Search Results

Search found 2859 results on 115 pages for 'apt'.

Page 24/115 | < Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >

  • Trouble getting latest version of Git

    - by TheMethod
    I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. I'm looking at using git as source control for personal projects and Github as a remote repository. I was having trouble pushing a commit to my remote github repo getting the following error message: The requested URL returned error: 403 while accessing https://github.com/Jstall/helloworld.git/info/refs When I did some digging I found that the problem could be me not having the latest version of Git. When I did a --version I found that I have version 1.7.0.4 locally. So I tried to update git using: sudo apt-get install git but get the following error: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package git is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package git has no installation candidate I've tried running: sudo apt-get update and trying again but it didn't seem to make a difference. I'm not sure if it's relevant but I'm also getting a couple of 404's when I run update: Err http://wine.budgetdedicated.com edgy/main Packages 404 Not Found Fetched 4,117B in 0s (5,142B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/edgy/universe/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt/dists/edgy/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found I'm not sure when I should try next. Could anyone suggest a course of action to get this resolved? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks much!

    Read the article

  • dpkg broken while upgrading Debian Etch to Lenny

    - by artvolk
    Good day! While trying to recover a box to lenny it seems I've broken things. It upgrades libc and glib after that dpkg seems to be broken. I can run apt-get, but it gets segmentation fault from dpkg: # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 316 not upgraded. 9 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. /bin/sh: line 1: 4606 Segmentation fault /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault. I can login via SSH but even ls is not working: # ls Segmentation fault Is there anything I can do remotelly via SSH? # ldd /bin/ls linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0xb7fc8000) libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0xb7fc2000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0xb7fac000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7e51000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e3f000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fd8000) libattr.so.1 => /lib/libattr.so.1 (0xb7e3b000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e37000) libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0xb7df6000) It seems I've temporary fixed it with: # touch /etc/ld.so.nohwcap From here: http://saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com/blog/archive/2005/08/_etc_ld_so_nohwcap.html

    Read the article

  • Installing a .deb file manually?

    - by stef
    apt-get install gitosis --fix-missing on my Linode still leads to a 404 (Failed to fetch http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gitosis/gitosis_0.2+20080825-2_all.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 130.89.148.12 80] ) . The correct file location seems to be http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gitosis/gitosis_0.2+20090917-11_all.deb Is there any way I can install this without apt-get, or point apt-get in the right direction somehow? Several other packages on my Debian Linode also point to 404, both from command line and virtualmin. EDIT: Machine details Debian 5.0 64bit (Latest 2.6 (2.6.39.1-x86_64-linode19)) EDIT2 My sources list # main repo deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main contrib non-free deb-src http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main contrib non-free # contrib & non-free repos #deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny contrib non-free #deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny contrib non-free #deb http://security.debian.org/debian/ lenny/updates contrib non-free #deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian/ lenny/updates contrib non-free deb http://software.virtualmin.com/gpl/debian/ virtualmin-lenny main deb http://software.virtualmin.com/gpl/debian/ virtualmin-universal main

    Read the article

  • How to create a init.d script for openssh-server which was compiled and installed from source using configure + make + make install?

    - by Patrick L
    I have installed openssh-server in my Ubuntu PC using apt-get install openssh-server. The version is 5.9. Now, I would like to compile and install openssh-server version 6.2 from source codes. I have successfully downloaded the source codes, and run the following commands: ./configure make make install I found that the new version of openssh-server was installed into /usr/local/sbin/. The old version of openssh-server is in /usr/sbin/. I found that the service script in /etc/init.d/ssh is still pointing to /usr/sbin/. And the old openssh-server (v5.9) is still running. How can I replace the old openssh-server with the new openssh-server that I have just compiled and installed? How can I create a init.d script to start and stop the new openssh-server that I've compiled from source manually? How to start the new openssh-server on boot? When I install openssh-server using apt-get install, the config files will be installed into /etc/ssh/. If I compile and install it from source, where is the config file? If I compiled openssh-server from source, but I install openssh-client package using apt-get install, will there be any config files conflict? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Problems compiling scangearmp

    - by maat
    I have already installed some missing packages, but i still get that error. Can anyone help me identify what is missing ? Thanks a lot psr@psr-EasyNote-TM85:~/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp$ make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/psr/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp' Making all in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/psr/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp/po' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/psr/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp/po' Making all in backend make[2]: Entering directory `/home/psr/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp/backend' /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I./include -DV_MAJOR=2 -DV_MINOR=1 -O2 -D__GIMP_PLUGIN_ENABLE__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -MT libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.Tpo -c -o libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.lo `test -f 'canon_mfp_tools.c' || echo './'`canon_mfp_tools.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I./include -DV_MAJOR=2 -DV_MINOR=1 -O2 -D__GIMP_PLUGIN_ENABLE__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -MT libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.Tpo -c canon_mfp_tools.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.o canon_mfp_tools.c:40:17: fatal error: usb.h: No such file or directory #include ^ compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [libsane_canon_mfp_la-canon_mfp_tools.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/psr/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp/backend' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/psr/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp' make: *** [all] Error 2 psr@psr-EasyNote-TM85:~/Downloads/scangearmp-source-2.10-1/scangearmp$

    Read the article

  • How can I upgrade to 10.10 from 10.10 beta

    - by n179911
    Can you please tell me how can I upgrade to ubuntu 10.10 release from ubuntu 10.10 beta? I have go to update manager, it keeps saying there is no update. And what I go to synaptic package manager, I see this error: W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://extras.ubuntu.com maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 16126D3A3E5C1192 W: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

    Read the article

  • Problem installing eclipse-platform in fresh Ubuntu 10.10

    - by pablo
    I am trying to install the eclipse-platform package in a new Ubuntu 10.10 and I am getting the following error (via the Ubuntu software center): Failed to fetch http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libs/libservlet2.4-java/libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-12_all.deb 404 Not Found Browsing to the mentioned URL, I can obviously verify that the .deb file in question is missing. Is the package broken, or is it just the NZ mirror?

    Read the article

  • Cannot apply unity --reset after modifying files

    - by Alex Cline
    So I have an idea of what I did wrong, I am just not sure how to fix it. I used the Unity Glass mod: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/07/unity-glass-offers-refined-new-look-for-the-unity-launcher After removing it, I cannot reset unity and it does not work. Even after purging Unity and reinstalling it, I cannot seem to replace the missing files. $unity --reset WARNING: Unity currently default profile, so switching to metacity while resetting the values unity-panel-service: no process found Checking if settings need to be migrated ...no Checking if internal files need to be migrated ...no Backend : gconf Integration : true Profile : unity Adding plugins Initializing core options...done compiz (core) - Warn: failed to receive ConfigureNotify event on 0x1c00027 Initializing composite options...done Initializing opengl options...done Initializing decor options...done Initializing vpswitch options...done Initializing snap options...done Initializing mousepoll options...done Initializing resize options...done Initializing place options...done Initializing move options...done Initializing wall options...done Initializing grid options...done I/O warning : failed to load external entity "/home/arcline/.compiz/session/10b624e5c8f98c5325134625607758338300000051770001" Initializing session options...done Initializing gnomecompat options...done Initializing animation options...done Initializing fade options...done Initializing unitymtgrabhandles options...done Initializing workarounds options...done Initializing scale options...done compiz (expo) - Warn: failed to bind image to texture Initializing expo options...done Initializing ezoom options...done (compiz:7038): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gnome-panel.css:28:11: Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'. (compiz:7038): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_client_add_dir: assertion `gconf_valid_key (dirname, NULL)' failed Segmentation fault (core dumped)

    Read the article

  • Tracking the popularity of a package over time?

    - by DoR
    Is there any software or website that allows the user to view a graph of how popular a particular package is? The popcon.ubuntu.com site has raw information on how many people (who have installed popularity-contest) have installed a particular package, but it would be interesting to see how a package's popularity changes over time. I remember using a website that graphed this, but I don't know if it still exist.

    Read the article

  • Apps missing in Software Centre

    - by Hahn Do
    I'm using Elementary OS Luna beta 1, based on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise. I used to used Quantal, as I remember there were roughly 68000 apps. Massive commercial apps, and the banner on top shows new hot apps all the time. Now I switch to Elementary because Compiz sucks with Nvidia. However, Software Centre now only has 41000 apps. No commercial apps, no 3rd party apps. I'm pretty sure I have all the sources enabled: My sources.list: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1396213/

    Read the article

  • Partitioning During Installation, Reinstalling Ubuntu, Backup donwloaded Repositories

    - by user209645
    I am new to Ubuntu and I have just finished installing 13.10 amd64 on my PC. This will replace my Windows 7 as my only OS. I just want to clarify some issues that've been bugging me. I tried reading posts with the same topics but I just can't wrap my head to it yet. I partitioned my 80GB drive into: /root: 30GB (sorry for the confusion, I actually meant /) /home: 40GB /var : 3GB swap : 4GB (2GB of mem) Please correct me if I'm wrong about these: All of the users' documents are saved in their respective folders in /home. But say I want to clean install (format) Ubuntu, I don't need to make backups of /home and /var as they are on separate partitions. But when re-installing, do I just choose /root and format and it will recognize all the partitions (not making another /home and /var inside /root)? Downloaded packages (from all the repositories) and all their dependencies are saved in /var. So after re-installing on the same PC (assuming I'm offline), it will just use the latest updates in /var if I choose to update? And if all the installed apps and their dependents are all in there, all I need to do is re-install them without encountering errors? I have also read that you can back them up using aptoncd and then adding the DVD to the sources. So if I download all the high ranking apps using Synaptic, could I then have an all-in-one DVD installer? 30GB for / is excessive because the bulk of files will either be in /home (personal, downloads, music, videos) or /var (updates, packages, installed apps)? Please excuse me for asking such a question but I really want to explore and learn more.

    Read the article

  • Script to only execute during first install of a package

    - by Jeroen
    I recently started packaging up some of my software and publishing it on Launchpad. The installation and removal works fine, but upgrading the package form one version to the next version is problematic. The problem is that there are some scripts that only need to run during the first installation of the package. These scripts populate the DB, create a user, etc. They are currently called in the package.postinst configure) section. However this results in them being called during an upgrade as well as shown in the diagram. Is there a way to include a maintainer script in a .deb package that only executes during the first installation of the package and not during an upgrade? Or what would be an elegant way to include some initial setup scripts in a .deb package?

    Read the article

  • Synaptic returns error

    - by donvoldy666
    I get the following error message when I run synaptic and I can't install any programs SystemError: W:Ignoring file 'getdeb.list.bck' in directory '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension, W:Duplicate sources.list entry 'http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), W:Duplicate sources.list entry 'http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ ' precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), W:Duplicate sources.list entry 'http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), W:Duplicate sources.list entry ' 'http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu'/ precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), W:Duplicate sources.list entry' 'http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), W:Duplicate sources.list entry 'http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), W:Duplicate sources.list entry 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-security/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpad.net_ubuntu-mozilla-security_ppa_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages), E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/packages.rssowl.org_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_i18n_Translation-en, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. I'm new to Linux so please help me out .

    Read the article

  • Retain only dependencies of a given package

    - by Karthik
    I am trying to have a minimal version of Ubuntu, having only those packages necessary to run mininet. So, I would like a solution, where I would be able to uninstall all the packages from the system, except those that are needed to run mininet. A much more preferable solution would be to be able to create a new ISO, with mininet and all it's dependencies. Is there any program out there which is already capable of this? If not please guide me on how I can solve my problem? Note: I need to retain not only the direct dependencies of mininet, but also dependencies of dependencies and so on. The final system should be able to run mininet without a hitch.

    Read the article

  • Post-retirement plans for Ruby package in Precise 12.04LTS?

    - by Alexandr Kurilin
    Now that Ruby 1.8.7 is officially retired, is it at all possible that the default ruby package in precise might be updated all the way up to 2.0? I understand that backporting is generally not done with Ubuntu releases for concerns of breaking people, but in this case we're dealing with a deprecated package that might either already have security issues, or have more of them discovered in the future without any chance of them being fixed. What's the plan? Will 12.04 march on with 1.8.7?

    Read the article

  • Release upgrade crashes with "W:Failed to fetch http://host/debian/dists/oneiric/Release.gpg"

    - by Nolan Dillard
    My update manager told me that it has not checked for updates in the past 18 days, so I clicked the "check" button. It works just fine until a certain point where it says "Downloading release". The loading bar moves across the screen for a while on that message, then it just stops and says to check my Internet connection. I am fairly certain that my Internet is fine, as I can do anything else that I have tried, including installing software over the Internet. I clicked on "Details" and this is what turned up: Log

    Read the article

  • While installing wine - got Package 'wine1.5' has no installation candidate

    - by Shreyash Agrawal
    I am new to ubunto hence not aware about basics of using ubunto. I wanted to install rar password cracker for which I ran the .exe file which gave me following error : 'An error occurred while loading the archive'. Then I came to know that after installing wine, it will be possible to run my .exe file. But when I try to install wine from 'Ubuntu Software Center', i am getting another error saying 'Package dependencies cannot be resolved'. I am stuck now. Kindly help. I am using ubuntu 12.04 LTS

    Read the article

  • How do I resolve unmet dependencies?

    - by jrg
    How do I resolve unmet package dependencies? occasionally, when I'm installing stuff, I get an error like the following: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: package1 : Depends: package2 (>= 1.8) but 1.7.5-1ubuntu1 is to be installed E: Broken packages How can I resolve it?

    Read the article

  • Packages are not available under 13.04?

    - by Sven
    I have a small problem with installing packages under Ubuntu 13.04. Yesterday I wanted to install "pdfshuffler" (https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/raring/pdfshuffler/). If I go to the Ubuntu Software Center and look for "pdfshuffler" there is one item in the list (the package I want to install). When I click once on this item, the install button does not appear. If I then on furter information a error message appears telling me that there is no package called pdfshuffler in my package sources. I tried to install other packages like Eclipse or Supertux but nothing works. Why can't Ubuntu find these packages? Best regards, Sven...

    Read the article

  • Digikam unmet dependencies

    - by miel
    Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: digikam : Depends: libkface1 (>= 1.0~digikam2.9.0) but it is not going to be installed Recommends: kipi-plugins but it is not going to be installed Recommends: mplayerthumbs but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

    Read the article

  • iscsitarget suddenly broken after upgrade of the 12.04 Hardware Stack

    - by RapidWebs
    After an upgrade to the latest Hardware Stack using Ubuntu 12.04, my iscsi service is not longer operational. The error from the service is such: FATAL: Module iscsi_trgt not found. I have learned that I might need to reinstall the package iscsitarget-dkms. this package builds a driver or something during installation, from source. During this build process, it reports and error, and now has also broke my package manager. Here is the relevant output: Building module: cleaning build area.... make KERNELRELEASE=3.13.0-34-generic -C /lib/modules/3.13.0-34-generic/build M=/var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build........(bad exit status: 2) Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.13.0-34-generic (i686) Consult /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/make.log for more information. Errors were encountered while processing: iscsitarget E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) and this is the information provided by make.log: or iscsitarget-1.4.20.2 for kernel 3.13.0-34-generic (i686) Fri Aug 15 22:07:15 EDT 2014 make: Entering directory /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-34-generic LD /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/built-in.o LD /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/built-in.o CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/tio.o CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/iscsi.o CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/nthread.o CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/wthread.o /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/wthread.c: In function ‘worker_thread’: /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/wthread.c:73:28: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/wthread.c:74:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_io_context’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] /var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/wthread.c:74:21: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: * [/var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel/wthread.o] Error 1 make[1]: * [/var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build/kernel] Error 2 make: * [module/var/lib/dkms/iscsitarget/1.4.20.2/build] Error 2 make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-34-generic' I am at a loss on how to resolve this issue. any help would be appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Install a different version of a package

    - by Michael Wiles
    I'm running lucid server and have installed tomcat. The version it installed is 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.6. Is this the version I'm tied to? Is it possible to install a more recent version? The one available from maverick is 6.0.28. Maybe I can add a source to provide my lucid install with this version? In the package manager user interface I can "force version". Is it possible to force version from command line alternative as well?

    Read the article

  • Storing deb packages on local media

    - by Saeid87
    Is there a way to store deb packages (all or a specific version of package) on a local media (dvd, usb etc...) so later I would be able to install those packages on a PC which does not have Internet connection? For example, these are the packages that I want to install on a PC which doesn't have Internet connection: # TinyOS MSP430 GCC Compiler Repository # Version 4.6.3 deb http://tinyprod.net/repos/debian squeeze main deb http://tinyprod.net/repos/debian msp430-46 main # TinyOS version 2.1.2 deb http://tinyos.stanford.edu/tinyos/dists/ubuntu lucid main

    Read the article

  • Apache still running after uninstalling

    - by Ruslan Osipov
    I am trying to uninstall apache to install nginx, but it doesn't seem to work. $ ps aux | grep httpd root 22348 0.0 0.2 167252 8864 ? Ss 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL apache 22353 0.0 0.1 167624 6088 ? S 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL apache 22354 0.0 0.1 167252 5292 ? S 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL apache 22355 0.0 0.1 167252 5052 ? S 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL apache 22356 0.0 0.1 167252 5052 ? S 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL apache 22357 0.0 0.1 167252 5052 ? S 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL apache 22797 0.0 0.1 167252 5052 ? S 14:38 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DSSL 1003 22883 0.0 0.0 9388 884 pts/1 S+ 14:46 0:00 grep httpd $ which apache2 $ dpkg -S apache bash-completion: /etc/bash_completion.d/apache2ctl apparmor: /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apache2-common $ dpkg -S `which httpd` dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/sbin/httpd. The package seem to be uninstalled, but the processes are still running. And /usr/bin/httpd is still there. Any hints?

    Read the article

  • Where can I find the supported way to deploy hadoop on precise?

    - by Jeff McCarrell
    I want to set up a small (6 node) hadoop/hive/pig cluster. I see the work in the juju space on charms; however, the current status of deploying a single charm per node will not work for me. I see ServerTeam Hadoop which talks about re-packaging the bigtop packages. The cloudera CDH3 installation guide talks about Maverick and Lucid, but not precise. What am I missing? Is there a straight forward way to deploy hadoop/hive/pig on 6 nodes that does not involve building from tarballs?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >