Search Results

Search found 29925 results on 1197 pages for 'version independence'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 24/1197 | < Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >

  • WebM dans Firefox, le nouveau codec vidéo open-source fait son apparition dans une version développe

    Mise à jour du 11/06/10 WebM dans Firefox Le nouveau codec vidéo open-source fait son apparition dans une version développeur du navigateur Jusqu'ici tout le monde était d'accord (sauf Apple) au sujet du WebM, le nouveau codec open-source issu du VP8 de Google. Mais une question de licence (lire par ailleurs) avait posé quelques problèmes pour le début de son implémentation dans les navigateurs. Ces problèmes sont aujourd'hui et réglés et Mozilla tient p...

    Read the article

  • [News] Visifire pour Silverlight en version 3.0

    Disponible gratuitement sur CodePlex, Visifire est une biblioth?que de contr?les graphiques pour Silverlight et WPF. La version 3.0.9 vient d'?tre publi?e, une d?mo est disponible sur le site de Visifire : "Visifire is a set of open source data visualization components - powered by Microsoft Silverlight and WPF. With Visifire you can create and embed visually stunning animated Charts within minutes. Visifire is easy to use and independent of the server side technology. "

    Read the article

  • ZeroTurnaround s'apprête à sortir la version 3.0 de JRebel un outil de productivité pour les dévelop

    Bonjour, La version 3.0 de JRebel est prévue pour le 16 avril. Présentation succincte de JRebel (anciennement JavaRebel) : Citation: L'outil JRebel permet d'améliorer la productivité du développement Java. Il se présente sous la forme d'un agent pour la JVM qui permet le remplacement à chaud du bytecode des classes de l'application. Par conséquent, une grande partie des modifications de code peut être prise en compte par l'application sans nécessiter de redémarrer cette dernière. ...

    Read the article

  • Firefox pour Windows 8 : premier build disponible, une pré-version encore en chantier mais déjà fonctionnelle

    Firefox Metro se concrétise Mozilla publie les images d'un premier prototype pour Windows 8 Mise à jour du 03/04/2012 Le port de Firefox sur l'environnement Metro de Windows 8 se confirme. Quelques jours seulement après la confirmation des plans de développement d'une version de Firefox pour Windows 8, la fondation Mozilla livre déjà les premiers résultats de ses travaux. L'organisme vient de publier les images d'un prototype basé sur le code source de Fennec (Firefox pour mobile) et le langage d'interface utilisateur XUL. [IMG]http://rdonfack.developpez.com/images/metro-startf.jpg[/IMG...

    Read the article

  • Google prévoit d'intégrer QuickOffice à Chrome OS, l'outil déjà disponible sur Chromebook en version développeur

    L'édition des documents Quickoffice dans Chrome bientôt possible Google porte ses outils de bureautique dans le navigateur grâce à Native ClientAprès l'intégration de Quickoffice aux Google Apps, le géant de la recherche travaille sur le port de sa suite d'outils bureautiques mobiles sur Chrome OS et Chrome.La société aurait dévoilé ces jours le nouvel ordinateur Chromebook Pixel, avec une version de Chrome OS qui dispose d'une partie des applications Quickoffice.Le port de Quickoffice sur Chrome a été possible grâce à l'utilisation de Native Client. Native Client est une technologie de type sandbox (bac à sable), qui permet d'exécuter des applications écrites en C/C++ à l'intérieur d'un navig...

    Read the article

  • New Version of Sandcastle - 2.7.0.0

    - by TATWORTH
    There is a new version of Sandcastle at http://sandcastlestyles.codeplex.com/This is a free tool for producing help files from the XML documentation within C# or VB.NET code.This is a guided installer that prompts you to install the correct components in the correct order.The reason why the download is at http://sandcastlestyles.codeplex.com/ instead of http://sandcastle.codeplex.com/releases/view/47665 is discussed at http://sandcastle.codeplex.com/discussions/288079

    Read the article

  • RDA version 4.28 released

    - by THE
    Oracle proudly presents: RDA 4.28  This version of RDA comes with a new HCVE rule set (pre installation checks) Doc ID 1435695.1 now alsocollects Calc Manager Information Enjoy a faster resolution and clear communication about what Software is installed, the logs retrieved and have Tech Support react faster to the issue at hand by getting a detailed overview of the system they are dealing with. More information about RDA in general can be found here.

    Read the article

  • GNU GRUB version 1.99-21ubuntu3 with windows installer

    - by fwrlfo
    I have this problem after damage I think hit the OS GNU GRUB version 1.99-21ubuntu3 Minimal bash-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or file completions. I read the thread that was posted before but I don't have an ubuntu cd because I used "windows installer" ..... please don't tell me to uninstall it and install it again because I have important files and I don't want to lose. please help

    Read the article

  • Code bases for desktop and mobile versions of the same app

    - by Code-Guru
    I have written a small Java Swing desktop application. It seems like a natural step to port it to Android since I am interested in learning how to program for that platform. I believe that I can reuse some of my existing code base. (Of course, exactly how much reuse I can get out of it will only be determined as I start coding the Android app.) Currently I am hosting my Java Swing app on Sourceforge.net and use Git for version control. As I start creating the Android app, I am considering two options: Add the Android code to my existing repository, creating separate directories and Java packages for the Android-specific code and resources. Create a new Sourceforge project (or even host a new one) and creating a new Git repository. a. With a new repository, I can simply add the files from my original project that I will reuse. (I don't particularly like this option as it will be difficult to modify both copies of the same file in both repositories.) b. Or I can branch the original repository. This adds the difficulty of merging changes of shared source files. Mostly I am trying to decide between choices 1. and 2b. If I'm going to branch the existing repository, what advantages are there to hosting it as a separate SF project (or even using another OSS hosting service) as opposed to keeping all my source code in the current SF project?

    Read the article

  • Where to find other versions of Opera browser as deb packages?

    - by cipricus
    I used Opera mainly for the Unite feature now to be abandoned. It is missing in v. 12. Some say its features will re-emerge in future extensions etc. Until then, Unite is still accessible in v. 11. Where do I get the v.11 deb? P.S. In fact it seems that opera unite (at least in its older form) is dying while I am editing this question. Access to opera-unite applications from within opera-unite is poor or absent. This issue is obscure to me for now (31.08.2012) because yesterday I have installed v12 in Windows OS (with opera-unite and basic applications - file sharing and media player - already installed) and it is still working (server is working). The v12 Ubuntu version came today without unite, and after installing v11 (which has unite) I could not get applications (file sharing, etc). But they are still available: here and after downloading these files which have te .ua extension, they can be installed by opening them with Opera (v.11) But as opera-unite is no longer supported, it is possible that the server that provides the file sharing etc will soon be unaccessible. Even if that is the case the question should maybe not be closed at it has a general usefulness independently of the unite issue.

    Read the article

  • SVN Export or Recursively Remove .SVN Folders

    - by Ben Griswold
    I shared this script with a coworker yesterday. It doesn’t do much; it recursively deletes .svn folders from a source tree.  It comes in handy if you want to share your codebase or you get in a terrible spot with SVN and you just want to start all over. Just blow away all svn artifacts and use your mulligan. It’s true. You can nearly get the same result using the SVN export command which copies your source sans the .svn folders to an alternate location.  The catch is an export only includes those files/folders which exist under version control.  If you want a clean copy of your source – versioned or not – export just might not do. The contents of the .cmd file include the following: for /f "tokens=* delims=" %%i in (’dir /s /b /a:d *.svn’) do ( rd /s /q "%%i" ) Just download and drop the unzipped “SVN Cleanup.cmd” file into the root of the project, execute and away you go.  If you search around enough, I know you can find similar scripts and approaches elsewhere, but I’m still uploading my script for completeness and future reference. Download SVN Cleanup

    Read the article

  • What is an effective git process for managing our central code library?

    - by Mathew Byrne
    Quick background: we're a small web agency (3-6 developers at any one time) developing small to medium sized Symfony 1.4 sites. We've used git for a year now, but most of our developers have preferred Subversion and aren't used to a distributed model. For the past 6 months we've put a lot of development time into a central Symfony plugin that powers our custom CMS. This plugin includes a number of features, helpers, base classes etc. that we use to build custom functionality. This plugin is stored in git, but branches wildly as the plugin is used in various products and is pulled from/pushed to constantly. The repository is usually used as a submodule within a major project. The problems we're starting to see now are a large number of Merge conflicts and backwards incompatible changes brought into the repository by developers adding custom functionality in the context of their own project. I've read Vincent Driessen's excellent git branching model and successfully used it for projects in the past, but it doesn't seem to quite apply well to our particular situation; we have a number of projects concurrently using the same core plugin while developing new features for it. What we need is a strategy that provides the following: A methodology for developing major features within the code repository. A way of migrating those features into other projects. A way of versioning the core repository, and of tracking which version each major project uses. A plan for migrating bug fixes back to older versions. A cleaner history that's easier to see where changes have come from. Any suggestions or discussion would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How was Git designed?

    - by Mark Canlas
    My workplace recently switched to Git and I've been loving (and hating!) it. I really do love it, and it is extremely powerful. The only part I hate is that sometimes it's too powerful (and maybe a bit terse/confusing). My question is... How was Git designed? Just using it for a short amount of time, you get the feel that it can handle many obscure workflows that other version control systems could not. But it also feels elegant underneath. And fast! This is no doubt in part to Linus's talent. But I'm wondering, was the overall design of git based off of something? I've read about BitKeeper but the accounts are scant on technical details. The compression, the graphs, getting rid of revision numbers, emphasizing branching, stashing, remotes... Where did it all come from? Linus really knocked this one out of the park and on pretty much the first try! It's quite good to use once you're past the learning curve.

    Read the article

  • Big project layout : adding new feature on multiple sub-projects

    - by Shiplu
    I want to know how to manage a big project with many components with version control management system. In my current project there are 4 major parts. Web Server Admin console Platform. The web and server part uses 2 libraries that I wrote. In total there are 5 git repositories and 1 mercurial repository. The project build script is in Platform repository. It automates the whole building process. The problem is when I add a new feature that affects multiple components I have to create branch for each of the affected repo. Implement the feature. Merge it back. My gut feeling is "something is wrong". So should I create a single repo and put all the components there? I think branching will be easier in that case. Or I just do what I am doing right now. In that case how do I solve this problem of creating branch on each repository?

    Read the article

  • Best method to organize/manage dependencies in the VCS within a large solution

    - by SnOrfus
    A simple scenario: 2 projects are in version control The application The test(s) A significant number of checkins are made to the application daily. CI builds and runs all of the automation nightly. In order to write and/or run tests you need to have built the application (to reference/load instrumented assemblies). Now, consider the application to be massive, such that building it is prohibitive in time (an entire day to compile). The obvious side effect here, is that once you've performed a build locally, it is immediately inconsistent with latest. For instance: If I were to sync with latest, and open up one of the test projects, it would not locally build until I built the application. This is the same when syncing to another branch/build/tag. So, in order to even start working, I need to wait a day to build the application locally, so that the assemblies could be loaded - and then those assemblies wouldn't be latest. How do you organize the repository or (ideally) your development environment such that you can continually develop tests against whatever the current build is, or a given specific build, while minimizing building the application as much as possible?

    Read the article

  • Branching strategy for frequent releases

    - by Technext
    We have very frequent releases and we use Git for version control. When i am mentioning about frequency, please assume it to include bug-fixes and feature release too. All releases are eventually merged into ‘mainline’. When a release is deployed on production and if a bug is identified, people start fixing the bug on the same branch from which the latest release was deployed on production. They do not create a new bug-fix branch for the same. I feel that’s not the right way to go for. There are several components and each component has a different owner, and thus, different perspective. Though I have not initiated talks with them, I am sure there will be a lot of resistance. Main issue that they might cite would be, “There’s a lot of work involved in creating and tracking branches especially when there are so frequent deployments on production. This will consume a lot of dev effort.” Do you think that fixing bug on the same branch from which release was done, a good idea? If yes, how do you manage it? Using tags? I know that best practices may not always be applicable due to several factors but still I would like to know what might be a good approach for branching in a scenario where releases/bug-fixes happen almost on a daily basis.

    Read the article

  • git for personal (one-man) projects. Overkill?

    - by Anto
    I know, and use, two version control systems: Subversion and git. Subversion, as of now, gets used for personal projects where I am the only developer and git gets used for open source projects and projects where I believe others will also work on the project. This is mostly because of git's amazing forking and merging capabilities, where everyone may work on their own branch; very handy. Now, I use Subversion for personal projects, as I think git makes little sense there. It seems to be a little bit of overkill. It is OK for me if it is centralized (on my home server, usually) when I am the only developer; I take regular backups anyway. I don't need the ability to make my own branch, the main branch is my branch. Yes, SVN has simple support for branching, but much more powerful support for it makes no sense, I think. Merging can be a pain with it, or at least from my little experience. Is there any good reason for me to use git on personal projects, or is it just simply overkill?

    Read the article

  • Hosting Bazaar shared repositories

    - by Kishor Kundan
    What i want ? We operate in a small team of 9 people including developers, QA and designers. I want to setup a version control. We have a ubuntu (server edition) and i want to host all our repositories there. I have no understanding that even if it is possible. What I have done? We have setup bazaar on all distributions. We are using Bazaar explorer as our gui front-end. The command edition from console isn't very comfortable to all members. We have gone through the manual, but it hasn't been very helpful. Our inexperience being the cause. Team The designers are using windows distribution and developers & QA are using ubuntu distributions. I have googled around and i am really struggling to find a good tutorial for this setup. So any links/guides/leads towards accomplishing the same would be very helpful. While posting links or answer please do consider our inexperience. Thank you !!! cheers

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >