Search Results

Search found 25549 results on 1022 pages for 'visual studio 2010'.

Page 231/1022 | < Previous Page | 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238  | Next Page >

  • SQL Server using SSH-tunnel from Visual Studio

    - by pbt
    Hi, I recently contacted a web host regarding support for external database access to a Microsoft SQL Server database included in a package they offer. They replied saying that it is only possible with an SSH-tunnel. Is it possible to connect to a SQL Server database in Visual Studio using an SSH-tunnel? It is important for me to be able to access the database from my local machine (for debugging, generating LINQ classes, editing tables, etc). Or, how should I go about working with their database?

    Read the article

  • issue with c# xml documentation

    - by galford13x
    I have the following comment. /// <summary> /// MSDN Time Format compatible with <see cref="DateTime.ParseExact(string, string, IFormatProvider)"/> /// </summary> /// <returns>MSDN Time Format compatible with <see cref="DateTime.ParseExact(string, string, IFormatProvider)"/></returns> but I'm not sure why I receive the following warning Warning 7 XML comment on 'MSLab.DateTime.SystemTimeProvider.GetTimeFormat()' has cref attribute 'DateTime.ParseExact(string, string, IFormatProvider)' that could not be resolved F:\My Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\MSLab\trunk\MSLab\MSLab\DateTime\SystemTimeProvider.cs 110 57 MSLab

    Read the article

  • Obtaining Nearby Wifi In C Using VS2010

    - by WizardsSleeve
    Hi All, I am trying to identify a method for obtaining nearby wifi access points using C in Windows. I am coding in Visual Studio 2010. I have read the necessary documentation but am lacking in guidance on how to implement code that would accomplish this. I am specifically interested in obtaining the MAC address of nearby access points or at a minimum the MAC address of the currently connected Wifi access point. Is it possible to do this using WMI in Windows, specifically on Windows XP SP3 and later? Any pointers on how to do this are greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Visual C# 2008 Control to set a path.

    - by Eyla
    Greetings, What control in Visual C# 2008 would allow me to set a path and get the value of that path. For example: I want the user to click a button then select a path where he/she would do the operation such as save a file in selected path.

    Read the article

  • Prevent debugging projects that are added as reference in Visual Studio

    - by DSWD
    I have a project that is auto generated. This project is referenced by my web app in visual studio. When i step through the code in debug mode the code from this project gets stepped into. Is there a way I can skip this code in debug mode. I can't use System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute since the code will get replaced every time my datasource changes. Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Obtaining Nearby Wifi In C

    - by WizardsSleeve
    I am trying to identify a method for obtaining nearby wifi access points using C in Windows. I am coding in Visual Studio 2010. I have read the necessary documentation but am lacking in guidance on how to implement code that would accomplish this. I am specifically interested in obtaining the MAC address of nearby access points or at a minimum the MAC address of the currently connected Wifi access point. Is it possible to do this using WMI in Windows, specifically on Windows XP SP3 and later? Any pointers on how to do this are greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Recursively expand collapsed regions in Visual Studio? (outlining)

    - by Kurt Margenau
    I'm using Visual Studio 2008, and it doesn't seem like once I have collapsed all the regions, I can expand ALL levels of a certain region with one click/command. Notepad++ has this functionality when you ctrl + click on a collapsed region, it recursively expands all regions within it. It's awesome. Anyone know of a plugin or macro that has this functionality? I'm using a custom language, aka not C++/C# btw thanks!

    Read the article

  • The dynamic Type in C# Simplifies COM Member Access from Visual FoxPro

    - by Rick Strahl
    I’ve written quite a bit about Visual FoxPro interoperating with .NET in the past both for ASP.NET interacting with Visual FoxPro COM objects as well as Visual FoxPro calling into .NET code via COM Interop. COM Interop with Visual FoxPro has a number of problems but one of them at least got a lot easier with the introduction of dynamic type support in .NET. One of the biggest problems with COM interop has been that it’s been really difficult to pass dynamic objects from FoxPro to .NET and get them properly typed. The only way that any strong typing can occur in .NET for FoxPro components is via COM type library exports of Visual FoxPro components. Due to limitations in Visual FoxPro’s type library support as well as the dynamic nature of the Visual FoxPro language where few things are or can be described in the form of a COM type library, a lot of useful interaction between FoxPro and .NET required the use of messy Reflection code in .NET. Reflection is .NET’s base interface to runtime type discovery and dynamic execution of code without requiring strong typing. In FoxPro terms it’s similar to EVALUATE() functionality albeit with a much more complex API and corresponiding syntax. The Reflection APIs are fairly powerful, but they are rather awkward to use and require a lot of code. Even with the creation of wrapper utility classes for common EVAL() style Reflection functionality dynamically access COM objects passed to .NET often is pretty tedious and ugly. Let’s look at a simple example. In the following code I use some FoxPro code to dynamically create an object in code and then pass this object to .NET. An alternative to this might also be to create a new object on the fly by using SCATTER NAME on a database record. How the object is created is inconsequential, other than the fact that it’s not defined as a COM object – it’s a pure FoxPro object that is passed to .NET. Here’s the code: *** Create .NET COM InstanceloNet = CREATEOBJECT('DotNetCom.DotNetComPublisher') *** Create a Customer Object Instance (factory method) loCustomer = GetCustomer() loCustomer.Name = "Rick Strahl" loCustomer.Company = "West Wind Technologies" loCustomer.creditLimit = 9999999999.99 loCustomer.Address.StreetAddress = "32 Kaiea Place" loCustomer.Address.Phone = "808 579-8342" loCustomer.Address.Email = "[email protected]" *** Pass Fox Object and echo back values ? loNet.PassRecordObject(loObject) RETURN FUNCTION GetCustomer LOCAL loCustomer, loAddress loCustomer = CREATEOBJECT("EMPTY") ADDPROPERTY(loCustomer,"Name","") ADDPROPERTY(loCustomer,"Company","") ADDPROPERTY(loCUstomer,"CreditLimit",0.00) ADDPROPERTY(loCustomer,"Entered",DATETIME()) loAddress = CREATEOBJECT("Empty") ADDPROPERTY(loAddress,"StreetAddress","") ADDPROPERTY(loAddress,"Phone","") ADDPROPERTY(loAddress,"Email","") ADDPROPERTY(loCustomer,"Address",loAddress) RETURN loCustomer ENDFUNC Now prior to .NET 4.0 you’d have to access this object passed to .NET via Reflection and the method code to do this would looks something like this in the .NET component: public string PassRecordObject(object FoxObject) { // *** using raw Reflection string Company = (string) FoxObject.GetType().InvokeMember( "Company", BindingFlags.GetProperty,null, FoxObject,null); // using the easier ComUtils wrappers string Name = (string) ComUtils.GetProperty(FoxObject,"Name"); // Getting Address object – then getting child properties object Address = ComUtils.GetProperty(FoxObject,"Address");    string Street = (string) ComUtils.GetProperty(FoxObject,"StreetAddress"); // using ComUtils 'Ex' functions you can use . Syntax     string StreetAddress = (string) ComUtils.GetPropertyEx(FoxObject,"AddressStreetAddress"); return Name + Environment.NewLine + Company + Environment.NewLine + StreetAddress + Environment.NewLine + " FOX"; } Note that the FoxObject is passed in as type object which has no specific type. Since the object doesn’t exist in .NET as a type signature the object is passed without any specific type information as plain non-descript object. To retrieve a property the Reflection APIs like Type.InvokeMember or Type.GetProperty().GetValue() etc. need to be used. I made this code a little simpler by using the Reflection Wrappers I mentioned earlier but even with those ComUtils calls the code is pretty ugly requiring passing the objects for each call and casting each element. Using .NET 4.0 Dynamic Typing makes this Code a lot cleaner Enter .NET 4.0 and the dynamic type. Replacing the input parameter to the .NET method from type object to dynamic makes the code to access the FoxPro component inside of .NET much more natural: public string PassRecordObjectDynamic(dynamic FoxObject) { // *** using raw Reflection string Company = FoxObject.Company; // *** using the easier ComUtils class string Name = FoxObject.Name; // *** using ComUtils 'ex' functions to use . Syntax string Address = FoxObject.Address.StreetAddress; return Name + Environment.NewLine + Company + Environment.NewLine + Address + Environment.NewLine + " FOX"; } As you can see the parameter is of type dynamic which as the name implies performs Reflection lookups and evaluation on the fly so all the Reflection code in the last example goes away. The code can use regular object ‘.’ syntax to reference each of the members of the object. You can access properties and call methods this way using natural object language. Also note that all the type casts that were required in the Reflection code go away – dynamic types like var can infer the type to cast to based on the target assignment. As long as the type can be inferred by the compiler at compile time (ie. the left side of the expression is strongly typed) no explicit casts are required. Note that although you get to use plain object syntax in the code above you don’t get Intellisense in Visual Studio because the type is dynamic and thus has no hard type definition in .NET . The above example calls a .NET Component from VFP, but it also works the other way around. Another frequent scenario is an .NET code calling into a FoxPro COM object that returns a dynamic result. Assume you have a FoxPro COM object returns a FoxPro Cursor Record as an object: DEFINE CLASS FoxData AS SESSION OlePublic cAppStartPath = "" FUNCTION INIT THIS.cAppStartPath = ADDBS( JustPath(Application.ServerName) ) SET PATH TO ( THIS.cAppStartpath ) ENDFUNC FUNCTION GetRecord(lnPk) LOCAL loCustomer SELECT * FROM tt_Cust WHERE pk = lnPk ; INTO CURSOR TCustomer IF _TALLY < 1 RETURN NULL ENDIF SCATTER NAME loCustomer MEMO RETURN loCustomer ENDFUNC ENDDEFINE If you call this from a .NET application you can now retrieve this data via COM Interop and cast the result as dynamic to simplify the data access of the dynamic FoxPro type that was created on the fly: int pk = 0; int.TryParse(Request.QueryString["id"],out pk); // Create Fox COM Object with Com Callable Wrapper FoxData foxData = new FoxData(); dynamic foxRecord = foxData.GetRecord(pk); string company = foxRecord.Company; DateTime entered = foxRecord.Entered; This code looks simple and natural as it should be – heck you could write code like this in days long gone by in scripting languages like ASP classic for example. Compared to the Reflection code that previously was necessary to run similar code this is much easier to write, understand and maintain. For COM interop and Visual FoxPro operation dynamic type support in .NET 4.0 is a huge improvement and certainly makes it much easier to deal with FoxPro code that calls into .NET. Regardless of whether you’re using COM for calling Visual FoxPro objects from .NET (ASP.NET calling a COM component and getting a dynamic result returned) or whether FoxPro code is calling into a .NET COM component from a FoxPro desktop application. At one point or another FoxPro likely ends up passing complex dynamic data to .NET and for this the dynamic typing makes coding much cleaner and more readable without having to create custom Reflection wrappers. As a bonus the dynamic runtime that underlies the dynamic type is fairly efficient in terms of making Reflection calls especially if members are repeatedly accessed. © Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2010Posted in COM  FoxPro  .NET  CSharp  

    Read the article

  • VS.NET 2010 SP1, Win 7, Parallels, and a MBP&ndash;Hell, my friends&hellip;HELL!

    - by D'Arcy Lussier
    LightSwitch Beta 2 is out. That’s how all this started. All I wanted was to install it on my MBP’s Win7 Parallels VM. But as I’m finding with running a Win7 VM on a MBP, nothing is as easy as it should be. First my MBP froze during the SP1 installation. Not my VM crashing, the entire machine freezing…no mouse, nothing. Had to do a hard reset. BLECH. Then we’re back and I try to re-install SP1 (since the first try obviously failed). I get met with a dialog asking me where silverlight_sdk.msi was. It was *nowhere*! So I hit the net and download it from Microsoft’s site. Unfortunately, it only downloads an exe and not the individual files which would include the msi. Here’s what I did: - Download the tools for Silverlight 4 (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=b3deb194-ca86-4fb6-a716-b67c2604a139&displaylang=en) - Run it, but don’t hit the install or next button when the dialog comes up - Look in your file structure for a folder with a weird name…bunch of numbers and letters. This is a temp folder that the exe creates and dumps all the necessary setup files into, and clears away after its done. - Inside this folder you’ll find the silverlight_sdk.msi (hooray!). Just copy it to a different location on the C drive. You can then cancel installation. Ok, so that takes care of that…but then running the SP1 installer I get hit with *another* dialog asking for the WCF RIA Services SP1 msi. Now it looks like this MSI is part of the Silverlight Tools package because you’ll see the MSI, but the VS.NET 2010 SP1 installer will thumb its nose at this unworthy msi…for whatever reason. So instead, go here: http://www.silverlight.net/getstarted/riaservices/ …and click on the “Install WCF Ria Services Sp1…” option. This downloads the msi, which you should save to your C drive and direct the VS.NET 2010 SP1 installer to. Then, if you’ve done all that, been good all year, and not made any little children cry, you *might* just be able to install VS.NET 2010 SP1 on your Parallels VM. If you were playing that “Take a shot every time he writes VS.NET 2010 Sp1” drinking game, then you’re drunk…which is a better place to be than where I am right now: watching the installation progress bar slowly creep to completion, hoping there’s no more surprises in store. D

    Read the article

  • Symantec publie son bilan 2010 et ses prévisions pour 2011, plus d'exploits de failles zero-day et d'attaques sensibles

    Symantec fait son bilan 2010 et donne ses perspectives pour 2011 : plus d'attaques contre les infrastructures vitales et d'exploits de failles zero-day Symantec publie aujourd'hui ses perspectives en termes de sécurité informatique pour 2011, grâce à l'observation des phénomènes apparus ou s'étant développés en 2010, et s'appuyant sur son réseau de plus de 240.000 capteurs dans le monde entier. Première tendance lourde : « L'hactivisme » - La fréquence des attaques contre les infrastructures vitales va augmenter et les fournisseurs de services vont réagir, mais les gouvernements risquent d'être plus lents Les pirates ont certainement été attentifs aux effets produits par la menace Stuxnet sur les secteurs d'...

    Read the article

  • L'adoption de Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 devrait s'accélérer en 2011 selon Mimecast, mais la migration est vue comme délicate

    L'adoption de Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 devrait s'accélérer en 2011 Selon Mimecast, mais la migration est vue comme délicate Un sondage publié récemment montre que la migration vers Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 va fortement d'accélérer dans les prochains mois. La solution de messagerie d'entreprise de Microsoft, dont le Service Pack 1 est disponible depuis déjà quelques mois a fait l'objet d'une étude menée par Mimecast, fournisseur des services de messagerie unifiée. L'étude révèle que 51,9 % de...

    Read the article

  • Apple publie une mise à jour de sécurité qui colmate la faille mise à jour lors du Pwn2Own 2010

    Apple a publié une mise à jour de sécurité pour Mac OS X Leopard et Mac OS X Snow Leopard, que ce soit la version normale ou la version Serveur. Cette mise à jour de sécurité colmate la faille que Charlie Miller avait mis à jour lors du Pwn2own 2010 qui s'était tenu fin mars. Voir http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4131 pour plus d'information sur la mise à jour sécurité 2010-003 Voir également Jusqu'ici, aucun navigateur ne résiste aux attaques des experts en séc...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Office 2010 est en pré-commande, sortie officielle le 12 mai pour la nouvelle suite de Mic

    Mise à jour du 19/04/10 [Les commentaires de cette mise à jour commencent ici] Microsoft Office 2010 est déjà en pré-commande Sortie officielle le 12 mai pour la nouvelle suite de Microsoft très axée Cloud et collaboration Microsft Office 2010 est disponible en pré-commande en trois versions : Famille et Etudiant (139 Euros), Famille et Petite Entreprise (379 Euros), Professoionnelle (699 Euros) - lire par ailleurs "

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Office 2010 est en pré-commande, sortie officielle le 12 mai pour la nouvelle suite de Mic

    Mise à jour du 19/04/10 [Les commentaires de cette mise à jour commencent ici] Microsoft Office 2010 est déjà en pré-commande Sortie officielle le 12 mai pour la nouvelle suite de Microsoft très axée Cloud et collaboration Microsft Office 2010 est disponible en pré-commande en trois versions : Famille et Etudiant (139 Euros), Famille et Petite Entreprise (379 Euros), Professoionnelle (699 Euros) - lire par ailleurs "

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238  | Next Page >