Search Results

Search found 1488 results on 60 pages for 'kohana orm'.

Page 23/60 | < Previous Page | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30  | Next Page >

• How to detect open database connection with Hibernate / JPA?

  - by John K

  I am learning JPA w/Hibernate using a Java SE 6 project. I'd simply like to be able to detect if the connection between Hibernate and my database (MS SQL Server) is open. For example, I'd like to be able to detect this, log it, and try reconnecting again in 60 seconds. This is what I thought would work but isOpen() doesn't appear to be what I want (always is true): EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("rcc", props); if (emf != null && emf.isOpen()) { EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager(); if (em == null || !emf.isOpen()) // error connecting to database else ... This seems to me to be a simple problem, but I cannot find an answer!

  Read the article

• What is lazy loading in Hibernate?

  - by rocker

  What is lazy loading in Java? I don't understand the process. Can anybody help me to understand the process of lazy loading?

  Read the article

• Having an issue with org.hibernate.SessionException: Session is closed! in Hibernate

  - by hal10001

  I've done quite a bit a research on this with no luck, but all the answers have a tendency to point toward the session context settings in the config file. What is odd is that I get a session connection the very first time I hit the page (and therefore, a successful result set), but then when I reload I get the following exception: org.hibernate.SessionException: Session is closed! Here are my config settings that are not DB connection string related: <property name="hibernate.show_sql">false</property> <property name="hibernate.dialect">org.hibernate.dialect.SQLServerDialect</property> <property name="hibernate.current_session_context_class">thread</property> <property name="hibernate.cache.provider_class">org.hibernate.cache.NoCacheProvider</property> <property name="hibernate.cache.use_query_cache">false</property> <property name="hibernate.cache.use_minimal_puts">false</property> Here is an example of a call I make that produces the situation I described above. public T get(int id) { session.beginTransaction(); T type; try { type = getTypeClass().cast(session.get(getTypeClass(), id)); } catch (ClassCastException classCastException) { throw new ClassCastException(classCastException.getMessage()); } session.getTransaction().commit(); return type; } The session variable reference is to a static field that contains the current session. All of the session connection details are textbook reference manual. For example, here is my Hibernate session utility: import org.hibernate.SessionFactory; import org.hibernate.cfg.Configuration; public class HibernateSessionFactoryUtil { private static final SessionFactory sessionFactory = buildSessionFactory(); private static SessionFactory buildSessionFactory() { try { return new Configuration().configure().buildSessionFactory(); } catch (Throwable ex) { System.err.println("Initial SessionFactory creation failed." + ex); throw new ExceptionInInitializerError(ex); } } public static SessionFactory getSessionFactory() { return sessionFactory; } }

  Read the article

• How to Generate Castle ActiveRecord C# Classes for an Existing Database

  - by Russell Giddings

  What is the best way to generate C# classes for use with Castle ActiveRecord and NHibernate given an existing database structure? Can you recommend any of the class generation tools or is it just less hassle to write the classes by hand?

  Read the article

• How to generate Doctrine models/classes that extend a custom record class

  - by Shane O'Grady

  When I use Doctrine to generate classes from Yaml/db each Base class (which includes the table definition) extends the Doctrine_Record class. Since my app uses a master and (multiple) slave db servers I need to be able to make the Base classes extend my custom record class to force writes to go to the master db server (as described here). However if I change the base class manually I lose it again when I regenerate my classes from Yaml/db using Doctrine. I need to find a way of telling Doctrine to extend my own Base class, or find a different solution to a master/slave db setup using Doctrine. Example generated model: abstract class My_Base_User extends Doctrine_Record { However I need it to be automatically generated as: abstract class My_Base_User extends My_Record { I am using Doctrine 1.2.1 in a new Zend Framework 1.9.6 application if it makes any difference.

  Read the article

• JPA Secondary Table Issue

  - by Smithers

  I have a three tables: User, Course, and Test. Course has a User foreign key and Test has a Course foreign key. I am having trouble mapping the Test collection for each User since I need an intermediary step from User - Course - Test. I am trying to use a SecondaryTable since the User key for the Test is its associated Course row. Am I on the right track using SecondaryTable or is there a way to use a JoinTable without the inverseJoinColumn?

  Read the article

• Entity Framework: Generating database from classes

  - by Anonymous Coward

  Hi Everyone Is it possible to create the database from the classes with entity framework 4.0? I found many tutorials on how to do it the other way round. But since we have already implemented and tested all classes of the domain we'd like to avoid changing them to much. If I used the wrong keywords in Google I'd appreciate you could post a link. Cheers, CA

  Read the article

• Updatable false behvior incosistent

  - by jpanewbie

  I need LastUpdatedDttm to be updated by SYSDATE whenever record is updated. But below annoataions do nt work as desired. SYSDATE is inserted only once and not updated for subsequent updations. Also, lastUpdDTTM is not part of sql generated by hibernate. @Generated(GenerationTime.ALWAYS) @Column(name="LAST_UPDATED_DTTM",insertable=false,updatable=true, columnDefinition ="timestamp default SYSDATE") private Date lastUpdDTTM; @Generated(GenerationTime.ALWAYS) @Column(name="CREATED_DTTM", insertable=false, updatable=false) private Date createdDTTM;

  Read the article

• FluentNHibernate Many-To-One References where Foreign Key is not to Primary Key and column names are

  - by Todd Langdon

  I've been sitting here for an hour trying to figure this out... I've got 2 tables (abbreviated): CREATE TABLE TRUST ( TRUSTID NUMBER NOT NULL, ACCTNBR VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL ) CONSTRAINT TRUST_PK PRIMARY KEY (TRUSTID) CREATE TABLE ACCOUNTHISTORY ( ID NUMBER NOT NULL, ACCOUNTNUMBER VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL, TRANSAMT NUMBER(38,2) NOT NULL POSTINGDATE DATE NOT NULL ) CONSTRAINT ACCOUNTHISTORY_PK PRIMARY KEY (ID) I have 2 classes that essentially mirror these: public class Trust { public virtual int Id {get; set;} public virtual string AccountNumber { get; set; } } public class AccountHistory { public virtual int Id { get; set; } public virtual Trust Trust {get; set;} public virtual DateTime PostingDate { get; set; } public virtual decimal IncomeAmount { get; set; } } How do I do the many-to-one mapping in FluentNHibernate to get the AccountHistory to have a Trust? Specifically, since it is related on a different column than the Trust primary key of TRUSTID and the column it is referencing is also named differently (ACCTNBR vs. ACCOUNTNUMBER)???? Here's what I have so far - how do I do the References on the AccountHistoryMap to Trust??? public class TrustMap : ClassMap<Trust> { public TrustMap() { Table("TRUST"); Id(x => x.Id).Column("TRUSTID"); Map(x => x.AccountNumber).Column("ACCTNBR"); } } public class AccountHistoryMap : ClassMap<AccountHistory> { public AccountHistoryMap() { Table("TRUSTACCTGHISTORY"); Id (x=>x.Id).Column("ID"); References<Trust>(x => x.Trust).Column("ACCOUNTNUMBER").ForeignKey("ACCTNBR").Fetch.Join(); Map(x => x.PostingDate).Column("POSTINGDATE"); ); I've tried a few different variations of the above line but can't get anything to work - it pulls back AccountHistory data and a proxy for the Trust; however it says no Trust row with given identifier. This has to be something simple. Anyone? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• How should I store an Java Enum in JavaDB?

  - by Jonas

  How should I store an Java Enum in JavaDB? Should I try to map the enums to SMALLINT and keep the values in source code only? The embedded database is only used by a single application. Or should I just store the values as DECIMAL? None of these solutions feels good/robust for me. Is there any better alternatives? Here is my enum: import java.math.BigDecimal; public enum Vat { NORMAL(new BigDecimal("0.25")), FOOD(new BigDecimal("0.12")), BOOKS(new BigDecimal("0.06")), NONE(new BigDecimal("0.00")); private final BigDecimal value; Vat(BigDecimal val) { value = val; } public BigDecimal getValue() { return value; } } I have read other similar questions on this topic, but the problem or solution doesn't match my problem. Enum storage in Database field, Best method to store Enum in Database, Best way to store enum values in database - String or Int

  Read the article

• Is this a right way to use NHibernate?

  - by Venemo

  I spent the rest of the evening reading StackOverflow questions and also some blog entries and links about the subject. All of them turned out to be very helpful, but I still feel that they don't really answer my question. So, I'm developing a simple web application. I'd like to create a reusable data access layer which I can later reuse in other solutions. 99% of these will be web applications. This seems to be a good excuse for me to learn NHibernate and some of the patterns around it. My goals are the following: I don't want the business logic layer to know ANYTHING about the inner workings of the database, nor NHibernate itself. I want the business logic layer to have the least possible number of assumptions about the data access layer. I want the data access layer as simplistic and easy-to-use as possible. This is going to be a simple project, so I don't want to overcomplicate anything. I want the data access layer to be as non-intrusive as possible. Will all this in mind, I decided to use the popular repository pattern. I read about this subject on this site and on various dev blogs, and I heard some stuff about the unit of work pattern. I also looked around and checked out various implementations. (Including FubuMVC contrib, and SharpArchitecture, and stuff on some blogs.) I found out that most of these operate with the same principle: They create a "unit of work" which is instantiated when a repository is instantiated, they start a transaction, do stuff, and commit, and then start all over again. So, only one ISession per Repository and that's it. Then the client code needs to instantiate a repository, do stuff with it, and then dispose. This usage pattern doesn't meet my need of being as simplistic as possible, so I began thinking about something else. I found out that NHibernate already has something which makes custom "unit of work" implementations unnecessary, and that is the CurrentSessionContext class. If I configure the session context correctly, and do the clean up when necessary, I'm good to go. So, I came up with this: I have a static class called NHibernateHelper. Firstly, it has a static property called CurrentSessionFactory, which upon first call, instantiates a session factory and stores it in a static field. (One ISessionFactory per one AppDomain is good enough.) Then, more importantly, it has a CurrentSession static property, which checks if there is an ISession bound to the current session context, and if not, creates one, and binds it, and it returns with the ISession bound to the current session context. Because it will be used mostly with WebSessionContext (so, one ISession per HttpRequest, although for the unit tests, I configured ThreadStaticSessionContext), it should work seamlessly. And after creating and binding an ISession, it hooks an event handler to the HttpContext.Current.ApplicationInstance.EndRequest event, which takes care of cleaning up the ISession after the request ends. (Of course, it only does this if it is really running in a web environment.) So, with all this set up, the NHibernateHelper will always be able to return a valid ISession, so there is no need to instantiate a Repository instance for the "unit of work" to operate properly. Instead, the Repository is a static class which operates with the ISession from the NHibernateHelper.CurrentSession property, and exposes some functionality through that. I'm curious, what do you think about this? Is it a valid way of thinking, or am I completely off track here?

  Read the article

• Error when trying to use hibernate annotations.

  - by Wilhelm

  The error I'm receiving is listed here. That's my HibernateUtil.java package com.rosejapan; import org.hibernate.SessionFactory; import org.hibernate.cfg.AnnotationConfiguration;; public class HibernateUtil { private static final SessionFactory sessionFactory; static { try { // Create the SessionFactory from hibernate.cfg.xml sessionFactory = new AnnotationConfiguration().configure().buildSessionFactory(); } catch(Throwable e) { System.err.println("Initial sessionFactory creation failed. " + e); throw new ExceptionInInitializerError(e); } } public static SessionFactory getSessionFactory() { return sessionFactory; } } Everything looks all right... I've already included log4j-boot.jar in the CLASSPATH, but didn't resolved my problem.

  Read the article

• In symfony/doctrine's schema.yml, where should I put onDelete: CASCADE for a many-to-many relationsh

  - by nselikoff

  I have a many-to-many relationship defined in my Symfony (using doctrine) project between Orders and Upgrades (an Order can be associated with zero or more Upgrades, and an Upgrade can apply to zero or more Orders). # schema.yml Order: columns: order_id: {...} relations: Upgrades: class: Upgrade local: order_id foreign: upgrade_id refClass: OrderUpgrade Upgrade: columns: upgrade_id: {...} relations: Orders: class: Order local: upgrade_id foreign: order_id refClass: OrderUpgrade OrderUpgrade: columns: order_id: {...} upgrade_id: {...} I want to set up delete cascade behavior so that if I delete an Order or an Upgrade, all of the related OrderUpgrades are deleted. Where do I put onDelete: CASCADE? Usually I would put it at the end of the relations section, but that would seem to imply in this case that deleting Orders would cascade to delete Upgrades. Is Symfony + Doctrine smart enough to know what I'm wanting if I put onDelete: CASCADE in the above relations sections of schema.yml?

  Read the article

• JPA Entity Manager resource handling

  - by chiragshahkapadia

  Every time I call JPA method its creating entity and binding query. My persistence properties are: <property name="hibernate.dialect" value="org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle10gDialect"/> <property name="hibernate.cache.provider_class" value="net.sf.ehcache.hibernate.SingletonEhCacheProvider"/> <property name="hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache" value="true"/> <property name="hibernate.cache.use_query_cache" value="true"/> And I am creating entity manager the way shown below: emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("pu"); em = emf.createEntityManager(); em = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("pu").createEntityManager(); Is there any nice way to manage entity manager resource instead create new every time or any property can set in persistence. Remember it's JPA. See below binding log every time : 15:35:15,527 INFO [AnnotationBinder] Binding entity from annotated class: * 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: * = * 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: * = * 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [QueryBinder] Binding Named query: 15:35:15,527 INFO [EntityBinder] Bind entity com.* on table * 15:35:15,542 INFO [HibernateSearchEventListenerRegister] Unable to find org.hibernate.search.event.FullTextIndexEventListener on the classpath. Hibernate Search is not enabled. 15:35:15,542 INFO [NamingHelper] JNDI InitialContext properties:{} 15:35:15,542 INFO [DatasourceConnectionProvider] Using datasource: 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] RDBMS: and Real Application Testing options 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] JDBC driver: Oracle JDBC driver, version: 9.2.0.1.0 15:35:15,542 INFO [Dialect] Using dialect: org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle10gDialect 15:35:15,542 INFO [TransactionFactoryFactory] Transaction strategy: org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransactionFactory 15:35:15,542 INFO [TransactionManagerLookupFactory] No TransactionManagerLookup configured (in JTA environment, use of read-write or transactional second-level cache is not recomm ended) 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Automatic flush during beforeCompletion(): disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Automatic session close at end of transaction: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] JDBC batch size: 15 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] JDBC batch updates for versioned data: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Scrollable result sets: enabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] JDBC3 getGeneratedKeys(): disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Connection release mode: auto 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Default batch fetch size: 1 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Generate SQL with comments: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Order SQL updates by primary key: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Order SQL inserts for batching: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Query translator: org.hibernate.hql.ast.ASTQueryTranslatorFactory 15:35:15,542 INFO [ASTQueryTranslatorFactory] Using ASTQueryTranslatorFactory 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Query language substitutions: {} 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] JPA-QL strict compliance: enabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Second-level cache: enabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Query cache: enabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Cache region factory : org.hibernate.cache.impl.bridge.RegionFactoryCacheProviderBridge 15:35:15,542 INFO [RegionFactoryCacheProviderBridge] Cache provider: net.sf.ehcache.hibernate.SingletonEhCacheProvider 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Optimize cache for minimal puts: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Structured second-level cache entries: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Query cache factory: org.hibernate.cache.StandardQueryCacheFactory 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Statistics: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Deleted entity synthetic identifier rollback: disabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Default entity-mode: pojo 15:35:15,542 INFO [SettingsFactory] Named query checking : enabled 15:35:15,542 INFO [SessionFactoryImpl] building session factory 15:35:15,542 INFO [SessionFactoryObjectFactory] Not binding factory to JNDI, no JNDI name configured 15:35:15,542 INFO [UpdateTimestampsCache] starting update timestamps cache at region: org.hibernate.cache.UpdateTimestampsCache 15:35:15,542 INFO [StandardQueryCache] starting query cache at region: org.hibernate.cache.StandardQueryCache

  Read the article

• I Want to get a week value

  - by satya

  I wan to get the value of only one week. I am using the following JPA query: SELECT a FROM questions.dao.hibernate.Questions a WHERE (a.posted_date-CURRENT_DATE)>= 7 But I am getting an error message like org.hibernate.QueryException: could not resolve property: posted_date of: questions.dao.hibernate.Questions [SELECT a FROM questions.dao.hibernate.Questions a WHERE (a.posted_date-CURRENT_DATE)>=7] Please help me. Thanks

  Read the article

• Is It Incorrect to Make Domain Objects Aware of The Data Access Layer?

  - by Noah Goodrich

  I am currently working on rewriting an application to use Data Mappers that completely abstract the database from the Domain layer. However, I am now wondering which is the better approach to handling relationships between Domain objects: Call the necessary find() method from the related data mapper directly within the domain object Write the relationship logic into the native data mapper (which is what the examples tend to do in PoEAA) and then call the native data mapper function within the domain object. Either it seems to me that in order to preserve the 'Fat Model, Skinny Controller' mantra, the domain objects have to be aware of the data mappers (whether it be their own or that they have access to the other mappers in the system). Additionally it seems that Option 2 unnecessarily complicates the data access layer as it creates table access logic across multiple data mappers instead of confining it to a single data mapper. So, is it incorrect to make the domain objects aware of the related data mappers and to call data mapper functions directly from the domain objects? Update: These are the only two solutions that I can envision to handle the issue of relations between domain objects. Any example showing a better method would be welcome.

  Read the article

• Is it a missing implementation with JPA implementation of hibernate??

  - by Jegan

  Hi all, On my way in understanding the transaction-type attribute of persistence.xml, i came across an issue / discrepency between hibernate-core and JPA-hibernate which looks weird. I am not pretty sure whether it is a missing implementation with JPA of hibernate. Let me post the comparison between the outcome of JPA implementation and the hibernate implementation of the same concept. Environment Eclipse 3.5.1 JSE v1.6.0_05 Hibernate v3.2.3 [for hibernate core] Hibernate-EntityManger v3.4.0 [for JPA] MySQL DB v5.0 Issue 1.Hibernate core package com.expt.hibernate.core; import java.io.Serializable; public final class Student implements Serializable { private int studId; private String studName; private String studEmailId; public Student(final String studName, final String studEmailId) { this.studName = studName; this.studEmailId = studEmailId; } public int getStudId() { return this.studId; } public String getStudName() { return this.studName; } public String getStudEmailId() { return this.studEmailId; } private void setStudId(int studId) { this.studId = studId; } private void setStudName(String studName) { this.studName = stuName; } private void setStudEmailId(int studEmailId) { this.studEmailId = studEmailId; } } 2. JPA implementaion of Hibernate package com.expt.hibernate.jpa; import java.io.Serializable; import javax.persistence.Column; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.Table; @Entity @Table(name = "Student_Info") public final class Student implements Serializable { @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name = "STUD_ID", length = 5) private int studId; @Column(name = "STUD_NAME", nullable = false, length = 25) private String studName; @Column(name = "STUD_EMAIL", nullable = true, length = 30) private String studEmailId; public Student(final String studName, final String studEmailId) { this.studName = studName; this.studEmailId = studEmailId; } public int getStudId() { return this.studId; } public String getStudName() { return this.studName; } public String getStudEmailId() { return this.studEmailId; } } Also, I have provided the DB configuration properties in the associated hibernate-cfg.xml [in case of hibernate core] and persistence.xml [in case of JPA (hibernate entity manager)]. create a driver and perform add a student and query for the list of students and print their details. Then the issue comes when you run the driver program. Hibernate core - output Exception in thread "main" org.hibernate.InstantiationException: No default constructor for entity: com.expt.hibernate.core.Student at org.hibernate.tuple.PojoInstantiator.instantiate(PojoInstantiator.java:84) at org.hibernate.tuple.PojoInstantiator.instantiate(PojoInstantiator.java:100) at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.AbstractEntityTuplizer.instantiate(AbstractEntityTuplizer.java:351) at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.instantiate(AbstractEntityPersister.java:3604) .... .... This exception is flashed when the driver is executed for the first time itself. JPA Hibernate - output First execution of the driver on a fresh DB provided the following output. DEBUG SQL:111 - insert into student.Student_Info (STUD_EMAIL, STUD_NAME) values (?, ?) 17:38:24,229 DEBUG SQL:111 - select student0_.STUD_ID as STUD1_0_, student0_.STUD_EMAIL as STUD2_0_, student0_.STUD_NAME as STUD3_0_ from student.Student_Info student0_ student list size == 1 1 || Jegan || [email protected] second execution of the driver provided the following output. DEBUG SQL:111 - insert into student.Student_Info (STUD_EMAIL, STUD_NAME) values (?, ?) 17:40:25,254 DEBUG SQL:111 - select student0_.STUD_ID as STUD1_0_, student0_.STUD_EMAIL as STUD2_0_, student0_.STUD_NAME as STUD3_0_ from student.Student_Info student0_ Exception in thread "main" javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.InstantiationException: No default constructor for entity: com.expt.hibernate.jpa.Student at org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.throwPersistenceException(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:614) at org.hibernate.ejb.QueryImpl.getResultList(QueryImpl.java:76) at driver.StudentDriver.main(StudentDriver.java:43) Caused by: org.hibernate.InstantiationException: No default constructor for entity: com.expt.hibernate.jpa.Student .... .... Could anyone please let me know if you have encountered this sort of inconsistency? Also, could anyone please let me know if the issue is a missing implementation with JPA-Hibernate? ~ Jegan

  Read the article

• Coldbox Security Interceptor

  - by faheem

  Hi I am new to coldbox and working on a guestbook messaging forum. does anyone know how I can apply some rule in coldbox to show edit and delete for specified users of admin or user in the edit page. I am not sure how to specify this as I already have my rules here as shown in securityRules.xml: SecurityRules.XML <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!-- Declare as many rule elements as you want, order is important Remember that the securelist can contain a list of regular expression if you want ex: All events in the user handler user\..* ex: All events .* ex: All events that start with admin ^admin If you are not using regular expression, just write the text that can be found in an event. <whitelist>ehSecurity\.dspLogin,ehSecurity\.doLogin,ehSecurity\.dspLogoff</whitelist> --> <rules> <rule> <whitelist>^entries,ehSecurity\..*,registry\..*</whitelist> <securelist></securelist> <roles>admin</roles> <permissions>read,write</permissions> <redirect>ehSecurity.dspLogin</redirect> </rule> <rule> <whitelist>^entries,ehSecurity\..*,main\..*,^registry</whitelist> <securelist></securelist> <roles>author,admin</roles> <permissions>read</permissions> <redirect>ehSecurity.dspLogin</redirect> </rule> </rules>

  Read the article

• Hibernate: Check if object exists/changed

  - by swalkner

  Assuming I have an object Person with long id String firstName String lastName String address Then I'm generating a Person-object somewhere in my application. Now I'd like to check if the person exists in the database (= firstname/lastname-combination is in the database). If not = insert it. If yes, check, if the address is the same. If not = update the address. Of course, I can do some requests (first, try to load object with firstname/lastname), then (if existing), compare the address. But isn't there a simpler, cleaner approach? If got several different classes and do not like to have so many queries. I'd like to use annotations as if to say: firstname/lastname = they're the primary key. Check for them if the object exists. address is the parameter you have to compare if it stayed the same or not. Does Hibernate/JPA (or another framework) support something like that? pseude-code: if (database.containsObject(person)) { //containing according to compound keys if (database.containsChangedObject(person)) { database.updateObject(person); } } else { database.insertObject(person); }

  Read the article

• Looking for detailed explanation of Hibernate UserType methods for mutable objects

  - by Tom

  I am creating a custom UserType class in Hibernate. The specific case is for an HL7v3 clinical document (I work in health IT). It is a mutable object and most of the documentation around the Hibernate UserType interface seems to center around immutable types. I want a better understanding of how and when the interface methods are used, specifically: assemble - why two parameters (one Serializable, one Object)? What is the use case for this method? disassemble - should I just implement this method to return a serializable form (e.g. String representation)? When and how is this method invoked? equals - is this for update? read? contention? dirty reads? What are the consequences of simply returning false in most cases? replace - I really don't understand where the three Object parameters come from, when this method is invoked, and what Hibernate expects to return, or how that return value is used. Any pointers would be appreciated. I've searched and read all I can find on the subject, but have not found much documentation at all explaining how these methods are used for mutable objects.

  Read the article

• NHibernate session management in ASP.NET MVC

  - by Kevin Pang

  I am currently playing around with the HybridSessionBuilder class found on Jeffrey Palermo's blog post: http://jeffreypalermo.com/blog/use-this-nhibernate-wrapper-to-keep-your-repository-classes-simple/ Using this class, my repository looks like this: public class UserRepository : IUserRepository { private readonly ISessionBuilder _sessionBuilder; public UserRepository(ISessionBuilder sessionBuilder) { _sessionBuilder = sessionBuilder; } public User GetByID(string userID) { using (ISession session = _sessionBuilder.GetSession()) { return session.Get<User>(userID); } } } Is this the best way to go about managing the NHibernate session / factory? I've heard things about Unit of Work and creating a session per web request and flushing it at the end. From what I can tell, my current implementation isn't doing any of this. It is basically relying on the Repository to grab the session from the session factory and use it to run the queries. Are there any pitfalls to doing database access this way?

  Read the article

• Hibernate -using Table per subclass - how to link an existing superclass object to a sibclass object

  - by Chandni

  Hi, I have a User hibernate class, Clerk class and Consumer class. All these maps to their own tables in database. The User PK also acts as Clerk's and Consumer's PK. So now my problem is that if a user is initially a Clerk, he has a record in Users table and Clerks table. If that user wants to become a consumer, I want to link that User's record to the new Consumer's record. So even if I pass the userId to the consumer's record, it treats it as a new User to be persisted and gives a duplicate_key exception. How do I tell Hiernate to link the same user object with this new Consumer object. Thanks in advance, -Chandni

  Read the article

• org.hibernate.annotations.Entity not being picked up by Hibernate 3.6

  - by user1317764

  I am using hibernate 3.6.7 I am using annotated classes. My classes were annotated with org.hibernate.annotations.Entity. Added the classes to configuration using configuration.addAnnotatedClass() method. Hibernate does not seem to pick it up. Stuff works fine if I use the standard jpa Entity annotation. What am I missing? I know that the classes have been deprecated in the Hibernate 4.x releases with the advent of newer annotations to configure stuff like dynamic-insert and dynamic-updates. I am not using any XML configuration file. I am setting up configuration with a properties file and using java apis.

  Read the article

• Should I invest time in learning about OR\M or LINQ?

  - by Peter Smith

  I'm a .NET web developer primarily who occasionally writes console applications to mine data, cleanup tasks, etc. Most of what I do winds up involving a database which I currently design via sql server management studio, using stored procedures, and query analyzer. I also create a lot of web services which are consumed via AJAX applications. Do these technologies really help you in speeding up development times? Do you still have to build the database or object code first?

  Read the article

• Putting Select Statement on Hibernate Transaction

  - by Mark Estrada

  Hi All, I have been reading the net for a while regarding Hibernate but I can seem to understand one concept regarding Transaction. On some site that I have visit, Select statements are in transaction mode like this. public List<Book> readAll() { Session session = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory() .getCurrentSession(); session.beginTransaction(); List<Book> booksList = session.createQuery("from Book").list(); session.getTransaction().commit(); return booksList; } While on some site, it does not advocate the use of transaction on Select statements public List<Book> readAll() { Session session = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory() .getCurrentSession(); List<Book> booksList = session.createQuery("from Book").list(); return booksList; } I am thinking which one should I follow. Any thoughts please? Are transactions needed on Select Statements or not? Thanks

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30  | Next Page >