Search Results

Search found 54446 results on 2178 pages for 'struct vs class'.

Page 240/2178 | < Previous Page | 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247  | Next Page >

  • jQuery DOM element creation vs innerHTML

    - by Mohammad
    While having one of my questions answered, cletus mentioned that when creating elements in jQuery it's better to use direct DOM element creation, instead of innerHTML. I tried googling it but I wasn't able to find a good article with comparisons. I've provided this code bellow as an example and I was wondering if someone could help me rewrite it in direct DOM element creation form in hope that i would also learn the difference afterwards. var img = $(this); img.append('<p class="cap"><a href="'+img.parent().attr('href')+'">'+ img.attr('title')+'</p></a>'); Thanks so much.

    Read the article

  • Define 'poco'?

    - by saku
    Can someone define what exactly 'poco' means? I've encountering the term more and more often and I'm wondering is it only about plain classes or it mean something more?

    Read the article

  • Which is better? private static vs private

    - by KiD0M4N
    In this code sample: public class SuperMan { private static bool IsProper(decimal x) { return x > 31.0m && x < 45.0m; } public bool CheckStuff(string a, string b, string c) { // lots of code, some of which introduces a variable x return IsProper(x) && /* other conditions */; } } Should IsProper(..) be a 'private static' or a 'private'. Assuming: IsProper(..) doesn't need to access any instance state.

    Read the article

  • VC++ Charts using Chart X

    - by Arjun
    Hi, I'm new to drawing the chart using chartfx can you give me the meanings of teh following methods, they are kinda confusing...I did not find documentation anywhere. GetValue ( ) GetXValue ( ) PutItem() Thanks, Arjun

    Read the article

  • F#: Define an abstract class that inherits an infterface, but does not implement it

    - by akaphenom
    I owuld like to define an abstract class that inerhits from UserControl and my own Interface IUriProvider, but doesn't implement it. The goal is to be able to define pages (for silverlight) that implement UserControl but also provide their own Uri's (and then stick them in a list / array and deal with them as a set: type IUriProvider = interface abstract member uriString: String ; abstract member Uri : unit -> System.Uri ; end type UriUserControl() as this = inherit IUriProvider with abstract member uriString: String ; inherit UserControl() Also the Uri in the definition - I would like to implement as a property getter - and am having issues with that as well. this does not compile type IUriProvider = interface abstract member uriString: String with get; end Thank you...

    Read the article

  • synchronized block in JSP tag class

    - by Sudhakar
    Hi, I am trying to find answer for the following ,for the past couple of days ,but couldnt find comprehensive answer Problem Statement I have a custom JSP tag class which handles a web form submission ,captures data and write it to same file in the filesystem. As all web applications,this can be triggeredsimultaneosly ,and i fear that multiple threads would be in action handling each of the submission (we all know thats how Servlet works.) CODE synchronized (this){ final String reportFileName = "testReport.csv"; File reportDir = new File( rootCsDirectory, "reports" ); if(!reportDir.isDirectory())reportDir.mkdir(); File reportFile = new File (reportDir, reportFileName); logReport(reportFile,reportContent.toString()); } ISSUE: - A File object can be opened by one thread for writing and at same time another thread might try to access and fail and throw an exception So i thought of synchronizing (on the object ) should solve the issue , but read some where that jsp engine would have pool of jsp tag objects, so i am afraid that synchronized (this) wont work and it should be changed to synchronized (this.getClass())

    Read the article

  • Declarative JDOQL vs Single-String JDOQL : performance

    - by DrDro
    When querying with JDOQL is there a performance difference between using the declarative version and the Single-String version: Example from the JDOQL doc: //Declarative JDOQL : Query q = pm.newQuery(org.jpox.Person.class, "lastName == \"Jones\" && age < age_limit"); q.declareParameters("double age_limit"); List results = (List)q.execute(20.0); //Single-String JDOQL : Query q = pm.newQuery("SELECT FROM org.jpox.Person WHERE lastName == \"Jones\"" + " && age < :age_limit PARAMETERS double age_limit"); List results = (List)q.execute(20.0); Other then performance, are there any reasons for which one is better to use then the other or is it just about the one with which we feel more comfortable.

    Read the article

  • NS2, Otcl: using a variable of an owned instance within a class

    - by Hussain
    Hello all, I'm using NS2 to create some new classes in C++ and then link them to otcl. The linkage and everything works, but when I try to use the otcl variables in an object, I'm having a trouble. For example, suppose I have a class "Node" with the variable X. In the code I want to set this value and later on use it in some if-statements. Setting the variable is no problem using this code: $node1 set x 4 Now the problem I'm having is when I try to use this variable x anywhere. In C++ we could use a general variable (i.e. y) and say "y=node.x and then use y in some if-statements. I have tried to look for a method to perform the same thing in otcl, but failed. Any help is appriciated. Thanks in Advance.

    Read the article

  • Basic Java Multi-Threading Question

    - by Veered
    When an object is instantiated in Java, is it bound to the thread that instantiated in? Because when I anonymously implement an interface in one thread, and pass it to another thread to be run, all of its methods are run in the original thread. If they are bound to their creation thread, is there anyway to create an object that will run in whatever thread calls it?

    Read the article

  • .NET template class instance - passing a variable data type

    - by FerretallicA
    As the title suggests, I'm tyring to pass a variable data type to a template class. Something like this: frmExample = New LookupForm(Of Models.MyClass) 'Works fine Dim SelectedType As Type = InstanceOfMyClass.GetType() 'Works fine frmExample = New LookupForm(Of SelectedType) 'Ba-bow! frmExample = New LookupForm(Of InstanceOfMyClass.GetType()) 'Ba-bow! LookupForm<Models.MyClass> frmExample; Type SelectedType = InstanceOfMyClass.GetType(); frmExample = new LookupForm<SelectedType.GetType()>(); //Ba-bow frmExample = new LookupForm<(Type)SelectedType>(); //Ba-bow I'm assuming it's something to do with the template being processed at compile time but even if I'm off the mark there, it wouldn't solve my problem anyway. I can't find any relevant information on using Reflection to instance template classes either. (How) can I create an instance of a dynamically typed repository at runtime?

    Read the article

  • Ruby Exception or Error?

    - by Ell
    I have noticed that in the Ruby exception hierarchy, there are "errors" such as ArgumentError and there are "exceptions" such as SignalException. Is there a certain practise of naming exceptions? thanks in advance, ell.

    Read the article

  • Getting the .NET Class associated with a process

    - by John P. Grieb
    As part of a WMI Coupled provider that I'm creating I need to write an instance enumerator. The code I have is below. What I need to do is get the Class instance associated with the process. Any ideas? static public WMIProviderSample GetInstance([ManagementName("ID")] int processId) { try { Process[] processes = Process.GetProcessesByName("WMI Provider Sample"); foreach (Process process in processes) { if (process.Id == processId) { // Need to convert the process to an instance of WMIProviderSampel } } return null; } catch (ArgumentException) { return null; } }

    Read the article

  • Loading an OverlayView from XIB -vs- programmatically for use with UIImagePickerController

    - by PLG
    I am currently making a camera app for iPhone and I have a strange phenomenon that I can't figure out. I would appreciate some help understanding. When recreating an overlay view for passing to UIImagePickerController, I have been successfully been able to create the view programmatically. What I haven't been able to do is create the view with/without controller in IB, load it and pass it to the overlay pointer successfully. If I do it via IB, the view is not opaque and obscures the view of the camera completely. I can not figure out why. I was thinking that the normal view pointer might be assigned when loading from XIB and therefore overwrite the camera's view, but I have an example programmatically where view and overlayView are set equal in the controller class. Perhaps the load order is overwriting a pointer? Help would be appreciated... kind regards.

    Read the article

  • Load vs Get in Nhibernate

    - by Quintin Par
    The master page in my web application does authentication and loads up the user entity using a Get. After this whenever the user object is needed by the usercontrols or any other class I do a Load. Normally nhibernate is supposed to load the object from cache or return the persistent loaded object whenever Load of called. But this is not the behavior shown by my web application. NHprof always shows the sql whenever Load is called. How do I verify the correct behavior of Load? I use the S#arp architecture framework.

    Read the article

  • immutable strings vs std::string

    - by Caspin
    I've recent been reading about immutable strings, here and here as well some stuff about why D chose immutable strings. There seem to be many advantages. trivially thread safe more secure more memory efficient in most use cases. cheap substrings (tokenizing and slicing) Not to mention most new languages have immutable strings, D2.0, Java, C#, Python, Ruby, etc. Would C++ benefit from immutable strings? Is it possible to implement an immutable string class in c++ (or c++0x) that would have all of these advantages?

    Read the article

  • implicit parameter definition in class

    - by coubeatczech
    implicit val odkaz = head; def vypis(implicit odkaz:Prvek):String = { odkaz match{ case null => "" case e => e.cislo + " " + e.pocet + "\n" + vypis(e.dalsi) } } ... def main(args:Array[String]){ val q = new MyQueue() // insert some values println(q.vypis) } This method(vypis) is a member of an queue-class so I'll always want to implicity start the recursion from the start of the queue, when calling the method from outside. Is there a way how to write it, that the method from outside calling, there's no paramter, but in inside, there's a parameter - for recursion...? The compiler complains that the parameter is not defined when called from outside

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework: Data Centric vs. Object Centric

    - by Eric J.
    I'm having a look at Entity Framework and everything I'm reading takes a data centric approach to explaining EF. By that I mean that the fundamental relationships of the system are first defined in the database and objects are generated that reflect those relationships. Examples Quickstart (Entity Framework) Using Entity Framework entities as business objects? The EF documentation implies that it's not necessary to start from the database layer, e.g. Developers can work with a consistent application object model that can be mapped to various storage schemas When designing a new system (simplified version), I tend to first create a class model, then generate business objects from the model, code business layer stuff that can't be generated, and then worry about persistence (or rather work with a DBA and let him worry about the most efficient persistence strategy). That object centric approach is well supported by ORM technologies such as (n)Hibernate. Is there a reasonable path to an object centric approach with EF? Will I be swimming upstream going that route? Any good starting points?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to overwrite a static method in parent class?

    - by MartinDenny2069
    I have a static method defined in a base class, I want to overwrite this method in its child class, is it possible? I tried this but it did not work as I expected. When I created an instance of class B and invoke its callMe() method, the static foo() method in class A is invoked. public abstract class A { public static void foo() { System.out.println("I am base class"); } public void callMe() { foo(); } } Public class B { public static void foo() { System.out.println("I am child class"); } }

    Read the article

  • Connecting SceneBuilder edited FXML to Java code

    - by daniel
    Recently I had to answer several questions regarding how to connect an UI built with the JavaFX SceneBuilder 1.0 Developer Preview to Java Code. So I figured out that a short overview might be helpful. But first, let me state the obvious. What is FXML? To make it short, FXML is an XML based declaration format for JavaFX. JavaFX provides an FXML loader which will parse FXML files and from that construct a graph of Java object. It may sound complex when stated like that but it is actually quite simple. Here is an example of FXML file, which instantiate a StackPane and puts a Button inside it: -- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?import java.lang.*?> <?import java.util.*?> <?import javafx.scene.control.*?> <?import javafx.scene.layout.*?> <?import javafx.scene.paint.*?> <StackPane prefHeight="150.0" prefWidth="200.0" xmlns:fx="http://javafx.com/fxml"> <children> <Button mnemonicParsing="false" text="Button" /> </children> </StackPane> ... and here is the code I would have had to write if I had chosen to do the same thing programatically: import javafx.scene.control.*; import javafx.scene.layout.*; ... final Button button = new Button("Button"); button.setMnemonicParsing(false); final StackPane stackPane = new StackPane(); stackPane.setPrefWidth(200.0); stackPane.setPrefHeight(150.0); stacPane.getChildren().add(button); As you can see - FXML is rather simple to understand - as it is quite close to the JavaFX API. So OK FXML is simple, but why would I use it?Well, there are several answers to that - but my own favorite is: because you can make it with SceneBuilder. What is SceneBuilder? In short SceneBuilder is a layout tool that will let you graphically build JavaFX user interfaces by dragging and dropping JavaFX components from a library, and save it as an FXML file. SceneBuilder can also be used to load and modify JavaFX scenegraphs declared in FXML. Here is how I made the small FXML file above: Start the JavaFX SceneBuilder 1.0 Developer Preview In the Library on the left hand side, click on 'StackPane' and drag it on the content view (the white rectangle) In the Library, select a Button and drag it onto the StackPane on the content view. In the Hierarchy Panel on the left hand side - select the StackPane component, then invoke 'Edit > Trim To Selected' from the menubar That's it - you can now save, and you will obtain the small FXML file shown above. Of course this is only a trivial sample, made for the sake of the example - and SceneBuilder will let you create much more complex UIs. So, I have now an FXML file. But what do I do with it? How do I include it in my program? How do I write my main class? Loading an FXML file with JavaFX Well, that's the easy part - because the piece of code you need to write never changes. You can download and look at the SceneBuilder samples if you need to get convinced, but here is the short version: Create a Java class (let's call it 'Main.java') which extends javafx.application.Application In the same directory copy/save the FXML file you just created using SceneBuilder. Let's name it "simple.fxml" Now here is the Java code for the Main class, which simply loads the FXML file and puts it as root in a stage's scene. /* * Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. */ package simple; import java.util.logging.Level; import java.util.logging.Logger; import javafx.application.Application; import javafx.fxml.FXMLLoader; import javafx.scene.Scene; import javafx.scene.layout.StackPane; import javafx.stage.Stage; public class Main extends Application { /** * @param args the command line arguments */ public static void main(String[] args) { Application.launch(Main.class, (java.lang.String[])null); } @Override public void start(Stage primaryStage) { try { StackPane page = (StackPane) FXMLLoader.load(Main.class.getResource("simple.fxml")); Scene scene = new Scene(page); primaryStage.setScene(scene); primaryStage.setTitle("FXML is Simple"); primaryStage.show(); } catch (Exception ex) { Logger.getLogger(Main.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex); } } } Great! Now I only have to use my favorite IDE to compile the class and run it. But... wait... what does it do? Well nothing. It just displays a button in the middle of a window. There's no logic attached to it. So how do we do that? How can I connect this button to my application logic? Here is how: Connection to code First let's define our application logic. Since this post is only intended to give a very brief overview - let's keep things simple. Let's say that the only thing I want to do is print a message on System.out when the user clicks on my button. To do that, I'll need to register an action handler with my button. And to do that, I'll need to somehow get a handle on my button. I'll need some kind of controller logic that will get my button and add my action handler to it. So how do I get a handle to my button and pass it to my controller? Once again - this is easy: I just need to write a controller class for my FXML. With each FXML file, it is possible to associate a controller class defined for that FXML. That controller class will make the link between the UI (the objects defined in the FXML) and the application logic. To each object defined in FXML we can associate an fx:id. The value of the id must be unique within the scope of the FXML, and is the name of an instance variable inside the controller class, in which the object will be injected. Since I want to have access to my button, I will need to add an fx:id to my button in FXML, and declare an @FXML variable in my controller class with the same name. In other words - I will need to add fx:id="myButton" to my button in FXML: -- <Button fx:id="myButton" mnemonicParsing="false" text="Button" /> and declare @FXML private Button myButton in my controller class @FXML private Button myButton; // value will be injected by the FXMLLoader Let's see how to do this. Add an fx:id to the Button object Load "simple.fxml" in SceneBuilder - if not already done In the hierarchy panel (bottom left), or directly on the content view, select the Button object. Open the Properties sections of the inspector (right panel) for the button object At the top of the section, you will see a text field labelled fx:id. Enter myButton in that field and validate. Associate a controller class with the FXML file Still in SceneBuilder, select the top root object (in our case, that's the StackPane), and open the Code section of the inspector (right hand side) At the top of the section you should see a text field labelled Controller Class. In the field, type simple.SimpleController. This is the name of the class we're going to create manually. If you save at this point, the FXML will look like this: -- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?import java.lang.*?> <?import java.util.*?> <?import javafx.scene.control.*?> <?import javafx.scene.layout.*?> <?import javafx.scene.paint.*?> <StackPane prefHeight="150.0" prefWidth="200.0" xmlns:fx="http://javafx.com/fxml" fx:controller="simple.SimpleController"> <children> <Button fx:id="myButton" mnemonicParsing="false" text="Button" /> </children> </StackPane> As you can see, the name of the controller class has been added to the root object: fx:controller="simple.SimpleController" Coding the controller class In your favorite IDE, create an empty SimpleController.java class. Now what does a controller class looks like? What should we put inside? Well - SceneBuilder will help you there: it will show you an example of controller skeleton tailored for your FXML. In the menu bar, invoke View > Show Sample Controller Skeleton. A popup appears, displaying a suggestion for the controller skeleton: copy the code displayed there, and paste it into your SimpleController.java: /** * Sample Skeleton for "simple.fxml" Controller Class * Use copy/paste to copy paste this code into your favorite IDE **/ package simple; import java.net.URL; import java.util.ResourceBundle; import javafx.fxml.FXML; import javafx.fxml.Initializable; import javafx.scene.control.Button; public class SimpleController implements Initializable { @FXML // fx:id="myButton" private Button myButton; // Value injected by FXMLLoader @Override // This method is called by the FXMLLoader when initialization is complete public void initialize(URL fxmlFileLocation, ResourceBundle resources) { assert myButton != null : "fx:id=\"myButton\" was not injected: check your FXML file 'simple.fxml'."; // initialize your logic here: all @FXML variables will have been injected } } Note that the code displayed by SceneBuilder is there only for educational purpose: SceneBuilder does not create and does not modify Java files. This is simply a hint of what you can use, given the fx:id present in your FXML file. You are free to copy all or part of the displayed code and paste it into your own Java class. Now at this point, there only remains to add our logic to the controller class. Quite easy: in the initialize method, I will register an action handler with my button: () { @Override public void handle(ActionEvent event) { System.out.println("That was easy, wasn't it?"); } }); ... -- ... // initialize your logic here: all @FXML variables will have been injected myButton.setOnAction(new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() { @Override public void handle(ActionEvent event) { System.out.println("That was easy, wasn't it?"); } }); ... That's it - if you now compile everything in your IDE, and run your application, clicking on the button should print a message on the console! Summary What happens is that in Main.java, the FXMLLoader will load simple.fxml from the jar/classpath, as specified by 'FXMLLoader.load(Main.class.getResource("simple.fxml"))'. When loading simple.fxml, the loader will find the name of the controller class, as specified by 'fx:controller="simple.SimpleController"' in the FXML. Upon finding the name of the controller class, the loader will create an instance of that class, in which it will try to inject all the objects that have an fx:id in the FXML. Thus, after having created '<Button fx:id="myButton" ... />', the FXMLLoader will inject the button instance into the '@FXML private Button myButton;' instance variable found on the controller instance. This is because The instance variable has an @FXML annotation, The name of the variable exactly matches the value of the fx:id Finally, when the whole FXML has been loaded, the FXMLLoader will call the controller's initialize method, and our code that registers an action handler with the button will be executed. For a complete example, take a look at the HelloWorld SceneBuilder sample. Also make sure to follow the SceneBuilder Get Started guide, which will guide you through a much more complete example. Of course, there are more elegant ways to set up an Event Handler using FXML and SceneBuilder. There are also many different ways to work with the FXMLLoader. But since it's starting to be very late here, I think it will have to wait for another post. I hope you have enjoyed the tour! --daniel

    Read the article

  • What 'best practices' exist for handing enum heirarchies?

    - by FerretallicA
    I'm curious as to any solutions out there for addressing enum heirarchies. I'm working through some docs on Entity Framework 4 and trying to apply it to a simple inventory tracking program. The possible types for inventory to fall into are as follows: INVENTORY ITEM TYPES: Hardware PC Desktop Server Laptop Accessory Input (keyboards, scanners etc) Output (monitors, printers etc) Storage (USB sticks, tape drives etc) Communication (network cards, routers etc) Software What recommendations are there for handling enums in a situation like this? Are enums even the solution? I don't really want to have a ridiculously normalised database for such a relatively simple experiment (eg tables for InventoryType, InventorySubtype, InventoryTypeToSubtype etc). I don't really want to over-complicate my data model with each subtype being inherited even though no additional properties or methods are included (except PC types which would ideally have associated accessories and software but that's probably out of scope here). It feels like there should be a really simple, elegant solution to this but I can't put my finger on it. Any assistance or input appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Marshal a C++ class to C#

    - by Adam Haile
    I need to access code in a native C++ DLL in some C# code but am having issues figuring out the marshaling. I've done this before with code that was straight C, but seem to have found that it's not directly possible with C++ classes. Made even more complicated by the fact that many of the classes contain virtual or inline functions. I even tried passing the headers through the PInvoke Interop Assistant, but it would choke on just about everything and not really no what to do... I'm guessing because it's not really supported. So how, if at all possible, can you use a native C++ class DLL from .NET code. If I have to use some intermediary (CLR C++?) that's fine.

    Read the article

  • Use super class's address/pointer in initialization list

    - by JQ
    context 1: class D : public B1, public B2{}; context 2: B2 takes B1 to initialize: B2( B1 * ) //B2's constructor my question is in D's initialization list: D::D() : B1(), B2( ? )... What should be in ? I don't want to put " (B1*)this " in the ? place, because it's no good to use "this" in initialization list. And since B1 part has been initialized, it makes sense to use it. What should I do ?

    Read the article

  • MembershipUser class CreateUser password paramter

    - by d3020
    I'm using the ASP.NET Configuration for my users and their roles. I'm also using the MembershipUser class with its function CreateUser. I have it working, but was curious about something. When I add a new user and pass this function its password parameter (which in this case is coming from a textbox on the page). It seems like it only finds and accepts that textbox value when it is 6 chars or more. For example, if I type in ab123 it'll say object not set to instance of an object. However if I do abc123 it works fine. Where is that being told to do that. I didn't know if this was something I could change or where it might be doing that. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • content show problem

    - by nonab
    I still fight with some jquery scripts:) With my first problem Jens Fahnenbruck helped me here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3021476/problem-with-hide-show-in-jquery thanks:) Now i added another fancy thing - jquery tabs Made a few modifications and it works like this: When you click on tab and it loads different main image for every tab. The problem is that i used $(document).ready(function() to handle those image changes. When i click any of 2x2 box images (on any tab) it will permanently change the image on the right and when i click on tabs it won't work like it did at the beginning. online example: http://rarelips.ayz.pl/testy/2/ code: <style type="text/css"> body { font: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif normal 10px; margin: 0; padding: 0; } * {margin: 0; padding: 0;} img {border: none;} .container { height: 500px; width: 1000px; margin: -180px 0 0 -450px; top: 50%; left: 50%; position: absolute; } ul.thumb { float: left; list-style: none; margin: 0; padding: 10px; width: 360px; } ul.thumb li { margin: 0; padding: 5px; float: left; position: relative; width: 165px; height: 165px; } ul.thumb li img { width: 150px; height: 150px; border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 10px; background: #f0f0f0; position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0; -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; } ul.thumb li img.hover { background:url(thumb_bg.png) no-repeat center center; border: none; } #main_view { float: left; padding: 9px 0; margin-left: -10px; } #main_view2 { float: left; padding: 9px 0; margin-left: -10px; } #main_view3 { float: left; padding: 9px 0; margin-left: -10px; } #main_view4 { float: left; padding: 9px 0; margin-left: -10px; } #wiecej { float: right; padding: 9px 0; margin-right: 20px; } .demo-show { width: 350px; margin: 1em .5em; } .demo-show h3 { margin: 0; padding: .25em; background: #bfcd93; border-top: 1px solid #386785; border-bottom: 1px solid #386785; } .demo-show div { padding: .5em .25em; } /* styl do tabek */ ul.tabs { margin: 0; padding: 0; float: left; list-style: none; height: 32px; /*--Set height of tabs--*/ border-bottom: 1px solid #999; border-left: 1px solid #999; width: 100%; } ul.tabs li { float: left; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 31px; /*--Subtract 1px from the height of the unordered list--*/ line-height: 31px; /*--Vertically aligns the text within the tab--*/ border: 1px solid #999; border-left: none; margin-bottom: -1px; /*--Pull the list item down 1px--*/ overflow: hidden; position: relative; background: #e0e0e0; } ul.tabs li a { text-decoration: none; color: #000; display: block; font-size: 1.2em; padding: 0 20px; border: 1px solid #fff; /*--Gives the bevel look with a 1px white border inside the list item--*/ outline: none; } ul.tabs li a:hover { background: #ccc; } html ul.tabs li.active, html ul.tabs li.active a:hover { /*--Makes sure that the active tab does not listen to the hover properties--*/ background: #fff; border-bottom: 1px solid #fff; /*--Makes the active tab look like it's connected with its content--*/ } .tab_container { border: 1px solid #999; border-top: none; overflow: hidden; clear: both; float: left; width: 100%; background: #fff; } .tab_content { padding: 20px; font-size: 1.2em; } </style> <script type="text/javascript" src="index_pliki/jquery-latest.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ //Larger thumbnail preview $("ul.thumb li").hover(function() { $(this).css({'z-index' : '10'}); $(this).find('img').addClass("hover").stop() .animate({ marginTop: '-110px', marginLeft: '-110px', top: '50%', left: '50%', width: '200px', height: '200px', padding: '5px' }, 200); } , function() { $(this).css({'z-index' : '0'}); $(this).find('img').removeClass("hover").stop() .animate({ marginTop: '0', marginLeft: '0', top: '0', left: '0', width: '150px', height: '150px', padding: '10px' }, 400); }); //Swap Image on Click $("ul.thumb li a").click(function() { var mainImage = $(this).attr("href"); //Find Image Name $("#main_view img").attr({ src: mainImage }); $("#main_view2 img").attr({ src: mainImage }); $("#main_view3 img").attr({ src: mainImage }); $("#main_view4 img").attr({ src: mainImage }); return false; }); }); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#main_view img").attr({ src: './index_pliki/max1.jpg' }); $("#slickbox div[data-id=" + '01' + "].slickbox").show('slow'); $('a.slick-toggle').click(function() { var dataID = $(this).attr("data-id"); $('#slickbox div.slickbox').hide(); $("#slickbox div[data-id=" + dataID + "].slickbox").show('slow'); return false; }); }); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#main_view2 img").attr({ src: './index_pliki/max2.jpg' }); $("#slickbox2 div[data-id=" + '11' + "].slickbox2").show('slow'); $('a.slick-toggle').click(function() { var dataID = $(this).attr("data-id"); $('#slickbox2 div.slickbox2').hide(); $("#slickbox2 div[data-id=" + dataID + "].slickbox2").show('slow'); return false; }); }); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#main_view3 img").attr({ src: './index_pliki/max3.jpg' }); $("#slickbox3 div[data-id=" + '21' + "].slickbox3").show('slow'); $('a.slick-toggle').click(function() { var dataID = $(this).attr("data-id"); $('#slickbox3 div.slickbox3').hide(); $("#slickbox3 div[data-id=" + dataID + "].slickbox3").show('slow'); return false; }); }); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#main_view4 img").attr({ src: './index_pliki/max4.jpg' }); $("#slickbox4 div[data-id=" + '31' + "].slickbox4").show('slow'); $('a.slick-toggle').click(function() { var dataID = $(this).attr("data-id"); $('#slickbox4 div.slickbox4').hide(); $("#slickbox4 div[data-id=" + dataID + "].slickbox4").show('slow'); return false; }); }); </script> <script type ="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { //When page loads... $(".tab_content").hide(); //Hide all content $("ul.tabs li:first").addClass("active").show(); //Activate first tab $(".tab_content:first").show(); //Show first tab content //On Click Event $("ul.tabs li").click(function() { $("ul.tabs li").removeClass("active"); //Remove any "active" class $(this).addClass("active"); //Add "active" class to selected tab $(".tab_content").hide(); //Hide all tab content var activeTab = $(this).find("a").attr("href"); //Find the href attribute value to identify the active tab + content $(activeTab).fadeIn(); //Fade in the active ID content return false; }); }); </script> </head> <body> <div class="container"> <ul class="tabs"> <li><a href="#tab1">1</a></li> <li><a href="#tab2">2</a></li> <li><a href="#tab3">3</a></li> <li><a href="#tab4">4</a></li> </ul> <div class="tab_container"> <div id="tab1" class="tab_content"> <!--Content--> <ul class="thumb"> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max1.jpg" data-id="01"><img src="./index_pliki/min1.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max2.jpg" data-id="02"><img src="./index_pliki/min2.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max3.jpg" data-id="03"><img src="./index_pliki/min3.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max4.jpg" data-id="04"><img src="./index_pliki/min4.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> </ul> <div id="main_view"> <a href="index.htm"><img src="index_pliki/max1.jpg" alt=""/></a> <small style="float: right; color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"> </small> </div> <div id="wiecej"> <div id="slickbox"> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox" data-id="01" style="display: none;"> 1.1 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox" data-id="02" style="display: none;"> 1.2 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox" data-id="03" style="display: none;"> 1.3 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox" data-id="04" style="display: none;"> 1.4 </div> <!-- <a href="#" id="slick-show"><img src="http://www.amptech.pl/images/more.jpg" alt="Zobacz wiecej" /></a> <a href="#" id="slick-hide"><img src="http://www.amptech.pl/images/online.jpg" alt="Zobacz wiecej" /></a>&nbsp;&nbsp; --> </div> </div> </div> <!-- tutaj wklejalem reszte --> <div id="tab2" class="tab_content"> <!--Content--> <ul class="thumb"> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max4.jpg" data-id="11"><img src="./index_pliki/min4.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max3.jpg" data-id="12"><img src="./index_pliki/min3.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max2.jpg" data-id="13"><img src="./index_pliki/min2.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max1.jpg" data-id="14"><img src="./index_pliki/min1.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> </ul> <div id="main_view2"> <a href="index.htm"><img src="index_pliki/max1.jpg" alt=""/></a> <small style="float: right; color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"> </small> </div> <div id="wiecej"> <div id="slickbox2"> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox2" data-id="11" style="display: none;"> 2.1 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox2" data-id="12" style="display: none;"> 2.2 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox2" data-id="13" style="display: none;"> 2.3 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox2" data-id="14" style="display: none;"> 2.4 </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="tab3" class="tab_content"> <ul class="thumb"> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max4.jpg" data-id="21"><img src="./index_pliki/min4.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max3.jpg" data-id="22"><img src="./index_pliki/min3.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max2.jpg" data-id="23"><img src="./index_pliki/min2.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max1.jpg" data-id="24"><img src="./index_pliki/min1.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> </ul> <div id="main_view3"> <a href="index.htm"><img src="index_pliki/max1.jpg" alt=""/></a> <small style="float: right; color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"> </small> </div> <div id="wiecej"> <div id="slickbox3"> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox3" data-id="21" style="display: none;"> 3.1 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox3" data-id="22" style="display: none;"> 3.2 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox3" data-id="23" style="display: none;"> 3.3 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox3" data-id="24" style="display: none;"> 3.4 </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="tab4" class="tab_content"> <ul class="thumb"> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max4.jpg" data-id="31"><img src="./index_pliki/min4.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max3.jpg" data-id="32"><img src="./index_pliki/min3.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max2.jpg" data-id="33"><img src="./index_pliki/min2.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> <li><a class="slick-toggle" href="./index_pliki/max1.jpg" data-id="34"><img src="./index_pliki/min1.jpg" alt="" /></a></li> </ul> <div id="main_view4"> <a href="index.htm"><img src="index_pliki/max1.jpg" alt=""/></a> <small style="float: right; color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"> </small> </div> <div id="wiecej"> <div id="slickbox4"> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox4" data-id="31" style="display: none;"> 4.1 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox4" data-id="32" style="display: none;"> 4.2 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox4" data-id="33" style="display: none;"> 4.3 </div> <div id="someOtherID" class="slickbox4" data-id="34" style="display: none;"> 4.4 </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247  | Next Page >