Search Results

Search found 15878 results on 636 pages for 'hidden field'.

Page 220/636 | < Previous Page | 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227  | Next Page >

• Great Functionalities Of Kindle Portable Reader

  Technology has never stopped enhancing people?s way of life as the years go by. It has significantly contributed a lot in the field of reading by converting the printed books into something that is c... [Author: Ben Dave - Computers and Internet - June 02, 2010]

  Read the article

• project management for rookie

  - by macindows

  I'm new at the field of computer programming and I chose to learn it at the University, but I have some problems with project management, usually before I write any code I start to plan it on the paper, and when I'm finished I begin to code, but I understood that usualy I write only 20-30 percent from my planning, and I change my code a lot, can somebody recommend me a good book or blog about commong pitfalls and troubles with software planning and management.

  Read the article

• SQL SERVER Difference Between DATETIME and DATETIME2 WITH GETDATE

  Earlier I wrote blog post SQL SERVER Difference Between GETDATE and SYSDATETIME which inspired me to write SQL SERVER – Difference Between DATETIME and DATETIME2. Now earlier two blog post inspired me to write this blog post (and 4 emails and 3 reads from readers). I previously populated DATETIME and DATETIME2 field with SYSDATETIME, [...]...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

  Read the article

• Is my work on a developer test being taken advantage of?

  - by CodeWarrior

  I am looking for a job and have applied to a number of positions. One of them responded, I had a pretty lengthy phone interview (perhaps an hour +) and they then set me up with a developer test. I was told that this test is estimated to take between 6 and 8 hours and that, provided it met with their approval, I could be paid for my work on it. That gave me some pause, but I endeavored. The developer test took place on a VM accessed via RDP. The task was to implement a search page in a web project that requests data from the server, displays it on the screen in a table, has a pretty complicated search filtering scheme (there are about 15 statuses and when sending the search to the server you can search by these statuses) in addition to the string/field search. They want some SVG icons to change color on certain data values, they want some data to be represented differently than how it is in the database, etc. Loooong story short, this took one heck of a lot longer than 6-8 hours. Much of it was due to the very poor VM that I was running on (Visual Studio 2013 took 10 minutes to load, and another 15 minutes to open the 3 GB ginormous solution). After completing, I was told to commit my changes to source control... Hmm, OK. I get an email back that they thought that the SVGs could have their color changed differently, they found a bug in this edge-case, there was an occasional problem with this other thing that I never experienced, etc. So I am 13-14 hours into this thing now, and I have to do bug fixes. I do them, and they come back with some more. This is all apparently going into a production application. I noticed some anomalies in the code that was already in there where it looked like other people had coded all of one functionality and not anything else that I could find. Am I just being used for cheap labor? Even if they pay me the promised 50 dollars and hour for 6 hours, I have committed like 18 hours to this thing now. If I bug fix all of the stuff they keep coming up with, I will have worked at least 16 hours for free. I have taken a number of developer tests. I have never taken one where I worked on code that was destined for production. I have never taken one where I implemented a feature that was in the pipeline for development (it was planned for, and I implemented it through the course of the test). And I have never taken one that took 4 rounds and a total of 20+ hours. I get the impression that they are using their developer test to field some of the functionality, that they don't have time for in their normal team, on the cheap. Also, I wouldn't mind a 'devtest' tag.

  Read the article

• What is the Benefit of Offsite SEO

  Off site SEO is a massive field, which is extremely complex and is made up of lots of different factors. What I will look to do is touch on what I consider to be the most important areas and the impact which they can potentially have on your websites ranking within search engines. The primary and most important item in my experience is links.

  Read the article

• What implementation problems are still soaking up all of your time?

  - by Conor

  What implementation problems has the industry claimed to have solved many times, but are still soaking up all of your time? Examples: Cross platform GUI - mobile devices have blown this issue wide open. OO to RDBMS mapping - how do I map this attribute to that field in that database using that framework. You get the idea. Interface definitions - ..., CORBA, COM, EJB, WSDL, ..., etc Can you think of any others?

  Read the article

• Is this Hybrid of Interface / Composition kosher?

  - by paul

  I'm working on a project in which I'm considering using a hybrid of interfaces and composition as a single thing. What I mean by this is having a contain*ee* class be used as a front for functionality implemented in a contain*er* class, where the container exposes the containee as a public property. Example (pseudocode): class Visibility(lambda doShow, lambda doHide, lambda isVisible) public method Show() {...} public method Hide() {...} public property IsVisible public event Shown public event Hidden class SomeClassWithVisibility private member visibility = new Visibility(doShow, doHide, isVisible) public property Visibility with get() = visibility private method doShow() {...} private method doHide() {...} private method isVisible() {...} There are three reasons I'm considering this: The language in which I'm working (F#) has some annoyances w.r.t. implementing interfaces the way I need to (unless I'm missing something) and this will help avoid a lot of boilerplate code. The containee classes could really be considered properties of the container class(es); i.e. there seems to be a fairly strong has-a relationship. The containee classes will likely implement code which would have been pretty much the same when implemented in all the container classes, so why not do it once in one place? In the above example, this would include managing and emitting the Shown/Hidden events. Does anyone see any isseus with this Composiface/Intersition method, or know of a better way? EDIT 2012.07.26 - It seems a little background information is warranted: Where I work, we have a bunch of application front-ends that have limited access to system resources -- they need access to these resources to fully function. To remedy this we have a back-end application that can access the needed resources, with which the front-ends can communicate. (There is an API written for the front-ends for accessing back-end functionality as though it were part of the front-end.) The back-end program is out of date and its functionality is incomplete. It has made the transition from company to company a couple of times and we can't even compile it anymore. So I'm trying to rewrite it in my spare time. I'm trying to update things to make a nice(r) interface/API for the front-ends (while allowing for backwards compatibility with older front-ends), hopefully something full of OOPy goodness. The thing is, I don't want to write the front-end API after I've written pretty much the same code in F# for implementing the back-end; so, what I'm planning on doing is applying attributes to classes/methods/properties that I would like to have code for in the API then generate this code from the F# assembly using reflection. The method outlined in this question is a possible alternative I'm considering instead of implementing straight interfaces on the classes in F# because they're kind of a bear: In order to access something of an interface that has been implemented in a class, you have to explicitly cast an instance of that class to the interface type. This would make things painful when getting calls from the front-ends. If you don't want to have to do this, you have to call out all of the interface's methods/properties again in the class, outside of the interface implementation (which is separate from regular class members), and call the implementation's members. This is basically repeating the same code, which is what I'm trying to avoid!

  Read the article

• Vermont IT Jobs: C# Developer in Burlington

  Senior C# Engineer Qualifications: 5+ years of programming experience Strong C# development skills Thorough grounding in Object-Oriented design principles and design patterns Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science or related field Strong message-oriented development skills (JMS, MSMQ, TCP/IP, Web Services, etc.) Agile development background (understanding of methodology, terms, and process) Demonstrated teamwork and flexibility in previous work assignments Experience working...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

  Read the article

• Training of SEO - Open to All

  SEO is a very important subject matter nowadays and the SEO courses could be acquired through distance learning. Distance learning is basically a field of education which focuses upon giving education to students who are not physically present in a traditional classroom of a college or university.

  Read the article

• Who are the most influential computer scientists today? [closed]

  - by Banana

  Possible Duplicate: Which individuals are having the greatest impact on software developers today? Computer science has changed dramatically during the last decades, and new fields that recently arose in the scientific community are completely different with respect to classical cs related topics (for example, social network analysis). I'd like to have an overview of the most influential computer scientists in activity, or at least, who have been working during the last 10/15 years, possibly listed according to their specific field of study.

  Read the article

• Different domain for dirrenet thing or just one?

  - by Mahdi

  Suppose I'm starting my business my major is computer services like: graphic , programming, computer repair , networking and.... now the question is, what do you recommend for a better ranking? should i have a separate domain for each of these field or i can have them all in different pages/categories in one website? my preferred CMS system is Wordpress. and...do you recommend me using keywords in domain name even if it becomes hard to remember, meaningless and long? Thanks

  Read the article

• IT Job Titles ? What Do They Mean?

  Although only a few decades old, the information technology or IT field is as broad and deep as industries that have been around for centuries. IT job categories, titles and specialties abound -- so ... [Author: Allen B. Ury - Computers and Internet - March 27, 2010]

  Read the article

• RAID & UNIX UFS Data Recovery ? Is Data Recovery Always Possible?

  For those in the RAID data recovery field, those instances of data recovery that are most interesting are when there are multiple issues to contend with. Therefore when you combine a RAID failure wit... [Author: Michiel Van Kets - Computers and Internet - May 05, 2010]

  Read the article

• What legal considerations do I need to have when programming?

  - by JustJohn

  Recently I worked with a group to create a logging system for tutoring labs to track Tutor hours, and usage of the labs. We had to change the design a fair amount to be in compliance with FERPA. My question stems from the curiosity that in my course of study there has never been a real mention of how people in this field have to deal with complying with the law in their work. So I would like to know how much programmers have to consider the law in the work they do.

  Read the article

• Top 5 SEO Mistakes That You Do

  Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is an upcoming field which is helping develops and grow business like never before. With the onset of the internet age, more and more companies are going online with their products and services.

  Read the article

• Is there any reason in a Java program for a special naming for a function arguments?

  - by gasan

  I'd like to know, why would I want to have a special prefixes for a function arguments, like "p_name", "p_age", "p_sex"? On the one hand it helps to distinguish parameter from local variable or field further in the function body, but would it help? On the other hand, I didn't saw such naming recommendations anywhere including official Java language conventions. Please advise any reasons for using such naming policy

  Read the article

• What is SEO? Just Keyword and Backinks

  This is basic and exact definition of SEO according to our research and understanding search engine optimization and web promotion field. We all know what SEO stands for of course - Search Engine Optimization. This is the creativity of making your website more readers friendly, relevant to the interest of search engine users and hence ranking better in the search engine results.

  Read the article

• Free Webmaster Tools For Optimizing Web Search Engine Ranking For Your Websites and Blogs

  When the web was at infant stage, the search engine field was at nascent stage too and not dominated by any search engines as today. You could easily count the names of search engines, for example AltaVista, Excite, Lycos, Infoseek, HotBot and WebCrawler. The drawback of the absence of a good search engine was that you had to submit a query to all the search engines and hope for best.

  Read the article

• 5 Important Differences Between SEM and SEO Experts

  Internet marketing or online advertising is ripe with terms that we obviously have heard of very often - SEM and SEO. The extent to which these terms are popular and widely used is highly contrasting to the level of awareness and understanding that people have about them, especially how these terms are different. Let us try to understand how SEM and SEO compare with each other in terms of implementation and what different skill the experts in each field are expected and required to have.

  Read the article

• TechEd 2010 Day Three: The Database Designer (Isn't)

  - by BuckWoody

  Yesterday at TechEd 2010 here in New Orleans I worked the front-booth, answering general SQL Server questions for the masses. I was actually a little surprised to find most of the questions I got were from folks that wanted to know more about Stream Insight and Master Data Services. In past conferences I've been asked a lot of "free consulting" questions, about problems folks have had from older products. I don't mind that a bit - in fact, I'm always happy to help in any way I can. But this time people are really interested in the new features in the product, and I like that they are thinking ahead, not just having to solve problems in production. My presentation was on "Database Design in an Hour". We had the usual fun, and SideShow Bob made an appearance - I kid you not. The guy in the back of the room looked just like Sideshow Bob, so I quickly held a "bes thair" contest, and he won. Duing the presentation, I explain the tools you can use to design databases. I also explain that the "Database Designer" tool in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) isn't truly a desinger - it uses non-standard notation, doesn't have a meta-data dictionary, and worst of all, it works at the physical level. In other words, whatever you do in SSMS will automatically change the field/table/relationship structures in the database. We fixed this in SSMS 2008 and higher by adding an option to block that, but the tool is not a good design function nonetheless. To be fair, no one I know of at Microsoft recommends that it is - but I was shocked to hear so many developers in the room defending it as a good tool. I think the main issue for someone who doesn't have to work with Relational Systems a great deal is that it can be difficult to figure out Foreign Keys. The syntax makes them look "backwards", so it's just easier to grab a field and place it on the table you want to point to. There are options. You can download a couple of free tools (CA has a community edition of ER-WIN, Quest has one, and Embarcadero also has one) and if you design more than one or two databases a year, it may be worth buying a true design tool. For years I used Visio, but we changed it so that it doesn't forward-engineer (create the DDL) any more, so it isn't a true design tool either. So investigate those free and not-so-free tools. You'll find they help you in your job - but stay away from the Database Designer in SSMS. Or I'll send Sideshow Bob over there to straighten you out. Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! | live it!

  Read the article

• Taking requests!

  - by marc dekeyser

  Hi there!   Out there at Premier Field Engineering we have been very, very busy for the last couple of months and, as you can obviously see, this has been reflected in my activity here on the blog. Since I want to keep writing articles that keep you, as a reader,  entertained and have at least some level of value for you I am kindly requesting you to send me any subject you would love to see explained and I will address it to the best of my possibilities .   Cheers!

  Read the article

• Java @Contented annotation to help reduce false sharing

  - by Dave

  See this posting by Aleksey Shipilev for details -- @Contended is something we've wanted for a long time. The JVM provides automatic layout and placement of fields. Usually it'll (a) sort fields by descending size to improve footprint, and (b) pack reference fields so the garbage collector can process a contiguous run of reference fields when tracing. @Contended gives the program a way to provide more explicit guidance with respect to concurrency and false sharing. Using this facility we can sequester hot frequently written shared fields away from other mostly read-only or cold fields. The simple rule is that read-sharing is cheap, and write-sharing is very expensive. We can also pack fields together that tend to be written together by the same thread at about the same time. More generally, we're trying to influence relative field placement to minimize coherency misses. Fields that are accessed closely together in time should be placed proximally in space to promote cache locality. That is, temporal locality should condition spatial locality. Fields accessed together in time should be nearby in space. That having been said, we have to be careful to avoid false sharing and excessive invalidation from coherence traffic. As such, we try to cluster or otherwise sequester fields that tend to written at approximately the same time by the same thread onto the same cache line. Note that there's a tension at play: if we try too hard to minimize single-threaded capacity misses then we can end up with excessive coherency misses running in a parallel environment. Theres no single optimal layout for both single-thread and multithreaded environments. And the ideal layout problem itself is NP-hard. Ideally, a JVM would employ hardware monitoring facilities to detect sharing behavior and change the layout on the fly. That's a bit difficult as we don't yet have the right plumbing to provide efficient and expedient information to the JVM. Hint: we need to disintermediate the OS and hypervisor. Another challenge is that raw field offsets are used in the unsafe facility, so we'd need to address that issue, possibly with an extra level of indirection. Finally, I'd like to be able to pack final fields together as well, as those are known to be read-only.

  Read the article

• How do I transition from physics and math to programming?

  - by inovaovao

  I'm a physics PhD with little actual programming experience. I've always liked programming and played around with BASIC, Pascal as a teen, but the extent of my experience writing complex programs comes from an introductory course in computer science. Now I've decided that I'm more interested in programming than in physics and started to learn Java. Coming from a physics or math-heavy background, what would be the best strategy to maximize my value in the field?

  Read the article

• In Essence, Article Submissions Trade Knowledge For Back Links

  Article submissions are one of the legal ways of increasing your ranking when it comes to SEO and in addition this is favored by Google. If you are an expert in your field than you already know what visitors are searching for and all that you need to do have articles written which express your knowledge as well as expertise.

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2008 R2 Reporting Services: A generic error occurred in GDI+

  - by Greg Low

  While building some maps today in SQL Server 2008 R2 Reporting Services, I kept coming up with an error that said: A generic error occurred in GDI+ I was struggling to think what I'd done wrong. After much nashing of teeth and removal of hair, I finally worked out what the error was. When I got to the "Choose Color Scheme and Visualization" page of the map wizard for building a color analytical map, I hadn't picked the correct value for the "Field to Visualize" drop-down. I'm guessing that because...(read more)

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227  | Next Page >