Search Results

Search found 29508 results on 1181 pages for 'object initializers'.

Page 260/1181 | < Previous Page | 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267  | Next Page >

  • COM IUnknown and do I need a pointer to it first before calling CoGetClassObject?

    - by Tony
    In COM, when you want to create an instance of some COM Server object, do you first need to get a pointer to it's IUnknown interface and only then create a class object using CoGetClassObject? As far as I understand it, IUnknown is used to manage object lifetimes, so from my understanding, whatever object the client wants to create, one needs a pointer to it's IUnknown interface implementation first. Sound correct? If not, can anyone tell me how it works?

    Read the article

  • Finding objects in J2ME M3G

    - by Jani
    I'm using Blender to create m3g files and then I load them in a java program. Which is the best way to find an object in the World? Should I create separate classes for every object and then add them to one World object or should I assign IDs to the objects in Blender and find them in the program by ID? Or export every object to a separate M3G file? (Or some other way?)

    Read the article

  • echo XML values

    - by danit
    Here is my XML: object(SimpleXMLElement)#1 (2) { ["@attributes"]=> array(1) { ["type"]=> string(5) "array" } ["feed"]=> array(3) { [0]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#2 (6) { ["title"]=> string(34) "Twitter / Favorites from bob" ["id"]=> string(27) "tag:twitter.com,2007:Status" ["link"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#5 (1) { ["@attributes"]=> array(3) { ["type"]=> string(9) "text/html" ["href"]=> string(38) "http://twitter.com/bob/favorites" ["rel"]=> string(9) "alternate" } } [1]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#6 (1) { ["@attributes"]=> array(3) { ["type"]=> string(20) "application/atom+xml" ["href"]=> string(40) "http://twitter.com/favorites.atom?page=1" ["rel"]=> string(4) "self" } } } ["updated"]=> string(25) "2010-04-01T10:44:19+00:00" ["subtitle"]=> string(56) "Twitter updates favorited by Dan Humpherson / MoodleDan." ["entry"]=> array(20) { [0]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#7 (7) { ["title"]=> string(104) "smashingmag: Sikuli: a visual technology to search and automate GUIs using images - http://bit.ly/6ArwzP" ["content"]=> string(104) "smashingmag: Sikuli: a visual technology to search and automate GUIs using images - http://bit.ly/6ArwzP" ["id"]=> string(72) "tag:twitter.com,2007:http://twitter.com/smashingmag/statuses/11389386545" ["published"]=> string(25) "2010-03-31T22:06:41+00:00" ["updated"]=> string(25) "2010-03-31T22:06:41+00:00" ["link"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#27 (1) { ["@attributes"]=> array(3) { ["type"]=> string(9) "text/html" ["href"]=> string(51) "http://twitter.com/smashingmag/statuses/11389386545" ["rel"]=> string(9) "alternate" } } [1]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#28 (1) { ["@attributes"]=> array(3) { ["type"]=> string(10) "image/jpeg" ["href"]=> string(64) "http://a3.twimg.com/profile_images/572829723/original_normal.jpg" ["rel"]=> string(5) "image" } } } ["author"]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#29 (2) { ["name"]=> string(17) "Smashing Magazine" ["uri"]=> string(31) "http://www.smashingmagazine.com" } } For the life of me I cannot get my code to work, all I want to do is echo the entry->content string but no matter what I try I get nothing. Can anyone assist an inept PHP n00b?

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc session and custom MembershipProvider

    - by niao
    Greetings, in my ASP.NET MVC application I've created a custom MembershipProvider. It works fine, however when user is successfully logged, I would like to create an Operator object and make it possible to access this object on every controller and view. I was thinking about session to do this but when session expires this object is null but user that had been logged using MembershipProvider is still logged in. Is there any way I can store my Operator object in MembershipProvider and access it on every controller and view I need?

    Read the article

  • Retrieve jquery-ui dialog's div

    - by Hikari
    When we apply $().dialog() in an object, jquery-ui puts it inside a <div class="ui-dialog ui-widget">, with a <div class="ui-dialog-titlebar ui-widget-header"> before it. After the creation of this dialog around the main object, how can we get that ui-dialog object so that we can execute other JavaScript commands in it? The best I could do was use .parent(".ui-dialog") in the main object, is there a better way to do it?

    Read the article

  • Sorting and Re-arranging List of HashMaps

    - by HonorGod
    I have a List which is straight forward representation of a database table. I am trying to sort and apply some magic after the data is loaded into List of HashMaps. In my case this is the only hard and fast way of doing it becoz I have a rules engine that actually updates the values in the HashMap after several computations. Here is a sample data representation of the HashMap (List of HashMap) - {fromDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=21, toDate=Tue Mar 23 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=11, toDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=456} {fromDate=Sat Mar 20 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=20, toDate=Thu Apr 01 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Wed Mar 24 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=22, toDate=Sat Mar 27 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=11, toDate=Fri Mar 26 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Sat Mar 20 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=11, toDate=Wed Mar 31 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Mon Mar 15 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=12, toDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=567} I am trying to achieve couple of things - 1) Sort the list by actionId and eventId after which the data would look like - {fromDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=11, toDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=456} {fromDate=Mon Mar 15 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=12, toDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=567} {fromDate=Wed Mar 24 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=22, toDate=Sat Mar 27 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=21, toDate=Tue Mar 23 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Sat Mar 20 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=20, toDate=Thu Apr 01 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=11, toDate=Fri Mar 26 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} {fromDate=Sat Mar 20 10:54:12 EDT 2010, eventId=11, toDate=Wed Mar 31 10:54:12 EDT 2010, actionId=1234} 2) If we group the above list by actionId they would be resolved into 3 groups - actionId=1234, actionId=567 and actionId=456. Now here is my question - For each group having the same eventId, I need to update the records so that they have wider fromDate to toDate. Meaning, if you consider the last two rows they have same actionId = 1234 and same eventId = 11. Now we can to pick the least fromDate from those 2 records which is Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 and farther toDate which is Wed Mar 31 10:54:12 and update those 2 record's fromDate and toDate to Wed Mar 17 10:54:12 and Wed Mar 31 10:54:12 respectively. Any ideas? PS: I already have some pseudo code to start with. import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Calendar; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.Comparator; import java.util.Date; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.List; import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.CompareToBuilder; public class Tester { boolean ascending = true ; boolean sortInstrumentIdAsc = true ; boolean sortEventTypeIdAsc = true ; public static void main(String args[]) { Tester tester = new Tester() ; tester.printValues() ; } public void printValues () { List<HashMap<String,Object>> list = new ArrayList<HashMap<String,Object>>() ; HashMap<String,Object> map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(1234)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(21)) ; map.put("fromDate", getDate(1) ) ; map.put("toDate", getDate(7) ) ; list.add(map); map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(456)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(11)) ; map.put("fromDate", getDate(1)) ; map.put("toDate", getDate(1) ) ; list.add(map); map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(1234)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(20)) ; map.put("fromDate", getDate(4) ) ; map.put("toDate", getDate(16) ) ; list.add(map); map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(1234)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(22)) ; map.put("fromDate",getDate(8) ) ; map.put("toDate", getDate(11)) ; list.add(map); map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(1234)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(11)) ; map.put("fromDate",getDate(1) ) ; map.put("toDate", getDate(10) ) ; list.add(map); map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(1234)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(11)) ; map.put("fromDate",getDate(4) ) ; map.put("toDate", getDate(15) ) ; list.add(map); map = new HashMap<String,Object>(); map.put("actionId", new Integer(567)) ; map.put("eventId", new Integer(12)) ; map.put("fromDate", getDate(-1) ) ; map.put("toDate",getDate(1)) ; list.add(map); System.out.println("\n Before Sorting \n "); for(int j = 0 ; j < list.size() ; j ++ ) System.out.println(list.get(j)); Collections.sort ( list , new HashMapComparator2 () ) ; System.out.println("\n After Sorting \n "); for(int j = 0 ; j < list.size() ; j ++ ) System.out.println(list.get(j)); } public static Date getDate(int days) { Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance(); cal.setTime(new Date()); cal.add(Calendar.DATE, days); return cal.getTime() ; } public class HashMapComparator2 implements Comparator { public int compare ( Object object1 , Object object2 ) { if ( ascending == true ) { return new CompareToBuilder() .append(( ( HashMap ) object1 ).get ( "actionId" ), ( ( HashMap ) object2 ).get ( "actionId" )) .append(( ( HashMap ) object2 ).get ( "eventId" ), ( ( HashMap ) object1 ).get ( "eventId" )) .toComparison(); } else { return new CompareToBuilder() .append(( ( HashMap ) object2 ).get ( "actionId" ), ( ( HashMap ) object1 ).get ( "actionId" )) .append(( ( HashMap ) object2 ).get ( "eventId" ), ( ( HashMap ) object1 ).get ( "eventId" )) .toComparison(); } } } }

    Read the article

  • Transmitting complex objects using TCP in C#

    - by Rakesh K
    Hi, I have a client server application in which I need to transmit a user defined object from Client to Server using TCP connection. My object is of the following structure: class Conversation { private string convName, convOwner; public ArrayList convUsers; public string getConvName() { return this.convName; } public string getConvOwner() { return this.convOwner; } } Please help me how to trnasmit this object at from client and again de-serialize it into appropriate object at server side. Thanks, Rakesh K.

    Read the article

  • How to re-render the panel to different div when panel already render to some other div

    - by venkat
    I have created a Ext.Panel object, it rendered properly to specified div element on my page. I want to replace the panel object underlying element(previously rendered div element) to another div which will be identified dynamically. Here I don't want to create the Panel object once again by specifying identified div element, I need to make use of existing panel object and need to show the panel in the place where the identified div exists. Can any one helps me regarding this. Thanks Venkat

    Read the article

  • How to re-render the panel to different div when panel already render to some other div

    - by venkat
    I have created a Ext.Panel object, it rendered properly to specified div element on my page. I want to replace the panel object underlying element(previously rendered div element) to another div which will be identified dynamically. Here I don't want to create the Panel object once again by specifying identified div element, I need to make use of existing panel object and need to show the panel in the place where the identified div exists. Can any one helps me regarding this. Thanks Venkat

    Read the article

  • Binding functions of derived class with luabind

    - by Anamon
    I am currently developing a plugin-based system in C++ which provides a Lua scripting interface, for which I chose to use luabind. I'm using Lua 5 and luabind 0.9, both statically linked and compiled with MSVC++ 8. I am now having trouble binding functions with luabind when they are defined in a derived class, but not its parent class. More specifically, I have an abstract base class called 'IPlugin' from which all plugin classes inherit. When the plugin manager initialises, it registers that class and its functions like this: luabind::open(L); luabind::module(L) [ luabind::class_("IPlugin") .def("start", (void(IPlugin::*)())&IPlugin::start) ]; As it is only known at runtime what effective plugin classes are available, I had to solve loading plugins in a kind of roundabout way. The plugin manager exposes a factory function to Lua, which takes the name of a plugin class and a desired object name. The factory then creates the object, registers the plugin's class as inheriting from the 'IPlugin' base class, and immediately calls a function on the created object that registers itself as a global with the Lua state, like this: void PluginExample::registerLuaObject(lua_State *L, string a_name) { luabind::globals(L)[a_name] = (PluginExample*)this; } I initially did this because I had problems with Lua determining the most derived class of the object, as if I register it from the StreamManager it is only known as a subtype of 'IPlugin' and not the specific subtype. I'm not sure anymore if this is even necessary though, but it works and the created object is subsequently accessible from Lua under 'a_name'. The problem I have, though, is that functions defined in the derived class, which were not declared at all in the parent class, cannot be used. Virtual functions defined in the base class, such as 'start' above, work fine, and calling them from Lua on the new object runs the respective redefined code from the 'PluginExample' class. But if I add a new function to 'PluginExample', here for example a function taking no arguments and returning void, and register it like this: luabind::module(L) [ luabind::class_("PluginExample") .def(luabind::constructor()) .def("func", &PluginExample::func) ]; calling 'func' on the new object yields the following Lua runtime error: No matching overload found, candidates: void func(PluginExample&) I am correctly using the ':' syntax so the 'self' argument is not needed and it seems suddenly Lua cannot determine the derived type of the object anymore. I am sure I am doing something wrong, probably having to do with the two-step binding required by my system architecture, but I can't figure out where. I'd much appreciate some help =)

    Read the article

  • Proper way to use Linq with WPF

    - by Ingó Vals
    I'm looking for a good guide into the right method of using Linq to Sql together with WPF. Most guides only go into the bare basics like how to show data from a database but noone I found goes into how to save back to the database. Can you answer or point out to me a guide that can answer these questions. I have a separate Data project because the same data will also be used in a web page so I have the repository method. That means I have a seperate class that uses the DataContext and there are methods like GetAllCompanies() and GetCompanyById ( int id ). 1) Where there are collections is it best to return as a IQueryable or should I return a list? Inside the WPF project I have seen reccomendations to wrap the collection in a ObservabgleCollection. 2) Why should I use ObservableCollection and should I use it even with Linq / IQueryable Some properties of the linq entities should be editable in the app so I set them to two-way mode. That would change the object in the observableCollection. 3) Is the object in the ObservableCollection still a instance of the original linq entity and so is the change reflected in the database ( when submitchanges is called ) I should have somekind of save method in the repository. But when should I call it? What happens if someone edits a field but decides not to save it, goes to another object and edits it and then press save. Doesn't the original change also save? When does it not remember the changes to a linq entity object anymore. Should I instance the Datacontext class in each method so it loses scope when done. 4) When and how to call the SubmitChanges method 5) Should I have the DataContext as a member variable of the repository class or a method variable To add a new row I should create a new object in a event ( "new" button push ) and then add it to the database using a repo method. 6) When I add the object to the database there will be no new object in the ObservableCollection. Do I refresh somehow. 7) I wan't to reuse the edit window when creating new but not sure how to dynamically changing from referencing selected item from a listview to this new object. Any examples you can point out.

    Read the article

  • How do I call setattr() on the current module?

    - by Matt Joiner
    What do I pass as the first parameter "object" to the function setattr(object, name, value), to set variables on the current module? For example: setattr(object, "SOME_CONSTANT", 42); giving the same effect as: SOME_CONSTANT = 42 within the module containing these lines (with the correct object). I'm generate several values at the module level dynamically, and as I can't define __getattr__ at the module level, this is my fallback.

    Read the article

  • Struts2 data tranfer from Jsp to Action using Complex Objects

    - by indra
    Hi, how to use Model-driven or Object-backed approaches to map Complex Object with depth more than one. for example, I have action class with property User object and USer has a address object as its property. Address has street name as property. like .. User.address.streetName In JSP, using s:textfield or other tags how can I represent street name.? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Loading data in constructors and not in constructors [JAVA]

    - by Richeve S. Bebedor
    i just want to know the difference between loading the data inside the constructor and loading the data outside the constructor but not inside any methods example: Loading inside constructor public class Model{ Object testobject; public Model(){ testobject=new Object(); } } VS example: Loading outside constructor public class Model{ Object testobject=new Object(); public Model(){ } }

    Read the article

  • ByRef vs ByVal generates errors!?

    - by serhio
    ByRef vs ByVal generates errors!? I had a method that used an Object Function Foo(ByRef bar as CustomObject) as Boolean this method generated errors, because some strange .NET Runtime things changed the bar object, causing its Dispose()al. A lot of time spent to understand the thing(where the ... object is changed), until somebody replaced ByRef by ByVal and object wasn't change anymore when passing to this method... Somebody could explain this, what happens?

    Read the article

  • How to Work Around Limitations in Generic Type Constraints in C#?

    - by Jose
    Okay I'm looking for some input, I'm pretty sure this is not currently supported in .NET 3.5 but here goes. I want to require a generic type passed into my class to have a constructor like this: new(IDictionary<string,object>) so the class would look like this public MyClass<T> where T : new(IDictionary<string,object>) { T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values) { return new T(values); } } But the compiler doesn't support this, it doesn't really know what I'm asking. Some of you might ask, why do you want to do this? Well I'm working on a pet project of an ORM so I get values from the DB and then create the object and load the values. I thought it would be cleaner to allow the object just create itself with the values I give it. As far as I can tell I have two options: 1) Use reflection(which I'm trying to avoid) to grab the PropertyInfo[] array and then use that to load the values. 2) require T to support an interface like so: public interface ILoadValues { void LoadValues(IDictionary values); } and then do this public MyClass<T> where T:new(),ILoadValues { T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values) { T obj = new T(); obj.LoadValues(values); return obj; } } The problem I have with the interface I guess is philosophical, I don't really want to expose a public method for people to load the values. Using the constructor the idea was that if I had an object like this namespace DataSource.Data { public class User { protected internal User(IDictionary<string,object> values) { //Initialize } } } As long as the MyClass<T> was in the same assembly the constructor would be available. I personally think that the Type constraint in my opinion should ask (Do I have access to this constructor? I do, great!) Anyways any input is welcome.

    Read the article

  • Excel 2003 VBA : how to paste a shape after selection

    - by Justin
    Just wondering how I can paste an object after I have selected it: sheet1.shapes("MyShape").select With Selection basically jsut wondering how to duplicate a shape object, or any object really. Eventually I am looking to use code to copy a shape object like above from Excel, and paste it into an access form automatically. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • With Protobuf-net, does it allow deserialization reuse existing instances if they are the same?

    - by Stecy
    I'm using Protobuf-net. Suppose I have a list of Gizmo objects serialized and that each gizmo object reference a Gazoo object. The Gazoo object might be the same object referred by several Gizmo objects. How would deserialization work in this situation? Would I get more than one copies of Gazoos for the same referred one in the gizmo objects? What I would expect would be one copy of Gazoo for all the duplicates in the serialized data.

    Read the article

  • how to sort JTable by providing column index externally.

    - by user345940
    I would like to implement sorting on JTable by providing column index externally in program. Here is my sample code in which i have initialize JTable, Add one Column and 30 rows to JTable. After rows has been added i am sorting JTable by providing column index 0 but i could not get sorted data. how can i get my first column in sorted order? what's wrong with my code. **Why sortCTableonColumnIndex() method could not sort data for specify column index? ` public class Test { private JTable oCTable; private DefaultTableModel oDefaultTableModel; private JScrollPane oPane; private JTableHeader oTableHeader; private TableRowSorter sorter; public void adddata() { for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++) { Object[] row = new Object[1]; String sValueA = "A"; String sValueB = "A"; row[0] = ""; if (i % 2 == 0) { if (i < 15) { sValueA = sValueA + sValueA; row[1] = sValueA; } else { if (i == 16) { sValueB = "D"; row[1] = sValueA; } else { sValueB = sValueB + sValueB; row[1] = sValueA; } } } else { if (i < 15) { sValueB = sValueB + sValueB; row[1] = sValueB; } else { if (i == 17) { sValueB = "C"; row[1] = sValueB; } else { sValueB = sValueB + sValueB; row[1] = sValueB; } } } } } public void createTable() { oCTable = new JTable(); oDefaultTableModel = new DefaultTableModel(); oCTable.setModel(oDefaultTableModel); oTableHeader = oCTable.getTableHeader(); oCTable.setAutoResizeMode(oCTable.AUTO_RESIZE_OFF); oCTable.setFillsViewportHeight(true); JTable oTable = new LineNumberTable(oCTable); oPane = new JScrollPane(oCTable); oPane.setRowHeaderView(oTable); JPanel oJPanel = new JPanel(); oJPanel.setLayout(new BorderLayout()); oJPanel.add(oPane, BorderLayout.CENTER); JDialog oDialog = new JDialog(); oDialog.add(oJPanel); oDialog.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(500, 300)); oDialog.pack(); oDialog.setVisible(true); } public void insert() { oDefaultTableModel.addColumn("Name"); int iColumnPlace = ((DefaultTableModel) oCTable.getModel()).findColumn("Name"); CellRendererForRowHeader oCellRendererForRowHeader = new CellRendererForRowHeader(); TableColumn Column = oCTable.getColumn(oTableHeader.getColumnModel().getColumn(iColumnPlace).getHeaderValue()); Column.setPreferredWidth(300); Column.setMaxWidth(300); Column.setMinWidth(250); Column.setCellRenderer(oCellRendererForRowHeader); for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++) { Object[] row = new Object[1]; String sValueA = "A"; if (i % 2 == 0) { if (i < 15) { sValueA = sValueA + "a"; oDefaultTableModel.insertRow(oCTable.getRowCount(), new Object[]{""}); oDefaultTableModel.setValueAt(sValueA, i, 0); } else { if (i == 16) { sValueA = sValueA + "b"; oDefaultTableModel.insertRow(oCTable.getRowCount(), new Object[]{""}); oDefaultTableModel.setValueAt(sValueA, i, 0); } else { sValueA = sValueA + "c"; oDefaultTableModel.insertRow(oCTable.getRowCount(), new Object[]{""}); oDefaultTableModel.setValueAt(sValueA, i, 0); } } } else { if (i < 15) { sValueA = sValueA + "d"; oDefaultTableModel.insertRow(oCTable.getRowCount(), new Object[]{""}); oDefaultTableModel.setValueAt(sValueA, i, 0); } else { if (i == 17) { sValueA = sValueA + "e"; oDefaultTableModel.insertRow(oCTable.getRowCount(), new Object[]{""}); oDefaultTableModel.setValueAt(sValueA, i, 0); } else { sValueA = sValueA + "f"; oDefaultTableModel.insertRow(oCTable.getRowCount(), new Object[]{""}); oDefaultTableModel.setValueAt(sValueA, i, 0); } } } } } public void showTable() { createTable(); insert(); sortCTableonColumnIndex(0, true); } public void sortCTableonColumnIndex(int iColumnIndex, boolean bIsAsc) { sorter = new TableRowSorter(oDefaultTableModel); List<RowSorter.SortKey> sortKeys = new ArrayList<RowSorter.SortKey>(); if (bIsAsc) { sortKeys.add(new RowSorter.SortKey(iColumnIndex, SortOrder.ASCENDING)); } else { sortKeys.add(new RowSorter.SortKey(iColumnIndex, SortOrder.DESCENDING)); } sorter.setSortKeys(sortKeys); oDefaultTableModel.fireTableStructureChanged(); oCTable.updateUI(); } public static void main(String[] argu) { Test oTest = new Test(); oTest.showTable(); } class CellRendererForRowHeader extends DefaultTableCellRenderer { public Component getTableCellRendererComponent(JTable table, Object value, boolean isSelected, boolean hasFocus, int row, int column) { JLabel label = null; try { label = (JLabel) super.getTableCellRendererComponent(table, value, isSelected, hasFocus, row, column); if (column == 0) { label.setBackground(new JLabel().getBackground()); label.setForeground(Color.BLACK); } } catch (RuntimeException ex) { } return label; } } class LineNumberTable extends JTable { private JTable mainTable; public LineNumberTable(JTable table) { super(); mainTable = table; setAutoCreateColumnsFromModel(false); setModel(mainTable.getModel()); setAutoscrolls(false); addColumn(new TableColumn()); getColumnModel().getColumn(0).setCellRenderer(mainTable.getTableHeader().getDefaultRenderer()); getColumnModel().getColumn(0).setPreferredWidth(40); setPreferredScrollableViewportSize(getPreferredSize()); } @Override public boolean isCellEditable(int row, int column) { return false; } @Override public Object getValueAt(int row, int column) { return Integer.valueOf(row + 1); } @Override public int getRowHeight(int row) { return mainTable.getRowHeight(); } } } `

    Read the article

  • Loading data in constructors and not in constructors

    - by Richeve S. Bebedor
    I just want to know the difference between loading the data inside the constructor and loading the data outside the constructor but not inside any methods example: Loading inside constructor public class Model{ Object testobject; public Model(){ testobject=new Object(); } } VS example: Loading outside constructor public class Model{ Object testobject=new Object(); public Model(){ } }

    Read the article

  • Generic Type constraint in .net

    - by Jose
    Okay I'm looking for some input, I'm pretty sure this is not currently supported in .NET 3.5 but here goes. I want to require a generic type passed into my class to have a constructor like this: new(IDictionary<string,object>) so the class would look like this public MyClass<T> where T : new(IDictionary<string,object>) { T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values) { return new T(values); } } But the compiler doesn't support this, it doesn't really know what I'm asking. Some of you might ask, why do you want to do this? Well I'm working on a pet project of an ORM so I get values from the DB and then create the object and load the values. I thought it would be cleaner to allow the object just create itself with the values I give it. As far as I can tell I have two options: 1) Use reflection(which I'm trying to avoid) to grab the PropertyInfo[] array and then use that to load the values. 2) require T to support an interface like so: public interface ILoadValues { void LoadValues(IDictionary values); } and then do this public MyClass<T> where T:new(),ILoadValues { T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values) { T obj = new T(); obj.LoadValues(values); return obj; } } The problem I have with the interface I guess is philosophical, I don't really want to expose a public method for people to load the values. Using the constructor the idea was that if I had an object like this namespace DataSource.Data { public class User { protected internal User(IDictionary<string,object> values) { //Initialize } } } As long as the MyClass<T> was in the same assembly the constructor would be available. I personally think that the Type constraint in my opinion should ask (Do I have access to this constructor? I do, great!) Anyways any input is welcome.

    Read the article

  • Schema to support dynamic properties

    - by Johan Fredrik Varen
    Hi people. I'm working on an editor that enables its users to create "object" definitions in real-time. A definition can contain zero or more properties. A property has a name a type. Once a definition is created, a user can create an object of that definition and set the property values of that object. So by the click of a mouse-button, the user should ie. be able to create a new definition called "Bicycle", and add the property "Size" of type "Numeric". Then another property called "Name" of type "Text", and then another property called "Price" of type "Numeric". Once that is done, the user should be able to create a couple of "Bicycle" objects and fill in the "Name" and "Price" property values of each bike. Now, I've seen this feature in several software products, so it must be a well-known concept. My problem started when I sat down and tried to come up with a DB schema to support this data structure, because I want the property values to be stored using the appropriate column types. Ie. a numeric property value is stored as, say, an INT in the database, and a textual property value is stored as VARCHAR. First, I need a table that will hold all my object definitions: Table obj_defs id | name | ---------------- 1 | "Bicycle" | 2 | "Book" | Then I need a table for holding what sort of properties each object definition should have: Table prop_defs id | obj_def_id | name | type | ------------------------------------ 1 | 1 | "Size" | ? | 2 | 1 | "Name" | ? | 3 | 1 | "Price" | ? | 4 | 2 | "Title" | ? | 5 | 2 | "Author" | ? | 6 | 2 | "ISBN" | ? | I would also need a table that holds each object: Table objects id | created | updated | ------------------------------ 1 | 2011-05-14 | 2011-06-15 | 2 | 2011-05-14 | 2011-06-15 | 3 | 2011-05-14 | 2011-06-15 | Finally, I need a table that will hold the actual property values of each object, and one solution is for this table to have one column for each possible value type, such as this: Table prop_vals id | prop_def_id | object_id | numeric | textual | boolean | ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 | 1 | 1 | 27 | | | 2 | 2 | 1 | | "Trek" | | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1249 | | | 4 | 1 | 2 | 26 | | | 5 | 2 | 2 | | "GT" | | 6 | 3 | 2 | 159 | | | 7 | 4 | 3 | | "It" | | 8 | 5 | 3 | | "King" | | 9 | 6 | 4 | 9 | | | If I implemented this schema, what would the "type" column of the prop_defs table hold? Integers that each map to a column name, varchars that simply hold the column name? Any other possibilities? Would a stored procedure help me out here in some way? And what would the SQL for fetching the "name" property of object 2 look like?

    Read the article

  • Dictionary with single item

    - by alhazen
    In the case where Dictionary<object, object> myDictionary happens to contain a single item, what is the best way to retrieve the value object (if I don't care about the key) ? if (myDictionary.Count == 1) { // Doesn't work object obj = myDictionary.Values[0]; } Thanks

    Read the article

  • Mustache vs other engines. Maybe I should use another template engine?

    - by marcioAlmada
    I'm passing an object to mustache and this object has a method with one parameter. Is something like this possible with Mustache and PHP? {{object.method(parameter)}} If it gets too laborious to achieve this with Mustache, what template engine would you recommend? Remember I need to pass parameters to object methods while in the view context (like we do with helpers). The nearest as possible to mustache syntax is welcome.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267  | Next Page >