Search Results

Search found 32862 results on 1315 pages for 'release information'.

Page 22/1315 | < Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >

  • GNOME 2.30: Waiting for the Big Release

    <b>Datamation:</b> "GNOME 2.30 was originally intended to coincide with GNOME 3.0 -- a massive cleanup and rethinking of the popular desktop. However, GNOME 3.0 is delayed for at least another release, which leaves GNOME 2.30 as most likely the last version in a series stretching back almost a decade."

    Read the article

  • Partner Training: Oracle Endeca Information Discovery 3.1

    - by Roxana Babiciu
    Please join us on November 19 (NAS, LAD) or November 20 (EMEA) to learn about the new release of Oracle Endeca Information Discovery 3.1. The training covers new and exciting self-service discovery capabilities for business users for unstructured analytics, a live demo, and Q&A with the Product Management team. OEID 3.1 offers unique sales opportunities to all Endeca, BI, and Data Warehousing partners. Don’t miss!

    Read the article

  • Best practice to collect information from child objects

    - by Markus
    I'm regularly seeing the following pattern: public abstract class BaseItem { BaseItem[] children; // ... public void DoSomethingWithStuff() { StuffCollection collection = new StuffCollection(); foreach(child c : children) c.AddRequiredStuff(collection); // do something with the collection ... } public abstract void AddRequiredStuff(StuffCollection collection); } public class ConcreteItem : BaseItem { // ... public override void AddRequiredStuff(StuffCollection collection) { Stuff stuff; // ... collection.Add(stuff); } } Where I would use something like this, for better information hiding: public abstract class BaseItem { BaseItem[] children; // ... public void DoSomethingWithStuff() { StuffCollection collection = new StuffCollection(); foreach(child c : children) collection.AddRange(c.RequiredStuff()); // do something with the collection ... } public abstract StuffCollection RequiredStuff(); } public class ConcreteItem : BaseItem { // ... public override StuffCollection RequiredStuff() { StuffCollection stuffCollection; Stuff stuff; // ... stuffCollection.Add(stuff); return stuffCollection; } } What are pros and cons of each solution? For me, giving the implementation access to parent's information is some how disconcerting. On the other hand, initializing a new list, just to collect the items is a useless overhead ... What is the better design? How would it change, if DoSomethingWithStuff wouldn't be part of BaseItem but a third class? PS: there might be missing semicolons, or typos; sorry for that! The above code is not meant to be executed, but just for illustration.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 R2 Hits RTM, Release in May

    Microsoft today announced that SQL Server 2008 R2 has achieved release-to-manufacturing status and will be released in May worldwide....Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Download ASP.NET MVC 2 Release Candidate 2

    ASP.NET MVC is a free, fully supported framework that enables developers to quickly build standards-based, SEO-friendly Web sites by offering complete control over the HTML and URLs. Learn more about this release, and provide feedback to the team.

    Read the article

  • How to release bundled software with different licenses?

    - by mritz_p
    Recently, I was in a situation where I wanted to release a simple piece of JavaScript software under an open source license. However, I withdrew from it because the software contained several open source components that were released under different licenses. Under what license should the bundled software be released (given that various third party components are mixed into the software at code level)?

    Read the article

  • Procurement Release 12.1: What You Need to Know (Part 2 of 2)

    Release 12.1 has brought exciting changes to the Oracle Advanced Procurement suite. This AppCast details the enhancements and explains how they equip procurement professionals to tackle today's most pressing challenges. Topics include changes to Oracle Purchasing, Oracle Sourcing, Oracle Procurement Contracts, as well as previews of future releases.

    Read the article

  • Siebel 8.0 – Release Update

    Listen to Mike Betzer, Vice President, Product Strategy discuss Siebel's 8.0 release updates, customer momentum, the CRM On Demand Strategy as well as a preview into what is coming up.

    Read the article

  • Introducing Oracle Enterprise Manager 12c Release 4

    - by Roxana Babiciu
    Oracle continues to demonstrate its leadership in delivering innovations for IT Operations Management by introducing accelerated Zero-to-Cloud for Oracle-based private clouds with this latest release. Join a live webcast June 25th 9:00 AM PDT ! 12:00 PM EST by the Oracle Enterprise Manager team to learn more about capabilities that partners and customers can use to rapidly adopt private cloud across an enterprise. Register today!

    Read the article

  • Procurement Release 12.1: What You Need to Know (Part 1 of 2)

    Release 12.1 has brought exciting changes to the Oracle Advanced Procurement suite. This AppCast details the enhancements and explains how they equip procurement professionals to tackle today's most pressing challenges. Topics include changes to Oracle Purchasing, Oracle Sourcing, Oracle Procurement Contracts, as well as previews of future releases.

    Read the article

  • Upcoming Script# Release and LIDNUG presentation

    A quick heads up on a Script# presentation for the Linked.NET user group on LinkedIn, and some words (ummm... teasers) on the upcoming script# release...[Full post continued here...]...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Release Notes for 10/25/2012

    Below are the release notes from this week's deployment. Improvements and Bug Fixes Fixed issue with some Mercurial projects showing duplicate branch names within the branch drop-down. Several bug fixes and UI tweaks to the new source browsing experience. Have ideas on how to improve CodePlex? Please visit our suggestions page! Vote for existing ideas or submit a new one. As always you can reach out to the CodePlex team on Twitter @codeplex or reach me directly @mgroves84

    Read the article

  • ???????/???Oracle Database 11g Release 2?????????????????

    - by user788995
    ????? ??:2012/01/23 ??:??????/?? Oracle Database 11g Release 2 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????? ????????????????? http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/ondemand/otn-seminar/movie/111212_C-5_11gR2Upgrade.wmv http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/ondemand/otn-seminar/movie/mp4/111212_C-5_11gR2Upgrade.mp4 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/jp/ondemand/db-technique/c-5-11gr2upgrade-1448385-ja.pdf

    Read the article

  • My code works in Debug mode, but not in Release mode.

    - by Nima
    Hi, I have a code in Visual Studio 2008 in C++ that works with files just by fopen and fclose. Everything works perfect in Debug mode. and I have tested with several datasets. But it doesn't work in release mode. It crashes all the time. I have turned off all the optimizations, also there is no dependency to anything(in the linker), and also I have set these: Optimization: Disabled(/Od) Keep Unreferenced Data. Do Not Remove Redundant Optimize for Windows98: NO I still keep wondering how it should not work under these circumstances. What else should I turn off to let it works as in debug mode? I think if it works in release mode but not in debug mode, it might be a coding fault but the other way looks weird. isn't it? I appreciate any help. --Nima

    Read the article

  • Is there an automatic way to remove debugging methods for a release build?

    - by Lewis
    Note: This is an extension of an earlier question I asked here: Do additional function/method definitions increase a program's memory footprint? When I write a class, I usually end up writing several testing/debugging methods, used to make sure the class works as it should, or for printing data to help with debugging, or for unit testing, etc. Is there an easy/automatic way to make a release without these methods, or do I need to manually delete the extra code any time I want to compile a release version? I ask this question both from a C++ and a Java perspective. I'm using Code::Blocks and Eclipse as IDEs, if that plays into the answer somehow.

    Read the article

  • Can I just release the top object (iPhone)?

    - by yar
    If I release the object that's holding a reference to the variable that I need to release, is that sufficient? Or must I release at every level of the containment hierarchy? I fear that my logic comes from working with a garbage collector for too long. For instance, I assigned to this property of a UIPickerView instance by hand instead of using IB @property(nonatomic, assign) id<UIPickerViewDelegate> delegate Since it's an assign property, I can't just release the reference after I assign it. When I finally release my UIPickerView instance, do I need to do this: [singlePicker.delegate release]; [singlePicker release]; or is the second line sufficient? Also: Are these assign properties the norm, or is that mostly for Interface Builder? I thought that retain properties were the normal thing to expect.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >