Search Results

Search found 19742 results on 790 pages for 'search tree'.

Page 223/790 | < Previous Page | 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230  | Next Page >

  • Get More Traffic to Your Website With the Help of a SEO Company

    A SEO Company is an organization that deals with search engines to bring higher ranks for its client website and Keywords / Key phrases. It creates and implements strategies to get Top 10 ranking in search engine results pages (SERPs) for the targeted keywords / key phrases of the website. It deals with the changing algorithms of the search engines and changing human behavior.

    Read the article

  • SEO is Dead

    Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is a method businesses use to attempt to rise to the top of the results listings in Search Engines (SERPs). This has been a practice since search engines were invented for the Internet.

    Read the article

  • What is Meant by SEO?

    SEO, short for Search Engine Optimization, is a procedure which, if done correctly, can bring a larger quantity of visitors to a website or a blog from search engines and also furthers traffic quality. The visitors arrive at the web via daily search results where they are given a link to the website that contains data on the keyword they searched for.

    Read the article

  • Growing SEO Services

    If you are planning to start new online business and have your own website then you must be in search of legitimate service for search engine optimization so that you can get benefits of maximum sales and can earn well. This is desire of everyone to see his website on the top ten websites of every search engine and this is only possible when you will go through legitimate and professional services. These services were introduced from United States but slowly this trend came towards Asian countries.

    Read the article

  • How to Work With an SEO Company

    Is your website not attracting the number of visitors that it should? Are you sure whether it has been properly optimized for the search engines? Do searches of keywords that are relevant to your website show up your website in the top list of search results? If you have answered in the negative to any of the above queries, then it is high time you had a discussion with the representative of an organization that specializes in search engine optimization.

    Read the article

  • Guide to Maintaining an Effective Web Presence

    Most companies and professionals don't understand what it actually takes to maintain a solid web presence and how important it is, for both converting visits and maintaining a positive online public image, to rank well on search engines. Most people think that search engine optimization is simply optimizing a website for it to rank better on search engines.

    Read the article

  • The Importance of Content on Your Website

    Everybody these days uses Search Engines to find what they are looking for online, but how do search engines work? How, for example, does Google return a huge list of pages of results for a term you typed in to the search window, and how does it get it right so much of the time? Read on to find out...

    Read the article

  • SEO Techniques

    Search engine optimization is the technique by which you can attract your website's or blog's traffic. The important thing that is necessary for a website to be presentable in the search engine is the by making the website to understand search engine language.

    Read the article

  • Problem in searching String array [on hold]

    - by user2573607
    I'm working on a bank interface project, where I have to search an array of string when the user types in his username. The array has 10 strings, but only the first string is recognized as a valid username...I'm positive that the syntax of the search technique(Linear Search) is correct, but I cannot seem to find the problem. The code however compiles properly. Any answer will be appreciated, TIA! Aparna

    Read the article

  • Essential SEO Strategies

    Search engine optimization is a marketing technique to enhance the strategies and tactics used to improve a websites ranking in the search engines. There are strategies you can do in order to increase your sites ranking. If done effectively there should be an apparent increase in your sites placement on search engines.

    Read the article

  • Seeing Popular Tweets on Twitter Part 1

    Social networking sites have given a new life to the offspring of search engine optimization, that is to say, social media optimization and social media marketing. One of the recent entrants in the field of social media marketing is twitter. The search results shown on Twitter help SEO professionals in properly executing the search engine optimization process on the website.

    Read the article

  • Why Choose a Multilingual SEO Company?

    By choosing an SEO (search engine optimisation) company that only speaks English you are alienating an enormous amount of potential customers. The majority of countries within Europe and the rest of the world have their own languages and prefer to search on local search engines in that language.

    Read the article

  • SEO Always Necessary Or Not Really?

    SEO or Search Engine Optimization is a tactic used by companies and advertisers to get a website at the top of search engine results pages. The beauty of this tactic is that the results are more sustainable than almost any other form of advertising. In other words once a website has attained a top position on a search engine for a given keyword, the website will remain there or there about for time to come.

    Read the article

  • SEO Secrets - Take Over Google Today

    When I just started online marketing, I did my research on search engine optimization and wondered how would search engines like Google improve the quality of my business? And the key to that is article marketing. I know you're probably wondering, "How can articles increase your search engine optimization?

    Read the article

  • Using Keywords in Your SEO Campaign

    In order to be successful online you have to increase the natural search engine results for your website. Some sources suggest that the top three natural search results on Google get more than 60% of all clicks. How far down are you in the search engine listing?

    Read the article

  • How an SEO Company Optimizes a Business

    Search engine optimization or SEO enhances a business by generating traffic on a web site. Increased traffic is generated when a website is displayed at the very beginning of search results when a keyword/s is entered into a search engine, like Google.

    Read the article

  • Business Website and Importance of SEO

    The most important objective of search engine optimization is help a website come up on the search results of search engines. Today more and more business owners are using the web as a path to reach the customers globally.

    Read the article

  • Why is SQLite3 using covering indices instead of the indices I created?

    - by Geoff
    I have an extremely large database (contacts has ~3 billion entries, people has ~280 million entries, and the other tables have a negligible number of entries). Most other queries I've run are really fast. However, I've encountered a more complicated query that's really slow. I'm wondering if there's any way to speed this up. First of all, here is my schema: CREATE TABLE activities (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT NOT NULL); CREATE TABLE contacts ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, person1_id INTEGER NOT NULL, person2_id INTEGER NOT NULL, duration REAL NOT NULL, -- hours activity_id INTEGER NOT NULL -- FOREIGN_KEY(person1_id) REFERENCES people(id), -- FOREIGN_KEY(person2_id) REFERENCES people(id) ); CREATE TABLE people ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, state_id INTEGER NOT NULL, county_id INTEGER NOT NULL, age INTEGER NOT NULL, gender TEXT NOT NULL, -- M or F income INTEGER NOT NULL -- FOREIGN_KEY(state_id) REFERENCES states(id) ); CREATE TABLE states ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT NOT NULL, abbreviation TEXT NOT NULL ); CREATE INDEX activities_name_index on activities(name); CREATE INDEX contacts_activity_id_index on contacts(activity_id); CREATE INDEX contacts_duration_index on contacts(duration); CREATE INDEX contacts_person1_id_index on contacts(person1_id); CREATE INDEX contacts_person2_id_index on contacts(person2_id); CREATE INDEX people_age_index on people(age); CREATE INDEX people_county_id_index on people(county_id); CREATE INDEX people_gender_index on people(gender); CREATE INDEX people_income_index on people(income); CREATE INDEX people_state_id_index on people(state_id); CREATE INDEX states_abbreviation_index on states(abbreviation); CREATE INDEX states_name_index on states(name); Note that I've created an index on every column in the database. I don't care about the size of the database; speed is all I care about. Here's an example of a query that, as expected, runs almost instantly: SELECT count(*) FROM people, states WHERE people.state_id=states.id and states.abbreviation='IA'; Here's the troublesome query: SELECT * FROM contacts WHERE rowid IN (SELECT contacts.rowid FROM contacts, people, states WHERE contacts.person1_id=people.id AND people.state_id=states.id AND states.name='Kansas' INTERSECT SELECT contacts.rowid FROM contacts, people, states WHERE contacts.person2_id=people.id AND people.state_id=states.id AND states.name='Missouri'); Now, what I think would happen is that each subquery would use each relevant index I've created to speed this up. However, when I show the query plan, I see this: sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM contacts WHERE rowid IN (SELECT contacts.rowid FROM contacts, people, states WHERE contacts.person1_id=people.id AND people.state_id=states.id AND states.name='Kansas' INTERSECT SELECT contacts.rowid FROM contacts, people, states WHERE contacts.person2_id=people.id AND people.state_id=states.id AND states.name='Missouri'); 0|0|0|SEARCH TABLE contacts USING INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~25 rows) 0|0|0|EXECUTE LIST SUBQUERY 1 2|0|2|SEARCH TABLE states USING COVERING INDEX states_name_index (name=?) (~1 rows) 2|1|1|SEARCH TABLE people USING COVERING INDEX people_state_id_index (state_id=?) (~5569556 rows) 2|2|0|SEARCH TABLE contacts USING COVERING INDEX contacts_person1_id_index (person1_id=?) (~12 rows) 3|0|2|SEARCH TABLE states USING COVERING INDEX states_name_index (name=?) (~1 rows) 3|1|1|SEARCH TABLE people USING COVERING INDEX people_state_id_index (state_id=?) (~5569556 rows) 3|2|0|SEARCH TABLE contacts USING COVERING INDEX contacts_person2_id_index (person2_id=?) (~12 rows) 1|0|0|COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 2 AND 3 USING TEMP B-TREE (INTERSECT) In fact, if I show the query plan for the first query I posted, I get this: sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT count(*) FROM people, states WHERE people.state_id=states.id and states.abbreviation='IA'; 0|0|1|SEARCH TABLE states USING COVERING INDEX states_abbreviation_index (abbreviation=?) (~1 rows) 0|1|0|SEARCH TABLE people USING COVERING INDEX people_state_id_index (state_id=?) (~5569556 rows) Why is SQLite using covering indices instead of the indices I created? Shouldn't the search in the people table be able to happen in log(n) time given state_id which in turn is found in log(n) time?

    Read the article

  • How can i optimize this recursive method

    - by Tirdyr
    Hi there. I'm trying to make a word puzzle game, and for that i'm using a recursive method to find all possible words in the given letters. The letters is in a 4x4 board. Like this: ABCD EFGH HIJK LMNO The recursive method is called inside this loop: for (int y = 0; y < width; y++) { for (int x = 0; x < height; x++) { myScabble.Search(letters, y, x, width, height, "", covered, t); } } letters is a 2D array of chars. y & x is ints that shows where in the board width & height is also int, that tells the dimensions of the board "" is the string we are trying to make (the word) covered is an array of bools, to check if we allready used that square. t is a List (wich contains all the words to check against). The recursive method that need optimizing: public void Search(char[,] letters, int y, int x, int width, int height, string build, bool[,] covered, List<aWord> tt) { // Dont get outside the bounds if (y >= width || y < 0 || x >= height || x < 0) { return; } // Dont deal with allrady covered squares if (covered[x, y]) { return; } // Get Letter char letter = letters[x, y]; // Append string pass = build + letter; // check if its a possibel word //List<aWord> t = myWords.aWord.Where(w => w.word.StartsWith(pass)).ToList(); List<aWord> t = tt.Where(w => w.word.StartsWith(pass)).ToList(); // check if the list is emphty if (t.Count < 10 && t.Count != 0) { //stop point } if (t.Count == 0) { return; } // Check if its a complete word. if (t[0].word == pass) { //check if its allrdy present in the _found dictinary if (!_found.ContainsKey(pass)) { //if not add the word to the dictionary _found.Add(pass, true); } } // Check to see if there is more than 1 more that matches string pass // ie. are there more words to find. if (t.Count > 1) { // make a copy of the covered array bool[,] cov = new bool[height, width]; for (int i = 0; i < width; i++) { for (int a = 0; a < height; a++) { cov[a, i] = covered[a, i]; } } // Set the current square as covered. cov[x, y] = true; // Continue in all 8 directions. Search(letters, y + 1, x, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y, x + 1, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y + 1, x + 1, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y - 1, x, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y, x - 1, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y - 1, x - 1, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y - 1, x + 1, width, height, pass, cov, t); Search(letters, y + 1, x - 1, width, height, pass, cov, t); } } The code works as i expected it to do, however it is very slow.. it takes about 2 mins to find the words. EDIT: i clarified that the letters array is 2D

    Read the article

  • How to search and validate plain texts (where it starts with http AND ends with .aspx) to be a valid hyperlink in a page body content?

    - by syntaxcode
    My web page content is populated by a plain text that is retrieved from a CDATA format - plain text data. This is the site http://checksite.apsx to get information. For more information, visit http://moresites.com/FAQ/index.html or search the site. Now, my goal is to convert this plain text to a valid hyperlinks. I've used a javascript code that does the conversion - /((http|https|ftp):\/\/[^ ]+)/g; , but sometimes if there are multiple words, it captures an invalid URL. My question: Is there a way to strictly capture any string that starts with "http" AND ends with ".html" or "aspx" will be converted into a valid hyperlink? it should look like this - This is the site http://checksite.apsx to get information. For more information, visit http://moresites.com/FAQ/index.html or search the site.

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio: Add Item / Add as link rather than just Add

    - by Pete d'Oronzio
    I'm new to visual studio, coming from Delphi. I have a directory tree full of .cs files (root is \Common). I also have a directory tree full of Applications (root is \Applications) Finally, I've got a tree full of Assemblies (root is \Assemblies) I'd like to keep my .cs files in the Common tree and all the environment voodoo (solutions, projects, settings, metadata, debug data, bin, etc.) in the Assmblies tree. So, for a simple example, I've got an assembly called PdMagic.Common.Math.dll. The Solution and project is located in \Assemblies\Common\Math. All of its source (.cs) files are in \Common\Math. (matrix.cs, trig.cs, mathtypes.cs, mathfuncs.cs, stats.cs, etc.) When I use Add Existing Item to add matrix.cs to my project, a copy of it is added to the \Assemblies\Common\Math folder. I just want to reference it. I don't want multiple copies laying around. I've tried Add Existing Item, and used the drop down to "Add link" rather than just "Add", and that seems to do what I want. Question: What is the "best practice" for this sort of thing? Do most people just put those .cs files all in the same folder as the project? Why isn't "Add link" the default? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • gwt+xml- can i read through incomplete XML using the GWT XML Parser

    - by Arvind
    I have a requirement where a user is typing in XML in a text area, and I want to show the various nodes in a tree...But as the user is typing in the xml, it wont be a complete xml (since he is still typing in the XML)... How do I read an incomplete XML and correctly generate the tree? I understand how to read an xml and generate nodes in the tree, what I want to know is, how to read the incomplete XML as it is being typed in

    Read the article

  • jstree select node

    - by niao
    Greetings, I am using jsTree to generatate my hierarchical data. JsTree is generated as follows: $(function() { $("#industries").tree({ data: { type: "json", opts: { url: "/Admin/GetIndustries/" } } }); }); it works find and the jsonresult is something like: [{"attributes":[],"data":{"title":"Adwokaci, Notariusze","id":"1a051101-c3fa-48f2-b2e1-c60d1b67ea22"},"children":[{"attributes":[],"data":{"title":"Kancelarie adwokackie","id":"26d6cff1-3c7f-4a2f-bf5a-422e08127b43" my question is: how can I save id of selected node in some hidden field? I do something like this: <script type="text/javascript"> $("#industries").click(function() { var tree = $.tree.reference("industries"); var t = $.tree.focused(); if (t.selected) t.selected; else alert("Select a node first"); alert(t.id); }); but it does not work. Can someone please help me?

    Read the article

  • UISearchBar and UINavigationItem

    - by tbehunin
    I can't seem to get a UISearchBar to position itself from the far left to the far right in the navigation bar. In the -(void)viewDidLoad method, I have the following code: `UISearchBar *sb = [[UISearchBar alloc] initWithFrame:self.tableView.tableHeaderView.frame]; sb.delegate = self; self.navigationItem.titleView = sb; [sb sizeToFit]; [sb release];` When you build and run, it looks just fine at first glance. However, looking more closely, you can tell there is a margin/space on the left. This wouldn't be a big deal in the grand scheme of things, but when I tap the search bar to start a search, I animate the cancel button into view. Because the search bar is positioned slightly to the right, the animation is jerky and the cancel button falls off the end like so: link text It seems as if the UINavigationItem is like a table with three cells, where there is a padding on the first and last which I can't remove - nor does there seem to be a way to 'merge' it all together and then place the search bar there. I know this look is possible, because the AppStore search has a search bar in the navigation bar and it goes all the way to the edges. Anyone know how to get the search bar to go all the way to the edges so my slide-in cancel button animation will work properly?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230  | Next Page >