Search Results

Search found 46070 results on 1843 pages for 'project management tools'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 25/1843 | < Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >

  • Getting SQL Server Compact 4.0 Tools CTP2

    - by sinni800
    Hello. I'm currently trying to install the "new" Microsoft WebMatrix Beta 2 (a web programming IDE). I was trying to use Web Platform Installer for this. But it 404's on the SQL Compact 4.0 CPT2 and it's tools. I was able to get the runtime from the Microsoft downloads page but the tools I am not able to find. I can not install WebMatrix because the tools are a prerequisite. Does anybody know where to get them from now?

    Read the article

  • Project Management

    - by user311188
    Hi: I've seen a lot of project managers but I don't have one that have all this features ... do you know any ? (if possible open source) project management (for multiple projects) task assignations or ticket system task owner or task creator says ESTIMATION each user has his own dashboard with "my tasks of today" gantt graphs thank you

    Read the article

  • Recommended programming language for linux server management and web ui integration

    - by Brendan Martens
    I am interested in making an in house web ui to ease some of the management tasks I face with administrating many servers; think Canonical's Landscape. This means doing things like, applying package updates simultaneously across servers, perhaps installing a custom .deb (I use ubuntu/debian.) Reviewing server logs, executing custom scripts, viewing status information for all my servers. I hope to be able to reuse existing command line tools instead of rewriting the exact same operations in a different language myself. I really want to develop something that allows me to continue managing on the ssh level but offers the power of a web interface for easily applying the same infrastructure wide changes. They should not be mutually exclusive. What are some recommended programming languages to use for doing this kind of development and tying it into a web ui? Why do you recommend the language(s) you do? I am not an experienced programmer, but view this as an opportunity to scratch some of my own itches as well as become a better programmer. I do not care specifically if one language is harder than another, but am more interested in picking the best tools for the job from the beginning. Feel free to recommend any existing projects that already integrate management of many systems into a single cohesive web ui, except Landscape (not free,) Ebox (ebox control center not free) and webmin (I don't like it, feels clunky and does not integrate well with the "debian way" of maintaining a server, imo. Also, only manages one system.) Thanks for any ideas! Update: I am not looking to reinvent the wheel of systems management, I just want to "glue" many preexisting and excellent tools together where possible and appropriate; this is why I wonder about what languages can interact well with pre-existing command line tools, while making them manageable with a web ui.

    Read the article

  • Centralized Windows/Mac Patch Management that is easy to use

    - by BiggsTRC
    I'm looking for advice on what patch management solutions you would recommend based upon your experience. I'm also looking for which ones you would not recommend based upon your experience. We have a mixed network of Windows and Mac clients. Our central servers are all Windows servers, although I have considered putting in a Mac server to better handle our Mac clients. The issue we are facing currently is that we need to maintain the patches on all of our third-party applications. Right now we use WSUS, which handles with patching of Windows and some Microsoft products but that is about it. I need something to cover the other applications, specifically things like Adobe products (Reader, Flash, Dreamweaver, etc.) Our network isn't that big (maybe 200 clients) and I don't have a person to dedicate just to patching and maintaining a patch management solution. Thus very large and complicated solutions like System Center are most likely out. I have recently been looking at Dell's Kace K1000 solution (http://www.kace.com/products/systems-management-appliance/). It seems simple and it provides a lot of tools in one package that I would like/need as well. I like the fact that it is self-contained in an appliance and that it is designed for solutions like mine. However, I'm not sure if this is the best solution. I've also looked some at Shavlik's Netchk solution (http://www.shavlik.com/netchk-protect.aspx) but I don't need an anti-virus product. However, it looks like they might have a very good patch database. My question is this: What are your thoughts on these to products? Are there better products out there? Are there issues that I'm not considering? I want something that is very good at patching a broad range of products, that is simple to use, that takes a minimal amount of management (like WSUS), and that (hopefully) works with Mac and Windows.

    Read the article

  • SQL SERVER – Another lesser known feature of SQL Server Management Studio 2012 – Guest Post by Balmukund Lakhani

    - by Pinal Dave
    This is a fantastic blog post from my dear friend Balmukund ( blog | twitter | facebook ). He had presented a fantastic session in our last UG and there were lots of requests from attendees that he blogs about it. Well, here is the blog post about the same very popular UG session. Let us read the entire blog post in the voice of the Balmukund himself. In one of my previous guest blog on SQL Authority, I wrote about “Additional Connection Parameter” tab of login screen in SQL Server Management Studio (a.k.a. SSMS). On the similar lines, this blog is going to show little less known new feature of login main screen (“Connect to Server”) of SSMS 2012. You might have seen below screen countless times and you might wonder what is there is blog about in this simple screen. Well, continue reading and you would get the answer. Many times, DBA have to login to production server from non-regular machine, may be a developer’s workstation. Once you login to SQL, do your work and close the management studio. Do you know that your server name is saved in management studio? Of course, very useful feature because you may not like to type server name/IP address every time. Whatever servers you have connected, it would be stored by management studio. But sometime, it’s annoying! What you would do if you want SQL Server Management Studio to forget “all” the servers listed in drop down of Server name? To do that, you need to know how and where it’s stored. You can use one of my favorite tool from sysinternals called Process Monitor (also known as ProcMon) and easily figure out that this is stored in a file under your windows user profile. Below is the file in SQL 2008 R2 Management Studio. %appdata%\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Shell\SqlStudio.bin For SQL Server 2012, here is what we can see in ProcMon So, the path is %appdata%\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Tools\Shell\SqlStudio.bin So far, you might wonder, where is the new feature? I have been asked by many users to delete entries from SSMS “Connect to Server” server name list. Well, unofficially, you can delete the file directly which we found via ProcMon. Note that delete file to get rid of server list is not officially supported by Microsoft. Better way to achieve this is provided in SSMS 2012. To delete the servers from the list, highlight the name we want to delete (via keyboard or mouse) and then press delete key via keyboard. We can’t be multi-select and has to be done one by one. We can delete as many entries we want. I have delete few from first screenshot taken and here is the modified version. This is not available in SQL 2008 R2 and its previous version. This came from feedback given to SQL Server Product group. Hope you have learned something new today! Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.sqlauthority.com) Filed under: PostADay, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Query, SQL Server, SQL Server Management Studio, SQL Tips and Tricks, T SQL, Technology

    Read the article

  • Silverlight and .NET 4 tools

    I've just added two new attributes to SharpToolbox.com: Built for Silverlight and Built for .NET 4. There are already more than 30 tools tagged as offering support for Silverlight, and 20 tools for .NET 4.You can search for tools, libraries and add-ins with these attributes using the search page. PS: if you have submitted tools, be patient, I have a lot to process......Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Five Ideas: Project Management

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
     Except from Profit Magazine “For everyone to put on the project manager hat and standardize the way every single thing is done means that now the whole organization is on the same page as to what needs to occur from the time a hurricane hits Haiti and when a boat pulls in to unload supplies.” —Rich D’Addario, consulting project manager in the Primavera Global Business Unit at Oracle, on helping AmeriCares deliver aid to Haiti “Primavera P6 Analytics generates information that can help organizations improve their utilization and trim down overall operating costs. But more importantly, it gives organizations improved visibility.” —Yasser Mahmud, vice president of product strategy and industry marketing in Oracle’s Primavera Global Business Unit “Organizations are constantly looking for ways to improve the speed and precision of their decisions and work without creating environments and systems that limit their personnel through rigid structures and inflexible processes. The latest release of Primavera Portfolio Management meets this demand by further streamlining processes and supporting enhanced decision-making, helping drive better value from portfolios. In addition, the new UI clearly demonstrates Oracle's commitment to providing a seamlessly integrated enterprise project portfolio management product suite.” —Mike Sicilia, senior vice president, Oracle's Primavera “Make it a business project, not an IT project. All levels of functional management must have ownership, responsibility, and accountability for the success of the implementation.” —from Eaton Operations Services Manager Marcos Baccetto's 9 Project Management Tips “AEC firms must strategically pursue standardization opportunities in the project management area while preserving the spirit of entrepreneurism and flexibility at an individual project manager level. An enterprise technology platform doesn't only help with standardization of key project management processes across the enterprise; it also improves performance management, team collaboration and client specific reporting at an individual project level.” —Maneesh Chhabra is a director of Industry Strategy and Insight at Oracle

    Read the article

  • How exactly is Google Webmaster Tools measuring "Site Performance"?

    - by Rémi
    I've been working for two months now on improving our response time (mainly server side) on a new forum (a brand new product on a technical point of view) we've launched in Germany a few month ago and I'm a lot surprised by the results I get. I monitor our response time using Apache logs and our own implementation of Boomerang beacon. Using my stats, I can see that our new product responds in about 680 ms where our old product was responding in about 1050 ms. On the other side, Google Webmaster Tool tells us that our pages have an average reponse time of about 1500 ms today where it was 700 three months ago with our old product. I've figured that GWT was taking client side metrics into account so I've added some measures on our Boomerang beacon and everything looks just fine. I've also ran some random pages on ySlow and Google's Page Speed and everything looks better than it was before. We event have a 82% on Google's Page Speed tool which is quite cool for a site with some ads in it :) Lately, we have signed a deal with Akamai to use two of their products : CDN for our static files (we were using another CDN before but it wasn't very effective) and RMA to improve Networks routes. We have also introduced a new agressive cache mecanism to ensure that most of the pages served to crawlers are cached by our memcache grid. After checking my metrics, it seems that this changes have improved from 650ms to about 500ms, which is good (still not great but it is definitly an improvement). But webmaster tools continues to report an increasing average response time where we see it decreasing in the same time. Have you ever had the same kind of wierd behavior on your sites while doing performance improvements ? Do you have any idea how to monitor the same thing Google does with Site Performance in Google Webmaster Tools so that we could improve our site and constantly check if it is what Google wants ? Edit 2011/07/26 : Thanks for your answers guys ! Nevertheless, I was not precise enough. The main issue we have is not with the Site Performance page but with the Crawl Stats one for now. We probably found an issue on our side with some very slow pages (around 3000 ms !!) and we are trying to fix them. I'll keep you posted as soon I'll have some infos. Thanks again !

    Read the article

  • Selling an open source project: some issues

    - by Sander
    I am the creator / main developer of a small sized open source (PHP) project (GPL3). Currently there is a development team of 3 people (me included). This team has been quite active for some time, but since almost 2 years not much has happened. I myself have decided I want to stop working on the project, but I can't just leave the project because I care about it and I know if I abandon it, it will just be a matter of time before the project completely dies. At this moment, there are still some users and the project is only slightly out-of-date. So I'm thinking about selling the whole project. Of course I'd need to get consent of the other developers, but for now I'm assuming that's not a big problem. So at this moment I have 2 questions: 1) If the project would be sold to a commercial party, would it be possible for them to convert the project to closed source? I would prefer to sell the project to a company/organization that would continue the development under an open source license. 2) Does anyone have any tips to find interested parties? I don't know if I just want to put up a "For Sale" sign on the website of the project. Maybe someone has experience with a comparable situation. Ok guys, thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Discovering Your Project

    - by Tim Murphy
    The discovery phase of any project is both exciting and critical to the project’s success.  There are several key points that you need to keep in mind as you navigate this process. The first thing you need to understand is who the players in the project are and what their motivations are for the project.  Leaving out a key stakeholder in the resulting product is one of the easiest ways to doom your project to fail.  The better the quality of the input you have at this early phase the better chance you will have of creating a well accepted deliverable. The next task you should tackle is to gather the goals for the project.  Specifically, what does the company expect to get for the money they are about to layout.  This seems like a common sense task, but you would be surprised how many teams to straight to building the system.  Even if you are following an agile methodology I believe that this is critical. Inventorying the resources that already exists gives you an idea what you are going to have to build and what you can leverage at lower risk.  This list should include documentation, servers, code repositories, databases, languages, security systems and supporting teams.  All of these are “resources” that can effect the cost and delivery schedule of your project. Finally, you need to verify what you have found and documented with the stakeholders and subject matter experts.  Documentation that has not been reviewed is actually a list of assumptions and we all know that assumptions are the mother of all screw ups. If you give the discovery phase of your project the attention that it deserves your project has a much better chance of success. I would love to hear what other people find important for this phase.  Please leave comments on this post so we can share the knowledge. del.icio.us Tags: Project discovery,documentation,business analysis,architecture

    Read the article

  • What are the tools, programming languages and development processes of AAA games?

    - by Pan.student
    Only thing I am able to find about "big" games like ac, hl, bf, cod is engine used to run the game. But I am interested in what software development methodology, programming and scripting languages were used. As well as tools for creating models, music, animations and other media. Further, were the team team organisations and so on for a certain game (or game series). Is this information even available to the public?

    Read the article

  • Windows Server Configuration Management Best Practices

    - by Anton Gogolev
    Chef/Pupper/Ansible are cool and all, but they are second-class citizens on Windows at best. We have a bunch of "snowflake" (one of a kind) machines (baremetal and virtual) that nobody really know what's going on with. What I want is to start establishing basic configuration management for said servers, starting from installing Windows, installing and enabling various Roles and Features, setting up Services, Shares, Users and deploying webapps. PowerShell DSC looks promising, but it's not yet here and appears to be over-engineered, Puppet and the like are again not first-class. There's a bunch of tooks and TLAs like Windows ADK, DISM, OCSetup, etc. and it seems to me that the "Configuration Management" story on Windows is not precisely rainbows and unicorns. What I want is a Puppet/Chef-like, lightweight tool (no System Center Configuration Management, please) which would allow us to "version-control our server infrastructure" and bring all the benefits of CM. So, where do I look for the tool that does this kind of thing?

    Read the article

  • Why are the stats for HTML Improvements in Google Webmaster Tools not decreasing?

    - by Kookoriko
    I have read that resolving HTML Improvements in Google Webmaster Tools can take as long as 6 weeks to show up, but those numbers seem to increase without decreasing even though I've been fixing almost everything that Google points out. I have checked some sites with the View as Google tool and the bugs are resolved (let's say "short meta descriptions" for example). Any idea why is this happening?

    Read the article

  • How can I setup dependencies for Axis2 / Axiom on Maven2

    - by ronaldocpontes
    I've tried the following settings on pom.xml to use Axis2 wsdl2code: <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.axis2</groupId> <artifactId>axis2</artifactId> <version>1.5.1</version> </dependency> </dependencies> ... <build> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.axis2</groupId> <artifactId>axis2-wsdl2code-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.5.1</version> <executions> <execution> <goals> <goal>wsdl2code</goal> </goals> <configuration> <packageName>com.site.package</packageName> <wsdlFile>http://www.site.com/api/v2_soap?wsdl=1</wsdlFile> <databindingName>xmlbeans</databindingName> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> ... </plugins> ... </build> Whenever I run mvn clean, I get the following warnings with a ClassNotFoundException showing no signs of org.apache.axiom. [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:pom:1.4.9:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\codehaus\plexus\plexus-utils\1.4.9\plexus-utils-1.4.9.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api:pom:2.0.7:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\maven-plugin-api\2.0.7\maven-plugin-api-2.0.7.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.maven:maven-artifact:pom:2.0.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.maven:maven-artifact at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\maven-artifact\2.0.8\maven-artifact-2.0.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.maven:maven-project:pom:2.0.7:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.maven:maven-project at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\maven-project\2.0.7\maven-project-2.0.7.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec\1.0.1\geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.pom [WARNING] POM for 'commons-io:commons-io:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project commons-io:commons-io at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\commons-io\commons-io\1.4\commons-io-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-api at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-api\1.2.8\axiom-api-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-impl at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-impl\1.2.8\axiom-impl-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom:pom:1.2.8:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache.ws.commons.axiom:axiom-dom at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\org\apache\ws\commons\axiom\axiom-dom\1.2.8\axiom-dom-1.2.8.pom [WARNING] POM for 'javax.mail:mail:pom:1.4:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project javax.mail:mail at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\javax\mail\mail\1.4\mail-1.4.pom [WARNING] POM for 'xalan:xalan:pom:2.7.0:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project xalan:xalan at C:\Users\Ronaldo.m2\repository\xalan\xalan\2.7.0\xalan-2.7.0.pom [WARNING] POM for 'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:pom:1.0.1:runtime' is invalid. It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. for project org.apache

    Read the article

  • How to convert a winforms project to wpf project

    - by mblaze
    I converted a Winforms project by hand-editing the proj file. Changed project type guids and added an application definition section, and now I can add WPF Windows, Pages, etc. to the project. One thing that doesn't work is, the files I added do not have autogenerated cs files, and every new window component are missing their InitializeComponent method. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • NetBeans behaves differently if project is run via "Run Project" or build.xml>run

    - by Rogach
    I slightly modified the build-impl.xml file of my NetBeans project. (Specifically, I made it to insert build time into program code). If I run project via build.xml "run" target, I get behavior I expect - the program displays build time and date. But if I run project using standard (and most obvious, used it always) button "Run Main Project", I get totally another result (no build date). Moreover, if I insert any code into build.xml, I still get result if I run the target explicitly and no result if it is run simply by NetBeans. And this leads me to conclusion, that this button uses another method to run my application. My question is: what does that button do? What method does it call? And can it be configured to run the needed target of make file?

    Read the article

  • Tools for conceptual website design

    - by Alex Tang
    What tools (apart from Visio) will generate visually pleasing website site maps or diagrams of a conceptual website? We want to present nice diagrams to our client, but we're unsure about where to get started—we're all coders, not designers. Visio shapes or stencils are quite old. What tools are others in the industry using?

    Read the article

  • Generate POCO classes in different project to the project with Entity Framework model

    - by Max
    I'm trying to use the Repository Pattern with EF4 using VS2010. To this end I am using POCO code generation by right clicking on the entity model designer and clicking Add code generation item. I then select the POCO template and get my classes. What I would like to be able to do is have my solution structured into separate projects for Entity (POCO) classes and another project for the entity model and repository code. This means that my MVC project could use the POCO classes for strongly typed views etc and not have to know about the repository or have to have a reference to it. To plug it all together I will have another separate project with interfaces and use IoC. Sounds good in my head I just don't know how to generate the classes into their own project! I can copy them and then change the namespaces on them but I wanted to avoid manual work whenever I change the schema in the db and want to update my model. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Grouping every 3 items in xslt 1.0

    - by Piotr Czapla
    I'm having troubles to figure out a way to group items xslt 1.0. I have a source xml similar to the one below: <client name="client A"> <project name = "project A1"/> <project name = "project A2"/> <project name = "project A3"/> <project name = "project A4"/> </client> <client name="client B"> <project name = "project B1"/> <project name = "project B2"/> </client> <client name="client C"> <project name = "project C1"/> <project name = "project C2"/> <project name = "project C3"/> </client> I'd like to select all projects, sort them and then group every 3 project in one boundle as in the example below: <boundle> <project name="project A1"> <project name="project A2"> <project name="project A3"> </boundle> <boundle> <project name="project A4"> <project name="project B1"> <project name="project B2"> </boundle> <boundle> <project name="project C1"> <project name="project C2"> <project name="project C3"> </boundle> Currently to do so I'm using to open a boundle tag and close it later. Can you think about any better solution?

    Read the article

  • Eclipse Plugin project with other project dependencies

    - by James
    I have an Eclipse plugin project, and it depends on other projects that I have in my Eclipse workspace. After adding the project dependencies under "Java Build Path" - "Projects" tab, and also selecting the project in the "Order and Export" I get a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError. I'm assuming that the other projects have not been properly included into the plugin. Does anyone know how to fix this? Thanks, James

    Read the article

  • Jython project in Eclipse can't find the Jython library, but works in an identical project

    - by Rob Lourens
    I have two projects in Eclipse with Java and Python code, using Jython. Also I'm using PyDev. One project can import and use the xml module just fine, and the other gives the error ImportError: No module named xml. As far as I can tell, all the project properties are set identically. The working project was created from scratch and the other comes from code checked out of an svn repository and put into a new project. What could be the difference?

    Read the article

  • Building a maven child project that depends on another projects child project with Bamboo

    - by kosoant
    I have two maven projects Project AAA * AAA-Core * AAA-Other Project BBB * BBB-Core * BBB-AAA-specific I want to create a build plan in Bamboo to build the BBB-AAA-specific project. The plan configuration is such that this project depends on the AAA-Other projec build. Thus everything should work ok. But when I try to run the BBB-AAA-specific Bamboo plan I get an error that states: "Unable to find resource 'foo.bar.AAA:AAA:pom:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT' in repository snapshots (http://foo.bar.com)" What is going on? The bamboo builds for "AAA-Core" and "AAA-Other" work as expected.

    Read the article

  • Why is IE developer tools so slow?

    - by Raisen
    I've used the developer tools on Chrome, FF and IE, and on IE, it's extremely slow. I was trying to debug iGoogle and it took about 3 minutes to even open the tools page. Can anyone confirm that it's that slow? It works fine on small websites though.

    Read the article

  • Developer workload management software: recommendations?

    - by PaddyC
    In my place, we use two issue tracking tools, one for production bugs, and another for issues on projects in development. These tools are good for managers. However, at an individual level, other work can also arrive through desk visits, email, or the phone, and those allocating the work aren't always interested in issue tracking systems. I've recently rolled off an 18-month project where I got into a cycle of overtime, and I found that I didn't always have good visibility of all work assigned to me. As a result, I was always very busy, and felt constantly laden down with work, but didn't have the clear data to show my manager (or, ironically, the time to stop and gather the information!). A handwritten list, updated at the end of each day, is a good start, but can anyone recommend better tools to help me get a clear view of my own workload? Ideally, I'm thinking of software tools for developers, which could incorporate estimates, but all suggestions welcome. Thanks, Paddy

    Read the article

  • Can't convert the PocketPC project in Visual Studio 2010 project format

    - by nihi_l_ist
    Just downloaded the Visual Studio 2010 Premium and realized that can't compile the project, made for PDA! The error log in output window says: Loading D:\Work...\PDA2.csproj ... D:\Work...\PDA2.csproj : error : The project file 'D:\Work...\PDA2.csproj' cannot be opened. The project type is not supported by this installation. I want to know if mobile development projects are supported in RTM version or they are deprecated?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >