Search Results

Search found 26115 results on 1045 pages for 'table alias'.

Page 244/1045 | < Previous Page | 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251  | Next Page >

  • How to create Query syntax for multiple DataTable for implementing IN operator of Sql Server

    - by Shantanu Gupta
    I have fetched 3-4 tables by executing my stored procedure. Now they resides on my dataset. I have to maintain this dataset for multiple forms and I am not doing any DML operation on this dataset. Now this dataset contains 4 tables out of which i have to fetch some records to display data. Data stored in tables are in form of one to many relationship. i.e. In case of transactions. N records per record. Then these N records are further mapped to M records of 3rd table. Table 1 MAP_ID GUEST_ID DEPARTMENT_ID PARENT_ID PREFERENCE_ID -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- 19 61 1 1 5 14 61 1 5 15 15 61 2 4 10 18 61 2 13 23 17 61 2 20 26 16 61 40 40 41 20 62 1 5 14 21 62 1 5 15 22 62 1 6 16 24 62 2 3 4 23 62 2 4 9 27 62 2 13 23 25 62 2 20 24 26 62 2 20 25 28 63 1 1 5 29 63 1 1 8 34 63 1 5 15 30 63 2 4 10 33 63 2 4 11 31 63 2 13 23 32 63 40 40 41 35 65 1 NULL 1 36 65 1 NULL 1 38 68 2 13 22 37 68 2 20 25 39 68 2 23 27 40 92 1 NULL 1 Table 2 Department_ID Department_Name Parent_Id Parent_Name -------------------- ----------------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Food 1, 5, 6 Food, North Indian, South Indian 2 Lodging 3, 4, 13, 20, 23 Room, Floor, Non Air Conditioned, With Balcony, Without Balcony 40 New 40 SubNew TABLE 3 Parent_Id Parent_Name Preference_ID Preference_Name -------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------- NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 Food 5, 8 North Indian, Italian 3 Room 4 Floor 4 Floor 9, 10, 11 First, Second, Third 5 North Indian 14, 15 X, Y 6 South Indian 16 Dosa 13 Non Air Conditioned 22, 23 With Balcony, Without Balcony 20 With Balcony 24, 25, 26 Mountain View, Ocean View, Garden View 23 Without Balcony 27 Mountain View 40 New 41 SubNew I have these 3 tables that are related in some fashion like this. Table 1 will be the master for these 2 tables i.e. table 2 and table 3. I need to query on them as SELECT Department_Id, Department_Name, Parent_Name FROM Table2 WHERE Department_Id in ( SELECT Department_Id FROM Table1 WHERE guest_id=65 ) SELECT Parent_Id, Parent_Name, Preference_Name FROM Table3 WHERE PARENT_ID in ( SELECT parent_id FROM Table1 WHERE guest_id=65 ) Now I need to use these queries on DataTables. So I am using Query Syntax for this and reached up to this point. var dept_list= from dept in DtMapGuestDepartment.AsEnumerable() where dept.Field<long>("PK_GUEST_ID")==long.Parse(63) select dept; This should give me the list of all departments that has guest id =63 Now I want to select all departments_name and parent_name from Table 2 where guest_id=63 i.e. departments that i fetched above. This same case will be followed for Table3. Please suggest how to do this. Thanks for keeping up patience for reading my question.

    Read the article

  • mysql select top users problem

    - by moustafa
    i have users table and i have posts table i want select from users the top users that have the big amount of posts from posts table and order them by numbers of posts i can make it by array_count_values() by i cant order it now i think if i make it by one mysql query by left and join will be more better table structure posts id | auther_id

    Read the article

  • Is there anything else I can do to optimize this MySQL query?

    - by Legend
    I have two tables, Table A with 700,000 entries and Table B with 600,000 entries. The structure is as follows: Table A: +-----------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-----------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | bigint(20) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | number | bigint(20) unsigned | YES | | NULL | | +-----------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ Table B: +-------------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | bigint(20) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | number_s | bigint(20) unsigned | YES | MUL | NULL | | | number_e | bigint(20) unsigned | YES | MUL | NULL | | | source | varchar(50) | YES | | NULL | | +-------------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ I am trying to find if any of the values in Table A are present in Table B using the following code: $sql = "SELECT number from TableA"; $result = mysql_query($sql) or die(mysql_error()); while($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) { $number = $row['number']; $sql = "SELECT source, count(source) FROM TableB WHERE number_s < $number AND number_e > $number GROUP BY source"; $re = mysql_query($sql) or die(mysql_error); while($ro = mysql_fetch_array($re)) { echo $number."\t".$ro[0]."\t".$ro[1]."\n"; } } I was hoping that the query would go fast but then for some reason, it isn't terrible fast. My explain on the select (with a particular value of "number") gives me the following: mysql> explain SELECT source, count(source) FROM TableB WHERE number_s < 1812194440 AND number_e > 1812194440 GROUP BY source; +----+-------------+------------+------+-------------------------+------+---------+------+--------+----------------------------------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+------------+------+-------------------------+------+---------+------+--------+----------------------------------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | TableB | ALL | number_s,number_e | NULL | NULL | NULL | 696325 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort | +----+-------------+------------+------+-------------------------+------+---------+------+--------+----------------------------------------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) Is there any optimization that I can squeeze out of this? I tried writing a stored procedure for the same task but it doesn't even seem to work in the first place... It doesn't give any syntax errors... I tried running it for a day and it was still running which felt odd. CREATE PROCEDURE Filter() Begin DECLARE number BIGINT UNSIGNED; DECLARE x INT; DECLARE done INT DEFAULT 0; DECLARE cur1 CURSOR FOR SELECT number FROM TableA; DECLARE CONTINUE HANDLER FOR NOT FOUND SET done = 1; CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE IF NOT EXISTS Flags(number bigint unsigned, count int(11)); OPEN cur1; hist_loop: LOOP FETCH cur1 INTO number; SELECT count(*) from TableB WHERE number_s < number AND number_e > number INTO x; IF done = 1 THEN LEAVE hist_loop; END IF; IF x IS NOT NULL AND x>0 THEN INSERT INTO Flags(number, count) VALUES(number, x); END IF; END LOOP hist_loop; CLOSE cur1; END

    Read the article

  • DELETE from two tables with one OUTPUT clause?

    - by lance
    This deletes the document from the Document table and outputs information about the deleted document into the FinishedDocument table. DELETE FROM Document OUTPUT Deleted.DocumentId , Deleted.DocumentDescription INTO FinishedDocument WHERE DocumentId = @DocumentId I need to delete the document not just from the Document table, but also from the DocumentBackup table. Meanwhile, I need to maintain insertion into FinishedDocument. Is all of this possible with only one statement? If not, is a second DELETE (against DocumentBackup), with all of it wrapped in a transaction, the way to go?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Select Distinct

    - by homam
    I want to write a query like this: For a table that has these columns: ColA ColB ColC, ColD select first(ColA, ColB, ColC, ColD) distinct(ColB, ColC) from table order by ColD The query is supposed to order the table by ColD, then group the results by the combination of ColB and ColC (they may have different data types) and returns the first rows (with all the columns of the table) in the groups. How is it possible in MS SQL Server 2005?

    Read the article

  • can i use MAX function for each tuple in the retrieved data set

    - by kshama
    Hi, My table result contains fields: id count ____________ 1 3 2 2 3 2 From this table i have to form another table **score** which should look as follows id my_score ___________ 1 1.0000 2 0.6667 3 0.6667 That is my_score=count/MAX(count) but if i give the query as create TEMPORARY TABLE(select id,(count/MAX(count)) AS my_score from result); only 1 st row is retrieved.Can any one suggest the query so that my_score is calculated for all tuples. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How to remove extra space between two tables in latex

    - by laspal
    Hi, I wanted to remove extra space between the two tables. \begin{table}[h]\small \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline \end{tabular} \end{table} \begin{table}[h]\small \begin{tabular}{|p{9.9cm}|p{2cm}|p{2.3cm}|p{2.3cm}|} \end{tabular} \end{table} between these two tables I am getting too much spaces. I wont to reduce the space and start the 2table after first with space of say 2cm. Thanks

    Read the article

  • OrderBy After Group?

    - by Soo
    Ok, so I have a table Table: Id Value If I query my table and group my result by "Value" how can I make it so each of the groups are alphabetized (a group grouped by a "Value"="a" will come before a group grouped by a "Value" = "z"). My current query looks something like this: var Result = from a in DB.Table orderby a.Value group by a.Value into b select new {Groupz = b};

    Read the article

  • When doing a Schema Export with hbm2ddl, is there a way to specify that you DO NOT want Nullable For

    - by Jon Erickson
    The DDL that is being created is putting all of my many to many associations into 1 table, but I actually want each many to many association in its' own table (for other reasons) Right now hbm2ddl is creating this table (only Table1Key OR Table2Key OR Table3Key should be filled out for any given record, causing this table to have nullable foreign keys): +-----------+ | xRef | +-----------+ | Table1Key | | Table2Key | | Table3Key | | RiskKey | +-----------+ I want hbm2ddl to create the following 3 tables so that there are no nullable foreign keys. +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ | xRef1 | | xRef2 | | xRef3 | +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ | Table1Key | | Table2Key | | Table3Key | | RiskKey | | RiskKey | | RiskKey | +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+

    Read the article

  • How to set two column unique in SQL.

    - by sxingfeng
    I am creating a table ,in the table two column is unique, I mean columnA and columnB do not have same value: such as : Table X A B 1 2(RIGHT,unique) 2 2(RIGHT, unique) 1 3(RIGHT, not unique) 2 3(RIGHT, not unique) 1 2 (WRONG, not unique) How to create such a table? many thanks!

    Read the article

  • SQLAlchemy - select for update example

    - by Mark
    I'm looking for a complete example of using select for update in SQLAlchemy, but haven't found one googling. I need to lock a single row and update a column, the following code doesn't work (blocks forever): s = table.select(table.c.user=="test",for_update=True) u = table.update().where(table.c.user=="test") u.execute(email="foo") Do I need a commit? How do I do that? As far as I know you need to: begin transaction select ... for update update commit

    Read the article

  • Bound DataGridView not updating data source

    - by Max Yaffe
    I'm trying to bind a table of structures to a DataGridView. Loading and viewing the table is working fine but I can't edit a value and get it stored back into the table. Here's what I'm doing. I have a "primitive" data type, Real defined by public struct MyReal:IMyPrimative { public Double m_Real; //... public MyReal(String val) { m_Real = default(Double); Init(val); } //... } It gets used in a structure: public struct MyReal_Record : IMyRecord { public MyReal Freq { get; set;} MyReal_Record(String[] vals) { Init(vals); } } And the structure is used to define a table using a generic Binding List public class MyTable<S> : BindingList<S> where S: struct, IMyRecord { public Type typeofS; public MyTable() { typeofS = typeof(S); // ... } This table is used as a binding source for a grid, dynamically. private void miLoadFile_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { MyModel.Table<Real_Record> RTable = new MyModel.Table<Real_Record>(); //... Table initialized here //set up grid with virtual mode dataGridView1.DataSource = RTable; } All of this works fine and I can create RTable, initialize it and display it in a grid. The grid allows editing and has events set for CellParsing and CellFormatting which look like: private void dataGridView1_CellFormatting(object sender, DataGridViewCellFormattingEventArgs e) { if (e.DesiredType != typeof(String)) return; e.Value = e.Value.ToString(); } private void dataGridView1_CellParsing(object sender, DataGridViewCellParsingEventArgs e) { if (e.DesiredType != typeof(MyReal)) return; e.Value = new MyReal(e.Value.ToString()); e.ParsingApplied = true; this.dataGridView1.UpdateCellValue(e.ColumnIndex, e.RowIndex); } When I edit a value in a cell, I can change the text. On leaving the cell, CellParsing fires and the event handler is called. Everything seems to be correct going into the CellParsing handler. e.DesiredType is MyReal. e.Value is a string with the new value. After the new MyReal is created from the string, e.Value is set correctly. RowIndex and ColumnIndex are correct. ReadOnly is set false. However, when I leave the cell, the system restores the original value to the cell. I thought the UpdateCellValue would replace the value in the dataSource but I seem to be missing something. What did I miss? Thanks, Max

    Read the article

  • programming question

    - by shivam
    using System; using System.Data; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Drawing; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; using System.Data.SqlClient; namespace datasynchronization { public partial class Form1 : Form { public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { string connectString = @"Data Source=MOON\SQL2005;Initial Catalog=databaseA;Integrated Security=True"; using (var srcCon = new SqlConnection(connectString)) //connection to source table { srcCon.Open();//source table connection open SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand();// sqlobject for source table cmd.Connection = srcCon; string connectionString = @"Data Source=MOON\SQL2005;Initial Catalog=databaseB;Integrated Security=True"; using (var tgtCon = new SqlConnection(connectionString)) //connection to target table { tgtCon.Open(); //target table connection open SqlCommand objcmd1 = new SqlCommand();//sqlobject for target table objcmd1.Connection = tgtCon; objcmd1.CommandText = "SELECT MAX(date) FROM Table_2"; //query to findout the max date from target table var maxdate = objcmd1.ExecuteScalar(); // store the value of max date into the variable maxdate cmd.CommandText = string.Format("SELECT id,date,name,city,salary,region FROM Table_1 where date >'{0}'", maxdate); //select query to fetch rows from source table using (var reader = cmd.ExecuteReader()) { SqlCommand objcmd = new SqlCommand(); objcmd.Connection = tgtCon; objcmd.CommandText = "INSERT INTO Table_2(id,date,name,city,salary,region)VALUES(@id,@date,@name,@city,@salary,@region)"; objcmd.Parameters.Add("@id", SqlDbType.Int); objcmd.Parameters.Add("@date", SqlDbType.DateTime); objcmd.Parameters.Add("@name", SqlDbType.NVarChar); objcmd.Parameters.Add("@city", SqlDbType.NVarChar); objcmd.Parameters.Add("@salary", SqlDbType.Int); objcmd.Parameters.Add("@region", SqlDbType.Char); while (reader.Read()) { var order1 = reader[0].ToString(); var order2 = reader[1].ToString(); var order3 = reader[2].ToString(); var order4 = reader[3].ToString(); var order5 = reader[4].ToString(); var order6 = reader[5].ToString(); objcmd.Parameters["@id"].Value = order1; objcmd.Parameters["@date"].Value = order2; objcmd.Parameters["@name"].Value = order3; objcmd.Parameters["@city"].Value = order4; objcmd.Parameters["@salary"].Value = order5; objcmd.Parameters["@region"].Value = order6; objcmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); } } tgtCon.Close(); } srcCon.Close(); } } } } how can i organize the above written code in an efficient way?

    Read the article

  • Ajax load div , part of CSS not working

    - by user225228
    Hello, I'm using the ajax to load a div content, but the div content is not taking the CSS of the page. Example :- This link will load into <a href="#" onclick="javascript:loadAjax('test.html')">Test</a> <div id="result"> <table class="tablesorter"> <thead> <tr> <th>Header 1</th><th>Header 2</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td>Record 1</td><td>Desc 1</td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> In my CSS : table.tablesorter thead tr th, table.tablesorter tfoot tr th { background-color: #e6EEEE; border: 1px solid #FFF; font-size: 8pt; padding: 4px; } table.tablesorter thead tr .header { background-image: url(bg.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-position: center right; cursor: pointer; } In my test.html, it's the same table with different record : <table class="tablesorter"> <thead> <tr> <th>Header 1</th><th>Header 2</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td>Record 2</td><td>Desc 2</td></tr> </tbody> </table> The issue I'm facing is that before "test.html" is load, the CSS is fine. But after clicking on the link which suppose to loads test.html, the CSS background still shows but "cursor:pointer" and "background-image" not longer works. What should I do to make it work? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • c# Counter requires 2 button clicks to update

    - by marko.ivanovski.nz
    Hi, I have a problem that has been bugging me all day. In my code I have the following: private int rowCount { get { return (int)ViewState["rowCount"]; } set { ViewState["rowCount"] = value; } } and a button event protected void addRow_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { rowCount = rowCount + 1; } Then on Page_Load I read that value and create controls accordingly. I understand the button event fires AFTER the Page_Load fires so the value isn't updated until the next postback. Real nightmare. Here's the entire code: protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { string xmlValue = ""; //To read a value from a database if (xmlValue.Length > 0) { if (!Page.IsPostBack) { DataSet ds = XMLToDataSet(xmlValue); Table dimensionsTable = DataSetToTable(ds); tablePanel.Controls.Add(dimensionsTable); DataTable dt = ds.Tables["Dimensions"]; rowCount = dt.Rows.Count; colCount = dt.Columns.Count; } else { tablePanel.Controls.Add(DataSetToTable(DefaultDataSet(rowCount, colCount))); } } else { if (!Page.IsPostBack) { rowCount = 2; colCount = 4; } tablePanel.Controls.Add(DataSetToTable(DefaultDataSet(rowCount, colCount))); } } protected void submit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { resultsLabel.Text = Server.HtmlEncode(DataSetToStringXML(TableToDataSet((Table)tablePanel.Controls[0]))); } protected void addColumn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { colCount = colCount + 1; } protected void addRow_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { rowCount = rowCount + 1; } public DataSet TableToDataSet(Table table) { DataSet ds = new DataSet(); DataTable dt = new DataTable("Dimensions"); ds.Tables.Add(dt); //Add headers for (int i = 0; i < table.Rows[0].Cells.Count; i++) { DataColumn col = new DataColumn(); TextBox headerTxtBox = (TextBox)table.Rows[0].Cells[i].Controls[0]; col.ColumnName = headerTxtBox.Text; col.Caption = headerTxtBox.Text; dt.Columns.Add(col); } for (int i = 0; i < table.Rows.Count; i++) { DataRow valueRow = dt.NewRow(); for (int x = 0; x < table.Rows[i].Cells.Count; x++) { TextBox valueTextBox = (TextBox)table.Rows[i].Cells[x].Controls[0]; valueRow[x] = valueTextBox.Text; } dt.Rows.Add(valueRow); } return ds; } public Table DataSetToTable(DataSet ds) { DataTable dt = ds.Tables["Dimensions"]; Table newTable = new Table(); //Add headers TableRow headerRow = new TableRow(); for (int i = 0; i < dt.Columns.Count; i++) { TableCell headerCell = new TableCell(); TextBox headerTxtBox = new TextBox(); headerTxtBox.ID = "HeadersTxtBox" + i.ToString(); headerTxtBox.Font.Bold = true; headerTxtBox.Text = dt.Columns[i].ColumnName; headerCell.Controls.Add(headerTxtBox); headerRow.Cells.Add(headerCell); } newTable.Rows.Add(headerRow); //Add value rows for (int i = 0; i < dt.Rows.Count; i++) { TableRow valueRow = new TableRow(); for (int x = 0; x < dt.Columns.Count; x++) { TableCell valueCell = new TableCell(); TextBox valueTxtBox = new TextBox(); valueTxtBox.ID = "ValueTxtBox" + i.ToString() + i + x + x.ToString(); valueTxtBox.Text = dt.Rows[i][x].ToString(); valueCell.Controls.Add(valueTxtBox); valueRow.Cells.Add(valueCell); } newTable.Rows.Add(valueRow); } return newTable; } public DataSet DefaultDataSet(int rows, int cols) { DataSet ds = new DataSet(); DataTable dt = new DataTable("Dimensions"); ds.Tables.Add(dt); DataColumn nameCol = new DataColumn(); nameCol.Caption = "Name"; nameCol.ColumnName = "Name"; nameCol.DataType = System.Type.GetType("System.String"); dt.Columns.Add(nameCol); DataColumn widthCol = new DataColumn(); widthCol.Caption = "Width"; widthCol.ColumnName = "Width"; widthCol.DataType = System.Type.GetType("System.String"); dt.Columns.Add(widthCol); if (cols > 2) { DataColumn heightCol = new DataColumn(); heightCol.Caption = "Height"; heightCol.ColumnName = "Height"; heightCol.DataType = System.Type.GetType("System.String"); dt.Columns.Add(heightCol); } if (cols > 3) { DataColumn depthCol = new DataColumn(); depthCol.Caption = "Depth"; depthCol.ColumnName = "Depth"; depthCol.DataType = System.Type.GetType("System.String"); dt.Columns.Add(depthCol); } if (cols > 4) { int newColCount = cols - 4; for (int i = 0; i < newColCount; i++) { DataColumn newCol = new DataColumn(); newCol.Caption = "New " + i.ToString(); newCol.ColumnName = "New " + i.ToString(); newCol.DataType = System.Type.GetType("System.String"); dt.Columns.Add(newCol); } } for (int i = 0; i < rows; i++) { DataRow newRow = dt.NewRow(); newRow["Name"] = "Name " + i.ToString(); newRow["Width"] = "Width " + i.ToString(); if (cols > 2) { newRow["Height"] = "Height " + i.ToString(); } if (cols > 3) { newRow["Depth"] = "Depth " + i.ToString(); } dt.Rows.Add(newRow); } return ds; } public DataSet XMLToDataSet(string xml) { StringReader sr = new StringReader(xml); DataSet ds = new DataSet(); ds.ReadXml(sr); return ds; } public string DataSetToStringXML(DataSet ds) { XmlDocument _XMLDoc = new XmlDocument(); _XMLDoc.LoadXml(ds.GetXml()); StringWriter sw = new StringWriter(); XmlTextWriter xw = new XmlTextWriter(sw); XmlDocument xml = _XMLDoc; xml.WriteTo(xw); return sw.ToString(); } private int rowCount { get { return (int)ViewState["rowCount"]; } set { ViewState["rowCount"] = value; } } private int colCount { get { return (int)ViewState["colCount"]; } set { ViewState["colCount"] = value; } } Thanks in advance, Marko

    Read the article

  • What is the right way to structure HTML and CSS?

    - by Meke
    So, I'm a script monkey at the core. Lately I seem to get stuffed into doing design too for some odd reason and, well, let's just say I should probably have studied better. Either way - What I ask is, what's the Right way to structure a website? This one has a header with links, then a block with tabs, right under another block which consists of two parts and under those a few others who I'm not at yet. However, the thing is, I need to make a block that consists of two parts that are in the same box but structured independently. I'll try to draw it up. Browser window..................-[]X ------------------------------------ |.................Header Links Here| ||Tab|Tab|Tab|_____________........| ||Tab content.............|Small...| ||........................|Section.| ||---Line signing new section------| ||........................|Another.| ||..Content Area..........|Small...| ||........................|Section.| ------------------------------------ My issue is in the division of small sections and tab/content areas. I tried using floats, making them as tables, aligning and whatnot. The putting float:left on both tables worked. Kinda. Until I tried to resize the window. So, how do you PROPERLY structure a site like this? three divs and tables? Something else? I'll clarify this again: It's the Code to use to create the look above that I'm trying to figure out the proper way to do, not the design As requested here's the current structure I have <div class="container"> <div class="topBlock"> //Header Links Here </div> <div class="inputBlock"> <ul id="tabs"> <li><a href="#strict">Strict</a></li> <li><a href="#flex">Flex</a></li> <li><a href="#multiStep">Multi-Step</a></li> </ul> <div id="strict" class="tabContent"> <table class="tableLeft"> <tr> <td>From</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input id="inputBlockFrom" type="text" placeholder="FROM"/></td> </tr> <tr> <td>To</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input id="inputBlockTo" type="text" placeholder="TO"/></td> </tr> </table> <table class="tableRight"> <tr> <td>Leave</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input id="inputBlockLeave" type="text" name="leave" placeholder="LEAVE"/></td> <td><input id="inputBlockOne" type="radio" name="one"/></td> <td>One</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Return</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input id="inputBlockReturn" type="text" name="return" placeholder="RETURN"/></td> <td><input id="inputBlockBut" type="radio" name="one" checked/></td> <td>Return</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input id="inputBlockSubmit" type="submit" value="Search"/></td> </tr> </table> </div> <div id="flex" class="tabContent"> Test Two </div> <div id="multiStep" class="tabContent"> Test Three </div> </div> <div class="mapBlock tabContent"> <table class="tableLeft"> <tr><td> <div id="map" class="google_map"></div> </td></tr> </table> <table class="tableRight smallTable"> <tr> <td>Distance</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[-------------|------------]</td> //Slider to be </tr> </table> <table class="tableRight smallTable"> <tr> <td>Choice / Choice</td> </tr> </table> <table class="tableRight"> <tr> <td>Show:</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input type="radio"/></td> <td>Price</td> <td><input type="radio"/></td> <td>Button!</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input type="radio"/></td> </tr> <tr> <td><input type="radio"/></td> </tr> </table> </div> </div> </body> Sorry if it's messed up in the whitespacing somewhere.. The CSS: body { font-size: 80%; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; background-color: #e2edff; } .container { margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px; padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px; } .pageBlock { /* To future me: This class is for One Full Screen ideas */ min-height: 300px; } .topBlock { text-align: right; color: #000000; } .topBlock a { text-decoration: none; color: #000000; } .tableLeft { width: 75%; float: left; border-right: dotted 2px black; } .tableRight { float: left; overflow: auto; } .smallTable { border-bottom: 1px dotted #c9c3ba; } .google_map { height: 270px; width: 100%; }

    Read the article

  • CakePHP: How can I change this find call to include all records that do not exist in the associated

    - by Stephen
    I have a few tables with the following relationships: Company hasMany Jobs, Employees, and Trucks, Users I've got all my foreign keys set up properly, along with the tables' Models, Controllers, and Views. Originally, the Jobs table had a boolean field called "assigned". The following find operation (from the JobsController) successfully returns all employees, all trucks, and any jobs that are not assigned and fall on a certain day for a single company (without returning users by utilizing the containable behavior): $this->set('resources', $this->Job->Company->find('first', array( 'conditions' => array( 'Company.id' => $company_id ), 'contain' => array( 'Employee', 'Truck', 'Job' => array( 'conditions' => array( 'Job.assigned' => false, 'Job.pickup_date' => date('Y-m-d', strtotime('Today')); ) ) ) ))); Now, since writing this code, I decided to do a lot more with the job assignments. So I've created a new model "Assignment" that belongsTo Truck and belongsTo Job. I've added the hasMany Assignments to both the Truck model and the Jobs Model. I have both foreign keys in the assignments table, along with some other assignment fields. Now, I'm trying to get the same information above, only instead of checking the assigned field from the job table, I want to check the assignments table to ensure that the job does not exist there. I can no longer use the containable behavior if I'm going to use the "joins" feature of the find method due to mysql errors (according to the cookbook). But, the following query returns all jobs, even if they fall on different days. $this->set('resources', $this->Job->Company->find('first', array( 'joins' => array( array( 'table' => 'employees', 'alias' => 'Employee', 'type' => 'LEFT', 'conditions' => array( 'Company.id = Employee.company_id' ) ), array( 'table' => 'trucks', 'alias' => 'Truck', 'type' => 'LEFT', 'conditions' => array( 'Company.id = Truck.company_id' ) ), array( 'table' => 'jobs', 'alias' => 'Job', 'type' => 'LEFT', 'conditions' => array( 'Company.id = Job.company_id' ) ), array( 'table' => 'assignments', 'alias' => 'Assignment', 'type' => 'LEFT', 'conditions' => array( 'Job.id = Assignment.job_id' ) ) ), 'conditions' => array( 'Job.pickup_date' => $day, 'Company.id' => $company_id, 'Assignment.job_id IS NULL' ) )));

    Read the article

  • simple php Dollar $ evaluation in string questions

    - by Mirage
    I have always been confused that .e,g in php i have sql statement $qry = "select * from table where id = $id"; now can i insert "$" directly inside the quotes or i have to use $qry = "select * from table where id =".$id." "; or $qry = 'select * from table where id = $id'; or $qry = 'select * from table where id = '$id''; Which is correct

    Read the article

  • Updating DetailViewController from RootController

    - by Stefano Salmaso
    I'm trying to create an iPad application with a similar user interface to Apple's Mail application, i.e: RootView controller (table view) on the left hand side of the split view for navigation with a multiple view hierarchy. When a table cell is selected a new table view is pushed on the left hand side The new view on the left side can update the detail view. I can accomplish both tasks BUT NOT TOGETHER. I mean I can make a multi-level table view in the RootController.(HERE you can find the working source code). Or I can make a single-level table view in the RootController which can update the detailViewController (here there is the source code:http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D6L0463G). Can anyone tell me how to make a multi-level table in the RootController which can update a detailViewController? There is more source code at the link but below is the method in which I presume I have to declare a new detailViewController (which has to be put in the UISplitViewController): - (void)tableView:(UITableView *)TableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath { NSDictionary *dictionary = [self.tableDataSource objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]; //Get the children of the present item. NSArray *Children = [dictionary objectForKey:@"Children"]; // if([Children count] == 0) { /* Create and configure a new detail view controller appropriate for the selection. */ NSUInteger row = indexPath.row; UIViewController <SubstitutableDetailViewController> *detailViewController = nil; if (row == 0) { FirstDetailViewController *newDetailViewController = [[FirstDetailViewController alloc]initWithNibName:@"FirstDetailView" bundle:nil]; detailViewController = newDetailViewController; } if (row == 1) { SecondDetailViewController *newDetailViewController = [[SecondDetailViewController alloc]initWithNibName:@"SecondDetailView" bundle:nil]; detailViewController = newDetailViewController; } // Update the split view controller's view controllers array. NSArray *viewControllers = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:self.navigationController, detailViewController, nil]; splitViewController.viewControllers = viewControllers//nothing happens..... [viewControllers release];// } else { //Prepare to tableview. RootViewController *rvController = [[RootViewController alloc]initWithNibName:@"RootViewController" bundle:[NSBundle mainBundle]]; //Increment the Current View rvController.current_level += 1; //Set the title; rvController.current_title = [dictionary objectForKey:@"Title"]; //Push the new table view on the stack [self.navigationController pushViewController:rvController animated:YES]; rvController.tableDataSource = Children; [rvController.tableView reloadData]; //without this instrucion,items won't be loaded inside the second level of the table [rvController release]; } }

    Read the article

  • How to hide certain elements on a page using jQuery

    - by Ankur
    I am trying to implement something that is similar to a faceted search. My data is a series of objects and relationships. The idea is that you click an object (in this case "95 Theses" and then the possibly relationships are displayed, in this case "author" and clicking the relationship shows the object that matches the relationship, in this case "Martin Luther". My clicking of objects and relationsips (predicates) works fine. What I need to do is allow users to click an object or relationship and have all those that extend from it removed. This is what I thought of adding when a object or relationship 'tag' is clicked (every time I add another object or relationship I increment the global attribute called 'level'): if($(".objHolder,. preHolder").filter("[level>'"+level+"']").filter("[holderId='"+holderId+"']").length) { $(".objHolder,. preHolder").filter("[level>'"+level+"']").filter("[holderId='"+holderId+"']").remove(); } <table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2"> <tbody><tr> <td class="objHolder" objid="1" holderid="1" level="1"> <table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2"> <tbody><tr class="objItemRow" objid="1" holderid="1" level="1"> <td class="objItem" objid="1" holderid="1" level="2" bgcolor="#eeeeee" nowrap="nowrap">95 Theses</td> </tr></tbody> </table></td> <td><img src="images/right.jpg" alt="" height="10" width="16"></td> <td class="preHolder" level="2" holderid="1"> <table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2"><tbody> <tr><td class="preItem" level="3" subid="1" preid="1" holderid="1" bgcolor="#eeeeee" nowrap="nowrap">author</td></tr> </tbody></table></td> <td><img src="images/right.jpg" alt="" height="10" width="16"></td> <td class="objHolder" level="3" holderid="1"> <table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2"><tbody><tr><td class="objItem" level="4" objid="3" holderid="1" bgcolor="#eeeeee" nowrap="nowrap">Martin Luther</td></tr></tbody></table> </td> </tr></tbody> </table>

    Read the article

  • SQL to search duplicates

    - by Ram
    I have a table for animals like Lion Tiger Elephant Jaguar List item Cheetah Puma Rhino I want to insert new animals in this table and I am t reading the animal names from a CSV file. Suppose I got following names in the file Lion,Tiger,Jaguar as these animals are already in "Animals" table, What should be a single SQL query that will determine if the animals are already exist in the table.

    Read the article

  • Generated queries contain schema and catalog name

    - by stacker
    I've the same problem as described here In the generated SQL Informix expects catalog:schema.table but what's actually generated is catalog.schema.table which leads to a syntax error. Setting: hibernate.default_catalog= hibernate.default_schema= had no effect. I even removed schema and catalog from the table annotation, this caused a different issues : the query looked like that ..table same for setting catalog and schema to an empty string. Versions seam 2.1.2 Hibernate Annotations 3.3.1.GA.CP01 Hibernate 3.2.4.sp1.cp08 Hibernate EntityManager 3.3.2.GAhibernate Jboss 4.3 (similar to 4.2.3)

    Read the article

  • Insert a Join Statement - (Insert Data to Multiple Tables) - C#/SQL/T-SQL/.NET

    - by peace
    I have a Winform that has fields need to be filled by a user. All the fields doesn't belong to one table, the data will go to Customer table and CustomerPhone table, so i decided to do multiple inserts. I will insert appropriate data to CustomerPhone first then Insert the rest data to Customer table. Is it possible to Join an Insert OR Insert a Join? If show me a rough sample, i will be grateful. Many Thanks

    Read the article

  • Where clause in Fluent NHibernate Many-to-Many

    - by Adam Albrecht
    I am trying to setup a many-to-many mapping in Fluent Nhibernate that has a where clause attached to the child table. This is basically how it should work: HasManyToMany(p => p.Images) .Table("ProductImages") .ParentKeyColumn("ProductID") .ChildKeyColumn("ImageID") .Where("ImageTypeID = 2"); The ImageTypeID column is in the Images table, but NHibernate is assuming it is part of the ProductImages table. Any idea how I can specify this? Thanks!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251  | Next Page >