private Function MethodName() As Boolean AddHandler Me.HelpRequested, AddressOf Me.MsgBoxHelpRequested Select Case MessageBox.Show("Text", "Title", MessageButtons.YesNoCancel, MessageBoxIcon.Question, MessageBoxDefaultButton.Button2, 0, True) Case MsgBoxResult.Yes ' Do stuff Case MsgBoxResult.No ' Do stuff Case MsgBoxResult.Cancel RemoveHandler Me.HelpRequested, AddressOf Me.MsgBoxHelpRequested Return False End Select RemoveHandler Me.HelpRequested, AddressOf Me.MsgBoxHelpRequested End Function Private Sub MsgBoxHelpRequested(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal hlpevent As System.Windows.Forms.HelpEventArgs) ' Breakpoint that never gets hit ' More code End Sub I've been searching for a solution to this problem, but the best I've found is this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2407880/how-to-detect-help-button-press-in-windows-forms-messagebox that refers me back to the same Microsoft code that doesn't seem to be working. Can anybody help me with this? Thank you.

  Read the article

• How to get only the date from the sql server

  - by Pradeep

  this is what i want. but i have put only a specified date. SELECT BookName, Author, BookPrice FROM Book WHERE Book.Book_ID = ( SELECT Book_ID FROM Temp_Order WHERE Temp_Order.User_ID = 25 AND Temp_Order.OrderDate='3/24/2010' ) this is the date function i used. but it takes the time also. how to stop it. please help me SELECT Book_ID, BookName,Author,BookPrice FROM Book INNER JOIN FavCategory ON Book.Category_ID = FavCategory.Category_ID WHERE FavCategory.User_ID = " + useridlabel.Text + " AND OrderDate = **GETDATE()**

  Read the article

• Why do I need to give my options a value attribute in my dropdown? JQuery related.

  - by Alex

  So far in my web developing experiences, I've noticed that almost all web developers/designers choose to give their options in a select a value like so: <select name="foo"> <option value="bar">BarCheese</option> // etc. // etc. </select> Is this because it is best practice to do so? I ask this because I have done a lot of work with jQuery and dropdown's lately, and sometimes I get really annoyed when I have to check something like: $('select[name=foo]').val() == "bar"); To me, many times that seems less clear than just being able to check the val() against BarCheese. So why is it that most web developers/designers specify a value paramater instead of just letting the options actual value be its value? And yes, if the option has a value attribute I know I can do something like this: $('select[name=foo] option:contains("BarCheese")').attr('selected', 'selected'); But I would still really like to know why this is done. Thanks!!

  Read the article

• disabling "block selection" on an iPhone

  - by G. Shearer

  I am building an app for iPhone that has javascript running in a webview. When the new auto-select block selection tool is used to select text, and the block is resized from the side, it makes my javascript freak out. Does anyone know a way to disable the copy/paste for block selection? I still need to be able to select text, just not using the big selection tool. Thanks

  Read the article

• Nhibernate generate plain sql query instead of execution statement

  - by Wei Ma

  Using SQL profiler, I was able to find the query generated from Nhibernate was executed in the EXEC sp_executesql N'select ...' fashion. I am wondering if there is any way to force Nhibernate to generate the plain Select ... statement instead. The reason I want this is because apparently SQL Server generated different execution plans for them, and in my scenario, the plain "select ..." runs MUCH faster.

  Read the article

• Hiding result sets from multiple selects in a stored procedure

  - by Josh Young

  I have a stored procedure that retrieves SQL queries as text and executes the statements using sp_executesql. Each of the dynamic queries is a count query in that it only returns the number of records found (select COUNT(id) from...). I am looping through a set of SQL queries stored as text and building a table variable out of the results. At the end, I am selecting all the results from the table variable as the result set that I want returned from the stored procedure. However, when I execute the stored procedure, I am naturally getting multiple result sets (one for each of the dynamic queries and one for the final select.) Is there any way I can suppress the results of a select statement executed through sp_executesql? I have found answers that reference storing the results in a temp table, but I don't have control of the query text that I am running so I can't change it to select into anything. Please help. Thank you for your time.

  Read the article

• What's the best way to get a bunch of rows from MySQL if you have an array of integer primary keys?

  - by Evan P.

  I have a MySQL table with an auto-incremented integer primary key. I want to get a bunch of rows from the table based on an array of integers I have in memory in my program. The array ranges from a handful to about 1000 items. What's the most efficient query syntax to get the rows? I can think of a few: "SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id IN (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)" (this is what I do now) "SELECT * FROM thetable where id = 1 OR id = 2 OR id = 3" Multiple queries of the form "SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id = 1". Probably the most friendly to the query cache, but expensive due to having lots of query parsing. A union, like "SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id = 1 UNION SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id = 2 ..." I'm not sure if MySQL caches the results of each query; it's also the most verbose format. I think using the NoSQL interface in MySQL 5.6+ would be the most efficient way to do this, but I'm not yet up to MySQL 5.6.

  Read the article

• without including #include<ctype.h>

  - by venkat

  Hi,i am written below program .... without including #include also i am able to execute the program.... where these prototype are declare? 1) include int main() { if(isalnum(';')) printf("character ; is not alphanumeric"); if(isalnum('A')) printf("character A is alphanumeric "); return 0; } 2) include int main() { printf("Lower case of A is %c \n", tolower('A')); printf("Lower case of 9 is %c \n", tolower('9')); printf("Lower case of g is %c \n", tolower('g')); printf("ASCII value of B is %d \n", toascii('B')); printf("Upper case of g is %c \n", toupper('g')); return 0; }

  Read the article

• How to dynamically write the query in SQL Server 2008?

  - by user1237131

  How to write the dynamically the below query? Table empid designation interestes 1 developer,tester cricket,chess 1 developer chess 1 techlead cricket Condition: IF empid = 1 AND (designation LIKE '%developer%' OR designationLIKE '%techlead%') OR (interests LIKE '%cricket%'). How to write the above query dynamically if designations need to send more than 2,and also same on interstes . please tell me ... EDIT stored procedure code: ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_GetDevices] @id INT, @designation NVARCHAR (MAX) AS BEGIN declare @idsplat varchar(MAX) set @idsplat = @UserIds create table #u1 (id1 varchar(MAX)) set @idsplat = 'insert #u1 select ' + replace(@idsplat, ',', ' union select ') exec(@idsplat) Select id FROM dbo.DevicesList WHERE id=@id AND designation IN (select id1 from #u1) END

  Read the article

• how to intersect two "selects" and then put another condition for the result

  - by Shadi

  Hi, I want to intersect two "select" queries and then put another condition for the whole result. I mean: (select ... intersect select ...) where ... is it possible? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Passing arguments and conditions to model in codeigniter

  - by stormdrain

  I'm adding some models to a project, and was wondering if there is a "best practice" kind of approach to creating models: Does it make sense to create a function for each specific query? I was starting to do this, then had the idea of creating a generic function that I could pass parameters to. e.g: Instead of function getClients(){ return $this->db->query('SELECT client_id,last FROM Names ORDER BY id DESC'); } function getClientNames($clid){ return $this->db->query('SELECT * FROM Names WHERE client_id = '.$clid); } function getClientName($nameID){ return $this->db->query('SELECT * FROM Names WHERE id ='.$nameID); } } Something like function getNameData($args,$cond){ if($cond==''){ $q=$this->db->query('SELECT '.$args.' FROM Names'); return $q; }else{ $q=$this->db->query('SELECT '.$args.' FROM Names WHERE '.$cond); return $q; } } where I can pass the fields and conditions (if applicable) to the model. Is there a reason the latter example would be a bad idea? Thanks!

  Read the article

• How do I make a function in SQL Server that accepts a column of data?

  - by brandon k

  I made the following function in SQL Server 2008 earlier this week that takes two parameters and uses them to select a column of "detail" records and returns them as a single varchar list of comma separated values. Now that I get to thinking about it, I would like to take this table and application-specific function and make it more generic. I am not well-versed in defining SQL functions, as this is my first. How can I change this function to accept a single "column" worth of data, so that I can use it in a more generic way? Instead of calling: SELECT ejc_concatFormDetails(formuid, categoryName) I would like to make it work like: SELECT concatColumnValues(SELECT someColumn FROM SomeTable) Here is my function definition: FUNCTION [DNet].[ejc_concatFormDetails](@formuid AS int, @category as VARCHAR(75)) RETURNS VARCHAR(1000) AS BEGIN DECLARE @returnData VARCHAR(1000) DECLARE @currentData VARCHAR(75) DECLARE dataCursor CURSOR FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT data FROM DNet.ejc_FormDetails WHERE formuid = @formuid AND category = @category SET @returnData = '' OPEN dataCursor FETCH NEXT FROM dataCursor INTO @currentData WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0) BEGIN SET @returnData = @returnData + ', ' + @currentData FETCH NEXT FROM dataCursor INTO @currentData END CLOSE dataCursor DEALLOCATE dataCursor RETURN SUBSTRING(@returnData,3,1000) END As you can see, I am selecting the column data within my function and then looping over the results with a cursor to build my comma separated varchar. How can I alter this to accept a single parameter that is a result set and then access that result set with a cursor?

  Read the article

• With SQL can you use a sub-query in a WHERE LIKE clause?

  - by Jason

  I'm not even sure how to even phrase this as it sounds weird conceptually, but I'll give it a try. Basically I'm looking for a way to create a query that is essentially a WHERE IN LIKE SELECT statement. As an example, if I wanted to find all user records with a hotmail.com email address, I could do something like: SELECT UserEmail FROM Users WHERE (UserEmail LIKE '%hotmail.com') But what if I wanted to use a subquery as the matching criteria? Something like this: SELECT UserEmail FROM Users WHERE (UserEmail LIKE (SELECT '%'+ Domain FROM Domains)) Is that even possible? If so, what's the right syntax?

  Read the article

• What value should .net SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() return if no rows are affected?

  - by peacedog

  I have the following code: int result = -1; StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); SqlCommand cmd = MyConnection. sb.AppendLine("delete from Table1 where ID in"); sb.AppendLine("(select id from Table1 t1 where not exists(select * from Table2 t2 where t2.Table1ID = t1.ID))"); cmd.CommandText = sb.ToString(); result = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); _log.Info("StoredXMLDocument Records Deleted: " + result.ToString()); That SQL, in a more readable format, is: delete from Table1 where ID in (select id from Table1 t1 where not exists(select * from Table2 t2 where t2.Table1ID = t1.ID)) I know that the SQL, when executed directly in the database, deletes no rows. When this code runs, however, result gets a value of 1. I was expecting it to be 0. Am I missing something? Why is it 1?

  Read the article

• My SelectAll Funcatinality working in Firefox not in IE?

  - by kumar

  this is my Select all Checkboxes in Fieldset.. this code is working in Firefox not in Internet Explorer can anybody help me out? $('#PbtnSelectAll').click(function() { $('#PricingEditExceptions input[type=checkbox]').attr('checked', 'checked'); $('#PbtnSubmit').show(); $('#PbtnCancel').show(); $('fieldset').find("input:not(:checkbox),select,textarea").attr('disabled', 'disabled'); $('#genericfieldset').find("input,select,textarea").removeAttr('disabled'); }); thanks

  Read the article

• database assignment

  - by eric

  Hi, Given the following table: CREATE TABLE T1 (A INTEGER NOT NULL); CREATE TABLE T3 (A SMALLINT NOT NULL); INSERT T1 VALUES (32768.5); SELECT * FROM T1; INSERT T3 SELECT * FROM T1; SELECT * FROM T3; What is the output of above query? If any error occured please declare the line of it?Explain your answer!

  Read the article

• Selecting row in SSMS causes Entity Framework 4 to Fail

  - by Eric J.

  I have a simple Entity Framework 4 unit test that creates a new record, saves it, attempts to find it, then deletes it. All works great, unless... ... I open up SQL Server Management Studio while stopped at a breakpoint in the unit test and execute a SELECT statement that returns the row I just created (not SELECT FOR UPDATE, not WITH (updlock), no transaction, just a plain SELECT). If I do that before attempting to find the row I just created, I don't find the row. If I instead do that after finding the row but before deleting the row, I do find the row but get an OptimisticConcurrencyException. This is consistently repeatable. Unit Test: [TestMethod()] public void CreateFindDeleteActiveParticipantsTest() { // Setup this test Participant utPart = CreateUTParticipant(); ctx.Participants.AddObject(utPart); ctx.SaveChanges(); // External SELECT Point #1: // part is null // Find participant Participant part = ParticipantRepository.Find(UT_SURVEY_ID, UT_TOKEN); Assert.IsNotNull(part, "Expected to find a participant"); // External SELECT Point #2: // SaveChanges throws OptimisticConcurrencyException // Cleanup this test ctx.Participants.DeleteObject(utPart); ctx.SaveChanges(); }

  Read the article

• How do I generate optimized SQL with my (added) partial methods on LINQ entities

  - by Ra

  Let's say I have a Person table with a FirstName and LastName column. I extended the Person LINQ entity class with a get property "FullName", that concatenates the first and last names. A LINQ query like: from person... select fullName where id = x generates SQL selecting all Patient columns, since FullName is evaluated after firing the query. I would like to limit the select clause to only the 2 columns required. This is a simple example, but the limitation it shows is that I cannot isolate my business/formatting rules but have to embed them in the LINQ query, so they're not reusable (since it is in the select part) or I need select both columns separately, and then concatenate them higher up in the data or business layer with static helper methods. Any ideas for a clean design using the entity partial classes or extensions? Thanks

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224  | Next Page >