Search Results

Search found 37348 results on 1494 pages for 'agile project management'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 25/1494 | < Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >

  • How to plan a PHP based project with DB involved in the below scenario? [closed]

    - by San
    I'm starting a project on web monitoring where other websites can be monitored. Recently, I have found codeIgniter, yii, kohana frameworks online, but I'm confused as to whether to choose any of those or start directly. Moreover, this is my first big project that I'm planning for. So can anyone give me suggestions on how to start, how to plan, what books to refer to, to start this kind of web application and share some links to understand for myself on how to work on this project?

    Read the article

  • steps to take to be a pro leader for a php project

    - by Mac Taylor
    hey guys its been 4 years im developing a php project with my friends as a team . but in our history we did not use any opensource project management tool actualy im the leader of this project but never learnt how to manage a project with svn tools everytime i went for svn and management tools , i confused more and more where should i begin and what steps should i take to be a pro leader and manage a opensource project perfectly

    Read the article

  • Knowledge and user generated content management system to track files, research, proposals, etc.?

    - by Eshwar
    I'll try keep it short. Here's the scenario: We have employees all over the world performing similar work i.e. research, generating powerpoint slides, word documents, graphics, etc. Many times a lot of this previous work can be reused for another future project. The current arrangement is email and phone calls which as you would agree is quick if you know where to look but otherwise archaic and very very inefficient. So I am looking for software that will allow me to do the following: Tag files e.g. an investor presentation on cellphone usage in kenya would be tagged investor, cellphone, kenya Manage references e.g. if we read something on the internet, should be able to paste that link in some fashion and tag it as above. Preferably cloud based so that it can be accessed by anybody and additionally would be nice (though NOT must) to have access levels (director, manager, everyone) A nice interface that non technically savvy folks can warm up to ;) A desktop app would be handy so that people don't always have to click upload or something A tree based system is inefficient in this case because content is usually linked across branches and also people might not quite agree on one format of a tree. Tagging works around this very nicely. What I have considered so far: Evernote (for its more professional look) Springpad (for its versatility with content) Mendeley (this is a research manager and in some ways ideal, but i fear its limited to PDFs) The goal is that when somebody wants to look for a document, they don't have to ask a colleague, they can just search with keywords and all relevant information shows up. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Which software do you use for SCRUM ?

    - by Rahul Soni
    I checked wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrum_(development) But I am still looking for some insight from the genius minds using SO. I installed Microsoft Project 2010, and was assuming that it would have some template/plugin that would support SCRUM. Unfortunately, I couldn't find one :-(

    Read the article

  • Project Management Helps AmeriCares Deliver International Aid

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
    Excerpt from PROFIT - ORACLE - by Alison Weiss Handle with Care Sound project management helps AmeriCares bring international aid to those in need. The stakes are always high for AmeriCares. On a mission to restore health and save lives during times of disaster, the nonprofit international relief and humanitarian aid organization delivers donated medicines, medical supplies, and humanitarian aid to people in the U.S. and around the globe. Founded in 1982 with the express mission of responding as quickly and efficiently as possible to help people in need, the Stamford, Connecticut-based AmeriCares has delivered more than US$10.5 billion in aid to 147 countries over the past three decades. Launch the Slideshow “It’s critically important to us that we steward all the donations and that the medical supplies and medicines get to people as quickly as possible with no loss,” says Kate Sears, senior vice president for finance and technology at AmeriCares. “Whether we’re shipping IV solutions to victims of cholera in Haiti or antibiotics to Somali famine victims, we need to get the medicines there sooner because it means more people will be helped and lives improved or even saved.” Ten years ago, the tracking systems used by AmeriCares associates were paper-based. In recent years, staff started using spreadsheets, but the tracking processes were not standardized between teams. “Every team was tracking completely different information,” says Megan McDermott, senior associate, Sub-Saharan Africa partnerships, at AmeriCares. “It was just a few key things. For example, we tracked the date a shipment was supposed to arrive and the date we got reports from our partner that a hospital received aid on their end.” While the data was accurate, much detail was being lost in the process. AmeriCares management knew it could do a better job of tracking this enterprise data and in 2011 took a significant step by implementing Oracle’s Primavera P6 Professional Project Management. “It’s a comprehensive solution that has helped us improve the monitoring and controlling processes. It has allowed us to do our distribution better,” says Sears. In addition, the implementation effort has been a change agent, helping AmeriCares leadership rethink project management across the entire organization. Initially, much of the focus was on standardizing processes, but staff members also learned the importance of thinking proactively to prevent possible problems and evaluating results to determine if goals and objectives are truly being met. Such data about process efficiency and overall results is critical not only to AmeriCares staff but also to the donors supporting the organization’s life-saving missions. Efficiency Saves Lives One of AmeriCares’ core operations is to gather product donations from the private sector, establish where the most-urgent needs are, and solicit monetary support to send the aid via ocean cargo or airlift to welfare- and health-oriented nongovernmental organizations, hospitals, health networks, and government ministries based in areas in need. In 2011 alone, AmeriCares sent more than 3,500 shipments to 95 countries in response to both ongoing humanitarian needs and more than two dozen emergencies, including deadly tornadoes and storms in the U.S. and the devastating tsunami in Japan. When it comes to nonprofits in general, donors want to know that the charitable organizations they support are using funds wisely. Typically, nonprofits are evaluated by donors in terms of efficiency, an area where AmeriCares has an excellent reputation: 98 percent of expenses go directly to supporting programs and less than 2 percent represent administrative and fundraising costs. Donors, however, should look at more than simple efficiency, says Peter York, senior partner and chief research and learning officer at TCC Group, a nonprofit consultancy headquartered in New York, New York. They should also look at whether organizations have the systems in place to sustain their missions and continue to thrive. An expert on nonprofit organizational management, York has spent years studying sustainable charitable organizations. He defines them as nonprofits that are able to achieve the ongoing financial support to stay relevant and continue doing core mission work. In his analysis of well over 2,500 larger nonprofits, York has found that many are not sustaining, and are actually scaling back in size. “One of the biggest challenges of nonprofit sustainability is the general public’s perception that every dollar donated has to go only to the delivery of service,” says York. “What our data shows is that there are some fundamental capacities that have to be there in order for organizations to sustain and grow.” York’s research highlights the importance of data-driven leadership at successful nonprofits. “You’ve got to have the tools, the systems, and the technologies to get objective information on what you do, the people you serve, and the results you’re achieving,” says York. “If leaders don’t have the knowledge and the data, they can’t make the strategic decisions about programs to take organizations to the next level.” Historically, AmeriCares associates have used time-tested and cost-effective strategies to ship and then track supplies from donation to delivery to their destinations in designated time frames. When disaster strikes, AmeriCares ships by air and generally pulls out all the stops to deliver the most urgently needed aid within the first few days and weeks. Then, as situations stabilize, AmeriCares turns to delivering sea containers for the postemergency and ongoing aid so often needed over the long term. According to McDermott, getting a shipment out the door is fairly complicated, requiring as many as five different AmeriCares teams collaborating together. The entire process can take months—from when products are received in the warehouse and deciding which recipients to allocate supplies to, to getting customs and governmental approvals in place, actually shipping products, and finally ensuring that the products are received in-country. Delivering that aid is no small affair. “Our volume exceeds half a billion dollars a year worth of donated medicines and medical supplies, so it’s a sizable logistical operation to bring these products in and get them out to the right place quickly to have the most impact,” says Sears. “We really pride ourselves on our controls and efficiencies.” Adding to that complexity is the fact that the longer it takes to deliver aid, the more dire the human need can be. Any time AmeriCares associates can shave off the complicated aid delivery process can translate into lives saved. “It’s really being able to track information consistently that will help us to see where are the bottlenecks and where can we work on improving our processes,” says McDermott. Setting a Standard Productivity and information management improvements were key objectives for AmeriCares when staff began the process of implementing Oracle’s Primavera solution. But before configuring the software, the staff needed to take the time to analyze the systems already in place. According to Greg Loop, manager of database systems at AmeriCares, the organization received guidance from several consultants, including Rich D’Addario, consulting project manager in the Primavera Global Business Unit at Oracle, who was instrumental in shepherding the critical requirements-gathering phase. D’Addario encouraged staff to begin documenting shipping processes by considering the order in which activities occur and which ones are dependent on others to get accomplished. This exercise helped everyone realize that to be more efficient, they needed to keep track of shipments in a more standard way. “The staff didn’t recognize formal project management methodology,” says D’Addario. “But they did understand what the most important things are and that if they go wrong, an entire project can go off course.” Before, if a boatload of supplies was being sent to Haiti and there was a problem somewhere, a lot of time was taken up finding out where the problem was—because staff was not tracking things in a standard way. As a result, even more time was needed to find possible solutions to the problem and alert recipients that the aid might be delayed. “For everyone to put on the project manager hat and standardize the way every single thing is done means that now the whole organization is on the same page as to what needs to occur from the time a hurricane hits Haiti and when a boat pulls in to unload supplies,” says D’Addario. With so much care taken to put a process foundation firmly in place, configuring the Primavera solution was actually quite simple. Specific templates were set up for different types of shipments, and dashboards were implemented to provide executives with clear overviews of every project in the system. AmeriCares’ Loop reports that system planning, refining, and testing, followed by writing up documentation and training, took approximately four months. The system went live in spring 2011 at AmeriCares’ Connecticut headquarters. While the nonprofit has an international presence, with warehouses in Europe and offices in Haiti, India, Japan, and Sri Lanka, most donated medicines come from U.S. entities and are shipped from the U.S. out to the rest of the world. In addition, all shipments are tracked from the U.S. office. AmeriCares doesn’t expect the Primavera system to take months off the shipping time, especially for sea containers. However, any time saved is still important because it will allow aid to be delivered to people more quickly at a lower overall cost. “If we can trim a day or two here or there, that can translate into lives that we’re saving, especially in emergency situations,” says Sears. A Cultural Change Beyond the measurable benefits that come with IT-driven process improvement, AmeriCares management is seeing a change in culture as a result of the Primavera project. One change has been treating every shipment of aid as a project, and everyone involved with facilitating shipments as a project manager. “This is a revolutionary concept for us,” says McDermott. “Before, we were used to thinking we were doing logistics—getting a container from point A to point B without looking at it as one project and really understanding what it meant to manage it.” AmeriCares staff is also happy to report that collaboration within the organization is much more efficient. When someone creates a shipment in the Primavera system, the same shared template is used, which means anyone can log in to the system to see the status of a shipment. Knowledgeable staff can access a shipment project to help troubleshoot a problem. Management can easily check the status of projects across the organization. “Dashboards are really useful,” says McDermott. “Instead of going into the details of each project, you can just see the high-level real-time information at a glance.” The new system is helping team members focus on proactively managing shipments rather than simply reacting when problems occur. For example, when a container is shipped, documents must be included for customs clearance. Now, the shipping template has built-in reminders to prompt team members to ask for copies of these documents from freight forwarders and to follow up with partners to discover if a shipment is on time. In the past, staff may not have worked on securing these documents until they’d been notified a shipment had arrived in-country. Another benefit of capturing and adopting best practices within the Primavera system is that staff training is easier. “Capturing the processes in documented steps and milestones allows us to teach new staff members how to do their jobs faster,” says Sears. “It provides them with the knowledge of their predecessors so they don’t have to keep reinventing the wheel.” With the Primavera system already generating positive results, management is eager to take advantage of advanced capabilities. Loop is working on integrating the company’s proprietary inventory management system with the Primavera system so that when logistics or warehousing operators input data, the information will automatically go into the Primavera system. In the past, this information had to be manually keyed into spreadsheets, often leading to errors. Mining Historical Data Another feature on the horizon for AmeriCares is utilizing Primavera P6 Professional Project Management reporting capabilities. As the system begins to include more historical data, management soon will be able to draw on this information to conduct analysis that has not been possible before and create customized reports. For example, at the beginning of the shipment process, staff will be able to use historical data to more accurately estimate how long the approval process should take for a particular country. This could help ensure that food and medicine with limited shelf lives do not get stuck in customs or used beyond their expiration dates. The historical data in the Primavera system will also help AmeriCares with better planning year to year. The nonprofit’s staff has always put together a plan at the beginning of the year, but this has been very challenging simply because it is impossible to predict disasters. Now, management will be able to look at historical data and see trends and statistics as they set current objectives and prepare for future need. In addition, this historical data will provide AmeriCares management with the ability to review year-end data and compare actual project results with goals set at the beginning of the year—to see if desired outcomes were achieved and if there are areas that need improvement. It’s this type of information that is so valuable to donors. And, according to York, project management software can play a critical role in generating the data to help nonprofits sustain and grow. “It is important to invest in systems to help replicate, expand, and deliver services,” says York. “Project management software can help because it encourages nonprofits to examine program or service changes and how to manage moving forward.” Sears believes that AmeriCares donors will support the return on investment the organization will achieve with the Primavera solution. “It won’t be financial returns, but rather how many more people we can help for a given dollar or how much more quickly we can respond to a need,” says Sears. “I think donors are receptive to such arguments.” And for AmeriCares, it is all about the future and increasing results. The project management environment currently may be quite simple, but IT staff plans to expand the complexity and functionality as the organization grows in its knowledge of project management and the goals it wants to achieve. “As we use the system over time, we’ll continue to refine our best practices and accumulate more data,” says Sears. “It will advance our ability to make better data-driven decisions.”

    Read the article

  • Using the Microsoft Ajax Minifier with Web Setup project & Source Control

    - by Rob
    I've just started investigating the Microsoft Ajax Minifer 4.0 for use with a Visual Studio 2008 Web Application I work on. It's proven easy enough to hook it into the .csproj file so it produced .min.js files for all scripts, however I'm stumped as to how to integrate this with the Web Setup project & Source Control. Essentially what I want to do is have the resultant .min.js files included in the Web Setup project without having them included in Source Control because: Having to check them out prior to the build being executing is a pain (the minifier cannot modify them if they're not checked out). As they're created as a "build artifact" it just seems wrong to have them stored under source control. The only option I've managed to come across so far is to explicitly include the .min.js files as part of the Setup project by right clicking on the Web Setup project and choosing "Add File", and then having the relevant folder hierarchy duplicated in "File System on Target Machine" so that I can force the file to the correct location. This is neither elegant or simple/robust as: It requires me to manually add every minified js file to the Web Setup project by hand Maintain a copy of the relevant directory structure in both the Web Application project and the Web Setup project Remember to add any new js files minified versions to the Web Setup project Is there a better way of doing this?

    Read the article

  • How do you remind your Scrum Product Owner about his promises/actions?

    - by Felix Ogg
    ** EDIT: Rephrased the question to re-focus ** Our Scrum team meets as seldomly as possible, but we meet with the product owner every chance we get. We track everyone's agreed action points (particularly theirs). We are 100% agile, but our product owner lives in traditional world, we remain off-site. We facilitate him in crossing over to our fast-paced world. There's not much wrong. The team and the PO are in good spirits. PO is present at every meeting and positively energized. Just imagine this person as a 70 year old, slow grandpa, who is forgetful, yet kind. In reality he isn't, but he is used to a working environment (public servants) that is much slooooower. Manyana-manyana etc. It is frustrating for my team to cooperate: PO lives in a non-prioritized environment, and everyone in it has learned the productivity-technique of NGTD (Not Getting Things Done). He WANTS to, it's just that he forgets or 'sinks' somewhere along the away. We have experimented with a text file, maintained by the Scrum master (low-tech), which he broadcasts by e-mail every day JIRA, our issue tracker. Turns out this is nice for programmers, but too steep for 'regular people' I Googled for Issue tracking webtools but came up empty handed: All tools are aimed at IT issue tracking, instead of meeting action point tracking/planning for mere mortals. I did find TODO-lists like RememberTheMilk, but they don't track comments, and - to be honest - I doubt we could get our product owner to use it (too complicated). We have three requirements: Register action points, assign to a team member and a deadline Offer anyone to 'comment' on progress of any action point Do not build our own tool from scratch We do not need: - impressive authorization models, - multi-project, - workflow, - crosslinking. Is there any trick/tool you use to assist your product owner 'fly' like the rest of the rest of the team? Communication before tools I agree with the general consensus that one should not try to apply technology to a communication problem, however in this case I am merely looking for a tool to save me time in setting up prioritized lists. I found www.thymer.com today, may be what I am looking for. The guys are cool. It is getting rather feature-bloated though.

    Read the article

  • Project Management

    - by user311188
    Hi: I've seen a lot of project managers but I don't have one that have all this features ... do you know any ? (if possible open source) project management (for multiple projects) task assignations or ticket system task owner or task creator says ESTIMATION each user has his own dashboard with "my tasks of today" gantt graphs thank you

    Read the article

  • Centralized Windows/Mac Patch Management that is easy to use

    - by BiggsTRC
    I'm looking for advice on what patch management solutions you would recommend based upon your experience. I'm also looking for which ones you would not recommend based upon your experience. We have a mixed network of Windows and Mac clients. Our central servers are all Windows servers, although I have considered putting in a Mac server to better handle our Mac clients. The issue we are facing currently is that we need to maintain the patches on all of our third-party applications. Right now we use WSUS, which handles with patching of Windows and some Microsoft products but that is about it. I need something to cover the other applications, specifically things like Adobe products (Reader, Flash, Dreamweaver, etc.) Our network isn't that big (maybe 200 clients) and I don't have a person to dedicate just to patching and maintaining a patch management solution. Thus very large and complicated solutions like System Center are most likely out. I have recently been looking at Dell's Kace K1000 solution (http://www.kace.com/products/systems-management-appliance/). It seems simple and it provides a lot of tools in one package that I would like/need as well. I like the fact that it is self-contained in an appliance and that it is designed for solutions like mine. However, I'm not sure if this is the best solution. I've also looked some at Shavlik's Netchk solution (http://www.shavlik.com/netchk-protect.aspx) but I don't need an anti-virus product. However, it looks like they might have a very good patch database. My question is this: What are your thoughts on these to products? Are there better products out there? Are there issues that I'm not considering? I want something that is very good at patching a broad range of products, that is simple to use, that takes a minimal amount of management (like WSUS), and that (hopefully) works with Mac and Windows.

    Read the article

  • SQL SERVER – Another lesser known feature of SQL Server Management Studio 2012 – Guest Post by Balmukund Lakhani

    - by Pinal Dave
    This is a fantastic blog post from my dear friend Balmukund ( blog | twitter | facebook ). He had presented a fantastic session in our last UG and there were lots of requests from attendees that he blogs about it. Well, here is the blog post about the same very popular UG session. Let us read the entire blog post in the voice of the Balmukund himself. In one of my previous guest blog on SQL Authority, I wrote about “Additional Connection Parameter” tab of login screen in SQL Server Management Studio (a.k.a. SSMS). On the similar lines, this blog is going to show little less known new feature of login main screen (“Connect to Server”) of SSMS 2012. You might have seen below screen countless times and you might wonder what is there is blog about in this simple screen. Well, continue reading and you would get the answer. Many times, DBA have to login to production server from non-regular machine, may be a developer’s workstation. Once you login to SQL, do your work and close the management studio. Do you know that your server name is saved in management studio? Of course, very useful feature because you may not like to type server name/IP address every time. Whatever servers you have connected, it would be stored by management studio. But sometime, it’s annoying! What you would do if you want SQL Server Management Studio to forget “all” the servers listed in drop down of Server name? To do that, you need to know how and where it’s stored. You can use one of my favorite tool from sysinternals called Process Monitor (also known as ProcMon) and easily figure out that this is stored in a file under your windows user profile. Below is the file in SQL 2008 R2 Management Studio. %appdata%\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Shell\SqlStudio.bin For SQL Server 2012, here is what we can see in ProcMon So, the path is %appdata%\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Tools\Shell\SqlStudio.bin So far, you might wonder, where is the new feature? I have been asked by many users to delete entries from SSMS “Connect to Server” server name list. Well, unofficially, you can delete the file directly which we found via ProcMon. Note that delete file to get rid of server list is not officially supported by Microsoft. Better way to achieve this is provided in SSMS 2012. To delete the servers from the list, highlight the name we want to delete (via keyboard or mouse) and then press delete key via keyboard. We can’t be multi-select and has to be done one by one. We can delete as many entries we want. I have delete few from first screenshot taken and here is the modified version. This is not available in SQL 2008 R2 and its previous version. This came from feedback given to SQL Server Product group. Hope you have learned something new today! Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.sqlauthority.com) Filed under: PostADay, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Query, SQL Server, SQL Server Management Studio, SQL Tips and Tricks, T SQL, Technology

    Read the article

  • Five Ideas: Project Management

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
     Except from Profit Magazine “For everyone to put on the project manager hat and standardize the way every single thing is done means that now the whole organization is on the same page as to what needs to occur from the time a hurricane hits Haiti and when a boat pulls in to unload supplies.” —Rich D’Addario, consulting project manager in the Primavera Global Business Unit at Oracle, on helping AmeriCares deliver aid to Haiti “Primavera P6 Analytics generates information that can help organizations improve their utilization and trim down overall operating costs. But more importantly, it gives organizations improved visibility.” —Yasser Mahmud, vice president of product strategy and industry marketing in Oracle’s Primavera Global Business Unit “Organizations are constantly looking for ways to improve the speed and precision of their decisions and work without creating environments and systems that limit their personnel through rigid structures and inflexible processes. The latest release of Primavera Portfolio Management meets this demand by further streamlining processes and supporting enhanced decision-making, helping drive better value from portfolios. In addition, the new UI clearly demonstrates Oracle's commitment to providing a seamlessly integrated enterprise project portfolio management product suite.” —Mike Sicilia, senior vice president, Oracle's Primavera “Make it a business project, not an IT project. All levels of functional management must have ownership, responsibility, and accountability for the success of the implementation.” —from Eaton Operations Services Manager Marcos Baccetto's 9 Project Management Tips “AEC firms must strategically pursue standardization opportunities in the project management area while preserving the spirit of entrepreneurism and flexibility at an individual project manager level. An enterprise technology platform doesn't only help with standardization of key project management processes across the enterprise; it also improves performance management, team collaboration and client specific reporting at an individual project level.” —Maneesh Chhabra is a director of Industry Strategy and Insight at Oracle

    Read the article

  • Selling an open source project: some issues

    - by Sander
    I am the creator / main developer of a small sized open source (PHP) project (GPL3). Currently there is a development team of 3 people (me included). This team has been quite active for some time, but since almost 2 years not much has happened. I myself have decided I want to stop working on the project, but I can't just leave the project because I care about it and I know if I abandon it, it will just be a matter of time before the project completely dies. At this moment, there are still some users and the project is only slightly out-of-date. So I'm thinking about selling the whole project. Of course I'd need to get consent of the other developers, but for now I'm assuming that's not a big problem. So at this moment I have 2 questions: 1) If the project would be sold to a commercial party, would it be possible for them to convert the project to closed source? I would prefer to sell the project to a company/organization that would continue the development under an open source license. 2) Does anyone have any tips to find interested parties? I don't know if I just want to put up a "For Sale" sign on the website of the project. Maybe someone has experience with a comparable situation. Ok guys, thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Discovering Your Project

    - by Tim Murphy
    The discovery phase of any project is both exciting and critical to the project’s success.  There are several key points that you need to keep in mind as you navigate this process. The first thing you need to understand is who the players in the project are and what their motivations are for the project.  Leaving out a key stakeholder in the resulting product is one of the easiest ways to doom your project to fail.  The better the quality of the input you have at this early phase the better chance you will have of creating a well accepted deliverable. The next task you should tackle is to gather the goals for the project.  Specifically, what does the company expect to get for the money they are about to layout.  This seems like a common sense task, but you would be surprised how many teams to straight to building the system.  Even if you are following an agile methodology I believe that this is critical. Inventorying the resources that already exists gives you an idea what you are going to have to build and what you can leverage at lower risk.  This list should include documentation, servers, code repositories, databases, languages, security systems and supporting teams.  All of these are “resources” that can effect the cost and delivery schedule of your project. Finally, you need to verify what you have found and documented with the stakeholders and subject matter experts.  Documentation that has not been reviewed is actually a list of assumptions and we all know that assumptions are the mother of all screw ups. If you give the discovery phase of your project the attention that it deserves your project has a much better chance of success. I would love to hear what other people find important for this phase.  Please leave comments on this post so we can share the knowledge. del.icio.us Tags: Project discovery,documentation,business analysis,architecture

    Read the article

  • Windows Server Configuration Management Best Practices

    - by Anton Gogolev
    Chef/Pupper/Ansible are cool and all, but they are second-class citizens on Windows at best. We have a bunch of "snowflake" (one of a kind) machines (baremetal and virtual) that nobody really know what's going on with. What I want is to start establishing basic configuration management for said servers, starting from installing Windows, installing and enabling various Roles and Features, setting up Services, Shares, Users and deploying webapps. PowerShell DSC looks promising, but it's not yet here and appears to be over-engineered, Puppet and the like are again not first-class. There's a bunch of tooks and TLAs like Windows ADK, DISM, OCSetup, etc. and it seems to me that the "Configuration Management" story on Windows is not precisely rainbows and unicorns. What I want is a Puppet/Chef-like, lightweight tool (no System Center Configuration Management, please) which would allow us to "version-control our server infrastructure" and bring all the benefits of CM. So, where do I look for the tool that does this kind of thing?

    Read the article

  • Beyond Cloud Technology, Enabling A More Agile and Responsive Organization

    - by sxkumar
    This is the second part of the blog “Clouds, Clouds Everywhere But not a Drop of Rain”. In the first part,  I was sharing with you how a broad-based transformation makes cloud more than a technology initiative, I will describe in this section how it requires people (organizational) and process changes as well, and these changes are as critical as is the choice of right tools and technology. People: Most IT organizations have a fairly complex organizational structure. There are different groups, managing different pieces of the puzzle, and yet, they don't always work together. Provisioning a new application therefore may require a request to float endlessly through system administrators, DBAs and middleware admin worlds – resulting in long delays and constant finger pointing.  Cloud users expect end-to-end automation - which requires these silos to be greatly simplified, if not completely eliminated.  Most customers I talk to acknowledge this problem but are quick to admit that such a transformation is hard. As hard as it may be, I am afraid that the status quo is no longer an option. Sticking to an organizational structure that was created ages back will not only impede cloud adoption,  it also risks making the IT skills increasingly irrelevant in a world that is rapidly moving towards converged applications and infrastructure.   Process: Most IT organizations today operate with a mindset that they must fully "control" access to any and all types of IT services. This in turn leads to people clinging on to outdated manual approval processes .  While requiring approvals for scarce resources makes sense, insisting that every single request must be manually approved defeats the very purpose of cloud. Not only this causes delays, thereby at least partially negating the agility benefits, it also results in gross inefficiency. In a cloud environment, self-service access should be governed by policies, quotas that the administrators can define upfront . For a cloud initiative to be successful, IT organizations MUST be ready to empower users by giving them real control rather than insisting on brokering every single interaction between users and the cloud resources. Technology: From a technology perspective, cloud is about consolidation, standardization and automation. A consolidated and standardized infrastructure helps increase utilization and reduces cost. Additionally, it  enables a much higher degree of automation - thereby providing users the required agility while minimizing operational costs.  Obviously, automation is the key to cloud. Unfortunately it hasn’t received as much attention within enterprises as it should have.  Many organizations are just now waking up to the criticality of automation and it still often gets relegated to back burner in favor of other "high priority" projects. However, it is important to understand that without the right type and level of automation, cloud will remain a distant dream for most enterprises. This in turn makes the choice of the cloud management software extremely critical.  For a cloud management software to be effective in an enterprise environment, it must meet the following qualifications: Broad and Deep Solution It should offer a broad and deep solution to enable the kind of broad-based transformation we are talking about.  Its footprint must cover physical and virtual systems, as well as infrastructure, database and application tiers. Too many enterprises choose to equate cloud with virtualization. While virtualization is a critical component of a cloud solution, it is just a component and not the whole solution. Similarly, too many people tend to equate cloud with Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS). While it is perfectly reasonable to treat IaaS as a starting point, it is important to realize that it is just the first stepping stone - and on its own it can only provide limited business benefits. It is actually the higher level services, such as (application) platform and business applications, that will bring about a more meaningful transformation to your enterprise. Run and Manage Efficiently Your Mission Critical Applications It should not only be able to run your mission critical applications, it should do so better than before.  For enterprises, applications and data are the critical business assets  As such, if you are building a cloud platform that cannot run your ERP application, it isn't truly a "enterprise cloud".  Also, be wary of  vendors who try to sell you the idea that your applications must be written in a certain way to be able to run on the cloud. That is nothing but a bogus, self-serving argument. For the cloud to be meaningful to enterprises, it should adopt to your applications - and not the other way around.  Automated, Integrated Set of Cloud Management Capabilities At the root of many of the problems plaguing enterprise IT today is complexity. A complex maze of tools and technology, coupled with archaic  processes, results in an environment which is inflexible, inefficient and simply too hard to manage. Management tool consolidation, therefore, is key to the success of your cloud as tool proliferation adds to complexity, encourages compartmentalization and defeats the very purpose that you are building the cloud for. Decision makers ought to be extra cautious about vendors trying to sell them a "suite" of disparate and loosely integrated products as a cloud solution.  An effective enterprise cloud management solution needs to provide a tightly integrated set of capabilities for all aspects of cloud lifecycle management. A simple question to ask: will your environment be more or less complex after you implement your cloud? More often than not, the answer will surprise you.  At Oracle, we have understood these challenges and have been working hard to create cloud solutions that are relevant and meaningful for enterprises.  And we have been doing it for much longer than you may think. Oracle was one of the very first enterprise software companies to make our products available on the Amazon Cloud. As far back as in 2007, we created new cloud solutions such as Cloud Database Backup that are helping customers like Amazon save millions every year.  Our cloud solution portfolio is also the broadest and most deep in the industry  - covering public, private, hybrid, Infrastructure, platform and applications clouds. It is no coincidence therefore that the Oracle Cloud today offers the most comprehensive set of public cloud services in the industry.  And to a large part, this has been made possible thanks to our years on investment in creating cloud enabling technologies. I will dedicated the third and final part of the blog “Clouds, Clouds Everywhere But not a Drop of Rain” to Oracle Cloud Technologies Building Blocks and how they mapped into our vision of Enterprise Cloud. Stay Tuned.

    Read the article

  • How can I setup dependencies for Axis2 / Axiom on Maven2

    - by ronaldocpontes
    I've tried the following settings on pom.xml to use Axis2 wsdl2code: <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.axis2</groupId> <artifactId>axis2</artifactId> <version>1.5.1</version> </dependency> </dependencies> ... <build> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.axis2</groupId> <artifactId>axis2-wsdl2code-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.5.1</version> <executions> <execution> <goals> <goal>wsdl2code</goal> </goals> <configuration> <packageName>com.site.package</packageName> <wsdlFile>http://www.site.com/api/v2_soap?wsdl=1</wsdlFile> <databindingName>xmlbeans</databindingName> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> ... </plugins> ... </build> Whenever I run mvn clean, I get the following warnings with a ClassNotFoundException showing no signs of org.apache.axiom. [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:pom:1.4.9:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\codehaus\plexus\plexus-utils\1.4.9\plexus-utils-1.4.9.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api:pom:2.0.7:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\maven-plugin-api\2.0.7\maven-plugin-api-2.0.7.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.maven:maven-artifact:pom:2.0.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.maven:maven-artifact at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\maven-artifact\2.0.8\maven-artifact-2.0.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.maven:maven-project:pom:2.0.7:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.maven:maven-project at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\maven-project\2.0.7\maven-project-2.0.7.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache

    Read the article

  • How to convert a winforms project to wpf project

    - by mblaze
    I converted a Winforms project by hand-editing the proj file. Changed project type guids and added an application definition section, and now I can add WPF Windows, Pages, etc. to the project. One thing that doesn't work is, the files I added do not have autogenerated cs files, and every new window component are missing their InitializeComponent method. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • NetBeans behaves differently if project is run via "Run Project" or build.xml>run

    - by Rogach
    I slightly modified the build-impl.xml file of my NetBeans project. (Specifically, I made it to insert build time into program code). If I run project via build.xml "run" target, I get behavior I expect - the program displays build time and date. But if I run project using standard (and most obvious, used it always) button "Run Main Project", I get totally another result (no build date). Moreover, if I insert any code into build.xml, I still get result if I run the target explicitly and no result if it is run simply by NetBeans. And this leads me to conclusion, that this button uses another method to run my application. My question is: what does that button do? What method does it call? And can it be configured to run the needed target of make file?

    Read the article

  • Generate POCO classes in different project to the project with Entity Framework model

    - by Max
    I'm trying to use the Repository Pattern with EF4 using VS2010. To this end I am using POCO code generation by right clicking on the entity model designer and clicking Add code generation item. I then select the POCO template and get my classes. What I would like to be able to do is have my solution structured into separate projects for Entity (POCO) classes and another project for the entity model and repository code. This means that my MVC project could use the POCO classes for strongly typed views etc and not have to know about the repository or have to have a reference to it. To plug it all together I will have another separate project with interfaces and use IoC. Sounds good in my head I just don't know how to generate the classes into their own project! I can copy them and then change the namespaces on them but I wanted to avoid manual work whenever I change the schema in the db and want to update my model. Thanks

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >